sickness control through vaccination session 11 - promoting... · ahs-attenuated live virus (alv)...
TRANSCRIPT
African Horse sickness control through vaccination
Baptiste DUNGU DVM PhD
CEO
Onderstepoort Biological Products Ltd. OBP
Onderstepoort, Pretoria South Africa
Layout
Onderstepoort OBP
AHS history
Vaccine in the control of AHS
Roadmap toward an effective safer DIVA AHS vaccine
FVS OBP OVI
Onderstepoort Biological Products
Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute
Faculty of Veterinary Science
More than 50 different livestock vaccines and other biological products
OBP…in short
State owned company: commercial mandate
200 staff member
More than 50 different biologics:
28 bacterial vaccines,
14 viral vaccines,
4 Protozoal (Blood) vaccines
Autogenous vaccines
6 diagnostic reagents
Therapeutic sera
Culture media
Production Capacity: more than 150 million doses annually
Species covered: Cattle, Sheep, Goat, equine, poultry
6
“What we wish to point out is that, as a scourge which annually causes immense loss to the Colonies, it behoves the authorities to take adequate and scientific means to combat it. As yet absolutely nothing is known about its etiology…it is manifest that until the cause is known we cannot hope to battle with the disease. The discovery of the haematozoon of tsetse-fly disease was a notable feather in the cap of the school of research at Cambridge. Cannot some pathologist from the most progressive of Universities help us in like manner with the paarde-ziekte when peace once more reigns from Cape Town to the Zambezi? (Anon., 1900). “
7 | Onderstepoort Biological Products © | March 9, 2020
…are we running in circles?
www.goldcircle.co.zaSummerveld Training Centre at Shongweni.
9
By 1915
•Virus
•Inoculable but not contagious
•Transmitted by blood sucking insects (mentions
Culicoides but suspects mosquito)
•Has to be a natural reservoir
•Horses, dogs once recovered not viraemic
•Prevention and cure
•Identifies immunity as potentially the best option
•Did first vaccinations using serum of recovered
horse/mule with virus
•Multiple serotypes “antigenic plurality”, some cross
protection between certain types
Vaccine breakthrough, the 60 year project
AHS historical distribution
M Quan, 2014
Egypt (1928, 1943, 1953, 1958,
1971),
Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria
(1944)
Iran and Persian Gulf (1959-1961)
Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria
(1965-1967)
Saudi Arabia (1989, 1997)
Spain and southern Iberian
Peninsula (1965-66, 1987-1991)
Cape Verde Islands (1999)
• Vector-borne Orbivirus infection (Reoviridae) of equidae, endemic in large parts of Africa
• 9 different serotypes with some cross-neutralization
• Notifiable disease, OIE Status; worldwide importance
• Exceptional mortality rate in naïve horses
• Up to 95% in horses and 50-70% in mules
• Equus burchelli believed to be primary viral reservoir
• Transmission primarily by biting midges of the genus Culicoides
• Extent of favourable climatic conditions for breeding of Culicoides
• Most serious outbreaks often during March and April
• C. imicola: 98% of all species in trap catches at Onderstepoort and AHSV repeatedly isolated
• C.bolitinos: implicated as vector in a number of outbreaks
AHS – THE DISEASE
AHS - SUSCEPTIBILITY
Equids -
Horses
Mules
Donkeys
Zebra
Canines
Susceptible
50-70%
70-95%
10%
Resistant
1
2
3
4
56
7 8 9
10
10 dsRNA genes VP1
VP2
VP3
VP4
VP5NS1
NS2
VP6
VP7
NS3
African horsesickness virus
10 proteinsOuter capsid pro-teins VP5 & VP2
Core protein VP7 Minor core proteins
Why is AHS still a problem?
• The virus and vectors are endemic in SA & large parts of Africa
• Inadequate immunity
• No sustained vaccination
• Wrong advice and wrong use of vaccine
• Uncontrolled movement of horses
• Weaknesses in surveillance
AHS Control in South AfricaSurveillance, Vaccination and Movement control
Due to nature of current AHS LAV, vaccination restricted to low vector seasonsWith a non-replicating vaccine, the vaccination program could be modified in allowing more flexibility on time and animals to be vaccinated
The virus is endemic in SA
AHSV PCR submissions 2017+18
Total: 776
Positive 2017: 137/3632018: 123/413
Serotypes per season
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2016 - 2017 2017 - 2018
AHS-attenuated live virus (ALV) Vaccinesince 1994
• Exclude serotype T5 and T9• T5 was omitted as vaccinated foals suffered severe reactions and
death. Follow-up vaccination studies showed that the combination of T4 and T5 in bottle I was the cause.
• T9 is low-immunogenic and was rare in southern Africa until recently
AHS Bottle I AHS Bottle II Cross reaction
Serotype 1 Serotype 2 1 ↔ 2
Serotype 3 Serotype 6 3 ↔ 7
Serotype 4 Serotype 7 4
Serotype 8 5 ↔ 8
6 ↔ 9
AHS ALV vaccine challenges
AHS free
AHS endemic
AHS vaccine manufacturer
Risk of reassortmentNot in pregnant animalsRestricted for low vector periodsNot recommended in high vector periods or during outbreaksNo DIVAMay not be suitable for epizootic situations or free countriesVaccination may be considered as an “infection” (OIE status)Vaccine produced in Senegal for example comprises all 9 serotypes…
New vaccine? Why?
Attribute Comply
Protection to all serotypes
> 90% animals protected
Duration of immunity ≥ 1 year
Safety ?
Storage, transport temperature 4°C
Enzootic & epizootic use ×
Marker vaccine (DIVA) ×
Current vaccine
AHS vaccine technologies to date
• Live attenuated
• Inactivated vaccinesTraditional vaccine
technologies:
• Live Disabled Single Infection Cycle (DISC) vaccines: (VP6-deficient AHSV strains)
• Live Disabled Single Animal (DISA) vaccines (NS3/NS3a-deficient AHSV strains)
• Inactivated (capsid swap) vaccines
• Sub-unit adjuvanted vaccines
• Canarypox virus expressing AHSV-VP2 and AHSV-VP5
• Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) expressing AHSV-VP2
New technologies (based on
Technology Review report by
J. Castillo):
• Plant expressed AHS-VLP expressed in plant (University of Cape Town, funded by DST)
Other technologies
IHSC driven process for the development of a DIVA AHS vaccine
Glossary of termsExecutive SummaryBackground to the ProcessApproach usedRoadmap toward the development of a DIVA AHS vaccineDesired Characteristics for the DIVA AHS vaccine
Target Product Profile (TPP)AHS vaccine technology reviewVaccination strategy overviewMarket and economic aspects reviewStakeholders inputs & key partnerships for AHS DIVA vaccine developmentCandidate vaccines selection for the medium term
Inactivated AHS vaccinesCanarypox vaccine candidateMVA-VP2 vaccinePlant expressed AHS VLP vaccines
Critical activities for the development of the AHS DIVA vaccineApproved experimental vector-proof horse stablesChallenge model and studies
Timelines for the development of the selected candidateFunding and funding models
Partial funding (pump-priming)Funding of specific candidates
Legal and regulatory needsRecommendations for the Way forwards beyond the present
process
Most important desired characteristics
• Profile of the most desirable characteristics: out of TPP
• Protection to all 9 serotypes
• DIVA
• Flexible for use as monovalent in case of defined outbreaks or epidemics
• Flexible for use in different combinations based on specific epidemiological situation (2 to 3 serotypes in certain regions)
• Effective on all equids and possibly all susceptible animals (e.g. camels)
• Safe for use in horses of all ages and all physiological stages (pregnant, young etc.)
• Adaptable to different vaccination programs: high performance, working horses, movement of horses to and from endemic regions, emergency vaccination etc.
• Affordable to different types of equids
Detailed desired AHS DIVA vaccine
characteristics:
Target Product Profiles
Attribute Minimum Ideal
1 Antigen immunogens protective to AHSV infection Immunogens protective to all 9 serotypes of AHSV
2 Indication for use For active immunisation of horses against
AHSV
For active immunisation of equids (incl. mules and donkeys) of
all ages and physiological conditions against all 9 serotypes of
AHSV. Suitable for immunization of wild equids
Epidemiological relevance Suitable for protection of horses in AHS
enzootic regions
Suitable for protection of equids in enzootic and epizootic
regions, including immunisation of equids being moved between
regions of different AHS status
EFFICACY
Expected efficacy To prevent disease in > 70% of vaccinated
animals
To prevent infection in > 80% of vaccinated animals
Immunity spectrum Protection to all 9 serotypes Equal protection to all 9 serotypes with possibility of individual
serotype protection
5 Onset of immunity Within 3 weeks of complete vaccination Within 10 days following complete vaccination
6 Route of administration Subcutaneous (SC) or Intramuscular (IM) Intramuscular
7 Regimen - vaccination Yearly vaccination to include primo and
booster doses
Yearly vaccination to include primo and booster doses
8 Recommended age at first vaccination As early as possible
9 Duration of immunity Minimum of 12 months Protection to all serotype for at least one year
SAFETY
10 Expected safety Mild and transient injection site reactions
and pyrexia lasting less than 14 days in up to
20% of vaccinated animals.
Mild and transient injection site reactions and pyrexia lasting
less than 7 days in up to 10% of vaccinated animals.
11 Reproductive safety No for milk, 4 weeks for meat Suitable for all stages of pregnancy
Suitable for stallions at any stage
12 Environmental safety No vaccine derived infectious material detectable…
14 Reassortment risk Demonstrated inability to reassort with
wildtype AHSV
Structurally incapable of reassorting with other viruses
DIVA
15 Detection of infection Detection of infection in vaccinated animals
by PCR or serology
Detection of infection in vaccinated animals by PCR or serology
OTHER VACCINE CHARACTERISTICS
16 Package size 1 to 10 doses 1 and 10 doses
17 Cost to end users Not more than current vaccines Not more than double current vaccine price
18 Storage requirements Stable at 4°C Stable at 30°C for 48 hours
19 Shelf-life as packaged for sale 12 months 24 months
Selection of AHS vaccine technology
Inactivated AHS vaccine
• More appropriate for medium term solution
• Proven efficacy & safety
• Proven polyvalency
• DIVA possible: PCR & ELISA (including purified vaccine)
• No risk of virus maintenance
• Industrial processes available
• Interest expressed by manufacturers
• If used largely, may contribute to reducing endemicity
• Suitable for use during outbreaks in all age and physiological groups
Inactivated AHS vaccine development currently ongoing
Development of the inactivated AHS vaccine at OBP
• Vaccine development
• Establishment of a Vector protected facility for clinical studies
• Development and validation of DIVA diagnostic assays
• Interaction with partners (scientific, technical, stakeholders, funders)
Progress with inactivated AHS vaccine development
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Ma
r-1
9
Ap
r-1
9
Ma
y-1
9
Jun
-19
Jul-
19
Au
g-1
9
Se
p-1
9
Oct-
19
No
v-1
9
De
c-1
9
Jan
-20
Fe
b-2
0
Ma
r-2
0
Ap
r-2
0
Ma
y-2
0
Jun
-20
Jul-
20
Au
g-2
0
Se
p-2
0
Oct-
20
No
v-2
0
De
c-2
0
Jan
-21
Fe
b-2
1
Ma
r-2
1
Ap
r-2
1
Ma
y-2
1
Jun
-21
Jul-
21
Au
g-2
1
Se
p-2
1
Oct-
21
No
v-2
1
Refurbishment of OBP vector protected stables √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Proof of concept (PoC)
9 AHSV serotypes ID confirmation √ √
Agreements between partners finalised √ √ √
Production of MS √ √ √
Production of 9 virus antigens √ √ √ √
Assessment of Inactivation & concentration √ √
Formulation of mono- & multivalent vaccines
Immunogenicity study in horses
PoC for multivalent immunogenicity
Challenge studies in horses
PoC for multivalent protection
Full development
Production of GMP seed material √
Prodution of pilot batches
Dose titration studies in horses
Development & validation of QC procedures √
Production of industrial batches
Product Shelflife
Full regulatory safety study in horses
Regulatory efficacy studies in horses
Duration of immunity
Field safety and Efficacy
Registration
Dossier preparation & submission
Refurbishment of vector-proof stables in compliance with Vet services requirements
Multivalent Inactivated AHS vaccine project plan
Agreement OBP-HKJC
HKJC has granted OBP GBP100,000 as contribution toward the development of the inact AHS vaccine
Funding to be used toward the Immunogenicity in horses Proof of Concept clinical study
Vector-protected animal facility
Facility required by DAFF for vector-born animal diseases clinical studies
Required for immunogenicity, challenge and other regulatory clinical studies
Currently being established at OBP
DIVA Diagnostics
• ELISA format• Based on ratio of anti-NS3 vs anti-VP7 antibodies
• NS3 varies between serotypes• Determine minimum NS3 antigens to react with anti-
NS3 antibodies of all serotypes
• Validation• Determine analytical sensitivity and specificity
• Establish diagnostic specificity
• RT-PCR• Targeting any serogroup specific gene
• e.g. Segment 7
Way forward…
• South African African horse sickness vaccine working group (SA AHS VWG) established since 28th June 2019
• Some of the major activities:• Review of the TPP for AHS vaccines
• Draft guidelines for selection of seed strains for AHS vaccines
• Draft guidelines for multivalent immunogenicity studies in horses
• Standards for the design and operation of vector protected facilities for the keeping of animals for experimental infections with vector-borne animal pathogens
• Fundraising…
THANK YOU