Sidas Humanitarian Work

Sidas Strategy for Humanitarian Work 2008-2010Based on the Governments Humanitarian Policy (2005).Aim: Save lives, alleviate suffering and maintain human dignity.Guided by international law and humanitarian principles (humanity, independence, impartiality and neutrality).Stresses GHD (quick, predictable, flexible, needs-based).Projects through the UN, Red Cross, NGOs and relevant authorities. Appropriation can be used for Disaster Preparedness and should support transition to recovery and longer-term development. Promote the international humanitarian system through contributions to research, method development and capacity development (secondments).Assist the MFA in advancing the development of international humanitarian policy.

The Humanitarian Team ATHAProject LeaderController 15 persons 16 languages 77 years of field experience From the Red Cross, UN, NGOs, private sector

Policy Specialist Human Security

Swedish Humanitarian AssistanceUNITED STATES of AMERICACANADAALASKA (USA)MEXICOCOLOMBIAVENEZUELABRAZILPERUBOLIVIAHONDURASNICARAGUAECUADORGUYANASURINAMEFRENCH GUIANACOSTA RICAPANAMAGUATEMALACUBAPARAGUAYARGENTINAURUGUAYCHILEGREENLANDICELANDUNITED KINGDOMREPULIC OF IRELANDNORWAYSWEDENFINLANDDENMARKESTONIALATVIALITHUANIAPOLANDBELARUSGERMANYCZECH REPUBLICNETHERLANDSBELGIUMFRANCESPAINPORTUGALSWITZ.AUSTRIASLOVAKIAHUNGARYROMANIABULGARIAITALYUKRAINETURKEYGREECESYRIAIRAQSAUDI ARABIAYEMENOMANUAEEGYPTLIBYAALGERIAMOROCCOTUNISIAWESTERN SAHARAMAURITANIAMALINIGERCHADSUDANETHIOPIASOMALIAUGANDASENEGALGUINEALIBERIACOTE DIVOIREBURKINAGHANANIGERIACAMEROONCENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLICGABONCONGODEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGOKENYATANZANIAANGOLAZAMBIAMOZAMBIQUENAMIBIABOTSWANAZIMBABWEREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICAMADAGASCARRUSSIAN FEDERATIONKAZAKHSTANGEORGIAIRANUZBEKISTANTURKMENISTANAFGHANISTANKYRGYZSTANTAHKISTANPAKISTANINDIACHINANEPALMYANMARTHAILANDSRI LANKAMONGOLIANORTH KOREASOUTH KOREAJAPANTAIWANCAMBODIALAOSVIETNAMPHILIPPINESMALAYSIAINDONESIAPAPUA NEW GUINEAAUSTRALIANEW ZEALAND Countries with humanitarian projects 2007 Sida field presence SIda field presence with humanitarian profileGEORGIA

Geographical divisionUNITED STATES of AMERICACANADAALASKA (USA)MEXICOCOLOMBIAVENEZUELABRAZILPERUBOLIVIAHONDURASNICARAGUAECUADORGUYANASURINAMEFRENCH GUIANACOSTA RICAPANAMAGUATEMALACUBAPARAGUAYARGENTINAURUGUAYCHILEGREENLANDICELANDUNITED KINGDOMREPULIC OF IRELANDNORWAYSWEDENFINLANDDENMARKESTONIALATVIALITHUANIAPOLANDBELARUSGERMANYCZECH REPUBLICNETHERLANDSBELGIUMFRANCESPAINPORTUGALSWITZ.AUSTRIASLOVAKIAHUNGARYROMANIABULGARIAITALYUKRAINETURKEYGREECESYRIAIRAQSAUDI ARABIAYEMENOMANUAEEGYPTLIBYAALGERIAMOROCCOTUNISIAWESTERN SAHARAMAURITANIAMALINIGERCHADSUDANETHIOPIASOMALIAUGANDASENEGALGUINEALIBERIACOTE DIVOIREBURKINAGHANANIGERIACAMEROONCENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLICGABONCONGODEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGOKENYATANZANIAANGOLAZAMBIAMOZAMBIQUENAMIBIABOTSWANAZIMBABWEREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICAMADAGASCARRUSSIAN FEDERATIONKAZAKHSTANGEORGIAIRANUZBEKISTANTURKMENISTANAFGHANISTANKYRGYZSTANTAHKISTANPAKISTANINDIACHINANEPALMYANMARTHAILANDSRI LANKAMONGOLIANORTH KOREASOUTH KOREAJAPANTAIWANCAMBODIALAOSVIETNAMPHILIPPINESMALAYSIAINDONESIAPAPUA NEW GUINEAAUSTRALIANEW ZEALANDGEORGIASudan:251 645 000 (12%)DRC:171 368 000 (8%)oPt:128 796 000 (6%)Somalia:115 368 000 (6%)Uganda:105 275 000 (5%)

Allocations 2001 2008 (MSEK)YearAllocationDisbursed

20011 0771 3062002 9301 22220031 1001 26220041 5301 61020051 9421 87720061 9702 01220072 0452 06420082 010

10 largest partner organisations 2007

Vra uppdragSidas humanitarian support separate allocationCAP Flash AppealsRed Cross Minor hum. framesSRSA Single projectsEarly recovery with delegated fundsDisaster Risk Reduction and preventionCounselling in humanitarian affairs

Guiding PrinciplesGoodHumanitarian DonorshipSave lives, reduce suffering, maintain dignity.Humain, impartial, neutral and independent.Non-political assistance in politicised environment.Based on needs, no concentration to countries.Sida presence in fewer countries requires new methods.

The Humanitarian VIsionCompetenceStrengthen the Swedish humanitarian competence through strategic recruitment, secondment and training. +CapacityIncrease Swedens joint humanitarian capacity through strengthening humanitarian competence in the field. EffectivenessQuick and competens processing of humanitarian projects, i e no reduction of capacity at HQ in Sweden. QualityAscertaining the quality of Swedish humanitarian assistance through: Knowledge and understanding Presence and follow-up Speed and predictability=+