PRESENTATION

AGENDA

1. Introduction public value: organizational strategy for public sectors.

3. E-Government

4. Open Innovation

5. Crowdsourcing

6. Open Government

7. Research context

8. Current research status

9. Conclusions

10.References

1

INTRODUCTION

Ministry of ICT of Colombia (MinTIC, 2014) filed the act

2573 of 2014 where established the general directions

of the electronic government

strategy. Recommendations of the Organization for

Economic Co-operation and Development (OCDE) and

Open Government promote more

open, participative and innovative

approaches allowing citizens to have access to open

data to foster public use.

CREATING PUBLIC VALUE

substantively valuable

legitimate and political sustainable

operationally and administrable 2

3

E-GOVERNMENT

Source: (United Nations, & American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), 2002, p. 1, Means & Schneider, 2002, p. 121, Duffy, 2001 , Brown & Brudney, J, L., 2001, Riasco & Giordano, 2008)

4

OPEN INNOVATION

closed innovation model versus open innovation model. Chesbrough (2003, 2006)

Source: closed innovation model versus open innovation model. Chesbrough (2003, 2006)

5

CROWDSOURCING

Source: (Agrawal, Catalini, & Goldfarb, 2011, Seltzer & Mahmoudi, 2013; Brabham, 2008)

6

OPEN GOVERNMENT

Source: Wikipedia (accessed 5/30/2015)

7

OPEN GOVERNMENT

Source: Information flow in a ideal Open Government System, (Gavelin, Burall, & Wilson, 2009)

8

OPEN GOVERNMENT

Source: Hilgers & Ihl, (2010)

9

OPEN GOVERNMENT

Source: Framework for citizen engaged governance (Hilgers & Ihl, 2010)

10

RESEARCH CONTEXT

á

á

11

CURRENT RESEARCH STATUS

Source: own creation.

12

CONCLUSIONS

13

REFERENCES

Agrawal, Catalini, & Goldfarb. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding.

Alujas Ramírez. (2011). Gobierno Abierto y Modernización de la Gestión Pública. Tendencias actuales y el

(Inevitable) Camino que Viene-Reflexiones Seminales (Open Government and Modernization of Public

Management: Current Trends and the (Inevitable) Way Forward-Seminal Reflections). Revista Enfoques: Ciencia

Política y Administración Pública, 9(15), 99-125.

Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving an introduction and cases. Convergence: the

international journal of research into new media technologies, 14(1), 75-90.

Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing Public Participation.

Brabham, D. C. (2010). Moving the crowd at Threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application.

Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1122-1145. http://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003624090

Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J, L. (2001). Achieving advanced electronic government services: An examination of

obstacles and implications from an international perspective. Paper presented at the National Public Management

Research Conference, Bloomington, IN.

Chapman, R., & Hunt, M. (1987). Open Government. A study of the prospects of open government within the

limitations of the British political system, Routledge, London.

Chesbrough. (2003). Open innovation -The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology.

Cohen, & Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovatión. Administrative

Science Quarterly, Volume 35, Issue I: Tecnology, Organization and Innovation, 35, 128, 152.

Duffy, D. (2001). Q&A: Balancing the role of e-Government: Interview with Mike Hernon, vice president of

egovernment for New York City-based GovWorks.

Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon.

Gavelin, K., Burall, S., & Wilson, R. (2009). Open Government: beyond static measures A paper produced by Involve

for the OECD.

Hilgers, D., & Ihl, C. (2010). Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. The

International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1), 67-88.

14

REFERENCES

Howe, J. (2006). The Rise of Crowdsourcing, Wired, 14(6). Retrieved from

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.htm

Huizingh, E. . (2010). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives.

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for Innovation: The role of openess in explaining innovation performance

among UK manufacturing firms.

Lévy, P., & Bonomo, R. (1999). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. Perseus

Publishing.

Means, G., & Schneider, D. (2002). Meta-capitalism: The e-business revolution and the design of 21st century

companies and markets. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

MinTIC. (2014). Decreto Gobierno en línea.

Moore, M., H. (1997). Creating public value.

Riasco, S. ., & Giordano, G. . (2008). Riascos, S. C., Giordano, G. M., & Solano, O. J. El Gobierno Electrónico como

estrategia de participación ciudadana en la Administración pública a nivel de Suramérica-Casos Colombia y

Uruguay.

Seltzer, & Mahmoudi. (2013). Citizen Participation, Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing.

Surowiecki. (2005). The wisdom of crowds.

United Nations, & American Society for Public Administration (ASPA). (2002). Benchmarking e-government: A

global perspective. New York, NY: U.N. Publications.

Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT press.

Wikipedia. (2013). “Open Government.” Wikipedia.org. Last Modified on July 11, 2013.

Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward.

2

AGENDA