silver nanoparticles misting - an innovative method of...
TRANSCRIPT
Silver nanoparticles misting
- an innovative method
of archaeological object disinfection
Katarzyna Pietrzak, M.Sc., Eng.
Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology
Lodz University of Technology
Research co-funded by the International Visegrad FundModern approach for biodeterioration assessment and disinfection of historical book collections
Silver nanoparticles application
• filters for air purification• filters for water
purification• stomatology• dietary supplements• implants• textiles• cosmetics, detergents• home appliance• computer hardware• coatings, grouts, adhesives• food packaging• papermaking• disinfection of historical
objects
Chaloupka et al., 2010; Gutarowska et al., 2012
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)
Synthesis
▫ chemical
▫ physical
▫ biological
Feng et al., 2000; Kim et al., 2007
triangular spherical rods
viruses moulds yeastsGram-
negativebacteria
Gram-positive bacteria
sensitivity
Effectiveness
• shape
• form
• size
• concentration
• microorganisms
Mechanism of antibacterial action of AgNPs
disfunction of transport to the cell
inhibition of DNA replication
loss of the biological activity of the amino acid
structural and functional changes in the cell membrane
disturbance of the cell membrane electric potential
outflow of protons and certain metabolites throughthe cytoplasmic membrane
A
B
C
D
E
F
F
E
Wzorek, Konopka, 2007; Feng et al., 2000
Mechanism of antifungal action of AgNPsYeasts
• changes of cell wall functions and structure
• creation of "pits" in the cell membrane• disturbances of electric potential• inhibition of budding process
Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformansafter AgNPs treatment
Moulds• inhibition of sporulation process• changes in cell ultrastructure• changes in metabolome (acids, enzymes,
proteins)
Aspergillus niger after AgNPs treatment
Pinto et al., 2013: Ishida et al., 2014; Lara et al., 2015; Pietrzak et al., 2016
Aim and scope
Optimalization of AgNPs misting disinfection and its influence on microorganisms and disinfectedmaterials.
1. Determination of the sensitivity of pure culture collection microorganisms and isolatesfrom historical objects surfaces on the silver nanoparticles preparation.
2. Parameters optimization of the of effective disinfection of technical and historical materialswith silver nanoparticles misting.
3. Assessment of the effectiveness and durability of disinfection dependingon the microorganism, technical or historical material.
4. Analysis of the disinfection influence on mechanical and optical parameters of technicalmaterials before and after artificial ageing.
MaterialsTechnical:
- paper* (Sa, Hmp, Sy, CTMP, GW)
- leather (cowhide, dyed)
- textiles (wool, silk, cotton, linen)
- wood (beech, oak, pine)
*Sa - bleached pine kraft pulp; Hmp - bleached hemp kraft pulp; Sy - bleached spruce sulphite pulp; CTMP - chemi–thermomechanical pulp;GW - bleached groundwood from spruce (GW)
Historical:
- canvas (historical painting)- parchment (conservation materials)- wood (church floor; 17th c.)- paper (map; 18th - 19th c.)- textiles (wool, cotton, sisal; 13th – 15th c.)- ceramics (6th – 13th c.)
WoolCeramics Cotton
Silver nanoparticles
SEM image of nanosilver 1
TEM image of nanosilver 2
0
20
40
60
80
100
<3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 >12nu
mb
er o
f n
an
op
art
icle
s
nanoparticles 2 dimension (nm)
chemical reductionAgNO3; reductor: sodium citrate; stabilizer: PVP
concentration: 90 ppm
particle size: 10-80 nm
(10-15 nm – 60-70%; 50-80 nm –30-40%)
Mennica Polska S.A.
AgNPs 1 thermaldecompositionof silvercompounds; stabilizer: paraffins
concentration: 1000 ppm
particle size: 3-8 nm
Amepox sp. z o.o.
AgNPs 2
Microorganisms
ATCC – American Type Culture Collection; NCAIM - National Collection of Agricultural and Industrial Microorganisms; ŁOCK – Łódzki Ośrodek Czystych Kultur (Pure Culture Collection at Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Lodz University of Technology)
•Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus•Brevibacillus laterosporus•Bacillus subtilis•Bacillus megaterium•Bacillus pumilus•Bacillus licheniformis•Sphingomonas paucimobilis•Micrococcus sp.•Micrococcus flavus•Pseudomonas aeruginosa•Staphylococcus aureus•Staphylococcus lentus•Staphylococcus xylosus•Nocardia sp.•Escherichia coli (ATCC 10536)•Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538)•Bacillus subtilis (NCAIM 01644)
BACTERIA
•Alternaria alternata•Aspergillus versicolor•Aspergillus niger•Cladosporium cladosporioides•Cladosporium herbarum•Cladosporium macrocarpum•Mucor racemosus•Penicillium digitatum•Penicillium carneum•Penicillium crustosum•Penicillium radicola•Rhizopus nigricans•Candida sphaerica•Rhodotorula sp.•Rhodotorula mucilaginosa•Aspergillus niger (ATCC 16404)•Penicillium chrysogenum (ŁOCK 0531)•Candida albicans (ATCC 10231)
FUNGI
MethodsAnalysis Method / Standard
Silver nanoparticles
Characterization of preparation SEM; TEM
Determination of AgNPs content FAAS; LA-ICP-TOF-MS
Microorganisms
Determination of microbial sensitivity (MIC and MBC) ASTM E2149 – 01
Choosing the conditions for disinfectionEvaluation of the effectiveness and durability of the disinfection technical materials and historical objects
AATCC Test Method 100-2012
Materials
Assessment of mechanical parameters (breaking, elongation, tear, compression)
ISO 13934-1:1999 (textiles); ISO 3376:2005 (leather); ISO 20187:1993 (paper); ISO 1924-1:1998 (paper); BS EN 21974:2002 (paper); BS EN 384:2004 (wood)
Estimation of colour parametersMetoda Tappi T 524 om-94 (paper); ISO 2470:1999 (paper); ISO 105-J01:2002 (leather, textiles); Metoda SCI (wood)
SEM – Scaning Electron Microscopy; TEM – TransmissionElectron Microscopy; AATCC - American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists; ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials;FAAS – Flame Atomic Absorbance Spectrometry; LA-ICP-TOF-MS - Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Time-of- Flight Mass Spectrometry; MIC – Minimnal Inhibitory Concentration;MBC – Minimal biocidal Concentration; SCI - Specular Component Included
Microbial sensitivity to AgNPs
Microorganisms Origin MIC (ppm) MBC (ppm)
Staphylococcus aureusATCC 11.25 22.50
Museum 1 22.50 45.00
Bacillus subtilis
ATCC 22.50 > 45.00
Archives 22.50 > 45.00
Museum 2 45.00 > 45.00
Escherichia coli ATCC 11.25 22.50
Nocardia sp. Library 11.25 22.50
Aspergillus nigerATCC 22.50 45.00
Museum 2 45.00 45.00
Candida albicans ATCC 11.25 22.50
Candida sphaerica Library 22.50 22.50
MIC – Minimal Inhibitory Concentration; MBC - Minimal Biocidal Concentration; ATCC – American Type Culture Collection Gutarowska et al., 2012
moulds: Aspergillus sp., Rhizopus sp., Penicillium sp.;
G+ bacilli: Bacillus sp.;
G+ cocci: Micrococcus sp., Staphylococcussp.
moulds: Cladosporium sp., Alternaria sp., Mucor sp.;
yeasts: Rhodotorula sp., Candida sp.;
actinomycetes: Nocardia sp.
G- rods: Sphingomonas sp., Escherichia sp.
MIC 45.00 ppm 22.50 ppm 11.25 ppm
Microbial sensitivity to AgNPs
Viruses Mould YeastGram
negativebacteria
Gram positivebacteria
Gutarowska et al., 2012
AgNPs misting chamber
Wasiak R., Laskowski Z., Czyżyk J. The microbiological protectionmethod of archive and museum objects and installation for themicrobiological protection of archive and museum objects. PatentPL399507, Poland 2012
INSTAL WARSZAWA S.A.
Siennicka 29, 04-394 Warsaw, Polandwww.instalwaw.com.pl
Capacity: 1.73 m3 36-42 books A4
Choosing the conditions for AgNPs misting
Misting
Relativehumidity
90%
Temperature
25ºC
Airflow
1 m/s
Nozzle position
horizontal; horizontally -
vertical
Materialhumidity
20 – 70%
AgNPs concentration
45 - 90 ppm
Misting cycles
1 - 8
Gutarowska et al., 2012
Nozzle position and AgNPs distribution
Nozzle position(horizontally – vertical)
Sampling point AgNPs amount (ppm/g)*
1 2.8
2 2.2
3 3.3
4 2.7
5 2.9
6 2.3
Sample pointsdistribution
* FAAS – Flame Atomic Absorbance Spectrometry
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 3
Re
du
cti
on
of
B.
su
bti
lis
(%)
Misting cycles
horizontally horizontally-vertically
Gutarowska et al., 2012
Misting cycles, AgNPs concentration,
material humidity
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 6 8
Re
du
ctio
no
f A
. nig
er(%
)
Misting cycles
45 ppm 90 ppm
Gutarowska et al., 2012; 2014
10% - dry cotton
1,0E+00
1,0E+02
1,0E+04
1,0E+06
1,0E+08
1,0E+10
E. coli S. aureus B. subtilis A. niger
Nu
mb
er o
f m
icro
org
an
ism
s (C
FU
/sa
mp
le)
control 10%* 30% 50% 65%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Leather Wool Linen Cotton Silk GW Hmp CTMP Sy Sa Pine Oak Beech
Ag
NP
s a
mo
un
t (p
pm
/g)
Technical material
Silver nanoparticles amount by FAAS
FAAS – Flame Atomic Absorbance Spectrometry; Sa - bleached pine kraft pulp; Hmp - bleached hemp kraft pulp; Sy - bleached spruce sulphitepulp; CTMP - chemi–thermomechanical pulp; GW - bleached groundwood from spruce (GW)
8 misting cycles
Gutarowska et al., 2014
0
20
40
60
80
100
Bawełna Len Wełna Jedwab CTMP GW Hmp Sy Sa
Red
uc
tio
n (
%)
A. niger S. aureus E. coli B. subtilis
Cotton Linen Wool Silk
Disinfection effectiveness on technical materials
A. nigerS. aureusE. coliB. subtilis
*Sa - bleached pine kraft pulp; Hmp - bleached hemp kraft pulp; Sy - bleached spruce sulphite pulp; CTMP - chemi–thermomechanical pulp;GW - bleached groundwood from spruce (GW) Gutarowska et al., 2014
AgNPs misting durability
0
20
40
60
80
100
2 4 6 9 14
Re
du
ctio
n (
%)
Storage time (days)
E. coli A. niger
Storage conditions: 28°C, RH 80%
Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth
1,0E+00
1,0E+01
1,0E+02
1,0E+03
1,0E+04
1,0E+05
1,0E+06
0 3 5Nu
mb
er
of
mic
roo
rgan
ism
s(C
FU/c
m2)
Storage time (days)
control AgNPs
Pseudomonas aeruginosa on historical textile
Storage conditions: 28°C, RH 80%Pietrzak et al., 2016
97.1%
Disinfection effectiveness on historical materials
1,0E+00
1,0E+02
1,0E+04
1,0E+06
1,0E+08
1,0E+10
1,0E+12
canvas parchment paper map wooden floor
Nu
mb
er
of
mic
roo
rga
nis
ms
(CF
U/c
m2)
control AgNPs
Gutarowska et al., 2012
79.7%67.6%
99.7%
99.9%
Disinfection effectiveness on archaeological
textiles
1,0E+00
1,0E+01
1,0E+02
1,0E+03
1,0E+04
1,0E+05
1,0E+06
Cotton Sisal Wool 1 Wool 2 Wool 3 Wool 4 Wool 5 Ceramics
Nu
mb
er
of
mic
roo
rgan
ism
s (C
FU/g
)
control AgNPs
Pietrzak et al., 2016
99.4%
100%
99.9%
Mechanical parameters of paper
Sa - bleached pine kraft pulp; Sy - bleached spruce sulphite pulp; GW - bleached groundwood from spruce (GW)
PaperControl AgNPs Aged control Aged AgNPs
Elongation(%)
Tear index(mN×m2/g)
Elongation(%)
Tear index(mN×m2/g)
Elongation(%)
Tear index(mN×m2/g)
Elongation(%)
Tear index(mN×m2/g)
GW 2.4±0.2 8.1±0.3 2.8±0.2 8.1±0.5 2.2±0.1 7.5±0.2 2.1±0.2 7.2±0.8
Sy 2.0±0.1 9.3±0.8 2.4±0.2 8.6±0.4 1.9±2.2 7.6±0.4 1.8±0.2 7.2±0.3
Sa 3.0±0.2 13.5±0.9 3.1±0.2 13.9±0.4 2.6±0.1 12.9±0.3 2.6±0.1 12.8±0.4
Optical parameters of paper
R457 – ISO Brightness; Sa - bleached pine kraft pulp; Sy - bleached spruce sulphite pulp; GW - bleached groundwood from spruce
PaperControl AgNPs Aged control Aged AgNPs
R457 R457 ΔE R457 ΔE R457 ΔE
GW 82.9±0.1 82.1±0.1 0.41 78.6±0.5 1.02 78.5±0.1 0.94
Sy 89.8±0.5 89.4±0.3 1.06 85.4±0.6 0.37 85.5±0.7 1.27
Sa 90.5±0.3 89.6±0.1 0.91 87.7±0.2 0.57 87.7±0.1 0.61
0 < ∆E < 1 - observer does not notice the difference1 < ∆E < 2 - only experienced observer can notice the difference2 < ∆E < 3.5 - unexperienced observer also notices the difference3.5 < ∆E < 5 - clear difference in colour is noticed5 < ∆E - observer notices two different colours
∆𝐸 = ∆𝐿∗ 2 + ∆𝑎∗ 2 + (∆𝑏∗)2
Disinfection of historical book collections
2 books Disinfection
Lowtemperature
plasma
Thymeessential oil
AgNPs misting
Nanosilver concentration
90 ppm
Misting cycles
8
Airflow
1 m/s
Temperature25ºC
RH
90%
Duration
520 min
AgNPs misting
Disinfection effectiveness: culture-dependent
analysis
1,0E+00
1,0E+01
1,0E+02
1,0E+03
1,0E+04
1,0E+05
1,0E+06
BA BB BC BD BA BB BC BD
Nu
mb
er
of
ba
cte
ria
(CF
U/s
am
ple
)
Item (place)
Control AgNPs EOs LTP
1 4BA – front cover; BB - front free endpaper; BC – fore edge; BD – page inside the book; sample = 25 cm2
Disinfection effectiveness: culture-dependent
analysis
1,0E+00
1,0E+02
1,0E+04
1,0E+06
1,0E+08
1,0E+10
BA BB BC BD BA BB BC BD
Nu
mb
er
of
fun
gi
(CF
U/s
am
ple
)
Item (place)
Control AgNPs EOs LTP
1 4
BA – front cover; BB - front free endpaper; BC – fore edge; BD – page inside the book; sample = 25 cm2
Disinfection effectiveness: culture-
independent analysis
1 4
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
BA BB BC BD BA BB BC BD
RN
A c
on
ce
ntr
ati
on
(ng/µl)
Item (place)
control AgNPs EOs LTP
BA – front cover; BB - front free endpaper; BC – fore edge; BD – page inside the book; sample = 25 cm2
1,0E+00 1,0E+01 1,0E+02 1,0E+03
Staphylococcus succinus
Staphylococcus saprophyticus
Staphylococcus pasteuri
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Psychrobacillus psychrodurans
Microbacterium aerolatum
Bacillus licheniformis
Bacillus cereus
1,0E+00 1,0E+01 1,0E+02 1,0E+03 1,0E+00 1,0E+01 1,0E+02 1,0E+03
control
disinfection
AgNPs EOs LTP
Bacterial sensitivity
Number of microorganisms (CFU/sample)
sample = 25 cm2
Fungal sensitivity
1,0E+00 1,0E+03 1,0E+06 1,0E+09
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa
Penicillium spinulosum
Penicillium chrysogenum
Myxotrichum deflexum
Chaetomium murorum
Chaetomium globosum
Chaetomium elatum
Aspergillus niger
1,0E+00 1,0E+03 1,0E+06 1,0E+09 1,0E+00 1,0E+03 1,0E+06 1,0E+09
control
disinfection
Number of microorganisms (CFU/sample)
AgNPs EOs LTP
sample = 25 cm2
Conclusions
1. Silver nanoparticles misting, low temperature plasma and thyme essential oilmicroatmosphere were efficient methods of growth inhibition of bacteria andfungi.
2. The disinfection effectiveness depended on the inhabiting microbiota,disinfected book and the sampling place.
3. The reduction of microorganism numer equalled on Book no. 1 to: AgNPs andLTP (0–100%), EOs (0–97 %); and on Book no. 4 to: AgNPs 78–100%, LTP(25–100%) EOs 23–100%).
4. RNA concentration is a good marker to assess the disinfection effectiveness.
5. Aspergillus niger, Chaetomium globosum, Bacillus cereus andMicrobacterium aerolatum were insensitive to all disinfection methods.