simon franklin - it power - testing the performance of li-ion batteries
TRANSCRIPT
Overview
1. About ITP
2. Why test?
3. What and how are we testing?
4. Building the test Centre
5. Results website
6. Phase 2
About ITP
• Specialist renewable energy consulting firm
• Over 30 years international experience and 1,500 projects
• Offices in Australia, UK, Portugal, India, and China
Why Storage – in remote communities
• Remote sites with high fuel costs & poor fuel security
• Increase power quality and reliability
• Need to shift renewable generation to match load
• Renewable Penetration vs Contribution
RE only
Inverter
control
Power quality
storage Diesel off
storage
Other techs
required
Loss of gen
storage
Load shifting storage
Why are we testing?
Lithium-ion manufacturers claim:
•higher efficiency
•deep discharge
• longer lifetimes
•tolerance to high temperatures
• lower cost
But is that really true?
Trial Objectives
To inform future energy storage investors by
analysing the performance of six major lithium-ion
battery brands / types and comparing these to lead-
acid technologies.
• Canberra-based test centre
• Comparing six lithium-ion batteries to a
conventional lead acid battery and an advanced
lead acid battery.
• Fast charge and discharge rates
• Mimicking ‘real world’ temperatures
• Publishing performance data
What we are testing
10 of xx slides
Product Country of Origin Chemistry
Tesla USA Nickel Manganese Cobalt
Sony Fortelion Japan Lithium Iron Phosphate
LG Chem Korea Nickel Manganese Cobalt
CALB China Lithium Iron Phosphate
Samsung Korea Lithium manganese oxide
Kokam Storaxe Korea Nickel Manganese Cobalt
EcoUlt Ultraflex USA Lead acid carbon
Sonnenschein Germany Lead acid
What we are measuring
• Number of charge / discharge cycles
• State of Charge of the batteries at 15
minute intervals
• Routine battery test results of usable
battery capacity (monthly)
• Energy to / from battery banks
• Battery efficiency
• Temperature data
What we will be reporting
Detailed analysis published every six months
over the three years of the test.
• The technical performance and cost-
effectiveness
• Actual performance compared to
manufacturers’ claims
• Why some batteries may be performing
better or worse than expected
• Lessons that can be drawn about
hypothetical investment cases
Lessons Learned
• The Li-ion battery market is still evolving and is
very fluid. Some products are replaced or
discontinued
• Technical support is often not available in
Australia – sales staff do not understand their
products
• Safety requirements for batteries can add
significant cost in commercial applications
• Li-ion batteries are often only compatible with a
limited range of inverters
• Battery pack voltages can vary considerably (i.e.
many are based on the lead acid standard of 48V
while others are high voltage, e.g. Tesla.
Key things to consider
• Standardisation of communications
between BMSes and inverters is required
• Safety standards need to catch up with
current technology
• Keeping up to date on technological
developments is key, as the market is
moving so quickly.
Phase 2
• Wider range of battery technologies
• Different testing parameters
• Focus on full systems rather than just
battery packs
• Seeking interest from stakeholders
Southern Cross House,
6/9 McKay St, Turner, ACT
PO Box 6127 O’Connor, ACT 2602
p +61 (0) 2 6257 3511
f +61 (0) 2 6257 3611
itpau.com.au
IT Power Renewable Energy Consulting
Thank you for your attention