DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY

D

efining a person or behaviour as ‘abnormal’ implies

something undesirable and requiring change

T

herefore, we must be careful how we use the term

P

sychologists need methods for distinguishing ‘normal’ from

‘abnormal’

DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY

O

ur definition of abnormality must be objective:• It must not depend on anyone’s opinion or point of view• It should produce the same results whoever applies it

I

t must not be under- or over-inclusive• It must not label as ‘abnormal’ or ‘normal’ behaviours

or traits that aren’t

DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY

Y

ou MUST have an understanding of the following three

definitions for the exam:1. Deviation from social norms2. Failure to function adequately3. Deviation from ideal mental health

Y

ou could have an understanding of the following definition

for the exam:• Statistical infrequency

STATISTICAL INFREQUENCY

U

nder this definition, a person’s trait, thinking or behaviour

is classified as abnormal if it is rare or statistically

unusual.

W

ith this definition it is necessary to be clear about how

rare a trait or behaviour needs to be before we class it as

abnormal

STATISTICAL INFREQUENCY

freq

uen

cy

70 100 130

IQ Scores

Average IQ in the population is 100pts. The further from 100

you look, the fewer people you find

STATISTICAL INFREQUENCY

freq

uen

cy

70 100 130

IQ Scores

A very small subset of the population (<2.2%) have an IQ below 70pts. Such people are statistically rare. We regard them as having abnormally low IQs

DEVIATION FROM SOCIAL NORMS

U

nder this definition, a person’s thinking or behaviour is

classified as abnormal if it violates the (unwritten) rules

about what is expected or acceptable behaviour in a

particular social group.

T

heir behaviour may:• Be incomprehensible to others• Make others feel threatened or uncomfortable

DEVIATION FROM SOCIAL NORMS

W

ith this definition, it is necessary to consider:• The degree to which a norm is violated, the

importance of that norm and the value attached by the social group to different sorts of violation.

• E.g. is the violation rude, eccentric, abnormal or criminal?

FAILURE TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY

U

nder this definition, a person is considered abnormal if they

are unable to cope with the demands of everyday life.

T

hey may be unable to perform the behaviours necessary for

day-to-day living e.g. self-care, hold down a job, interact

meaningfully with others, make themselves understood etc.

FAILURE TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY

Rosenhan & Seligman (1989) suggest the following characteristics:

• Suffering• Maladaptiveness (danger to self)• Vividness & unconventionality (stands out)• Unpredictability & loss of control• Irrationality/incomprehensibility• Causes observer discomfort• Violates moral/social standards

DEVIATION FROM IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH

U

nder this definition, rather than defining what is

abnormal, we define what is normal/ideal and anything

that deviates from this is regarded as abnormal

T

his requires us to decide on the characteristics we

consider necessary to mental health

DEVIATION FROM IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH

Psychologists vary, but usual characteristics include:

• Positive view of the self• Capability for growth and development• Autonomy and independence• Accurate perception of reality• Positive friendships and relationships• Environmental mastery – able to meet the varying

demands of day-to-day situations