simplexity smart goods workshop presentation rev3
TRANSCRIPT
858-385-7834 (San Diego, CA)360-718-2573 (Vancouver, WA)
www.simplexitypd.com
NSF Workshop on Advanced Manufacturing for Smart GoodsSmart Good Needs: Small Company Perspective
Dorota ShortellMay 14, 2015
Pushing the Limits of Smart Products Design
www.simplexitypd.com2Copyright 2015
Simplexity Overview
• Engineering design company with 2 locations: Vancouver, WA and San Diego CA
• Believe the best solution is the simplest one to accomplish the goal reliably
• Experts in mechatronics, sensor-integrated smart products, and precision motion control
• ~50 employees, listed on over 100 patents
• Mechanical, firmware, electrical, manufacturing and software engineers averaging 20 years’ experience
www.simplexitypd.com3Copyright 2015
Goals for this talk
1. What smart goods applications is Simplexity helping customers with today?
2. What are the limitations of current technologies?
3. What is in store for the future in smart goods?
www.simplexitypd.com4Copyright 2015
Outline
1. Simplexity Overview & Goals
2. Case Study 1: The Microsoft Band
3. Case Study 2: Bowflex® SelectTech 560 Dumbbells Get Smarter
4. Looking to the Future: From Sensing to Affecting
www.simplexitypd.com5Copyright 2015
Case Study 1: The Microsoft Band
What is it?• Wearable device for your wrist
• Full health and exercise tracking
• Syncs to WindowsPhone, Android, and iPhone
• Shows email previews, calendar alerts, incoming calls & texts
• Contains guided workouts, automatic activity counting, run, and bike mapping with built-in GPS
• Tracks sleep: total sleep time, sleep efficiency, wake-ups
Lots of features, not size
www.simplexitypd.com6Copyright 2015
Case Study 1: The Microsoft Band
Technical Challenges1. Compact size
2. Water and sweat resistance
3. Industrial design
4. Human factors/ Ergonomics
5. Safety
6. Durability
www.simplexitypd.com7Copyright 2015
Optical heart rate sensor
3-axis accelerometer
GyroGPS
Ambient light sensor
Skin temperature sensor
UV sensor
Galvanic skin response
Microphone
Haptic vibration motor
DisplayCase Study 1: The Microsoft Band
www.simplexitypd.com8Copyright 2015
Case Study 1: The Microsoft Band
Manufacturing Advances1. Insert molded Stainless Steel Metal Injection Molding (SS MIMS)
Strict geometric constraints, tight tolerance requirements, and a need for high strength eliminated more traditional forms of manufacturing for a few critical parts
Combining detailed Finite Element Analyses (FEA) with vendor research, SS MIMS process was selected and designed for in order to provide a successful substrate. ABS/PC is then shot onto the substrate to provide more reliable profile accuracy and a TPE-compatible interface
Working with MIMs vendors and clever design, part cost was able to be brought down to acceptable large-scale levels
www.simplexitypd.com9Copyright 2015
Case Study 1: The Microsoft Band
Manufacturing Advances2. Integrated Flex Circuit
Waterproof, sweatproof, and safety requirements demanded creative solutions for Flexible Printed Circuit (FPC) and battery integration
Insert molding directly to the FPC allowed contact potting and gasket sealing with ease of assembly, high positional accuracy, and a flexibility in materials
www.simplexitypd.com10Copyright 2015
Case Study 1: The Microsoft Band
Manufacturing Advances3. Complex Sheet Metal Substrates
The main band substrate provides a complex yet critical “backbone” to support and locate all other subassemblies of the device
More expensive and fragile techniques have been common among competitive products but using thin, spring-hardened sheet metal allowed for design complexity, excellent feature accuracy, and high strength at a very low cost
www.simplexitypd.com11Copyright 2015
Case Study 1: The Microsoft Band
Challenges1. Compact size
2. Water and sweat resistance
3. Industrial design
4. Human factors/ Ergonomics
5. Safety
6. Durability
Solutions1. New manufacturing processes, metal instead of
plastic for backbone, FPC and cross-team cooperation
2. FPC insert molding and TPE overmolding for integrated gasket features, sealing of components
3. Compact latching, curved cover over display, many trials with overmolding
4. User studies, market and trial research with cross-team collaboration
5. Creative sealing techniques along with complex battery housing design
6. Sheet metal backbone for strength & flexibility, FEA analyses and testing (drop, pull, twist)
www.simplexitypd.com12Copyright 2015
Case Study 1: The Microsoft Band
Needs in Technology • Miniaturization of common smart goods components e.g.
accelerometers, gyros, cameras, batteries, etc.
• Advancements in FPC trace density, flexibility, and available components/features
• Display size, shape, and flexibility
www.simplexitypd.com13Copyright 2015
Case Study 2: Bowflex® SelectTech560 Dumbbells get smarter
What is it?• An entire rack of dumbbells in one
• Selectively choose how much weight each holds
New features• Tracks sets, reps & weight
• Integrated Bluetooth Low Energy communications
• Syncs and records sets, reps and weight
• SelectTech ® 560 3DT Workout App for iOS and Android
www.simplexitypd.com14Copyright 2015
Technical Challenges1. Battery Life
2. Positional Accuracy
Case Study 2: Bowflex® SelectTech 560 Dumbbells get smarter
www.simplexitypd.com15Copyright 2015
Case Study 2: Bowflex® SelectTech560 Dumbbells get smarter
Technical Solutions1. Battery Life
Use of low power embedded ARM CPU & optimization of CPU power usage.
Minimization of active time for all sensors: weight and accel/gyro
2. Positional Accuracy Auto switching between rotational
and translational exercises. Filtering & continuous calibration for
translational exercises. Note: representative data, not actual
Note: representative data, not actual
www.simplexitypd.com16Copyright 2015
Needs in Technology• Low Power Sensors
Power technology moving in the right direction. Sensors still consume significant power: 50% more than CPU (and CPU is oversized for this application due to memory requirements).
• Low cost position measurement system Especially one that works at low frequency. The orientation
problem is adequately solved, but position only works for cyclic motions of sufficient speed.
Case Study 2: Bowflex® SelectTech560 Dumbbells get smarter
www.simplexitypd.com17Copyright 2015
Looking to the Future: From Sensing to Affecting
• Very limited ability of today’s products to manipulate the real world
• The next wave of smart products need to manipulate their environment based on their sensors
• Key challenges: Low cost & energy efficient manipulators: motors, solenoids, etc.
Manipulator + feedback sensor integration
Energy distribution / energy harvesting
Easy-to-use security
• Majority of “smart products” today are centered on internet connected sensors
• Products great at gathering data from the real world