single-dish continuum brian mason (nrao) nrao/naic single-dish summer school july 13, 2009 basics...
TRANSCRIPT
Single-Dish Continuum
Brian Mason (NRAO)NRAO/NAIC Single-Dish Summer School
July 13, 2009
• Basics• Issues
• Confusion• gain fluctuations• atmosphere
• Receiver architectures & observing strategies•The future: large arrays
Flux D
ensi
ty (
Jy)
ZSPEC (Caltech Submillimeter Observatory)
€
ΔT =Tsys
tΔνRotational Transitions
Of CO
Thermal emission from
dust
CCH, HCN…
M82
See Condon (1992, ARA&A)
Stellar deathMagnetic fields
Stellar birthdust
synchrotron
Thermal BB
Free-Free
Dust emission from galaxies at at high redshift
HDF-- Hughes et al. (1998)
• Discovered an abundant population of submm galaxies at z~1-3
• 50 hr map with the JCMT at 850 m, confusion limited
The confusion amplitude P(D) distribution [for n(s) = dN/ds=kS-2.1]
D = image brightness (e.g., Jy/beam)Condon (1974); Scheuer (1956)
€
γ=−2.5Euclidean:
The confusion amplitude P(D) distribution [for n(s) = dN/ds=kS-2.1]
D = 0 mean is not a good baseline; use running median instead Long tail --> use at least 5 sigma threshold (src/30 beams)
€
γ=−2.5Euclidean:
The 5σ extragalactic confusion limits forArecibo (d = 220 m) and the GBT (d = 100 m).
Gets much weaker with increasing frequency:
The noise level won’t go below this if you integrate for longer.
€
θFWHM ∝1
ν
€
S ≈ ν −0.8
A Simple Picture of Gain Fluctuations
€
G(t1){TSRC + TRX + TATM }
€
G(t2){TRX + TATM }
€
On −Off =G(t1)TSRC + ΔG(TRX + TSKY )
Extra Noise Term (Contributes to baseline ripple for S.L.)
Suppose TSRC << TRX
€
ΔGG<ΔT
T=
1
Δντ≈ 3×10−5
Stability requirement in order that gain fluctuations cause smaller changes in the output than thermal noise:
(1 sec, 1 GHz bw) - too small to be accurately measured each second --> mitigate with instrument design
Why not calibrate the fluctuations away?
Atmospheric Emission
€
G{TSRC + TRX + TATM (t1)}
€
G{TRX + TATM (t2)}
€
On −Off =GΔTSKY
How fast do G(t), TATM(t) vary?
Sky emission often adds noise to continuum measurements, so you need to measure your noise instead of assuming the radiometer equation or formal uncertainties!
Postdetection power spectrum of the receiver output
νk
Gaussian, uncorrelated Noise (Radiometer Equation):White (flat) power spectrum
Atmosphere & gainFluctuations: 1/f Power spectrum
How does kdepend on bandwidth?
νk
νk
Less bandwidth
More bandwidth
Eliminate bad fluctuating signals by independently measuring the bad signal on some timescale or shorter. Use < 1/(2πνk): Dicke switching, chopping, multi pixel, etc..
Characteristic Timescales for Broadband Measurements
Gain fluct. For coherent amplifiers: 100+ Hz– receiver architecture
•incoherent (bolometer) detectors: 0.1-10 Hz•Atmosphere 0.1-few Hz
– chopping or rapid scanning– common mode subtraction for imaging arrays
Dicke-Switching Receiver
Rapidly alternate between feed horns to achieve theoretical noise performance. (old-fashioned receiver architecture but good illustration, & same principle as “chopping”)
€
ΔP =G(V12 −V2
2)
€
G{TSRC + TRX + TATM }
€
G{TRX + TATM }
€
On −Off =GTSRC + (ΔG = 0)(TRX + TSKY )
For TSRC<<TSYS gain fluctuations don’t contribute significantly to the noise
Dicke-Switching Receiver
Rapidly alternate between feed horns to achieve theoretical noise performance
€
ΔP =G(V12 −V2
2)
€
ΔT = T1 −T2
RMS(ΔT) = 2 × RMS(T1)
= 2T1Δντ 1
=2T1Δντ Tot
Penalty:–Differential sky measurement–2x higher thermal noise
Dicke-Switching Receiver
What happens if the feeds seeslightly different things?
€
ΔP =G(V12 −V2
2)
€
G {TSRC + TRX + TATM }
€
G {TRX + TATM + TOFF}
€
On −Off =G TSRC +GTOFF
Components before the switch must be as identical + well matched as possible.
An Easier Way?
€
A − B =G1TSRC + ΔG(TRX + TSKY )
Primarily you switch to suppress receiver effects.Switch must be before active (unstable) components
Correlation Receiver
Receiver noise is uncorrelated and drops out.
Always looking at both source & reference: only lose one sqrt(2) for differencing
Correlation Polarimeter
See talk by Carl Heiles
€
I = L2 + R2
V = L2 − R2
Q = −Re(< LR >)
U = Im(< LR >)
Higher-Order Differences: Symmetric Nodding
• For sensitive photometry, one level of differencing is usually not enough– Gradient in sky emission, or with time– Dual-feed systems: Slight differences in feedhorn gains or
losses
Bolometers
Bolometer detectors• Incoherent; measure total power• Very broad bandwidths possible; approach quantum - limited noise.• Can be built in very large-format arrays!
MUSTANG (18 GHz)
Bolometersθ
adjacent pixels
4″ 98%
40km
Across array
32″
98%
5km
(principle also applies to dual pixel heterodyne receivers & FPAs)
MUSTANG (18 GHz)
ALFA
ALFA on Arecibo 7-element λ = 21 cm coherent array, 3 arcmin resolution GALFACTS:full-Stokes , sensitive, high-resolution survey of 12,000 deg^2
Galactic magnetic fields, ISM, SNR, HII regions, molecular clouds …
Large Format Heterodyne Arrays QUIET
• 91 pixels• I,Q,U• 90 GHz• integrated, mass-producable “receiver on a chip” (MMIC)
T. Gaier (JPL)
Large Format Heterodyne Arrays QUIET
• 91 pixels• I,Q,U• 90 GHz• integrated, mass-producable “receiver on a chip” (MMIC)
OCRA• 1-cm Receiver Array• Under construction at Jodrell Bank, initially for Torun 30m telescope
• SZ surveys + imaging• 16 --> 100 pixels• correlation architecture T. Gaier (JPL)
Millimeter
Bolocam/AZTEC• 1-2 mm• 144 pixels• CSO (10m) & LMT (50m)
Also IRAM 30m, APEX
ACT (6m) , SPT (10M)• 1-2 mm• Large Area Surveys (SZ) - 1000s of deg^2• few 1000 detectors
Sub-millimeter
SCUBA-2• JCMT (15m)• ~10,000 pixels!• SQUID-MUX’d TES bolometers (CCD-like)• Under commissioning now
Also: SHARC-II on CSO, 384 pixels at 350 um
MUSTANGGBT 3.3mm Bolometer Array
Prototype for a 1000-pixel class camera
Maping Speed >15x ALMA
Thermal Dust + Free-Free EmissionIn Orion KL/Integral FilamentRegion.
MUSTANGGBT 3.3mm Bolometer Array
Prototype for a 1000-pixel class camera
SZE in RXJ1347-1145
User instruments
Maping Speed >15x ALMA
Performance MeasuresFrom before:
An effective aperture of 2760 m2 is required to give a sensitivity of 1.0 K/Jy.
€
TAnt =Aeff
2kSSrc →Γ ≡
TAnt
SSrc
=Aeff
2k Gain
€
SNR =TAnt
ΔT∝Γ
TSys
Units of 1/Janskys. You sometimes seeThe System-Equivalent Flux Density,SEFD (small is good)
“Mapping Speed” commonly defined as:
€
MappingSpeed =Area
(noise)2(time)
These are single-pixel measures. For mapping, increase by Nfeeds.
Gain Effects: deviations from linearity
Input Power
Outp
ut
Pow
erIdeal
Gain compression/saturation
TRx
Integrated power is what usually matters(RFI)
Gain Effects: deviations from linearity
Input Power
Outp
ut
Pow
erIdeal
Gain compression/saturation
Be aware of the limitations of the instrumentYou’re using & calibrate at a similar total power Level to what your science observations will see.
TRx
Integrated power is what usually matters(RFI)
Gain Effects: fluctuations
Gain drifts over the course of an observingSession(s) easily removed with instrumentalCalibrators (e.g., noise diodes)
Short term gain fluctuations can be more Problematic. (see continuum lecture)
Sampling/Quantization & DynamicRange: Postdetection
Diode or square law detector:Turns E-field into some outputProportional to power (E2)
A/D2N levels(N~14)
.
.
.
Common for continuum systems.
Robust & simple (large dynamic range)
€
ΔP =P
Δντ
A/D sample time
~1 level
€
≈2NΔP
Sampling/Quantization & DynamicRange: PredetectionSample the E-field itself.
Samplers must be much faster and sample much more corasely (typically just a few levels)
Dynamic range limitations more important One usually requires variable attenuators to get it right (“Balancing”).
Small # of levels increases the noise level. (K-factor in Radiometer equation)
More levels -> greater dynamic range (RFI robustness), greater sensitivity
Monitor levels through your observation.