site testing at dome fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy… · 2017-01-25 · site...

9
Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency S. Ishii a, * , M. Seta a , N. Nakai a , S. Nagai a , N. Miyagawa a , A. Yamauchi b , H. Motoyama c , M. Taguchi d a Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Ten-nodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan b Mizusawa VERA Observatory, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan c National Institute of Polar Research, 10-3 Midoricho, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-8518, Japan d Department of Physics, College of Science, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishiikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo 171-8, Japan Received 18 December 2008; revised 15 July 2009; accepted 10 August 2009 Available online 21 August 2009 Abstract We measured the 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency at the Dome Fuji station in Antarctica from 18 December 2006 to 14 January 2007 using a tipping radiometer. The mean optical depth at zenith was 0.045 0.007, and during 98% of this period we measured an optical depth of less than 0.06. These data indicate that the atmospheric-transparency in summer at Dome Fuji is comparable to that of well-known submillimeter astronomical sites such as the Atacama desert in Chile in their best seasons. Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. and NIPR. All rights reserved. Keywords: Submillimeter and terahertz astronomy; Site testing; Atmospheric opacity 1. Introduction There are many astronomically important spectral lines of atoms, molecules, and ions in the submillimeter and terahertz frequency ranges, some of which are listed in Table 1. Recently, radio-receiver technology has been developed to take advantage of higher-frequency bands and it is now possible to construct submillimeter and terahertz radio telescopes. However, submillimeter observations can be obtained only at dry and high- altitude sites such as Mauna Kea in Hawaii, the Atacama desert in northern Chile, Gornergrat in Switzerland, Mt. Graham in Arizona, and the South Pole, because of improved atmospheric-transparency in the presence of reduced quantities of water vapor and oxygen. The atmospheric attenuation is mainly determined by the amount of water vapor and oxygen, and is expressed by the atmospheric optical depth. The atmospheric- transparency at these sites is not sufficiently low for terahertz astronomy; drier and higher-altitude sites are preferable. The Antarctic Plateau may be the best location on earth for astronomical observations in the terahertz band. Site testing has been performed or is currently taking place on the Antarctic Plateau at the South Pole, Dome C, and Dome A (e.g., Lane, 1998; Lawrence, 2004). The Japanese Antarctic station, Dome Fuji (77 19 0 S, 39 42 0 E) is located at an altitude of 3810 m * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ81 29 853 5600 8299; fax: þ81 29 853 6618. E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Ishii). 1873-9652/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. and NIPR. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.polar.2009.08.001 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Polar Science 3 (2010) 213e221 http://ees.elsevier.com/polar/

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy… · 2017-01-25 · Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Polar Science 3 (2010) 213e221http://ees.elsevier.com/polar/

Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertzastronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency

S. Ishii a,*, M. Seta a, N. Nakai a, S. Nagai a, N. Miyagawa a, A. Yamauchi b,H. Motoyama c, M. Taguchi d

a Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Ten-nodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japanb Mizusawa VERA Observatory, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan

c National Institute of Polar Research, 10-3 Midoricho, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-8518, Japand Department of Physics, College of Science, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishiikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo 171-8, Japan

Received 18 December 2008; revised 15 July 2009; accepted 10 August 2009

Available online 21 August 2009

Abstract

We measured the 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency at the Dome Fuji station in Antarctica from 18 December 2006 to14 January 2007 using a tipping radiometer. The mean optical depth at zenith was 0.045� 0.007, and during 98% of this period wemeasured an optical depth of less than 0.06. These data indicate that the atmospheric-transparency in summer at Dome Fuji iscomparable to that of well-known submillimeter astronomical sites such as the Atacama desert in Chile in their best seasons.� 2009 Elsevier B.V. and NIPR. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Submillimeter and terahertz astronomy; Site testing; Atmospheric opacity

1. Introduction

There are many astronomically important spectrallines of atoms, molecules, and ions in the submillimeterand terahertz frequency ranges, some of which are listedin Table 1. Recently, radio-receiver technology has beendeveloped to take advantage of higher-frequency bandsand it is now possible to construct submillimeter andterahertz radio telescopes. However, submillimeterobservations can be obtained only at dry and high-altitude sites such as Mauna Kea in Hawaii, the Atacamadesert in northern Chile, Gornergrat in Switzerland,

* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ81 29 853 5600 8299; fax: þ81 29

853 6618.

E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Ishii).

1873-9652/$ - see front matter � 2009 Elsevier B.V. and NIPR. All rights

doi:10.1016/j.polar.2009.08.001

Mt. Graham in Arizona, and the South Pole, because ofimproved atmospheric-transparency in the presence ofreduced quantities of water vapor and oxygen. Theatmospheric attenuation is mainly determined by theamount of water vapor and oxygen, and is expressedby the atmospheric optical depth. The atmospheric-transparency at these sites is not sufficiently low forterahertz astronomy; drier and higher-altitude sites arepreferable. The Antarctic Plateau may be the bestlocation on earth for astronomical observations in theterahertz band. Site testing has been performed or iscurrently taking place on the Antarctic Plateau at theSouth Pole, Dome C, and Dome A (e.g., Lane, 1998;Lawrence, 2004).

The Japanese Antarctic station, Dome Fuji(77�190S, 39�420E) is located at an altitude of 3810 m

reserved.

Page 2: Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy… · 2017-01-25 · Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency

Table 1

Astronomically important spectral lines in the THz frequency range.

Frequency Line Target

461.0 GHz CO(J¼ 4� 3) Warm and dense

molecular clouds

492.2 GHz [CI] 3P1� 3P0 Diffuse gas around

molecular clouds

806.7 GHz CO (J¼ 7� 6) Hot and dense

cores in molecular clouds

809.3 GHz [CI] (3P1� 3P0) Diffuse gas around

molecular clouds

921.8 GHz CO (J¼ 8� 7) Hot and dense

cores in molecular clouds

1037 GHz CO (J¼ 9� 8) Hot and dense

cores in molecular clouds

1267 GHz CO (J¼ 11� 10) Hot and dense

cores in molecular clouds

1382 GHz CO (J¼ 12� 11) Hot and dense

cores in molecular clouds

1463 GHz [NII] (3P1� 3P0) Ionized diffuse gas

1497 GHz CO (J¼ 13� 12) Hot and dense

cores in molecular clouds

1902 GHz [CII] (3P3/2� 3P1/2) Strong line

in galaxies

1956 GHz CO (J¼ 18� 17) Hot and dense

cores in molecular clouds

214 S. Ishii et al. / Polar Science 3 (2010) 213e221

on a plateau halfway between the South Pole and theocean (Fig. 1; Watanabe et al., 1999). The annualaverage temperature at the station is �54.4 �C, and thelowest ever temperature was �79.7 �C (Yamanouchiet al., 2003). Because of the combination of lowtemperature and high altitude, a very small opticaldepth is expected at Dome Fuji. In addition, theaverage fraction of the sky obscured by clouds over the

Fig. 1. Location of Dome Fuji in Antarctica.

period 1995e1997 was just 30% (Yamanouchi et al.,2003). The mean wind speed is 5.8 m s�1 (Yamanouchiet al., 2003), rarely exceeding 10 m s�1. These stableweather conditions are advantageous for the accuratepointing of telescopes and practical observing time.

We plan to construct astronomical telescopes at DomeFuji. Measurement of the atmospheric-transparency isa first step toward developing submillimeter and ter-ahertz astronomy at the station. Optical-depth measure-ments at 220 GHz are useful for comparison with otherobservatory sites, because many optical-depth recordsare available (e.g., Chamberlin and Bally, 1994; Otarolaet al., 2005; Radford, 2002). In this paper, we report onatmospheric-transparency measurements at 220 GHzobtained at Dome Fuji.

2. Instruments

The atmospheric-transparency at zenith wasmeasured with a 220 GHz tipping radiometer. Theradiometer is an instrument capable of observing thebrightness temperature of the sky using a narrow beampointing toward a certain elevation angle. Figs. 2 and 3show a block diagram of the radiometer system and itsappearance, respectively. The radiometer was designedto operate at the low temperatures prevalent at DomeFuji. It was developed by modifying the 220 GHzradiometer used for site testing at the Atacama LargeMillimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) site (Kohnoet al., 1995). An offset 83 mm (diameter) parabolicmirror with a corrugated feed horn at its focusproduced a narrow beam of 63 arc minutes diameter.A stepping motor controlled the mirror’s rotationaround the elevation axis.

We employed heterodyne detection, which gener-ates down-conversion of higher-frequency to interme-diate-frequency (IF) signals, because direct detectionof the 220 GHz signal was difficult. A GaAs Schottky-barrier diode harmonic mixer produced an IF signal at1.2e1.6 GHz by mixing the signal from the sky witha second harmonics of local signal. The local signal at109.13 GHz was generated by a Gunn oscillator.The mixer operated in double-sideband (DSB) mode sothat the IF signal at 1.2e1.6 GHz contained the skysignal in both sidebands at 219.28e219.68 and216.84e217.24 GHz. The IF signal was detected bya power meter and subsequently recorded usinga personal computer. Receiver sensitivity is expressedby the equivalent noise temperature. The receiver noisetemperature was evaluated based on the Y-factormethod, which measures the difference in response ofthe receiver when its input port is terminated by hot

Page 3: Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy… · 2017-01-25 · Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency

PowerSensor(Agilent E9301A)

PowerMeter (Agilent E4418B)

GPIB

Elevationmotor

AntennaDriver

GPIB

Zitex

GPIB(General Purpose Interface Bus) cable

Electrical PowerSupply

ShockSensor

100V/5VConverter

100V/15VConverter

Electrical Power Supply cable

1.2-1.6 GHz

109.13GHz

Main Reflector

Horn Mixer Amplifier

Fig. 2. Block diagram of the 220 GHz radiometer.

215S. Ishii et al. / Polar Science 3 (2010) 213e221

and cold loads. The noise temperature was 1200 K,which is low enough to observe typical emission fromthe atmosphere for an integration time of 2 s.

The radiometer was covered by metal with ther-mally insulating material, except for the signalwindow. The window was sealed by a 250 mm-thinZitex (porous Teflon) sheet. The measured loss of0.009 dB at 220 GHz is negligible for this observation.Electrical heaters were installed on a motor and innerframe of the radiometer. We kept the temperature ofthe radiometer above �15 �C during the operation, atan average ambient temperature of �30 �C at DomeFuji. Electrical parts of the radiometer were placed in

Fig. 3. Photograph of the radiometer.

the inner frame, which is separated from the outerframe by elastic material so as to minimize vibrationduring transportation.

3. Observations

The radiometer was packed into a paper box of60 cm (width)� 86 cm (length)� 96 cm (height), witha total mass of 64 kg. The instrument was returned toJapan without damage.

The radiometer was placed on a base frame on snowat Dome Fuji (Fig. 4). Its pointing reference plane wasset with an accuracy of better than 0.1�. The tipping

Fig. 4. Radiometer at Dome Fuji (bottom right).

Page 4: Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy… · 2017-01-25 · Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency

Fig. 6. Zenith optical depth at 220 GHz measured at Dome Fuji.

Spurious data were removed, as they contain noise due to interfer-

ence from satellite communications and the incidence of scattered

sunlight. The data for 25 December and 9e11 January are missing

because the radiometer was out of operation during these periods.

216 S. Ishii et al. / Polar Science 3 (2010) 213e221

scan direction was chosen from the zenith to the south,to minimize any effects due to solar radiation. We putmetal plates on the eastern and western sides ofthe mirror to avoid stray sunlight; however, it wasdifficult to protect the atmospheric data from the directincidence of sunlight from the southenorth direction(i.e., the direction perpendicular to the mirror’srotational axis); thus, data affected by sunlight werediscarded. The scanning mirror was programmed toscan the sky every 2 min with a zenith angle betweenZ¼ 0 (sec Z¼ 1.0) and 70.5� (sec Z¼ 3.0) at intervalsof 0.1 in sec Z. Fig. 5 shows an example of one datascan. The zenith optical depth, t0, was derived byreducing the data for one scan (see Appendix A).The radiometer was in operation from 18 December2006 to 14 January 2007 at Dome Fuji, in the summerseason in the Southern Hemisphere.

4. Results and discussion

4.1. Atmospheric-transparency

Fig. 6 shows the 220 GHz optical depth for 27 daysfrom 18 December 2006, and Fig. 7 presents a histo-gram of the data. In the figures, two sources of spuriousemission were removed. One of these sources wasspike-like and appeared every 3 h; it was identifiedas originating from satellite communications. The

-17.65

-17.6

-17.55

-17.5

-17.45

1 2 3

ln{ P

ref

-P( Z

)}

secZ

Fig. 5. Example of the tipping scan data measured at Dome Fuji.

Open circles represent the observed output power of the radiometer at

220 GHz for a specified zenith angle, Z. Pref� P is the output radio

power at Z subtracted from the power of a reference load. The solid

line is the least-squares fit to Equation (10). The line’s proportion-

ality constant corresponds to the optical depth; it is derived to be

0.045.

other was scattered sunlight at midnight. Some data inthe observing period were unavailable because theradiometer was out of service due to maintenance andpower failure. The average optical depth was 0.045,with a standard deviation of 0.007, during the entiremeasurement period. This small deviation means thatthe optical depth was very stable at Dome Fuji. Fig. 8shows the cumulative distribution of the optical depth,corresponding to the percentage of the optical depthbelow a specified value.

Fig. 7. Histogram of the 220 GHz optical depth at Dome Fuji.

The data set is the same as that used in Fig. 6.

Page 5: Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy… · 2017-01-25 · Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency

Fig. 8. Cumulative distribution of the 220 GHz optical depth at

Dome Fuji (solid line). Data from the Atacama desert in Chile, given

in Table 2, are superimposed (dashed lines).

217S. Ishii et al. / Polar Science 3 (2010) 213e221

The 220 GHz optical depth correlates with thesubmillimeter atmospheric optical depth (Chamberlinet al., 1997; Hirota et al., 1998; Masson, 1994; Matsuoet al., 1998). The submillimeter optical depths observedat 495, 670, and 820 GHz were almost the same asthose observed at Mauna Kea and in the Atacama desert(Masson, 1994; Matsushita et al., 1999). The opticaldepth t495 at 495 GHz was estimated empirically fromt220 (obtained at 220 GHz) by

t495xat220þ b ð1Þ

where a and b are constants optimized for the obser-vations. We use this equation to estimate the opticaldepth t495 at Dome Fuji from the 220 GHz measure-ments, adopting a¼ 23.28 and b¼�0.37. We adopt theaverage values at the South Pole for a and b (Cham-berlin et al., 1997) because of the similarity in climatebetween the South Pole and Dome Fuji. Astronomicalobservations become difficult above zenith opticaldepth of 1.0 because of strong atmospheric attenuation.

Table 2

220/225 GHz optical depths at Dome Fuji and other sites.

Quartile Dome Fuji South Polea

Summer Best winter Best summer

Dec 06eJan 07 ApreSep 93 Oct 93eMar 94

1st (25%) 0.041 0.040 0.052

2nd (50%) 0.045 0.046 0.062

3rd (75%) 0.050 0.055 0.076

a Chamberlin and Bally (1994), Chamberlin et al. (1997), Lane (1998).b http://www.alma.nrao.edu/development/site/Chajnantor/data.c.html.c Hogg (1992), Lane (1998).

According to Equation (1), a zenith optical depth oft495¼ 1.0 corresponds to t220¼ 0.06. A zenith opticaldepth, t220 of less than 0.06 corresponds to 0.98 in thecumulative distribution shown in Fig. 8. This findingindicates that submillimeter observations are alwayspossible at Dome Fuji, even in summer. We note thatEquation (1) and the coefficients a and b at Dome Fujimay be different from those at South Pole; thus, it isimportant to undertake direct measurements of therelation between t220 and t495 at Dome Fuji.

4.2. Comparison of optical depth at other sites

Table 2 lists the quartiles of the cumulative distri-bution of the 220 GHz optical depth measured at DomeFuji, together with data from other sites at 225 GHz,including the ALMA site in Chile (altitude, 5060 m),the South Pole (2835 m), and Mauna Kea in Hawaii(4100 m), taken from the literature (Chamberlin andBally, 1994; Hogg, 1992; Otarola et al., 2005). Thefrequency dependence of the optical depth between220 and 225 GHz is small, at less than 3% of thetabulated values (Radford et al., 2001). In addition,there is an annual variance of the quartiles at the othersites. Therefore, Table 2 gives the data obtained in theseason when the best median value was recorded.It is clear that the optical depth at Dome Fuji is smallerthan that at Mauna Kea in all seasons. This can beexplained by the difference in the amount of watervapor (i.e., extremely dry conditions at Dome Fuji).The precipitable water vapor (pwv) at Dome Fuji isestimated at 0.6 mm during the observing period (seeSection 4.3), while the average pwv for Mauna Kea is2.3 mm (Lane, 1998). The quartiles of the cumulativeoptical depth at Dome Fuji are smaller than those at theSouth Pole in summer, reflecting the difference inaltitude. Dome Fuji’s altitude of 3810 m is approxi-mately 1000 m higher than that at the South Pole(2835 m). The quartiles at Dome Fuji in summer are

Atacamab Mauna Keac

Best winter Best summer Best Worst

ApreSep 99 Oct 03eMar 04 MareJun 91 OcteDec 89

0.029 0.040 0.046 0.064

0.040 0.066 0.069 0.140

0.065 0.131 0.121 0.263

Page 6: Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy… · 2017-01-25 · Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency

218 S. Ishii et al. / Polar Science 3 (2010) 213e221

comparable to those at the South Pole, even in winter.This leads to the conclusion that the atmosphericoptical depth at Dome Fuji is superior to those at bothMauna Kea and the South Pole.

Recently, many submillimeter telescopes have beenconstructed in the Atacama desert in Chile. We nowcompare the detailed atmospheric properties at Dome Fujiwith those in the Atacama desert. Fig. 9 shows temporalvariations in optical depth at Dome Fuji and in the Ata-cama desert. The data for the Atacama consist of the bestrecords obtained from 1995 to 2004 (data are from http://www.alma.nrao.edu/development/site/Chajnantor/data.c.html). One remarkable advantage of Dome Fuji is thestability of the optical depth in the summer season, asshown in Fig. 9(a) and (b). The standard deviation of theoptical depth was 0.007 at Dome Fuji, while it was 0.07 inthe Atacama desert. Water vapor has a strong influence onoptical depth. Bad weather in Chile causes large opticaldepths and high standard deviations in summer, whereasthe weather is always fine at Dome Fuji. The difference instability is confirmed by the large difference in the secondquartile of the cumulative optical depth (see Table 2).Furthermore, the winter optical depth in the Atacamadesert is comparable to the summer optical depth at DomeFuji, as shown in Fig. 9(a) and (c), although the bestoptical depth in the Atacama is better than that at DomeFuji (see Fig. 8 and the first quartile of Table 2).

The similarity between the winter optical depth inthe Atacama and the summer optical depth at DomeFuji suggests that the combined conditions of highaltitude and low temperature are comparable in termsof optical depth. The winter temperature at theAtacama’s altitude of 5060 m is about �10 �C, whilethe summer temperature at Dome Fuji’s altitude of3810 m is �30 �C, but the low average pressure

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

23 28Date (2

12/1712/17 23 28 1/3 1/8 14Date (2006-2007)

Dome Fuji(summer)

Atacama(summer)

a b

Fig. 9. Comparison of variations in the 220/225 GHz optical depth between

(17 December 2006e14 January 2007), (b) Atacama in best summer (17

(17 August 1999e14 September 1999).

(598.6 hPa) at Dome Fuji (Yamanouchi et al., 2003)corresponds to an altitude of 4300 m at mid-latitudes.The Atacama’s higher altitude is advantageous in termsof reduced levels of atmospheric constituents such aswater vapor and oxygen, which absorb radio waves.Low temperatures at Dome Fuji have both positive andnegative effects on the optical depth: they reduce theamount of water vapor in the atmosphere but alsocause absorption of atmospheric constituents at lowenergy levels because of changes in the partitionfunction (Pardo et al., 2001). Our results suggest thatlow temperatures are beneficial overall in terms ofobtaining small optical depths at Dome Fuji.

Dome Fuji may be of use for rapid astronomicalmapping of large areas, even for similar optical depths,because the noise generated by fluctuations in theoptical depth is small at Dome Fuji (Fig. 9). It shouldbe noted that extremely low optical depths have beenrecorded in the Atacama desert in winter, as shown bythe small value of the first quartile in Table 2. Indeed,very low optical depth (<0.03) is only available in theAtacama, as shown in the cumulative diagram ofFig. 8. In winter, the 220 GHz optical depth at DomeFuji is expected to be very low, due to dry conditionsand low pressure; thus, we can regard the present dataas an upper limit of the annual variation of the opticaldepth. We conclude that the atmospheric-transparencyat Dome Fuji is better than that at any other sitespresently available for submillimeter astronomy.

4.3. Simulated spectrum of transparency

We simulated spectra of the atmospheric-transparencywith the ‘‘am’’ program (Paine, 2004). The programsimulates the transparency as a function of frequency

8/17 23 28 9/3 8 14Date (1999)

1/3 8 14002-2003)

Atacama(winter)

c

Dome. Fuji and the Atacama ALMA site. (a) Dome Fuji in summer

December 2002e14 January 2003), and (c) Atacama in best winter

Page 7: Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy… · 2017-01-25 · Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

Tran

spar

ency

Frequency [THz]

winter (pwv=50μm)

Fig. 11. Simulated spectrum of the atmospheric-transparency at

Dome Fuji under the expected best conditions (pwv¼ 50 mm).

219S. Ishii et al. / Polar Science 3 (2010) 213e221

by calculating the radiative transfer equation for anatmosphere model consisting of several planeeparallellayers. Each layer is characterized by uniform pressure,temperature, and column density of oxygen, ozone,nitrogen, and water vapor. We used the data of high-altitude pressure and temperature measured withradiosondes at Dome Fuji (Hirasawa et al., 1999; Sato,1999). In addition, we used the U.S. standard atmo-sphere (1976) to obtain the column density of oxygen,ozone, and nitrogen at each pressure. The columndensity of water vapor in a given layer was calculatedfrom pwv, assuming hydrostatic equilibrium. pwvlinearly correlates with optical depth at 220 GHz(Chamberlin and Bally, 1994; Masson, 1994); conse-quently, we used pwv as a parameter in the simulation.Fig. 10 shows a simulated spectrum of the atmospheric-transparency for 0.6 mm of pwv, which reproduces theobserved average 220 GHz optical depth of 0.045 atDome Fuji in summer (transparency of 0.96). Despitethe summer conditions, the spectrum maintains a hightransparency up to a frequency of 0.5 THz and has‘‘windows’’ at 0.68 and 0.85 THz.

Lawrence (2004) simulated the atmospheric-transparency at infrared and submillimeter wavelengthsat Dome Fuji, assuming 105 mm of pwv. Our modelreproduces his results with higher resolution in termsof the frequency range of the atmospheric windows andthe peak transparency of each window.

We also show the simulated spectrum for the case of50 mm pwv, which is expected at Dome Fuji in winter,because such a low pwv has been recorded previouslyat the South Pole in winter (Chamberlin et al., 1997).Fig. 11 shows the resulting transparency spectrum, inwhich there are several windows (where a ‘‘window’’is defined as a frequency range with a transparency ofbetter than 0.3, at 1.0e2.0 THz). On earth, thesewindows are only available upon the Antarctic Plateau

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

Tran

spar

ency

Frequency [THz]

summer (pwv=0.6 mm)

Fig. 10. Simulated spectrum of the atmospheric-transparency at

Dome Fuji (altitude, 3810 m) for average conditions (precipitable

water vapor of 0.6 mm) in summer.

in winter. It should be noted that some importantastronomical spectral lines (Table 1) occur in thesewindows.

5. Conclusion

We measured the 220 GHz atmospheric-transparencyat Dome Fuji in Antarctica, using a tipping radiometer.The average optical depth was t¼ 0.045� 0.007 for27 days from 18 December 2006. The optical depth wasless than 0.06 for 98% of the observing period.The results strongly suggest that Dome Fuji is poten-tially of significant advantage for submillimeterastronomy, compared with other sites currently avail-able. The spectrum of the atmospheric-transparency atDome Fuji was simulated up to 2 THz based onobservational data. We found several ‘‘windows’’ forastronomical observations. Some ‘‘windows’’ in the1.0e2.0 THz range are available only on the AntarcticPlateau.

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to anonymous referees fortheir valuable comments. We are grateful to R. Kawabeof the Nobeyama Radio Observatory and K. Kohno andY. Tamura of the Institute of Astronomy, University ofTokyo, for their kind support in assembling the220 GHz radiometer. We also thank the JapaneseAntarctic Expedition party and the National Institute ofPolar Research for transportation and operation of theradiometer. We acknowledge S. Radford for data ofoptical depths at 225 GHz obtained by the NRAOradiometer. This project was financially supported inpart by the National Astronomical Observatory and theNational Institute of Information and CommunicationsTechnology.

Page 8: Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy… · 2017-01-25 · Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency

AtmosphereTatm

τ0

Radiometer

Trx

ReferenceTref

ScanningMirror

Z

Receiver

Signal

Fig. 12. Schematic view of our measurements of the atmospheric-

transparency, using a tipping radiometer.

220 S. Ishii et al. / Polar Science 3 (2010) 213e221

Appendix A. Measurement of atmospheric-transparency

The atmospheric-transparency is described in theframework of radiative transfer. The brightnesstemperature of the sky, Tsky, is given by

Tsky ¼ Tbexpð�tÞ þ tatmf1� expð�tÞg; ð2Þ

where t is the optical depth of the atmosphere, Tb thebrightness temperature of a celestial object, and Tatm thephysical temperature of the atmosphere. This equationimplies that the atmosphere attenuates radiation fromcelestial objects and adds thermal radiation. The latterdepends on optical depth and temperature. The atmo-spheric-transparency, h, is described by

h¼ expð�tÞ: ð3Þ

When a radiometer points to a blank area of sky, Tb

corresponds to the brightness temperature of thecosmic background radiation, Tb¼ 2.7 K. In this case,the first term of Tsky is negligible (Tb� Tatm w 250e300 K) and

TskyzTatmf1� expð�tÞg: ð4Þ

The optical depth is proportional to the path lengthof the atmosphere along the line of sight. The pathlength is a function of zenith angle, Z, in the plane-parallel atmosphere model, as shown in Fig. 12. Usingthe optical depth at zenith, t0, we can express theoptical depth at Z as follows:

tðZÞ ¼ t0sec Z: ð5Þ

The input of the radiometer at each Z is given, interms of temperature, as

TðZÞzTatmf1� expð�t0sec ZÞgþ Trx; ð6Þ

where Trx is the noise temperature of the radiometer.The output power of the radiometer at Z is

PðZÞ ¼ kBBG½Tatmf1� expð�t0sec ZÞgþ Trx�; ð7Þ

where kB is Boltzmann’s constant, B the frequencybandwidth, and G the radiometer’s gain. When theradiometer is terminated by a reference source (load) atthe ambient temperature, Tamb, the output power is

Pref ¼ kBBGðTamb þ TrxÞ: ð8Þ

If we assume Tatm z Tamb, the zenith optical depthis derived as the proportionality constant of sec Z as

Pref �PðZÞ ¼ kBBGTambexpð�t0sec ZÞ; ð9Þ

ln�

Pref �PðZÞ�¼ ln kBBGTamb � t0sec Z: ð10Þ

Thus, we can obtain the optical depth of the atmo-sphere by least-squares fitting of Equation (10), asshown in Fig. 5.

The assumption of Tatm z Tamb does not signifi-cantly affect the derivation of the optical depth. Theerror in the derived transparency caused by thisassumption is less than 5%, even forTatm� Tamb¼�30 K.

References

Chamberlin, R., Bally, J., 1994. 225-GHz atmospheric opacity of the

South Pole sky derived from continual radiometric measurements

of the skybrightness temperature. Appl. Opt. 33 (6), 1095e1099.

Chamberlin, R., Lane, A., Stark, A., 1997. The 492 GHz atmospheric

opacity at the geographic South Pole. Astrophys. J. 476 (1),

428e433.

Hirasawa, N., Hayashi, M., Kaneto, S., Yamanouchi, T., 1999. Data

of Project on Atmospheric Circulation and Material Cycle in the

Antarctic, Part 1. Aerological Sounding Data at Dome Fuji

Station in 1997. National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo.

Hirota, T., Yamamoto, S., Sekimoto, Y., Kohno, K., Nakai, N.,

Kawabe, R., 1998. Measurements of the 492 GHz atmospheric

opacity at Pampa la Bola and Rio Frio in Northern Chile. Publ.

Astron. Soc. Japan 50, 155e162.

Hogg, D., 1992. A Summary of the Data Obtained During the MMA

Site Survey. Millimeter Array Memo, 79.

Page 9: Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy… · 2017-01-25 · Site testing at Dome Fuji for submillimeter and terahertz astronomy: 220 GHz atmospheric-transparency

221S. Ishii et al. / Polar Science 3 (2010) 213e221

Kohno, K., Kawabe, R., Ishiguro, M., Kato, T., Otarola, A., Booth,

R., Bronfman, L., 1995. Preliminary Result of Site Testing in

Northern Chile with a Portable 220 GHz Radiometer. NRO

Technical Report, 42.

Lane, A.P., 1998. Submillimeter transmission at South Pole. In:

Novak, G., Landsberg, R.H. (Eds.), Astrophysics From

Antarctica. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference

Series, vol. 141, pp. 289e295.

Lawrence, J.S., 2004. Infrared and submillimeter atmospheric char-

acteristics of high Antarctic Plateau sites. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.

116, 482e492.

Masson, C.R., 1994. Atmospheric effects and calibrations. In:

Ishiguro, M., Welch, J. (Eds.), IAU Colloq. 140: Astronomy with

Millimeter and Submillimeter Wave Interferometry. Astronom-

ical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol. 59, p. 87.

Matsuo, H., Sakamoto, A., Matsushita, S., 1998. FTS measurements

of submillimeter-wave atmospheric opacity at Pampa la Bola.

Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 50, 359e566.

Matsushita, S., Matsuo, H., Pardo, J.R., Radford, S.J.E., 1999. FTS

measurements of submillimeter-wave atmospheric opacity at

Pampa la Bola II: supra-terahertz windows and model fitting.

Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 51, 603e610.

Otarola, A., Holdaway, M., Nyman, L.-E., Radford, S., Butler, B.J.,

2005. Atmospheric Transparency at Chajnantor: 1973e2003.

ALMA Memo. 512.

Paine, S., 2004. The am Atmospheric Model. Submillimeter Array

Project, Tech. Memo., 152, 152e03.

Pardo, J., Cernicharo, J., Serabyn, E., 2001. Atmospheric trans-

mission at microwaves ATM: an improved model formillimeter/

submillimeter applications. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 49,

1683e1694.

Radford, S., 2002. Site characterization for mm/submm astronomy.

In: Vernin, J., Benkhaldoun, Z., Munoz-Tunon, C. (Eds.),

Astronomical Site Evaluation in the Visible and Radio Range.

Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol. 266,

p. 148.

Radford, S., Butler, B., Sakamoto, S., Kohno, K., 2001. Atmo-

spheric Transparency at Chajnantor and Pampa la Bola. ALMA

Memo. 384.

Sato, N., 1999. Activities of the wintering party of the 34th Japanese

Antarctic research expedition in 1993e1994. Antarct. Rec. 43

(3), 424e458.

Watanabe, O., Kamiyama, K., Motoyama, H., Fujii, F., Shoji, H.,

Satow, K., 1999. The paleoclimate record in the ice core at

Dome Fuji Station, East Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 29,

176e178.

Yamanouchi, T., Hirasawa, N., Hayashi, M., Takahashi, S.,

Kaneto, S., 2003. Meteorological characteristics of Antarctic

Inland Station, Dome Fuji. Mem. Natl. Inst. Polar Res. Spec.

Issue 57, 94e104.