six months progress review (phd work)

15
SUPPORTING TELECONSULTATION THROUGH TANGIBLE INTERFACES Deepti Aggarwal Interaction Design Lab University of Melbourne Australia

Upload: deepti-aggarwal

Post on 19-Jun-2015

427 views

Category:

Healthcare


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Teleconsultation refers to the electronic communication that happens between a clinician and patient for the purpose of diagnostic or therapeutic advice. Teleconsultations are particularly useful to provide healthcare services in situations where face-to-face consultation may not be easy. So far, the teleconsultations sessions are primarily supported by audio and video based communication. Although audio and video based communications are advantageous for teleconsultation, they may not fully support all the diagnostic tasks that are carried out in a face-to-face consultation session. For example, diagnosis of physical injuries may require physical handling through touch, which is not possible over video based communication. To address this, I put forward a novel approach of using tangible interfaces and artifacts to support physical diagnostic tasks in a teleconsultation sessions. The aim of this thesis is to contribute to the understanding on how to design such tangible interfaces. The research will be carried out in three phases. In the first phase, I will investigate the experience of users with technology involved in a teleconsultation session through observation studies to gather a deep understanding on existing teleconsultation processes. These insights will inform the design for tangible interfaces to support teleconsultation session. The prototyping will be carried out in second phase. Finally, in the third phase I will field deploy the prototype to gather and understand its implication in teleconsultation sessions. This investigation will guide me towards a first conceptual understanding of the design of tangible interfaces for teleconsultation sessions. Ultimately, my aim is to invoke thinking towards natural (tangible) interfaces in supporting teleconsultations to get closer to the experience of face-to-face consultation.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Six months progress review (PhD work)

SUPPORTING TELECONSULTATION THROUGH TANGIBLE INTERFACES

Deepti AggarwalInteraction Design Lab

University of Melbourne

Australia

Page 2: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Health in Rural areas12.6 Million fewer health services in rural areas

(National Rural Heath Alliance, 2011)

Page 3: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Ageing population15.3% of Australian population is over 64 years old.

(Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2011)

Page 4: Six months progress review (PhD work)

TeleconsultationUse of electronic information and communication technologies to provide and support health care when distance separates the participants.

(Field 1996; van Dyk 2014; Yellowlees 2005)

Page 5: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Mediums of TeleconsultationThree mediums: text, audio and visual

Page 6: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Understanding users’ perspectivecommunicating and dealing with technical issues.

Page 7: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Supporting physical interactionsDifficulty in physical diagnosis over a distance

(Field 1996; Pappas & Seale 2009, 2010; van Dyk 2014 )

Page 8: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Tangible InterfacesTo capture, shape and convey physical interactions

(Ishii 2008; Hornecker 2010)

Page 9: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Observation• Gather an

understanding of teleconsultation through participant observation.

Prototyping• Explore the design

space to develop research prototype(s)

Field study• Validate the

developed prototype through qualitative studies

Workshop• Propose a

framework or theory to help further explorations through tangible interfaces

Thesis statementHow to design tangible interactions to support and enrich teleconsultation?

Study 3

Study 2

Study 1

Page 10: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Study 1: Understanding the user experiences of teleconsultation session

Passive observations and semi structured interviews

Page 11: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Work so far…

• Formulating PhD problemMarch - April

• Literature Survey• Collaboration with IEMML and Patricia May-June

• PhD coursework• DC presentation• First observation of teleconsultation

July

• PhD coursework• Observations of MTW training sessionsAugust

• PhD coursework• Observations of MTW training sessions• Submitted Ethics application for Study 1

September

Page 12: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Future Plans• PhD coursework• Observations of MTW training sessions• Submission to DC @CHI 2015

October• Start Study 1• Writing report/paper of MTW intervention• Writing draft for SRC @CHI 2015

Nov.-Dec.• Study 1• Submit to SRC @CHI 2015• Analysis of collected data

January

• Prepare confirmation report• Start writing for CSCW 2016February

• Confirmation• Writing for CSCW 2016March

Page 13: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Timeline

Study 1

(CSCW 2016)

Study 2

(CHI 2016)

Study 3

(CSCW 2017)

Thesis

2014 2015 2016 2017

Page 14: Six months progress review (PhD work)

Deepti [email protected]

Teleconsultation: next best thing

Page 15: Six months progress review (PhD work)

ReferencesAustralian Bureau of Statistics, 2010, Regional Population Growth, Australia, 2008-09

Demiris, G., Charness, N., Krupinski, E., Ben-Arieh, D., Washington, K., Wu, J., and Farberow, B. (2010). The Role of Human Factors in Telehealth. Telemedicine and e-Health, 16(4): 446-453.

Gagnon, Marie-Pierre, Duplantie, J., Fortin, J., and Landry, R. 2006. Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: what are the conditions for success? In Implementation Science.

Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant Observation as a Data Collection Method. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 6:2, art. 43.

Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (6 ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

van Dyk, L. 2014. A review of Telehealth Service Implementation Frameworks. In Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 1279-1298.

Yellowlees, P. 2005. Successfully developing a telemedicine system. In J. Telemed. Telecare, 11, 331-336.