We partnered with LGBT organizations led by people of color….
<Other Studies>
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Other studies on LGBT people have focused on single racial/ethnic groups, one gender, or gender ID, or on those in couples, or on smaller populations, and were generally done with “easier to capture” or easier to study subpopulations.
<One Group>
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Other studies on LGBT people have focused on single racial/ethnic groups, one gender, or gender ID, or on those in couples, or on smaller populations, and were generally done with “easier to capture” or easier to study subpopulations.
<One Gender>
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Other studies on LGBT people have focused on single racial/ethnic groups, one gender, or gender ID, or on those in couples, or on smaller populations, and were generally done with “easier to capture” or easier to study subpopulations.
<Couples>
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Other studies on LGBT people have focused on single racial/ethnic groups, one gender, or gender ID, or on those in couples, or on smaller populations, and were generally done with “easier to capture” or easier to study subpopulations.
<Ethnographic>
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Other studies on LGBT people have focused on single racial/ethnic groups, one gender, or gender ID, or on those in couples, or on smaller populations, and were generally done with “easier to capture” or easier to study subpopulations.
<Easier to Measure>
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Other studies on LGBT people have focused on single racial/ethnic groups, one gender, or gender ID, or on those in couples, or on smaller populations, and were generally done with “easier to capture” or easier to study subpopulations.
< SJS Study >
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In contrast, the SJS study has a total sample size of 5,500 (down to 4,963). It covers a range of 5 groups - diverse in terms of racial/ethnic group, age, gender, relationship status, sexual orientation & gender ID, and 5 broad topic areas. We used a purposive sample, ideal for a study of this kind where random sampling would systematically exclude people of color and disproportionately include white people.
< Total Sample Size = 5,500 >
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In contrast, the SJS study has a total sample size of 5,500 (down to 4,963). It covers a range of 5 groups - diverse in terms of racial/ethnic group, age, gender, relationship status, sexual orientation & gender ID, and 5 broad topic areas. We used a purposive sample, ideal for a study of this kind where random sampling would systematically exclude people of color and disproportionately include white people.
< N = 4,963 >
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In contrast, the SJS study has a total sample size of 5,500 (down to 4,963). It covers a range of 5 groups - diverse in terms of racial/ethnic group, age, gender, relationship status, sexual orientation & gender ID, and 5 broad topic areas. We used a purposive sample, ideal for a study of this kind where random sampling would systematically exclude people of color and disproportionately include white people.
< 5 Groups >
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In contrast, the SJS study has a total sample size of 5,500 (down to 4,963). It covers a range of 5 groups - diverse in terms of racial/ethnic group, age, gender, relationship status, sexual orientation & gender ID, and 5 broad topic areas. We used a purposive sample, ideal for a study of this kind where random sampling would systematically exclude people of color and disproportionately include white people.
< 5 Topic Areas >
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In contrast, the SJS study has a total sample size of 5,500 (down to 4,963). It covers a range of 5 groups - diverse in terms of racial/ethnic group, age, gender, relationship status, sexual orientation & gender ID, and 5 broad topic areas. We used a purposive sample, ideal for a study of this kind where random sampling would systematically exclude people of color and disproportionately include white people.
< Purposive Sample >
Presenter
Presentation Notes
In contrast, the SJS study has a total sample size of 5,500 (down to 4,963). It covers a range of 5 groups - diverse in terms of racial/ethnic group, age, gender, relationship status, sexual orientation & gender ID, and 5 broad topic areas. We used a purposive sample, ideal for a study of this kind where random sampling would systematically exclude people of color and disproportionately include white people.
Research Methods
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Survey (105 questions)Piloted Survey Multiple Times Translated & Back Translated This is how we did it - online, venue based events, partners. Goal was to get people who would not necessarily go to gay pride, but may be a gay rodeo or senior event or religious event.
Piloted Multiple Times
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Piloted multiple times - standard for this methodology - and multiple translations + back translations.
Venue-based Sampling
•Phoenix Pride •Long Beach Pride •DC Black Pride •Portland Latino Pride •Orlando Black Pride/Gay Days •Austin Pride •New York Queens Pride •Boston SPYCE & Boston Pride •Central Alabama Pride (Birmingham) •Milwaukee Wisconsin Pride •Honolulu Pride •Denver Pride •New York Pride
Presenter
Presentation Notes
We gathered data through a variety of purposive sampling methods: venue based events� Goal was to get people who would not necessarily go to gay pride, but may be a gay rodeo or senior event or religious event.
Respondent-Driven
•Phoenix Pride •Long Beach Pride •DC Black Pride •Portland Latino Pride •Orlando Black Pride/Gay Days •Austin Pride •New York Queens Pride •Boston SPYCE & Boston Pride •Central Alabama Pride (Birmingham) •Milwaukee Wisconsin Pride •Honolulu Pride •Denver Pride •New York Pride
Snowball Sampling
•Columbia South Carolina Black Pride •New York Harlem Pride •Miami Beach Bruthaz Bash •Charlotte North Carolina Black Pride •Michigan's Womyn's Festival •Market Days •GMHC House of Latex Ball •Pueblo, CO Gay Pride •Twin Cities Black Pride & South Central MN Pride •World Gay Rodeo Finals, Laughlin, NV
•Columbia South Carolina Black Pride •New York Harlem Pride •Miami Beach Bruthaz Bash •Charlotte North Carolina Black Pride •Michigan's Womyn's Festival •Market Days •GMHC House of Latex Ball •Pueblo, CO Gay Pride •Twin Cities Black Pride & South Central MN Pride •World Gay Rodeo Finals, Laughlin, NV
Quota Sampling
Internet
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Internet sample, with partner orgs. Online = 18% Paper = 82%. � Great for reaching “hard to reach” LGBT populations, such as those in rural areas.
Mobile Technology Supplement
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Supplement – GMHC, speaks to success of partnering with organizations. Large sample size would not have been possible without our partners.
all 50 states
Survey Reach
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The survey reach: All 50 states Image from here: http://geology.com/state-map/maps/usa-map.jpg
Survey Reach
and Puerto Rico
Presenter
Presentation Notes
The survey reach: All 50 states + Puerto RIco Image from here: http://www.globalworkstravel.com/graphics/Puerto_Rico_cgt_map.jpg
< 175+ people >
Presenter
Presentation Notes
More than 175+ people were involved in administering this survey, huge effort by lots of people.
<Preliminary Data>
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Preliminary Data
<Black Sample>
Blacks by Age(SJS: N=2,086)
20%
59%
17%
18-2425-4950+ above
Blacks by Gender(SJS: N=2,086)
52%42%
7%
MaleFemaleGender Variant
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Age3 cisgender
<Latinas/os Sample>
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Latinas/os by Age(SJS: N=1,102)
32%
59%
7%
18-2425-4950+ above
Latinas/os by Gender(SJS: N=1,102)
46%
48%
6%
MaleFemaleGender Variant
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Age3 cisgender
<Asian / Pacific Islanders Sample>
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Asian Pride http://www.flickr.com/photos/38443582@N00/2650198952/Asian SuperGirl http://www.flickr.com/photos/luizmachadophotos/2099846614/ Asian Sailor http://www.flickr.com/photos/philippeleroyer/2623249833/
Have a Mobile Phone with Internet?(SJS Suppl n=479)
89%
25%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Youth - SJS (18-24) Older - SJS (50+)
Who Pays for Mobile Phone?(Among Youth)
61%
10%
18% 15%14%
69%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
I Pay All I Only Pay Part I Pay None
SJSU.S.*
* Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2010
I Use My Phone Everyday To
58%69%
30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Access the Internet Send or Receive TextMessages
Meet Someone New toDate
Use Your Phone to Avoid Police Contact?(SJS Suppl N=479)
56%5%
8%
6%
14%
NeverLess Than Once a WeekAt Least Once a WeekSeveral Times a WeekEvery Day
Use Your Phone to Record Police Misconduct?(SJS Suppl N=479)
56%
10%
8%
6%
14%
NeverLess Than Once a WeekAt Least Once a WeekSeveral Times a WeekEvery Day
<Black Stories from SJS Data>
LGBT Organizations Addressing Racial Justice (SJS: N=2,086)
38%
2%
60%
Not doing enough
Doing just the rightamountDoing too much
Which label best describes your sexual identity? (SJS: N=2,086)
36%
23%
11%
2%
4%
3%
9%
8%0.5% 4%
GayLesbianBisexualTwo SpiritQueerIn the LifeSame Gender LovingStraight/HeterosexualMacha/oOther
Presenter
Presentation Notes
For 70% of the SJS sample, the terms gay, lesbian, bisexual are fine when describing sexual identity. It’s worth noting that 9% of the sample prefers “same gender loving” over the other three categories (see table above).
11a - pray daily Af Ams all 76% Af Ams SJS - 69.4% 11b - I look to my faith as providing meaning and purpose in my life. Af Ams - All 79% say yes (very important in lives - PEW.) Af Am - SJS 78% say yes (11b) Latinos - Pie chart. We’d come if you didn’t be mean to us. Religion / faith is important to us but not attending b/c of homophobia.
Blacks Who Say Religion is Important
79% 78%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Religion is Very Important Blacks U.S.*
Religion Gives Meaning/Purpose Blacks SJS
* Pew Religion & Public Life, 2007
Presenter
Presentation Notes
According to pew (2007), nearly eight-in-ten African-Americans (79%) say religion is very important in their lives. SJS 78% say it gives meaning and/or purpose
Blacks Who Pray Daily
76%69%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pray Daily - Blacks U.S.* Pray Daily - Blacks SJS
* Pew Religion & Public Life, 2007
Presenter
Presentation Notes
According to the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life “more than three-in-four (76%) say they pray on at least a daily basis”; 69.4% from the SJS (see table below).
* Pew Religion & Public Life, 2006
Blacks Who Attend Religious Services
51%
29%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Attend at Least Weekly - Blacks U.S.* Attend Every Week or Nearly EveryWeek - Blacks SJS
Presenter
Presentation Notes
According to pew (2006), 51% of Blacks attend church at least weekly. SJS is 29% is every week or nearly every week.
<Health & Health Care>
Blacks Who Smoke
21%26%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Blacks-U.S.* Blacks-SJS
* Centers for Disease Control, 2009.
Blacks Without Health Insurance
20% 20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Blacks-U.S.* Blacks-SJS
* U.S. Census, 2009.
<Latina/o Stories from SJS Data>
LGBT Organizations & Racial Justice(SJS: N=1,102)
46%
47%
6%
Not doing enough
Doing just the rightamountDoing too much
Latinas/os Sexual Identity
38%
25%
12%
2%
7%
1%3%
9%0.8% 3%
GayLesbianBisexualTwo SpiritQueerIn the LifeSame Gender LovingStraight/HeterosexualMacha/oOther
Who are you "out" to?(SJS: N=1,102)
80%70% 63% 60%
48% 44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Frien
ds
People
Onlin
e
Fam
ily
Co-W
orke
rs
Neighborh
ood
Religio
us Com
munity
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Percent of Latina/o SJS sample who are “out” to most or all of the following communities: friends: 80 people online: 70 family: 63 co-workers: 60 people in your neighborhood: 48 religious community: 44
<Religion & Spirituality>
Presenter
Presentation Notes
11a - pray daily Af Ams all 76% Af Ams SJS - 69.4% 11b - I look to my faith as providing meaning and purpose in my life. Af Ams - All 79% say yes (very important in lives - PEW.) Af Am - SJS 78% say yes (11b) Latinos - Pie chart. We’d come if you didn’t be mean to us. Religion / faith is important to us but not attending b/c of homophobia.
Latinas/os Who Say Religion is Important
68%60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Religion is Very Important-Latinas/os U.S.*
Religion Gives Meaning/Purpose-Latinas/os SJS
* Pew Religion & Public Life, 2007
Presenter
Presentation Notes
According to Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life (2007), a majority of Latinas/os (68%) say religion is very important in their lives. In the SJS sample, 60% say it gives meaning and/or purpose.
Attend at Least Weekly - Latinas/os U.S.* Attend Every week or Nearly Every Week -Latinas/os SJS
* Pew Religion & Public Life, 2007
<Health & Health Care>
Latinas/os Who Smoke
16%
37%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Latina/os-U.S.* Latina/os-SJS
* Centers for Disease Control, 2009.
Latinas/os Without Health Insurance
32% 27%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Latina/os-U.S.* Latina/os-SJS
* U.S. Census, 2009.
<Conclusion>
<Six-Part Dissemination Strategy>
<1. Videos - one per group >
<2. Webinar Series>
<3. Strategic Gatherings>
<4. Weekly Statistics>
<5. Five Reports with Partners>
<6. Curriculum Development>
Thank you!
Sexual Identity v. Racial Identity(SJS: N=4,963)
42%
37%
21%
Sexual Identity is MoreImportant
Sexual and Racial Identityare Equal
Racial Identity is MoreImportant
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Traditionally, this has been a difficult concept to measure. Typically, respondents either refuse to answer, skip the question, or pick “equal.” This is for the total sample, these numbers look different for Blacks / Latinas/os (which I’ll discuss in a few minutes).
Sexual Identity vs. Racial Identity
27%
44%
29%
Sexual Identity is MoreImportantSexual and RacialIdentity are Equal
Racial Identity is MoreImportant
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Traditionally, this has been a difficult concept to measure. Typically, respondents either refuse to answer, skip the question, or pick “equal.” For our sample, less than half chose equal. “more important” does NOT mean “unimportant”
