skills & projects report - acuity · • tips on running a successfully in-house survey ... •...

44
Resident Satisfaction Workshop Denise Raine Director, Acuity SHAPE members 20 th April 2015

Upload: lequynh

Post on 10-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Resident Satisfaction Workshop

Denise Raine

Director, Acuity

SHAPE members20th April 2015

Outline for session

• STAR – update STAR and emerging new questions

• Designing the optimum survey

• Getting the basics right

• Compatibility for SHAPE members

• Tips on running a successfully in-house survey

• When to bring in help

STAR Update

3

• STAR review

• Benchmarking customer experience - findings report

(April 2015)

• A guide to running StarT surveys (April 2015)

• STAR update report (July 2015)

• Annual benchmarking report (April 2015)

Findings – Customer satisfaction surveys

4

• 99% of landlords carry out transactional surveys

• 92% one-off customer surveys

• Telephone (85%) and postal surveys (83%) most popular methods

• Also online (56%), face-to-face (51%), mystery shoppers (48%) and

focus groups (47%)

• Many landlords are reviewing their approach at any one time

• Falling response rates for postal surveys and a low take up of

online surveys are posing challenges for many organisations

Findings – STAR surveys

5

• STAR still relevant (91%)

• Most one-off surveys (66%), but 33% are using tracking surveys

• Postal surveys most common (68% compared to 25% telephone)

• A third of those carrying out postal surveys are considering changing

survey methods

• 66% in favour keeping the value for money question

• 53% keep / 47% remove ‘listens and acts’ question

• Many organisations asking new questions

• Descriptive answer scale still most popular (78%)

• Middle ground has less support (53%)

Findings – Benchmarking

6

• Consistency is more important (59%) than flexibility (17%)

• 70% happy to benchmark against different survey methods, providing they are

made aware of the differences

• 53% would find contextual filters useful, 38% are unsure

Enhanced benchmarking

• Organisations want to see customer satisfaction measures added to the current

benchmarking modules: repairs (79%), lettings (69%), contact centre (61%), asset

management (61%), ASB (59%), complaints (55%), new build (53%)

• Half would like to see expansion of STAR benchmarking

• Interest in HouseMark linking up with UKCSI (79%), NPS (66%), call centre metrics

(55%) and Home Builders Federation (31%)

Collaboration and sharing good practice

7

• Strong demand for guidance (60% to 83%) and learning events (48% to 79%)

• Smaller numbers of organisations have examples that they are willing to share

(17%), case studies (13%), insight (20%) and alternative methods (3%)

• Members want to know more about resources invested in customer

measurement at other organisations (72%)

• Demand for HouseMark seminars on measuring customer satisfaction and the

customer experience

Q. Would guidance on any of the following be useful to your

organisation?

Turning customer insight into action 83%

Different survey methods (including advantages

and disadvantages)79%

Advice on sample sizes, sampling and sampling

errors76%

More information about maximising latest

survey techniques69%

Advice on checking for representativeness and

weighting69%

Carrying out a strategic overview and avoiding

survey overload60%

Carrying out user testing (controlled) 34%

Base 127

Q. HouseMark already provides opportunities for members to learn from one

another. Thinking specifically about measuring the customer experience, would you

like to see any of the following?

How others use customer insight, customer segmentation 79%

Greater share of good practice (including successes and failures) 75%

How other members present their data to different audiences 72%

Ability to share methods and learn from others 70%

Case studies showing how other acted on results /made improvements 69%

How to feedback to residents 67%

How to analyse and interpret data 61%

Presenting the results internally 60%

Greater networking opportunities 56%

Online forums, networking, webinars 48%

Listing current research being carried out at each organisation 48%

Listing current research approaches being used at each organisation 48%

Base 132

STAR - emerging themes

8

• Move to more regular and shorter surveys

• Customer effort

• Well-being questions

• NPS

ONS Well-being questions

9

• Overall, how satisfied are you with

your life nowadays?

• Overall, to what extent do you feel

the things you do in your life are

worthwhile?

• Overall, how happy did you feel

yesterday?

• Overall, how anxious did you feel

yesterday?

• All are answered using a 0 to 10

scale where 0 is ‘not at all’ and 10 is

‘completely’.

Detractors Passives Promoters

3%1% 2% 3% 3%

11%7%

10%

17%

10%

34%

0 (not at all

likely)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (extremely

likely)

15

11

28

All tenants

General needs

tenants

Sheltered housing

tenants

29% 27% 44%

Detractors Passives Promoters

How likely is it that you would recommend your landlord to a friend or family? (NPS)

How likely is it that you would recommend your landlord to a friend or family? (NPS)

Net promoter scoreGeneral

needs

Housing for

older people

Upper quartile 33 50

Median 26 40

Lower Quartile 20 26

Highest 44 73

Lowest -22 9

No. of Orgs 28 26

(2013/14 ©HouseMark April 2015)

-19

-16

-6

-6

6

11

15

17

23

25

26

26

26

28

28

33

34

34

49

Supported housing LSVT LSVT LSVT

LSVT LSVT HA LSVT

Welsh LSVT District Council District Council LSVT

LSVT LSVT Welsh LSVT ALMO

London Borough London Borough London Borough

StarT

12

Review findings

• Develop set of transactional questions (62%)

• Guidance and advice on survey methods and sample sizes for

transactional surveys (87%)

• Benchmarking transactional surveys (54% Yes, 30% don’t know,

17% no)

• Benchmarking four transactional surveys (lettings, responsive

repairs, complaints, ASB)

• Produced a set of questions for each survey

• Data entry to start in April 2016 for HouseMark members

• SPBM – already benchmarking some questions / Acuity review

Housing researchTypes of housing research

• One-off surveys – general satisfaction

• Transactional surveys on specific services / Customer experience surveys

• In-depth consultation

Tenant engagement strategy

Scrutiny panels, Tenant auditors, Estate

Walkabouts, Mystery Shopping, Journey

Mapping, Meetings, Customer Feedback,

Conferences & seminars, Focus groups, Open

meetings, Specialist forums, Surveys &

Questionnaires, Information, Handbooks &

Leaflets, Information notices, Newsletters,

Residents Associations, Tenant Sounding

Board, Tenant Review Panels, Contract

selection, monitoring and steering groups

Community based

surveys

Community development, Neighbourhood surveys,

Resident involvement surveys, Safer communities

surveys

Complaints ASB Complaints, General Complaints

Asset Management Aids and Adaptations, Asset management / Planned

works/ Major works, Decent homes, Gas & Electric

surveys, Gas service & repairs, Responsive repairs,

General repairs

Rent & service charges Rent arrears/Income recovery/Income maximisation,

Service charges

Services Care services care & support, Communal garden &

grounds maintenance, Contact centre, Emergency call

system, Estate services, Families unit, Handyman

services, Housing Management visit, Out of hours

service, Reception Service, Sheltered housing,

Supported housing, Tenancy support

Development New build Development, Design surveys

General satisfaction STAR surveys

Homeowners Shared owners, Leaseholders

Lettings and voids Exit & Voids, New tenancy New lettings

13

• Aim of survey

• Survey design

• Promotion & Incentives

• Response rates

• Inclusivity

• Customer recovery

• Data projection &

confidentiality

• Data entry & analysis

• Statistically reliable and

robust data

• Reporting & using the

results

• Survey costs

• Internal/external

Getting the basics right

14

To be effective you need to:

• Measure and understand levels of customer satisfaction and

customer needs

• Use data to drive up performance in service and cost

effectiveness

• In order to deliver has to be more than just insight–

incorporate action into organisational change

• Organisational fit

Clear objectives & organisational fit

15

Survey design

16

• Sample frame

• Method – postal, telephone, online, face-to-face

• Questionnaire / Question set

• Timing & priority

• Frequency

Postal surveys

Postal self-completion questionnairesAdvantages

• Relatively easy to set up

• Can be very cost effective

• Can survey large numbers

• Respondents may be more willing to express views as there is no interviewer

• Convenient for respondents as have more time to complete the survey and can chose when to do so

Disadvantages

• Likely to have a survey bias which is exaggerated if low response

• Does not take into account any adult literacy issues

• Can suffer from low return rates

• Slow response - takes more time to get results

• Data has to be input

• Respondents cannot be probed and there is no opportunity to clarify answers

• No control over who fills out the questionnaire

• Respondent can choose not to answer some questions

• May be overlooked if sent out with other information

17

Telephone surveysTelephone interviews

Advantages

• Can provide quick results

• Good for short and very focused

interviews

• Greater control of response if using

quotas

• Flexible design – ability to alter survey

length with probes in key areas

• Ability to explain questions to

respondents

• Real-time capture of data, can be

analysed immediately

• Can achieve 100% item response rate to

each question

Disadvantages

• Availability of telephone numbers

• Cannot ask complex detailed questions

• Interview length lifted by a potential

short attention span as residents lose

interest, especially if calling a mobile

number

• A cold call approach may be unwelcome

and seen as intrusive

• Residents may be called at an

inconvenient time, though calls back can

always be scheduled to suit the

respondent

18

Face-to-face surveysFace-to-face interviews

Advantages

• Good response rates

• Suitable for longer interviews with more

complex/probing questions, including

test any visual prompt materials

• Can capture verbal and non-verbal

responses as attitude, emotions and

behaviour can be observed (more likely

used in qualitative in-depth interviews

rather than transaction surveys)

• Can achieve 100% item response rate to

each question

• Sampling can ensure representative

response

Disadvantages

• The most expensive type of survey to

undertake

• Time consuming

• Difficult to cover remote and rural

locations, (cluster sampling can resolve

this but introduces sample bias)

• May produce a non-representative

sample

• Possible interview bias

• Have to consider safety of interviewer

• A good interviewer requires considerable

training

• Data generated can be harder to analyse

• May require manual data entry

19

Online surveysOnline/Mobile device surveys

Advantages

• Low cost

• Automated process with potential for

high reach

• Real-time capture of data, can be

analysed immediately

• Convenience for respondents

• Design flexibility with question routing

• Respondents may be more willing to

express views as there is no interviewer

• Can be visually appealing and include

videos and graphics (but don’t get

carried away!)

• Data captured in electronic form

Disadvantages

• Can suffer from low response rates from

those who do not regularly communicate

online

• With no interviewer, respondents cannot

be probed

• Respondents may not be representative

• Lack of up to date and correct email

addresses

• Spam filters and firewalls can bounce

survey invitations back

• People can be reluctant to click on an

email link to a survey form, given security

concerns

20

Maximising participation

21

• Promotion

• Incentives

• Response rates

• Inclusivity

Confidentiality and anonymity

Individuals undertaking surveys should be clear in their own minds and be

able to clarify to others, the difference between “confidentiality” and

“anonymity”.

Confidentiality means following good practice to ensure that no personal

information about individual residents, or very small groups of residents, is

released into the public domain, or within your organisation, except

amongst a very small group of data controllers

Anonymity means that information provided to you or your contractors, in

the form of survey responses and views expressed by the respondent,

cannot be tracked back to an individual resident.

22

Data protection and confidentiality• Information collected through customer

surveys is market research

• Market Research Society guidelines and the

Data Protection Act state: that the data

collected should not identify individual

respondents, unless they have given clear and

express permission for this

• Establish clear protocols within your

organisation about who can access individual

survey responses

• Ask for respondent permission to re-contact :

• where service delivered is not good or follow up is needed

• where you may want to populate your customer database

with demographic and household information

• where you may want to contact certain respondents (e.g.

those who are dissatisfied with a particular service) for further

research, such as focus group

Greater Manchester

Police has been

fined £120,000 by

the Information

Commissioner's

Office (ICO) for

failing to take

appropriate

measures against

the loss of personal

data.

An investigation into the force's data

protection practices was launched after a

memory stick containing personal details

about thousands of people linked to police

operations was stolen from an officer's home

in July 2011. Despite the sensitive nature of

the data, the device had no password

protection. (October 2012)

Customer recovery

23

Designing the optimum questionnaire

24

• STAR questions

• SPBM questions

• SHAPE questions

• Other sources – ONS, HACT well-being

• Bespoke questions

• Open ended questions

• Confidentiality & Anonymity

• Questionnaire design / order

Question types & responsesQuestion types & response :

• Closed questions / open questions

• Yes / No

• Numerical / descriptive

• One question at a time

• Balance or unbalanced scales

• Use of neither/middle ground

• No opinions

• Don’t know / Can’t remember

• Unbiased questions

How would you rate the great service

provided by your landlord?

Excellent � Very Good � Good � Poor �

Question order is vital!

Which of the following methods of being kept

informed and getting in touch with [your social

housing provider] are you happy to use? (Cac5)

� Email

� Telephone

� Text / SMS

� In writing

� Visit to the office

� Visit to your home by staff

� Open meetings

� Newsletter

� Other - please state

25

Open ended questions

Probing deeper

• Any why were you satisfied/dissatisfied?

Capturing areas for improvement

• What did you like most about our

customer call centre?

• How do you think we can improve our

service?

• What did you like least?

Don’t forget these questions have to be

coded!

Tenants’ repairs experience

– poor performance

%

Too lengthy a time before started 12%

Poor quality of repair work 8%

Appointments not kept/cancelled 8%

Work took a long time to

complete/needed several visits/not

right first time

8%

Still waiting for the repair/Inspector 7%

Some workmen are better than others 5%

Generally poor service/incompetent 4%

Poor quality materials used/go for

cheapest option

3%

Same problem keeps re-occurring 3%

Outstanding repairs 1%

Need periodic inspections to save

minor work becoming major

1%

Other 1%

26

Is there anything else you

would like to say about

your home and/or the

housing services your

landlord provides?

Planned works

such as

replacement

kitchens and

bathrooms

14%

Day-to-day

repairs and

maintenance

service

10%

Customer contact

9%

Poor condition of

property

8%

Neighbours,

neighbourhood

or local problems

6% Tenant services

5%

Tenancy

management

3%

Estate and

grounds

maintenance

2%

Communications

and information

2%

Positive

comments

25%

Other

16%

27

Managing customer expectations

Have you raised expectations?

• How many times a year would you like a home visit?

• Would you like the office to be open 24 hours a day?

• However surveys can be useful to:

– Identify areas of where customers have high expectations

and understand the drivers

– Whether you have clear communications

28

The lens of the customer

Examples

Telephoning the landlord

• We will answer the telephone in 3 rings

• Does this met your customer’s

expectations?

• What do they want?

Letting a property

29

Avoiding common pit falls

30

• Don’t ask nice to know

• Don’t ask things you already know

• Make sure the questions suit the

method

• Has to look professional, branded

• Colour helps (if you can afford it)

30

Quality assurance

• Data entry

• Data analysis

• Statistically reliable and robust data

- Is the data representative?

- Weighting the data

- Reliability & Margin of error

31

Is the data representative?

• Need to look at representativeness

(even when carried out a census)

– Is there any response bias?

• What to use? (tenure, area,

bedrooms, diversity strands, age)

• If it is not representative need to

consider weighting the data

32

Population # %

General Needs 650 71%

Sheltered 265 29%

All residents 915 100%

Response

General Needs 309 60%

Sheltered 210 40%

All residents 519 100

Weights

General Needs 1.18

Sheltered 0.73

Weighting applied

32

• Sampling error (also known as confidence interval or margin of error)

measures the accuracy of survey results in relation to the total

population

• You can decide yourself how accurate your results need to be.

HouseMark recommends a sampling error of ±5% at the 95% confidence

level for smaller landlords.

• What it means (±5%) If 85% of residents answered “Yes” to a particular

question, there are 95 chances out of 100 that the correct figure for all

residents – including those who did not respond – would be between

80% and 90%.

• Try to achieve at least 100 responses at the sub-level (e.g. area, tenure)

• Sampling error relevant for quantitative, not small-scale qualitative

surveys

Is the data reliable?

33

Sampling error - lookup tables

PopulationNumbers of achieved responses required to meet sampling errors at 95% confidence level

±3.0% ±4.0% ±5.0% ±6.0% ±7.0% ±8.0% ±9.0% ±10.0%

25 24 24 24 23 22 22 21 20

50 48 46 44 42 40 38 35 33

100 92 86 80 73 66 60 54 49

150 132 120 108 96 85 75 66 59

200 169 150 132 115 99 86 75 65

250 203 177 152 129 110 94 81 70

300 234 200 169 141 119 100 85 73

400 291 240 196 160 132 109 92 78

500 341 273 217 174 141 116 96 81

600 384 300 234 185 148 120 99 83

700 423 323 248 193 153 124 102 85

800 457 343 260 200 158 126 103 86

900 488 360 269 206 161 129 105 87

1000 516 375 278 211 164 131 106 88

2000 695 462 332 236 179 140 112 92

5000 880 536 357 253 189 146 116 94

http://www.arap.co.uk/resident-satisfaction/sample-sizes/

34

Reporting and feedback

• How does your performance compare with last year / over time?

• Who are you benchmarking against?

• Who do you feedback to internally?

• Do you discuss and share your the findings?

• Do you draw up action plans?

• Customer feedback - How are you feeding back your results to

your customers? Can you do anything differently? (attend coffee

mornings, participation events, hold focus groups)

• Follow up research - Do you measure and review performance

after service changes?

35

Benchmarking

• SPBM benchmarking incudes:

- core 7 STAR

- NPS

- repairs (transactional)

• Agree other questions to

use as a group

• Reports from SPBM

• Discussion rather than

formal benchmarking

• If in doubt: ask Acuity

36

90

93 93

94

91

92

87

92

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

GN HfOP

Satisfaction with overall services

Me SHAPE SPBM HouseMark

Correlation

Strength • None (0 to ±0.1)

•Weak (±0.1 to ±0.3)

•Medium (±0.3 to ±0.5)

• Strong (±0.5 to ±1)

Overall

service

provided

Quality of

home

Neighbour

hoodVFM (rent)

VFM (service

charge)

Repairs

and

maintena

nce

Listen

s to

views

Overall service provided 1.00

Quality of home 0.62 1.00

Neighbourhood 0.34 0.44 1.00

VFM (rent) 0.63 0.57 0.35 1.00

VFM (service charge) 0.58 0.52 0.37 0.71 1.00

Repairs and maintenance 0.79 0.54 0.26 0.54 0.49 1.00

Listens to views 0.70 0.57 0.35 0.57 0.57 0.65 1.00

37

If you work hard, and

become successful, it does

not necessarily mean you

are successful because you

worked hard, just as if you

are tall with long hair it

doesn’t mean you would be

a midget if you were bald.

(Daniel Handler, American

author)

37

Key Driver Analysis

Repairs and

maintenanceVFM (rent) Neighbourhood

Listens to views

and acts

VFM (service

charge)

Quality of

home

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

(1

00

%)

Measure of influence

38

Key areas of

satisfaction

& customer

loyalty

88%

85%

84%

84%

83%

82%

82%

82%

78%

78%

76%

76%

Services provided

by landlord

Neighbourhood

Value for money

of rent

Quality of home

Dealt with quickly

& efficiently

Appearance of

neighbourhood

Repairs &

maintenance…

Helpfulness of

staff

Grounds

maintenance

Keeping tenants

informed

Value for money

(service charges)

Overall estate

services

90%

90%

90%

89%

88%

88%

88%

86%

86%

83%

83%

81%

79%

73%

Query dealt with quickly and

efficiently

Appearance of

neighbourhood

Quality of home

Keeping tenants informed

Advice & support

Services provided by landlord

Neighbourhood as a place to

live

Repairs & maintenance

service

Repairs – service on last

occasion

Repairs – done right first time

Final outcome of enquiry

Grounds maintenance

Value for money of rent

Listens to views and acts on

them

39

40

Tips for running a successful in-house survey

41

• Desk-top research - check out other organisations

• Involve residents

• Ensure everyone knows when the survey is happening

and can answer questions from residents

• Build in extra time – things always take longer

• Consider a booster survey

• Check you have skills to fully analyse the results

• Make sure you allow enough time to write any report

• Make sure survey is fully costed

� Aims and objectives of survey / fit

with organisation

� Good survey design

� Good use of questions and answer

scales

� Appropriate research methodology

� Plan of action for low response rate

� Survey promotion

� Confidentiality and anonymity, data

protection checks

� Customer recovery, time set aside

� Inclusive

� Checks in place to ensure statistical

reliability

� Ability to analyse results

� High quality outputs

� Feasible project timetable, including

reporting and dissemination

� Provides customer insight and

understanding of the customer

experience

� Will drive satisfaction and service

changes

� Cost and value to organisation

calculated

� Internal/external cost benefit checked

Good practice – check list �

42

When best to commission external research

• You do not have time to do the research

• Analysis is beyond your own statistics skill level

• Fulfilment

• Do not have the software

• In-house capacity – such as report writing

Do you ask them for skills training as part of the project?

Are there some skills that could be developed internally through

training courses and further study?

Remember - You don’t always have to commission all of the project

Design / Fieldwork / Data entry / Data analysis / Reporting

All linked to timing, resources and skill set!

When to bring in assistance

43

Summary

• Any questions?

• Was the workshop useful?

Email

• Copy of slides

• HouseMark reports

Denise Raine - Director, Acuity

T: 01865 594330 M: 07712 891656

E: [email protected]

W: arap.co.uk