skyline college instructional and … college annual program plan page 12 of 13 january 2013 ....

Skyline College Annual Program Plan Page 12 of 13 January 2013

SKYLINE COLLEGE INSTRUCTIONAL AND STUDENT SERVICES

ANNUAL PROGRAM/UNIT PLANNING DOCUMENT

INTRODUCTION

The Skyline College faculty, staff and administration support the evaluation of programs and services through the Annual Program planning process as the College continually strives to demonstrate and improve institutional effectiveness and student outcomes. The Skyline College Community embraces the concept that only through authentic, deep and on-going evaluation and assessment can institutions improve their programs and services to meet the evolving needs of students. Annual Program Planning and Comprehensive Program Review are intended to provide every program and service area with the opportunity to review and assess itself in relation to its mission, its goals and objectives, and its relationship to the mission of the College and the District, as well as fulfillment of needs presented by students and the local community. The Skyline College Annual Program Plan is an integral piece of the planning and budget processes. The Skyline College model is an integrated one, used by instructional programs and student services. The integrated model is one that allows each Program and Service Area to maintain its identity and uniqueness, while creating a standardized approach to annual planning. The purpose of the Annual Program Plan is to collect information to be used by the college planning bodies IPC (Institutional Planning Committee), ILT (Instructional Leadership Team), SSLT (Student Services Leadership Team), CBC (College Budget Committee), Full-Time Faculty Allocation Committee (FTEFAC) and may be used for Program Improvement and Viability (PIV). Through this process, faculty/staff have the opportunity to review the mission and vision of their department/program. Then, using multiple measures and inquiry, faculty will reflect on and evaluate their work for the purposes of improving student learning and program effectiveness. This reflection will identify steps and resources necessary to work towards the program vision including personnel, professional development, facilities, and equipment. Annual program plans are completed by each program/department/unit yearly. The Annual Program Planning document can serve as the basis for completing the six-year Comprehensive Program Review.

PURPOSES To develop, maintain, improve and promote quality instruction and support services in order to

optimize student learning outcomes and access To promote dialogue and collaboration among faculty, administrative and classified staff, and

students To enhance interaction among programs, instruction, and student support services To ensure the effective and efficient utilization of the College's human, financial physical, and

technology resources To ensure a process in accordance with Accreditation Standards consistent with the District and

College vision, mission and goals

Skyline College Annual Program Planning Page 2 of 13 January 2013

SUGGESTED TIMELINES FOR ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING

PLANNING AND REVIEW OF DATA NEEDS: NOVEMBER DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION MEETING Program/Unit teams are identified and organized. Departments or programs are urged to include

part-time faculty and appropriate classified staff in the review process.

Planning team reviews the instrument.

Basic enrollment, retention data, and other pertinent data will be provided by the Office of Planning, Research and Institutional Effectiveness (PRIE). (Change to the active tense to stay consistent with the other statements) The Office of Planning, Research and Institutional Effectiveness (PRIE) provides basic enrollment, retention data, and other pertinent data.

Planning team collects data including course and program student learning outcomes from Tracdat.

Initial findings are discussed with the entire department and Division Dean/Administrator. The entire department and Division Dean/Administrator discuss initial findings.

Additional data requested from PRIE as needed. Teams request additional data as needed from PRIE.

PROGRAM/UNIT ANALYSIS DATA: JANUARY/FEBRUARY DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION MEETINGS Planning team analyzes data, including course and program student learning outcomes, student

success and retention data, and other data as needed.

Planning team reviews all courses for currency and assures course outlines are correctly formatted to the most current course outline of record template, and ensures they are accurately input into CurricUNET.

Planning team completes program/unit data analysis/assessment and summarizes findings. Programs/units start to update annual planning report. PROGRAM/UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF ACTION PLAN AND RESOURCE NEEDS: MARCH DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION MEETING Program/unit faculty/staff develop action plan and resource needs in response to assessment of

program data.

Program/unit faculty/staff finalize the Annual Program Planning self-study and in the first week of April submit one electronic and one paper copy of the planning self-study to the Office of Planning, Research and Institutional Effectiveness for distribution to the Institutional Planning Committee (IPC).

The Institutional Planning Committee reviews all submitted annual program plans and distributes requests for allocations through the approved college processes.

Program/Unit planning resource recommendations are placed into existing college resource recommendations for the subsequent academic year. (This sentence also is written in the passive, but I wasnt clear on who places these recommendations.)


SKYLINE COLLEGE ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SELF STUDY

The forms to complete the self-study can be obtained on the Program Review website at http://www.skylinecollege.edu/programreview/directionsandforms.php. The site provides links to the Annual Program/Unit Planning document. You can complete the self-study form on your computer. You will need Adobe Acrobat Professional or the newest version of Reader in order to complete your form. Computers configured since 2011 should have Adobe Pro for those with an older version of Adobe Acrobat Reader, please submit a work request with IT to be upgraded to Pro or the newest version of Reader. This upgrade can only be placed on SMCCCD issued computers. Save your form as a PDF format. Save and name your file as Program Name_AP_Year (e.g., Mathematics_AP_2013). Self-Study Submit the report including both questions and responses. Tracdat reports Attach your summary of assessment, analysis and action plans for the courses and/or program completed during this academic year. Tool: https://sanmateo.tracdat.com/tracdat/ Needs Summary Form Briefly list your resource needs in the space provided and submit as part of your completed annual planning document.


SKYLINE COLLEGE ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING SELF-STUDY

Note: To complete this form, SAVE it on your computer, then send to your Division Dean/VPI as an

ATTACHMENT on an e-mail message.

Program Title: Date Submitted: Key Findings: 1. Planning Group Participants (include PT& FT faculty, staff, students, stakeholders)

List of names and positions: 2. Contact Person (include e-mail and telephone): 3. Program Information A. Program Personnel Identify the number of personnel (administrators, faculty, classified, volunteers, and student workers) in the program:

FT Faculty: PT/OL Faculty (FTE): FT Classified: PT Classified (FTE): Volunteers: Student Workers:


B. Program Mission and Goals State the goals/focus of the program and how the program contributes to the mission and priorities of the College and District. Address how the program meets the current years strategic priorities. (200 word limit)

4. Program/Service Area: Student Learning Outcomes and Program Data A. Summarize recent course and/or program SLO assessment, identify trends and discuss areas in need of improvement. Please attach summary Tracdat reports with assessment and analysis for SLOs evaluated during the year (prior to submission deadline of April 1st)

Tool: https://sanmateo.tracdat.com/tracdat/


B. Analyze evidence of Program performance. Review and analyze productivity, student characteristics and outcomes. Tool: http://www.skylinecollege.edu/prie/programdata.php C. Explain how other information may impact the Program (examples are business and employment needs, new technology, new transfer requirements etc.)


5. Curricular Offerings

Tools: CurricUNET http://www.curricunet.com/smcccd; https://sanmateo.tracdat.com/tracdat/ A. Program Curriculum and Courses. If your program does not offer curriculum please state N/A.

Respond to the following:

What new courses (excluding individual Selected Topics [665] topics and Experimental [680/880] courses) have you added to your program curriculum in the past academic year? List by Department, Course Number and Course Title.

If you have not done so already, please email the TracDat Coordinator to request that these courses to be added to TracDat.

Have you uploaded SLOs for your new courses in TracDat?

Have you mapped course-level SLOs to PSLOs and ISLOs?

Have you uploaded an assessment method (need not be specific) for each course?


B. Identify Patterns of Curriculum Offerings

6. Response to Previous Annual Program Plan & Review

List any recommendations for the program and your responses to these recommendations based on previous Annual Program Plan and/or CTE Professional Accreditation report.


What is the planning groups 2-year curriculum cycle of course offerings by certificates and degrees?

What is the ideal curriculum cycle?

Discuss any issues.


7. Action Plan

Provide your action plan based on the analysis and reflections provided in the previous sections. Note resource requests should be connected to action plans.


Describe data and assessment results for Program Student Learning Outcomes. Analyze and reflect on assessment results for Program Student Learning Outcomes and other measures of Program performance.

Analyze and reflect on other evidence described in previous sections. Identify the next steps, including any planned changes to curriculum or pedagogy.

Identify questions that will serve as a focus of inquiry for next year.


8. Resource Identification A. Professional Development needs

B. Office of Planning, Research & Institutional Effectiveness requests C. Faculty and Staff hiring, Instructional Equipment and Facilities Requests Complete the following table:

Actions:

List data requests for the Office of Planning, Research & Institutional Effectiveness.

Explain how the requests will serve the Student/Program/Division/College needs.


Annual Program Planning Resource Needs Program _______________ Date__________

What are the needs? How does this request align

with your assessment of student outcomes?

How does this request align with your action

plan?

What is the estimated cost for facilities and

equipment?

Personnel

1.

2.

3.

Equipment

1.

2.

3.

4.

Facilities

1.

2.

3.

4.

Skyline College Annual Program Plan Page 12 of 13 January 2013

APPENDIX A VISION, MISSION, VALUES AND GOALS OF SKYLINE COLLEGE Please check current catalog for most recent goal statements. Vision Statement Skyline College inspires a global and diverse community of learners to achieve intellectual, cultural, social, economic and personal fulfillment. Mission Statement To empower and transform a global community of learners. Values Statement Education is the foundation of our civilized democratic society. Thus: Campus Climate: We value a campus-wide climate that reflects a students first philosophy' with mutual respect between all constituencies and appreciation for diversity. Both instruction and student services are dedicated to providing every student with an avenue to success. Open Access: We are committed to the availability of quality educational programs and services for every member of our community regardless of level of preparation, socio-economic status, cultural, religious or ethnic background, or disability. We are committed to providing students with open access to programs and responsive student services that enable them to advance steadily toward their goals. Student Success: We value students success in achieving their goals, and strengthening their voices as they transform their lives through their educational experience. Academic Excellence: We value excellence in all aspects of our mission as a comprehensive community college offering preparation for transfer to a baccalaureate institution, workforce and economic development through career technical education programs and certificates, Associate of Arts and Associate of Science degrees, basic skills development, and lifelong learning. We are committed to academic rigor and quality with relevant, recent, and evolving curriculum and well-equipped programs that include new and emerging areas of study. We are dedicated to an educational climate that values creativity, innovation and freedom of intellectual exploration, discovery, thought, and exchange of ideas. Community Connection: We value a deep engagement with the community we serve and our role as an academic and cultural center for community including business, industry, labor, non-profits, government and the arts. We are dedicated to maintaining a college culture and institutional climate that is warm and welcoming to all. Shared Governance: We value just, fair, inclusive, and well understood, transparent governance processes based upon open and honest communication. Sustainability: We value an institutional culture that represents a strong commitment to environmental sustainability and justice. We are committed to the tenets of sustainability To meet present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.


APPENDIX B

Definition of Terms WSCH: Weekly Student Contact Hours are based on the first census week of a Fall term. They do not

include second census week data, but they do include all positive attendance data for the term (converted to WSCH) including classes which start after the first census

FTE: The full-time equivalent faculty count is determined by the set of rules provided to each college at

the time the data is requested. Generally, the figures are the decimal fraction of the teaching hours or units ascribed to the faculty member for teaching work done. Non-teaching time is specifically excluded so that it does not affect the value of the data. Work done by non-certified-personnel is not included.

LOAD: Teaching Load is taken as the ratio of WSCH to FTE N GRADES: The total number of grades awarded (A+B+C+D+F+CR+NCR+I+W) RETENTION: The sum of all non-W grades divided by N grades times 100, expressed as % SUCCESS: A+B+C+CR grades divided by N grades times 100, expressed as %

Skyline CollegeAnnual Program Planning Self-StudyVision StatementMission StatementValues StatementThus:

Definition of Terms

Sheet1

SKYLINE COLLEGE INSTRUCTIONAL EQUIPMENT LIST 2014-2015

Kinesiology/Athletics/Dance

DivisionDEPT.PriorityITEM#COST/UNITTOTALTOTAL+ 9 %ShipCOSTOtherReq.StartedRec' ItemNotes

KADADAP1ADAP EquipNA$1,900.00$1,900.00$2,071.00$250.00$2,321.00

KADINDV1Archery EquipNA$1,600.00$1,600.00$1,744.00$1,744.00

KADFITN1Fitness Equipment14$500.00$7,000.00$7,630.00$1,200.00$8,830.00

KADATH1Ice machine1$5,800.00$5,800.00$6,322.00$400.00$6,722.00$800Install

KADATH1Thermo Stimulation1$1,300.00$1,300.00$1,417.00$250.00$1,667.00

KADFITN1Replacement Spinning Bikes6$1,400.00$8,200.00$8,938.00$400.00$9,338.00$500Assembly and Install

KADATH1Therapy Equipment6$300.00$1,800.00$1,962.00$200.00$2,162.00

KADATH1L-Screen1$3,500.00$7,000.00$7,630.00$300.00$7,930.00

KADATH1Badminton Equipment25$100.00$2,500.00$2,725.00$250.00$2,975.00

KADATH1Blacknight Trainer / Randomizer1$5,836.00$5,836.00$6,361.24$250.00$6,611.24

KADATH1Basketball Scorers Table / ChairsNA$13,000.00$13,000.00$14,170.00$1,500.00$15,670.00

KADKAD1Adjunct Office Desktops6$2,200.00$13,200.00$14,388.00$14,388.00

KADKAD1Division Lap-Tops2$1,800.00$3,600.00$3,924.00$3,924.00

KADDANC1Costumes$3,000.00$3,000.00$3,270.00

KAD1Total Priority 1$ 75,736.00$82,552.24$5,000.00$ 87,552.24$4,300.00$ 91,852.24

Descriptions:

ADAP/Archery Equipment: Replacement of current aids. Requested as part of the unit plan

Finess Equipment: Several standing pieces are at the end of their useful life. Requested in unit plan

Thermo Stimulation: Replacement of the current unit which is over 15 years old. Important piece of equipment to get students participating so as to meet SLO's. Requested as part of Unit Plan.

Spinning Bikes: Replacement of the 6 oldest bikes. Second year of a six year replacement cycle. Requested as part of the unit Plan.

Thearapy Equipment: A total of six pieces are requested to be replaced. Current inventory is at the end of its useful life. Requested as part of unit plan.

Ice machine: Current model is 13 years old and at the end of its useful life. Were purchased with IE in early 2000's.

Baseball L Screens: We have two screens that need to be replaced.

Badminton Equipment: Replacing items at end of useful life.Requested in unit plan.

Adjunct Office Desktops: Computers were purchased / installed in September 06. They need to be replaced.

Division Lap Tops: Purchased in September 06. They need to be replaced. Could we get a IPAD or Surface instead? We want to go paperless for Fitness Testing

Costumes: Necessary for productions. Request is included in unit plan.

Course Assessment Report-- Four Column

SKY Dept - Kinesiology

San Mateo CCCD

Department AssessmentCoordinator:

Jan Fosberg and Kevin Corsiglia

Course Outcomes Means of Assessment & Success Criteria /Tasks Results Action & Follow-Up

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY ADAP 358 -Adapted Strength Development- Skills and Concepts - Upon completion of thecourse, and in the absence of a degenerativedisease process, students will be able todemonstrate increased muscular strength andendurance, or in the presence of a degenerativedisease process, demonstrate either maintained orslowed degradation of muscular strength andendurance in areas where given the normalcourse of the disease, decreased muscle strengthand endurance would be expected. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)

Course Outcome Status:Active

Assessment Method:Oral and/or Demonstration individually and insmall groups of proper techniques relative todaily functioning (standing, sitting, lying,walking, striding with arm swing, stopping orspeeding up quickly, climbing or descendingstairs) and safe techniques adapted to disabilityfor using closed chain equipment (leg press,hamstring curl, seated row, lat pulldown,gravitron), adaptations for using Nu-Step,elliptical bikes, treadmill, recumbent bikes andarm/leg cyles, personalized adaptations fordumbbells, elastic bands, Swiss balls and variousmethods to stimulate greaterNEUROMUSCULAR brain connections.Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion:Successful Demonstration wins approval toinclude that technique as part of individualexercise prescription either in class or at home asdaily homework.Performance Criteria: 50% of Students will becapable of achieving a 70% or higher on thisexam

02/04/2015 - Of the 100 students enrolled in Spring 14and Fall 15; greater than 80% received a C grade orhigher on examResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

02/03/2014 - The majority of students who completedthe class were able to demonstrate individually and insmall groups of proper techniques relative to dailyfunctioning (standing, sitting, lying, walking, stridingwith arm swing, stopping or speeding up quickly,climbing or descending stairs) and safe techniquesadapted to disability for using closed chain equipment(leg press, hamstring curl, seated row, lat pulldown,gravitron), adaptations for using Nu-Step, ellipticalbikes, treadmill, recumbent bikes and arm/leg cyles,personalized adaptations for dumbbells, elastic bands,Swiss balls and various methods to stimulate greaterNEUROMUSCULAR brain connections.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:While students are meeting this outcome, thelack of specialized equipment and a qualifiedaide makes serving additional students difficult.Class numbers are in the teens and need to staythere to effectively achieve outcomes.

05/24/2013 - 46 of 47 students (98%) successfullydemonstrated individually and in small groups propertechniques relative to daily functioning (standing,sitting, lying, walking, striding with arm swing,stopping or speeding up quickly, climbing or

03/23/2015 2:23 PM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive. Page 1 of 177


descending stairs) and safe techniques adapted todisability for using closed chain equipment (leg press,hamstring curl, seated row, lat pulldown, gravitron),adaptations for using Nu-Step, elliptical bikes,treadmill, recumbent bikes and arm/leg cyles,personalized adaptations for dumbbells, elastic bands,Swiss balls and various methods to stimulate greaterNEUROMUSCULAR brain connections.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/10/2013 - 45 of 50 students (90%) were able todemonstrate proper techniques relative to dailyfunctioning (standing, sitting, lying, walking, stridingwith arm swing, stopping or speeding up quickly,climbing or descending stairs) and safe techniquesadapted to disability for using closed chain equipment(leg press, hamstring curl, seated row, lat pulldown,gravitron), adaptations for using Nu-Step, ellipticalbikes, treadmill, recumbent bikes and arm/leg cyles,personalized adaptations for dumbbells, elastic bands,Swiss balls and various methods to stimulate greaterNEUROMUSCULAR brain connections.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/20/2011 - 26/31 Students=84% of Students couldexplain/demonstrate proper techniques for physicalmovement and use of class machines and equipmentappropriate to their degenerative disease process.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO 358 Assessment Plan 1 17 11.doc

Assessment Method:Bicep curl repetitions in 30 secondsAssessment Instrument: Repetitions completedin 30 seconds by females using 3# and malesusing 5# weights

02/04/2015 - More than 70% of the students whocompleted the class without physical limitationscompleted 15 or more lifts in 30 secondsResult Type:Criterion met


https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=YoB9DDcZfKzy


Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion:70% of students without physical limitations willcomplete 15 or more lifts in 30 seconds

Reporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

02/03/2014 - Over 70% of students without physicallimitations were able to complete 15 or more bicep curlrepititions. Repetitions completed in 30 seconds byfemales using 3# and males using 5# weightsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014

05/24/2013 - 42 of 42 students, 100%, without physicallimitation were able to complete 15 repetitions in 30seconds with females using 3# and males using 5#weights.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/10/2013 - 49 of 50 students were able to meet thecriteria by completing 15 or more bicep curl repetitionsin 30 seconds Assessment Instrument: Repetitionscompleted in 30 seconds by females using 3# and malesusing 5# weightsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/20/2011 - 27 /27 Students= 100% of students werecapable of lifting 3# or 5# respectively 15 or more liftsin 30 secondsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO 358 Assessment Plan 1 17 11.doc

07/31/2009 - Greater than 50% showed improvement,maintenance or slowed degradation of muscularstrength, endurance, balance, gait and cardiovascularefficency.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:




2009 - 2010Related Documents:Chip ADAP Summer 2009PORTFOLIO 9 17 10 (2).pdf

Assessment Method:Sit and stand for 30 seconds (wheelchair andrecent surgery exempt)Assessment Instrument: Sit, stomp feet andstand the maximum number of times possiblewith physical limitations

Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion:70% of students without physical limitations willbe able to sit and stand 10 or more times in 30seconds

02/04/2015 - Over 70% of the students who completedthe class without physical limitations were able to sitand stand 10 or more times in 30 secondsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

02/03/2014 - All students who completed the class whodid not have a physical limitation which prevented themfrom completing the assessment were able to sit, standand stomp feet as a measurement of agility and balance.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014

05/24/2013 - 30 of 30 students, 100%, were able to sitand stand 10 or more times in 30 seconds(wheelchairand recent surgery exempt) Assessment Instrument: Sit,stomp feet and stand the maximum number of timespossible with physical limitations.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/10/2013 - 28 of 31 students (90%) without physicallimitations were able to sit and stand 10 or more timesin 30 secondsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/20/2011 - 15 /15 Students= 100% of studentswithout limiting physical conditions were able to sitand stand 10 or more times in 30 secondsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:


https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=UNZ5Fd47hlFg

https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=UNZ5Fd47hlFg


SLO 358 Assessment Plan 1 17 11.doc

Assessment Method:In-class chair exercises; Assessment Instrument:Daily participation points in progressiveexercises

Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion:70% of students will complete 70% of in-classchair exercises

02/04/2015 - All students were able to earn progresspoints for performance of chair exercises.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

05/24/2013 - 47 of 47 students who completed the classdemonstrated improved flexibility, muscular staminaand general strength as compared to pre-test /presentation assessment.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/10/2013 - 47 of 47 students (100%) met the criteriaby completing in-class chair exercises; AssessmentInstrument: Daily participation assessment inprogressive exercisesResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/20/2011 - 28 / 31 Students = 90% of studentscompleted 70% of in-class workoutsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO 358 Assessment Plan 1 17 11.doc

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY ADAP 359 -Balance/Functional Movement...- Skills and Concepts - Upon completion of thecourse, and in the absence of a degenerativedisease process, students will be able todemonstrate increased balance and functionalmovement, or in the presence of a degenerativedisease process, demonstrate either maintained orslowed degradation of balance and functional

Assessment Method:Assessment Method:Individual verbal andkinesthetic testing of proper techniques for goodstride and gait function, how to balance on onefoot from high to low with a reach, how tochange stride and direction to avoid falling orcolliding with obstacles.Assessment Method Category:Presentation/Performance

02/04/2015 - Slightly more than 95% of students wereable to successfully explain and demonstrate propertechniques for gait, stride and balance appropriate tostairs, hills, uneven surfaces and unexpected obstaclescommon in everyday lifeResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015





movement in areas where given the normalcourse of the disease, decreased balance andfunctional movement would be expected.(Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)


Success Criterion:70% of Students will be able to successfullyexplain and demonstrate proper techniques forgait, stride and balance appropriate to stairs, hills,uneven surfaces and unexpected obstaclescommon in everyday life.

02/03/2014 - Over 70% of students were able tosuccessfully explain and demonstrate proper techniquesfor gait, stride and balance appropriate to stairs, hills,uneven surfaces and unexpected obstacles common ineveryday life.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:Limitations on space, equipment and personnelimpact success rates and number of students whocan enroll.

05/24/2013 - 39 of 39 students successfully completedverbal and kinesthetic testing of proper techniques forgood stride and gait function, how to balance on onefoot from high to low with a reach, how to changestride and direction to avoid falling or colliding withobstacles.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/10/2013 - 43 of 44 students successfully completedthe assessment listed below.

Presentation/Performance - AssessmentMethod:Individual verbal and kinesthetic testing ofproper techniques for good stride and gait function,how to balance on one foot from high to low with areach, how to change stride and direction to avoidfalling or colliding with obstacles.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/20/2011 - 15/15 =100% of ambulatory students wereable to lengthen their stride or widen/narrow theirstride, hop on one foot and quickly change footworkpatterns to adapt to surfaces changes and unexpectedphysical obstaclesResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011



Related Documents:SLO 359 ASSESSMENT PLAN 1 1711.doc

Assessment Method:Two Minute Stepping Cardio TestAssessment Instrument: Number of steps inplace with knee lifted half way between the kneeand hip of the standing leg in two minutes

Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion:70% of ambulatory students will step 120 ormore steps/complete the two minute step test

02/04/2015 - 100% of ambulatory students were able tostep 120 or more steps/complete the two minute steptestResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

02/03/2014 - Of the ambulatory students, 70% wereable to complete 120 steps or more in a timedassessment.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014

05/24/2013 - 36 pof 36 students who could be assessed,were able to demonstrated improvement and / orcomplete 120 or more steps in the two minute step test.Steps are considered steps in place with knee lifted halfway between the knee and hip of the standing leg intwo minutesResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/10/2013 - 24 of 28 students successfully completedthe Two Minute Stepping Cardio Test Assessment. It isthe number of steps in place with knee lifted half waybetween the knee and hip of the standing leg in twominutes. Ambulatory students will step 120 or moresteps/complete the two minute step test

Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/20/2011 - 15/15 Students = 100% of ambulatoryStudents were able to complete the 2 minute test and/ordo 120 steps or moreResult Type:Criterion met


https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=KmGcE7KJSCQ2



Reporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO 359 ASSESSMENT PLAN 1 1711.doc

01/20/2011 - 15/15 Students = 100% of ambulatoryStudents were able to complete the 2 minute test and/ordo 120 steps or moreResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO 359 ASSESSMENT PLAN 1 1711.doc

Assessment Method:Seated Measurement of shoulder, hip andhamstring FlexibilityAssessment Instrument: Distance of finger tipsapart/overlapping with R arm reach overshoulder and L arm reach behind back followedby L arm over shoulder and R arm behind back;distance of R and L heels from waist for hips;and number of inches both arms reach toward orbeyond toes

Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:70 % of the Students who can ambulate withoutan assistive aid will measure less than 20 inchesin the shoulder reaches, less than 15 inches in theheel to waist reaches and not more than fiveinches negative touching the toes.

02/04/2015 - Over 90 % of the students who canambulate without an assistive measured less than 20inches in the shoulder reaches, less than 15 inches inthe heel to waist reaches and not more than five inchesnegative touching the toes.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

05/24/2013 - 42 of 42 students assessed, 100%, whocould ambulate without an assistive aid measured lessthan 20 inches in the shoulder reaches, less than 15inches in the heel to waist reaches and not more thanfive inches negative touching the toes.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/10/2013 - 36 of 36 students successfully completedshoulder, hip and hamstring Flexibility Assessment (preand post test) using distance of finger tipsapart/overlapping with R arm reach over shoulder and Larm reach behind back followed by L arm overshoulder and R arm behind back; distance of R and Lheels from waist for hips; and number of inches botharms reach toward or beyond toesResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:







2012 - 2013

01/20/2011 - 13/15 Students = 87% of ambulatoryStudents improved in their flexibilityResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO 359 ASSESSMENT PLAN 1 1711.doc

Assessment Method:Standing Balance30 seconds R/LAssessment Instrument: Time balancedconsecutively in 30 seconds on R/L feet wherepossible

Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:70% of Students capable of standing unassistedwill be able to balance for 10 seconds or longeron each foot.

02/04/2015 - 100% of students capable of standingunassisted were able to balance for 10 seconds orlonger on each foot.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

02/03/2014 - Less than 70% of students were able tobalance unassisted for 10 seconds or longer on eitherfoot.Result Type:Criterion not metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:The need for specialized equipment such as avibration platform or Nu-Step machines wouldmake a big difference. The other issue is toreally improve in balance and gait you needmore assisted movement which requires aides.

05/24/2013 - 24 of 24 students who could be assessed,100%, were capabale of standing unassisted andbalance for 10 seconds or longer on each foot and / ordemonstrate improvement based on pre-test assessment.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/10/2013 - 29 of 31 students successfully completedthe assessment. Assessment is Standing Balance30seconds R/L Assessment Instrument: Time balancedconsecutively in 30 seconds on R/L feet where possible.Students capable of standing unassisted will be able tobalance for 10 seconds or longer on each foot






01/20/2011 - 15/15 Students= 100% of Students werecapable of balancing on both right and left feet for 10secondsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLO 359 ASSESSMENT PLAN 1 1711.doc

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 301 -Beginning Wrestling- Skills, Fitness and Concepts - Upon successfulcompletion of this course students will:Demonstrate tactical, technical, fitness and motorskills at a basic level in the sport of wrestling anduse critical thinking to apply skills in acompetitive environment. (Created By SKY Dept- Kinesiology)


Assessment Method:Participation: Students are evaluated based onthe division instituted Fitness Testing Program invarious categories related to strength, endurance,efficiency, flexibility and body composition.Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who completethe course, 80% will show improvement in 2categories.

02/04/2015 - 100% of students who completed thecourse showed improvement in muscular endurance andthe step-test.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

06/05/2013 - 20 of 22 students showed improved bodycomposition and 18 of 22 improved flexibility. Therigor of the class, at least 2.5 hours of high intensityactivity, was responsible for results. Students who didnot improve missed too much class due to injury orpersonal necessity.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

Assessment Method:Exam: Students will be evaluated visually usinga check-point system to grade performance(poor, satisfactory, excellent) on the propertechnique in executing a drill match at abeginning level. Assessment will includeperformance of the basic take down, stand upescape, and set-up.Assessment Method Category:Exam

02/04/2015 - 100% of students at the beginning levelimproved skills scores to a level of satisfactory orhigher by the end of the semester.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

06/05/2013 - 20 of 22 students shoed improvement inbasic skill levels based on a three point rating scale.





Success Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who completethe course, 80% will show improvement in thebasic skills and have an average rating ofsatisfactory or higher.

Class emphasis is on skill development and not strategythus result is expected.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

Assessment Method:Final: Students will be evaluated on tactical,technical, fitness and skills in a live wrestlingmatch situation based on weight classificationand experience.Assessment Method Category:Capstone Assignment/ProjectSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who finish thecourse, 80% will be competitive (based ontechnique, fitness and strategy) in their matches.

02/04/2015 - All students participating in final matcheswere competitive and met criteria. Students wereclassified by weight and assessed on technique prior tocompetition.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

06/05/2013 - 21 of 22 students successfully completedthe tactical exam with a grade of 80% or higher.Students were grouped by weight and skill level.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 302 -Intermediate Wrestling- Skills, Concepts and Fitness - Upon successfulcompletion of this course students will:Demonstrate tactical, technical, fitness and motorskills at an advanced level in the sport ofwrestling and use critical thinking to apply skillsin a competitive environment. (Created By SKYDept - Kinesiology)


Assessment Method:Participation: Students are evaluated based onthe division instituted Fitness Testing Program invarious categories related to strength, endurance,efficiency, flexibility and body composition.Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who completethe course, 80% will show improvement in 2categories.

02/04/2015 - 100% of students showed improvement inthe musuclar strength and step-test assessments.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

06/05/2013 - 10 of 12 students showed improved bodycomposition and 12 of 12 improved muscularendurance. The rigor of the class, at least 2.5 hours ofhigh intensity activity, was responsible for results.Students who did not improve missed too much classdue to injury or personal necessity.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

Assessment Method:Exam: Students will be evaluated visually usinga check-point system to grade performance(poor, satisfactory, excellent) on the propertechnique in executing a drill match at an

02/04/2015 - 100% of students completing the coursedemonstrated improvement based on visual assessment.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:



intermediate level. Assessment will includeperformance of the intermediate take down,stand up escape, and set-up.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who completethe course, 80% will show improvement inintermediate skills and have an average rating ofsatisfactory or higher.

2014 - 2015

06/05/2013 - 10 of 12 students shoed improvement inbasic skill levels based on a three point rating scale.Class emphasis is on skill development and not strategythus result is expected.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

Assessment Method:Final: Students will be evaluated on tactical,technical, fitness and skills in a live wrestlingmatch situation based on weight classificationand experience.Assessment Method Category:Capstone Assignment/ProjectSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: Of the students who finish thecourse, 80% will be competitive (based ontechnique, fitness and strategy) in their matches.

02/04/2015 - 100% of students were successful inhaving a competitive final match. Students wereclassified by weight and technique.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

06/05/2013 - 12 of 12 students successfully completedthe tactical exam with a grade of 80% or higher.Students were grouped by weight and skill level.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 401 -Self Defense- Fitness and wellness - Identify and assess theircurrent fitness level and alter or modify specificwellness or fitness practices in order to improvebody composition /flexibility/ cardiovascularfitness/muscular endurance / muscular strengthrelated to performance in the practice of selfdefense. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)

Course Outcome Status:Inactive

Assessment Method:Final written knowledge exam.55 question written exam

Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:90% of students will pass with a 90% score

01/11/2010 - Of the 22 students who completed thecourse, 17 received a score of 90% or higher on thewritten final exam covering fitness principles.Result Type:Criterion not metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:Impliment clicker technology and assessstudents continually throughout the semester.

Assessment Method:Fitness Tests.Pre and post test comparison.

Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion: 70% of students will increase flexibility by 1

01/11/2010 - Of the 22 students who completed theclass, all 22 improved Fitness scores by at least 1 inchusing the Pre and Post test data from the PEEPevaluationResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010



inch at the end of the semester

Assessment Method:Quiz on fitness and wellness using ResponseCards

Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:70% will achieve a score of 70% or higher

01/11/2010 - NA - Technology not available until toolate in the semester to implement.Result Type:InconclusiveReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010

04/04/2013 - Reassess when responsecards are available to faculty member

Action Plan Category:Conduct Further Assessment

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 401 -Self Defense- Skills and performance - Demonstrate thefundamental skills necessary to perform andprogress at a beginning level in the practice ofself defense. (Created By SKY Dept -Kinesiology)


Assessment Method:Skills Tests10 point scale- checklist

Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion:70% will earn a C or better.

02/03/2014 - Over 80% of the students whosuccessfully completed the class passed the skillschecklist related to self-defense techniques such asblocking, rolling, avoidance, etc....Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014

01/11/2010 - Of the 22 students who completed theclass 16 received a 70% or better on the skills checklist.(72%)Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010

Assessment Method:Final demonstrationFaculty and peer evaluation using a checklist

Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion: 70% will earn a C or better

02/03/2014 - Over 80% of the students who completedthe class were able to complete the final successfullydemonstrating self-defense techniques.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:Class seems to be especially popular withwomen. It may be worth developing on-lineresources for students as well. Teacher requestsprofessional development on latest techniques to



help incorporate information.

01/11/2010 - All 22 students earned a 70% or higher.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:Need to reveiw peer evfaluation piece. Itinvolves students and gets them to evaluate andthink critically. But, they are extremely reluctantto critically evaluate peers which throws off thescoring.

Assessment Method:Skills tests/Final DemonstrationChecklist for application of skills used in finaldemonstration.

Assessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion:70% will show progression in their skills fromthe skills test to the final demonstration.

01/11/2010 - 16 of 22 who completed the coursereceived a grade of 70% or higher.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:Success was tied to participation in course andgeneral fitness level. Need to incorporate somefitness training into skills development

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 404 -Beginning Shotokan Karate- Skills, Concepts and Fitness - Demonstrate thefundamental skills, knowledge, concepts andvocabulary used in the practice of ShotokanKarate to perform and progress at a beginninglevel in this art. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)


Assessment Method:A final exam on the 10 basic blocking, punchingand kicking techniques. Students will beevaluated on a 10 point scale.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: 70% of the students whocomplete the course will rate above 6.0 as anaverage score.

02/04/2015 - 90% of the students who completed thecourse had a rating above 6.0 as an average score.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

01/31/2014 - Of the 21 students who completed thecourse 16 were able to complete the 10 basic blocking,punching and kicking techniques with a 6 or higherrating on the 10 point rubric.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014

06/06/2013 - 16 of 16 Students = 100 % of Studentsreceived a score of 6 or higher on the exam onblocking, punching and kicking techniques.Result Type:Criterion met




12/18/2012 - 17 of 17 students received a score of 6 orhigher on the exam. The exam consisted of thefollowing:

A final exam on the 10 basic blocking, punching andkicking techniques. Students will be evaluated on a 10point scale.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/17/2010 - Assessment Method: Final Exam - BasicsA final exam on the 10 basic blocking, punching andkicking techniques. Students will be evaluated on a 10point scale.

Success Criterion:70% of the students who complete the course will rateabove 6.0 as an average score.

Results: 14 of 15 Students or 93% scored 6.0 or higheron the exam.

Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLOAC Report 404 Fall 10.doc

Assessment Method:A final exam on the individual performance ofthe Shotokan Kata appropriate to the student?sskill level. Students will be evaluated on a 10point scale.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion: Success Criterion: 70% of the students whocomplete the course will rate above 6.0 as anaverage score.

02/04/2015 - 90% of the students who completed thecourse rated above 6.0 as an average score.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

01/31/2014 - 18 or 21 students seperated by leveldemonstrated proficiency (C or higher performance) ofthe Shotokan KataResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014


https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=yeBW2aA4l6gQ


06/06/2013 - 15 of 16 Students = 94 % of Studentsreceived a score of 6 or higher on the exam ratingstudent skills in competition based on level.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/18/2012 - 16 of 17 students received a score of 6 orhigher on the final exam. The final exam consisted ofan assessment on the individual performance of theShotokan Kata appropriate to the students skill level.Students were evaluated on a 10 point scale.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

Assessment Method:Pre and Post Fitness test administered by thedivision. Students will be evaluated onimprovement.Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: 70% of the students whocomplete the course will improve in 2 of thetesting areas.

02/04/2015 - 100% of students improved in themuscular endurance and step-test categories.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

01/31/2014 - All 21 students who completed the classshowed improvement in at least two of five fitnessareas based on the pre-test v. post-test. Most studentsshowed improvement in muscular endurance andflexibility.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014

06/06/2013 - Results: 16 of 16 Students = 100% ofStudents improved their flexibility.Results: 14 of 16 Students = 88% of Studentsimproved their muscular endurance.


12/18/2012 - 15 of 18 students improved flexibility and16 of 18 students improved muscular endurance usingresults from the pre and post test from PEEPResult Type:



Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY COMB 405 -Int. & Adv. Shotokan Karate- Concepts, Skills and Fitness - Demonstrate theintermediate/advanced skills, knowledge,concepts and vocabulary used in the practice ofShotokan Karate to perform and progress at anintermediate / advanced level in this art. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)


Assessment Method:A final exam on intermediate/advanced blocking,punching and kicking techniques. Students willbe evaluated on a 10 point scale.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: 70% of the students whocomplete the course will rate above 6.0 as anaverage score.


06/06/2013 - : 5 of 5 Students = 100 % of Studentsreceived a score of 6 or higher on the exam ratinginteremediate advanced level blocking, punching andkicking.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/18/2012 - 3 of 3 students received a score of 6 orhigher on the exam.A final exam that consisted of anevaluation of intermediate/advanced blocking,punching and kicking techniques. Students wereevaluated on a 10 point scale.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/16/2010 - Assessment Method: Final Exam - BasicsA final exam on the 10 basic, intermediate andadvanced blocking, punching and kicking techniques.Students will be evaluated on a 10 point scale.

Success Criterion:70% of the students who complete the course will rateabove 6.0 as an average score.

Results: 10 of 10 Students or 100% scored 6.0 or higheron the exam.




Related Documents:SLOAC Report 405 Fall 10.doc

Assessment Method:A final exam on the individual performance ofthe Shotokan Kata appropriate to the student?sskill level. Students will be evaluated on a 10point scale.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: 70% of the students whocomplete the course will rate above 6.0 as anaverage score.


06/06/2013 - 5 of 5 Students = 100 % of Studentsreceived a score of 6 or higher on the exam based onskill level in competition.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/18/2012 - 3 of 3 students received a score of 6 orhigher on a final exam on the individual performanceof the Shotokan Kata appropriate to the students skilllevel. Students were evaluated on a 10 point scale.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

Assessment Method:Pre and Post Fitness test administered by thedivision. Students will be evaluated onimprovement.Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:Success Criterion: 70% of the students whocomplete the course will improve in 2 of thetesting areas.

02/04/2015 - 100% of students showed improvement inmuscular endurance and step test categories.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

06/06/2013 - Results: 5 of 5 Students = 100% ofStudents improved their flexibility.Results: 5 of 5 Students = 100% of Students improvedtheir muscular endurance.


12/18/2012 - 3 of 4 students improved flexibility and 4of 4 students improved muscular endurance. Results arebased on data from pre and post test on the PEEPexam.Result Type:


https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=pnjhmj1TDBxG



SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 106 -Varsity Conditioning- Fitness, Concepts and Techniques - Identify andbuild individual / team skills related toconditioning programs for specific sports ,evaluation of various techniques, use ofequipment, scientific knowledge of conditioning,and improve / maintain acceptable and healthybody composition, flexibility, muscular strength,muscular endurance and flexibility. (Created BySKY Dept - Kinesiology)


Assessment Method:Skills testing based on strength and endurancecriteriaAssessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:That 80% or more of the students that completethe class with no physical restrictions will showimprovement in 5 out of 6 categories.

03/16/2015 - In all secions, students showed at greaterthan 80% rate inprovement in strength, endurance,agility, speed and efficiency.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

06/06/2013 - Results: 17/19 Students = 89% ofStudents who complete the class with no physicalrestrictions will showed improvements in 5 out of 6categories. Categories were based on muscular power,speed, endurance, velocity, intensity and sustainability.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

02/08/2011 - 32 of 32 students (100%) of studentsshowed improvement on pre and post testing (skillstesting based on strength and endurance criteria).

Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011Related Documents:SLOAC FITN 106_Fall_ 2010 Sky.doc

Assessment Method:Division Fitness Pre and Post TestsAssessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:80% of the students who complete the class withno physical restrictions will show improvementin 3 areas of the division fitness test.

06/06/2013 - Results: 16/19 = 84% of Studentsimproved (lowered) their systolic and diastolic bloodpressure.Results: 17/19= 89% of Students improved their scoreson the cardiovascular endurance test (step test).Results: 18/19 = 94% of Students improved (increased)their core strength as measure by sit up testing.



https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=lGa6yj1eHgZx


02/08/2011 - 32 of 32 students (100%) showedimprovement in at least half of the tested areas ondivision pre and post fitness tests..


Assessment Method:Students will be examined visually, verbally andkinesthetically in order to make sure they haveassimilated concepts and can apply those toimprove sport specific performance.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:80% of students will demonstrate mastery ofconcepts and application by scoring 75% orbetter on exam.

03/16/2015 - In all sections over 90% of the studentsscored above 75% on mastery and application ofconcepts as related to a specific VARS activity.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

06/06/2013 - Results: 18/19 = 94% of studentsdemonstrated mastery of concepts and application byscoring 75% or better on exam. Exam was based onsoccer specific skills and conditioning.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

02/08/2011 - 32 of 32 (100%) students passed the finalskills tests on improvement of sport specificperformance


SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 107 -Intercollegiate Fitness - Fitness Assessment -Upon successful completion of this coursestudent will be able to:Identify and assess current fitness level as it

Assessment Method:Skills testing based on strength and endurancecriteriaAssessment Method Category:Pre and post testing

03/16/2015 - Over 90% of the students who completedthe course demonsrated improvement in strength,endurance, speed, agility and flexibilityResult Type:Criterion met





pertains to student?s individual sport and alter ormodify specific fitness practices in order tomaintain performance. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)

Start Date:07/27/2012


Success Criterion:That 80% or more of the students that completethe class with no physical restrictions will showimprovement in 5 out of 6 categories.


01/31/2014 - Five sections of FITN 107 were offeredwith much improved results. Over 80% of studentsimproved in all categories. Those who did not werelimited by injury. The availability of a second certifiedtrainer greatly improved return to class time withtreatment and injury prevention exercises.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014

06/06/2013 - Results: 87% (13 of 15) of studentsscored 70% or better on strength and endurance skills.Those skills were bench press, lat pull down, bicep curl,tricep extension, squat, toe raise.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

06/06/2013 - Results: 24/26 Students = 92% ofStudents who complete the class with no physicalrestrictions will showed improvements in 5 out of 6categories.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/11/2012 - 77.2 % (17 of 22) students showedimprovement in 5 out of 6 categories of strength andendurance measured through pre and post testing.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

Assessment Method:Division Fitness Pre and Post TestsAssessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:80% of the students who complete the class withno physical restrictions will show improvementin 3 areas of the division fitness test.

06/06/2013 - Results: 87% (13 of 15) of studentsshowed improvement in muscular strength, muscularendurance and body composition.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

06/06/2013 - Results: 23/26 = 84% of Studentsimproved (lowered) their systolic and diastolic blood



pressure.Results: 26/26= 89% of Students improved their scoreson the cardiovascular endurance test (step test).Results: 25/26 = 94% of Students improved (increased)their core strength as measure by sit up testing.


12/11/2012 - 100% (22 of 22) students showedimprovement in three areas of the division fitness test.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

Assessment Method:Students will be examined visually, verbally andkinesthetically in order to make sure they haveassimilated concepts and can apply those toimprove sport specific performance.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:80% of students will demonstrate mastery ofconcepts and application.

03/16/2015 - Over 90% of the students were able todemonstrate improved efficacy in skills andperformance based on increased conditioning.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

01/31/2014 - Student performance in prescribedactivities related to their sport did improve. Level ofimprovement was greatest in those who were notengaged in off-season activities. However, thesestudents were injured at a much higher rate.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014

06/06/2013 - Results: 93% (14 of 15) of studentsshowed improvement in performance in strngth andconditioning as related to the sport of basketball.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

06/06/2013 - Results: 25/26 students demonstratedmastery of concepts and application by scoring 75% orbetter on exam. Sport specific exam was related tobaseball.Result Type:




12/11/2012 - 90.9 % of students demonstrated masteryof concepts and application in improving sport specificperformance.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 110 -Adult Conditioning- Skills, concepts and techniques - Identify andbuild individual skills related to conditioningprograms for adults applicable to their specificgoals, evaluation of various techniques, use ofequipment, scientific knowledge of conditioning,and improve / maintain acceptable and healthybody composition, flexibility, muscular strength,muscular endurance and flexibility. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)


Assessment Method:A 55 question comprehensive exam related tofunctional exercise, specific motions /movements, anatomy, phisiology and safety. Theexam also includes a self-assessment.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:70% of the students completing the course willget a 70% or higher on the exam.

Related Documents:FITN written final exam 11 22 09.pdfFITN written final exam 11 22 09.pdf

12/29/2012 - 32 of 34 (94%) students received a gradeof 70% or higher on a comprehensive exam related tofunctional exercise, specific motions / movements,anatomy, physiology and safety. The exam alsoincluded self-assessment.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

02/08/2011 - 79% of students passed the final examrelated to functional exercise, specific motions /movements, anatomy, physiology and safety. The examalso included self-assessment


Assessment Method:Skills Testing based on strength and endurancecriteria.Assessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:That 70% of the students enrolled will showimprovement based on 8/12 skill tests.

12/29/2012 - 28 of 32 (88%) students demonstratedimprovement in 8 or more of the assessment tests basedon strength and endurance.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

02/08/2011 - 92% of students showed improvement in12 of 12 strength and endurance skills test areas.


https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=PEhbI5t6HlMV

https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=M5OjU6dAtX59

https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=IV3WKYj7SIBg



Assessment Method:Fitness TestingAssessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:70% of students will show improvement on atleast 2 fitness test results at the post test.

12/29/2012 - 19 of 32 students (59%) showedimprovement in blood pressure and cardiovascularefficiencyResult Type:Criterion not metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

03/22/2013 - Due to high absenteeismin this section, instructor will test nextsemester's class and compare resultsbefore making changes to coursecontent/SLO expectations.

Action Plan Category:Conduct Further Assessment

02/08/2011 - 100% of students showed improvement intheir post test on at least half of the areas.


SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 112 -Cross Training- Fitness Improvement - Improve fitness levels,increase strength and flexibility, and lose body fatthrough participation in a variety of fitnessactivities. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)

Course Outcome Status:Inactive

Assessment Method:Pre- and post-fitness test comparisonAssessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:70% of students will show improvement on atleast 1 fitness test result at the post test.

05/15/2013 - 90% of students improved on at least 1fitness test result at the post test. 76% of studentsimproved their muscular endurance.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/14/2012 - Out of 16 students who completed boththe pre and post-fitness test (FITN 112 AX), 14 showedimprovement on at least one test. Therefore 88%showed improvement on at least one test. On muscular





endurance alone, 88% of students showedimprovement.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/15/2009 - 73% of students improved performance onat least 1 test.73% of students improved their body mass index.67% of students improved their body composition.67% of students improved their 1 minute crunchperformance.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010

Assessment Method:Survey on personal fitnessAssessment Method Category:SurveySuccess Criterion:70% of students will respond positively toquestions about fitness levels at the end of thesemester

Related Documents:Goal Tracking Form for classes.doc

05/20/2013 - 94% of students responded positively toquestions about fitness level improvement at the end ofthe semester.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/04/2012 - 94% (16 of 17 respondents in FITN BX)answered positively to at least 70% of survey questionsabout perceived fitness levels at the end of the semester.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/15/2009 - 95% of responses to questions aboutfitness levels at the end of the semester, were positiveResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010

Assessment Method:Daily participation points in progressiveexercises to improve cardiovascular fitness,strength, and flexibilityAssessment Method Category:Presentation/PerformanceSuccess Criterion:70% of students will complete 80% of daily

05/20/2013 - 76% of students completed at least 80% ofdaily workoutsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013


https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=XHbfDMhnCYFP


workouts

12/13/2012 - 19 of 20 students (FITN 112 BX), 95%, ofstudents earned at least 80% of daily progressiveexercise points to improve cardiovascular fitness,strength, and flexibility.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

05/25/2011 - 88% of students completed 80% of dailyworkouts designed to improve cardiovascular fitness,strength, and flexibilityResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 112 -Cross Training- Fitness self assessment - Be able to identify andassess their current fitness level; alter or modifyspecific wellness or fitness practices in order toimprove bodycomposition/flexibility/cardiovascularfitness/muscular endurance/muscular strengthrelated to performance (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)


Assessment Method:Weight loss/wellness quizAssessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:70% of students will score 70% or better onquestions pertaining to weight loss and wellnessprinciples

03/16/2015 - Of the students who completed the courseslightly less than 80% were able to successfullycomplete the quiz / exam related to weight loss / fitness.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

05/20/2013 - 75% of students scored 70% or better onquestions pertaining to weight loss and wellnessprinciples.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

10/26/2012 - 87% of students correctly answeredquestions pertaining to weight loss and wellnessprinciple. Exam questions were practical inquiriesabout individual food log results.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/15/2009 - 80% of students scored 70% or better onquestions pertaining to weight loss and wellnessprinciples.Result Type:Criterion met




Assessment Method:Fitness and wellness principles quizAssessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:70% of students will correctly identify the role offitness in physical and mental wellbeing; 70% ofstudents will score 70% or better on multiplechoice quiz

05/17/2013 - 90% of students correctly identified therole of fitness in physical and mental well-being; 76%scored 70% or better on a multiple choice quiz.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/10/2012 - 80% of students who completed thefitness and wellness quiz scored 70% or betterResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

05/20/2011 - 96% scored 70% or better on multiplechoice quiz on fitness and wellness principles.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011

Assessment Method:Journal or small group discussion on fitnessprinciplesAssessment Method Category:OtherSuccess Criterion:70% of students will list and summarize fitnessdiscussion points from in-class lecture/discussion

01/31/2014 - All students who completed the course(100%), we able to list and summarize fitnessdiscussion points from in-class lecture/discussion in ajournal exercise log.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014

05/08/2013 - 90% of students were able to list andsummarize discussion points from in-class lecture anddiscussion in a small group setting.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/06/2012 - 95% of students completed a fitnessjournal which included fitness/wellness discussionpoints as applied to weight loss or fitness goals.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013



12/09/2010 - 74% of students listed and summarizedfitness discussion points from in-classlecture/discussionsResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2010 - 2011

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 112 -Cross Training- Role of fitness in wellbeing - Identify/explainthe role of physical fitness and fitness principlesin both physical and mental wellbeing

(Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)


Assessment Method:Division Wellness QuizAssessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:70% of students will score 70% or better on amultiple choice quiz

Related Documents:Division ISLO test.doc

05/20/2013 - 75% of students scored 70% or better on amultiple choice quiz pertaining to fitness and wellness.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/04/2012 - 80% of students who completed theDivision Wellness Quiz scored 70% or betterResult Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

05/17/2010 - 100% of students scored 70% or better onthe division wellness exam.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010

Assessment Method:Journal- students will track fitness activities andfeelings in a journal over the course of thesemesterAssessment Method Category:OtherSuccess Criterion:70% of students will exhibit positive mentalchanges brought about by physical fitnessactivities

05/20/2013 - 83% of students exhibited positive mentalchanges brought about by class fitness activities.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/11/2012 - 80% of students, while tracking dailyfitness activities in a journal, expressed positive mentalchanges/feelings of accomplishment/sense of fitnessand wellness improvement through course activities.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/14/2010 - 75% of students exhibited positive mentalchanges brought about by physical fitness activities intheir journal entries.


https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=8RnYSkJuIiZA



Assessment Method:Goal setting/goal attainment- students will set 3realistic goals relating to fitness, set both an in-class and out of class workout schedule, andfollow their plan to achieve their goalsAssessment Method Category:OtherSuccess Criterion:70% of students will reach at least one of theirsemester goals pertaining to fitness/wellness

03/16/2015 - Over 90% of the students were able tomeet multiple goals.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

01/31/2014 - Multiple sections were taught utlizing avarity of modes of conditioning (aerobic andanaerobic), means (running, cycling, sprinting,resistance training, edurance training) andmethodologies. In all cases, students at greayter than90% were able to achieve pre-test goals.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2013 - 2014

05/20/2013 - 76% of students reached at least one oftheir semester goals pertaining to fitness/wellness.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

12/06/2012 - 95% of students set 3 realistic goalsrelated to fitness and a plan for attaining the goals.70% of students reached at least one goal.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

05/15/2009 - 85% of students achieved at least one oftheir semester goals pertaining to fitness/wellness.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 116 -Body Conditioning- Skills. Concepts and Techniques - Identify and

Assessment Method:A 55 question comprehensive exam related tofunctional exercise, specific motions /

03/16/2015 - Of the students who completed the classmore than 70% attempted and completed the exam.Result Type:



build individual skills related to conditioningprograms applicable to their specific goals,evaluation of various techniques, use ofequipment, scientific knowledge of conditioning,and improve / maintain acceptable and healthybody composition, flexibility, muscular strength,muscular endurance and flexibility. (Created By SKY Dept - Kinesiology)


movements, anatomy, physiology and safety.The exam also includes a self-assessment.Assessment Method Category:ExamSuccess Criterion:70% of the students completing the course willget a 70% or higher on the exam.

Related Documents:FITN written final exam 11 22 09.pdf


05/24/2013 - 22 of 25 students earned a 70% or higheron a 55 question comprehensive exam related tofunctional exercise, specific motions / movements,anatomy, physiology and safety. The exam alsoincludes a self-assessment.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/10/2013 - 30 of 38 (79%) students earned a 70% orhigher on a 55 question comprehensive exam related tofunctional exercise, specific motions / movements,anatomy, physiology and safety. The exam alsoincluded a self-assessment.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

Assessment Method:Skills testing based on strength and endurancecriteriaAssessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:That 70% of the students who complete thecourse will show improvement in 8/12 skill tests.

03/16/2015 - Of the 12 skills test, the majority ofstudents, but not 70%, showed improvement. Cardioscores were strongest but in other areas related toagility, speed, balance, etc... gains were not achieved.Possible need for more functional space.Result Type:InconclusiveReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:Need for more functional space in currenttraining area.

01/31/2014 - Numerous sections were taught in thisclass with some varied results. Result variation wasbased on student goals as the class is more general innature and focused on student goals and engagement.Over 80% of students completed the class with theseitems being consistent through sections:

Cardiovascular equipment is quite popular and a focusMove away from machine to functional trainingNeed for more open space for speed and agilitytraining.


https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=PEhbI5t6HlMV



05/24/2013 - 28 of 28 students demonstratedimprovement in more that 8 of the 12 skill area assessedrelated to muscular endurance and stamina.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

01/10/2013 - 33 of 38 (87%) students improved in 8 ormore categories on pre and post testing (skills testingbased on strength and endurance criteria).Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

06/13/2010 - 24 of 28 students (86%) showedimprovement in at least 8 out of 12 skills tests on preand post testing (skills testing based on strength andendurance criteria).Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2009 - 2010Related Documents:Fitness Class_List_Spring_116 _Summary only 2010-6 13 10.pdf

Assessment Method:Fitness Pre and Post TestsAssessment Method Category:Pre and post testingSuccess Criterion:70% of students will show improvement in 2areas of the division instituted fitness test.

03/16/2015 - Of the students who completed the classslightly more than 80% improved in at least two areas.Most consistent areas noted were muscular enduranceand strength.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2014 - 2015

01/31/2014 - Over 80% of students showedimprovement in two or more fitness areas. These wasdiversily spread amond all components of fitness -muscular strength, muscular endurance, cardiovascularefficiency, body composition and flexibility. Factorssuch as balance and agility also improved.Result Type:


https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=cKDRCdepX24U

https://sanmateo.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=cKDRCdepX24U



05/24/2013 - 21 of 25 students demonstrated improvedmuscular endurance; 17 of 25 students demonstratedimproved flexibility; 16 of 25 students demonstratedimproved body composition; 10 of 25 studentsdemonstrated improved cardiovascular efficiency.Result Type:InconclusiveReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013Resources Needed to Implement Action Plan:70% threshold was met only related to muscularendurance. Body composition and flexibilitywere slightly below that. Body composition testis subject to human error and as such it'spossible that total numbers have a margin oferror that could put result over 70%.

01/10/2013 - 25 of 33 students (75%) improved inflexibility and 31 of 33 (94%) in muscular enduranceon the division-instituted fitness test.Result Type:Criterion metReporting Cycle:2012 - 2013

SKY Dept - Kinesiology - SKY FITN 166 -Golf Fitness- Fitness improvement - Identify and assesscurrent fitness level as it pertains to golf and alteror modify specific fitness practices in order toimprove performance, increase strength,flexibility and cardiovascular fitness (Created BySKY Dept - Kinesiology)


Assessment Method:Self assessment surveyAssessment Method Category:SurveySuccess Criterion:70% of students will respond positively to surveyon performance increases

03/16/2015 - 100% of students who completed the classwere able to correctly assess their fitness level. Studentswere able to improve strength through g