slides adapted from

27
Slides adapted from Michael P. Frank's course based on the text Discrete Mathematics & Its Applications (5 th Edition) by Kenneth H. Rosen CS2013 Mathematics for Computing Science Adam Wyner University of Aberdeen Computing Science

Upload: dorjan

Post on 07-Feb-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

CS2013 Mathematics for Computing Science Adam Wyner University of Aberdeen Computing Science. Slides adapted from Michael P. Frank ' s course based on the text Discrete Mathematics & Its Applications (5 th Edition) by Kenneth H. Rosen. Predicate Logic Continued. Agenda. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Slides adapted from

Slides adapted fromMichael P. Frank's course based on the textDiscrete Mathematics & Its Applications

(5th Edition)by Kenneth H. Rosen

CS2013Mathematics for Computing Science

Adam WynerUniversity of Aberdeen

Computing Science

Page 2: Slides adapted from

Predicate LogicContinued

Page 3: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 3

Agenda

• Bound and free variables• Vacuous quantification• Empty domains• Complex expressions

– False antecedents– Quantifiers with logical connectives– Nested quantifiers

• Quantifier equivalences• Defining (or not) other quantifiers

Page 4: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 4

Bound and Free Variables

• What do we say about the quantifiers and variables in the following expressions (same point with )?– B(x)– x B(y,x)– x(B(x) A(y))– xy (B(y) A(x))

• A "relationship" between the variable associated with the quantifier and variable associated with the predicate. Cannot vary the variable unless it is bound.

Page 5: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 5

Bound and Free Variables

• An expression like P(x) is said to have a free variable x (i.e., x is not “specified”). "She is happy" does not have a truth value unless we know whom "she" denotes.

• When we indicate whom "she" is, we can determine if it is true with respect to a model.

Page 6: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 6

Bound and Free Variables

• A quantifier (either or ) operates on an expression having one or more free variables, and it binds one or more of those variables to produce an expression having one or more bound variables.

• Expression with one free variable: P(x)• Expression with the x binding the variable x

x P(x)

Page 7: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 7

Example of Binding

• P(x,y) has 2 free variables, x and y.• x P(x,y) has 1 free variable and one bound

variable.• An expression with zero free variables is a bona-

fide (actual) proposition.P(jill',bill')

Page 8: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 8

Formal Definition of Free Variables

• The free-variable occurrences in an atomic formula are all the variable occurrences in that atomic formula.

• The free-variable occurrences in are the free-variable occurrences in .

• The free-variable occurrences in ( connective ) are the free-variable occurrences in plus the free-variable occurrences in

• The free-variable occurrences in x and x are the free-variable occurrences in except for any occurrences of x.

Page 9: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 9

Examples

• Occurrences of variables that are not free are bound. Start from atomic formula and work outwards. Which (if any) variables are free in:

1. x P(x)2. x P(x)3. y Q(x)4. x P(b)5. x(y R(x,y))6. x(y R(x,z))

.A x x P(x)

.B x (P(x)) Q(x)

.C y Q(y) x Q(x)

Page 10: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 10

Examples

1. x P(x) (no free variable)2. x P(x) (no free variables)3. y Q(x) (x is a free variable)4. x P(b) (no free variables)5. x(y R(x,y)) (no free variables)6. x(y R(x,z)) (z is a free variable)

Page 11: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 11

Exercise

Suppose (x:=a), where (x:=a) is the result of substituting all free occurrences of the variable x in by the constant a.

What is ?1. P(x)

2. R(x,y)

3. P(b)

4. x P(x)

5. yQ(x)

Page 12: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 12

Exercise

1. P(x) P(a)

2. R(x,y) R(a,y)

3. P(b) P(b)

4. x P(x) x P(a)

5. yQ(x) y Q(a)

Page 13: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 13

Vacuous Quantification

• Recall definition: Let be a formula. Then x is true in D if every expression (x:=a) is true in D, and false otherwise.

• xP(b) is true in D if every expression of the form P(b)(x:=a) is true in D, and false otherwise.

• What is the set of all the expression of the form P(b)(x:=a)?

Page 14: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 14

xP(b)

• What is the set of all expressions of the form P(b)(x:=a)?

• That’s the singleton set {P(b)} !• xP(b) is true in D if P(b) is true, and false

otherwise.• So, xP(b) means the same as P(b)

Page 15: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 15

Empty Domains

• Let be a formula. Then the proposition x is true in D if every expression (x:=a) is true in D, and false otherwise.

This is read as follows:• Let be a formula. Then the proposition

x is false in D if at least one expression (x:=a) is false in D, and true otherwise.

Page 16: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 16

could have been defined as

• Let be a formula. Then the proposition x is true in D if D is nonempty and every expression (x:=a) is true in D, and false otherwise.– Under this definition, x P(x) would have been false

whenever D is empty. Every teddy_bear is happy is false in a model where there is nothing. Sadness!

• But that’s not how it's done!

Page 17: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 17

Suppose D is Empty

Suppose D is empty.

x P(x) (e.g., P(x) means “x is occupied.”) is true (sometimes called “vacuously true”).

For the same reason, x P(x) is also true.

Page 18: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 18

Consequences of the Standard Position

Two logical equivalences in Predicate Logic:

x P(x) x P(x) (“no counterexample against P”)

x P(x) x P(x)

So, one of the two quantifiers suffices (cf., functional completeness of a set of connectives in propositional logic)

We’ll return to these equivalences later.

Page 19: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 19

False Antecedent

• Suppose M2: where D = {jill, bill, phil, will, mary}, is_happy' denotes {jill, bill, phil}, is_rich' denotes {}.

• x (is_rich'(x) is_happy'(x))• Is this formula T or F? Recall your T-tables for .• It is clear that no constant for x will make is_rich'(x) true

since the denotation of is_rich'(x) is empty. In other words, yQ(y).

Page 20: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 20

False Antecedent

• Then Q(a) P(a) is true for every a (since Q(a) is false for every a)

• Consequently x (Q(x) P(x)) is true because Q(x) is false for every a.

• A proposition with a false antecedent is true!• We sometimes say the formula is vacuously true.

Yet, because the antecedent is always false, you can never use the formula to conclude that P holds of something.

Page 21: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 21

Vacuous truth

• Example 1: Think of a tax form: “Have you sent us details about all your children?” You have no children, so you’ve complied (without doing anything).

• Example 2: Think of our definition of (x:=a) as “the result of substituting all free occurrences of x in by a”No occurrences, so don't do anything (after which it’s true that all occurrences have been substituted)

Page 22: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 22

Quantifiers with Connectives

Let the D be parking spaces at ABDN.Let P(x) be "x is occupied."Let Q(x) be "x is free of charge."What do the following mean/paraphrase?When are they T/F (construct models)?

1. x (Q(x) P(x))2. x (Q(x) P(x)) 3. x (Q(x) P(x))4. x (Q(x) P(x))

Page 23: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 23

Construct English paraphrases

1. x (Q(x) P(x))2. x (Q(x) P(x))3. x (Q(x) P(x))4. x (Q(x) P(x))

1. Some places are free of charge and occupied2. All places are free of charge and occupied 3. All places that are free of charge are occupied4. For some places x, if x is free of charge then x is occupied

Page 24: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 24

Construct a Model where 1 and 4 are T, while 2 and 3 are F

1. x (Q(x) P(x)) (true for place a below)2. x (Q(x) P(x)) (false for places b below)3. x (Q(x) P(x)) (false for place b below)4. x (Q(x) P(x)) (true for place a below)

M4: a model where D = {a, b}, I(Q) = {a, b}, I(P) = {a}.

Page 25: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 25

Construct a Model where 1 and 3 and 4 are T, but 2 is F

1. x (Q(x) P(x)) 2. x (Q(x) P(x)) 3. x (Q(x) P(x)) 4. x (Q(x) P(x))

M4: a model where D = {a, b}, I(Q) = {a}, I(P) = {a, b}.

Page 26: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 26

About x (Q(x) P(x))

x (Q(x) P(x))For some x, if x is free of charge then x is occupied x (Q(x) P(x)) is true iff, for some place a,Q(a) P(a) is true.Q(a) P(a) is true iff Q(a) is false or P(a) is true.

Some place is either (not free of charge) or some place (is occupied).

Page 27: Slides adapted from

Fall 2013 Frank / van Deemter / Wyner 27

Further

Remainder of Predicate Logic topics next week.Then Proof.