sm ii- review
DESCRIPTION
strategic managementTRANSCRIPT
2SAROJ K PANI
Summary of the course
3© SAROJ K PANI
Course Progression
ManagingPortfolio
(Multi-BusinessStrategy)
Strategic Management-II Course
ManagingProcess
(ImplementationStrategy)
Success = fn ( Strategy Content & Strategy Execution)
ManagingFormulation-
Implementation Gape.g. internal
structural issues
ManagingFormulation-
Implementation Gape.g. internal
structural issues
Implementation /Process
ExternalFocus:
Product/Factor
Markets
Corporate Strategy
InternalFocus:
Organization
4© SAROJ K PANI
Review
o Basic Analytic Frameworkso SWOT and PEST
o Porter’s Five Force
o Core Competence
o RBV
o Value Chain Analysis
5SAROJ K PANI
Nomenclature
What are the different kinds of strategy?
o Internal Orientation
o Corporate, Business, Functional
(business : how to compete in a given domain)
(corporate : which domains to compete in)
o External Orientation
o Competitive, Co-operative, Co-optive
6SAROJ K PANI
Portfolio Analysis : BCG Matrix
Relative Market Share
MarketGrowthRate
High Low
High
Low
•High mkt. growth & share
•Profit potential
•Heavy investment needed tofinance rapid growth
•High mkt. growth, low share• Build into Stars or phase out• Very heavy investmentneeded if to build share
•Low growth, high share• Established, successful• Produce cash
•Low mkt. growth & share• Low profit potential
Hold Build (or harvest or divest)
Hold (or harvest) Hold (or harvest or divest)
7SAROJ K PANI
Portfolio Analysis : GE Matrix
Note: Circle - Size of relevant Market; Part of circle- Business's market share
Industry AttractivenessHigh
High
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Invest/Grow
Selectivity/earnings
Harvest/Divest
8© SAROJ K PANI
Nucor Steel : Why Nucor did well?
o Market power ?
o Limited market share.
o Firm specific efficiency effects?
o People Plant
o Business Model Narrow set of activities
o it outsources procurement of scrap (to avoid competition amongplant mangers to find the lowest possible scrap price, according toCEO Iverson)
o does little in the way of marketing and research, traditionallyconceived.
o Why Nucor’s apparently superior organizational policies have not beenmore widely imitated?
9© SAROJ K PANI
Nucor Steel
o Used disruptive technology to unsettle industry norms
o Moved up the value chain
o From low- cost price competitor premium niche large scale
premium
….and Intel learned from them when Cristension visited Intel
Product Market Choice
10© SAROJ K PANI
Newell’s system of creating value
Time
MarketValueCreated
Low
High
AcquireUnderperforming
Target
One Year Two Years Three Years
Install Systems Upgrade Systems
Install Financial Controls Maintain Controls
Operational Streamlining Continue Streamlining
“New
elliz
atio
n”
Improving Customer Service
Developing Merchandising Programs
Transferring Best Practices
Maintaining Relationship with Customers
Leveraging Corporate ExperienceCo
rpor
ate
Adv
anta
ge
11© SAROJ K PANI
Newell : Key Points
o Corporate Advantage whole that is more than the sum of itsparts
o An “acid test” for this is whether being part of a larger corporate entityadds value to a firm’s individual businesses, and whether that valuecreation continues over time. Corporate advantage is intimately related tocompetitive advantage.
o Newell has a fortuitous combination of specific and generalresources
o The resources are general enough to be leveraged across a number ofbusinesses but specific enough to play an important role in the competitiveadvantage of each.
12© SAROJ K PANI
Newell: Key Points
o Effective corporate strategies must be consistent both internallyand externally
o Internally, corporate strategies are systems of interconnected elementsthat continually reinforce each other.
Newell’s strategy started with a clear vision of how the firm would compete. Toimplement that vision, the company built the requisite resources, tailored itsorganization to the strategy, and entered a set of concordant businesses that hadremarkably similar key success factors. As Daniel Ferguson said, “we are in onlyone business.” The products were different, but the logic, and the resourcesthat were critical to competitive advantage in each were the same.
o Externally, the strategy advantageously positioned the firm to takeadvantage of the development of discount retailing. The company wasprescient in identifying the trend, and developing a strategy that was consistentwith those opportunities.
13© SAROJ K PANI
Newell: Key Points
o Act proactively to upgrade the resource base, and acquire newadvantage in response to a changing environment.
o Newell’s decisions to acquire Calphalon and Rubbermaid are examples of(may be) a company acting proactively to upgrade its resource base, andlayer on new advantages in response to a changing environment. However,neither acquisition is a clear “lay-up”—both are riddled with potentialdrawbacks.
Newell’s struggles in this regard are eye-opening and provide insight intothe difficulties managers face when they seek to improve a company’sresources, or to redefine—however slightly—its corporate advantage.
14SAROJ K PANI
HP and Compaq : Does it make sense?
o The merger creates value
o Fiorina argues, that will create value: eliminating the overlapping lines
will create cost savings, and the complementary business lines will create
revenue synergies through cross-selling in the IT-services segment.
What is the Synergy ? How much it is?
VCompaq alone + VSynergies > Vconsideration Paid by HP
Synergy evaluation. But M&A is not all about evaluation
15SAROJ K PANI
Acquisition : More than Valuation
o Did Carly Fiorina failed to communicate well to the shareholders
(especially to Hewlett and other ~48% share holders)
o What do you think about the interpersonal relationships : playing and
shaping this corporate game?
o Why ISS Changed? What about Deutsche Bank’s decision?
16SAROJ K PANI
HP-Compaq: Points to Ponder
o The final judgment about the HP-Compaq deal hinges on what
“winning” means ?
o Measured financially?
o Strategically?
o Operationally?
o What the benchmark of performance is?
17SAROJ K PANI
o How should we measure performance of an alliance such as
this?
o Are financial measures alone appropriate indicators of
success?
o At what cost success was achieved?
o Against what alternatives should we evaluate the alliance?
Xerox- Fuji Xerox: Is the alliance successful?
18SAROJ K PANI
Xerox- Fuji Xerox : Lessons
o Alliances are dynamic: they evolve in response to changes in the capabilitiesand needs of the partners and in the external competitive environment. Often,the very logic of collaboration will change, and an alliance can grow to fulfill afunction different its original mission.
o As a result, they need to be managed flexibly, using a wide array oforganizational structures and processes. Even if one aspect of a relationshipremains unchanged (e.g. ownership structure), other aspects (e.g. contractualrelations) may be used to adjust the roles of the partners.
o There is an inherent—and often problematic—tradeoff between allianceautonomy and integration into a firm’s strategy. The optimal balance betweenthe two depends on the role of the alliance in the parents’ strategies and onmarket and technological conditions
19SAROJ K PANI
o Ecosystem ?
Competitive Advantage of Nations
Does it improve competitiveness ?
20SAROJ K PANI
Porter’s Diamond : Competitive Advantage of Nations
21SAROJ K PANI
Big Bazzar: Key Points
o Knowledge of Local consumers
o How to exploit that – in house
o Replicate – when you internationalize
o Familiarity with labour and capital market
o Innovate the best fund design, supply chain.
o Familiarity help in talent, geography selection
o Leverage this to gain a toe-hold in similar markets while
internationalizing
22SAROJ K PANI
Big Bazzar: Key Points
o Dealing with institutional voids
o Can you create alternative or go-around it?
o If alternative – at what level ?
o If go-around it – how do you deal when there is
institutional build up?
o Innovations to overcome institutional void. Voids as
business opportunities.
o Use those innovations to internationalize.
23SAROJ K PANI
Strategic Review at Egon Zehnder International: Key Learning
o Comparison : Business Model of EZI and competitors : How EZI
managed such robust business model, what did they do internally to
people and processes.
o Effect of disruptive technology : How is the effect going to be?; Is
the tech. stable/how much threat it contain?
o Reaction to change (firm level) : Managing interests and opinions
o Managing strategic myopia (is strategic review the first step?)
o The trade off between old values and urge to change : How to
manage?
24SAROJ K PANI
The Transnational Organization: Integrated Network Structure
The Integrated Network
Coordinated Federation
Centralized Hub Decentralized Federation
25SAROJ K PANI
Organizational – Structural Characteristics
DecentralizedFederation
CoordinatedFederation
Centralized Hub
Strategic Approach Multinational International Global
Example of HomeCountry
Europe USA Japan
Key StrategicCapability
Decentralized andnationally self-sufficient
Sources of corecompetency centralized,others decentralized
Centralized andglobally scaled
Role of overseasoperation
Sensing and exploitinglocal opportunities
Adapting and leveragingparent -companycompetencies
Implementingparent companystrategies
Development anddiffusion ofknowledge
Knowledge developedand retained withineach unit
Knowledge developed atthe center andtransferred to overseasunits
Knowledgedeveloped andretained at thecenter
26SAROJ K PANI
Building the Transnational
o Recognizes structures as a blunt instrument of change
o Simultaneous changes organization's anatomy, Physiology,psychology
Modify individual attitudes/mentalities (Psychology)
Develop new processes/relationships (Physiology)
Confirm with redefined structures/responsibilities (Anatomy)
27SAROJ K PANI
Review : Balanced score card
o Performance ? What are the indicators?
o Implications : cost centre vs. profit centre OR activity centers
o Role of middle managers
o How major perspectives might be linked
28SAROJ K PANI
The Four Broad Perspectives: Balanced Score Card
29SAROJ K PANI
Balanced Score Card : Managing the Four Processes
30SAROJ K PANI
Product Development Process : M&M – Creating Scorpio
31SAROJ K PANI
Resource Allocation : Different Types of Resources
o Asset :Ownership
o Factor : Ownership &/or Control
o Tradable Factor and Non-tradable factoro Identifiable and monetarily determined by strategic factor market
o Asset Flow :resources that can be obtained and adjusted immediately
o Asset Stock : Cant be adjusted immediately, built up over time overasset flow.
o Contained resources : comprised of identifiable simple network ofresources factors that can be monetarily valued.
o System resource : Complex network of firm’s resources factors
o Network don’t have definite boundary
o Determining monetary value is implausible
32SAROJ K PANI
Getting Resources
33SAROJ K PANI
Knowledge
Making personal knowledge available to others is the central activity of
knowledge creating company
Knowledge
ExplicitKnowledge
TacitKnowledge
34SAROJ K PANI
The Knowledge Creating Company
• Tacit to TacitSocialization
• Tacit to ExplicitArticulation
• Explicit to ExplicitCombination
• Explicit to TacitInternalization
35SAROJ K PANI
Review : Jack Welch
o Do you add value at each stage of your leadership?
o A leaders is personal : can you get to the skin/heart of theindividuals?
o Transformation : self as well as organization
o From Strategy, Structure, System TO Purpose, Process, People
36SAROJ K PANI
Some key conclusions : Jack WelchElements of a new era of management leadership
A new management philosophy (can you enable a constant renewal – self, org.?)
•Beyond strategy, structure, system to purpose, process, people
A different concept of organization (can you get to the skin of your people?)
•From “organization man” to “individualized corporation”
A changing role for managers (can you lead change and adapt others to it?)
•Beyond allocators, controllers, and implementers to leaders, developers, andentrepreneurs
37SAROJ K PANI
Review : Corporate Governance
o Principal -agent problem
o Principal -principal problem
o Corporate Governance : Indian Scenarioo Interlocking directorate
o Why it is important for organizations?
o Why it is important for you?
Corporate Governance Mechanism
Structural element is important OR Human element is important?
Are they complementary ?
38SAROJ K PANI
Market?
Entrepreneurs?
Producers?
Fortunefor/at
Bottom ofPyramid
Bottom of the Pyramid
Thank You
SAROJ K PANI 39