smart-navigation projectdesignation: general project manager nationality: republic of korea...

e-Navigation today and in the futureSession 1

SMART-Navigation Project

Dr Han Jin Lee

General Project ManagerSMART-Navigation Project Office

Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO)

Dr Han Jin Lee

Organization: SMART-Navigation Office, KRISO

Designation: General Project Manager

Nationality: Republic of Korea

Curriculum Vitae

Han Jin LEE is the General Project Manager of the SMART-Navigation Project, a Korean e-Navigation

project that runs from 2016 to 2020. He aims to develop a system that can provide real maritime

services for ship safety in Korean waters from 2021. At the same time, he is a Principal Researcher at

the Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO) and has been with KRISO since

1997. His role at KRISO is to conduct research and development related to ship navigation safety. He

holds a Ph.D. in Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering from Seoul National University.

Abstract

The SMART-Navigation project, planned by Korea and currently underway, has invested about $100

million from 2016 to 2020 for implementing an information service system to prevent ship accidents

in Korean waters and building communication infrastructure to provide the services to ships. Once the

SMART-Navigation system has begun to be applied from 2021, active support from the shore will be

possible to minimize human errors in risk assessment. If an accident such as a collision or grounding

is expected, warning or alarm is provided in advance to Electronic Chart System (ECS) of the ship

based on the location and speed information of all ships including fishing boats. Furthermore, ENCs,

weather information, and dynamic hydrographic information are provided in real-time so that even

small ships such as fishing boats can make the proper decision making. Furthermore, ships that are

used by many people at the same time, such as passenger ships, are also provided with specialized

services such as safe route guidance and sharing of sensor information on board. Now the project is

in the final stage. There have been many issues over the years. In this presentation, I will introduce

the major issues among them and the efforts of the R&D team to solve them.

20

Asia-Pacific

SMART-Navigation Project

Sep. 8, 2020

Han Jin LEE

01 SMART-Navigation Project at a glance

2

1029

1621

1794

19392013

536

741 755

943 955

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Num

ber o

f acc

iden

t shi

ps

Year

Fishing boats Non-Fishing boats

65,906 88%

8,985 12%

Number of registered ships In Korea (2018)

Fishing boats Non-Fishing boats

2120


3


ID Service Dedicated user/ship PhysicalLink

Sv.1 Navigation Monitoring & Assistance Service (NAMAS) • High risk ships LTE-Maritime

VDES

Sv.2 Ship-borne System Monitoring Service (SBSMS)

• Passenger ships with Korean Flag (International/Domestic) LTE-Maritime

VDES, etc• Ships requiring the service

Sv.3 Safe & Optimal Route Planning Service (SORPS)

• Passenger ships with Korean Flag (International/Domestic) LTE-Maritime

VDES, etc• Ships requiring the service

Sv.4 Real-time Electronic Navigational Chart Distribution & Streaming Service (REDSS) • Non-SOLAS Ships LTE-Maritime

Sv.5-1 Pilots/Tugs Assistance Service (PITAS) • Pilot LTE-Maritime

Sv.5-2 Maritime Environment and Safety Information Service (MESIS) • Ships requiring the service LTE-Maritime

VDES, etc

4

SMART-Navigation Project l Dr Han Jin Lee

22

Asia-Pacific


2014Planning research for Korean e-Navigation strategy

2015Preliminary feasibility study (ended)

JUL

Korea e-Navigation forum foundation

DEC

Korean e-Navigation strategic implementationplan confirmation

2016Selected as a world-class technical support targets

(Steering committee of National Science and Technology Council)

MAR Selection of SMART-Navigation Project Office

2017

Start of the SMART-Navigation Project

Completion of the SMART-Navigation Project

AUG

FEB

NOV

JUL

DEC2021

5

2013

2020

02 Implementation of the SMART-Navigation System

6

Ref. IMO NCSR 1/28 Annex 7

Securing communication means to access information services at sea

2322


7

LTE-Maritimeoperation center

Section-A Section-BWired

networkBase station

GNSS Data

Router

Coverage: 0 ~ 30 kmData rate (DL): 6 MbpsData rate (UL): 3 Mbps

GNSS Data

Coverage: 30 ~ 100 kmData rate (DL): 3 MbpsData rate (UL): 1 Mbps


8

LTE-MaritimeTransceiver

OmniAntenna


24

Asia-Pacific


9


Standardization of data communication protocols that anyone can access services regardless of vessel type or nationality


10

2524


11


Providing standardized data that can be used by both Korean flagged vessels and vessels of other countries


12

Ref. IHO S-100 Brochure


26

Asia-Pacific


13

Standard Data Model for SMART-Navigation

NAMAS Service Data Model

CollisionAlarmGroundAlarm

WaypointAlarmTrafficSeparationAlarm

RestrictedAreaAlarm

To Service From Service-

SBSMS Service Data Model

To Service From ServiceSensorInformation

SORPS Service Data Model

ResponseRouteConfirmRoute

EndRoute

To Service From ServiceRequestRoute

REDSS Service Data Model

ZoneInformationENCDownloadENCStreaming

To Service From ServiceENCZoneServiceRequest

ENCServiceRequestENCStreamingCertificate

-Request

PITAS Service Data Model

ShipDynamicInformationShipDensityServiceResponse

PortGuidelineResponsePortListReponse

…

To Service From ServiceShipVoyageInformation

ShipPositionPredictRequestShipDensityRequest

PortGuidelineRequest…

MESIS Service Data Model

MIODownload

To Service From ServiceMIOServiceRequest

[ Refer to ]1. Route plan

exchange format(RTZ)

e-Navigation Service Common Data Model

SystemAcknowledgmentDownloadAcknowledgment

To Service From ServiceMobliePosition

ServiceFailAcknowledgementPredictedAccident

VerifyAccidentVerifyAccidentAcknowledgment

SpreadAccidentSpreadAcknowledgment

EmergencyReport NavigationalMode

[ Use ]1. S-100 Exchange Set Metadata Model 2. S-100 Product Model (S-102, S-104, S-111, S-122, S-123, S-124, S-127, S-128, S-201, S-412, S-413, S-414)

[ Use ]1. S-100 Exchange Set Model 2. S-101 ENC Product Model


14


Preparing onboard devices to display information provided by services accurately

2726


15


16


Design of a service architecture that provides the necessary information at the right time to help prevent accidents


28

Asia-Pacific


17

03 Conclusions

•

•

•

•

•

18

2928

03 Conclusions

Networks

Protocols

Data

Devices

Services

19

Digitalization

Port Automation

MASS

e-Navigation

SMART-Nav.Experience



e-Navigation in the future

Mr Nick Lemon

Manager Systems SafetyStandards division

Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA)

Mr Nick Lemon

Organization: Australian Maritime Safety Authority

Designation: Manager Systems Safety

Nationality: Australia

Curriculum Vitae

Nick Lemon is Manager, Systems Safety at the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA).

Nick joined AMSA in 2003 after a career in the Australian Navy as a navigation officer and a hydrographic

surveyor. He commanded two of the Navy’s survey vessels.

Nick’s role at AMSA has a current and a future focus, with responsibilities including:

ㆍ AMSA’s Aids to Navigation network meeting the needs of safe navigation in Australian coastal waters,

ㆍ the national competent authority for VTS in Australia, and

ㆍ advice on navigation safety and maritime systems, such as:

- digital maritime information exchange,

- human factors in maritime safety, and

- general navigational and nautical advice.

Nick represents AMSA domestically and internationally on systems and navigation safety matters.

Abstract

The International Maritime Organization embarked on developing the concept of e-navigation in 2006 and

settled on this definition:

“the harmonized collection, integration, exchange, presentation and analysis of marine information on board

and ashore by electronic means to enhance berth to berth navigation and related services for safety and

security at sea and protection of the marine environment.”

The ‘how’ and ‘why’ elements of this definition have stood the test of time. However, the leading part of

the definition (the ‘what’) is turning out to be markedly different to that originally envisioned.

This change in focus, over a decade and a half, prompts us to contemplate the future of e-navigation. We

are witnessing some operationalisation of e-navigation, particularly where there are economic, supply chain

or environmental drivers. There are also disruptors and mega trends which appear to be influencing the

future of e-navigation (the ‘what’ part of the definition).

These include new technologies, climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic, cyber risks, and the role of

automation. This presentation will also explore how new information standards relevant to ECDIS and INS

will influence e-navigation in the coming decade

34

Asia-Pacific

The future of e-navigation 4th E-Navigation Underway Asia Pacific Conference

8 and 9 September, 2020

Nick LemonManager, Systems Safety, AMSA

Outline

• e-navigation today – are we on track?

• how it is being implemented

• the future of e-navigation

3534

• E-navigation is now a clichéd, catch-all term, that is losing its impact.

• When the global community embarked on this ambitious project in 2006, the term was

captivating …it was a noble three part definition:

• “the harmonized collection, integration, exchange, presentation and analysis of marine

information on board and ashore by electronic means to enhance berth to berth navigation

and related services for safety and security at sea and protection of the marine

environment.”

E-navigation today

© ATOMOS, 2003

WhatHowWhy

• IMO’s e-navigation Strategy Implementation Plan (SIP) was approved in November 2014 (updated 2018).

• It lists five e-navigation solutions:

1. improved, harmonized and user-friendly bridge design;

2. means for standardized and automated reporting;

3. improved reliability, resilience and integrity of bridge equipment and navigation information;

4. integration and presentation of available information in graphical displays received via communication equipment; and

5. improved Communication of VTS Service Portfolio (not limited to VTS stations).

• It was expected these solutions would be achieved by 2019 and would deliver harmonized information, so products and services could be built to deliver these listed solutions.

E-navigation today

e-Navigation in the future l Mr Nick Lemon

36

Asia-Pacific

Severe economic downturn. Heightened geo-political tensions.

The long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic – uncertain

Our world today

Foresight is not about predicting the future, it is about minimising the surprise.

Shipping will remain the lifeblood of the global economy for the foreseeable future.

Environmentally responsible shipping –pressure to reduce emissions

✓MARPOL – improved protections in response to rising community expectations

✓Low sulphur fuel and alternative means of propulsion

✓Emission Control Areas – ships’ routeing✓Port arrival systems & speed

optimisation ✓Energy efficient design ✓Noise and wake pollution

Shapers and influences

Climate change

More severe weather events –harm to personnel, damage to ships and infrastructure and delays

Technology

DigitalisationBig data, block chain, etcAutomation

3736

• Maritime Connectivity Platform

▪ Two known instances:

▪ Asia Pan-Pacific Web

▪ Navelink (a non-profit consortium, involving the majors of

the marine electronics industry)

▪ Need more instances – and global harmonisation

• Global and technology agnostic concepts for digital collaboration:

▪ Port Collaborative Decision Making (PortCDM). Developed and

validated within the MONALISA and STM Validation projects.

▪ Port Call Optimisation.

▪ Both provide situational awareness among actors to enhance

the efficiency of port operations.

Examples of how

• A decade of transition for electronic navigational charts

• ECDIS or INS?

• The maturing of many S-100 based product specifications:

• S-129 Under Keel Clearance Management

• S-124 Maritime Safety Information

• Port call optimisation S-241

• Several others ….S-200 of IALA is ready for testing

• Learn from the problems experienced with the way ECDIS was introduced

What of the future ?


38

Asia-Pacific

Increasing use of connected systems on board, and ashore.

o Navigation, propulsion and cargo systems on board. Large cruise ships.

o Digital maritime services.

o Ashore - ports, containers, cargoes and VTS.

o Large, distributed and complex systems. More vulnerability.

Attacks - can range from collection of data and malicious activity to

interference with ship operations.

Specific risk is difficult to predict.

Cyber risks

• Trust in autonomous systems?Well designed systems, transparency and accuracy of outputs

• How to deal with boredom and fatigue?Get machines to do what machines are good at…

• Training operators for the age of automation

• Marine Autonomous Surface Ships

Automation

3938

• Australia’s outlook for navigation services

E-navigation today

• The ‘how’ and ‘why’ of e-navigation remain valid, but the ‘what’ is turning out differently – shapers and influencers

• Economically driven, supply chain related developments are happening

• Shaping influences from technology, climate change, COVID-19, cyber risks, role of automation, and

• Enabled by a decade of ECDIS transition

Summary


40

Asia-Pacific


The Future of Maritime Connectivity

Mr R. David Lewald

Aids to Navigation SpecialistOffice of Navigation systems

United States Coast Guard (USCG)

Mr R. David Lewald

Organization: U.S. Coast Guards

Designation: Aids to Navigation Specialist

Nationality: United States of America

Curriculum Vitae

R. David Lewald is a navigation systems and aids to navigation specialist for the U.S. Coast Guard.

He served for 30 years on active duty in the USCG with 25 of those years spent afloat aboard

numerous cutters in all positions including command. He has been a USCG civilian employee

since his retirement in 2014. David’s responsibilities include advisory and consultative services

to USCG programs and managers on a broad range of navigation matters that involve legacy and

future state technology. He serves as an advisor and subject matter expert to the Director of Marine

Transportation Systems on digital and electronic navigation matters and systems, including electronic

chart systems (ECDIS\ECS), automatic identification system (AIS), integrated navigation systems

(INS), integrated bridge systems (IBS), navigation sensors (e.g. Radar, GPS, etc.), and electronic

aids to navigation. David serves as a navigation systems technical expert to standards development

organizations such as International Maritime Organization (IMO), International Hydrographic

Organization (IHO), International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities

(IALA)(Vice Chair of the IALA-ARM Committee), Committee on the Marine Transportation System

(CMTS), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), National Marine Electronics Association

(NMEA), and Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services (RTCM).

Abstract

The future Maritime Connectivity is evolving faster than the Maritime Industry and Competent

Authorities can avail. We know innovations such as Low Earth Orbit satellitesand terrestrial services

such as mobile telecommunications, VDES will expand bandwidth, but how can Governments and

the Maritime Industry keep pace with the rapid advancement?

Answer; Governments should continue to build data distribution infrastructure agnostic to

communication services and the Maritime Industry should look to investing in robustsystems that

can grow as new data becomes available.

44

Asia-Pacific

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD –OFFICE OF NAVIGATION SYSTEMS

“The Future of Maritime Connectivity”IALA e-Navigation Underway

Asia-Pacific 2020

R. David Lewald| Program Analyst – Navigation SystemsOffice of Navigation Systems | U.S. Coast Guard | Washington, DC

The Challenge:The future of maritime connectivity is evolving faster than the maritime industry and Competent Authorities (Governments) can avail

4544

The Future of Maritime Connectivity l Mr R. David Lewald

– We know innovations such as Low Earth Orbit satellites and terrestrial services such as mobile telecommunications, VDES, etc. will expand bandwidth, but how can Governments and the Maritime Industry keep pace with the rapid advancement?Example:Look at how quickly Conferencing software and applications were introduced and adapted to COVID social distancing guidelines and travel restrictions. Who would have imagined this scenarios 1 year ago?

Solution:Governments should continue to build data distribution infrastructure agnostic to communication services and the Maritime Industry should look to investing in robust systems or services that can grow as new communications technology and data become available

Example to be reviewed:Maintenance of Marine Safety Information supplied by a contracted service provider to vessels at sea

46

Asia-Pacific

Sample of an Electronic Charting System manufacture’s Electronic Navigational Chart support services

class Domain Ov erv iew - Print

This data model is an S-100 representation of a subset of the S-57 3.1 supplement 3 datamodel with the exception to AIS AtoN modeling which is derived from S-101. The model focus is aids to navigation.

«FeatureType»AidsToNavigation

+ AtoNMaintenanceRecord: URI [0..1]+ AtoNNumber: URN+ dateEnd: S100_TruncatedDate [0..1]+ dateStart: S100_TruncatedDate [0..1]+ idCode: URN+ information: text [0..*]+ informationInNationalLanguage: text [0..*]+ inspectionFrequency: text [0..1]+ inspectionRequirements: text [0..1]+ installationDate: S100_TruncatedDate [0..1]+ periodEnd: S100_TruncatedDate [0..1]+ periodStart: S100_TruncatedDate [0..1]+ pictorialRepresentation: text [0..1]+ ScaleMinimum: int [0..1]+ sourceDate: dateTime [0..1]+ sourceIndication: text [0..1]+ textualDescription: text [0..1]+ textualDescriptionInNationalLanguage: text [0..1]

«FeatureType»Equipment

+ remotelyMonitored: boolean [0..1]+ remoteMonitoringSystem: text [0..*]

constraints{Can only have point geometry}

«FeatureType»Daymark

+ categoryOfSpecialPurposeMark: categoryOfSpecialPurposeMark [0..1]+ colour: colour [1..*] {sequence}+ colourPattern: colourPattern [0..*]+ elevation: real [0..1]+ height: real [0..1]+ natureOfConstruction: natureOfConstruction [0..*]+ objectName: text [0..1]+ objectNameInNationalLanguage: text [0..1]+ status: status [0..*]+ topmarkDaymarkShape: topmarkDaymarkShape+ verticalAccuracy: real [0..1]+ verticalDatum: verticalDatum [0..1]+ verticalLength: real [0..1]

Daymark can be structureor equipment object as per S-57 UOC. TBD is IALA wish to retain same rule.

«FeatureType»Nav igationLine

+ categoryOfNavigationLine: categoryOfNavigationLine+ orientation: real+ status: status [0..*]

constraints{Can only have line geometry}

«FeatureType»RecommendedTrack

+ categoryOfRecommendedTrack : categoryOfRecommendedTrack [0..1]+ depthRangeMaximumValue: real [0..1]+ depthRangeMinimumValue: real [0..1]+ objectName: text [0..1]+ objectNameInNationalLanguage: text [0..1]+ orientation: real+ qualityOfSoundingMeasurement: qualityOfSoundingMeasurement [0..*]+ soundingAccuracy: real [0..1]+ status: status [0..*]+ techniqueOfSoundingMeasurement: techniqueOfSoundingMeasurement [0..*]+ trafficFlow: trafficFlow+ verticalDatum: verticalDatum [0..1]

constraints{Can only have line geometry}

«FeatureType»StructureObject

+ aidAvailabilityCategory: aidAvailabilityCategory

«FeatureType»Aggregation

+ categoryOfAggregation: categoryOfAggregation+ idCode: text+ objectName: text [0..1]+ objectNameInNationalLanguage: text [0..1]

«FeatureType»Association

+ categoryOfAssociation: categoryOfAssociation+ idCode: text+ objectName: text [0..1]+ objectNameInNationalLanguage: text [0..1]

«FeatureType»GenericBeacon

+ beaconShape: beaconShape+ colour: colour [1..*] {sequence}+ colourPattern: colourPattern [0..*]+ condition: condition [0..1]+ elevation: real [0..1]+ height: real [0..1]+ marksNavigationalSystemOf: marksNavigationalSystemOf [0..1]+ natureOfConstruction: natureOfConstruction [0..*]+ objectName: text [0..1]+ objectNameInNationalLanguage: text [0..1]+ radarConspicuous: radarConspicuous [0..1]+ status: status [0..*]+ verticalAccuracy: real [0..1]+ verticalLength: real [0..1]+ visuallyConspicuous: visuallyConspicuous [0..1]


«FeatureType»GenericBuoy

+ buoyShape: buoyShape+ colour: colour [1..*] {sequence}+ colourPattern: colourPattern [0..*]+ marksNavigationalSystemOf: marksNavigationalSystemOf [0..1]+ natureOfconstuction: natureOfConstruction [0..*]+ objectName: text [0..1]+ objectNameInNationalLanguage: text [0..1]+ radarConspicious: radarConspicuous [0..1]+ status: status [0..*]+ typeOfBuoy: text [0..1]+ verticalAccuracy: real [0..1]+ verticalLength: real [0..1]


«S100_CodeList»categoryOfAggregation

+ leading line+ measured distance+ range system

tagscodelistType = open enumerationencoding = other: [something]

«S100_CodeList»categoryOfAssociation

+ channel markings+ danger markings

tagscodelistType = open enumerationencoding = other: [something]

Geometry

+ geometry+ GM_CompositeCurve+ GM_Point+ GM_Surface

«FeatureType»BuoyLateral

+ categoryOfLateralMark: categoryOfLateralMark

«FeatureType»BeaconLateral

+ categoryOfLateralMark: categoryOfLateralMark

also other subtypes of Equipment:LightFogSignaletc., etc., - see diagram for Equipment objects

And other beacon feature types...see diagram for Structure objects.

And other buoy feature types...See diagram for Structure objects.

«FeatureType»VirtualAISAidToNav igation

+ estimatedRangeOfTransmission: real [0..1]+ MMSICode: int [0..1]+ objectName: text [0..1]+ objectNameInNationalLanguage: text [0..1]+ status: status [0..1]+ virtualAISAidToNavigationType: virtualAISAidToNavigationType


«FeatureType»SynteticAISAidToNav igation

+ categoryOfSynteticAISAidToNavigation: categoryOfSynteticAISAidToNavigation+ estimatedRangeOfTransmission: real+ MMSICode: int [0..1]+ objectName: text+ objectNameInNationalLanguage: text+ status: status


+navigableTrack

0..*

Ra

ng

eS

yste

m

+navigationLine 1..*

+peer

0..*

Associations +peer

0..*

+parent

StructureEquipment

+child

0..*

+peer

0..*

Aggregations +peer

0..*

S-201 ATON Data Model

4746

The Future of Maritime Connectivity l Mr R. David Lewald

ATON Data – U.S. Western Rivers

No. TitleWorking Group / Project Team/Committee

No TitleWorking Group / Project Team/Committee

S-101Electronic Navigational Chart

S-100WG/S-101PT S-201Aids to Navigation Information

ARM

S-102Bathymetric Surface

S-100WG S-210Inter-VTS Exchange Format

VTS

S-103Sub-surface Navigation

TWCWG S-211 Port Call Messages IPCDMC

S-104Tidal Info for Surface Nav

TWCWG S-212VTS digital information service

VTS

S-111 Surface Currents TWCWG S-230Application Specific Messages

ENAV/ARM

S-112Dynamic Water Level Data

TWCWG S-240DGNSS Station Almanac

ENG

S-121Maritime Limits & Boundaries

NIPWG S-245DGNSS Station Almanac

ENG

S-122Marine Protected Areas

NIPWG S-246eLoran Station Almanac

ENG

S-123 Radio Services NIPWG

S-124Navigational Warnings

NIPWG S-401Inland Electronic Navigational Chart

IEHG

S-125Navigational Services

NIPWG/ARM

S-126Physical Environment

NIPWG S-411 Ice Information WMO

S-127Traffic Management

NIPWG S-412 Weather Overlay WMO

S-128Catalogues of Naut Products

NIPWG

S-1xx Marine Services NIPWG S-421 Route Exchange IEC

S-10xUnder Keel Clearance

S-100/UKCMPT

Index of S-100 Based Product Specifications

48

Asia-Pacific

The Strategic Benefits of Product Specification development:

- Does not require Governments to establish and maintain dedicated communication link(s) which have ever shrinking services lives and are rapidly superseded by advancements in technology

- Provides flexibility to the Maritime Industry to pursue communication technologies and services suitable to their fleet needs and trade routes

QUESTIONS?

smart-navigation projectdesignation: general project manager nationality: republic of korea...

Documents