Ron SegaWoodward Professor of Systems Engineering

Colorado State University (CSU)Vice President for Energy, Environment and Applied Research

Colorado State Research Foundation (CSURF)

Smart Secure Grid

Workshop

Smart Secure Grid Workshop - Agenda

Part I (March 10)Introduction / BackgroundWork in ProgressTour

Part II (March 11)SecurityCurrent Plans / OpportunitiesRegional Coordination – A National Model?

2

Introduction / BackgroundWelcome / Background / Issues (Sega) 1:00-1:30 (30 min)Rocky Mountain Smart Grid Initiative Concept Intro. (Harrell) 1:30-2:00 (30 min)American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Farland) 2:00-2:15 (15 min)Break 2:15-2:30 (15 min)

Work in Progress (Colorado examples)Collaboratory (Hiller) 2:30-2:45 (15 min)FortZED (Sumner) 2:45-3:00 (15 min)Xcel Energy SmartGridCity 3:00-3:15 (15 min)Utilities Discussion / WECC (Greenlaw) 3:15-3:30 (15 min)

TourIntegrid Background / Denmark Project (Harrell) 3:30-3:45 (15 min)Travel to Engines and Energy Conversion Lab (EECL) 3:45-4:00 (15 min)Integrid Tour / SCADA Simulation (EECL) 4:00-5:00 (1 hour)

3

Smart Secure Grid Workshop - Part I Agenda

4

Introduction and Recap of Part I (Sega) 8:00-8:20 (20 min)

SecurityDepartment of Homeland Security (Pugh) 8:20-8:40 (20 min)Department of Defense 8:40-9:30 (50 min)

Break 9:30-9:50 (20 min)

Current Plans / OpportunitiesDepartment of Energy / National Labs (Waugaman) 9:50-10:20 (30 min)Installation Discussion (Bratlien) 10:20-11:00 (40 min)

Regional Coordination – A National Model?Experiments / Demonstrations / Exercises 11:00-11:45 (45 min)Wrap-Up / Next Steps 11:45-12:00 (15 min)

Workshop Concludes

Optional / Make-up Integrid Tour (EECL) 1:00-2:00 (1 hour)

Smart Secure Grid Workshop - Part II Agenda

10

Director of Defense Research and Engineering, Department of Defense

Three areas of Increased EmphasisNational Aerospace InitiativeSurveillance and Knowledge SystemsEnergy and Power Technologies

Technical Systems ReviewsTechnology Readiness AssessmentsTask Force support to Systems Development

Workforce InitiativeDUSD (Laboratories and Basic Sciences)National Defense Education Program (NDEP)

11

FY02 FY12

Power Needs

Energy & Power Technologies…- Enabling a More Electric Force

POWERGENERATION

• Fuel Cells & Fuel Reforming

• Novel Power

ENERGY STORAGE

• Batteries• Capacitors

POWER CONTROLAND DISTRIBUTION

• Switching & Conditioning

• Power Transmission & Distribution

• Thermal Management

FUEL CELL

New Operational New Operational CapabilitiesCapabilities

Electric Warship

Warrior

High Power Microwave

Space Based Radar

Hybrid/Electric Combat Vehicle

Electric/Hybrid Weapons

More Electric Aircraft

12

Under Secretary of the Air Force

SpaceDepartment of Defense Executive Agent for SpaceBack to Basics in Acquisition and the Block Approach

Systems EngineeringWorkforce

Research and Development Alignment with Needs and Redistribution of RiskStability in Basic Research

Energy“Make Energy a Consideration in All We Do”Energy Strategy (Supply and Demand – with Metrics)

13

AF Energy Strategy - Addressing Supply & Demand

“Make Energy a Consideration in All We Do”

Accelerate development and use of “Alternative” sourcesSynthetic Fuel for AviationRenewable Energy for Installations

Enhance energy efficiency -- aviation and infrastructurePromote a culture where Airmen conserve energy

14

Examples of Air Force Energy Initiatives in the United States

Center of ExcellenceDemonstration Sites

Fuel Cell/Electric Warehouse TractorSelfridge ANGB, MI

Low Speed Vehicles Shaw AFB, SC

Advanced Power Technology Office, Robins AFB, GA

Demonstrate H2 Production & Military Fuel Cell VehicleGrand Forks AFB, ND

Synthetic Fuels Research, Air Force Research Lab, WPAFB, OH

Air Force Energy Office, Tyndall AFB, FL

Wind generation farm, FE Warren AFB, WY

14MW Photovoltaic generation, Nellis AFB, NV

B-52 SynFuel Flight Demo, Edwards AFB, CA

Waste energy and ice plant, Dyess AFB, TX

122 KW Photovoltaic project, Luke AFB, AZ

15

B-52 Initial Flight Test of Synthetic Fuel/JP-8 Blend - Flight Crew (September 19, 2006)

16

AF Energy Strategy - Senior Focus Group

Coordinated and developed various programs to improve supplyand demand aspects of energy -- Established goals and metrics to manage progress.

Improved efficiency in aviation and infrastructure operations and invested in more energy efficient future systems.

Infrastructure: Energy Savings / Cost Avoidance – 100,000 homesAviation: 9% reduction in flying hours, 7% reduction in jet fuel used

Encouraged use of alternative sources of energy for infrastructure and aviation applications(AF uses approx. 2.5 billion gallons of fuel annually)

Infrastructure: Was the nation’s largest single purchaser of renewable energy in FY05 (approx. one million megawatt-hours in FY05 and FY06)Aviation: Supported synthetic fuel activities (currently exploring biofuel) --First B-52 test fight of a 50/50 blend of synthetic fuel and JP-8 in September 2006 – certified in August 2007

17

Organizational Awards Received by the Air Force (2005-2007)

Green Power Partner of the Year Award -- Department of Energy (DOE) / Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA)

Climate Protection Award -- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Stratospheric Ozone Protection Award-- United Nations Environmental Programme and

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Presidential Award for Leadership in Federal Energy Management

-- To U.S. Air Force Energy Strategy Senior Focus Group

Systems Engineering

Trend toward increasing complexity of systemsAerospace, Energy, Environment, etc.

Needs of industry and governmentNational SurveysRecent Colorado Industry and Government Survey

Systems engineering education at CSUMaster of Engineering in Systems Engineering began last FallFuture graduate degrees to emphasize energy systems

18

Distribution / Controls Technologies

Engines and Energy Conversion Lab

19

Institute for 21st Century Energy - Blueprint Roll-Out Event September 2008

The Institute for 21st Century Energy - An Open Letter to the 44th President of the United States and the 111th U.S. Congress

21

The Institute’s Blueprint Rollout Event - September 30, 2008 in Fort Collins, Colorado

22

General James L. Jones, USMC (Ret.),President and CEO, Institute for 21st

Century Energy, U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Wayne Allard, U.S. Senator (R-CO)

Renny Fagan, State Director, Office of U.S.Senator Ken Salazar (D-CO)

Robert McGrath, Deputy Laboratory Director for Science and Technology, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Thomas Gendron, Chairman, CEO andPresident, Woodward

Ron Bills, CEO and Chairman, EnvirofitInternational

Doug Henston, CEO, Solix Biofuels, Inc.

Ron Sega, Woodward Professor of SystemsEngineering (CSU), and Vice President of Energy, Environment and Applied Research (CSURF)

Above: Gen. James Jones and Dr. Ron Sega

U.S. Chamber's Energy Institute Releases Blueprint for Securing America's Energy Future*

FORT COLLINS, CO - General James L. Jones, USMC (Ret.), president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Institute for 21st Century Energy, today unveiled a comprehensive blueprint for securing America's energy future at Colorado State University (CSU). With more than 75 policy recommendations, the blueprint is a thorough and compelling framework for the next president and Congress to adopt as a balanced and comprehensive energy strategy.

Following a tour of CSU's Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory, General Jones joined U.S. Senator Wayne Allard and CSU Vice President of Energy, the Environment, and Applied Research Ron Sega to deliver remarks to students, faculty, and regional business leaders.

"With a challenge this great and urgent, we must encourage new partnerships, like those taking place in Colorado, that bring together the best of government, industry, and academia to create cutting-edge technology solutions to our long-term challenges," Gen. Jones said. "The blueprint's 75 policy recommendations for America's forthcoming political leadership aim to transform energy challenges into energy opportunities; unleash the power of America's vast resources and innovation, and generate new supplies, new technologies, and new American jobs."

23

*http://www.energyxxi.org/xxi/newsroom/pr_080930.htm

U.S. Chamber's Energy Institute - Critical Challenges

1. Promoting greater energy efficiency

2. Increasing and diversifying our energy supplies

3. Improving environmental stewardship

4. Modernizing and protecting our nation’s energy infrastructure

24

“Significant portions of our energy and transportation infrastructure are inadequate and, in some cases, in decline. Whether it is a new wind farm or transmission lines that carry generated electricity to homes and businesses, investments are needed to modernize, protect, and upgrade these critical assets.Transitioning to smart grid technology will help improve the resiliency and efficiency of our power supply and must be a priority….” (Blueprint, p.5)

“…government should support where it can the clustering of energy research and development activities that speeds knowledgeexchange, improves productivity and wages, and fosters regional economic development.” (Brookings, p.25)

Background and Need

“In this context, the needed process of innovation in energy technology must be understood as not consisting only of research and development (R&D), but also of at least equal emphasis and resources devoted to demonstration at commercial scale and in diverse contexts of the technological improvements that R&D have made possible and to mechanisms to promote accelerated deployment of those demonstrated options that offer the greatest leverage for reducing important externalities and enhancing important public goods.” (Holdren, p.19)

“Military installations are almost completely dependent on a fragile and vulnerable commercial power grid, placing critical military and Homeland defense missions at unacceptable risk of extended outage.” (DSB, p.5)

“The Task Force recommends DoD pursue the concept of “islanding,”which would isolate critical loads, and selectively entire installations, from the grid and make them self-sufficient. A combination of much higher end-use efficiency coupled with alternative power supply sources would move the Department in this direction.” (DSB, p.59)

Background and Need (cont’d)

27

Concluding Thoughts

“We owe our current prosperity, security, and good health to the investments of past generations, and we are obliged to renew those commitments in education, research, and innovation policies to ensure that the American people continue to benefit from the remarkable opportunities provided by the rapid development of the global economy and it’s not inconsiderable underpinning in science and technology.”

Reference: Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, National Academy of Sciences, 2005

Backup

Overview

BackgroundDirector of Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E)

Investments in Energy and Power TechnologiesUnder Secretary of the Air Force

Energy Strategy and Implementation (Supply, Demand, Culture)

Sample Initiatives -- Colorado State University (CSU) Energy and Environmental Leadership

Education, Innovation, Supply, Demand, ManagementSystems Approach to Energy and the Environment

29

Colorado Renewable Energy Collaboratory

A research collaboration of:National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Colorado School of Mines

Colorado State University

University of Colorado at Boulder

The Collaboratory works with public and private partners to:

Create and commercialize renewable energy technologies

Build a clean, sustainable renewable energy economy for Colorado, the region, the nation and the world

Educate future scientists and engineers and train the renewable energy workforce.

30

1. EducationCommunityWorkforce

2. StorageBatteriesFly wheelsPumped Hydro

3. Transmission & DistributionSmart GridFortZEDBoulder Smart Grid City

4. Efficiency & ConversionBuilding Materials & SystemsSolar DecathlonEngines

5. SecurityRobust and Reliable

31

NREL

CU

CSU

CSM

Private Sector

Col

labo

rato

ry: E

ffici

ency

Center of Excellence: Energy Efficiency and Management

32

Increasing the students’ Awareness of Energy and the Environment

Extending “CSU Extension Service” to Include Energy and the Environment

Increasing Workforce Development EffortsNew School of Global Environmental Sustainability

Student Involvement in Research (e.g. Engines and Energy Conversion Lab)

New Degree Programs (e.g. Master of Engineering in Systems Engineering)

Education

33

CSU Extension Districts

Master of Engineering in Systems Engineering

34

Customer-driven programGreat survey responseWorking professional focusBegan Fall 2008

Engr 501: Foundations of Systems Engineering

Flexible delivery modes (in-class, out-of-class, synchronous and/or asynchronous)National experts present case studies

M.S. and Ph.D. in Systems Engineering - Energy Systems Emphasis

In the planning stages of developmentComplimentary to the new School of Global Environmental SustainabilityOptimizing alignment with:

Faculty interestsGlobal trends/needsClean Energy Supercluster strengths in “Energy Systems”Collaboratory “Energy Systems” strengthsGovernment InterestsIndustry partner interests

35

Land Grant Institution -- Clean Energy emphasis

Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory (EECL):Two-Cycle Engine and Cookstoves (Envirofit)

Distribution / Controls Technologies (Spirae)

Algae-Derived Transportation Fuels (Solix)

The 2008 Royal Award for Sustainable Technology Transfer, protected by HRH Crown Prince Felipe of Spain and HRH Crown Prince Frederik of Denmark, was presented to CSU for clean tech innovations in three different areas: an international clean cookstove project, two-stroke engine conversion kit and the next generation of biofuels production from algae.

Innovation- Research and Transition to the Marketplace

36

Two-Cycle Engine and Cookstoves

Engines and Energy Conversion Lab

37

Algae-Derived Transportation Fuels

Engines and Energy Conversion Lab

38

Integration of Energy and Environment Activities at “CSU”

Energy and the EnvironmentSchool of Global Environmental SustainabilitySystems Engineering – Energy Systems emphasis

Master of Engineering in Systems Engineering – Began Fall 2008M.S. and Ph.D. to begin Fall 2010 – 4 Faculty lines (Power Engr, etc.)

Clean Energy Supercluster – “Center of Excellence”CenergyEnvironment and Sustainability CommitteePresidents’ Commitment (CSU – Carbon Neutral by 2020)

CSU StructuresSuperclusters to Centers of Excellence?CSURF – Apllied Research Institute?

39

40

Four-stage processSystem ProductionSystems DevelopmentTechnology DevelopmentScience & Technology

Reapportion RiskLower risk in Production

Use mature technologyHigher risk in S&T

XSS-11XSS-11

STP-R1 Streak

GPS-IIR-M

TSAT

Back to Basics in Acquisition

Examples:

41

Acquisition Stages—Block Approach - GPS III Example

Block 2

Block 2

SystemsDevelopment

SystemProduction

Block 1

Block 4

Block 4

Block 4

Block 4

Block 3

Block 3

TechnologyDevelopment

Block 3

Block 6

Block 6

Block 5

Block 5

Block 5 Block 7

IIIA IIIB IIIC

Cross Links

Spot Beam

ClocksScience &Technology

Colorado as an Energy Microcosm of the U.S.

Colorado has significant energy resources and has several energy initiatives under way

Application of a Systems Approach to Energy and the Environment

Work in progress on a systems-oriented approach complementing current activities – supporting a sustainable energy economy.

EducationStorageTransmissionEfficiencySecurity

42

43

NREL Renewable Energy Communities: designing new communities using a renewable energy systems approach—with sustainable planning, net zero-energy homes, advanced vehicles, and innovative utility interconnections—to decrease energy use, emissions and climate change impacts

DOE Solar America City, Denver: a select group of U.S. cities working to accelerate the adoption of solar energy technologies for a cleaner, more secure energy future

Xcel SmartGridCity, Boulder: utilizing a next-generation electrical grid to create the first fully integrated "smart" city in the nation

FortZED: Fort Collins Zero Energy District

Current Activities

“FortZED” – Zero Energy District

44

“Research, Development and Demonstration of a Coordinated and Integrated System of 3.5 MW of Mixed Distributed Resources in Fort Collins, Colorado, to Achieve a 20-30% Peak Load Reduction of Multiple Distribution Feeders” – DoE funded proposal ($6.5M + $5M)

Modernize and transform the electrical distribution system

Improved efficiency and reliability

Demonstration includes aggregation of distributed energy resources (DER) from approximately 5 participant locations

Duration: May 2008 – April 2010

Energy Efficiency and Management - Summary

A systems approach to energy efficiency andmanagement can have significant impact in the clean and renewable energy technology space.

Underlying information and control technologies become the enablers for solutions for unlocking new value propositions for energy supply and demand.

Colorado can serve as a microcosm for U.S. and potentially beyond in demonstrating energy and environment systems solutions.

45

Consistent with CSU’s Mission as a Land Grant Institution

Leadership in our Community, Region, and Nation

Areas of Energy and Environmental Focus:- Education- Innovation- Supply- Demand- Management

CSU Leadership in Energy and the Environment

Always Consider Energy, Environment and the Community

46

47

Mission:Seek solutions to pressing environmental challenges that are regionally relevant and globally significant

Catalyze through a cross-college infrastructure, the University’s strength in environmental research and education

Sustainable Development and Strategic Networks:Partnerships and Linkages Nationally and Globally

Partnerships with Business and Research

Coordination of Student Environmental Networks

Incorporating Industry Demands into Curriculum Development

New School of Global Environmental Sustainability

48

Principal Findings:

1.Power Grid as a Target.

2.Risk.

3.Resilience, Restoration, &Recovery.

4.Vulnerability to Multi-point Attacks.

5.Distributed Energy Generation.

6.Barriers to Mitigation.

7.R&D.

Principal Recommendations:

1.Resilience, Restoration, &Recovery.

2.Analysis, Simulation, and Modeling.

3.Red Team Activities.

Power Grid SecurityJASON Preliminary Report – September 28, 2008

A Proposed Coordinated Approach for Regional Smart Grid Deployment

Ron SegaWoodward Professor of Systems Engineering

Colorado State University (CSU)

Vice President for Energy, Environment and Applied Research

DoE, City of Fort Collins – FortZED Demonstration

Fort Carson – Solar

Peterson – Vehicles

F.E. Warren – Wind

Air Force Academy – Solar

Fort Irwin – Geothermal

Air Force Space Command – Cybersecurity

UCCS – Cybersecurity

CSU / Spirae – Integrid Lab

PRPA

NORTHCOM

Ongoing Activities

Develop and Establish a Common, Integrated, Secure Smart Grid Architecture Utilizing Existing Resources at Participating Installations

Architecture Characteristics:

Consumer Control

Resilience

Allow Use of Distributed, Renewable Energy Sources

CO, UT, WY, NM Region, Including Military Bases

Provide Enabling Architecture for Future Smart Grids

A Proposed Coordinated Approach

Secure Smart Grid Architecture to be Tested in a Live Exercise

Plan Includes Test Points for:Consumer Control

Resilience

Effective Use of Distributed Energy Resources

Way Ahead for a Regional Test

?

Next Steps / Action Plan