smoke taint removal

17
Smoke Taint Removal Via Reverse Osmosis

Upload: braith

Post on 31-Jan-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Smoke Taint Removal. Via Reverse Osmosis. Start of Smoke Taint. In June and July 2008 - 54,817 acres were destroyed throughout Mendocino County. Fire burned for weeks without containment. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Smoke Taint Removal

Smoke Taint Removal

Via Reverse Osmosis

Page 2: Smoke Taint Removal

Start of Smoke Taint

• In June and July 2008 - 54,817 acres were destroyed throughout Mendocino County.

• Fire burned for weeks without containment.

• Dense smoke & poor visibility throughout Mendocino, Lake and Northern Sonoma Counties, including some areas of Napa County

Page 3: Smoke Taint Removal

Management Options

• Unfortunately…… very little information is available• Some or lots of anecdotal information is available

• Customer did various trials with other vendors and chose Winesecrets based on Service and Experience

British Columbia Fire in 2003

Page 4: Smoke Taint Removal

Customer Case Study

• Customer experimented with press fractions and Processed all affected white grapes with the following regime

• White Wine Free Run - free of smoke taint: – 135 Gallons / Ton

– Resulting in large amount of press wine to be processed

Page 5: Smoke Taint Removal

Red wine • Obviously More Difficult

• Eliminating Skin Contact Not an Option

• Containment– Separating press fractions and delay blending

• Keep known smoke free lots separate• Wait post ML to evaluate for treatment

Page 6: Smoke Taint Removal

Dealing with press fractions

• Ultra filtration of press wine:Experimented with 10k (MWCO)

10k:• Removed color and harsh phenolics retained

varietal character• Created neutral but very useable wine

Press fraction ready for RO treatment Up to 2 passes or less!!!

Page 7: Smoke Taint Removal

Ultra Filtration for Press FractionsUltra Filtration for Press Fractions

Page 8: Smoke Taint Removal

Molecular Wight cut-off range

• Crossflow Clarification 200,000 - 500,000• Ultrafiltration 1,000 - 200,000• Tannin & Browning 10,000 - 200,000• Protein Removal 10,000 - 40,000• Decolorization 1,000 - 5,000• Nanofiltration *** 500 - 1,000• Loose Reverse Osmosis 200 - 400• Reverse Osmosis 100 - 200

• *** Not allowed by TTB

Page 9: Smoke Taint Removal

Low Pressure Reverse Osmosis Membrane

Page 10: Smoke Taint Removal
Page 11: Smoke Taint Removal

Red Wine RO Treatment

• Wine should be clean < 50 NTU – XF Filtration?• Processed prior to barrel aging• Red vs. White ……It’s a slower Process!!

– Most challenging lots were red wines– Worst case: 10 passes on RO

• Tasted at least daily/more on smaller lots– Treated enough to remove taint– Didn’t over treat, risk stripping wine

Page 12: Smoke Taint Removal

Empowering the CustomerOur pride & specialty !

• After the initial Start –up face and completion of UF work we trained our customer to run our equipment.

• This lead to reduced cost per Gallon and more freedom in scheduling

• Winesecrets trained cellar staff and managed integration of the technology into cellar production

Page 13: Smoke Taint Removal

Challenges when tasting your wines

• Smoke characteristics carry over to next sample• Difficult to distinguish sample to sample – need a break• Slow to pick up “Post Nasal” - ST can show up 30 sec –

1 min. after tasting• Use a good control – 2006/07• Taste in the morning…. If you can

Page 14: Smoke Taint Removal

Wine Analysis

Smoke Taint Markers Wine Before Removal Permeate Before Carbon Permeate After Carbon Wine After Removal Guaiacol 14 ug/L 6ug/L <1ug/L 1 ug/L4-Methylguaiacol 8 ug/L 3ug/L <1ug/L 3 ug/L4-Ethylphenol <1 ug/L <1ug/L <1ug/L <1 ug/L4-Ethylguaiacol 2 ug/L <1ug/L <1ug/L 3 ug/LAlcohol 13.74 %V/V 12.82%V/V 12.95%V/V 13.81 %V/VpH 3.44 3.16 3.17 3.44OAP Wine Panel Completed Completed Completed CompletedCitric Acid None Detected None Detected None Detected None DetectedTartaric Acid 0.254 g/100mL 0.015g/100mL 0.014g/100mL 0.245 g/100mLMalic Acid 0.009 g/100mL None Detected None Detected 0.009 g/100mLLactic Acid 0.145 g/100mL 0.086g/100mL 0.075g/100mL 0.150 g/100mLAcetic Acid 0.047g/100mL 0.020g/100mL 0.021g/100mL 0.044g/100mLSuccinic Acid 0.082 g/100mL 0.055g/100mL 0.047g/100mL 0.080 g/100mLOrganic Acid Pro 0.537 g/100mL 0.198g/100mL 0.186g/100mL 0.519 g/100mL

Merlot

Page 15: Smoke Taint Removal

Permeate / Carbon Filter Blind Tasting

MERLOT 2008Phenol Analysis

12-Mar 13-Mar 14-Mar 16-MarBefore After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After

CONTROL 1.599 1.074 1.501 1.52 1.869 1.581 1.946 1.65 1.508AF 1.675 0.724 0.023 0.016 0.038 1.326 0.051 0.102 0.705CC 1.673 0.038 0.038 0.186 0.869 0.973 0.031 1.496 2.48

Blind Tasting 6-Mar We tasted before and after samples from different filter's brands

Group GroupWine ID BB JC MC Z Score RankAF-AF 1 1 3 1 6 1CC-BF 6 6 6 6 24 6 AF Carbon Filter 1R-BF 5 4 5 5 19 5 CC Carbon Filter 2CC-AF 3 3 2 3 11 3 R ResinR-AF 2 2 1 2 7 2AF-BF 4 5 4 4 17 4

BF / BeforeAF / After

9-Mar

Scoring

5-Mar 6-Mar 7-Mar

Page 16: Smoke Taint Removal

Wine Samples (tasting)

DNV Wine 1

Guaiacol 13 ug/L

AFT Guaiacol 10 ug/L

DWB Wine 2

Guaiacol 12 ug/L

AFT Guaiacol 3 ug/L

Page 17: Smoke Taint Removal

Final conclusion regarding Smoke and Mirrors

• Since 2003 we have treated so far over 1.5 Mil gallons of wine

• Smoke taint removal works just fine • No re-occurrence…. Not on processed wine or in the

vineyards• All vendors use RO based membrane technology• Pressure vary from 250psi to 600/700psi – depending on

wine• Filter media is the key difference next to customer

Service (wrong media = negative effects/stripping)