smoothing payout in volatile financial times 1 march 14, 2013

14
Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

Upload: jerome-reynard-burke

Post on 05-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times

1

March 14, 2013

Page 2: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

Our Mission

2

The California Endowment's mission is to expand access to affordable, quality health care for underserved individuals and communities, and to promote fundamental improvements in the health status of all Californians.

Page 3: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

Spending Considerations

3

• Multi-generational long-term mission• Perpetual endowment: 5% spend

However…• Willing to spend >5% when needs dictate

Page 4: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

History of Spending Policies

4

2000 – No Clear Policy – Principled Approach

2007 – Fixed

2011 – Weighted Average

Page 5: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

TIME

SPENDING

A2 D A B C

• Curved Line represents 5% of Corpus• Straight Line represents actual spending plan• Below the Line generate carryovers• Above the Line use carryovers

A – Recession ending

B – Expansion phase slows

C – Growth slows below

D - Beginning of recession

2007 – A Fixed Approach to Spending

Source: TCE Presentation to Board San Francisco 11/20/06

Page 6: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

6

Page 7: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

7

Page 8: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

2011 – Spending Policy Review

8

• Hired Angeles Advisors • Benchmarked vs Other Foundations• Three Most Common:• Moving Average• Fixed/Banded Inflation• Hybrid/Yale

• Monte Carlo Simulation 10 Years

Page 9: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

9Source: Angeles Advisors March 2011

Page 10: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

Why Historical Average?

10

• Most Common

• Easy to Explain/Defend/Understand

• Most Downside Protection

• Adequate Smoothing of Payout

Page 11: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

11

Page 12: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

Spending Policy – Related Considerations

12

• Overspend Still Allowed for Special Opportunities

• Perpetuity and Spending Policies Revisited Periodically

• Best Case/Worst Case Scenario Planning

Page 13: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

Appendix

13

Page 14: Smoothing Payout in Volatile Financial Times 1 March 14, 2013

“Perpetuity – With a Caveat”

14

“Spending Level for a given fiscal year is determined at 5.0%* of the 3-year moving average value of TCE’s non-charitable use assets.”*However, the board affirmed a commitment to overspend this level, even aggressively, should a momentous opportunity to advance our mission arise.

Source: From TCE Spending Policy April 2012