snowcreek viii, snowcreek master plan update - 2007 …
TRANSCRIPT
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
SNOWCREEK VIII, SNOWCREEK MASTER PLAN UPDATE - 2007
PROJECT
Lead Agency: Town of Mammoth Lakes
Community Development Department PO Box 1609
Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546
SCH # 2006112015 August 2007
SNOWCREEK VIII, SNOWCREEK MASTER PLAN UPDATE - 2007
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Submitted to:
Town of Mammoth Lakes Community Development Department
PO Box 1609 Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546
Attn: Bill Taylor Deputy Community Development Director
Submitted by:
In association with:
SWCA Environmental Consultants Treadwell & Rollo
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.
August 2007
This document is prepared on paper with 30% recycled content.
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 Table of Contents Draft Environmental Impact Report Page i SCH # 2006112015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ I-1 A. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. I-1 B. PURPOSE OF THE EIR ....................................................................................................... I-1 C. PROPOSED PROJECT......................................................................................................... I-2 D. AREAS OF KNOWN CONTROVERSY/ISSUES ............................................................. I-3 E. ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................ I-4 F. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES ........ I-5
II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING....................................................................................................... II-1
A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... II-1 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS.................................................................................................. II-1 C. RELATED PROJECTS...................................................................................................... II-23
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................................III-1
A. PROJECT APPLICANT .....................................................................................................III-1 B. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS ......................................................................................III-1 C. PROJECT OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................III-43 D. DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS ........................................................................................III-46
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS ............................................................................. IV.A-1
A. IMPACTS FOUND TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT.......................................... IV.A-1 B. AESTHETICS .................................................................................................................IV.B-1 C. AIR QUALITY................................................................................................................IV.C-1 D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................... IV.D-1 E. CULTURAL RESOURCES ...........................................................................................IV.E-1 F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS................................................................................................ IV.F-1 G. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .................................................................. IV.G-1 H. LAND USE AND PLANNING..................................................................................... IV.H-1 I. NOISE............................................................................................................................... IV.I-1 J. POPULATION AND HOUSING ...................................................................................IV.J-1 K. PUBLIC SERVICES ..................................................................................................... IV.K-1 L. RECREATION................................................................................................................IV.L-1
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 Table of Contents Draft Environmental Impact Report Page ii SCH # 2006112015
M. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ........................................................................IV.M-1 N. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ..................................................................... IV.N-1
V. GENERAL IMPACT CATEGORIES ..............................................................................................V-1
A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS.......................................V-1 B. GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT .............................V-2 C. SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES TO THE ENVIRONMENT ....................V-5
VI. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT.................................................................... VI-1
A. ALTERNATIVE A: NO PROJECT – 1981 SNOWCREEK MASTER PLAN............. VI-7 B. ALTERNATIVE B: ALTERNATE SITE PLAN ......................................................... VI-14 C. ALTERNATIVE C: REDUCED DENSITY.................................................................. VI-21 D. ALTERNATIVE D: INCREASED DENSITY .............................................................. VI-28 E. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE................................................ VI-35
VII. PREPARERS OF THE EIR AND PERSONS CONSULTED .....................................................VII-1 VIII. REFERENCES...............................................................................................................................VIII-1
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 Table of Contents Draft Environmental Impact Report Page iii SCH # 2006112015
APPENDICES (Under Separate Cover)
APPENDIX A: NOTICE OF PREPARATION (NOP) AND INITIAL STUDY APPENDIX B: RESPONSES TO NOP AND EIR SCOPING MEETING APPENDIX C: AIR QUALITY DATA APPENDIX D: BIOLOGY DATA APPENDIX E: CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT AND PEER REVIEW LETTER APPENDIX F: GEOTECHNICAL/HAZARDS REPORTS AND PEER REVIEW COMMENTS APPENDIX G: HYDROLOGY DATA APPENDIX H: NOISE DATA APPENDIX I: LETTERS FROM PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITY AGENCIES APPENDIX J: TRAFFIC DATA APPENDIX K: LAND EXCHANGE COVENANT APPENDIX L: WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT APPENDIX M: TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES DEVELOPER IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
REVISED JUNE 2007 APPENDIX N: AFFORDABLE HOUSING MITIGATION PLAN LETTER
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 Table of Contents Draft Environmental Impact Report Page iv SCH # 2006112015
FIGURES Figure Page
Figure II-1 Regional and Vicinity Map .............................................................................................. II-2 Figure II-2 Aerial Photograph............................................................................................................. II-3 Figure II-3 Project Areas Map ............................................................................................................ II-7 Figure II-4 Zoning Map..................................................................................................................... II-11 Figure II-5 Views of the Project Site A (Views 1, 2 and 3) ............................................................. II-13 Figure II-6 Views of the Project Site B (Views 4, 5 and 6) ............................................................. II-15 Figure II-7 Views of Surrounding Uses A (Views 7, 8 and 9)......................................................... II-17 Figure II-8 Views of Surrounding Uses B (Views 10, 11 and 12)................................................... II-19 Figure II-9 Views of Surrounding Uses C (Views 13, 14 and 15)................................................... II-21 Figure II-10 Related Projects Map...................................................................................................... II-29 Figure III-1 Developed or Under Construction Area for Snowcreek Master Plan ............................III-5 Figure III-2 Proposed New Development Areas for 2007 Master Plan.............................................III-7 Figure III-3 Land Exchange Boundary .............................................................................................III-13 Figure III-4 Illustrative Conceptual Plan...........................................................................................III-17 Figure III-5 Market/General Store and the Natural Resources and Historic Interpretive Center....III-21 Figure III-6 Hotel Level One Floor Plan...........................................................................................III-24 Figure III-7 Low Density Units ........................................................................................................III-27 Figure III-8 Medium Density Multi-Family Units............................................................................III-29 Figure III-9 High Density Multi-Family Units .................................................................................III-31 Figure III-10 Outfitters’ Cabin ............................................................................................................III-35 Figure III-11 Resident’s Club and Management Offices....................................................................III-37 Figure IV.B-1 Major View Corridors and Vistas ...............................................................................IV.B-7 Figure IV.B-2 Viewpoint Location Map.............................................................................................IV.B-9 Figure IV.B-3 View 1, Old Mammoth Road & Minaret Road, Looking South ..............................IV.B-13 Figure IV.B-4 View 2, Old Mammoth Road & Sherwin Creek Road, Looking South...................IV.B-15 Figure IV.B-5 View 3, Minaret Road, Looking South .....................................................................IV.B-17 Figure IV.B-6 View 4, Sherwin Creek Road, Looking West...........................................................IV.B-19 Figure IV.B-7 View 5, U.S. Forest Service Land to the West of Sherwin Creek Road..................IV.B-23 Figure IV.B-8 View 6, Panorama Dome, Looking East...................................................................IV.B-25 Figure IV.B-9 View 1, Old Mammoth Road and Minaret Road with Project.................................IV.B-37 Figure IV.B-10 View 2, Old Mammoth Road & Sherwin Creek Road with Project ........................IV.B-39 Figure IV.B-11 View 3, Minaret Road with Project...........................................................................IV.B-41 Figure IV.B-12 View 4, Sherwin Creek Road, Looking West with Project ......................................IV.B-45 Figure IV.B-13 View 5, U.S. Forest Service Land to the West of Sherwin Creek Road with Project ........................................................................................................................IV.B-47 Figure IV.B-14 View 6, Panorama Dome with Project......................................................................IV.B-49
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 Table of Contents Draft Environmental Impact Report Page v SCH # 2006112015
Figure IV.D-1 Plant Communities.................................................................................................... IV.D-21 Figure IV.F-1 Regional Seismicity Map ............................................................................................ IV.F-5 Figure IV.G-1 On-Site Drainage – Residential/Commercial Site ..................................................... IV.G-5 Figure IV.G-2 Off-Site Drainage – Golf Course Area....................................................................... IV.G-6 Figure IV.G-3 100-Year Flood Limit ................................................................................................. IV.G-7 Figure IV.M-1 Study Area Intersections and Circulation System .....................................................IV.M-2 Figure IV.M-2 Study Area Intersections Geometrics and Control Devices ......................................IV.M-7 Figure IV.M-3 Existing Condition Typical Winter Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ..............IV.M-8 Figure IV.M-4 Approved Project Locations and Trip Assessment..................................................IV.M-10 Figure IV.M-5 Cumulative Baseline Typical Winter Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .........IV.M-11 Figure IV.M-6 Snowcreek Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ............................................IV.M-16 Figure IV.M-7 Existing Plus Project Typical Winter Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .........IV.M-17 Figure IV.M-8 Cumulative Plus Project Typical Winter Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes....IV.M-19 Figure IV.N-1 Existing Water and Sewer Lines ................................................................................ IV.N-9 Figure VI-1 Alternative A: No Project Alternative 1981 Master Plan Buildout............................... VI-9 Figure VI-2 Alternative B: Revised Site Alternative Plan............................................................... VI-15 Figure VI-3 Alternative C: Reduced Density Alternative ............................................................... VI-23 Figure VI-4 Alternative D: Increased Density Alternative.............................................................. VI-29
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 Table of Contents Draft Environmental Impact Report Page vi SCH # 2006112015
TABLES Table Page
Table I-1 Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................................ I-7 Table II-1 Related Projects .............................................................................................................. II-23 Table III-1 Development Areas of the 1975 and 1981 Master Plans................................................III-3 Table III-2 Proposed 2006 Master Plan .............................................................................................III-4 Table III-3 Proposed 2006 Master Plan Development Summary ...................................................III-15 Table IV.B-1 Consistency with 1987 General Plan Applicable Aesthetics Policies......................IV.B-27 Table IV.B-2 Consistency with 2007 General Plan Applicable Aesthetics Policies......................IV.B-31 Table IV.C-1 Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes............................................IV.C-8 Table IV.C-2 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards....................................................IV.C-16 Table IV.C-3 PM10 and PM25 Concentration in the Mammoth Lakes Region ...............................IV.C-18 Table IV.C-4 Ambient Air Quality Ozone and CO Standards and Monitoring Data Near the Project Area................................................................................................................IV.C-19 Table IV.C-5 Estimated Daily Construction Emissions..................................................................IV.C-23 Table IV.C-6 Estimated Mitigated Daily Construction Emissions.................................................IV.C-26 Table IV.C-7 Estimated Daily Operational Emissions....................................................................IV.C-29 Table IV.C-8 PM10 Emissions for the Town of Mammoth Lakes as Outlined in the AQMP .......IV.C-30 Table IV.C-9 Summary of Localized CO Analysis (1 hour) for the Project ..................................IV.C-32 Table IV.C-10 Summary of Localized CO Analysis (8-hour) for the Project..................................IV.C-35 Table IV.C-11 Carbon Dioxide Emissions ........................................................................................IV.C-34 Table IV.C-12 Methane Emissions....................................................................................................IV.C-35 Table IV.C-13 Nitrous Oxide Emissions ...........................................................................................IV.C-35 Table IV.C-14 Project Compliance with 2006 CAT Report Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Strategies ..................................................................................................IV.C-37 Table IV.C-15 Net Emissions of PM10 from Snowcreek VIII ..........................................................IV.C-41 Table IV.D-1 Special Status Plant and Animal Species Evaluated for Potential to Occur in the Study Area ........................................................................................... IV.D-25 Table IV.F-1 Regional Faults and Seismicity ................................................................................... IV.F-4 Table IV.F-2 Seismic Design Parameters ....................................................................................... IV.F-11 Table IV.G-1 Designated Beneficial Uses of Mammoth Creek..................................................... IV.G-12 Table IV.H-1 Existing Land Use and Zoning On-Site ..................................................................... IV.H-3 Table IV.H-2 Comparison of Project Characteristics to Applicable Policies in the 1987 General Plan.............................................................................................................. IV.H-22 Table IV.H-3 Comparison of Project Characteristics to Applicable Policies in the 1987 General Plan.............................................................................................................. IV.H-42 Table IV.I-1 Representative Environmental Noise Levels ............................................................... IV.I-2
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 Table of Contents Draft Environmental Impact Report Page vii SCH # 2006112015
Table IV.I-2 Reaction of People and Damage to Buildings at Various Continuous Vibration Levels ............................................................................................................................ IV.I-5 Table IV.I-3 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Criteria................................................................. IV.I-6 Table IV.I-4 Town of Mammoth Lakes Exterior Noise Limits........................................................ IV.I-8 Table IV.I-5 Town of Mammoth Lakes Construction Noise Standards ........................................ IV.I-10 Table IV.I-6 Existing (Winter 2005) Roadway Noise Levels Onsite............................................. IV.I-12 Table IV.I-7 Existing (Winter 2005) Roadway Noise Levels Offsite ............................................ IV.I-13 Table IV.I-8 Noise Ranges of Typical Construction Equipment.................................................... IV.I-16 Table IV.I-9 Typical Outdoor Construction Noise Levels ............................................................. IV.I-17 Table IV.I-10 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment .............................................. IV.I-19 Table IV.I-11 Future Plus Project Roadway Noise Levels Onsite ................................................... IV.I-22 Table IV.I-12 Future Off-Site Future Roadway Noise Levels ......................................................... IV.I-23 Table IV.I-13 Cumulative Roadway Noise Levels ........................................................................... IV.I-27 Table IV.J-1 Housing Unit Growth Trends (1990-2024)..................................................................IV.J-1 Table IV.J-2 Mammoth Lakes Fair Share of Regional Housing Needs (2001-2008)......................IV.J-3 Table IV.J-3 Population Growth Trends (1970-2024) ......................................................................IV.J-4 Table IV.J-4 Employment by History 2000 ......................................................................................IV.J-5 Table IV.J-5 Estimated Employee Generation..................................................................................IV.J-7 Table IV.K-1 County of Mono California Crime Index (CCI), 2004-2005 .................................... IV.K-2 Table IV.K-2 Fire Stations that Serve the Project Area ................................................................... IV.K-6 Table IV.K-3 School Data for Project and Vicinity ....................................................................... IV.K-10 Table IV.K-4 Student Generation Rates for MUSD....................................................................... IV.K-12 Table IV.K-5 Park Areas Near the Project Site .............................................................................. IV.K-13 Table IV.L-1 Active and Planned Parkland Owned by or Available to the Town...........................IV.L-3 Table IV.L-2 Recreational Facilities in Mammoth Lakes ................................................................IV.L-4 Table IV.M-1 Intersection LOS Descriptions ...................................................................................IV.M-4 Table IV.M-2 Level of Service Parameters.......................................................................................IV.M-5 Table IV.M-3 Existing (2005) Typical Winter Saturday Intersection LOS .....................................IV.M-6 Table IV.M-4 Cumulative Typical Winter Saturday Intersection Levels of Service.......................IV.M-9 Table IV.M-5 Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................IV.M-14 Table IV.M-6 Existing Plus Project Typical Winter Saturday Intersection Levels of Service.......................................................................................................................IV.M-14 Table IV.M-7 Cumulative Plus Project Typical Winter Saturday Intersection Levels of Service.......................................................................................................................IV.M-20 Table IV.M-8 Long-Range Typical Winter Saturday Intersection Levels of Service....................IV.M-24 Table IV.N-1 Project Estimated Wastewater Demands ................................................................... IV.N-6 Table IV.N-2 Estimated Average Day and Peak Day Wastewater Generation for Project and Related Projects ................................................................................................. IV.N-11 Table IV.N-3 Existing Water Supply Reliability............................................................................ IV.N-17 Table IV.N-4 Annual Volumes of Groundwater Pumped.............................................................. IV.N-19
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 Table of Contents Draft Environmental Impact Report Page viii SCH # 2006112015
Table IV.N-5 Past, Current, and Projected Water Use ................................................................... IV.N-21 Table IV.N-6 Current Supply and Demand Without Project ......................................................... IV.N-22 Table IV.N-7 Future Water Supplies .............................................................................................. IV.N-24 Table IV.N-8 Existing Water Supply Reliability Plus 2025 Future Water Sources...................... IV.N-25 Table IV.N-9 Project Estimated Water Demands........................................................................... IV.N-28 Table IV.N-10 Existing Water Supply Comparison of Current Supply and Demand With Project Plus Related Projects.................................................................................... IV.N-31 Table IV.N-11 2025 Future Water Sources Comparison of Supply and Demand With Project Plus Related Projects ................................................................................................ IV.N-32 Table VI-1 Alternatives Project Components Comparison.............................................................. VI-6 Table VI-2 Alternatives Impacts Comparison ................................................................................ VI-36
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 I. Introduction/Summary Draft Environmental Impact Report Page I-1 SCH # 2006112015
I. INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
A. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Introduction/Summary is to provide the reader with a clear and simple description of the Project and its potential significant environmental impacts. Section 15123 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the summary identify each significant effect and recommended mitigation measures and alternatives that would minimize or avoid potential significant impacts. The summary is also required to identify areas of controversy known to the Lead Agency, including issues raised by agencies and the public, and issues to be resolved, including the choice among alternatives and whether or how to mitigate significant effects. This section focuses on the major areas of the Project that are important to decision-makers and uses non-technical language to promote understanding. This summary is intended as an overview and should be used in conjunction with a thorough reading of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR). The text of this report, including figures, tables, and appendices, serve as the basis for this summary.
The subject of this Draft EIR is the proposed Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 Project (Project).1 Upon certification, this Draft EIR will update and supersede the Town of Mammoth Lakes’ 1974 and 1981 EIRs for the previous iterations of the Snowcreek Master Plan. A detailed description of the Project is contained in Section III (Project Description) of this report.
Because the Project will require approval of certain discretionary actions by the Town of Mammoth Lakes (Town), the Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), for which the Town is the designated Lead Agency. The Town’s Planning Division administers the process by which environmental documents for private projects are prepared and reviewed. On the basis of these procedures, it was determined that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment and that an EIR should be prepared.
B. PURPOSE OF THE EIR
The Town has commissioned this EIR on the Project for the following purposes:
• To satisfy CEQA requirements.
• To inform the general public, the local community, and responsible, trustee, and state and federal agencies of the nature of the Project, its potentially significant environmental effects, feasible
1 At the time the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was distributed on October 16, 2006, the Project was referred to as the 2006 Revised Snowcreek Master Plan. However, the Project has since been renamed to remain consistent with the current year.
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 I. Introduction/Summary Draft Environmental Impact Report Page I-2 SCH # 2006112015
mitigation measures to mitigate those effects, and reasonable and feasible alternatives to the Project.
• To enable the Town to consider the environmental consequences of approving the Project.
• For consideration by responsible agencies in issuing permits and approvals for the Project.
As described in §15121 (a) and 15362 of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR is an informational document that will inform public agency decision makers and the public of the significant environmental effects of a project, identify possible ways to minimize the significant effects, and describe reasonable alternatives to a project. The purpose of this EIR, therefore, is to focus the discussion on those potential effects on the environment of the Project that the Lead Agency has determined are or may be significant. In addition, feasible mitigation measures are required, when applicable, that could reduce significant impacts to insignificant levels.
The Lead Agency is required to consider the information in the EIR, along with any other relevant information, in making its decision on the Project. Although the EIR does not determine the ultimate decision that will be made regarding implementation of the Project, CEQA requires the Town to consider the information in the EIR and make findings regarding each significant effect of the Project.
This Draft EIR was prepared in accordance with §15151 of the CEQA Guidelines, which defines the standards for EIR adequacy:
An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An evaluation of the environmental effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in the light of what is reasonably feasible. Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate, but the EIR would summarize the main points of disagreement among the experts. The courts have looked not for perfection; but for adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure.
C. PROPOSED PROJECT
The Project consists of adoption by the Town of the Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 (2007 Master Plan) to revise the Updated Master Plan for Snowcreek at Mammoth (1981 Master Plan), which was an update of the original Snowcreek Master Plan (1974 Master Plan). The 2007 Master Plan or Project addresses proposed build-out of the remaining Snowcreek Master Plan area (i.e., Snowcreek VIII) and is intended to fulfill the vision of the previously approved master plans.
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 I. Introduction/Summary Draft Environmental Impact Report Page I-3 SCH # 2006112015
The Project proposes the development of 850 residential dwelling units, 400 Hotel rooms/suites, and up to 75,0002 square feet for non-residential uses on a total of approximately 237 acres. The following provides a brief account of these components:
• Residential: The residential component could include a mix of residential uses from condominium units, single family dwellings, stacked flats and townhomes that will vary in size from 650 square feet (minimum) to 3,500 square feet (maximum). A Resident’s Club with a snack bar, pool, spa and grill will accompany this component.
• Resort: The resort component will include 400 guest suites that will be part hotel, part Private Residence Club (PRC)/suite units or the like. The resort will also include retail space, a lounge, a fitness area, a pool, a spa/wellness center, and an ice skating pond.
• Recreation: While recreational amenities are incorporated throughout the Project, additional stand-alone recreational components will include a Golf Clubhouse, an expanded golf course and attendant facilities, and the Outfitters’ Cabin. The existing privately owned publicly accessible nine-hole golf course on the north and west portions of the Project site will be expanded to include nine additional holes on the east and south edges of the Project site, thus creating a privately owned publicly accessible 18-hole golf course.
• Retail: In addition to the retail space provided at the resort, a stand-alone Market/General Store (The Store) will be incorporated into the Project. The Store will serve the “Old Mammoth” portion of the Town with food, deli, drinks, and sundries. The Store draws inspiration from the historic Lutz Market during the early settlement days of Mammoth Camp.
• Public Amenities:3 In addition to public amenities provided in the expanded and enhanced golf course facilities, the Project will include amenities to enhance public recreational opportunities and support economic stability. These amenities will include a Natural Resources and Historic Interpretive Center (Interpretive Center), an Outfitters’ Cabin, and the provision of Hotel rooms/suites, restaurants, retail, and conference facilities.
D. AREAS OF KNOWN CONTROVERSIES
Section 15123 of the CEQA Guidelines requires an EIR to identify areas of controversy known to the Lead Agency, including issues raised by agencies and the public, and issues to be resolved.
2 This number has increased from 50,000 square feet since the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was distributed on October 16, 2006.
3 A propane tank farm while located on Snowcreek property is no longer part of the Project application and is treated as a related project for the purposes of analyzing cumulative impacts. The applicant for the propane tank farm is Turner Propane.
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 I. Introduction/Summary Draft Environmental Impact Report Page I-4 SCH # 2006112015
Environmental concerns raised at the EIR scoping meeting and in letters submitted to the Town of Mammoth Lakes in response to the Notice of Preparation (NOP) of the EIR include:
• Biological impacts (native shrub habitat, songbird migration)
• Recreation impacts (public access to Kerry Meadow, loss of driving range, public golf course, location of Outfitter’s Cabin, access to the Sherwin Mountain Range)
• Transportation impacts (SR 203 including US 395/SR 203 Interchange)
• Land use
• Undiscovered archaeological and cultural resources
• Density
• Aesthetics (building heights and setbacks, blocked views)
• Increased traffic
• Water supply
• Watershed drainage
• Water flow and pressure requirements (associated with building heights)
• Water quality, low-impact development standards
• Emergency and evacuation plans
• Increased demand on public services
• Snow removal and storage
• Fire safety and increased service demand
E. ALTERNATIVES
This EIR considers a range of alternatives to the Project to provide informed decision-making in accordance with §15126(d) of the CEQA Guidelines. The alternatives analyzed in this EIR include: A) No Project (required by CEQA) – this would be buildout of the site under the existing entitlements and existing 1981 Master Plan, B) Revised Site Plan – same number of units but an alternate configuration designed to minimize impacts. C) Reduced Density – an approximate 50% reduction in residential units,
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 I. Introduction/Summary Draft Environmental Impact Report Page I-5 SCH # 2006112015
D) Increased Density – “build-out of all remaining Snowcreek Master Plan units.4 For further discussion of these alternatives, see Section VI of this Draft EIR. Based on the analysis in Section VI, Alternative C (Reduced Density) was selected as the environmentally superior alternative.
F. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Table I-1 summarizes the various environmental impacts associated with the Project; includes the mitigation measures recommended to reduce or avoid the environmental impacts; and identifies the level of impact significance after mitigation.
4 The density bonus of 36.625 units would not apply to the Project and instead would remain with the Snowcreek Athletic Club property. Alternative D has been prepared to show the impacts of the Project without the density bonus.
Town of Mammoth Lakes August 2007
Snowcreek VIII, Snowcreek Master Plan Update - 2007 I. Introduction/Summary Draft Environmental Impact Report Page I-6 SCH # 2006112015
This page intentionally left blank.
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I.
Intr
oduc
tion/
Sum
mar
y D
raft
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
Rep
ort
Page
I-7
SCH
# 2
0050
9210
3
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
AES
THE
TIC
S (A
ES)
Impa
ct A
ES-1
a C
onsis
tenc
y wi
th P
olic
ies (
1987
Gen
eral
Pla
n)
Seve
ral p
olic
ies i
n th
e G
ener
al P
lan
are
appl
icab
le to
the
Proj
ect w
ith re
spec
t to
visu
al r
esou
rces
. Th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld b
e ge
nera
lly c
onsis
tent
with
mos
t of
the
appl
icab
le p
olic
ies
asso
ciat
ed w
ith a
esth
etic
s in
the
198
7 G
ener
al P
lan
with
re
spec
t to
the
iden
tifie
d vi
ewpo
ints.
How
ever
, the
Hot
el e
lem
ent o
f the
Pro
ject
w
ould
not
be
cons
isten
t with
198
7 G
ener
al P
lan
polic
ies
perta
inin
g to
sce
nic
vista
s be
caus
e it
wou
ld a
lter
the
visu
al c
hara
cter
of
the
site,
whi
ch w
ould
be
appa
rent
to v
iew
ers
look
ing
tow
ard
the
Sher
win
Ran
ge fr
om p
ublic
are
as n
ear
the
Proj
ect s
ite.
The
Hot
el e
lem
ent o
f th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld a
lso b
e in
cons
isten
t w
ith th
e he
ight
lim
itatio
n co
ntai
ned
in th
e To
wn'
s Zon
ing
Code
unl
ess t
he T
own
Coun
cil
appr
oves
th
e re
ques
ted
Zone
Co
de
Am
endm
ent.
Th
eref
ore,
de
velo
pmen
t of
the
Pro
ject
wou
ld c
reat
e an
im
pact
for
whi
ch t
here
are
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
avai
labl
e an
d th
is im
pact
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
sig
nific
ant
and
unav
oida
ble.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re a
vaila
ble.
Si
gnifi
cant
and
Una
void
able
Impa
ct A
ES-1
b C
onsis
tenc
y wi
th P
olic
ies (
2007
Gen
eral
Pla
n)
The
2007
Gen
eral
Pla
n se
ts fo
rth p
olic
ies
and
impl
emen
tatio
n m
easu
res
to
ensu
re th
e pr
eser
vatio
n of
the
visu
al re
sour
ces a
nd v
isual
cha
ract
er o
f the
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes.
A c
onsis
tenc
y an
alys
is of
the
Pro
ject
with
app
licab
le
polic
ies
cont
aine
d w
ithin
the
prop
osed
Gen
eral
Pla
n w
as p
repa
red.
W
hile
the
2007
Gen
eral
Pla
n do
es n
ot e
xplic
itly
proh
ibit
a 12
0-fo
ot H
otel
, the
Tow
n’s
Mun
icip
al C
ode
does
. Whe
ther
the
Tow
n de
cide
s to
amen
d th
e zo
ning
cod
e an
d al
low
the
Hot
el t
o ha
ve i
ncre
ased
hei
ght
or n
ot, t
he P
roje
ct w
ould
cre
ate
an
impa
ct f
or w
hich
the
re a
re n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s av
aila
ble
and
this
impa
ct
wou
ld b
e sig
nific
ant a
nd u
navo
idab
le.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re a
vaila
ble.
Si
gnifi
cant
and
Una
void
able
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-8
SCH
# 2
0061
1201
5
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Impa
ct A
ES-2
Pub
lic V
iews
and
Sce
nic
Vista
s
A t
otal
of
6 vi
ews
depi
ctin
g be
fore
and
afte
r th
e Pr
ojec
t is
cons
truct
ed w
ere
prep
ared
. Th
e lo
catio
ns fr
om w
hich
the
view
s wer
e ta
ken
are
as fo
llow
s:
Vie
w 1
: Old
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad a
nd M
inar
et R
oad
Look
ing
Sout
h
Vie
w 2
: Old
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad a
nd S
herw
in C
reek
Roa
d Lo
okin
g So
uth
Vie
w 3
: M
inar
et R
oad
Look
ing
Sout
h
Vie
w 4
: Sh
erw
in C
reek
Roa
d Lo
okin
g W
est
Vie
w 5
: U
.S. F
ores
t Ser
vice
Lan
ds to
the
Wes
t of S
herw
in C
reek
Roa
d
Vie
w 6
: Pa
nora
ma
Dom
e Tr
ail L
ooki
ng E
ast
The
Proj
ect w
ould
not
obs
cure
vie
ws o
f the
She
rwin
Ran
ge fr
om V
iew
s 2 a
nd 3
. V
iew
s of
the
She
rwin
Ran
ge f
rom
Vie
ws
1, 4
, 5,
and
6 w
ould
be
sligh
tly
obsc
ured
. H
owev
er, t
he P
roje
ct w
ould
res
ult i
n su
bsta
ntia
l cha
nges
to v
isual
ch
arac
ter o
n th
e Pr
ojec
t site
with
in th
e vi
ewsh
ed, r
esul
ting
in im
pact
s to
vie
ws.
N
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
ava
ilabl
e to
fully
miti
gate
such
impa
cts.
The
refo
re,
impa
cts t
o vi
ews w
ould
be
signi
fican
t and
una
void
able
.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re a
vaila
ble.
Si
gnifi
cant
and
Una
void
able
Impa
ct A
ES-
3 S
ceni
c R
esou
rces
with
in a
Sta
te S
ceni
c H
ighw
ay
In t
he v
icin
ity o
f th
e To
wn
of M
amm
oth
Lake
s, St
ate
Hig
hway
203
(M
ain
Stre
et) i
s an
elig
ible
Sta
te S
ceni
c H
ighw
ay (n
ot o
ffici
ally
des
igna
ted)
and
U.S
. H
ighw
ay 3
95 i
s an
offi
cial
ly d
esig
nate
d St
ate
Scen
ic H
ighw
ay.
Im
pact
s to
sc
enic
res
ourc
es o
bser
vabl
e fro
m a
Sta
te S
ceni
c H
ighw
ay w
ould
be
less
than
sig
nific
ant w
ith th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he P
roje
ct.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct A
ES-
4 V
isual
Cha
ract
er a
nd D
esig
n
The
Proj
ect w
ould
be
desig
ned
to c
ompl
emen
t the
exi
sting
alp
ine
arch
itect
ural
ch
arac
ter o
f nea
rby
deve
lopm
ent a
nd e
lsew
here
with
in th
e To
wn
of M
amm
oth
Lake
s. T
he T
own
wou
ld r
evie
w a
ll fin
al b
uild
ing
desig
ns to
ens
ure
that
the
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re a
vaila
ble.
Si
gnifi
cant
and
Una
void
able
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-9
SCH
# 2
0061
1201
5
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Proj
ect
wou
ld b
e re
spon
sive
to,
and
expr
essiv
e of
, its
uni
que
alpi
ne s
ettin
g.
How
ever
, th
e Pr
ojec
t w
ould
rep
rese
nt a
sub
stant
ial
chan
ge i
n th
e vi
sual
ch
arac
ter
of t
he P
roje
ct s
ite b
y co
nstru
ctin
g ho
usin
g an
d re
sort
uses
on
a fo
rmer
ly u
ndev
elop
ed m
eado
w.
This
chan
ge in
cha
ract
er w
ould
be
signi
fican
t.
The
Tow
n Co
de a
lread
y re
quire
s th
e Pr
ojec
t to
unde
rgo
desig
n re
view
whi
ch
will
rev
iew
the
loc
atio
n of
bui
ldin
gs, b
ulk
and
mas
sing,
mat
eria
ls an
d co
lors
w
ith t
he g
oal
of f
urth
erin
g ge
nera
l pl
an p
olic
ies
and
redu
cing
the
aes
thet
ic
impa
cts
of th
e Pr
ojec
t. T
here
are
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
avai
labl
e th
at w
ould
re
duce
this
impa
ct; t
here
fore
this
impa
ct is
sign
ifica
nt a
nd u
navo
idab
le.
Impa
ct A
ES-
5 S
igna
ge
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re A
ES-
5
The
Proj
ect w
ould
pro
vide
sig
nage
that
is d
esig
ned
to b
e cl
ear,
unde
rsta
ndab
le
and
attra
ctiv
e to
bot
h th
e ve
hicu
lar a
nd p
edes
trian
vie
wer
. Th
e sig
nage
wou
ld
refle
ct th
e m
ount
ain
retre
at c
omm
unity
cha
ract
er o
f th
e Pr
ojec
t with
reg
ard
to
mat
eria
ls, fo
rm a
nd u
se.
Sign
age
wou
ld in
form
and
dire
ct, b
ut in
a m
anne
r and
sty
le w
hich
is
inte
nded
to
crea
te a
mem
orab
le i
mpr
essio
n an
d sh
ow a
co
nnec
tion
to n
atur
e, a
rchi
tect
ure
and
the
histo
ric p
ast.
Sig
nage
wou
ld l
ink
toge
ther
the
ent
ire r
esor
t, cl
ubs,
and
resid
entia
l co
mpo
nent
s, an
d cu
ltiva
te a
n in
clus
ive
rela
tions
hip
thro
ugho
ut th
e Pr
ojec
t site
. C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
AES
-5 w
ould
ens
ure
that
impa
cts r
elat
ed to
sign
age
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an
signi
fican
t.
Prio
r to
the
issua
nce
of b
uild
ing
perm
its, a
ll bu
ildin
gs c
onta
inin
g th
ree
or m
ore
sepa
rate
bu
sines
ses
shal
l pr
epar
e a
Mas
ter
Sign
Pla
n, i
n ac
cord
ance
with
the
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Mun
icip
al C
ode
Chap
ter 1
7.34
and
17.
40.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct A
ES-
6 L
ight
and
Gla
re
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re A
ES-
6
Alth
ough
the
Proj
ect w
ould
be
requ
ired
to im
plem
ent a
nd b
e co
nsist
ent w
ith a
ll To
wn
ordi
nanc
es re
late
d to
out
door
ligh
ting,
the
intro
duct
ion
of li
ght a
nd g
lare
on
a fo
rmer
ly u
ndev
elop
ed m
eado
w w
ould
cre
ate
a ne
w s
ourc
e of
ligh
t or g
lare
th
at w
ould
be
notic
eabl
e an
d w
ould
exp
and
the
exist
ing
lit f
ootp
rint
of t
he
Tow
n. P
roje
ct li
ghtin
g w
ould
alte
r nig
httim
e vi
ews
from
Vie
ws
1, 2
, 4, 5
, and
6.
Th
is w
ould
be
a sig
nific
ant i
mpa
ct.
Alth
ough
com
plia
nce
with
Miti
gatio
n
Prio
r to
occ
upan
cy,
all
light
ing
on t
he P
roje
ct s
ite s
hall
com
ply
with
the
app
licab
le
requ
irem
ents
of th
e To
wn
of M
amm
oth
Lake
s Out
door
Lig
htin
g O
rdin
ance
, in
acco
rdan
ce
with
Mam
mot
h La
kes M
unic
ipal
Cod
e Ch
apte
r 17.
34.
Sign
ifica
nt a
nd U
navo
idab
le
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-10
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Mea
sure
AES
-6 is
requ
ired,
suc
h co
mpl
ianc
e w
ould
not
redu
ce th
is im
pact
to a
le
ss t
han
signi
fican
t le
vel.
The
refo
re,
this
impa
ct w
ould
be
signi
fican
t an
d un
avoi
dabl
e.
Impa
ct A
ES-8
Cum
ulat
ive
Impa
cts
Ther
e ar
e 41
rela
ted
proj
ects
in th
e vi
cini
ty o
f the
Pro
ject
. Re
late
d pr
ojec
ts th
at
are
clos
e en
ough
to
the
Proj
ect
site
have
a d
irect
cum
ulat
ive
visu
al q
ualit
y im
pact
in c
ombi
natio
n w
ith th
e Pr
ojec
t. T
hese
rela
ted
proj
ects
are
loca
ted
alon
g O
ld M
amm
oth
Road
in th
e vi
cini
ty o
f the
Pro
ject
site
.
As
desc
ribed
in th
is se
ctio
n, th
e Pr
ojec
t, al
thou
gh c
onsis
tent
in c
hara
cter
with
su
rroun
ding
dev
elop
men
t, w
ould
res
ult
in s
igni
fican
t im
pact
s to
the
visu
al
char
acte
r of
the
Pro
ject
site
and
vie
ws
of t
he S
herw
in R
ange
. E
ach
of t
he
rela
ted
proj
ects
prop
osed
for t
he P
roje
ct v
icin
ity w
ould
be
requ
ired
to c
onfo
rm
to T
own
deve
lopm
ent
regu
latio
ns a
nd b
e re
view
ed a
gain
st To
wn
desig
n gu
idel
ines
prio
r to
fin
al a
ppro
val.
How
ever
, de
velo
pmen
t of
the
Pro
ject
in
asso
ciat
ion
with
thes
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts w
ould
resu
lt in
a g
radu
al in
fill o
f exi
sting
de
velo
pmen
t in
this
sect
or o
f the
Tow
n, w
hich
wou
ld re
sult
in c
hang
es in
visu
al
char
acte
r in
the
area
. Th
eref
ore,
the
Proj
ect c
ombi
ned
with
the
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld r
esul
t in
a c
umul
ativ
e im
pact
to
view
s an
d th
e vi
sual
cha
ract
er o
f th
e To
wn.
As a
resu
lt, c
umul
ativ
e im
pact
s with
resp
ect t
o sc
enic
vie
ws a
nd e
xisti
ng
visu
al c
hara
cter
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
sig
nific
ant a
nd th
e Pr
ojec
t’s in
crem
enta
l co
ntrib
utio
n to
cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts w
ould
be
signi
fican
t.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re a
vaila
ble.
Si
gnifi
cant
and
Una
void
able
AIR
QU
AL
ITY
(AQ
)
Impa
ct A
Q-1
Con
struc
tion
Impa
cts
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re A
Q-1
Fore
seea
ble
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
fo
r th
e Pr
ojec
t w
ould
in
clud
e sit
e pr
epar
atio
n, g
radi
ng, p
lace
men
t of
utili
ties
and
othe
r in
frastr
uctu
re, p
lace
men
t of
foun
datio
ns f
or s
truct
ures
, rem
oval
of e
xisti
ng s
truct
ures
, and
fabr
icat
ion
of
The
Proj
ect
appl
ican
t sh
all
requ
ire t
hat
the
follo
win
g pr
actic
es b
e im
plem
ente
d by
in
clud
ing
them
in
the
cont
ract
or c
onstr
uctio
n do
cum
ents
to r
educ
e th
e em
issio
ns o
f po
lluta
nts g
ener
ated
by
heav
y-du
ty d
iese
l-pow
ered
equ
ipm
ent o
pera
ting
at th
e Pr
ojec
t site
Sign
ifica
nt a
nd U
navo
idab
le
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-11
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
struc
ture
s ac
ross
the
entir
e ap
prox
imat
ely
237-
acre
Pro
ject
are
a.
The
Proj
ect
has b
een
orga
nize
d so
that
it c
ould
be
deve
lope
d in
seve
ral p
hase
s, w
ith th
e go
lf co
urse
exp
ansio
n an
d H
otel
con
struc
tion
occu
rring
in
the
first
phas
es a
nd
vario
us r
esid
entia
l co
mpo
nent
s be
ing
prog
ress
ivel
y co
nstru
cted
at
a pa
ce
dict
ated
by
mar
ket
cond
ition
s. E
ach
phas
e w
ould
ope
rate
suc
cess
fully
as
a co
mpl
ete
entit
y th
roug
hout
the
ent
ire d
evel
opm
ent.
All
stagi
ng w
ould
occ
ur
with
in
the
Proj
ect
boun
darie
s.
Mos
t co
nstru
ctio
n ph
ases
w
ould
la
st ap
prox
imat
ely
18 to
24
mon
ths
but s
ome
may
be
as lo
ng a
s 24
to 3
0 m
onth
s.
Som
e ph
ases
may
be
unde
r con
struc
tion
simul
tane
ously
. Co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es
are
prop
osed
to b
e co
mpl
ete
in 2
017.
Due
to
the
cons
truct
ion
time
fram
e an
d th
e no
rmal
day
-to-d
ay v
aria
bilit
y in
co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es, i
t is
diffi
cult
to p
reci
sely
qua
ntify
the
dai
ly e
miss
ions
as
soci
ated
with
eac
h ph
ase
of th
e pr
opos
ed c
onstr
uctio
n ac
tiviti
es.
Non
ethe
less
, da
ily e
miss
ions
tha
t ar
e es
timat
ed t
o oc
cur
on p
eak
cons
truct
ion
days
was
es
tabl
ished
. H
owev
er, t
he G
reat
Val
ley
Basin
Uni
fied
Air
Pollu
tion
Con
trol
Dist
rict
does
not
cur
rent
ly h
ave
thre
shol
ds f
or d
eter
min
ing
the
leve
l of
sig
nific
ance
for a
ir em
issio
ns.
In th
e ab
senc
e of
such
thre
shol
ds, a
ny e
miss
ions
th
at
may
re
sult
in
a vi
olat
ion
of
an
air
qual
ity
stand
ard
or
cont
ribut
e su
bsta
ntia
lly to
an
exist
ing
air
qual
ity v
iola
tion
will
be
cons
ider
ed s
igni
fican
t.
Sinc
e re
spira
ble
parti
cula
te m
atte
r (P
M10
) is
clas
sifie
d as
non
-atta
inm
ent,
any
PM10
em
issio
ns w
ill c
ontri
bute
sub
stant
ially
to a
n ex
istin
g ai
r qua
lity
viol
atio
n.
Ther
efor
e, u
nles
s PM
10 e
miss
ions
are
red
uced
by
impl
emen
tatio
n of
fea
sible
co
ntro
l m
easu
res,
impa
cts
caus
ed b
y th
ese
emiss
ions
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
sig
nific
ant.
Ev
en
with
im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
reco
mm
ende
d m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s ou
tline
d, d
evel
opm
ent o
f th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld c
ontin
ue to
res
ult i
n th
e ge
nera
tion
of p
ollu
tant
em
issio
ns.
In
addi
tion,
PM
10 e
miss
ions
can
not
be
redu
ced
to z
ero
with
the
im
plem
enta
tion
of t
he r
ecom
men
ded
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res.
The
refo
re, t
he P
roje
ct w
ould
con
tinue
to r
esul
t in
a sig
nific
ant a
nd
unav
oida
ble
impa
ct w
ith re
gard
to P
M10
em
issio
ns.
thro
ugho
ut th
e Pr
ojec
t con
struc
tion
phas
es:
a.
Wat
er a
ll co
nstru
ctio
n ar
eas a
t lea
st tw
ice
daily
; wat
er tr
ucks
will
be
fille
d lo
cally
af
ter t
he c
ontra
ctor
mak
es w
ater
acq
uisit
ion
agre
emen
ts an
d ob
tain
s any
requ
ired
perm
its.
b.
Cove
r all
truck
s hau
ling
soil,
sand
, and
oth
er lo
ose
mat
eria
ls;
c.
App
ly c
lean
gra
vel,
wat
er,
or n
on-to
xic
soil
stabi
lizer
s on
all
unpa
ved
acce
ss
road
s, pa
rkin
g ar
eas a
nd st
agin
g ar
eas a
t con
struc
tion
sites
;
d.
Rem
ove
exce
ss s
oils
from
pav
ed a
cces
s roa
ds, p
arki
ng a
reas
and
sta
ging
are
as a
t co
nstru
ctio
n sit
es;
e.
Swee
p str
eets
daily
(with
mec
hani
cal s
wee
pers
) if v
isibl
e so
il m
ater
ial i
s ca
rried
on
to a
djac
ent p
ublic
stre
ets;
f. H
ydro
seed
or
appl
y no
n-to
xic
soil
stabi
lizer
s to
ina
ctiv
e co
nstru
ctio
n ar
eas
(pre
viou
sly g
rade
d ar
eas i
nact
ive
for t
en d
ays o
r mor
e);
g.
Encl
ose,
cov
er,
wat
er t
wic
e da
ily,
or a
pply
non
-toxi
c so
il bi
nder
s to
exp
osed
sto
ckpi
les (
dirt,
sand
, etc
.);
h.
Lim
it tra
ffic
spee
ds o
n un
pave
d ro
ads t
o 15
mile
s per
hou
r;
i. In
stall
grav
el-b
ags,
cobb
le e
ntrie
s, or
oth
er B
est M
anag
emen
t Pra
ctic
es (B
MPs
) an
d er
osio
n co
ntro
l mea
sure
s to
prev
ent s
ilt ru
noff
to p
ublic
road
way
s;
j. Re
plan
t veg
etat
ion
in d
istur
bed
area
s as s
oon
as p
ossib
le;
k.
Insta
ll w
heel
was
hers
for
all
exiti
ng tr
ucks
or
was
h of
f th
e tir
es o
r tra
cks
of a
ll tru
cks a
nd e
quip
men
t lea
ving
the
cons
truct
ion
site;
l. Su
spen
d ex
cava
tion
and
grad
ing
activ
ities
whe
n w
ind
(as
insta
ntan
eous
gus
ts)
exce
eds
50 m
iles
per
hour
(m
ph)
and
whe
n su
stain
ed w
inds
exc
eed
25 m
ph
incr
ease
the
frequ
ency
of
wat
erin
g fro
m tw
ice
daily
, as
desc
ribed
in M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
AQ
-1a
abov
e, to
thre
e to
four
tim
es a
day
;
m.
The
cons
truct
ion
fleet
will
mee
t th
e te
rms
set
forth
in
the
CARB
Pro
pose
d
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-12
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Regu
latio
n fo
r in
-use
Off
Road
Die
sel
Veh
icle
s, pa
ragr
aph
(d)(3
) Id
ling.
Th
e pr
opos
ed re
gula
tion
impl
emen
tatio
n da
te is
May
1, 2
008.
n.
Lim
it th
e ho
urs
of o
pera
tion
of h
eavy
dut
y eq
uipm
ent
and/
or t
he a
mou
nt o
f eq
uipm
ent i
n us
e;
o.
All
equi
pmen
t sh
all
be p
rope
rly t
uned
and
mai
ntai
ned
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith t
he
man
ufac
ture
r’s sp
ecifi
catio
ns;
p.
Whe
n fe
asib
le, a
ltern
ativ
e fu
eled
or
elec
trica
l co
nstru
ctio
n eq
uipm
ent
shal
l be
us
ed fo
r the
Pro
ject
site
;
q.
Use
the
min
imum
pra
ctic
al e
ngin
e siz
e fo
r con
struc
tion
equi
pmen
t;
r. G
asol
ine-
pow
ered
equ
ipm
ent s
hall
be e
quip
ped
with
cat
alyt
ic c
onve
rters
, whe
re
feas
ible
; and
Impa
ct A
Q-2
Ope
ratio
nal E
miss
ions
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
AQ
-2
Acc
ordi
ng to
the
Air
Qua
lity
Man
agem
ent P
lan,
par
ticul
ate
mat
ter
that
cau
ses
PM10
vio
latio
ns c
onsis
ts pr
imar
ily o
f roa
d du
st an
d so
ot fr
om w
ood
com
busti
on.
In o
ther
wor
ds, t
ailp
ipe
emiss
ions
fro
m h
eavy
-dut
y di
esel
eng
ines
con
stitu
te a
m
inor
or
negl
igib
le c
ompo
nent
of
PM10
impa
cts
in th
e M
amm
oth
Lake
s ar
ea.
An
anal
ysis
of d
aily
ope
ratio
nal
emiss
ions
has
bee
n pr
epar
ed u
tiliz
ing
the
URB
EMIS
200
2 co
mpu
ter m
odel
. A
s di
scus
sed
prev
ious
ly, t
he P
roje
ct w
ould
be
div
ided
into
fou
r ph
ases
. Th
e op
erat
iona
l em
issio
ns f
rom
Pha
se I
and
the
cons
truct
ion
emiss
ions
from
Pha
se II
hav
e be
en c
ombi
ned.
As C
O, N
Ox,
RO
C,
and
SOx
are
clas
sifie
d as
in a
ttain
men
t, th
e em
issio
ns o
f the
se p
ollu
tant
s w
ould
co
nstit
ute
less
-than
-sig
nific
ant i
mpa
cts.
The
tota
l PM
10 e
miss
ions
ant
icip
ated
as
a re
sult
of th
e Pr
ojec
t at i
ts co
mpl
etio
n is
422,
193
gram
s pe
r day
. A
s a
resu
lt,
parti
cula
te e
miss
ions
gen
erat
ed b
y w
ood
com
busti
on fr
om th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld n
ot
cont
ribut
e to
Fed
eral
and
Sta
te P
M10
vio
latio
ns.
Sinc
e th
e A
QM
P th
resh
olds
of
106,
600
Veh
icle
s M
iles
Trav
eled
(V
MT)
per
day
and
one
EPA
II
solid
-fuel
bu
rnin
g ap
plia
nces
per
res
iden
tial
unit
are
only
mea
nt t
o ad
dres
s cu
mul
ativ
e
The
Proj
ect a
pplic
ant s
hall
requ
ire th
e fo
llow
ing
impl
emen
tatio
n m
easu
res t
o re
duce
PM
10
oper
atio
nal e
miss
ions
resu
lting
from
the
Proj
ect t
o a
less
than
sign
ifica
nt le
vel:
a.
The
Proj
ect
shal
l in
clud
e a
trans
porta
tion
dem
and
man
agem
ent
prog
ram
to
redu
ce
over
all
vehi
cle
mile
s tra
vele
d (V
MTs
), in
or
der
to
dem
onstr
ate
com
plia
nce
with
the
Fede
ral P
M10
sta
ndar
d of
150
mic
rogr
ams
per c
ubic
met
er
(µg/
m.3
) T
he p
rogr
am s
hall
incl
ude,
but
not
be
limite
d to
, circ
ulat
ion
syste
m
impr
ovem
ents,
shut
tles t
o an
d fro
m p
arki
ng a
reas
, and
the
loca
tion
of fa
cilit
ies t
o en
cour
age
pede
stria
n ci
rcul
atio
n.
b.
The
Proj
ect
shal
l be
lin
ked
to e
xisti
ng d
evel
oped
are
as t
hrou
gh e
xisti
ng r
oad
netw
orks
, pub
lic tr
ansit
sys
tem
s, op
en s
pace
sys
tem
s, an
d bi
cycl
e an
d pe
destr
ian
syste
ms.
c.
The
Proj
ect s
hall
impl
emen
t trip
redu
ctio
n m
easu
res p
artic
ular
ly d
urin
g PM
pea
k tra
ffic
hour
s to
disp
erse
trip
s be
twee
n pa
rkin
g ar
eas
and
mou
ntai
n po
rtals
to a
nd
from
the
ski a
rea.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-13
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
impa
cts,
oper
atio
nal
impa
cts
from
PM
10 e
miss
ions
will
be
addr
esse
d in
the
cu
mul
ativ
e im
pact
s sec
tion
belo
w.
d.
Resid
entia
l con
dom
iniu
m u
nits
shal
l ent
er in
to a
tran
sit f
ee a
gree
men
t with
the
Tow
n co
nsist
ent w
ith th
e To
wn’
s esta
blish
ed T
rans
it Fe
e A
gree
men
t Pro
gram
.
e.
No
solid
fuel
bur
ning
app
lianc
es sh
all b
e pe
rmitt
ed w
ithin
resid
entia
l uni
ts w
ithin
m
ulti-
fam
ily re
siden
tial d
evel
opm
ents.
Impa
ct A
Q-3
Loc
al C
O C
once
ntra
tions
Traf
fic-c
onge
sted
road
way
s an
d in
ters
ectio
ns h
ave
the
pote
ntia
l to
gen
erat
e lo
caliz
ed h
igh
leve
ls of
car
bon
mon
oxid
e (C
O).
By
gene
ratin
g ad
ditio
nal
traffi
c, th
e Pr
ojec
t cou
ld p
oten
tially
cau
se e
xcee
danc
es o
f the
1-h
our o
r 8-h
our
Fede
ral
or S
tate
CO
sta
ndar
ds.
Base
d on
the
CA
LIN
E4 c
ompu
ter-m
odel
ing
resu
lts, l
ocal
CO
con
cent
ratio
ns w
ould
not
exc
eed
state
or n
atio
nal a
mbi
ent a
ir qu
ality
sta
ndar
ds.
The
refo
re,
emiss
ions
of
CO a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith t
he P
roje
ct
wou
ld re
sult
in a
less
-than
-sig
nific
ant C
O a
ir qu
ality
impa
ct.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct A
Q-4
Gre
enho
use
Gas
Em
issio
ns
Parts
of
the
Earth
’s a
tmos
pher
e ac
t as
an
insu
latin
g bl
anke
t of
jus
t th
e rig
ht
thic
knes
s, tra
ppin
g su
ffici
ent
sola
r en
ergy
to
ke
ep
the
glob
al
aver
age
tem
pera
ture
in a
suita
ble
rang
e. T
he b
lank
et is
a c
olle
ctio
n of
atm
osph
eric
gas
es
calle
d gr
eenh
ouse
gas
es (G
HG
) bas
ed o
n th
e id
ea th
at th
e ga
ses
also
trap
hea
t lik
e th
e gl
ass
wal
ls of
a g
reen
hous
e. t
he P
roje
ct c
ompl
ies
with
all
feas
ible
and
ap
plic
able
mea
sure
s to
brin
g C
alifo
rnia
to
the
emiss
ion
redu
ctio
n ta
rget
s.
How
ever
, as
no th
resh
olds
of
signi
fican
ce p
erta
inin
g to
GH
G e
miss
ions
hav
e be
en a
dopt
ed b
y th
e To
wn
or e
stabl
ished
by
the
Stat
e, n
o de
term
inat
ion
on th
e sig
nific
ance
of t
his i
mpa
ct h
as b
een
mad
e.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
pply
. N
o de
term
inat
ion
on th
e sig
nific
ance
of t
his i
mpa
ct
has b
een
mad
e.
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-14
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Impa
ct A
Q-5
Odo
rs
Cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
cou
ld g
ener
ate
airb
orne
odo
rs a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith t
he
oper
atio
n of
con
struc
tion
vehi
cles
(e.
g., d
iese
l exh
aust)
and
the
appl
icat
ion
of
arch
itect
ural
coa
tings
. H
owev
er, t
hese
em
issio
ns w
ould
occ
ur d
urin
g da
ytim
e ho
urs o
nly
for l
imite
d pe
riods
and
wou
ld b
e re
stric
ted
to th
e im
med
iate
vic
inity
of
the
con
struc
tion
site
and
activ
ity.
The
win
d w
ould
also
ten
d to
disp
erse
od
ors,
and
such
act
iviti
es w
ould
not
affe
ct a
sub
stant
ial n
umbe
r of
peo
ple
and
wou
ld re
sult
in a
less
than
sign
ifica
nt im
pact
.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct A
Q-5
Cum
ulat
ive
Impa
cts
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re A
Q-5
The
Gre
at B
asin
Uni
fied
Air
Pollu
tion
Cont
rol D
istric
t (G
BUA
PCD
or D
istric
t) do
es n
ot h
ave
num
eric
al t
hres
hold
s to
det
erm
ine
whe
ther
the
Pro
ject
wou
ld
resu
lt in
a c
umul
ativ
ely
cons
ider
able
net
inc
reas
e of
PM
10 o
r 0 3
pre
curs
ors.
H
owev
er, a
s di
scus
sed
abov
e, 0
3 im
pact
s ar
e pr
imar
ily th
e re
sult
of p
ollu
tion
gene
rate
d in
the
San
Joa
quin
Val
ley.
Th
us,
the
cum
ulat
ive
incr
ease
of
0 3
prec
urso
r em
issio
ns a
s a
resu
lt of
con
struc
tion
and
oper
atio
n of
the
prop
osed
an
d re
late
d pr
ojec
ts w
ould
not
subs
tant
ially
con
tribu
te to
the
exce
edan
ces o
f the
St
ate
0 3 st
anda
rd a
nd, t
hus,
wou
ld n
ot b
e cu
mul
ativ
ely
cons
ider
able
.
Acc
ordi
ng t
o th
e To
wn’
s G
ener
al P
lan
Upd
ate
EIR,
the
inc
reas
es i
n PM
10
emiss
ions
ass
ocia
ted
with
bot
h co
nstru
ctio
n an
d op
erat
ion
of th
e pr
opos
ed a
nd
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
cum
ulat
ivel
y co
nsid
erab
le e
ven
with
out
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
Pro
ject
. Si
nce
the
Proj
ect’s
con
struc
tion
impa
ct w
ith re
gard
to
PM
10 e
miss
ions
wou
ld r
emai
n sig
nific
ant
and
unav
oida
ble,
the
Pro
ject
’s
cum
ulat
ive
cons
truct
ion
impa
ct o
n ai
r qu
ality
wou
ld a
lso b
e co
nsid
ered
sig
nific
ant a
nd u
navo
idab
le.
The
Proj
ect
is co
nsist
ent
with
the
AQ
MP
for
the
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes.
Th
eref
ore,
cum
ulat
ive
oper
atio
nal
impa
cts
for
the
Proj
ect
wou
ld b
e le
ss t
han
signi
fican
t.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
are
requ
ired
for
cum
ulat
ive
oper
atio
nal
impa
cts
as c
umul
ativ
e op
erat
iona
l im
pact
s wer
e de
term
ined
to b
e le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
are
avai
labl
e fo
r cu
mul
ativ
e co
nstru
ctio
n im
pact
s fo
r PM
10
emiss
ions
.
Sign
ifica
nt a
nd U
navo
idab
le
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-15
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
BIO
LOG
ICA
L R
ESO
UR
CES
(BIO
)
Impa
ct B
IO-1
a S
peci
al S
tatu
s Spe
cies
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s BIO
-1a
thro
ugh
1g
Plan
ts
Thirt
y-fiv
e sp
ecia
l-sta
tus p
lant
s wer
e ev
alua
ted
for t
heir
pote
ntia
l for
occ
urre
nce
in th
e stu
dy a
rea,
ten
of w
hich
wer
e de
term
ined
to h
ave
“med
ium
” or
“hi
gh”
pote
ntia
l for
occ
urre
nce.
Im
plem
enta
tion
of m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s rec
omm
ende
d un
der
“Im
pact
BIO
-2: S
ensit
ive
Nat
ural
Com
mun
ities
” w
ould
also
ens
ure
that
sp
ecia
l-sta
tus
plan
ts sp
ecie
s po
tent
ially
occ
urrin
g w
ithin
the
open
spa
ce w
ould
no
t be
inad
verte
ntly
impa
cted
.
The
one
rem
aini
ng s
peci
al-s
tatu
s pl
ant s
peci
es (
Mas
onic
roc
k cr
ess)
cou
ld b
e sig
nific
antly
impa
cted
by
the
Proj
ect.
Pro
ject
con
struc
tion
wou
ld r
esul
t in
the
rem
oval
of
the
maj
ority
, if
not
all,
of t
he b
asin
sag
ebru
sh p
rese
nt i
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t ar
ea.
Thi
s co
uld
resu
lt in
pot
entia
lly s
igni
fican
t im
pact
s to
M
ason
ic ro
ck c
ress
, if p
rese
nt.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-1
a w
ould
redu
ce p
oten
tial i
mpa
cts t
o th
ese
spec
ies t
o a
less
-than
-sig
nific
ant l
evel
.
Ani
mal
s
Of t
he 3
3 sp
ecia
l-sta
tus a
nim
al sp
ecie
s eva
luat
ed fo
r pot
entia
l occ
urre
nce
in th
e stu
dy a
rea,
six
wer
e de
term
ined
to
have
“m
ediu
m”
or “
high
” po
tent
ial
for
occu
rrenc
e.
Impa
cts
of t
he P
roje
ct o
n ea
ch o
f th
ese
anim
al s
peci
es a
re
addr
esse
d be
low
.
Am
phib
ians
and
Rep
tiles
Proj
ect
cons
truct
ion
coul
d re
sult
in p
oten
tially
sig
nific
ant
impa
cts
to t
he
Yos
emite
toa
d.
If pr
esen
t, co
nstru
ctio
n-re
late
d ac
tiviti
es w
ould
res
ult
in
tem
pora
ry a
nd p
erm
anen
t ha
bita
t lo
ss a
nd c
ould
pot
entia
lly r
esul
t in
dire
ct
mor
talit
y, i
njur
y, o
r ha
rass
men
t of
toa
ds,
espe
cial
ly d
urin
g th
e tim
e of
yea
r w
hen
toad
s ar
e m
ovin
g to
and
disp
ersin
g fro
m a
quat
ic h
abita
ts, a
nd d
ecre
ased
w
ater
and
hab
itat
qual
ity.
Im
plem
enta
tion
of M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-1b
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-1
a
To d
eter
min
e pr
esen
ce o
r ab
senc
e of
Mas
onic
roc
k cr
ess
in t
he d
evel
opm
ent
area
, a
qual
ified
bio
logi
st sh
all c
ondu
ct fo
cuse
d su
rvey
s ac
cord
ing
to C
DFG
gui
delin
es,
for t
his
spec
ies p
rior t
o th
e on
set o
f con
struc
tion
activ
ities
. Th
e su
rvey
s sha
ll be
con
duct
ed a
t the
pr
oper
tim
e of
yea
r whe
n th
is pl
ant i
s bo
th e
vide
nt a
nd id
entif
iabl
e. A
qua
lifie
d bi
olog
ist
is an
ind
ivid
ual
who
pos
sess
es t
he f
ollo
win
g qu
alifi
catio
ns:
1) e
xper
ienc
e co
nduc
ting
floris
tic fi
eld
surv
eys;
2) k
now
ledg
e of
pla
nt ta
xono
my
and
plan
t com
mun
ity e
colo
gy; 3
) fa
mili
arity
with
the
plan
ts of
the
area
, inc
ludi
ng ra
re, t
hrea
tene
d, a
nd e
ndan
gere
d sp
ecie
s; 4)
fam
iliar
ity w
ith t
he a
ppro
pria
te s
tate
and
fed
eral
sta
tute
s re
late
d to
pla
nts
and
plan
t co
llect
ing;
and
5)
expe
rienc
e w
ith a
naly
zing
im
pact
s of
dev
elop
men
t on
nat
ive
plan
t sp
ecie
s com
mun
ities
.
If M
ason
ic ro
ck c
ress
is n
ot fo
und
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t are
a, n
o fu
rther
miti
gatio
n w
ould
be
requ
ired.
How
ever
, if t
his
plan
t spe
cies
is lo
cate
d, th
e su
rvey
will
det
erm
ine
the
num
ber
of in
divi
dual
s pre
sent
and
the
limits
of t
he a
rea
occu
pied
by
the
popu
latio
n, a
nd o
ne o
f the
fo
llow
ing
addi
tiona
l miti
gatio
n m
easu
res s
hall
be im
plem
ente
d:
(a)
avoi
danc
e an
d pe
rman
ent p
rote
ctio
n of
the
onsit
e po
pula
tion;
(b)
perm
anen
t pr
eser
vatio
n of
an
exist
ing,
offs
ite p
opul
atio
n of
the
spe
cies
in
the
regi
on a
t a 2
:1 a
crea
ge ra
tio; o
r
(c)
trans
plan
t the
indi
vidu
als t
o pe
rman
ently
pre
serv
ed h
abita
t on-
or o
ff-sit
e at
a 1
:1
acre
age
ratio
. If
trans
plan
ted
offs
ite, t
he lo
catio
n sh
ould
pre
fera
bly
be a
djac
ent t
o th
e sit
e or
in c
lose
pro
xim
ity.
Each
add
ition
al m
itiga
tion
optio
n ab
ove
(a –
c)
shal
l in
clud
e th
e pr
epar
atio
n of
a
Pres
erva
tion
Plan
(und
er a
or b
) or a
Miti
gatio
n Pl
an (u
nder
c) b
y a
qual
ified
bio
logi
st to
be
sub
mitt
ed to
and
app
rove
d by
the
Tow
n.
The
Pres
erva
tion
or M
itiga
tion
Plan
sha
ll in
clud
e th
e lo
catio
n an
d ex
tent
of t
he p
rese
rved
or t
rans
plan
ted
indi
vidu
als
and
mea
sure
s
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-16
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
wou
ld re
duce
impa
cts r
esul
ting
from
the
Proj
ect t
o Y
osem
ite to
ad to
a le
ss-th
an-
signi
fican
t lev
el.
Bird
s
The
will
ow-a
lder
rip
aria
n co
rrido
r al
ong
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek
prov
ides
pot
entia
l br
eedi
ng a
nd n
estin
g ha
bita
t fo
r w
illow
fly
catc
hers
. Th
e ne
sting
sea
son
is a
criti
cal p
erio
d fo
r the
mai
nten
ance
of b
ird p
opul
atio
ns a
nd d
istur
banc
e ac
tiviti
es
that
cau
se b
irds
to a
band
on a
n ac
tive
nest
or d
irect
nes
t ups
et a
re c
onsid
ered
a
pote
ntia
lly s
igni
fican
t im
pact
. Im
plem
enta
tion
of M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-1c,
sc
hedu
ling
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
out
side
the
3 to
4 m
onth
bre
edin
g se
ason
(J
une
1st t
hrou
gh S
epte
mbe
r 15t
h) o
r, if
not f
easib
le, c
ondu
ctin
g pr
otoc
ol-le
vel
surv
eys,
wou
ld r
educ
e co
nstru
ctio
n-re
late
d im
pact
s to
bre
edin
g an
d ne
sting
w
illow
flyc
atch
ers t
o le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
.
The
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek
ripar
ian
corri
dor,
as
wel
l as
the
oth
er v
eget
atio
n co
mm
uniti
es i
n th
e stu
dy a
rea,
also
sup
ports
pot
entia
l br
eedi
ng a
nd n
estin
g ha
bita
t for
oth
er m
igra
tory
bird
s (e
.g.,
yello
w w
arbl
er)
and
rapt
ors
(e.g
., re
d-ta
iled
haw
k, s
harp
-shi
nned
haw
k).
Cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
, suc
h as
veg
etat
ion
clea
ring
and
grub
bing
and
gra
ding
, cou
ld h
ave
signi
fican
t im
pact
s on
bre
edin
g bi
rds
by d
estro
ying
nes
ts an
d ne
sting
hab
itat a
nd/o
r cau
sing
nest
aban
donm
ent.
Im
plem
enta
tion
of
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re
BIO
-1d
wou
ld
redu
ce
pote
ntia
lly
signi
fican
t im
pact
s to
oth
er b
reed
ing
and
nesti
ng m
igra
tory
bird
s an
d ra
ptor
s to
a
less
-than
-sig
nific
ant l
evel
.
Follo
win
g co
nstru
ctio
n, b
reed
ing
and
nesti
ng m
igra
tory
bird
s, in
clud
ing
the
will
ow f
lyca
tche
r, an
d ra
ptor
s co
uld
be d
irect
ly a
nd/o
r in
dire
ctly
impa
cted
by
incr
ease
d hu
man
-rela
ted
distu
rban
ces
indi
rect
ly
caus
ed
by
the
Proj
ect.
Im
plem
enta
tion
of M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-1e,
whi
ch i
nclu
des
good
wild
life
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
, w
ould
red
uce
pote
ntia
lly s
igni
fican
t po
st co
nstru
ctio
n im
pact
s to
a le
ss-th
an-s
igni
fican
t lev
el.
to e
nsur
e pr
otec
tion
of th
e po
pula
tion
durin
g an
d fo
llow
ing
Proj
ect i
mpl
emen
tatio
n (in
pe
rpet
uity
), in
clud
ing
a m
echa
nism
to e
nsur
e pe
rman
ent p
rese
rvat
ion
of th
e po
pula
tion
from
dev
elop
men
t suc
h as
a c
onse
rvat
ion
ease
men
t. T
he P
lan
shal
l also
incl
ude
met
hods
to
tra
nspl
ant
the
indi
vidu
als
(if a
pplic
able
), m
easu
res
to m
aint
ain
the
popu
latio
n (i.
e.,
wee
d co
ntro
l), a
nd m
etho
ds t
o m
onito
r th
e po
pula
tion
for
a m
inim
um o
f fiv
e ye
ars
follo
win
g pr
eser
vatio
n or
tran
spla
ntat
ion,
incl
udin
g pe
rform
ance
crit
eria
and
con
tinge
ncy
mea
sure
s in
case
of f
ailu
re to
mee
t the
esta
blish
ed p
erfo
rman
ce c
riter
ia.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-1
b
To a
void
sub
stant
ial a
dver
se a
ffect
s to
Yos
emite
toad
, a q
ualif
ied
biol
ogist
sha
ll co
nduc
t su
rvey
s fo
llow
ing
stand
ard
visu
al e
ncou
nter
tec
hniq
ues
supp
lem
ente
d w
ith d
ipne
tting
su
rvey
s to
con
firm
pre
senc
e or
abs
ence
of
toad
s in
the
stu
dy a
rea.
A
t m
inim
um, t
he
biol
ogist
sha
ll be
fam
iliar
with
the
disti
ngui
shin
g ph
ysic
al c
hara
cter
istic
s of
all
life
stage
s of
the
Yos
emite
toa
d an
d ot
her
amph
ibia
ns f
ound
in
the
Sier
ra N
evad
a re
gion
of
Calif
orni
a.
The
biol
ogist
sha
ll al
so h
old
all
nece
ssar
y fe
dera
l, sta
te, a
nd l
ocal
age
ncy
perm
its f
or s
urve
ying
and
han
dlin
g th
is sp
ecie
s. B
ecau
se t
he a
ctua
l tim
ing
of v
isual
en
coun
ter a
nd d
ipne
tting
sur
veys
for Y
osem
ite to
ad m
ay v
ary
depe
ndin
g pr
imar
ily o
n th
e w
ater
shed
cha
ract
erist
ics,
regi
onal
snow
pac
t, tim
ing
and
rate
of s
prin
g ru
noff,
day
leng
th,
aver
age
ambi
ent a
ir an
d w
ater
tem
pera
ture
s, an
d lo
cal a
nd s
easo
nal w
eath
er c
ondi
tions
, th
e bi
olog
ist sh
all v
isit n
earb
y ac
cess
ible
occ
urre
nces
of Y
osem
ite to
ad (r
efer
ence
site
s) to
id
entif
y th
e br
eedi
ng p
erio
d in
the
vici
nity
of
the
Proj
ect s
ite.
The
biol
ogist
sha
ll th
en
cond
uct
at l
east
one
to t
wo
visu
al e
ncou
nter
sur
veys
fro
m M
ay t
hrou
gh J
uly
at t
he
appr
opria
te ti
me
of d
ay to
det
erm
ine
pres
ence
or
abse
nce
of to
ads
onsit
e.
If du
ring
the
initi
al b
reed
ing
surv
ey,
no i
ndiv
idua
l Y
osem
ite t
oads
or
egg
mas
ses
are
enco
unte
red,
su
bseq
uent
sur
veys
sha
ll be
con
duct
ed tw
o to
fou
r w
eeks
late
r. A
ppro
xim
atel
y fo
ur to
ei
ght w
eeks
afte
r com
plet
ing
the
bree
ding
sur
vey(
s), d
ipne
tting
sur
veys
for t
adpo
les
shal
l be
con
duct
ed (u
sual
ly Ju
ly th
roug
h A
ugus
t).
If no
indi
vidu
al to
ads
(e.g
., ad
ults
or ta
dpol
es) o
r egg
mas
ses
are
enco
unte
red,
no
furth
er
miti
gatio
n w
ould
be
requ
ired.
H
owev
er, i
f Y
osem
ite to
ad is
enc
ount
ered
the
follo
win
g
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-17
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Mam
mal
s
Sier
ra N
evad
a M
ount
ain
Beav
er a
nd M
ount
Lye
ll Sh
rew
Goo
d w
ildlif
e m
anag
emen
t pr
actic
es s
uch
as t
hose
out
lined
in
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-1
e w
ould
also
red
uce
post-
cons
truct
ion
impa
cts
to t
he S
ierra
N
evad
a M
ount
ain
Beav
er a
nd M
ount
Lye
ll sh
rew
to le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
.
Wes
tern
Whi
te-T
aile
d Ja
ckra
bbit
The
noise
and
vib
ratio
ns f
rom
con
struc
tion
equi
pmen
t ass
ocia
ted
with
Pro
ject
co
nstru
ctio
n an
d ot
her
cons
truct
ion-
rela
ted
activ
ities
(e.
g.,
incr
ease
d hu
man
ac
tiviti
es, f
oot a
nd v
ehic
le tr
affic
) wou
ld li
kely
cre
ate
distu
rban
ce th
at sh
ould
be
suffi
cien
t to
caus
e ju
veni
le a
nd a
dult
hare
s oc
curri
ng w
ithin
the
deve
lopm
ent
area
to
mov
e aw
ay f
rom
the
con
struc
tion
area
. Th
is w
ould
be
cons
ider
ed a
sig
nific
ant
impa
ct.
Im
plem
enta
tion
of
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re
BIO
-1f,
pre-
cons
truct
ion
surv
eys,
wou
ld re
duce
impa
cts t
o w
hite
-taile
d ja
ckra
bbits
to a
less
-th
an-s
igni
fican
t lev
el.
Am
eric
an B
adge
r
Veg
etat
ion
com
mun
ities
eas
t of
the
exi
sting
gol
f co
urse
and
nor
th o
f O
ld
Mam
mot
h R
oad
prov
ide
pote
ntia
l hab
itat f
or th
e A
mer
ican
bad
ger.
Thi
s wou
ld
be a
pot
entia
lly si
gnifi
cant
impa
ct.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-
1g, p
re-c
onstr
uctio
n su
rvey
s, w
ould
red
uce
the
pote
ntia
l los
s of
act
ive
badg
er
burro
ws a
nd/o
r ind
ivid
ual b
adge
rs to
less
than
sign
ifica
nt.
mea
sure
s sha
ll be
impl
emen
ted:
• A
qua
lifie
d bi
olog
ist s
hall
deve
lop
and
impl
emen
t, in
coo
rdin
atio
n w
ith t
he
USF
WS,
CD
FG, a
nd U
SFS,
an
excl
usio
n an
d re
loca
tion
prog
ram
for
Yos
emite
to
ads
with
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t are
a. T
he d
esig
n an
d ty
pe o
f exc
lusio
n fe
ncin
g, a
s w
ell a
s th
e m
etho
d an
d lo
catio
n of
relo
catio
n sh
all b
e ap
prov
ed b
y th
e re
sour
ce
agen
cies
prio
r to
impl
emen
tatio
n.
• Pr
e-co
nstru
ctio
n su
rvey
s of
aqu
atic
hab
itats
and
adja
cent
terre
stria
l hab
itat s
hall
be c
ondu
cted
in
all
wor
k ar
ea b
y qu
alifi
ed b
iolo
gist
with
in t
wo
wee
ks o
f in
itiat
ing
wor
k.
Any
obs
erve
d to
ads
shal
l be
relo
cate
d ac
cord
ing
to p
roce
dure
s ou
tline
d in
the
exc
lusio
n an
d re
loca
tion
prog
ram
dev
elop
ed a
nd i
mpl
emen
ted
abov
e.
Act
ive
wor
k ar
eas
shal
l be
re-
surv
eyed
reg
ular
ly b
etw
een
May
and
Se
ptem
ber.
• D
urin
g co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es, a
ll tra
sh th
at m
ay a
ttrac
t pre
dato
rs w
ill b
e pr
oper
ly
cont
aine
d, r
emov
ed f
rom
the
wor
k ar
ea, a
nd d
ispos
ed o
f re
gula
rly.
Follo
win
g Pr
ojec
t co
nstru
ctio
n, a
ll tra
sh a
nd c
onstr
uctio
n de
bris
shal
l be
rem
oved
fro
m
wor
k ar
eas.
• A
ny fu
elin
g an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
f veh
icle
s an
d ot
her e
quip
men
t and
sta
ging
are
as
shal
l be
at
leas
t 65
ft
(20
m)
from
any
will
ow-a
lder
rip
aria
n co
mm
unity
or
wat
erbo
dy.
• A
ppro
pria
te s
edim
ent
and
eros
ion
cont
rol
best
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
(B
MPs
) sh
all b
e im
plem
ente
d to
pro
tect
the
wat
er q
ualit
y of
the
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek
and
the
seve
ral
pond
s ne
ar M
amm
oth
Cree
k, a
s w
ell
as t
he g
olf
cour
se p
onds
and
as
soci
ated
dra
inag
es.
BMPs
to b
e im
plem
ente
d sh
all b
e de
scrib
ed in
the
Proj
ect
site’
s sto
rmw
ater
pol
lutio
n pr
even
tion
plan
(SW
PPP)
and
sha
ll be
ins
talle
d ac
cord
ing
to th
e m
anuf
actu
re’s
spec
ifica
tions
.
• A
reas
tem
pora
rily
distu
rbed
by
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
sha
ll be
rec
onto
ured
and
re
vege
tate
d. A
n ap
prop
riate
ass
embl
age
of v
eget
atio
n th
at is
suita
ble
for t
he a
rea
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-18
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
shal
l be
used
dur
ing
resto
ratio
n ef
forts
.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-1
c
To a
void
sub
stant
ial a
dver
se a
ffect
s to
nes
ting
will
ow fl
ycat
cher
s, co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es,
incl
udin
g ve
geta
tion
clea
ring
and
grub
bing
and
gra
ding
, on
the
porti
on o
f the
dev
elop
men
t ar
ea n
orth
of O
ld M
amm
oth
Roa
d sh
all b
e co
nduc
ted
outsi
de o
f the
nes
ting
seas
on (J
une
1st t
hrou
gh S
epte
mbe
r 15t
h).
If th
is is
not f
easib
le, t
hen
a qu
alifi
ed b
iolo
gist
hold
ing
all
nece
ssar
y fe
dera
l, sta
te,
and
agen
cy p
erm
its s
hall
cond
uct
prot
ocol
-leve
l su
rvey
s fo
r w
illow
fly
catc
hers
fol
low
ing
met
hods
out
lined
in A
Will
ow F
lyca
tche
r Su
rvey
Pro
toco
l fo
r Cal
iforn
ia t
o co
nfirm
pre
senc
e or
abs
ence
in th
e stu
dy a
rea.
A q
ualif
ied
biol
ogist
is
an
indi
vidu
al
who
ha
s su
ffici
ent
know
ledg
e,
train
ing,
an
d ex
perie
nce
with
bi
rd
iden
tific
atio
n an
d su
rvey
s to
disti
ngui
sh th
e w
illow
flyc
atch
er fr
om o
ther
non
-Em
pido
nax
spec
ies,
and
reco
gniz
e th
e w
illow
fly
catc
her’s
prim
ary
song
. A
lso,
it is
stron
gly
reco
mm
ende
d th
at t
he b
iolo
gist
has
atte
nded
a w
illow
fly
catc
her
surv
ey t
rain
ing
wor
ksho
p. T
he p
roto
col i
s bas
ed o
n th
e us
e of
repe
ated
tape
-pla
ybac
k su
rvey
s dur
ing
pre-
dete
rmin
ed p
erio
ds o
f the
bre
edin
g se
ason
: Sur
vey
Perio
d 1:
Jun
e 1s
t thr
ough
Jun
e 14
th;
Surv
ey P
erio
d 2;
Jun
e 15
th th
roug
h Ju
ne 2
5th;
and
Sur
vey
Perio
d 3:
Jun
e 26
th th
roug
h Ju
ly 1
5th.
It r
equi
res
a m
inim
um o
f tw
o su
rvey
s on
the
site,
one
dur
ing
Surv
ey P
erio
d 2
and
one
durin
g ei
ther
Sur
vey
Perio
d 1,
or
Surv
ey P
erio
d 3
to d
ocum
ent
pres
ence
or
abse
nce
of w
illow
fly
catc
hers
dur
ing
the
surv
ey y
ear.
In
addi
tion,
suc
cess
ive
surv
eys
mus
t be
at le
ast f
ive
days
apa
rt; su
rvey
s don
e fe
wer
than
5 d
ays a
part
are
not c
onsid
ered
to
be in
sepa
rate
surv
ey p
erio
ds.
If no
will
ow f
lyca
tche
rs a
re d
etec
ted
in th
e stu
dy a
rea,
no
furth
er m
itiga
tion
wou
ld b
e re
quire
d.
How
ever
, if
will
ow f
lyca
tche
r is
dete
cted
, the
CD
FG s
hall
be c
onta
cted
for
a
final
disc
ussio
n on
the
pos
sibili
ty o
f do
ing
cons
truct
ion-
rela
ted
activ
ities
dur
ing
the
bree
ding
seas
on.
Also
, in
coor
dina
tion
with
the
CD
FG, a
long
-term
(i.e
., gr
eate
r tha
n fiv
e ye
ar)
mon
itorin
g pr
ogra
m s
hall
be d
evel
oped
and
im
plem
ente
d in
ord
er t
o pr
otec
t th
e ex
istin
g po
pula
tion
and
prov
ide
base
line
data
to
m
ake
wel
l-inf
orm
ed,
adap
tabl
e m
anag
emen
t pla
ns, i
f nee
ded
in th
e fu
ture
. Re
gard
less
of w
heth
er o
r not
flyc
atch
ers
are
dete
cted
, the
will
ow f
lyca
tche
r su
rvey
for
ms
(For
m 1
; Will
ow F
lyca
tche
r Fi
eld
Surv
ey
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-19
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Form
, Fo
rm 2
; W
illow
Fly
catc
her
Surv
ey S
umm
ary-
Site
Des
crip
tion,
and
For
m 3
: W
illow
Fly
catc
her S
urve
y Su
mm
ary-
Resu
lts S
umm
ary)
sha
ll be
sub
mitt
ed to
the
CDFG
by
Oct
ober
1st
of e
ach
year
.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-1
d
To a
void
sub
stant
ial a
dver
se a
ffect
s to
oth
er n
estin
g m
igra
tory
bird
s an
d ra
ptor
s, on
e of
th
e fo
llow
ing
mea
sure
s sha
ll be
impl
emen
ted:
• Co
nduc
t ve
geta
tion
rem
oval
and
oth
er g
roun
d di
sturb
ance
act
iviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith P
roje
ct c
onstr
uctio
n du
ring
the
non-
bree
ding
sea
son
(Sep
tem
ber
16th
th
roug
h M
arch
14t
h); O
R
• Co
nduc
t pre
-con
struc
tion
surv
eys f
or n
estin
g bi
rds i
f con
struc
tion
activ
ities
are
to
take
pla
ce d
urin
g th
e ne
sting
seas
on (M
arch
15t
h th
roug
h Se
ptem
ber 1
5th)
. Pr
e-co
nstru
ctio
n su
rvey
s sh
all b
e co
nduc
ted
by a
qua
lifie
d bi
olog
ist o
nce
per
wee
k fo
r ei
ght c
onse
cutiv
e w
eeks
at t
he a
ppro
pria
te ti
me
of d
ay d
urin
g th
e br
eedi
ng
seas
on a
nd s
hall
end
no m
ore
than
thre
e da
ys p
rior
to th
e on
set o
f co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es to
con
firm
pre
senc
e or
abs
ence
of a
ctiv
e ne
sts in
the
Proj
ect v
icin
ity (a
t le
ast
300
feet
aro
und
the
deve
lopm
ent
area
). I
f ac
tive
nests
are
enc
ount
ered
, sp
ecie
s-sp
ecifi
c m
easu
res
shal
l be
pr
epar
ed
by
a qu
alifi
ed
biol
ogist
, in
co
ordi
natio
n w
ith th
e C
DFG
and
oth
er a
ppro
pria
te a
genc
ies,
and
impl
emen
ted
to
prev
ent
dire
ct
loss
or
ab
ando
nmen
t of
th
e ac
tive
nest.
A
t a
min
imum
, co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es i
n th
e vi
cini
ty o
f ne
st sh
all
be d
efer
red
until
the
you
ng
have
fle
dged
and
an
excl
usio
n bu
ffer
zone
sha
ll be
esta
blish
ed.
A m
inim
um
excl
usio
n bu
ffer
of 2
5 fe
et i
s ty
pica
lly r
ecom
men
ded
by C
DFG
for
son
gbird
ne
sts, a
nd 2
00 to
500
feet
for r
apto
r nes
ts, d
epen
ding
on
the
spec
ies a
nd lo
catio
n.
The
perim
eter
of t
he n
est-s
etba
ck z
one
shal
l be
fenc
ed o
r ade
quat
ely
dem
arca
ted
with
sta
ked
flagg
ing
at 2
0-fo
ot i
nter
vals,
and
con
struc
tion
pers
onne
l re
stric
ted
from
the
area
. A
surv
ey re
port
by th
e qu
alifi
ed b
iolo
gist
verif
ying
that
the
youn
g ha
ve fl
edge
d sh
all b
e su
bmitt
ed to
the
Tow
n fo
r rev
iew
and
con
curre
nce
prio
r to
initi
atio
n of
con
struc
tion
activ
ities
with
in t
he n
est-s
et-b
ack
zone
. T
he s
urve
y
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-20
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
repo
rt sh
all a
lso b
e su
bmitt
ed to
the
CDFG
for r
evie
w.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-1
e
The
follo
win
g go
od w
ildlif
e m
anag
emen
t pr
actic
es s
hall
be i
mpl
emen
ted
to r
educ
e im
pact
s to
nesti
ng m
igra
tory
bird
s and
rapt
ors,
as w
ell a
s oth
er w
ildlif
e sp
ecie
s, fo
llow
ing
Proj
ect d
evel
opm
ent.
• D
omes
tic p
ets b
elon
ging
to re
siden
ts or
visi
tors
shal
l be
proh
ibite
d fro
m e
nter
ing
the
adja
cent
und
evel
oped
land
s or o
pen
spac
e ar
eas.
Sig
nage
shal
l be
poste
d an
d m
aint
aine
d al
ong
the
boun
darie
s of
the
dev
elop
men
t ar
ea i
ndic
atin
g su
ch
proh
ibiti
ons
and
educ
atin
g th
e co
mm
unity
abo
ut d
omes
tic p
ets
as a
con
serv
atio
n th
reat
to b
irds a
nd o
ther
wild
life.
• Si
gnag
e sh
all b
e in
stalle
d al
ong
the
exist
ing
natu
re tr
ails
on th
e Pr
ojec
t par
cel
north
of
Old
Mam
mot
h R
oad
educ
atin
g th
e co
mm
unity
abo
ut t
he b
reed
ing
seas
on b
eing
a v
ital p
erio
d in
bird
s’ a
nd o
ther
ani
mal
s’ li
ves
and
distu
rban
ces
durin
g th
is tim
e m
ay re
sult
in n
est o
r you
ng a
band
onm
ent.
• Ed
ucat
iona
l bro
chur
es s
hall
be d
istrib
uted
to re
siden
ts an
d vi
sitor
s di
scus
sing
the
impo
rtanc
e of
not
sup
plem
entin
g th
e di
et o
f av
ian
nest
pred
ator
s su
ch a
s ja
ys
(Cya
noci
tta s
p.),
mag
pie
(Pic
a sp
.), r
aven
s (C
orvu
s co
rax)
, and
bro
wn-
head
ed
cow
bird
(M
olot
hrus
ate
r) by
fee
ding
the
m d
urin
g th
e br
eedi
ng s
easo
n.
Also
, ed
ucat
iona
l bro
chur
es s
hall
instr
uct r
esid
ents
and
visit
ors
not t
o fe
ed w
ildlif
e or
al
low
wild
life
acce
ss to
tras
h.
This
coul
d le
ad to
incr
ease
d na
tura
l mam
mal
ian
pred
ator
s su
ch a
s ra
ccoo
n, fo
x (V
ulpe
s sp
.), a
nd o
poss
um (D
idel
phis
virg
inia
na).
Th
ese
pred
ator
s te
nd to
ben
efit
disp
ropo
rtion
atel
y fro
m h
uman
hab
itatio
n, a
nd a
s th
eir p
opul
atio
ns e
xpan
d th
ey a
re n
egat
ivel
y af
fect
ing
the
heal
th o
f bird
and
oth
er
anim
al p
opul
atio
ns.
• N
ight
lig
htin
g as
soci
ated
w
ith
the
Proj
ect
shal
l be
de
signe
d to
pr
ovid
e ill
umin
atio
n of
tar
get
area
s w
ith m
inim
al o
ffsite
visi
bilit
y to
avo
id p
oten
tially
ill
umin
atin
g w
ildlif
e us
e ar
eas
loca
ted
with
in a
nd a
djac
ent t
o th
e de
velo
pmen
t ar
ea.
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-21
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-1
f
To a
void
sub
stant
ial
adve
rse
affe
cts
to w
este
rn w
hite
-taile
d ja
ckra
bbit,
one
of
the
follo
win
g m
easu
res s
hall
be im
plem
ente
d:
• Co
nduc
t ve
geta
tion
rem
oval
and
oth
er g
roun
d di
sturb
ance
act
iviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith P
roje
ct c
onstr
uctio
n du
ring
the
non-
bree
ding
sea
son
(Aug
ust
1st
thro
ugh
Janu
ary
31st)
; OR
• Co
nduc
t pr
e-co
nstru
ctio
n su
rvey
s fo
r w
este
rn
whi
te-ta
iled
jack
rabb
it if
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
are
to ta
ke p
lace
dur
ing
the
bree
ding
sea
son
(Feb
ruar
y 1s
t th
roug
h Ju
ly 3
1st).
Pr
e-co
nstru
ctio
n su
rvey
s sh
all b
e co
nduc
ted
by a
bio
logi
st fa
mili
ar w
ith th
is ha
res’
hab
itat a
nd s
ign
(e.g
., tra
cks,
pelle
ts) o
nce
per w
eek
for
five
cons
ecut
ive
wee
ks a
nd sh
all e
nd n
o m
ore
than
thre
e da
ys p
rior t
o th
e on
set o
f co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es t
o co
nfirm
pre
senc
e or
abs
ence
of
hare
s w
ithin
the
Pr
ojec
t’s d
evel
opm
ent
area
. I
f ha
res
or e
vide
nce
of h
are
is en
coun
tere
d, t
he
qual
ified
bio
logi
st, in
coo
rdin
atio
n w
ith th
e CD
FG, s
hall
deve
lop
and
impl
emen
t sit
e-sp
ecifi
c m
easu
res
(e.g
., ex
clus
ion
buffe
r zo
ne, n
estin
g m
onito
ring)
to a
void
lo
ss o
f ne
sts o
r yo
ung.
A
sur
vey
repo
rt by
the
qual
ified
bio
logi
st ve
rifyi
ng th
e pr
esen
ce o
r ab
senc
e of
wes
tern
whi
te-ta
iled
jack
rabb
it an
d de
scrib
ing
mea
sure
s de
velo
ped
and
impl
emen
ted
to a
void
har
es,
if de
term
ined
pre
sent
, sh
all
be
subm
itted
to
the
Tow
n fo
r re
view
and
con
curre
nce
prio
r to
ini
tiatio
n of
co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-1
g
To a
void
subs
tant
ial a
dver
se e
ffect
s to
badg
ers,
a qu
alifi
ed w
ildlif
e bi
olog
ist sh
all c
ondu
ct
an i
nitia
l su
rvey
for
act
ive
burro
ws
at l
east
30 d
ays
prio
r to
ini
tiatio
n of
con
struc
tion
activ
ities
to c
onfir
m p
rese
nce
or a
bsen
ce o
f bad
ger i
n th
e pr
ojec
t vic
inity
(at l
east
150
feet
ar
ound
the
dev
elop
men
t fo
otpr
int).
If
no i
ndiv
idua
l ba
dger
s or
evi
denc
e of
bad
ger
is fo
und,
no
furth
er m
itiga
tion
wou
ld b
e re
quire
d at
thi
s tim
e.
How
ever
, if
badg
er i
s de
tect
ed, s
ite-s
peci
fic m
easu
res
(e.g
., ex
clus
ion
buffe
r zon
e, n
estin
g m
onito
ring)
sha
ll be
pr
epar
ed b
y a
qual
ified
bio
logi
st, in
coo
rdin
atio
n w
ith th
e C
DFG
and
oth
er a
genc
ies
as
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-22
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
appr
opria
te, a
nd im
plem
ente
d to
pre
vent
dire
ct lo
ss o
f act
ive
burro
ws
and/
or in
divi
dual
s.
Rega
rdle
ss o
f whe
ther
bad
ger i
s det
ecte
d du
ring
the
initi
al su
rvey
, a su
bseq
uent
surv
ey fo
r ba
dger
in th
e Pr
ojec
t vic
inity
shal
l be
cond
ucte
d no
mor
e th
an 3
day
s prio
r to
the
initi
atio
n of
con
struc
tion
activ
ities
to c
onfir
m n
o ne
w b
urro
ws
have
esta
blish
ed in
the
inte
rven
ing
perio
d.
A s
urve
y re
port
by t
he q
ualif
ied
biol
ogist
ver
ifyin
g th
at t
here
are
no
activ
e bu
rrow
s pr
esen
t in
the
deve
lopm
ent f
ootp
rint s
hall
be s
ubm
itted
to th
e To
wn
for r
evie
w
and
conc
urre
nce
prio
r to
initi
atio
n of
con
struc
tion
activ
ities
. Th
e su
rvey
repo
rt sh
all a
lso
be su
bmitt
ed to
the
CDFG
for r
evie
w.
Impa
ct B
IO-2
Sen
sitiv
e N
atur
al C
omm
uniti
es
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res B
IO-2
a th
roug
h 2b
Ripa
rian
habi
tat i
s pr
esen
t in
the
study
are
a al
ong
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek;
how
ever
, th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld n
ot re
sult
in d
irect
impa
cts
(e.g
., re
mov
al o
r dam
age)
of t
his
vege
tatio
n co
mm
unity
, and
wou
ld in
stead
pre
serv
e th
is co
mm
unity
, as
wel
l as
the
adja
cent
wet
mea
dow
, as
ope
n sp
ace.
Im
plem
enta
tion
of M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-2a
wou
ld re
duce
this
pote
ntia
l im
pact
to le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
.
Dev
elop
men
t of
the
Pro
ject
cou
ld a
lso a
ffect
the
rip
aria
n an
d w
et m
eado
w
com
mun
ities
, as w
ell a
s the
oth
er n
atur
al c
omm
uniti
es, p
rese
nt in
the
vici
nity
by
indi
rect
ly in
trodu
cing
non
-nat
ive
plan
t spe
cies
into
thes
e ar
eas.
The
effe
cts
of
this
impa
ct w
ould
be
min
imiz
ed b
y im
plem
enta
tion
of M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-2b
.
Pote
ntia
l jur
isdic
tiona
l wat
ers
and
wet
land
s ar
e pr
esen
t in
the
study
are
a, w
hich
ar
e co
nsid
ered
sen
sitiv
e; h
owev
er, t
hese
fea
ture
s ar
e ad
dres
sed
unde
r “I
mpa
ct
Bio-
3: Ju
risdi
ctio
nal R
esou
rces
” be
low
.
Whi
le t
he o
ther
veg
etat
ion
com
mun
ities
pre
sent
in
the
study
are
a ar
e no
t co
nsid
ered
sen
sitiv
e, th
ey c
onta
in s
ome
trees
that
mee
t the
min
imum
siz
e (s
ix
inch
es in
dia
met
er) t
o re
quire
app
rova
l fro
m th
e To
wn
prio
r to
rem
oval
; im
pact
s to
the
se t
rees
are
add
ress
ed u
nder
“Im
pact
Bio
-5:
Conf
orm
ance
with
Tow
n Po
licie
s and
Ord
inan
ces”
bel
ow.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-2
a
To a
void
pot
entia
l ina
dver
tent
impa
cts t
o pr
eser
ved
sens
itive
hab
itats
(ripa
rian
habi
tat,
wet
m
eado
w, o
r oth
er ju
risdi
ctio
nal f
eatu
res)
adj
acen
t to
the
deve
lopm
ent a
rea,
the
follo
win
g m
easu
res s
hall
be im
plem
ente
d pr
ior t
o an
d du
ring
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
:
• Pr
ior
to c
onstr
uctio
n ac
tiviti
es, t
he b
ound
arie
s of
sen
sitiv
e ha
bita
ts th
at w
ill n
ot
be i
mpa
cted
sha
ll be
plo
tted
on a
ll co
nstru
ctio
n pl
ans
and
map
s, in
clud
ing
a m
inim
um b
uffe
r of 1
0 fe
et o
r mor
e as
det
erm
ined
by
a qu
alifi
ed b
iolo
gist.
• Si
lt fe
ncin
g an
d co
nstru
ctio
n fe
ncin
g (o
r fla
ggin
g to
mak
e th
e sil
t fen
cing
mor
e vi
sible
) sh
all b
e in
stalle
d ar
ound
the
sen
sitiv
e ha
bita
t and
buf
fer,
and
the
final
lo
catio
n of
the
insta
lled
fenc
ing
shal
l be
appr
oved
by
a qu
alifi
ed b
iolo
gist
prio
r to
initi
atio
n of
con
struc
tion
activ
ities
.
• En
croa
chm
ent
into
the
sen
sitiv
e ha
bita
t an
d bu
ffer
shal
l be
pro
hibi
ted
by
cons
truct
ion
pers
onne
l, an
d sto
rage
of m
ater
ials
or e
quip
men
t sha
ll be
pro
hibi
ted
in th
is ar
ea.
• Pr
ior
to t
he o
nset
of
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
, co
nstru
ctio
n pe
rson
nel
shal
l be
br
iefe
d on
the
loc
atio
n of
sen
sitiv
e ha
bita
t an
d ot
her
reso
urce
s th
at s
hall
be
pers
ever
ed a
nd th
e im
porta
nce
of a
void
ance
.
• Th
e sil
t fen
ce sh
all b
e m
onito
red
regu
larly
dur
ing
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
to e
nsur
e
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-23
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
that
the
fen
cing
rem
ains
int
act
and
func
tiona
l, an
d th
at n
o en
croa
chm
ent
has
occu
rred
into
the
sen
sitiv
e ha
bita
t or
bou
ndar
y; a
ny r
epai
rs t
o th
e fe
nce
or
encr
oach
men
t cor
rect
ion
shal
l be
cond
ucte
d im
med
iate
ly.
A m
emo
sum
mar
izin
g m
onito
ring
date
s, ob
serv
atio
ns,
and
repa
irs/c
orre
ctio
ns
shal
l be
pr
epar
ed
follo
win
g ea
ch c
onstr
uctio
n se
ason
and
subm
itted
to th
e To
wn.
• A
ppro
pria
te s
edim
ent
and
eros
ion
cont
rol
best
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
(B
MPs
) sh
all b
e im
plem
ente
d to
pro
tect
wat
er q
ualit
y of
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek
and
its a
djac
ent
wet
mea
dow
com
mun
ity d
urin
g an
d fo
llow
ing
proj
ect c
onstr
uctio
n. T
he B
MPs
to
be
im
plem
ente
d sh
all
be
desc
ribed
in
th
e sit
e’s
storm
wat
er
pollu
tion
prev
entio
n pl
an (S
WPP
P) a
nd s
hall
be in
stalle
d ac
cord
ing
to th
e m
anuf
actu
rer’s
sp
ecifi
catio
ns.
• A
ll fu
elin
g an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
f ve
hicl
es a
nd o
ther
equ
ipm
ent a
nd s
tagi
ng a
reas
sh
all b
e at
leas
t 50
ft (1
5 m
) fro
m se
nsiti
ve h
abita
ts.
• M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-2b
• To
min
imiz
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f inv
asiv
e, n
on-n
ativ
e pl
ant s
peci
es o
n th
e sit
e, th
e fo
llow
ing
mea
sure
s sha
ll be
impl
emen
ted.
• A
con
struc
tion
sche
dule
sha
ll be
dev
elop
ed to
clo
sely
coo
rdin
ate
activ
ities
suc
h as
cle
arin
g, g
radi
ng, a
nd re
seed
ing,
to e
nsur
e ar
eas
are
not p
rem
atur
ely
strip
ped
of n
ativ
e ve
geta
tion
and
reve
geta
tion
activ
ities
be
cond
ucte
d as
soo
n as
pos
sible
fo
llow
ing
deve
lopm
ent.
• V
eget
atio
n di
sturb
ance
s sh
all b
e lim
ited
to th
ose
area
s id
entif
ied
on c
onstr
uctio
n pl
ans a
nd m
aps a
s sla
ted
for d
evel
opm
ent o
r con
struc
tion
stagi
ng.
• N
ativ
e an
d co
mpa
tible
non
-nat
ive
plan
t sp
ecie
s, es
peci
ally
dro
ught
res
istan
t sp
ecie
s, sh
all b
e us
ed fo
r rev
eget
atio
n. R
efer
to th
e lis
t of P
lant
s th
at T
hriv
e in
Ea
stern
Sie
rra G
arde
ns’ p
repa
red
by M
ono
Cou
nty.
• La
ndsc
apin
g w
ill n
ot u
se i
nvas
ive
non-
nativ
e pl
ants
that
thr
eate
n w
ildla
nds
acco
rdin
g to
the
Cal
iforn
ia I
nvas
ive
Plan
t In
vent
ory
mad
e av
aila
ble
by t
he
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-24
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Calif
orni
a In
vasiv
e Pl
ant C
ounc
il (C
al-IP
C).
• Er
osio
n an
d se
dim
ent c
ontro
l mat
eria
ls sh
all b
e ce
rtifie
d as
wee
d-fre
e.
Impa
ct B
IO-3
Jur
isdic
tiona
l Res
ourc
es
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-3
Juris
dict
iona
l wat
ers
of th
e U
nite
d St
ates
, inc
ludi
ng w
etla
nds,
and
wat
ers
of th
e St
ate,
are
pre
sent
in M
amm
oth
Cree
k, it
s tri
buta
ries,
seve
ral o
pen
wat
er p
onds
an
d in
the
adj
acen
t w
et m
eado
w c
omm
unity
in
the
study
are
a no
rth o
f O
ld
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad.
Alth
ough
no
dire
ct im
pact
s w
ould
occ
ur in
thes
e ar
eas
from
th
e Pr
ojec
t, as
the
area
nor
th o
f th
e de
velo
pmen
t are
a w
ould
be
pres
erve
d as
op
en s
pace
, ind
irect
impa
cts
coul
d oc
cur
from
adj
acen
t con
struc
tion
activ
ities
su
ch a
s in
adve
rtent
dam
age
from
equ
ipm
ent
or v
ehic
le s
tagi
ng,
or e
rosio
n.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-2
a ab
ove
wou
ld r
educ
e th
is
pote
ntia
l im
pact
to a
less
-than
-sig
nific
ant l
evel
.
The
exist
ing
golf
cour
se p
onds
wes
t of
Fairw
ay D
rive
and
the
dra
inag
es a
nd
ditc
hes
that
con
nect
the
m a
re n
ot c
onsid
ered
fed
eral
ly j
urisd
ictio
nal
feat
ures
; ho
wev
er, t
hese
are
as m
ay b
e co
nsid
ered
wat
ers o
f the
Sta
te su
bjec
t to
regu
latio
n by
the
RW
QC
B, a
nd m
ay b
e co
nsid
ered
lak
es o
r str
eam
beds
sub
ject
to
regu
latio
n by
CD
FG.
How
ever
, sim
ilar
to th
e ot
her
wat
ers
in th
e stu
dy a
rea
north
of O
ld M
amm
oth
Roa
d, th
ese
feat
ures
are
not
loca
ted
with
in th
e Pr
ojec
t’s
deve
lopm
ent
area
, and
im
plem
enta
tion
of M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-2a
wou
ld
redu
ce a
ny p
oten
tial
indi
rect
im
pact
s re
sulti
ng f
rom
con
struc
tion
activ
ities
to
less
than
sign
ifica
nt.
The
exist
ing
golf
cour
se p
ond,
the
nor
ther
nmos
t re
tent
ion
basin
, an
d th
e dr
aina
ge/d
itch
conn
ectin
g th
ese
feat
ures
loca
ted
sout
h O
ld M
amm
oth
Road
and
ea
st of
Fai
rway
Driv
e ar
e al
so p
oten
tially
sub
ject
to re
gula
tion
by th
e R
WQ
CB
and
CDFG
(bu
t are
not
con
sider
ed to
be
fede
rally
juris
dict
iona
l).
The
Proj
ect
wou
ld r
esul
t in
red
ucin
g th
e sto
rmw
ater
ret
entio
n of
the
exi
sting
gol
f co
urse
po
nd (
i.e.,
low
erin
g th
e sp
illw
ay a
t the
eas
tern
end
of
the
pond
) an
d re
plac
ing
the
dete
ntio
n ba
sin a
nd d
rain
age/
ditc
h w
ith a
ser
ies
of u
nlin
ed s
torm
wat
er
Prio
r to
the
ons
et o
f co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es,
incl
udin
g co
ncre
te a
nd r
ipra
p re
mov
al
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
e re
duct
ion
of th
e sto
rmw
ater
rete
ntio
n in
the
exist
ing
golf
cour
se p
ond,
an
d ve
geta
tion
clea
ring
and
grub
bing
and
gra
ding
ass
ocia
ted
with
the
cre
atio
n of
the
sto
rmw
ater
con
trol b
asin
s an
d ve
geta
tive
swal
e, a
Was
te D
ischa
rge
Requ
irem
ent (
WD
R)
perm
it ap
plic
atio
n sh
all
be s
ubm
itted
to
RWQ
CB
and
a L
ake
or S
tream
bed
Alte
ratio
n N
otifi
catio
n sh
all b
e su
bmitt
ed to
CD
FG fo
r im
pact
s to
the
exist
ing
golf
cour
se p
ond,
the
north
ernm
ost r
eten
tion
basin
, and
the
drai
nage
/ditc
h co
nnec
ting
thes
e fe
atur
es.
Miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
asso
ciat
ed w
ith p
erm
its m
ay i
nclu
de i
mpa
ct m
inim
izat
ion
mea
sure
s su
ch a
s im
plem
enta
tion
of
best
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
(i.
e.,
eros
ion
and
sedi
men
t co
ntro
l m
easu
res)
and
sea
sona
l w
ork
restr
ictio
ns, a
nd p
ossib
ly h
abita
t co
mpe
nsat
ion
mea
sure
s su
ch a
s th
e re
stora
tion
plan
tings
in
the
vici
nity
. I
mpa
cts
to p
oten
tially
jur
isdic
tiona
l fe
atur
es s
hall
not
occu
r un
til t
he p
erm
its a
re r
ecei
ved
from
the
app
ropr
iate
reg
ulat
ory
agen
cies
, or c
orre
spon
denc
e is
rece
ived
from
the
agen
cies
indi
catin
g th
at a
per
mit
is no
t re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-25
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
cont
rol b
asin
s and
a v
eget
ativ
e sw
ale
(refe
r to
App
endi
x G
, Dra
ft EI
R Te
chni
cal
App
endi
ces,
Hyd
rolo
gy D
ata)
. Im
pact
s to
thes
e fe
atur
es w
ould
be
redu
ced
to
less
than
sign
ifica
nt w
ith im
plem
enta
tion
of M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-3.
Impa
ct B
IO-4
W
ildlif
e m
ovem
ent,
mig
ratio
n co
rrid
ors,
and
nativ
e wi
ldlif
e nu
rser
ies
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-4
a th
roug
h 4c
App
roxi
mat
ely
46 a
cres
of t
he S
herw
in h
oldi
ng a
rea
with
in th
e fo
rmer
fede
ral
parc
el, w
hich
com
prise
s th
e so
uthe
rn a
nd e
aste
rn p
ortio
ns o
f th
e stu
dy a
rea,
so
uth
of O
ld M
amm
oth
Roa
d an
d ea
st of
Fai
rway
Driv
e, w
ould
be
lost
as a
re
sult
of t
he p
ropo
sed
golf
cour
se e
xpan
sion.
Fu
rther
mor
e, a
n ad
ditio
nal
appr
oxim
atel
y 49
acr
es o
f po
tent
ial f
orag
ing
and
resti
ng h
abita
t sou
th o
f O
ld
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad a
nd e
ast
of F
airw
ay D
rive
that
may
be
used
by
deer
in
the
adja
cent
hol
ding
are
a w
ould
be
lost
by P
roje
ct c
onstr
uctio
n.
The
loss
of
the
hold
ing
area
and
add
ition
al f
orag
ing
and
resti
ng h
abita
t cou
ld b
e re
duce
d to
a
less
-than
-sig
nific
ant l
evel
by
impl
emen
tatio
n of
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-4
a.
Cons
truct
ion-
rela
ted
activ
ities
(e.
g.,
noise
and
vib
ratio
n fro
m c
onstr
uctio
n eq
uipm
ent,
incr
ease
hum
an a
ctiv
ity)
coul
d re
sult
in d
istur
banc
e of
ind
ivid
ual
mul
e de
er c
urre
ntly
usin
g th
e ho
ldin
g ar
ea a
nd th
e stu
dy a
rea
for f
orag
ing
and
resti
ng, a
s wel
l as i
ndiv
idua
ls ex
iting
the
hold
ing
area
alo
ng th
e M
amm
oth
Roc
k m
igra
tion
rout
e, lo
cate
d so
uth
of th
e Pr
ojec
t site
. A
lthou
gh th
ese
impa
cts w
ould
be
tem
pora
ry,
as t
hey
wou
ld o
nly
occu
r du
ring
the
cons
truct
ion
perio
d,
impl
emen
tatio
n of
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-4
b, p
rohi
bitin
g m
ajor
con
struc
tion
activ
ities
(e.
g., v
eget
atio
n cl
earin
g an
d gr
ubbi
ng a
nd g
radi
ng)
until
dee
r ha
ve
com
plet
ed s
prin
g an
d fa
ll m
igra
tion
(gen
eral
ly f
rom
Apr
il 15
thro
ugh
June
1
and
from
Oct
ober
1 th
roug
h N
ovem
ber 1
5),
wou
ld re
duce
con
struc
tion-
rela
ted
distu
rban
ce im
pact
s to
less
than
sign
ifica
nt.
Follo
win
g co
nstru
ctio
n, d
eer
usin
g th
e ho
ldin
g ar
ea a
nd t
he M
amm
oth
Rock
M
igra
tion
rout
e co
uld
be d
irect
ly a
nd/o
r ind
irect
ly im
pact
ed b
y th
e op
erat
ion
of
the
resid
entia
l, re
sort,
rec
reat
iona
l, re
tail,
and
pub
lic a
men
ities
com
pone
nts
of
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-4
a
To o
ffset
the
loss
of h
oldi
ng a
rea
deer
hab
itat,
the
appl
ican
t sha
ll pu
rcha
se o
r con
tribu
te
fund
s to
purc
hase
a c
onse
rvat
ion
ease
men
t on
prop
erty
(ies)
that
con
tain
impo
rtant
land
s in
the
win
ter r
ange
, mig
ratio
n co
rrido
r, an
d/or
hol
ding
are
a of
the
Roun
d V
alle
y m
ule
deer
he
rd o
r an
y ot
her
mig
rato
ry m
ule
deer
her
d w
ithin
the
Mam
mot
h La
kes
vici
nity
as
dete
rmin
ed b
y th
e C
DFG
. Th
e am
ount
of
acre
age
to b
e pu
rcha
sed
or m
ade
part
of a
co
nser
vatio
n ea
sem
ent (
“rep
lace
men
t lan
d”) t
o of
fset
the
loss
of m
ule
deer
hab
itat b
y th
is pr
ojec
t sh
all
be d
eter
min
ed b
y th
e C
DFG
, an
d ba
sed
upon
the
rec
omm
enda
tion
of a
qu
alifi
ed b
iolo
gist.
The
loca
tion
and
quan
tity
of re
plac
emen
t lan
d sh
all b
e ba
sed
upon
the
acre
age
of d
eer h
abita
t affe
cted
by
the
deve
lopm
ent a
nd th
e co
mpa
rativ
e be
nefit
s or v
alue
to
the
mul
e de
er h
erd
of t
he h
abita
t be
ing
rem
oved
by
this
proj
ect
to t
he a
rea
bein
g ac
quire
d or
pro
tect
ed.
Cons
eque
ntly
, the
CD
FG s
hall
not b
e re
quire
d to
util
ize
a sim
ple
rem
oval
to re
plac
emen
t rat
io, b
ut s
hall
be p
erm
itted
to c
onsid
er o
ther
fact
ors
such
as
the
qual
ity a
nd q
uant
ity o
f pl
ant f
orag
ing
mat
eria
l in
the
rem
oval
are
a an
d th
e re
plac
emen
t ar
ea a
nd w
heth
er th
e re
plac
emen
t are
a la
nd se
rves
to p
rote
ct im
porta
nt la
nds i
n th
e w
inte
r ra
nge,
mig
ratio
n co
rrido
r an
d/or
the
hold
ing
area
for
the
herd
. In
lieu
of
prov
idin
g fo
r re
plac
emen
t la
nd,
the
CDFG
may
app
rove
oth
er m
eans
rec
omm
ende
d by
a q
ualif
ied
biol
ogist
by
whi
ch th
e ap
plic
ant
shal
l pr
otec
t or
enha
nce
habi
tat
for
the
Roun
d V
alle
y m
ule
deer
her
d or
any
oth
er m
igra
ting
mul
e de
er h
erd
with
in t
he M
amm
oth
Lake
s vi
cini
ty, s
uch
as e
rect
ing
fenc
ing
alon
g U
.S. H
ighw
ay 3
95 to
pro
tect
the
deer
her
d fro
m
vehi
cula
r tra
ffic,
pro
vidi
ng m
onet
ary
cont
ribut
ions
tow
ard
the
cons
truct
ion
of a
dee
r un
derc
ross
ing
alon
g U
.S. H
ighw
ay 3
95, o
r oth
er m
eans
to e
nhan
ce th
e he
rd’s
hab
itat,
or
prot
ect t
he h
erd,
that
is ro
ughl
y pr
opor
tiona
l to
the
impa
ct o
n th
e de
er h
erd
of th
e lo
ss o
f
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-26
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
the
Proj
ect.
Im
plem
enta
tion
of M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-4c
wou
ld f
urth
er
redu
ce p
oten
tial
impa
cts
to d
eer
to a
les
s-th
an-s
igni
fican
t le
vel.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-4
c in
clud
es a
dditi
onal
goo
d w
ildlif
e m
anag
emen
t pr
actic
es t
o th
ose
outli
ned
in M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-1e
abov
e.
Mea
sure
s ar
e co
nsist
ent
with
goa
ls an
d po
licie
s in
the
Tow
n’s
1987
Gen
eral
Pla
n (e
.g.,
1987
Gen
eral
Pl
an –
Wild
life
Reso
urce
s Goa
l 2 a
nd P
olic
y 4)
.
The
golf
cour
se v
eget
atio
n an
d as
soci
ated
hab
itats
coul
d at
tract
dee
r, le
adin
g to
th
e re
ques
t for
dep
reda
tion
perm
its a
nd/o
r co
nstru
ctio
n of
dee
r-pro
of f
enci
ng.
Such
req
uest
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
pot
entia
lly s
igni
fican
t im
pact
s be
caus
e th
ey
wou
ld r
esul
t in
dire
ct t
ake
of d
eer
and
inte
rfere
with
mov
emen
t pa
ttern
s, re
spec
tivel
y.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
goo
d w
ildlif
e m
anag
emen
t pra
ctic
es o
utlin
ed
in M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-4c
wou
ld re
duce
thes
e ad
ditio
nal i
mpa
cts
to d
eer t
o le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
.
As d
iscus
sed
in m
ore
deta
il in
the
Wild
life
Mov
emen
t Cor
ridor
s sec
tion,
a sm
all
num
ber o
f dee
r fro
m th
e Ro
und
Val
ley
herd
may
rem
ain
in th
e M
amm
oth
area
du
ring
the
sum
mer
, an
d ha
ve b
een
docu
men
ted
as u
sing
a fa
wni
ng s
ite
sout
hwes
t of
the
Proj
ect s
ite.
Giv
en th
e di
stanc
e be
twee
n th
e Pr
ojec
t site
and
fa
wni
ng s
ite,
cons
truct
ion
and
oper
atio
n of
the
Pro
ject
is
not
likel
y to
su
bsta
ntia
lly a
ffect
use
of t
his n
ativ
e w
ildlif
e nu
rser
y sit
e, re
sulti
ng in
less
-than
-sig
nific
ant i
mpa
cts.
deer
her
d ha
bita
t cau
sed
by th
e pr
ojec
t (th
e “i
n lie
u pr
otec
tion
prog
ram
”).
The
prop
osed
land
pro
tect
ion
agre
emen
t or
in li
eu p
rote
ctio
n pr
ogra
m s
hall
be p
repa
red
by th
e ap
plic
ant i
n cl
ose
cons
ulta
tion
with
the
Tow
n, C
DFG
and
dire
ctly
affe
cted
par
ties
(i.e.
, th
e se
ller(s
) of
the
con
serv
atio
n ea
sem
ent
or t
he r
ecip
ient
s of
the
mon
etar
y co
ntrib
utio
ns u
nder
the
in
lieu
prog
ram
). P
rior
to t
he o
nset
of
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
as
soci
ated
with
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
new
gol
f cou
rse,
loca
ted
on th
ose
porti
ons
of th
e sit
e th
at h
ave
histo
rical
ly b
een
deer
hab
itat,
the
Tow
n sh
all r
ecei
ve a
sig
ned
copy
of t
he
land
pro
tect
ion
agre
emen
t, ex
ecut
ed b
y al
l dire
ctly
affe
cted
par
ties
as d
efin
ed a
bove
, or
obta
in w
ritte
n co
nfirm
atio
n fro
m C
DFG
of
CDFG
’s a
ppro
val
of t
he i
n lie
u pr
otec
tion
prog
ram
pro
pose
d by
the
appl
ican
t. C
onstr
uctio
n ac
tiviti
es in
clud
e ve
geta
tion
clea
ring
and
grub
bing
and
gra
ding
. In
all
even
ts, im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e ap
prov
ed la
nd p
rote
ctio
n ag
reem
ent o
r in
lieu
prot
ectio
n pr
ogra
m s
hall
be c
omm
ence
d to
the
CDFG
’s s
atisf
actio
n,
prio
r to
an
y gr
adin
g of
th
e ap
prox
imat
ely
46
acre
s of
im
pact
ed
deer
ha
bita
t.
Impl
emen
tatio
n sh
all b
e co
mpl
eted
in s
tage
s, to
the
satis
fact
ion
of th
e CD
FG, s
o as
to
ensu
re th
at th
e m
itiga
tion
occu
rs w
ithin
a su
ffici
ently
shor
t per
iod
of ti
me
afte
r the
impa
ct
has
occu
rred,
in o
rder
to m
inim
ize
any
poss
ibili
ty o
f an
unm
itiga
ted
impa
ct.
The
Tow
n w
ill r
eser
ve t
he o
ptio
n to
del
ay t
he o
nset
of
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
in
the
even
t it
dete
rmin
es t
hat
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
pro
pose
d la
nd p
rote
ctio
n ag
reem
ent
or i
n lie
u pr
otec
tion
prog
ram
has
bee
n un
duly
del
ayed
or o
bstru
cted
by
the
appl
ican
t.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-4
b
Maj
or c
onstr
uctio
n ac
tiviti
es (e
.g.,
vege
tatio
n cl
earin
g an
d gr
ubbi
ng, a
nd g
radi
ng) w
ithin
th
e de
velo
pmen
t ar
ea s
outh
of
Old
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad s
hall
not
occu
r w
hen
signi
fican
t nu
mbe
rs o
f mig
ratin
g de
er a
re p
rese
nt in
the
Proj
ect v
icin
ity (g
ener
ally
dur
ing
the
perio
d fro
m A
pril
15 t
hrou
gh J
une
1 an
d fro
m O
ctob
er 1
thr
ough
Nov
embe
r 15
) to
avo
id
pote
ntia
l adv
erse
impa
cts
to th
e R
ound
Val
ley
mul
e de
er h
erd
usin
g th
e Sh
erw
in h
oldi
ng
area
and
Mam
mot
h Ro
ck m
igra
tion
rout
e du
ring
the
sprin
g an
d fa
ll m
igra
tion
perio
ds.
Beca
use
the
actu
al d
ates
of
cons
truct
ion
will
be
base
d on
dee
r ar
rival
at a
nd d
epar
ture
fro
m t
he P
roje
ct v
icin
ity,
whi
ch w
ill d
epen
d on
wea
ther
and
sno
w c
ondi
tions
, a
mon
itorin
g pr
ogra
m sh
all b
e de
velo
ped
and
impl
emen
ted,
in c
oord
inat
ion
with
CD
FG a
nd
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-27
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
othe
r ap
prop
riate
age
ncie
s, to
det
erm
ine
the
pres
ence
of
deer
in
the
area
. A
ll m
ajor
co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es s
hall
be c
ondu
cted
dur
ing
the
inte
rim p
erio
ds b
etw
een
sprin
g an
d fa
ll m
igra
tion
perio
ds o
nly.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
IO-4
c
In a
dditi
on t
o th
e go
od w
ildlif
e m
anag
emen
t pr
actic
es o
utlin
ed i
n M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BI
O-1
e, th
e fo
llow
ing
habi
tat m
anag
emen
t pra
ctic
es sh
all b
e im
plem
ente
d:
• N
o fe
nces
or
othe
r po
tent
ial i
mpe
dim
ents
to d
eer
and
othe
r w
ildlif
e m
ovem
ent
shal
l be
insta
lled
alon
g th
e ou
ter e
dges
of t
he P
roje
ct s
ite, p
artic
ular
ly a
long
the
sout
hern
and
eas
tern
Pro
ject
bou
ndar
ies f
or d
eer.
• N
o de
pred
atio
n pe
rmits
for
con
trolli
ng d
eer
shal
l be
req
ueste
d.
The
appl
ican
t re
cogn
izes
that
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f lan
ds w
ithin
dee
r hab
itat c
onta
ins
asso
ciat
ed
risks
of d
amag
e, w
hich
is a
ccep
tabl
e.
• Re
quire
m
anag
emen
t pr
actic
es
of
land
scap
es
treat
ed
with
pe
stici
des
that
m
inim
ize
low
-leve
l ex
posu
res
and
sub-
leth
al e
ffect
s to
wild
life.
H
erbi
cide
s, pe
stici
des,
and
fung
icid
e ap
plic
atio
n re
cord
s an
d ot
her
land
scap
e an
d tu
rfgra
ss
man
agem
ent r
ecor
ds s
hall
be m
ade
avai
labl
e to
the
Tow
n or
CD
FG a
t any
tim
e up
on re
ques
t.
Impa
ct B
IO-5
Con
form
ance
with
Tow
n Po
licie
s and
Ord
inan
ces
A to
tal o
f 106
tree
s ha
ve b
een
iden
tifie
d w
ithin
the
deve
lopm
ent a
rea
that
mee
t th
e m
inim
um s
ize
(six
inch
es in
dia
met
er)
to r
equi
re a
ppro
val f
rom
the
Tow
n pr
ior
to
rem
oval
(T
own
of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Mun
icip
al
Cod
e,
Chap
ter
17.1
6.05
0).
Bec
ause
all
the
nativ
e tre
es o
ver
six i
nche
s ar
e in
tend
ed t
o be
re
tain
ed a
nd a
ny p
ropo
sed
for r
emov
al fo
llow
ing
the
arbo
rist’s
revi
ew w
ould
be
subj
ect
to a
ppro
val
from
the
Tow
n pr
ior
to t
heir
rem
oval
, the
Pro
ject
wou
ld
have
no
impa
ct o
n tre
es re
gula
ted
by th
e To
wn.
As
disc
usse
d ab
ove
in I
mpa
ct B
IO-2
Sen
sitiv
e N
atur
al C
omm
uniti
es, i
ndire
ct,
unan
ticip
ated
im
pact
s to
wat
ers
and
wet
mea
dow
hab
itat
coul
d oc
cur
durin
g
No
addi
tiona
l miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-28
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
with
in t
he d
evel
opm
ent
area
in
the
adja
cent
bas
in
sage
brus
h ha
bita
t no
rth o
f O
ld M
amm
oth
Roa
d, s
uch
as i
nadv
erte
nt d
amag
e fro
m e
quip
men
t or
veh
icle
sta
ging
, or
eros
ion.
Su
ch i
mpa
cts
wou
ld c
onfli
ct
with
goa
ls an
d po
licie
s in
the
Tow
n’s
1987
Gen
eral
Pla
n, s
peci
fical
ly N
atur
al
Veg
etat
ive
Reso
urce
s Po
licy
3 an
d H
abita
t. H
owev
er,
impl
emen
tatio
n of
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
BIO
-2b,
req
uirin
g fe
ncin
g, m
onito
ring,
and
oth
er b
est
man
agem
ent p
ract
ices
, wou
ld re
duce
thes
e im
pact
s to
less
than
sign
ifica
nt.
The
Proj
ect
coul
d al
so r
esul
t in
inc
reas
ed w
ildlif
e an
d hu
man
int
erac
tions
, pa
rticu
larly
alo
ng th
e so
uthe
rn a
nd e
aste
rn P
roje
ct b
ound
arie
s w
here
dee
r an
d ot
her
wild
life
may
res
ide.
In
cide
ntal
hum
an c
onta
ct a
nd i
ntru
sion
impa
cts
wou
ld c
onfli
ct w
ith th
e go
als
and
polic
ies
in th
e To
wn’
s 19
87 G
ener
al P
lan,
sp
ecifi
cally
W
ildlif
e Re
sour
ces
Polic
y 3.
How
ever
, im
plem
enta
tion
of
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re B
io-1
e an
d M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
Bio
-4c,
whi
ch i
nclu
des
good
wild
life
habi
tat
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
suc
h as
lig
htin
g an
d fe
ncin
g re
stric
tions
, and
dom
estic
pet
con
trol,
wou
ld re
duce
thes
e im
pact
s to
a le
ss-th
an-
signi
fican
t lev
el.
Impa
ct B
IO-6
Co
nfor
man
ce w
ith A
dopt
ed H
abita
t Co
nser
vatio
n Pl
ans,
Nat
ural
Com
mun
ity C
onse
rvat
ion
Plan
, or
othe
r ap
prov
ed lo
cal,
regi
onal
, or
state
hab
itat c
onse
rvat
ion
plan
No
Hab
itat
Cons
erva
tion
Plan
s, N
atur
al C
omm
unity
Con
serv
atio
n Pl
ans
or
othe
r loc
al o
r reg
iona
l pla
ns h
ave
been
ado
pted
with
in th
e To
wn’
s U
GB
whi
ch
enco
mpa
sses
the
Pro
ject
site
, t
here
fore
, no
im
pact
s ar
e an
ticip
ated
and
no
miti
gatio
n w
ould
be
cons
ider
ed n
eces
sary
.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct B
IO-7
Cum
ulat
ive
Impa
cts
Spec
ial-S
tatu
s Spe
cies
The
mea
sure
s pre
scrib
ed to
miti
gatio
n su
ch im
pact
s und
er th
e Pr
ojec
t, an
d gi
ven
the
smal
l siz
e of
the
rela
ted
proj
ects
and/
or th
e lo
catio
n in
exi
sting
dev
elop
ed
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-29
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
area
s, th
ese
impa
cts
are
not a
ntic
ipat
ed to
be
cum
ulat
ivel
y co
nsid
erab
le w
hen
eval
uate
d w
ith o
ther
rela
ted
proj
ects
in th
e vi
cini
ty.
Sens
itive
Nat
ural
Com
mun
ities
Beca
use
of t
he P
roje
ct’s
des
ign
and
pres
crib
ed m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s, th
e po
tent
ial a
dditi
on o
f re
late
d pr
ojec
ts im
pact
s to
the
Proj
ect’s
sen
sitiv
e na
tura
l co
mm
uniti
es’ i
mpa
cts a
re n
ot a
ntic
ipat
ed to
be
cum
ulat
ivel
y co
nsid
erab
le.
Mig
rato
ry D
eer
The
deer
hol
ding
are
a pl
ays s
uch
an in
tegr
al ro
le in
affe
ctin
g pr
oduc
tivity
of t
he
deer
her
d, r
emov
al o
f th
is ha
bita
t fro
m t
he p
ropo
sed
proj
ect
is co
nsid
ered
po
tent
ially
sig
nific
ant.
Whe
n im
pact
s to
mig
rato
ry d
eer
from
the
pro
pose
d pr
ojec
t’s a
re c
onsid
ered
col
lect
ivel
y w
ith r
elat
ed p
roje
cts
in th
e vi
cini
ty, t
hese
im
pact
s m
ay b
e cu
mul
ativ
ely
cons
ider
able
, as
the
y m
ay r
esul
t in
an
over
all
distu
rban
ce to
mul
e de
er m
igra
tion
alon
g th
e M
amm
oth
Roc
k co
rrido
r. G
iven
th
e sm
all s
ize
of th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts (e
spec
ially
rela
tive
to th
e pr
opos
ed P
roje
ct)
and/
or th
e lo
catio
n of
mos
t of
the
rela
ted
proj
ects
in e
xisti
ng d
evel
oped
are
as,
this
impa
ct t
o de
er m
igra
tion
hold
ing
area
is
not
cons
ider
ed c
umul
ativ
ely
signi
fican
t.
The
Roun
d V
alle
y he
rd o
nce
utili
zed
the
entir
e M
amm
oth
Lake
s ba
sin f
or it
s ho
ldin
g ar
ea a
nd m
igra
tion
corri
dor,
but
it h
as s
ince
bee
n pu
shed
fur
ther
eas
t an
d so
uth
due
to d
evel
opm
ent w
ithin
the
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
over
the
past
cent
ury.
H
owev
er,
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
Pro
ject
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res,
incl
udin
g th
e pr
opos
ed la
nd p
rote
ctio
n ag
reem
ent o
r in
lieu
prot
ectio
n pr
ogra
m,
restr
ictio
ns o
n th
e co
nstru
ctio
n se
ason
, an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of g
ood
wild
life
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
, th
e im
pact
s to
mig
rato
ry d
eer
hold
ing
area
fro
m t
he
Proj
ect a
nd p
ast p
roje
cts i
s not
exp
ecte
d to
be
cum
ulat
ivel
y co
nsid
erab
le.
Inyo
Nat
iona
l For
est –
Rec
reat
iona
l Im
pact
s to
Biol
ogic
al R
esou
rces
How
ever
, with
the
mea
sure
s pro
pose
d to
miti
gate
impa
cts u
nder
the
Proj
ect,
and
give
n th
e sm
all
size
of t
he r
elat
ed p
roje
cts
as c
ompa
red
to t
he P
roje
ct, t
hese
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-30
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
impa
cts
are
not
antic
ipat
ed t
o be
cum
ulat
ivel
y co
nsid
erab
le o
r sig
nific
antly
ad
vers
e w
hen
eval
uate
d w
ith o
ther
rela
ted
proj
ects
in th
e vi
cini
ty.
The
antic
ipat
ed p
opul
atio
n in
crea
se m
ay h
ave
signi
fican
t im
pact
s up
on s
peci
al-
statu
s spe
cies
with
in th
e ad
jace
nt In
yo N
atio
nal F
ores
t.
Impa
cts
to n
atur
al r
esou
rces
with
in th
e In
yo N
atio
nal F
ores
t fro
m r
ecre
atio
nal
use
are
expe
cted
to in
crea
se d
ue to
the
Tow
n’s
cum
ulat
ive
popu
latio
n in
crea
se
from
the
proj
ect a
nd o
ther
regi
onal
resid
entia
l pro
ject
s, an
d th
ese
impa
cts
may
be
con
sider
ed c
umul
ativ
ely
cons
ider
able
or
signi
fican
tly a
dver
se;
how
ever
, id
entif
icat
ion
and
quan
tific
atio
n of
such
impa
cts w
ould
be
spec
ulat
ive
unde
r the
cu
rrent
ana
lysis
. M
uch
of t
he r
ecre
atio
nal
Fore
st us
es f
rom
the
cum
ulat
ive
popu
latio
n gr
owth
in
the
area
will
rev
olve
aro
und
thes
e in
crea
singl
y po
pula
r ou
tdoo
r act
iviti
es.
Com
plia
nce
with
the
Tow
n’s
2007
Gen
eral
Pla
n, r
equi
ring
the
Tow
n to
wor
k cl
osel
y w
ith a
genc
ies,
incl
udin
g th
e In
yo N
atio
nal
Fore
st, t
o en
sure
tha
t th
e re
gion
al n
atur
al e
cosy
stem
is
mai
ntai
ned,
will
not
res
ult
in c
umul
ativ
ely
cons
ider
able
impa
cts
to s
ensit
ive
natu
ral r
esou
rces
in th
e In
yo N
atio
nal F
ores
t fro
m in
crea
sed
popu
latio
n an
d re
crea
tion.
CU
LTU
RA
L R
ESO
UR
CES
(CU
LT)
Impa
ct C
ULT
-1 I
mpa
cts t
o K
nown
Cul
tura
l Res
ourc
es
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re C
ULT
-1
As
disc
usse
d in
the
“En
viro
nmen
tal
Setti
ng”
abov
e, t
he P
roje
ct s
ite a
nd
imm
edia
te v
icin
ity h
ave
been
sub
ject
ed to
mul
tiple
cul
tura
l res
ourc
es s
tudi
es.
Two
know
n re
sour
ces,
CA
-MN
O-3
, w
hich
inc
lude
s re
mna
nts
of t
he “
Old
M
amm
oth”
tow
nsite
, and
CA
-MN
O-8
93H
, the
Bod
le D
itch,
are
loca
ted
with
in
the
Proj
ect s
ite.
Follo
win
g is
a di
scus
sion
of th
e Pr
ojec
t’s im
pact
s w
ith re
spec
t to
thes
e kn
own
prev
ious
ly re
cord
ed c
ultu
ral r
esou
rces
.
CA-M
NO
-3:
The
Proj
ect h
as th
e po
tent
ial t
o im
pact
CA
-MN
O-3
sou
th o
f Old
M
amm
oth
Road
. B
ecau
se t
he s
ite w
as c
appe
d w
ith n
on-c
ultu
ral
fill,
it is
For
the
porti
on o
f C
A-M
NO
-3 lo
cate
d no
rth o
f O
ld M
amm
oth
Road
the
appl
ican
t sha
ll im
plem
ent a
ny o
f the
follo
win
g m
easu
res
to re
duce
the
signi
fican
t im
pact
to a
less
than
sig
nific
ant l
evel
:
• pl
an c
onstr
uctio
n to
avo
id th
e sit
e,
• de
ed c
onse
rvat
ion
ease
men
ts,
• ca
p th
e sit
e pr
ior t
o co
nstru
ctio
n, o
r
• pe
rform
arc
haeo
logi
cal d
ata
reco
very
.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-31
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
unlik
ely
that
the
min
or, P
roje
ct-re
late
d ch
ange
s to
the
golf
cour
se a
t the
gro
und
surfa
ce w
ill i
mpa
ct t
he s
ite.
As
such
, any
pro
ject
-rela
ted
impa
cts
asso
ciat
ed
with
alte
ratio
ns to
the
golf
cour
se to
Site
CA
-MN
O-3
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
less
th
an si
gnifi
cant
und
er C
EQA
.
The
Proj
ect h
as th
e po
tent
ial t
o im
pact
the
signi
fican
t pre
histo
ric a
nd h
istor
ic
com
pone
nts
of C
A-M
NO
-3 n
orth
of O
ld M
amm
oth
Roa
d. T
he p
ortio
n of
this
site
that
inc
lude
s th
e “O
ld M
amm
oth”
tow
nsite
is
also
con
sider
ed s
igni
fican
t be
caus
e it
mee
ts cr
iterio
n 1
and
4 of
the
Cal
iforn
ia R
egist
er c
riter
ia f
or i
ts as
soci
atio
n w
ith e
vent
s im
porta
nt to
regi
onal
hist
ory.
The
refo
re, P
roje
ct-re
late
d im
pact
s to
Site
CA
-MN
O-3
in
this
area
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
pot
entia
lly
signi
fican
t un
der
CEQ
A.
As
such
, m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s ar
e re
com
men
ded
belo
w th
at w
ould
redu
ce a
ny s
uch
impa
cts
to c
ultu
ral r
esou
rces
to a
less
-than
-sig
nific
ant l
evel
.
Impa
ct C
ULT
-2 I
mpa
cts t
o U
nkno
wn
Cul
tura
l Res
ourc
es
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res C
ULT
-2a
thro
ugh
2f
Porti
ons
of t
he P
roje
ct s
ite n
orth
of
Old
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad a
re s
ensit
ive
for
preh
istor
ic a
nd h
istor
ic a
rcha
eolo
gica
l res
ourc
es, a
nd h
uman
rem
ains
. Bu
ried
(pre
viou
sly u
nrec
orde
d) p
rehi
storic
and
hist
oric
arc
haeo
logi
cal d
epos
its m
ay b
e pr
esen
t w
ithin
the
Pro
ject
site
. I
n ad
ditio
n, p
revi
ously
uni
dent
ified
fea
ture
s an
d/or
dia
gnos
tic a
rtifa
cts
with
in p
revi
ously
rec
orde
d sit
es m
ay b
e pr
esen
t w
ithin
the
Pro
ject
site
. G
roun
d-di
sturb
ing
cons
truct
ion
asso
ciat
ed w
ith t
he
Proj
ect
has
the
pote
ntia
l to
res
ult
in s
igni
fican
t im
pact
s to
unk
now
n cu
ltura
l re
sour
ces.
As
such
, miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
are
reco
mm
ende
d be
low
that
wou
ld
redu
ce a
ny su
ch im
pact
s to
unkn
own
cultu
ral r
esou
rces
to a
less
-than
-sig
nific
ant
leve
l.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re C
ULT
-2a
A M
itiga
tion
Mon
itorin
g an
d Re
porti
ng P
lan
(MM
RP)
shal
l be
prep
ared
by
a qu
alifi
ed
arch
aeol
ogist
prio
r to
Proj
ect c
onstr
uctio
n fo
r the
por
tion
of th
e Pr
ojec
t site
nor
th o
f Old
M
amm
oth
Road
. T
he M
MRP
sha
ll ou
tline
the
pro
toco
l fo
r no
tific
atio
n, t
empo
rary
pr
otec
tion,
doc
umen
tatio
n, a
nd e
valu
atio
n of
pre
viou
sly u
nrec
orde
d cu
ltura
l re
sour
ces
enco
unte
red
durin
g co
nstru
ctio
n, a
s w
ell a
s m
itiga
tion
of p
roje
ct-re
late
d im
pact
s to
any
su
ch r
esou
rces
tha
t ar
e co
nsid
ered
sig
nific
ant
unde
r CE
QA
, an
d th
e cu
ratio
n of
any
ar
tifac
ts or
sam
ples
col
lect
ed i
n th
e fie
ld.
The
MM
RP s
hall
incl
ude
a sa
mpl
e da
ta
reco
very
pla
n an
d a
cura
tion
agre
emen
t. T
his
docu
men
t sh
all
be c
ompl
eted
prio
r to
co
mm
ence
men
t of
an
y gr
ound
-dist
urbi
ng
activ
ity
asso
ciat
ed
with
th
e Pr
ojec
t sit
e (in
clud
ing
clea
ring,
bru
shin
g, g
rubb
ing,
veg
etat
ion
rem
oval
, disk
ing,
gra
ding
, tre
nchi
ng,
exca
vatio
n, a
nd/o
r bor
ing)
.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re C
UL
T-2
b
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-32
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
A q
ualif
ied
arch
aeol
ogist
sha
ll m
onito
r all
grou
nd-d
istur
bing
con
struc
tion
in n
ativ
e so
ils
for
the
porti
on o
f th
e Pr
ojec
t sit
e no
rth o
f O
ld M
amm
oth
Road
. (
Cons
truct
ion
wor
k w
ithin
sto
ckpi
le m
ater
ial d
oes n
ot re
quire
mon
itorin
g.)
The
cons
truct
ion
mon
itor s
hall
be
supp
lied
with
map
s an
d sit
e re
cord
s fo
r the
pre
viou
sly re
cord
ed c
ultu
ral r
esou
rces
with
in
the
Proj
ect s
ite, s
o th
at s
he/h
e ca
n di
sting
uish
new
res
ourc
es f
rom
thos
e th
at h
ave
been
pr
evio
usly
rec
orde
d an
d ev
alua
ted.
Th
e m
onito
r sh
all
prep
are
a da
ily m
onito
ring
log
reco
rdin
g th
e ty
pe
of
wor
k m
onito
red,
so
il co
nditi
ons,
disc
over
ies,
and
gene
ral
obse
rvat
ions
.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re C
ULT
-2c
Prev
ious
ly u
nkno
wn
cultu
ral
reso
urce
s id
entif
ied
durin
g Pr
ojec
t co
nstru
ctio
n sh
all
be
prot
ecte
d th
roug
h te
mpo
rary
red
irect
ion
of w
ork
and
poss
ibly
oth
er m
etho
ds s
uch
as
fenc
ing
(to b
e ou
tline
d in
the
MM
RP)
unt
il fo
rmal
ly e
valu
ated
for
sig
nific
ance
und
er
CEQ
A.
In t
he e
vent
tha
t pr
evio
usly
unr
ecor
ded
cultu
ral
reso
urce
s ar
e ex
pose
d du
ring
cons
truct
ion,
the
mon
itor
shal
l be
em
pow
ered
to
tem
pora
rily
halt
cons
truct
ion
in t
he
imm
edia
te v
icin
ity o
f the
disc
over
y w
hile
it is
doc
umen
ted
and
eval
uate
d fo
r sig
nific
ance
. Co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es m
ay c
ontin
ue i
n ot
her
area
s. I
f th
e di
scov
ery
is ev
alua
ted
as
signi
fican
t un
der
CEQ
A,
addi
tiona
l w
ork
such
as
data
rec
over
y ex
cava
tion
may
be
war
rant
ed to
miti
gate
pro
ject
-rela
ted
impa
cts t
o a
less
-than
-sig
nific
ant l
evel
.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re C
UL
T-2
d
Proc
edur
es o
f con
duct
follo
win
g th
e di
scov
ery
of h
uman
rem
ains
hav
e be
en m
anda
ted
by
Hea
lth a
nd S
afet
y Co
de §
7050
.5, P
ublic
Res
ourc
es C
ode
§509
7.98
and
the
Cal
iforn
ia
Code
of
Regu
latio
ns §
1506
4.5(
e) (
CEQ
A).
Acc
ordi
ng t
o th
e pr
ovisi
ons
in C
EQA
, if
hum
an r
emai
ns a
re e
ncou
nter
ed a
t th
e sit
e, a
ll w
ork
in t
he i
mm
edia
te v
icin
ity o
f th
e di
scov
ery
shal
l cea
se a
nd n
eces
sary
ste
ps to
ens
ure
the
inte
grity
of
the
imm
edia
te a
rea
shal
l be
take
n.
The
Mon
o C
ount
y Co
rone
r sh
all b
e no
tifie
d im
med
iate
ly. T
he C
oron
er
shal
l the
n de
term
ine
whe
ther
the
rem
ains
are
Nat
ive
Am
eric
an.
If th
e Co
rone
r det
erm
ines
th
e re
mai
ns a
re N
ativ
e A
mer
ican
, the
Cor
oner
sha
ll no
tify
the
NA
HC
with
in 2
4 ho
urs,
who
will
, in
turn
, not
ify th
e pe
rson
the
NA
HC
iden
tifie
s as
the
mos
t lik
ely
desc
ende
nt
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-33
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
(MLD
) of a
ny h
uman
rem
ains
. Fu
rther
act
ions
shal
l be
dete
rmin
ed, i
n pa
rt, b
y th
e de
sires
of
the
MLD
. Th
e M
LD h
as 2
4 ho
urs t
o m
ake
reco
mm
enda
tions
rega
rdin
g th
e di
spos
ition
of
the
rem
ains
follo
win
g no
tific
atio
n fro
m th
e N
AH
C of
the
disc
over
y. I
f the
MLD
doe
s no
t mak
e re
com
men
datio
ns w
ithin
24
hour
s, th
e ow
ner s
hall,
with
app
ropr
iate
dig
nity
, re-
inte
rn
the
rem
ains
in
an
ar
ea
of
the
prop
erty
se
cure
fro
m
furth
er
distu
rban
ce.
Alte
rnat
ivel
y, if
the
owne
r doe
s not
acc
ept t
he M
LD’s
reco
mm
enda
tions
, the
ow
ner o
r the
de
scen
dent
may
requ
est m
edia
tion
by th
e N
AH
C.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re C
ULT
-2e
A m
onito
ring
repo
rt sh
all
be p
repa
red
upon
com
plet
ion
of c
onstr
uctio
n m
onito
ring,
su
mm
ariz
ing
the
resu
lts o
f the
mon
itorin
g ef
fort.
Site
reco
rds
for a
ny n
ewly
reco
rded
or
upda
ted
cultu
ral r
esou
rces
shal
l be
appe
nded
to th
e m
onito
ring
repo
rt.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re C
ULT
-2f
Arti
fact
s or
sam
ples
col
lect
ed d
urin
g th
e co
urse
of
cons
truct
ion
mon
itorin
g an
d an
y te
sting
or
data
rec
over
y as
soci
ated
with
new
ly d
iscov
ered
res
ourc
es s
hall
be c
urat
ed in
pe
rpet
uity
in a
n ap
prop
riate
faci
lity
upon
com
plet
ion
of a
naly
sis a
nd p
roce
ssin
g. �
Impa
ct C
ULT
-3 C
umul
ativ
e Im
pact
s
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Proj
ect i
n co
mbi
natio
n w
ith th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts w
ould
re
sult
in t
he
deve
lopm
ent
of
addi
tiona
l lo
w-
to h
igh-
dens
ity r
esid
entia
l, co
mm
erci
al,
insti
tutio
nal,
publ
ic r
esor
t, an
d in
dustr
ial
land
use
s. I
mpa
cts
to
cultu
ral
reso
urce
s (in
clud
ing
histo
ric,
arch
aeol
ogic
al,
and
pale
onto
logi
cal
reso
urce
s, as
wel
l as h
uman
rem
ains
) ten
d to
be
site-
spec
ific
and
are
asse
ssed
on
a sit
e-by
-site
bas
is. T
he e
xten
t of t
he c
ultu
ral r
esou
rces
(if a
ny) t
hat o
ccur
at t
he
rela
ted
proj
ect s
ites
is ge
nera
lly u
nkno
wn
and,
as
such
, it i
s no
t kno
wn
whe
ther
an
y of
the
rel
ated
pro
ject
s w
ould
res
ult
in s
igni
fican
t im
pact
s to
cul
tura
l re
sour
ces.
How
ever
, sim
ilar t
o th
e Pr
ojec
t, su
ch d
eter
min
atio
ns w
ould
be
mad
e on
a c
ase-
by-c
ase
basis
and
, if n
eces
sary
, the
app
lican
ts of
the
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld
be
requ
ired
to
impl
emen
t th
e ap
prop
riate
m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-34
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Furth
erm
ore,
th
e an
alys
is of
th
e Pr
ojec
t’s
impa
cts
to
cultu
ral
reso
urce
s co
nclu
ded
that
, th
roug
h th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
reco
mm
ende
d ab
ove,
pro
ject
-rela
ted
impa
cts t
o cu
ltura
l res
ourc
es w
ould
be
less
th
an s
igni
fican
t. T
here
fore
, the
Pro
ject
wou
ld n
ot c
ontri
bute
to a
ny p
oten
tial
cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts,
and
cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts
to c
ultu
ral r
esou
rces
wou
ld b
e le
ss
than
sign
ifica
nt a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
GEO
LOG
Y &
SO
ILS
(GEO
)
Impa
ct G
EO
-1 F
ault
Rupt
ure
The
Proj
ect s
ite is
not
loca
ted
with
in e
ither
Ear
thqu
ake
Faul
t Zon
es o
r Alq
uist-
Prio
lo H
azar
d Zo
nes
and
the
pote
ntia
l for
faul
t rup
ture
is c
onsid
ered
to b
e lo
w.
Ther
efor
e, P
roje
ct im
pact
s rel
ated
to fa
ult r
uptu
re w
ould
be
less
than
sign
ifica
nt
and
no m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct G
EO-2
Stro
ng S
eism
ic G
roun
d Sh
akin
g
The
Proj
ect s
ite is
loca
ted
in a
Sei
smic
Zon
e 4
base
d on
199
7 U
nifo
rm B
uild
ing
Code
(UBC
) and
200
1 Ca
lifor
nia
Build
ing
Code
(CBC
). H
owev
er, t
he P
roje
ct
appl
ican
t wou
ld b
e re
quire
d to
des
ign
and
cons
truct
the
Proj
ect i
n co
nfor
man
ce
to th
e m
ost r
ecen
tly a
dopt
ed C
BC d
esig
n pa
ram
eter
s and
the
Tow
n’s M
unic
ipal
Co
de f
or s
eism
ic d
esig
n.
Ther
efor
e, c
onfo
rman
ce w
ith c
urre
nt U
BC/C
BC
requ
irem
ents,
as
wel
l as
the
Tow
n’s
seism
ic d
esig
n re
quire
men
ts w
ould
redu
ce
the
pote
ntia
l fo
r str
uctu
res
on t
he P
roje
ct s
ite t
o su
stain
dam
age
durin
g an
ea
rthqu
ake
even
t, an
d Pr
ojec
t im
pact
s re
late
d to
gro
und
shak
ing
wou
ld b
e le
ss
than
sign
ifica
nt a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-35
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Impa
ct G
EO-3
Liq
uefa
ctio
n an
d So
il In
stabi
litie
s M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s GEO
-3a
thro
ugh
3c
Geo
tech
nica
l inv
estig
atio
n on
the
Proj
ect s
ite in
dica
tes t
hat:
1) u
p to
seve
n fe
et
of f
ine
to c
oars
e de
nse
undo
cum
ente
d fil
l is
pres
ent
at a
few
loc
atio
ns,
2)
tops
oil/a
lluvi
al d
epos
its c
onsis
ting
of lo
ose
sand
and
silt
y sa
nd b
lank
et th
e sit
e be
twee
n th
e de
pths
of a
ppro
xim
atel
y 1-
1/2
to 1
0 fe
et, a
nd 3
) per
ched
wat
er m
ay
deve
lop
at t
he s
ite.
Gro
und
failu
res
asso
ciat
ed w
ith s
oil
lique
fact
ion
incl
ude
post-
lique
fact
ion
reco
nsol
idat
ion,
late
ral s
prea
ding
, and
loss
of b
earin
g su
ppor
t.
Impa
cts w
ould
be
signi
fican
t. U
ndoc
umen
ted
fill a
nd lo
ose
tops
oil/a
lluvi
um a
re
loca
ted
on th
e Pr
ojec
t site
with
app
roxi
mat
e de
pth
max
imum
s of s
even
feet
and
te
n fe
et b
elow
the
grou
nds s
urfa
ce.
Ther
efor
e, re
mov
al o
f the
se so
ils m
ay c
ause
a
signi
fican
t im
pact
.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re G
EO-3
a L
ique
fact
ion
and
Soil
Inst
abili
ties
Prio
r to
issu
ance
of
build
ing
perm
its a
nd g
radi
ng a
ctiv
ities
, a d
esig
n le
vel g
eote
chni
cal
repo
rt sh
all b
e pr
epar
ed a
nd a
ll re
com
men
datio
ns in
the
repo
rt sh
all b
e ad
here
d to
. Th
e de
sign-
leve
l geo
tech
nica
l rep
ort s
hall
eval
uate
the
pote
ntia
l for
loca
lized
liqu
efac
tion
by
perfo
rmin
g su
pple
men
tal
subs
urfa
ce e
xplo
ratio
n (to
eva
luat
e th
e th
ickn
ess,
in p
lace
de
nsity
, fin
es c
onte
nt o
f th
e un
derly
ing
loos
e to
med
ium
soi
l and
gra
datio
n), l
abor
ator
y te
sting
, and
eng
inee
ring
anal
ysis.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re G
EO
-3b
Liq
uefa
ctio
n an
d So
il In
stab
ilitie
s
Impl
emen
t all
reco
mm
enda
tions
con
tain
ed w
ithin
thes
e sit
e-sp
ecifi
c ge
otec
hnic
al re
ports
, in
clud
ing
thos
e pe
rtain
ing
to s
ite p
repa
ratio
n, e
xcav
atio
n, fi
ll pl
acem
ent a
nd c
ompa
ctio
n;
foun
datio
ns;
conc
rete
sla
bs-o
n-gr
ade;
pav
emen
t de
sign;
lat
eral
ear
th p
ress
ures
and
re
sista
nce;
and
surfa
ce d
rain
age
cont
rol.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re G
EO-3
c L
ique
fact
ion
and
Soil
Inst
abili
ties
The
final
gra
ding
, dr
aina
ge,
and
foun
datio
n pl
ans
and
spec
ifica
tions
sha
ll be
pre
pare
d an
d/or
rev
iew
ed a
nd a
ppro
ved
by a
Reg
ister
ed G
eote
chni
cal
Engi
neer
and
Reg
ister
ed
Engi
neer
ing
Geo
logi
st.
In a
dditi
on,
upon
com
plet
ion
of c
onstr
uctio
n ac
tiviti
es,
the
Proj
ect
appl
ican
t sh
all
prov
ide
a fin
al s
tate
men
t in
dica
ting
whe
ther
the
wor
k w
as
perfo
rmed
in
ac
cord
ance
w
ith
Proj
ect
plan
s an
d sp
ecifi
catio
ns
and
with
th
e re
com
men
datio
ns o
f th
e Re
giste
red
Geo
tech
nica
l En
gine
er a
nd R
egist
ered
Eng
inee
ring
Geo
logi
st.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct G
EO
-4 C
yclic
Den
sific
atio
n
Cycl
ic s
oil d
ensif
icat
ion
is a
phen
omen
on in
whi
ch n
on-s
atur
ated
, coh
esio
nles
s so
il is
dens
ified
by
earth
quak
e vi
brat
ions
, res
ultin
g in
gro
und
surfa
ce se
ttlem
ent.
Cy
clic
den
sific
atio
n sh
ould
be
cons
ider
ed a
pot
entia
l min
or h
azar
d at
the
Proj
ect
site.
Dur
ing
a m
ajor
ear
thqu
ake
on a
nea
rby
porti
on o
f one
of t
he a
ctiv
e fa
ults,
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-36
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
stron
g gr
ound
sha
king
may
cau
se th
e lo
ose,
uns
atur
ated
allu
vial
soi
l to
dens
ify
and
settl
e. I
t is
estim
ated
that
up
to ½
inch
of c
yclic
den
sific
atio
n m
ay o
ccur
at
the
site.
Thi
s m
ay r
esul
t in
the
min
or s
urfa
ce i
mpr
ovem
ents,
suc
h as
min
or
crac
king
of
foun
datio
ns.
,Min
or c
rack
s in
fou
ndat
ion
and
othe
r m
inor
sur
face
im
prov
emen
ts w
ould
not
hav
e th
e po
tent
ial t
o re
pres
ent a
sub
stant
ial r
isk to
life
an
d pr
oper
ty.
Furth
erm
ore,
as
note
d, p
rior t
o iss
uanc
e of
bui
ldin
g pe
rmits
and
gr
adin
g ac
tiviti
es, a
des
ign
leve
l geo
tech
nica
l rep
ort s
hall
be p
repa
red
and
all
reco
mm
enda
tions
in
th
e re
port
shal
l be
ad
here
d to
. Th
eref
ore,
cy
clic
de
nsifi
catio
n do
es n
ot r
epre
sent
a s
igni
fican
t im
pact
und
er C
EQA
. I
mpa
cts
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Impa
ct G
EO
-5 L
ands
lides
and
Ava
lanc
hes
The
pote
ntia
l for
roc
k fa
lls o
r sn
ow a
vala
nche
s to
occ
ur o
n th
e Pr
ojec
t site
is
cons
ider
ed lo
w b
ecau
se th
e sit
e is
not a
djac
ent t
o th
e ba
se o
f a
steep
slo
pe o
r w
ithin
clo
se p
roxi
mity
to a
n ar
ea o
f ava
lanc
he fl
ow.
Fur
ther
mor
e, n
o ev
iden
ce
of p
ast
land
slide
s ha
s be
en o
bser
ved.
T
here
fore
, Pro
ject
im
pact
s re
late
d to
la
ndsli
des
and
aval
anch
es w
ould
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant
and
no m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct G
EO-6
Vol
cani
c Ac
tivity
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
GEO
-6
A sm
all t
o m
oder
ate
volc
anic
eru
ptio
n co
uld
occu
r som
ewhe
re a
long
the
Mon
o-In
yo C
rate
rs v
olca
nic
chai
n pr
oduc
ing
pyro
clas
tic f
low
s an
d su
rges
as
wel
l as
volc
anic
ash
and
pum
ice
fallo
ut th
at c
ould
sig
nific
antly
impa
ct th
e Pr
ojec
t site
. A
lthou
gh t
his
risk
is pr
esen
t th
roug
hout
the
Tow
n an
d su
rroun
ding
are
as,
Proj
ect i
mpa
cts r
elat
ed to
vol
cani
c ac
tivity
wou
ld b
e sig
nific
ant.
The
Proj
ect a
pplic
ant s
hall
prep
are
an e
mer
genc
y ev
acua
tion
plan
in c
onsu
ltatio
n w
ith th
e To
wn
in o
rder
to p
rovi
de fo
r the
ord
erly
eva
cuat
ion
of th
e Pr
ojec
t site
in c
ase
the
pote
ntia
l fo
r vol
cani
c ha
zard
s inc
reas
es a
nd re
siden
ts ne
ed to
vac
ate
the
Proj
ect s
ite.
Impa
ct G
EO
-7 C
arbo
n M
onox
ide
As
prev
ious
ly n
oted
, hig
h co
ncen
tratio
ns o
f ca
rbon
dio
xide
are
loca
ted
with
in
isola
ted
area
s of t
he T
own,
pro
min
ently
Hor
sesh
oe L
ake.
Car
bon
diox
ide
pose
s N
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
Le
ss T
han
Sign
ifica
nt
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-37
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
a he
alth
risk
whe
n co
llect
ed a
t hig
h co
ncen
tratio
ns in
low
er p
arts
of d
epre
ssio
ns
and
encl
osur
es.
How
ever
, onc
e th
e ca
rbon
dio
xide
is a
ble
to d
isper
se w
ithin
the
atm
osph
ere,
the
re i
s no
lon
ger
a he
alth
risk
. T
he P
roje
ct s
ite i
s lo
cate
d ap
prox
imat
ely
two
an h
alf
mile
s fro
m th
e cl
oses
t iso
late
d ar
ea o
f hi
gh c
arbo
n di
oxid
e co
ncen
tratio
ns,
as s
uch
the
carb
on d
ioxi
de w
ould
disp
erse
bef
ore
arriv
ing
at th
e Pr
ojec
t site
. T
he P
roje
ct s
ite is
not
loca
ted
in a
n ar
ea a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith h
igh
leve
ls of
car
bon
diox
ide.
Th
eref
ore,
im
pact
s w
ould
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
Impa
ct G
EO
-8 S
oil E
rosio
n/Lo
ss o
f Top
soil
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re G
EO
-8
The
Proj
ect s
ite w
ould
requ
ire g
radi
ng a
nd e
arth
wor
k an
d w
ould
be
subj
ect t
o so
il er
osio
n an
d lo
ss o
f top
soil.
Re
mov
al o
f uns
uita
ble
soils
from
all
build
ing
loca
tions
sha
ll ex
tend
bel
ow t
he u
nsui
tabl
e m
ater
ial
and
to a
min
imum
ho
rizon
tal
dista
nce
of o
ne-h
alf
the
foot
ing
wid
th o
r fiv
e fe
et (
whi
chev
er i
s gr
eate
r) ho
rizon
tally
ou
tside
th
e fo
otin
g fo
otpr
int.
Fu
rther
mor
e,
pave
d ro
adw
ays
and
park
ing
area
s ar
e re
com
men
ded
a re
mov
al o
f on
e to
thre
e fe
et.
A
dditi
onal
ly, e
rosio
n an
d lo
ss o
f top
soil
is po
ssib
le su
rroun
ding
the
struc
ture
s if
left
unpr
otec
ted
durin
g th
e sn
owm
elt s
easo
n. W
ithou
t pro
per i
mpl
emen
tatio
n of
er
osio
n co
ntro
l mea
sure
s du
ring
cons
truct
ion
and
oper
atio
n of
the
Proj
ect,
the
site
coul
d su
stain
soi
l ero
sion
and
loss
of t
opso
il. T
his
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
a
signi
fican
t im
pact
.
The
follo
win
g m
easu
res s
hall
be im
plem
ente
d to
pre
vent
soil
eros
ion
and
loss
of t
opso
il:
• A
Sto
rm W
ater
Pol
lutio
n Pr
even
tion
Plan
(SW
PPP)
sha
ll be
pre
pare
d w
ith t
he
grad
ing
plan
s to
fulfi
ll re
gula
tory
requ
irem
ents.
• Pe
rman
ent
eros
ion
cont
rol
mea
sure
s sh
all
be p
lace
d on
all
grad
ed s
lope
s. N
o gr
aded
are
as sh
all b
e le
ft un
stabi
lized
bet
wee
n O
ctob
er 1
5th
and
Apr
il 15
th.
• Fi
nish
gra
ding
for
all
build
ing
area
s sh
all
allo
w f
or a
ll dr
aina
ge w
ater
fro
m t
he
build
ing
area
to d
rain
aw
ay fr
om b
uild
ing
foun
datio
ns (t
wo
perc
ent m
inim
um g
rade
on
soil
or so
d fo
r a d
istan
ce o
f fiv
e fe
et).
Pon
ding
of w
ater
shal
l not
be
perm
itted
.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct G
EO
-9 E
xpan
sive
Soils
Expa
nsiv
e so
ils c
onta
in c
lay
min
eral
s th
at a
ttrac
t and
abs
orb
wat
er.
The
soils
sw
ell
whe
n su
bjec
ted
to
moi
sture
, ca
usin
g str
uctu
ral
prob
lem
s th
roug
h di
ffere
ntia
l mov
emen
t. A
s not
ed, t
he P
roje
ct si
te c
onsis
ts of
silty
to c
laye
y, v
ery
fine
to c
oars
e gr
aine
d so
ils w
hich
are
not
con
sider
ed e
xpan
sive
soils
. Th
eref
ore,
no
exp
ansiv
e so
ils h
ave
been
map
ped
or e
ncou
nter
ed in
the
Tow
n. T
here
fore
, Pr
ojec
t im
pact
s re
late
d to
exp
ansiv
e so
ils w
ould
be
less
than
sig
nific
ant a
nd n
o
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-38
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Impa
ct G
EO
-10
Sep
tic T
anks
or A
ltern
ativ
e W
aste
Wat
er D
ispos
al S
yste
ms
No
sept
ic ta
nks o
r alte
rnat
ive
was
ter w
ater
disp
osal
syste
ms a
re p
ropo
sed
as p
art
of t
he P
roje
ct.
The
refo
re,
Proj
ect
impa
cts
rela
ted
to s
oils
inca
pabl
e of
su
ppor
ting
thes
e us
es w
ould
be
less
than
sign
ifica
nt a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s ar
e re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct G
EO-1
1 C
umul
ativ
e Im
pact
s
Geo
tech
nica
l im
pact
s re
late
d to
futu
re d
evel
opm
ent i
n th
e To
wn
wou
ld in
volv
e ha
zard
s as
soci
ated
with
site
-spe
cific
soi
l con
ditio
ns, i
nclu
ding
ero
sion,
vol
cani
c ac
tivity
, an
d gr
ound
-sha
king
du
ring
earth
quak
es.
Th
e Pr
ojec
t w
ould
in
corp
orat
e Be
st M
anag
emen
t Pra
ctic
es (i
nclu
ding
the
prep
arat
ion
of a
SW
PPP)
th
at w
ould
red
uce
or e
limin
ate
impa
cts
from
ero
sion.
A
lthou
gh t
he P
roje
ct
wou
ld r
esul
t in
the
addi
tion
of p
eopl
e to
the
Proj
ect a
rea,
the
risk
of s
eism
ic
shak
ing
wou
ld b
e no
gre
ater
than
oth
er a
reas
of t
he T
own
of M
amm
oth
Lake
s.
The
impa
cts
on e
ach
site
wou
ld b
e sp
ecifi
c to
that
site
and
its
user
s an
d w
ould
no
t be
com
mon
or
cont
ribut
e to
(or
sha
red
with
, in
an
addi
tive
sens
e) t
he
impa
cts o
n ot
her s
ites.
In a
dditi
on, a
ll de
velo
pmen
t on
the
Proj
ect s
ite w
ould
be
subj
ect
to u
nifo
rm s
ite d
evel
opm
ent
and
cons
truct
ion
stand
ards
tha
t ar
e de
signe
d to
pro
tect
pub
lic s
afet
y.
Ther
efor
e, c
umul
ativ
e ge
olog
y an
d so
il im
pact
s wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
HY
DR
OLO
GY
& W
ATE
R Q
UA
LITY
(HY
D)
Impa
ct H
YD-1
Wat
er Q
ualit
y St
anda
rds
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re H
YD-1
Cons
truct
ion
Rela
ted
Impa
cts
The
requ
ired
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
BM
Ps i
n th
e Pr
ojec
t’s S
WPP
P w
ould
en
sure
that
Pro
ject
con
struc
tion
activ
ities
with
in th
e Pr
ojec
t site
wou
ld n
ot c
ause
The
golf
cour
se e
xpan
sion
(Are
as E
2, E
4, a
nd F
) are
a m
ay b
e irr
igat
ed w
ith re
clai
med
or
pota
ble
wat
er. A
t thi
s tim
e, m
itiga
tion
requ
irem
ents
for t
he u
se o
f re
clai
med
wat
er h
ave
not b
een
dete
rmin
ed.
How
ever
, if r
ecla
imed
wat
er is
use
d fo
r irri
gatio
n, o
ptio
ns s
hall
be
expl
ored
to
limit
recl
aim
ed w
ater
fro
m e
nter
ing
the
tribu
tary
are
a th
at f
low
s to
war
d
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-39
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
the
viol
atio
n of
any
wat
er q
ualit
y sta
ndar
ds w
ithin
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek.
Thu
s, th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
to h
ave
a le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
impa
ct o
n th
e ab
ility
of
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek
to a
ttain
all
appl
icab
le w
ater
qua
lity
stand
ards
.
Ope
ratio
n-Re
late
d Im
pact
s
Act
iviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith o
pera
tion
of t
he P
roje
ct w
ould
gen
erat
e su
bsta
nces
th
at c
ould
deg
rade
the
qua
lity
of w
ater
run
off.
Alth
ough
the
disc
harg
e of
sto
rmw
ater
from
the
deve
lope
d po
rtion
s of
the
Proj
ect s
ite to
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek
is ex
pect
ed t
o be
an
extre
mel
y ra
re e
vent
, im
plem
enta
tion
of M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
HY
D-1
bel
ow w
ould
red
uce
pote
ntia
l ope
ratio
nal P
roje
ct im
pact
s on
w
ater
qua
lity
in M
amm
oth
Cree
k to
a le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
leve
l.
Mam
mot
h C
reek
. Th
ese
mea
sure
s cou
ld in
clud
e:
• Irr
igat
e al
l ret
entio
n ba
sins a
nd th
e sw
ale
from
the
rete
ntio
n ba
sins (
loca
ted
to th
e w
est o
f She
rwin
Cre
ek R
oad)
usin
g po
tabl
e w
ater
.
• Irr
igat
e an
y la
ndsc
apin
g w
ithin
or
dire
ctly
trib
utar
y to
the
se f
eatu
res
whi
ch
requ
ires
irrig
atio
n us
ing
pota
ble
wat
er. G
olf
cour
se a
reas
imm
edia
tely
sou
th o
f th
e ba
sins
shal
l be
con
struc
ted
to r
etai
n al
l sto
rmw
ater
run
off
and
shal
l no
t ov
erflo
w to
the
basin
s.
• In
crea
se c
apac
ity o
f on
-site
ret
entio
n fo
r th
e go
lf co
urse
are
as i
rriga
ted
with
re
clai
med
wat
er to
incl
ude
capa
city
for a
stor
m o
f 100
-yea
r int
ensit
y.
• G
rade
sou
thea
sterly
lim
its o
f the
gol
f cou
rse
expa
nsio
n ar
ea in
som
e lo
catio
ns to
bl
ock
tribu
tary
dra
inag
e fro
m th
e so
uth
and
dire
ct it
eas
t tow
ard
Sher
win
Cre
ek
Road
.
At t
his s
tage
, it i
s unk
now
n if
it w
ill b
e re
quire
d to
lim
it re
clai
med
wat
er fr
om e
nter
ing
the
tribu
tary
are
a th
at f
low
s to
war
d M
amm
oth
Cree
k.
The
final
det
erm
inat
ion
of o
utflo
w
cond
ition
s if
recl
aim
ed w
ater
is u
sed
will
be
mad
e du
ring
the
final
des
ign
in c
oord
inat
ion
with
the
RW
QCB
and
oth
er a
pplic
able
age
ncie
s. I
n th
e ev
ent
that
rec
laim
ed w
ater
is
used
, the
abo
ve m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s w
ill b
e im
plem
ente
d to
avo
id a
ny i
mpa
cts
to t
he
wat
er q
ualit
y of
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek.
In c
onsu
ltatio
n w
ith th
e To
wn,
the
Proj
ect a
pplic
ant s
hall
iden
tify
and
impl
emen
t a s
uite
of
sto
rmw
ater
qua
lity
BMPs
des
igne
d to
add
ress
the
mos
t lik
ely
sour
ces
of s
torm
wat
er
pollu
tant
s re
sulti
ng f
rom
ope
ratio
n of
the
pro
pose
d de
velo
pmen
t pr
ojec
ts w
ithin
the
pr
opos
ed P
roje
ct a
rea.
Po
lluta
nt s
ourc
es a
nd p
athw
ays
to b
e ad
dres
sed
by th
ese
BM
Ps
incl
ude,
but
are
not
nec
essa
rily
limite
d to
, par
king
lots,
mai
nten
ance
are
as, t
rash
sto
rage
lo
catio
ns, r
oofto
ps, i
nter
ior p
ublic
and
priv
ate
road
way
s, th
e go
lf co
urse
, and
sto
rm d
rain
in
lets.
Th
ese
BMPs
sha
ll in
clud
e de
tent
ion
and
sedi
men
tatio
n ba
sins
as w
ell
as
infil
tratio
n de
vice
s de
signe
d to
filt
er r
unof
f fro
m p
aved
are
as o
n th
e Pr
ojec
t sit
e.
The
desig
n an
d lo
catio
n of
thes
e BM
Ps w
ill b
e su
bjec
t to
revi
ew a
nd c
omm
ent b
y th
e To
wn
but
shal
l ge
nera
lly a
dher
e to
the
sta
ndar
ds a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith t
he P
hase
II
NPD
ES
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-40
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
storm
wat
er p
erm
it pr
ogra
m.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
thes
e BM
Ps sh
all b
e as
sure
d by
the
Com
mun
ity D
evel
opm
ent D
irect
or
and
Tow
n En
gine
er p
rior
to th
e iss
uanc
e of
Gra
ding
or
Build
ing
Perm
its.
Com
plia
nce
with
the
se m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s w
ould
red
uce
pote
ntia
l im
pact
s re
sulti
ng f
rom
Pro
ject
op
erat
ion
on re
ceiv
ing
wat
er q
ualit
y in
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek
to a
less
than
sign
ifica
nt le
vel.
Impa
ct H
YD-2
Gro
undw
ater
Dep
letio
n or
Rec
harg
e M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
HYD
-2
A s
igni
fican
t im
pact
may
occ
ur i
f a
Proj
ect
wou
ld s
ubsta
ntia
lly d
eple
te
grou
ndw
ater
sup
plie
s or
inte
rfere
sub
stant
ially
with
gro
undw
ater
rech
arge
suc
h th
at th
ere
wou
ld b
e a
net d
efic
it in
aqu
ifer
volu
me
or a
low
erin
g of
the
loca
l gr
ound
wat
er ta
ble
leve
l.
Cons
truct
ion-
Rela
ted
Impa
cts
Gro
undw
ater
see
page
was
enc
ount
ered
at t
he P
roje
ct s
ite a
t dep
ths
as h
igh
as 2
fe
et a
nd a
s lo
w a
s 8.
5 fe
et b
elow
the
exist
ing
grad
e.
Gro
undw
ater
con
ditio
ns
ofte
n flu
ctua
te s
easo
nally
and
dep
ths
reco
rded
may
not
nec
essa
rily
be re
flect
ive
of g
roun
dwat
er e
leva
tions
dur
ing
cons
truct
ion.
G
roun
dwat
er p
umpe
d du
ring
cons
truct
ion
from
the
Pro
ject
site
wou
ld n
ot b
e ex
tens
ive
and
wou
ld b
e co
nvey
ed to
one
of t
he e
xisti
ng re
tent
ion
basin
s lo
cate
d w
ithin
the
exist
ing
golf
cour
se a
rea.
Th
is am
ount
of
grou
ndw
ater
pum
ping
wou
ld n
ot b
e su
bsta
ntia
l en
ough
to
depl
ete
or i
nter
fere
with
gro
undw
ater
rec
harg
e an
d w
ould
be
cons
ider
ed le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
.
Ope
ratio
n-Re
late
d Im
pact
s
The
site
is su
bjec
t to
high
gro
undw
ater
. D
ue to
typi
cal h
eavy
snow
pack
mel
ting
in th
e sp
ring,
nea
rly a
ll sit
es in
Mam
mot
h La
kes
are
subj
ect t
o se
ason
al h
igh
grou
ndw
ater
and
stru
ctur
es n
eed
to b
e pr
otec
ted
from
hig
h gr
ound
wat
er le
vels.
Th
e pr
opos
ed r
eten
tion
basin
s al
ong
Old
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad h
ave
been
siz
ed to
re
tain
and
inf
iltra
te r
unof
f fro
m t
he r
esid
entia
l/com
mer
cial
are
as w
ithin
the
Pr
ojec
t as
wel
l as
run
off
from
oth
er p
rior
off-s
ite d
evel
opm
ents
whi
ch a
re
All
unde
rgro
und
struc
ture
s sh
all b
e de
signe
d w
ith e
xter
ior
wal
l dra
in b
oard
to a
foo
ting
drai
n sy
stem
as
wel
l as
unde
rsla
b su
bdra
ins.
Cra
wl s
pace
s sh
all b
e pr
otec
ted
with
pro
per
vent
ilatio
n an
d su
bdra
ins.
The
sys
tem
sha
ll be
des
igne
d su
ch t
hat
subd
rain
s sh
all
be
desig
ned
with
out
let s
yste
ms
that
hav
e m
axim
um w
ater
sur
face
ele
vatio
ns lo
wer
than
the
botto
m o
f the
sub
drai
ns to
ens
ure
that
sub
drai
ns w
ould
not
be
inun
date
d w
ith s
torm
wat
er
whe
n re
tent
ion
basin
s re
ach
capa
city
. Su
bdra
in d
esig
n sh
all
be b
ased
on
final
Pro
ject
de
sign
and
shal
l be
ade
quat
ely
sized
so
that
ret
entio
n ba
sin c
apac
ity i
s m
aint
aine
d fo
r sto
rmw
ater
rete
ntio
n pu
rpos
es.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
this
mea
sure
wou
ld re
duce
this
impa
ct
to a
less
than
sign
ifica
nt le
vel.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-41
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
tribu
tary
to th
ese
basin
s. T
he d
irect
ion
of ru
noff
from
the
incr
ease
d im
perv
ious
su
rface
are
as o
f th
e Pr
ojec
t to
the
se b
asin
s w
ould
pro
vide
for
gro
undw
ater
re
char
ge a
nd w
ould
red
uce
oper
atio
n-re
late
d im
pact
s co
ncer
ning
gro
undw
ater
re
char
ge to
a le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
leve
l.
Impa
ct H
YD-3
Dra
inag
e Pa
ttern
Alte
ratio
n
Cons
truct
ion-
Rela
ted
Impa
cts
Dev
elop
men
t of
the
curre
ntly
und
evel
oped
are
as w
ithin
the
Proj
ect s
ite w
ould
re
sult
in t
he m
odifi
catio
n of
exi
sting
dra
inag
e pa
ths
and
a hi
gher
am
ount
of
surfa
ce r
unof
f th
an i
s cu
rrent
ly g
ener
ated
by
thes
e ar
eas.
The
req
uire
d im
plem
enta
tion
of t
he B
est
Man
agem
ent
Prac
tices
(B
MPs
) in
the
Pro
ject
’s
cons
truct
ion
SWPP
P w
ould
ens
ure
that
Pro
ject
con
struc
tion
activ
ities
with
in th
e sit
e w
ould
not
cau
se su
bsta
ntia
l ero
sion
or si
ltatio
n on
- or o
ff-sit
e. T
hese
BM
Ps
wou
ld i
nclu
de, a
t a
min
imum
, su
ch m
easu
res
as l
imiti
ng s
ite g
radi
ng t
o dr
y sp
ring,
sum
mer
and
fall
mon
ths a
nd si
ltatio
n co
ntro
ls.
Ope
ratio
n-Re
late
d Im
pact
s
Act
iviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e op
erat
ion
of th
e Pr
ojec
t are
not
con
sider
ed li
kely
to
sub
stant
ially
inc
reas
e on
- or
off-
site
eros
ion
or s
iltat
ion.
N
onet
hele
ss, t
he
prop
osed
in
stalla
tion
of
perm
anen
t sto
rm
cont
rol
faci
litie
s an
d se
dim
enta
tion/
infil
tratio
n ba
sins
will
red
uce
Proj
ect-g
ener
ated
ero
sion
and
silta
tion
impa
cts
(see
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re H
YD
-1).
No
signi
fican
t im
pact
s pe
rtain
ing
to P
roje
ct o
pera
tion-
gene
rate
d er
osio
n an
d sil
tatio
n ar
e an
ticip
ated
to
resu
lt fro
m n
ew d
evel
opm
ent a
t the
Pro
ject
site
.
Thus
, th
e Pr
ojec
t w
ould
hav
e a
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant
impa
ct i
n te
rms
of
incr
easin
g on
- or o
ff-sit
e er
osio
n an
d sil
tatio
n th
roug
h th
e al
tera
tion
of e
xisti
ng
drai
nage
pat
tern
s.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-42
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Impa
ct H
YD-4
Dra
inag
e Sy
stem
Cap
acity
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
HYD
-4
The
Proj
ect w
ould
cre
ate
43 a
cres
of
impe
rvio
us s
urfa
ces
cons
istin
g of
roo
fs,
driv
es, a
nd p
arki
ng a
reas
. The
Pro
ject
wou
ld i
nclu
de 2
4 ac
res
of l
ands
cape
d ar
eas.
Com
plia
nce
with
the
miti
gatio
n m
easu
re b
elow
wou
ld r
educ
e po
tent
ial
impa
cts r
esul
ting
from
Pro
ject
ope
ratio
n to
a le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
leve
l.
In c
onsu
ltatio
n w
ith th
e To
wn
of M
amm
oth
Lake
s an
d R
WQ
CB, a
nd s
ubje
ct to
Tow
n ap
prov
al,
the
Proj
ect
appl
ican
t sh
all
iden
tify
and
impl
emen
t a
suite
of
storm
dra
inag
e fa
cilit
ies
desig
ned
to s
afel
y ca
ptur
e, t
reat
, and
con
vey
runo
ff fro
m t
he r
equi
red
desig
n sto
rms.
In
addi
tion,
a d
etai
led
set
of m
aint
enan
ce p
roce
dure
s ne
cess
ary
to a
ssur
e th
at
storm
dra
inag
e fa
cilit
ies
cont
inue
to w
ork
as d
esig
ned
shal
l be
esta
blish
ed a
nd a
ppro
ved
by th
e To
wn,
in c
onsu
ltatio
n w
ith th
e RW
QCB
. Pa
rticu
lar i
tem
s re
quiri
ng m
aint
enan
ce
incl
ude,
but
are
not
lim
ited
to, c
lean
ing
of g
rate
s, re
mov
al o
f for
eign
mat
eria
ls fro
m st
orm
dr
aina
ge p
ipes
, mai
nten
ance
as
nece
ssar
y fo
r ou
tlet
faci
litie
s an
d re
tent
ion
basin
s, an
d re
pairs
as n
eces
sary
to d
amag
ed fa
cilit
ies.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct H
YD-5
100
Yea
r Flo
od H
azar
d
A si
gnifi
cant
impa
ct m
ay o
ccur
if a
Pro
ject
wou
ld p
lace
stru
ctur
es w
hich
wou
ld
impe
de o
r red
irect
floo
d w
ater
s in
a 1
00-y
ear f
lood
zon
e. T
here
is n
o 10
0-ye
ar
flood
zon
e so
uth
of O
ld M
amm
oth
Road
and
wes
t of S
herw
in C
reek
Roa
d. A
sm
all
porti
on o
f th
e Pr
ojec
t sit
e no
rth o
f O
ld M
amm
oth
Road
whe
re t
he
Mar
ket/G
ener
al S
tore
wou
ld b
e lo
cate
d is
adja
cent
to M
amm
oth
Cree
k an
d is
with
in a
100
-yea
r flo
od z
one.
How
ever
, all
deve
lopm
ent i
n th
is po
rtion
of t
he
Proj
ect s
ite w
ould
be
plac
ed o
utsid
e th
e 10
0-ye
ar fl
ood
zone
. Th
us, t
he P
roje
ct
wou
ld h
ave
a le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
impa
ct w
ith re
spec
t to
flood
haz
ards
.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct H
YD-6
Cum
ulat
ive
Impa
cts
Dev
elop
men
t of
the
Pro
ject
in
com
bina
tion
with
the
rel
ated
pro
ject
s w
ould
re
sult
in th
e fu
rther
infil
ling
of u
ses
with
in th
e U
rban
Gro
wth
Bou
ndar
y.
The
surro
undi
ng a
rea
prim
arily
con
sists
of a
pat
chw
ork
of u
ndev
elop
ed a
reas
and
de
velo
ped
impe
rvio
us u
rban
ized
surfa
ces,
and
is se
rved
by
exist
ing
storm
dra
ins
that
wou
ld b
e ex
pand
ed i
n or
der
to s
erve
new
dev
elop
men
t. I
t is
likel
y th
at
mos
t of t
he re
late
d pr
ojec
ts w
ould
dra
in to
the
Tow
n’s
storm
dra
in s
yste
m a
nd
ultim
atel
y to
Mam
mot
h Cr
eek.
Ea
ch i
ndiv
idua
l re
late
d pr
ojec
t w
ould
be
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-43
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
requ
ired
to s
ubm
it a
drai
nage
ana
lysis
to
the
Tow
n.
Each
dra
inag
e an
alys
is m
ust i
llustr
ate
how
pea
k flo
ws
gene
rate
d fro
m e
ach
rela
ted
Proj
ect s
ite w
ould
be
acc
omm
odat
ed b
y th
e To
wn’
s ex
istin
g an
d/or
pro
pose
d sto
rm d
rain
age
faci
litie
s. W
here
nec
essa
ry, e
ach
rela
ted
proj
ect w
ould
be
requ
ired
to in
clud
e de
tent
ion
or in
filtra
tion
feat
ures
des
igne
d to
redu
ce th
e to
tal r
ate
and/
or v
olum
e of
runo
ff ge
nera
ted
at it
s sit
e. l
l rel
ated
pro
ject
s th
at d
istur
b on
e ac
re o
r mor
e m
ust a
lso o
btai
n co
vera
ge u
nder
the
GC
ASW
P, in
clud
ing
the
prep
arat
ion
and
subm
ittal
of a
SW
PPP
to g
over
n al
l con
struc
tion
activ
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
eac
h pr
ojec
t.
As
a re
sult,
cu
mul
ativ
ely
cons
ider
able
w
ater
qu
ality
an
d er
osio
n/sil
tatio
n im
pact
s wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
.
LA
ND
USE
AN
D P
LA
NN
ING
(LU
)
Impa
ct L
U-1
Co
nsist
ency
with
App
licab
le L
and
Use
Pla
ns,
Polic
ies,
or
Regu
latio
ns
As
note
d, t
he P
roje
ct i
s ge
nera
lly c
onsis
tent
with
and
im
plem
ents
appl
icab
le
plan
s an
d po
licie
s. T
he P
roje
ct s
ite i
s cu
rrent
ly g
over
ned
by t
he l
and
use
polic
ies
and
regu
latio
ns s
et f
orth
in th
e G
ener
al P
lan
(198
7 an
d 20
07 G
ener
al
Plan
), th
e Sn
owcr
eek
Mas
ter P
lan
(ado
pted
in 1
974
and
amen
ded
in 1
981)
and
th
e To
wn
of M
amm
oth
Lake
s Zon
ing
Ord
inan
ce.
Due
to
cons
isten
cy w
ith v
irtua
lly a
ll of
the
198
7 an
d 20
07 G
ener
al P
lan
polic
ies,
impa
cts
of th
e Pr
ojec
t w
ould
be
less
than
sig
nific
ant a
nd w
ould
not
re
quire
miti
gatio
n.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct L
U-2
Cum
ulat
ive
Impa
cts
Cum
ulat
ive
land
use
impa
cts c
ould
occ
ur if
oth
er re
late
d pr
ojec
ts in
the
Tow
n of
M
amm
oth
Lake
s w
ould
res
ult
in l
and
use
impa
cts
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith t
he
Proj
ect.
Of t
he 4
1 re
late
d pr
ojec
ts, 3
4 ar
e re
siden
tial p
roje
cts l
ocat
ed w
ithin
the
Tow
n.
The
Proj
ect,
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith o
ther
pro
ject
s, is
loca
ted
with
in a
n
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-44
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
urba
nize
d ar
ea a
nd w
ould
not
be
grea
t en
ough
in
size
or e
xten
t to
div
ide
an
esta
blish
ed c
omm
unity
. Th
e Pr
ojec
t site
and
its
vici
nity
are
not
loca
ted
with
in
an a
rea
cove
red
by a
Hab
itat
Cons
erva
tion
Plan
or
Nat
ural
Com
mun
ity
Cons
erva
tion
Plan
and
, th
eref
ore,
wou
ld n
ot c
ontri
bute
to
any
cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts t
o H
abita
t Con
serv
atio
n Pl
ans.
The
Proj
ect
is co
nsist
ent
with
lot
cov
erag
e as
def
ined
by
the
Gen
eral
Pla
n.
Add
ition
ally
, onc
e th
e Zo
ning
Cod
e re
visio
ns a
re a
ppro
ved,
the
heig
ht o
f th
e pr
opos
ed H
otel
com
pone
nt o
f th
e Pr
ojec
t w
ould
be
cons
isten
t w
ith h
eigh
t lim
itatio
ns a
s allo
wed
in th
e Zo
ning
Cod
e. E
ach
of th
ese
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld
be re
quire
d to
dem
onstr
ate
cons
isten
cy w
ith th
e go
als,
polic
ies,
and
obje
ctiv
es
of t
he G
ener
al P
lan,
and
oth
er a
pplic
able
reg
iona
l pl
ans
and
to d
eter
min
e w
heth
er t
hey
wou
ld r
esul
t in
env
ironm
enta
l im
pact
s. T
here
fore
, th
e Pr
ojec
t w
ould
not
con
tribu
te to
any
cum
ulat
ive
land
use
impa
cts
and
this
impa
ct w
ould
be
less
than
sign
ifica
nt.
NO
ISE
Impa
ct N
OIS
E-1
Exp
osur
e of
Per
sons
to E
xces
sive
Noi
se L
evel
s M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s NO
ISE-
1a th
roug
h 1c
Cons
truct
ion
Noi
se
Cons
truct
ion
of th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld r
equi
re th
e us
e of
hea
vy e
quip
men
t for
site
gr
adin
g an
d ex
cava
tion,
insta
llatio
n of
util
ities
, pav
ing,
and
bui
ldin
g fa
bric
atio
n.
Dev
elop
men
t ac
tiviti
es w
ould
also
inv
olve
the
use
of
smal
ler
pow
er t
ools,
ge
nera
tors
, and
oth
er so
urce
s of n
oise
. D
urin
g ea
ch st
age
of d
evel
opm
ent,
ther
e w
ould
be
a di
ffere
nt m
ix o
f eq
uipm
ent o
pera
ting
and
noise
leve
ls w
ould
var
y ba
sed
on th
e am
ount
of e
quip
men
t in
oper
atio
n an
d th
e lo
catio
n of
the
activ
ity.
Dep
endi
ng
on
the
dista
nce
of
near
by
off-s
ite
uses
to
th
e Pr
ojec
t sit
e,
impl
emen
tatio
n of
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
NO
ISE-
1a t
hrou
gh N
OIS
E-1c
wou
ld
ensu
re t
hat
noise
lev
els
are
belo
w t
he T
own’
s m
axim
um e
xter
ior
noise
sta
ndar
ds fo
r con
struc
tion
activ
ity, r
esul
ting
in a
less
than
sign
ifica
nt im
pact
.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re N
OIS
E-1a
Exp
osur
e of
Per
sons
to E
xces
sive
Noi
se L
evel
s
Cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
sha
ll be
lim
ited
to b
etw
een
the
hour
s of
7 A
.M.
and
8 P.
M.,
Mon
day
thro
ugh
Satu
rday
. W
ork
hour
s on
Sun
days
and
Tow
n re
cogn
ized
hol
iday
s sh
all
be li
mite
d to
the
hour
s be
twee
n 9
A.M
. and
5 P
.M.,
and
shal
l be
perm
itted
onl
y w
ith th
e ap
prov
al o
f the
bui
ldin
g of
ficia
l or d
esig
nee.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re N
OIS
E-1b
Exp
osur
e of
Per
sons
to E
xces
sive
Noi
se L
evel
s
Proj
ect d
evel
oper
s sh
all r
equi
re b
y co
ntra
ct s
peci
ficat
ions
that
the
follo
win
g co
nstru
ctio
n be
st m
anag
emen
t pra
ctic
es (B
MPs
) be
impl
emen
ted
by c
ontra
ctor
s to
redu
ce c
onstr
uctio
n no
ise le
vels:
• Pr
ovid
e ad
vanc
e no
tific
atio
n of
con
struc
tion
to th
e im
med
iate
sur
roun
ding
land
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-45
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
uses
aro
und
a de
velo
pmen
t site
• En
sure
tha
t co
nstru
ctio
n eq
uipm
ent
is pr
oper
ly m
uffle
d ac
cord
ing
to i
ndus
try
stand
ards
• Pl
ace
noise
-gen
erat
ing
cons
truct
ion
equi
pmen
t an
d lo
cate
con
struc
tion
stagi
ng
area
s aw
ay fr
om re
siden
ces,
whe
re fe
asib
le
• Sc
hedu
le h
igh
noise
-pro
duci
ng a
ctiv
ities
bet
wee
n th
e ho
urs o
f 8 A
.M. a
nd 5
P.M
. to
min
imiz
e di
srup
tion
on se
nsiti
ve u
ses
• Im
plem
ent n
oise
atte
nuat
ion
mea
sure
s to
the
exte
nt fe
asib
le, w
hich
may
incl
ude,
bu
t are
not
lim
ited
to, n
oise
bar
riers
or n
oise
bla
nket
s
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re N
OIS
E-1c
Exp
osur
e of
Per
sons
to E
xces
sive
Noi
se L
evel
s
Proj
ect d
evel
oper
s sh
all r
equi
re b
y co
ntra
ct s
peci
ficat
ions
that
con
struc
tion
stagi
ng a
reas
w
ithin
the
Pro
ject
site
wou
ld b
e lo
cate
d as
far
aw
ay f
rom
vib
ratio
n-se
nsiti
ve s
ites
as
feas
ible
.
Impa
ct N
OIS
E-2
Exc
essiv
e Co
nstru
ctio
n-Re
late
d G
roun
dbor
ne V
ibra
tion
Cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
that
wou
ld o
ccur
with
in th
e Pr
ojec
t site
wou
ld in
clud
e gr
adin
g an
d ex
cava
tion
whi
ch w
ould
hav
e th
e po
tent
ial t
o ge
nera
te lo
w le
vels
of
grou
ndbo
rne
vibr
atio
n.
Vib
ratio
n le
vels
coul
d re
ach
as h
igh
as a
ppro
xim
atel
y 87
vib
ratio
n de
cibe
ls (V
dB) w
ithin
25
feet
of t
he P
roje
ct si
te fr
om th
e op
erat
ion
of la
rge
bulld
ozer
s. C
onstr
uctio
n of
the
Proj
ect w
ould
requ
ire th
e us
e of
typi
cal
cons
truct
ion
equi
pmen
t th
at c
ould
gen
erat
e so
me
grou
nd-b
orne
vib
ratio
n an
d gr
ound
-bor
ne n
oise
, but
the
Proj
ect w
ould
not
invo
lve
the
use
of p
ile d
river
s, w
hich
hav
e th
e po
tent
ial t
o ge
nera
te s
ubsta
ntia
l vib
ratio
n.
In a
dditi
on, p
er th
e To
wn’
s re
quire
men
ts, c
onstr
uctio
n ac
tiviti
es t
hat
wou
ld p
rodu
ce g
roun
dbor
ne
vibr
atio
n w
ould
prim
arily
occ
ur b
etw
een
the
hour
s of
7:0
0 A
M a
nd 8
:00
PM
Mon
day
thro
ugh
Frid
ay.
The
refo
re,
thes
e ac
tiviti
es w
ould
not
occ
ur d
urin
g re
cogn
ized
sle
ep h
ours
for
res
iden
ts.
Base
d on
thi
s in
form
atio
n, p
ropo
sed
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
the
Pro
ject
wou
ld n
ot e
xpos
e se
nsiti
ve
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-46
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
rece
ptor
s in
the
Pro
ject
vic
inity
to
exce
ssiv
e gr
ound
born
e vi
brat
ion
leve
ls.
Ther
efor
e,
Proj
ect
impa
cts
rela
ted
to
exce
ssiv
e co
nstru
ctio
n-re
late
d gr
ound
born
e vi
brat
ion
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
les
s th
an s
igni
fican
t an
d no
m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s wou
ld b
e re
quire
d.
Impa
ct N
OIS
E-3
Tem
pora
ry In
crea
se in
Noi
se (C
onstr
uctio
n N
oise
)
The
uses
nea
rest
the
Proj
ect s
ite th
at a
re s
ensit
ive
to c
onstr
uctio
n no
ise a
re th
e sin
gle-
fam
ily a
nd m
ulti-
fam
ily r
esid
entia
l us
es a
djac
ent
to t
he P
roje
ct s
ite’s
so
uthe
rn a
nd w
este
rn b
ound
arie
s. T
he p
rope
rty l
ine
of t
he n
eare
st of
f-site
, m
ulti-
fam
ily re
siden
tial u
ses i
s loc
ated
app
roxi
mat
ely
100
feet
from
the
edge
of
the
area
s of
con
struc
tion
with
in t
he P
roje
ct s
ite.
Thi
s EI
R as
sum
es t
hat
an
incr
ease
of f
ive
A-w
eigh
ted
deci
bel s
cale
(dBA
) or g
reat
er o
ver a
mbi
ent n
oise
le
vels
is su
bsta
ntia
l an
d sig
nific
ant.
The
refo
re,
dem
oliti
on a
nd c
onstr
uctio
n ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e Pr
ojec
t, pa
rticu
larly
the
use
of h
eavy
mac
hine
ry,
coul
d ge
nera
te t
empo
rary
int
erm
itten
t no
ise i
n ex
cess
of
the
Tow
n’s
noise
sta
ndar
ds.
How
ever
, co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es w
ould
onl
y oc
cur
durin
g th
e pe
rmitt
ed h
ours
des
igna
ted
in th
e To
wn’
s M
unic
ipal
Cod
e, a
nd th
us w
ould
not
oc
cur d
urin
g re
cogn
ized
sle
ep h
ours
for r
esid
ence
s or o
n da
ys th
at re
siden
ts ar
e m
ost s
ensit
ive
to e
xter
ior n
oise
. In
add
ition
, con
struc
tion
activ
ities
wou
ld a
lso
be r
equi
red
to c
ompl
y w
ith th
e co
nstru
ctio
n no
ise s
tand
ards
esta
blish
ed in
the
Tow
n N
oise
Ord
inan
ce.
As s
uch,
alth
ough
a p
hysic
al in
crea
se in
am
bien
t noi
se
leve
ls w
ould
occ
ur fr
om th
e co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e Pr
ojec
t, th
is te
mpo
rary
incr
ease
wou
ld n
ot c
reat
e an
adv
erse
effe
ct o
n ne
arby
resid
ents.
Th
eref
ore,
with
com
plia
nce
with
the
Tow
n’s
Mun
icip
al C
ode
and
Noi
se
Ord
inan
ce,
the
mag
nitu
de o
f th
is im
pact
wou
ld b
e re
duce
d to
a l
ess
than
sig
nific
ant l
evel
.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct N
OIS
E-4
Per
man
ent I
ncre
ases
in N
oise
(Ope
ratio
nal I
mpa
cts)
Traf
fic N
oise
Lev
els O
n sit
e N
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
Le
ss T
han
Sign
ifica
nt
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-47
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Upo
n co
mpl
etio
n of
the
Proj
ect,
noise
leve
ls w
ithin
the
Proj
ect s
ite w
ould
be
prim
arily
gen
erat
ed b
y ve
hicu
lar
traffi
c on
the
sur
roun
ding
roa
dway
s. T
he
Tow
n ha
s es
tabl
ished
ext
erio
r no
ise s
tand
ards
for
diff
eren
t la
nd u
ses.
As
indi
cate
d in
the
Tow
n N
oise
Ord
inan
ce, n
oise
leve
ls at
eac
h la
nd u
se m
ay n
ot
exce
ed t
he e
xter
ior
noise
sta
ndar
d pl
us 2
0 dB
A f
or a
ny p
erio
d of
tim
e (m
axim
um n
oise
lev
el).
Bas
ed o
n th
e co
ncep
tual
site
pla
n fo
r th
e Pr
ojec
t sh
owin
g th
e lo
catio
ns
of
the
prop
osed
re
siden
tial
uses
re
lativ
e to
th
e su
rroun
ding
road
way
s, no
ne o
f the
resid
entia
l use
s pr
opos
ed in
the
Proj
ect s
ite
wou
ld b
e lo
cate
d w
ithin
the
70
Ldn
(com
mun
ity n
oise
) co
ntou
rs o
f th
e ro
adw
ays
anal
yzed
. Th
us, t
he p
ropo
sed
resid
entia
l use
s w
ithin
the
Proj
ect s
ite
wou
ld n
ot b
e ex
pose
d to
traf
fic n
oise
leve
ls ex
ceed
ing
70 L
dn.
Thus
, im
pact
s as
soci
ated
with
tra
ffic
noise
lev
els
on-s
ite w
ould
be
cons
ider
ed l
ess
than
sig
nific
ant.
Off-
Site
Tra
ffic
Noi
se
The
incr
ease
in
traffi
c re
sulti
ng f
rom
im
plem
enta
tion
of t
he P
roje
ct w
ould
in
crea
se t
he a
mbi
ent
noise
lev
els
at s
ensit
ive
off-s
ite l
ocat
ions
in
the
Proj
ect
vici
nity
. B
ecau
se t
raffi
c is
cons
ider
ed t
o be
a l
ong-
term
noi
se s
ourc
e, a
su
bsta
ntia
l pe
rman
ent
incr
ease
in
ambi
ent
noise
lev
els
in t
he P
roje
ct v
icin
ity
coul
d po
tent
ially
occ
ur.
a di
ffere
nce
of th
ree
dBA
bet
wee
n 24
-hou
r noi
se le
vels
is a
bare
ly-p
erce
ptib
le in
crea
se to
mos
t peo
ple.
A fi
ve d
BA in
crea
se is
read
ily
notic
eabl
e, a
nd a
diff
eren
ce o
f te
n dB
A w
ould
be
perc
eive
d as
a d
oubl
ing
of
loud
ness
. Be
caus
e th
e in
crea
se in
loca
l noi
se le
vels
alon
g ro
adw
ay s
egm
ents
resu
lting
from
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Proj
ect w
ould
not
exc
eed
the
esta
blish
ed
thre
shol
ds o
f sig
nific
ance
, th
is w
ould
not
rep
rese
nt a
sub
stant
ial
perm
anen
t in
crea
se in
am
bien
t noi
se le
vels.
Th
eref
ore,
this
impa
ct w
ould
be
cons
ider
ed
less
than
sign
ifica
nt a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
On-
Site
Non
-Veh
icul
ar N
oise
Upo
n co
mpl
etio
n of
the
prop
osed
resid
entia
l dev
elop
men
ts as
soci
ated
with
the
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-48
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Proj
ect,
sour
ces
of n
oise
tha
t w
ould
be
gene
rate
d by
ope
ratio
n of
the
new
re
siden
tial b
uild
ings
wou
ld in
clud
e ne
w s
tatio
nary
sou
rces
suc
h as
ven
tilat
ion
and
air
cond
ition
ing
(HV
AC)
sys
tem
s. I
n ad
ditio
n, l
imite
d co
mm
erci
al
deve
lopm
ent
(75,
000
squa
re
feet
of
co
mm
erci
al
spac
e)
wou
ld
also
be
de
velo
ped.
As s
uch,
the
pote
ntia
l com
mer
cial
dev
elop
men
ts w
ould
also
incl
ude
statio
nary
sou
rces
of n
oise
suc
h as
HV
AC
syste
ms
as w
ell a
s no
ise a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith d
eliv
ery
vehi
cles
and
load
ing
dock
act
iviti
es.
Thus
, with
com
plia
nce
with
th
e pr
ovisi
ons o
f the
Tow
n N
oise
Ord
inan
ce, p
oten
tial n
oise
impa
cts
asso
ciat
ed
with
H
VA
C
syste
ms
and
com
mer
cial
lo
adin
g do
ck
activ
ities
w
ould
be
co
nsid
ered
less
than
sign
ifica
nt a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
Ice
Skat
ing
Pond
As d
iscus
sed
prev
ious
ly in
Sec
tion
III, P
roje
ct D
escr
iptio
n, th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld b
e bu
ilt i
n se
vera
l ph
ases
with
the
con
struc
tion
of a
Hot
el,
whi
ch i
nclu
des
an
outd
oor
ice
skat
ing
pond
, occ
urrin
g in
the
firs
t ph
ase.
Th
e op
erat
ion
of t
he
outd
oor i
ce sk
atin
g po
nd w
ould
requ
ire th
e us
e of
var
ious
type
s of e
quip
men
t in
orde
r to
freez
e th
e w
ater
con
tain
ed w
ithin
the
ice
skat
ing
pond
, to
rem
ove
snow
du
ring
the
win
ter m
onth
s an
d to
mai
ntai
n th
e su
rface
of t
he ic
e. T
hese
var
ious
ty
pes
of e
quip
men
t all
have
the
pote
ntia
l to
gene
rate
noi
se w
hich
may
exc
eed
the
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Noi
se a
nd L
and
Use
Com
patib
ility
Crit
eria
. Th
e re
sulti
ng n
oise
leve
l wou
ld b
e w
ithin
the
50 –
65
dBA
“no
rmal
ly a
ccep
tabl
e”
cate
gory
for m
ulti-
fam
ily re
siden
tial u
ses o
f the
Lan
d U
se C
ompa
tibili
ty
Impa
ct N
OIS
E-5
Exc
essiv
e O
pera
tiona
l Gro
undb
orne
Vib
ratio
n
Impa
cts
of g
roun
dbor
ne v
ibra
tion
asso
ciat
ed w
ith P
roje
ct c
onstr
uctio
n ar
e di
scus
sed
abov
e un
der I
mpa
ct N
oise
-2.
The
Proj
ect d
oes
not i
nvol
ve a
ny o
ther
so
urce
s of
gro
undb
orne
vib
ratio
n an
d gr
ound
born
e no
ise.
Ther
efor
e, P
roje
ct
impa
cts
asso
ciat
ed w
ith e
xces
sive
oper
atio
nal g
roun
dbor
ne v
ibra
tion
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
less
than
sign
ifica
nt a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-49
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Impa
ct N
OIS
E-6
Cum
ulat
ive
Impa
cts
Dev
elop
men
t of
the
Pro
ject
in
com
bina
tion
with
the
rel
ated
pro
ject
s w
ould
re
sult
in a
n in
crea
se i
n co
nstru
ctio
n-re
late
d an
d tra
ffic-
rela
ted
noise
in
the
Proj
ect a
rea.
Th
e ne
ares
t res
iden
tial r
elat
ed p
roje
cts
to p
ortio
n of
the
Proj
ect
site
whe
re c
onstr
uctio
n ac
tiviti
es w
ould
be
conc
entra
ted,
how
ever
, are
loca
ted
appr
oxim
atel
y 1,
500
feet
to
the
north
(“T
he S
herw
in”)
and
1,0
00 f
eet
to t
he
wes
t (“
Snow
cree
k V
I –
The
Lodg
es”
and
“Sno
wcr
eek
VII”
). D
ue t
o th
e di
stanc
e of
the
se r
ecep
tors
fro
m t
he a
reas
of
the
Proj
ect
site
whe
re m
ost
cons
truct
ion
wou
ld b
e co
ncen
trate
d, a
nd t
he f
act
that
noi
se a
ttenu
ates
at
appr
oxim
atel
y six
dB
(A)
per
doub
ling
of d
istan
ce,
it is
not
likel
y th
at
cons
truct
ion
noise
wou
ld b
e au
dibl
e at
thes
e lo
catio
ns, t
hus
grea
tly m
inim
izin
g or
elim
inat
ing
the
pote
ntia
l cum
ulat
ive
noise
effe
ct.
Add
ition
ally
, eac
h of
the
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld b
e su
bjec
t to
Sect
ion
15.0
8.02
0 of
the
Tow
n M
unic
ipal
Cod
e, w
hich
lim
its th
e ho
urs
of a
llow
able
con
struc
tion
activ
ities
. Ea
ch o
f the
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld a
lso b
e su
bjec
t to
Sect
ion
8.16
.090
of
the
Tow
n N
oise
Ord
inan
ce, w
hich
esta
blish
es n
oise
stan
dard
s for
mob
ile a
nd
statio
nary
con
struc
tion
equi
pmen
t. W
ith c
onfo
rman
ce w
ith S
ectio
ns 1
5.08
.020
of
the
Tow
n M
unic
ipal
Cod
e an
d 8.
16.0
90 o
f th
e To
wn
Noi
se O
rdin
ance
, the
cu
mul
ativ
e co
nstru
ctio
n no
ise im
pact
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
.
Cum
ulat
ive
deve
lopm
ent
in t
he T
own
wou
ld n
ot r
esul
t in
the
exp
osur
e of
pe
ople
to
or t
he g
ener
atio
n of
exc
essiv
e gr
ound
born
e vi
brat
ion,
due
to
the
loca
lized
nat
ure
of v
ibra
tion
impa
cts a
nd th
e fa
ct th
at a
ll co
nstru
ctio
n w
ould
not
oc
cur a
t the
sam
e tim
e an
d at
the
sam
e lo
catio
n. T
here
fore
, thi
s im
pact
wou
ld
be c
onsid
ered
less
than
sign
ifica
nt a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-50
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
POPU
LA
TIO
N A
ND
HO
USI
NG
(PO
P)
Impa
ct P
OP-
1 P
opul
atio
n G
rowt
h A
ssoc
iate
d wi
th E
mpl
oym
ent
Popu
latio
n G
row
th D
ue to
Tem
pora
ry Jo
bs
The
Proj
ect w
ould
res
ult i
n em
ploy
men
t opp
ortu
nitie
s du
ring
its c
onstr
uctio
n pe
riod.
Pr
ojec
t-rel
ated
con
struc
tion
wor
kers
wou
ld n
ot b
e lik
ely
to r
eloc
ate
thei
r pla
ce o
f res
iden
ce a
s a c
onse
quen
ce o
f wor
king
on
the
Proj
ect.
The
refo
re,
Proj
ect i
mpa
cts
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an s
igni
fican
t and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
are
requ
ired.
Popu
latio
n G
row
th D
ue to
Per
man
ent J
obs
In a
dditi
on to
the
new
res
iden
ts as
soci
ated
with
the
prop
osed
res
iden
tial u
ses,
the
Proj
ect
wou
ld c
reat
e an
esti
mat
ed 9
25 f
ullti
me
equi
vale
nt e
mpl
oyee
s (F
TEEs
). T
he S
tate
of
Calif
orni
a do
cum
ents
the
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
hs L
akes
’ un
empl
oym
ent r
ate
at 5
.3 p
erce
nt, t
otal
ing
300
peop
le in
May
200
7. T
here
fore
, so
me
of th
e em
ploy
men
t ass
ocia
ted
with
the
Proj
ect c
ould
be
fille
d by
per
sons
fro
m th
e ex
istin
g em
ploy
men
t bas
e in
the
Proj
ect a
rea
and/
or b
y fu
ture
resid
ents
at
the
Proj
ect s
ite.
How
ever
, for
a c
onse
rvat
ive
anal
ysis,
it is
ass
umed
that
all
925
empl
oyee
s w
ould
rel
ocat
e to
the
are
a, i
ntro
duci
ng 9
25 e
mpl
oyee
-rela
ted
resid
ents
to th
e To
wn
thro
ugh
indi
rect
pop
ulat
ion
grow
th d
ue to
per
man
ent j
obs.
Th
is is
cons
isten
t w
ith t
he g
row
th a
ntic
ipat
ed i
n th
e 20
07 G
ener
al P
lan.
Th
eref
ore,
im
pact
s as
soci
ated
with
pop
ulat
ion
grow
th d
ue t
o pe
rman
ent
jobs
w
ould
be
less
than
sign
ifica
nt.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct P
OP-
2 P
opul
atio
n G
rowt
h A
ssoc
iate
d wi
th N
ew In
fras
truct
ure
Infra
struc
ture
ass
ocia
ted
with
the
Proj
ect w
ould
serv
e th
e Pr
ojec
t site
and
wou
ld
not
faci
litat
e ad
ditio
nal
deve
lopm
ent
as a
res
ult
of i
ncre
ased
inf
rastr
uctu
re.
Ther
efor
e, im
pact
s ass
ocia
ted
with
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
Pro
ject
wou
ld b
e le
ss
than
sign
ifica
nt.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-51
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Impa
ct P
OP-
3 P
opul
atio
n G
rowt
h As
soci
ated
with
New
Hou
sing
The
Proj
ect w
ould
resu
lt in
con
struc
tion
of 1
,050
dw
ellin
g un
its.
The
Proj
ect i
s an
ticip
ated
to
co
ntrib
ute
ten
perc
ent
to
futu
re
build
out
deve
lopm
ent
(in
com
bina
tion
with
all
rem
aini
ng S
now
cree
k de
velo
pmen
ts).
Ther
efor
e, im
pact
s to
pop
ulat
ion
grow
th a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he P
roje
ct w
ould
be
less
than
sign
ifica
nt.
Add
ition
ally
, the
Pro
ject
will
com
ply
with
the
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g M
itiga
tion
Regu
latio
ns T
own
Mun
icip
al C
ode
17.3
6 an
d w
ill p
rovi
de h
ousin
g fo
r th
e es
timat
ed 9
25 F
ull
Tim
e Eq
uiva
lent
Em
ploy
ees
(FTE
Es)
asso
ciat
ed w
ith t
he
Proj
ect.
A h
ousin
g m
itiga
tion
deve
lopm
ent p
lan
will
be
subm
itted
alo
ng w
ith
the
Proj
ect g
ener
atin
g th
e ne
ed f
or th
e ho
usin
g (s
ee A
ppen
dix
N).
Cur
rent
ly,
that
pla
n in
clud
es a
com
bina
tion
of th
e fo
llow
ing
mea
sure
s: (1
) 80
on-s
ite u
nits,
(2
) hou
sing
cred
its, a
nd (3
) pay
men
t of i
n-lie
u fe
es.
Hou
sing
will
be
prov
ided
at
250
squa
re fe
et p
er F
TEE.
The
refo
re, i
mpa
cts
to w
orkf
orce
hou
sing
asso
ciat
ed
with
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
Pro
ject
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct P
OP-
4 C
umul
ativ
e Im
pact
s
Of t
he 4
1 re
late
d pr
ojec
ts lis
ted,
34
incl
ude
resid
entia
l dev
elop
men
ts w
ithin
the
Tow
n, to
talin
g ap
prox
imat
ely
3,67
4 re
siden
tial u
nits
that
wou
ld a
ccom
mod
ate
a po
pula
tion
of a
ppro
xim
atel
y 8,
900
pers
ons.
Whe
n co
mbi
ned
with
the
Proj
ect’s
1,
050
units
and
esti
mat
ed p
opul
atio
n of
2,5
62 p
erso
ns, c
umul
ativ
e re
siden
tial
deve
lopm
ent a
mou
nts
to a
ppro
xim
atel
y 4,
724
units
and
app
roxi
mat
ely
11,4
62
pers
ons.
By 2
024,
dev
elop
men
t of t
he P
roje
ct in
con
junc
tion
with
the
appl
icab
le re
late
d pr
ojec
ts w
ould
acc
ount
for a
ppro
xim
atel
y 28
per
cent
of t
he 1
6,71
0 an
ticip
ated
ho
usin
g un
its a
nd fo
r app
roxi
mat
ely
19 p
erce
nt o
f the
60,
700
antic
ipat
ed to
tal
popu
latio
n.
For t
he re
ason
s not
ed a
bove
, dev
elop
men
t of t
he P
roje
ct in
con
junc
tion
with
the
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-52
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
appl
icab
le r
elat
ed p
roje
cts
wou
ld a
ssist
the
Tow
n in
mee
ting
its f
air
shar
e of
re
gion
al h
ousin
g ne
ed,
cons
titut
ing
a be
nefic
ial
rath
er t
han
adve
rse
hous
ing
impa
ct.
Beca
use
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
Pro
ject
and
the
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld h
elp
addr
ess
a po
rtion
of u
nmet
hou
sing
dem
and
and
serv
e an
ticip
ated
pop
ulat
ion
grow
th in
th
e Pr
ojec
t are
a, e
ither
dire
ctly
(e.g
., by
pro
posin
g ne
w h
omes
and
bus
ines
ses)
, or
in
dire
ctly
(e
.g.,
thro
ugh
exte
nsio
n of
ro
ads
or
othe
r in
frastr
uctu
re),
cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts w
ould
be
less
than
sign
ifica
nt.
PUBL
IC S
ERV
ICES
(PS)
Impa
ct P
S-1
Pol
ice
Serv
ices
Whi
le th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld in
crea
se th
e nu
mbe
r of p
erso
ns a
nd le
vel o
f act
ivity
on
the
Proj
ect
site,
giv
en t
he t
ypes
of
uses
ass
ocia
ted
with
a r
esor
t re
crea
tion
cent
er,
it is
reas
onab
le t
o ex
pect
tha
t th
e Pr
ojec
t w
ould
not
res
ult
in a
m
eani
ngfu
l inc
reas
e in
the
amou
nt o
f crim
e in
the
Proj
ect a
rea.
Fur
ther
, giv
en
that
the
Proj
ect i
s not
exp
ecte
d to
gen
erat
e a
cons
ider
able
incr
ease
in c
rime,
the
affe
ct th
at th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld h
ave
on re
spon
se ti
mes
wou
ld b
e m
inim
al, i
f at a
ll.
Add
ition
ally
, ac
cord
ing
to t
he M
amm
oth
Lake
s Po
lice
Dep
artm
ent
(MLP
D),
alth
ough
ad
ditio
nal
polic
e eq
uipm
ent
and
staff
wou
ld
be
nece
ssar
y to
ac
com
mod
ate
the
Proj
ect,
the
addi
tiona
l dem
and
for p
olic
e se
rvic
es c
reat
ed b
y th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld n
ot re
quire
the
need
for n
ew o
r alte
red
polic
e fa
cilit
ies
othe
r th
an th
ose
curre
ntly
pla
nned
for f
utur
e po
lice
staffi
ng a
nd fa
cilit
ies.
The
refo
re,
Proj
ect
impa
cts
on p
olic
e se
rvic
es w
ould
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant
and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct P
S-2P
olic
e Se
rvic
es (C
umul
ativ
e)
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res P
S-2a
thro
ugh
2c
Incr
ease
s in
pop
ulat
ion
in t
he T
own
have
the
pot
entia
l to
inc
reas
e ca
lls f
or
polic
e pr
otec
tion
serv
ices
. Th
e im
pact
s cr
eate
d by
new
dev
elop
men
t wou
ld b
e M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
PS-
2a
Bars
and
resta
uran
ts th
at c
ater
to la
te n
ight
cro
wds
will
hav
e tra
ined
sec
urity
per
sonn
el in
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-53
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
redu
ced
by t
he i
ncor
pora
tion
of s
ecur
ity m
easu
res
(e.g
., se
curit
y pe
rson
nel
staffe
d at
any
new
bar
s and
resta
uran
ts th
at c
ater
to la
te n
ight
cro
wds
and
priv
ate
secu
rity
patro
lling
th
e Pr
ojec
t) as
w
ell
as
the
desig
natio
n of
Tr
ansie
nt
Occ
upan
cy T
ax (
TOT)
dol
lars
and
Dev
elop
er I
mpa
ct F
ees
for
polic
e se
rvic
es.
How
ever
, the
Pro
ject
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts w
ould
requ
ire th
at
the
new
pol
ice
faci
lity
be c
ompl
eted
in th
e ne
xt tw
o to
thre
e ye
ars o
r in
the
late
r ph
ases
of
the
Proj
ect
to m
eet
thes
e ne
eds.
As
a re
sult,
cum
ulat
ive
polic
e pr
otec
tion
impa
cts a
re c
onsid
ered
to b
e sig
nific
ant.
New
pol
ice
faci
litie
s wou
ld
be re
quire
d in
ord
er to
fully
miti
gate
this
signi
fican
t cum
ulat
ive
impa
ct to
a le
ss-
than
-sig
nific
ant l
evel
.
Beca
use
the
Proj
ect
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith a
ntic
ipat
ed c
umul
ativ
e de
velo
pmen
t w
ould
res
ult
in s
igni
fican
t im
pact
s re
late
d to
pol
ice
prot
ectio
n se
rvic
es,
the
follo
win
g m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
reco
mm
ende
d by
the
MLP
D:
orde
r to
redu
ce d
eman
d on
pol
ice
serv
ices
.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re P
S-2b
Prov
ide
fair
shar
e of
Dev
elop
er Im
pact
Fee
s to
ass
ist th
e M
LPD
in th
e co
nstru
ctio
n of
a
publ
ic sa
fety
and
disp
atch
faci
lity
and
hold
ing
faci
litie
s as n
eede
d.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re P
S-2c
Prov
ide
priv
ate
secu
rity
with
in t
he s
ite t
o pa
trol
the
non-
resid
entia
l co
mpl
ex i
n th
e ev
enin
gs, i
f nec
essa
ry, i
n or
der t
o re
duce
crim
inal
beh
avio
r, an
d w
ork
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith
law
enf
orce
men
t to
solv
e cr
imes
and
crim
e pr
oble
ms.
Impa
ct P
S-3
Fire
Ser
vice
s
The
exist
ing
maj
or p
ublic
roa
ds th
at s
erve
the
Proj
ect s
ite a
re O
ld M
amm
oth
Road
, Min
aret
Roa
d an
d Fa
irway
Driv
e.
New
inte
rnal
acc
ess
road
s w
ould
be
crea
ted
on t
he P
roje
ct s
ite.
Emer
genc
y ve
hicl
es w
ould
circ
ulat
e th
roug
h th
e Pr
ojec
t are
a us
ing
the
inte
rnal
road
way
syste
m.
Seco
ndar
y ac
cess
for f
ire sa
fety
w
ould
be
deve
lope
d in
con
junc
tion
with
the
road
way
sys
tem
to p
rovi
de lo
oped
se
cond
ary
emer
genc
y ve
hicl
e ac
cess
and
egr
ess.
Em
erge
ncy
acce
ss w
ould
be
prov
ided
by
crea
ting
a se
cond
ary
acce
ss p
oint
to
the
Proj
ect
off
of O
ld
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad.
Fire
lane
s, tu
rnin
g ra
dii a
nd b
ack
up s
pace
aro
und
build
ings
w
ould
be
desig
ned
in c
oope
ratio
n w
ith lo
cal o
ffici
als
so a
s to
be
adeq
uate
for
em
erge
ncy
and
fire
equi
pmen
t ve
hicl
es.
Pav
emen
ts w
ould
be
desig
ned
to
supp
ort
load
s cr
eate
d by
em
erge
ncy
vehi
cle
traffi
c.
Stan
dpip
e an
d fir
e su
ppre
ssio
n sy
stem
s co
nnec
tions
wou
ld b
e in
corp
orat
ed in
to a
rchi
tect
ural
and
la
ndsc
apin
g de
sign
elem
ents
whe
re p
ract
ical
and
in lo
catio
ns a
cces
sible
to fi
re
equi
pmen
t.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-54
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
The
Proj
ect w
ould
inco
rpor
ate
a nu
mbe
r of
fire
saf
ety
feat
ures
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith a
pplic
able
MLF
PD fi
re-s
afet
y co
de a
nd T
own
regu
latio
ns fo
r con
struc
tion,
ac
cess
, fir
e flo
ws,
and
fire
hydr
ants.
Co
nsid
erin
g th
at t
he P
roje
ct s
ite i
s un
deve
lope
d an
d th
at c
urre
nt u
se o
f the
site
is li
mite
d to
ope
n sp
ace,
the
Proj
ect
wou
ld re
pres
ent a
mor
e in
tens
e us
e of
the
site.
Alth
ough
the
rela
tions
hip
is no
t di
rect
ly p
ropo
rtion
al, m
ore
inte
nse
uses
of l
and
typi
cally
resu
lt in
the
incr
ease
d po
tent
ial f
or f
ire a
nd e
mer
genc
y in
cide
nts.
Thu
s, th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld c
reat
e an
in
crea
sed
dem
and
for
fire
prot
ectio
n se
rvic
es.
How
ever
, ac
cord
ing
to t
he
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Fire
Pro
tect
ion
Dist
rict
(MLF
PD),
with
the
mut
ual-a
id
agre
emen
t with
nei
ghbo
ring
fire
distr
icts,
thei
r cur
rent
sta
ffing
and
equ
ipm
ent,
faci
lity
leve
ls ar
e ad
equa
te t
o ac
com
mod
ate
the
Proj
ect’s
dem
and
for
fire
prot
ectio
n se
rvic
es.
In
addi
tion,
the
MLF
PD i
s a
parti
cipa
nt i
n th
e To
wn’
s Em
erge
ncy
Ope
ratio
ns P
lan
(Pla
n) w
hich
incl
udes
the
Proj
ect a
rea.
Th
e Pl
an
wou
ld b
e re
vise
d w
ith t
he d
evel
opm
ent
of t
he P
roje
ct t
o in
clud
e an
y ne
eded
up
date
s or
cha
nges
. It
wou
ld b
e an
ticip
ated
that
onl
y m
inor
cha
nges
wou
ld b
e ne
eded
to u
pdat
e th
e pl
an b
ased
upo
n th
e cu
rrent
pla
ns a
nd z
onin
g. T
here
fore
, Pr
ojec
t im
pact
s re
late
d to
fire
pro
tect
ion
serv
ices
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an s
igni
fican
t an
d no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Impa
ct P
S-4
Fire
Ser
vice
s (C
umul
ativ
e)
The
Proj
ect i
n co
njun
ctio
n w
ith th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts do
es c
umul
ativ
ely
incr
ease
th
e de
man
d fo
r fire
pro
tect
ion
serv
ices
in th
e M
LFPD
. Th
is is
prim
arily
a re
sult
of th
e nu
mbe
r and
type
of n
ew b
uild
ings
that
the
Proj
ect a
nd th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts br
ing
to th
e M
LFPD
. Th
e M
LFPD
is a
ntic
ipat
ing
the
hirin
g of
mor
e fu
lltim
e po
sitio
ns t
o in
crea
se t
heir
capa
bilit
y to
res
pond
to
addi
tiona
l ca
lls a
nd t
he
asso
ciat
ed
adm
inist
rativ
e w
ork
that
w
ill
com
e al
ong
with
in
crea
sed
deve
lopm
ent a
nd in
crea
sed
traffi
c vo
lum
es in
the
Tow
n.
The
incr
ease
in s
taff
and
equi
pmen
t is
bein
g pr
ovid
ed
for
by
incr
ease
s in
pr
oper
ty
tax
and
Dev
elop
men
t Im
pact
Fee
s (D
IFs)
. M
LFPD
reco
gniz
es th
at th
e ca
ll vo
lum
e an
d
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-55
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
inci
dent
com
plex
ity w
ill c
ontin
ue t
o in
crea
se a
s th
e po
pula
tion
and
unit
num
bers
in
crea
se.
A
s sta
ted
prev
ious
ly,
MLF
PD
is in
th
e pr
oces
s of
re
mod
elin
g an
d en
larg
ing
Fire
Sta
tion
One
in re
spon
se to
add
ition
al c
omm
unity
de
velo
pmen
t. T
he M
LFPD
is a
ntic
ipat
ing
the
hirin
g of
mor
e fu
lltim
e po
sitio
ns
to i
ncre
ase
thei
r ca
pabi
lity
to r
espo
nd t
o ad
ditio
nal
calls
and
the
ass
ocia
ted
adm
inist
rativ
e w
ork
that
will
com
e al
ong
with
incr
ease
d de
velo
pmen
t. M
LFPD
is
also
inv
olve
d in
the
dev
elop
men
t of
a s
trate
gic
plan
tha
t w
ill a
id t
he
depa
rtmen
t in
pla
nnin
g fo
r th
e fu
ture
. Th
eref
ore,
cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts
to f
ire
prot
ectio
n se
rvic
es w
ould
be
less
than
sig
nific
ant a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s ar
e re
quire
d.
Impa
ct P
S-5
Sch
ool S
ervi
ces
The
scho
ols
that
wou
ld s
erve
the
Proj
ect e
xper
ienc
e ste
ady
enro
llmen
t and
are
cu
rrent
ly a
t or
nea
r ca
paci
ty.
The
Pro
ject
has
the
pot
entia
l to
gen
erat
e ap
prox
imat
ely
475
Kin
derg
arte
n th
roug
h Tw
elfth
gra
de s
tude
nts.
Bas
ed o
n th
e de
velo
per f
ees
esta
blish
ed b
y ea
ch o
f the
sch
ool d
istric
ts, th
e Pr
ojec
t app
lican
t w
ould
be
requ
ired
to p
ay $
2.63
per
squ
are
foot
of r
esid
entia
l dev
elop
men
t and
$0
.42
per
squa
re f
eet
of c
omm
erci
al d
evel
opm
ent.
As
state
d pr
evio
usly
, pr
ovid
ed in
§65
996
of th
e Ca
lifor
nia
Gov
ernm
ent C
ode,
the
paym
ent o
f su
ch
fees
is
deem
ed t
o fu
lly m
itiga
te t
he i
mpa
cts
of n
ew d
evel
opm
ent
on s
choo
l se
rvic
es.
The
refo
re,
with
pay
men
t of
the
se r
equi
red
deve
lope
r fe
es,
Proj
ect
impa
cts
to s
choo
l se
rvic
es w
ould
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant
and
no m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct P
S-6
Sch
ool S
ervi
ces (
Cum
ulat
ive)
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Pro
ject
in
conj
unct
ion
with
the
rel
ated
pro
ject
s w
ould
fu
rther
incr
ease
the
dem
and
for s
choo
l ser
vice
s. H
owev
er, a
s w
ith th
e Pr
ojec
t, th
e ap
plic
ants
of th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts w
ould
be
requ
ired
to p
ay d
evel
oper
fees
to
the
MSU
D;
paym
ent
of t
hese
fee
s w
ould
ful
ly m
itiga
te a
ny i
mpa
ct t
hat
the
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-56
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld h
ave
on s
choo
l se
rvic
es.
As
state
d pr
evio
usly
, th
e Pr
ojec
t’s im
pact
s to
sch
ool s
ervi
ces
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an s
igni
fican
t. T
here
fore
, cu
mul
ativ
e im
pact
s to
sch
ool
serv
ices
wou
ld b
e le
ss t
han
signi
fican
t an
d no
m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
Impa
ct P
S-7
Par
ks a
nd R
ecre
atio
n Se
rvic
es
The
Proj
ect’s
pro
pose
d re
crea
tiona
l an
d pu
blic
am
eniti
es (
as l
isted
abo
ve)
in
conj
unct
ion
with
the
Tow
n’s
curre
nt f
acili
ties
and
the
colle
ctio
n of
Dev
elop
er
Impa
ct F
ees
(DIF
s) t
hat
supp
ort
the
Tow
n’s
park
and
rec
reat
ion
fund
(as
re
quire
d by
To
wn
Mun
icip
al
Code
15
.16.
081)
, w
ould
be
ad
equa
te
to
acco
mm
odat
e th
e Pr
ojec
t’s
dem
and
for
park
s an
d re
crea
tiona
l se
rvic
es.
A
ppen
dix
M o
f th
is D
raft
EIR
incl
udes
the
Tow
n’s
curre
nt D
evel
oper
Im
pact
Fe
e Sc
hedu
le d
ated
Jun
e 20
07.
As
deve
lopm
ent o
ccur
s w
ithin
the
Proj
ect a
rea,
D
evel
oper
Im
pact
Fee
s w
ill b
e pa
id t
o th
e To
wn
to o
ffset
the
rec
reat
iona
l fa
cilit
ies a
nd m
aint
enan
ce.
No
addi
tiona
l par
ks o
r rec
reat
iona
l fac
ilitie
s bey
ond
wha
t ar
e pr
opos
ed w
ould
be
requ
ired.
Th
eref
ore,
Pro
ject
im
pact
s to
par
k se
rvic
es w
ould
be
less
than
sign
ifica
nt a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct P
S-8
Par
ks a
nd R
ecre
atio
n Se
rvic
es (C
umul
ativ
e)
As
with
the
Proj
ect,
the
appl
ican
ts of
the
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld b
e re
quire
d to
pa
y D
evel
oper
Im
pact
Fee
s th
at s
uppo
rt th
e To
wn’
s pa
rk a
nd r
ecre
atio
n fu
nd;
paym
ent o
f the
se fe
es w
ould
fully
miti
gate
any
impa
ct th
at th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts w
ould
hav
e on
par
k an
d re
crea
tiona
l se
rvic
es.
As
state
d pr
evio
usly
, th
e Pr
ojec
t’s i
mpa
cts
to p
ark
serv
ices
wou
ld b
e le
ss t
han
signi
fican
t. T
here
fore
, cu
mul
ativ
e im
pact
s to
par
k se
rvic
es w
ould
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant
and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct P
S-9
Sno
w Re
mov
al S
ervi
ces
Road
way
mai
nten
ance
and
sno
w re
mov
al o
n pr
ivat
e ro
ads
and
priv
ate
prop
erty
N
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
Le
ss T
han
Sign
ifica
nt
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-57
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
is th
e re
spon
sibili
ty o
f th
e la
nd o
wne
rs.
The
refo
re,
Proj
ect
impa
cts
to t
he
Tow
n’s s
now
rem
oval
ser
vice
s wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Impa
ct P
S-10
Sno
w Re
mov
al S
ervi
ces (
Cum
ulat
ive)
The
Proj
ect
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith t
he r
elat
ed p
roje
cts
wou
ld n
ot c
umul
ativ
ely
incr
ease
the
dem
and
for
snow
rem
oval
ser
vice
s in
the
Tow
n.
The
rela
ted
proj
ects
in th
e To
wn
are
prim
arily
priv
ate
proj
ects
and
ther
efor
e, a
s w
ith th
e Pr
ojec
t, th
e pr
ivat
e la
nd o
wne
rs w
ould
be
resp
onsib
le f
or t
heir
own
snow
re
mov
al se
rvic
es.
This
wou
ld fu
lly m
itiga
te a
ny im
pact
that
the
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld h
ave
on s
now
rem
oval
ser
vice
s in
the
Tow
n.
As
state
d pr
evio
usly
, the
Pr
ojec
t’s im
pact
s to
sno
w re
mov
al s
ervi
ces
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an s
igni
fican
t. T
he
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld n
ot re
quire
the
need
for n
ew s
taff
or n
ew o
r al
tere
d pu
blic
wor
ks f
acili
ties.
The
refo
re,
cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts
to
snow
rem
oval
ser
vice
s w
ould
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant
and
no m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
REC
REA
TIO
N (R
EC)
Impa
ct R
EC-1
Follo
win
g th
e To
wn’
s req
uire
men
t of f
ive
acre
s of p
arkl
and
per 1
,000
resid
ents,
th
e pa
rkla
nd r
equi
rem
ent
for
the
Proj
ect
is ap
prox
imat
ely
12.8
1 ac
res.
The
Pr
ojec
t wou
ld e
xpan
d th
e ex
istin
g pr
ivat
ely
owne
d, b
ut p
ublic
ly a
cces
sible
gol
f co
urse
, int
o th
e 15
5-ac
re S
now
cree
k G
olf
Cour
se.
In a
dditi
on, a
s pr
evio
usly
sta
ted
the
Proj
ect w
ould
pro
vide
oth
er re
crea
tiona
l fac
ilitie
s inc
ludi
ng a
pub
licly
ac
cess
ible
gol
f clu
bhou
se, O
utfit
ters
’ Cab
in, I
nter
pret
ive
Cent
er, a
nd ic
e sk
atin
g rin
k/po
nd.
The
Proj
ect’s
pro
pose
d re
crea
tiona
l and
pub
lic a
men
ities
, as
liste
d ab
ove,
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith th
e To
wn’
s cu
rrent
fac
ilitie
s an
d th
e co
llect
ion
of
Dev
elop
er Im
pact
Fee
s (D
IFs)
that
supp
ort t
he T
own’
s par
k an
d re
crea
tion
fund
w
ould
be
adeq
uate
to
acco
mm
odat
e th
e Pr
ojec
t’s d
eman
d fo
r pa
rks
and
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-58
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
recr
eatio
nal
serv
ices
. T
here
fore
, w
ith p
aym
ent
of D
IFs
and
the
Proj
ect’s
pr
ovisi
on o
f new
pub
licly
ava
ilabl
e re
crea
tiona
l am
eniti
es, t
he P
roje
ct’s
impa
cts
on T
own
park
land
wou
ld b
e le
ss-th
an-s
igni
fican
t an
d no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
are
requ
ired.
The
Nat
iona
l Fo
rest
land
sur
roun
ding
the
Pro
ject
site
will
lik
ely
expe
rienc
e in
crea
sed
use
as a
res
ult o
f Pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion.
Th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
the
Out
fitte
rs’ C
abin
as
a fo
cal p
oint
for e
ntry
into
the
Inyo
Nat
iona
l For
est w
ould
al
levi
ate
exist
ing
incu
rsio
ns to
priv
ate
prop
erty
by
back
coun
try u
sers
and
wou
ld
serv
e to
red
uce
impa
cts
obse
rved
at
othe
r ac
cess
rou
tes
in c
urre
nt u
se.
The
Proj
ect w
ould
not
phy
sical
ly a
lter o
r pro
duce
any
dire
ct im
pact
on
land
with
in
the
Inyo
Nat
iona
l For
est.
The
refo
re, p
oten
tial i
mpa
cts
to th
e N
atio
nal F
ores
t la
nd a
djac
ent t
o th
e Pr
ojec
t site
wou
ld b
e le
ss-th
an-s
igni
fican
t and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Impa
ct R
EC-2
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Proj
ect w
ould
res
ult i
n th
e re
mov
al o
f pr
ivat
ely
owne
d pu
blic
ly a
cces
sible
driv
ing
rang
e fa
cilit
ies
loca
ted
in t
he e
aste
rn s
ectio
n of
pa
rcel
40-
070-
10 a
nd th
e no
rthea
st co
rner
of
parc
el 4
0-07
0-11
. A
dditi
onal
ly,
the
exist
ing
priv
atel
y ow
ned
publ
icly
acc
essib
le n
ine-
hole
Sno
wcr
eek
Gol
f Co
urse
wou
ld b
e te
mpo
raril
y cl
osed
for m
inor
cha
nges
. H
owev
er, d
evel
opm
ent
on th
e Pr
ojec
t site
wou
ld in
clud
e a
reso
rt co
mpo
nent
with
recr
eatio
nal e
lem
ents
and
addi
tiona
l, sta
nd-a
lone
recr
eatio
n co
mpo
nent
s. N
o po
licie
s co
ncer
ning
the
avai
labi
lity
of g
olf
driv
ing
rang
es h
ave
been
ado
pted
by
the
Tow
n.
Thus
, de
spite
the
rem
oval
of a
priv
atel
y ow
ned
publ
icly
acc
essib
le d
rivin
g ra
nge
and
the
tem
pora
ry l
oss
of u
se o
f th
e ex
istin
g ni
ne-h
ole
golf
cour
se f
or m
inor
ch
ange
s, th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld in
crea
se th
e ov
eral
l am
ount
of
publ
ic a
nd p
rivat
e re
crea
tion
oppo
rtuni
ties
in t
he M
amm
oth
Lake
s ar
ea.
The
refo
re,
Proj
ect
impa
cts a
ffect
ing
Tow
n re
crea
tion
faci
litie
s wou
ld b
e le
ss-th
an-s
igni
fican
t.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-59
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Impa
ct R
EC-3
The
Proj
ect c
onsis
ts of
bui
ld-o
ut o
f th
e re
mai
ning
app
roxi
mat
ely
237
acre
s of
th
e M
aste
r Pl
an a
rea
in o
rder
to
fulfi
ll th
e vi
sion
of t
he p
revi
ously
app
rove
d 19
74 a
nd 1
981
Mas
ter P
lans
. Th
e Pr
ojec
t is v
iew
ed a
s a re
sort
recr
eatio
n ce
nter
w
ith r
esid
entia
l us
es, o
utdo
or u
se a
reas
, and
mul
tiple
opt
ions
for
rec
reat
iona
l an
d pu
blic
am
eniti
es (a
s des
crib
ed in
Impa
ct R
EC-1
). H
owev
er, t
he P
roje
ct a
lso
relie
s on
exi
sting
rec
reat
iona
l el
emen
ts in
the
sur
roun
ding
are
a.
Thes
e re
crea
tiona
l ele
men
ts in
clud
e, b
ut a
re n
ot li
mite
d to
, the
Mam
mot
h M
ount
ain
Ski
Are
a, t
he S
herw
in R
ange
, K
erry
Mea
dow
Tra
il an
d th
e In
yo N
atio
nal
Fore
st.
Beca
use
muc
h of
the
Proj
ect r
elie
s on
and
will
cre
ate
som
e ad
ditio
nal
dem
and
upon
thes
e ex
istin
g re
crea
tiona
l ele
men
ts, th
e Pr
ojec
t will
hav
e so
me
impa
ct,
but
not
a sig
nific
ant
impa
ct,
on e
xisti
ng r
ecre
atio
nal
reso
urce
s, as
pr
evio
usly
disc
usse
d.
The
priv
atel
y ow
ned
Proj
ect s
ite h
as p
erio
dica
lly b
een
cros
sed
by p
edes
trian
s an
d hi
kers
for
pur
pose
s of
obt
aini
ng a
cces
s to
the
She
rwin
Ran
ge a
nd I
nyo
Nat
iona
l For
est.
The
dev
elop
men
t of t
he P
roje
ct w
ill re
quire
per
sons
who
may
ha
ve p
revi
ously
cro
ssed
the
Proj
ect s
ite to
now
hik
e ar
ound
the
perim
eter
of t
he
Proj
ect s
ite to
reac
h th
ese
area
s. T
he P
roje
ct a
pplic
ant h
as p
ropo
sed
to p
rovi
de
a po
rtal a
long
the
easte
rn e
dge
of th
e Pr
ojec
t site
. Th
at a
cces
s, w
hile
not
as
conv
enie
nt a
s th
e cu
rrent
acc
ess
poin
ts an
d ro
utes
, will
be
perm
itted
and
law
ful
and
will
be
enha
nced
with
a fa
cilit
y th
at w
ill p
rovi
de o
ppor
tuni
ties
for p
erso
ns
ente
ring
thos
e pu
blic
land
s to
ren
t ski
equ
ipm
ent a
nd o
ther
spo
rts e
quip
men
t.
With
thi
s po
rtal
and
the
asso
ciat
ed a
men
ities
, th
e im
pact
will
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct R
EC-4
Cum
ulat
ive
Impa
cts
The
rela
ted
proj
ects
in th
e To
wn
are
prim
arily
resid
entia
l pro
ject
s. R
esid
entia
l pr
ojec
ts ty
pica
lly h
ave
the
grea
test
impa
ct o
n pa
rks
and
recr
eatio
nal f
acili
ties,
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-60
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
beca
use
they
gen
erat
e th
e gr
eate
st us
ers
of p
arks
and
rec
reat
iona
l fa
cilit
ies
– fa
mili
es
with
ch
ildre
n.
Ther
efor
e,
deve
lopm
ent
in
Mam
mot
h La
kes
will
co
ntin
ue t
o in
crea
se d
eman
d at
all
leve
ls fo
r re
crea
tiona
l op
portu
nitie
s an
d fa
cilit
ies.
How
ever
, as
with
the
Proj
ect,
the
appl
ican
ts of
the
rel
ated
pro
ject
s w
ould
be
requ
ired
to p
ay D
IFs t
hat s
uppo
rt th
e To
wn’
s par
k an
d re
crea
tion
fund
; pay
men
t of
the
se f
ees
wou
ld f
ully
miti
gate
any
impa
ct t
hat
the
rela
ted
proj
ects
wou
ld
have
on
park
and
rec
reat
iona
l se
rvic
es.
As
state
d pr
evio
usly
, th
e Pr
ojec
t’s
impa
cts
to p
ark
serv
ices
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an s
igni
fican
t. T
here
fore
, cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts
to p
ark
serv
ices
wou
ld b
e le
ss t
han
signi
fican
t an
d no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
TRA
NSP
OR
TATI
ON
/TR
AFF
IC (T
RA
NS)
Impa
ct T
RAN
S-1
Exi
sting
Plu
s Pro
ject
Inte
rsec
tion
LOS
The
Proj
ect t
rips w
ere
distr
ibut
ed to
the
surro
undi
ng c
ircul
atio
n sy
stem
bas
ed o
n th
e lo
catio
n of
act
ivity
cen
ters
in th
e To
wn
and
the
loca
tion
of th
e Pr
ojec
t in
rela
tion
to t
he T
own'
s re
crea
tiona
l an
d co
mm
erci
al a
reas
. A
ppro
xim
atel
y 15
pe
rcen
t of P
roje
ct tr
affic
is d
estin
ed w
est t
o th
e Li
ttle
Eagl
e Sk
i Are
a an
d Ea
gle
Lodg
e vi
a M
erid
ian;
30
perc
ent n
orth
to T
he V
illag
e, C
anyo
n Lo
dge
and
Mai
n Lo
dge
via
Min
aret
Roa
d; 2
5 pe
rcen
t to
the
Dow
ntow
n ar
eas
via
Old
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad a
nd M
erid
ian
Boul
evar
d; 1
0 pe
rcen
t eas
t via
Mai
n St
reet
and
Mer
idia
n Bo
ulev
ard;
15
perc
ent
to M
ain
Stre
et a
ttrac
tions
via
Min
aret
Roa
d an
d O
ld
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad; a
nd 5
per
cent
eas
t via
Old
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad.
All
of th
e stu
dy
area
inte
rsec
tions
are
for
ecas
t to
oper
ate
at a
sat
isfac
tory
LO
S in
the
exist
ing
plus
Pro
ject
con
ditio
n. W
ith e
xisti
ng c
ondi
tions
, Pro
ject
-gen
erat
ed im
pact
s on
in
ters
ectio
n LO
S w
ould
be
less
than
sig
nific
ant a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s ar
e re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-61
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Impa
ct T
RAN
S-2
Cum
ulat
ive
Plus
Pro
ject
Inte
rsec
tion
LOS
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re T
RAN
S-2
Cum
ulat
ive
Plus
Pro
ject
Inte
rsec
tion
LOS
The
Min
aret
Ro
ad/M
ain
Stre
et
inte
rsec
tion,
on
e of
th
e fiv
e stu
dy
area
in
ters
ectio
ns, i
s fo
reca
st to
ope
rate
at a
n un
satis
fact
ory
LOS
in th
e cu
mul
ativ
e pl
us p
roje
ct c
ondi
tion.
Eval
uatio
n of
int
erse
ctio
n LO
S sh
ows
that
the
add
ition
of
the
Proj
ect
traffi
c to
the
cu
mul
ativ
e tra
ffic
will
sig
nific
antly
impa
ct th
e M
inar
et R
oad/
Mai
n St
reet
inte
rsec
tion
in
the
cum
ulat
ive
plus
Pro
ject
scen
ario
, acc
ordi
ng to
the
Tow
n's c
riter
ia.
The
follo
win
g im
prov
emen
t wou
ld b
e re
quire
d fo
r the
cum
ulat
ive
plus
Pro
ject
con
ditio
n to
miti
gate
the
inte
rsec
tion
to L
OS
D o
r bet
ter:
• M
inar
et R
oad/
Mai
n St
reet
. Pro
vide
eas
tbou
nd r
ight
-turn
ove
rlap
signa
l pha
sing
cons
isten
t with
Gen
eral
Pla
n re
com
men
datio
ns.
All
costs
for t
he im
plem
enta
tion
of t
his
impr
ovem
ent
shou
ld b
e el
igib
le f
or a
cre
dit
to D
evel
oper
Im
pact
Fee
s (D
IF).
Thi
s m
itiga
tion
wou
ld b
e im
plem
ente
d as
par
t of
a t
raffi
c m
itiga
tion
prog
ram
tha
t w
ould
be
fund
ed b
y th
e D
IF.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
thi
s m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
wou
ld re
duce
this
impa
ct to
a le
ss-th
an-s
igni
fican
t lev
el.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct T
RAN
S -3
Int
erna
l Circ
ulat
ion
and
Acce
ss
Acc
ess
to th
e Pr
ojec
t fac
ilitie
s an
d lo
dgin
g w
ould
be
from
an
inte
rnal
road
way
sy
stem
. T
he n
umbe
r of
int
erna
l in
ters
ectio
ns a
t th
e Pr
ojec
t sit
e w
ould
be
limite
d. N
ew in
tern
al a
cces
s roa
ds w
ould
be
crea
ted
thro
ugho
ut th
e Pr
ojec
t site
. A
ll in
tern
al c
ircul
atio
n w
ould
inte
rface
at v
ario
us p
oint
s w
ith li
nks
to e
xter
nal
trails
acc
essin
g pu
blic
land
s to
the
sout
h (S
herw
in R
ange
) or t
he e
aste
rn fo
rest
serv
ice
land
s. I
nter
nal
road
way
s w
ould
be
priv
atel
y ow
ned
and
mai
ntai
ned.
Th
e in
tern
al ro
adw
ay s
yste
m w
ould
pro
vide
acc
ess
to v
ario
us re
siden
tial a
reas
an
d co
mm
erci
al la
nd u
ses
thro
ugho
ut th
e Pr
ojec
t site
. Tr
ails
and/
or e
mer
genc
y ac
cess
roa
dway
s w
ould
allo
w s
econ
dary
poi
nts
of a
cces
s fro
m in
tern
al s
treet
s an
d ro
adw
ays.
All
side
inte
rsec
ting
stree
ts to
the
mai
n sp
ine
road
sho
uld
be
stop-
cont
rolle
d, a
nd a
n al
l-way
stop
wou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed a
t the
inte
rsec
tion
of th
e sp
ine
road
and
the
road
lead
ing
to S
now
cree
k V
. Si
ngle
-lane
roun
dabo
uts
may
al
so b
e su
bstit
uted
for
the
sto
p-co
ntro
lled
and
all-w
ay s
top
inte
rsec
tions
. Ro
adw
ay d
esig
ns w
ould
fit t
he la
nd a
nd b
e se
nsiti
ve to
topo
grap
hy, v
eget
atio
n
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-62
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
and
view
s. S
afe
cros
sings
for
ped
estri
ans
wou
ld b
e in
clud
ed a
nd c
ross
wal
ks
wou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed to
cro
ss O
ld M
amm
oth
Road
at t
he M
inar
et R
oad
roun
d-ab
out.
The
refo
re, i
mpa
cts
to in
tern
al c
ircul
atio
n an
d ac
cess
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an
signi
fican
t and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Impa
ct T
RAN
S-4
Par
king
The
Proj
ect w
ould
pro
vide
und
erstr
uctu
re p
arki
ng fa
cilit
ies
for t
he m
ajor
ity o
f th
e de
velo
pmen
t. S
urfa
ce p
arki
ng f
or c
heck
in, t
our
bus,
and
deliv
ery/
serv
ice
vehi
cles
wou
ld a
lso b
e pr
ovid
ed.
Par
king
stru
ctur
es w
ould
be
desig
ned
to
prov
ide
adeq
uate
wid
th a
nd h
eigh
t to
acc
omm
odat
e m
ost
priv
ate
vehi
cles
. Sh
ort-t
erm
su
rface
pa
rkin
g w
ould
be
pr
ovid
ed
adja
cent
to
th
e ch
eck-
in
loca
tions
, with
gue
sts d
irect
ed to
und
ergr
ound
par
king
stru
ctur
es lo
cate
d un
der
the
maj
or re
siden
tial b
uild
ings
. Sh
ort-t
erm
par
king
use
s inc
lude
pas
seng
er d
rop
off
and
load
ing,
ser
vice
, de
liver
ies,
trans
it ve
hicl
es,
and
gues
t pa
rkin
g fo
r re
siden
tial
uses
. S
ome
build
ings
may
sha
re c
heck
-in a
nd p
arki
ng a
cces
s.
Affo
rdab
le re
siden
tial u
nits
wou
ld b
e al
low
ed s
urfa
ce p
arki
ng fo
r bot
h re
siden
t an
d gu
est u
se.
Park
ing
for t
he g
olf c
ours
e w
ould
be
prov
ided
thro
ugh
the
Hot
el
park
ing.
Su
rface
par
king
wou
ld a
lso b
e pr
ovid
ed a
t the
Out
fitte
rs’
Cabi
n an
d th
e St
ore
and
Inte
rpre
tive
Cent
er.
Ther
e ar
e no
pla
ns to
pro
vide
any
per
man
ent
day
skie
r par
king
with
in th
e Pr
ojec
t site
.
The
proj
ect w
ill b
e re
quire
d to
pro
vide
ade
quat
e pa
rkin
g as
par
t of t
he a
ppro
val
proc
ess.
The
refo
re th
e pr
ojec
t wou
ld n
ot re
sult
in in
adeq
uate
par
king
cap
acity
an
d im
pact
s w
ould
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant
and
no m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s ar
e re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-63
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Impa
ct T
RAN
S-5
Bic
ycle
and
Ped
estri
an F
acili
ties
The
Tow
n Tr
ail
Syste
m M
aste
r Pl
an p
ropo
ses
the
exte
nsio
n of
fac
ilitie
s to
pr
omot
e su
ch n
on-m
otor
ized
alte
rnat
ive
form
s of
tra
nspo
rtatio
n as
wal
king
, bi
cycl
ing,
and
cro
ss-c
ount
ry s
kiin
g.
All
aspe
cts
of t
he P
roje
ct w
ould
be
conn
ecte
d w
ith a
serie
s of p
aths
and
wal
kway
s to
acco
mm
odat
e pe
destr
ians
and
bi
cycl
e us
e. L
inks
wou
ld o
ccur
at v
ario
us p
oint
s to
Old
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad a
nd it
s w
alki
ng a
nd b
icyc
le p
aths
. Th
e pe
destr
ian
and
bicy
cle
syste
m w
ould
incl
ude
inte
rior t
rails
and
sid
ewal
ks fr
ontin
g in
tern
al s
treet
s as
wel
l as
conn
ectin
g tra
ils
from
recr
eatio
nal a
men
ities
, out
door
spa
ces a
nd re
siden
tial a
reas
. W
alkw
ays t
o an
d fro
m r
esid
entia
l are
as, a
s w
ell a
s tra
il co
nnec
tions
that
wou
ld ti
e in
to th
e la
rger
Tow
n w
ide
recr
eatio
nal
trail
netw
ork
whi
ch i
nclu
des
pede
stria
n tra
ils,
bike
lan
es a
nd s
idew
alks
tha
t ar
e ad
jace
nt t
o m
ajor
roa
dway
s su
ch a
s O
ld
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad,
Min
aret
Roa
d, S
herw
in C
reek
Roa
d, a
nd F
airw
ay D
rive.
W
hen
poss
ible
, th
e m
ajor
int
erna
l pe
destr
ian
corri
dors
wou
ld b
e lo
cate
d ad
jace
nt to
land
scap
e fe
atur
es.
All
Proj
ect b
icyc
le a
nd p
edes
trian
fac
ilitie
s w
ould
ulti
mat
ely
conn
ect w
ith th
e To
wn’
s tra
il sy
stem
; the
reby
pro
vidi
ng th
e Pr
ojec
t with
a c
onne
ctio
n to
Tow
n-w
ide
faci
litie
s. T
here
fore
, im
pact
s w
ould
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant
and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct T
RAN
S-6
Tra
nsit
The
Proj
ect w
ould
incl
ude
conn
ectio
ns to
the
Mam
mot
h La
kes T
rans
it Re
d Li
ne
and
a sh
uttle
ser
vice
. T
he P
roje
ct w
ould
inc
lude
thr
ee s
peci
fic t
rans
it im
prov
emen
ts to
and
from
the
site.
The
se im
prov
emen
ts in
clud
e:
• A
revi
sion
to th
e Re
d Li
ne b
us ro
ute
that
incl
udes
a s
top
at th
e H
otel
en
tranc
e on
the
Proj
ect s
ite a
nd a
retu
rn to
the
orig
inal
bus
rout
e;
• Ex
clus
ive
shut
tle s
ervi
ce f
or h
otel
gue
sts t
o Ea
gle
Lodg
e an
d th
e V
illag
e/G
ondo
la a
rea;
and
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-64
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
• A
dditi
onal
(th
ree
to f
our)
shut
tle v
ans
prov
ided
by
the
Snow
cree
k V
III m
aste
r hom
eow
ners
ass
ocia
tion
for u
se b
y al
l res
iden
ts fo
r trip
s to
maj
or v
isito
r sto
ps in
clud
ing
Eagl
e Lo
dge,
the
Vill
age,
and
Mai
n St
reet
and
Old
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad c
omm
erci
al a
reas
.
Bus/s
huttl
e sh
elte
rs w
ould
be
prov
ided
at t
rans
it sto
ps.
Thes
e sh
elte
rs w
ould
be
sited
to fa
cilit
ate
the
safe
ty, u
se a
nd c
omfo
rt of
pas
seng
ers
usin
g tra
nsit
with
in
the
Proj
ect
area
and
wou
ld b
e ac
cess
ible
via
the
loc
al p
edes
trian
tra
il an
d w
alkw
ay n
etw
ork.
The
se im
prov
emen
ts w
ould
ben
efit
resid
ents
of th
e Pr
ojec
t ar
ea b
y pr
ovid
ing
on-s
ite s
ervi
ce a
nd c
onne
ctio
ns t
o th
e gr
eate
r M
amm
oth
Lake
s tra
nsit
syste
m, t
here
by p
oten
tially
incr
easin
g th
e us
e of
tran
sit w
ithin
the
Proj
ect a
rea
and
redu
cing
veh
icle
use
. H
owev
er, i
t is
not a
ntic
ipat
ed th
at a
ny
incr
ease
s in
tran
sit u
se w
ould
resu
lt in
dem
and
for t
he M
amm
oth
Lake
s Tr
ansit
Re
d Li
ne th
at c
anno
t be
acco
mm
odat
ed.
Ther
efor
e, im
pact
s to
trans
it w
ould
be
less
than
sign
ifica
nt a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
Impa
ct T
RAN
S-7
Haz
ards
New
inte
rnal
acc
ess r
oads
wou
ld b
e cr
eate
d th
roug
hout
the
Proj
ect s
ite.
Acc
ess
to th
e Pr
ojec
t fac
ilitie
s an
d lo
dgin
g w
ould
be
from
an
inte
rnal
road
way
sys
tem
an
d th
e nu
mbe
r of
int
erna
l in
ters
ectio
ns a
t th
e Pr
ojec
t sit
e w
ould
be
limite
d.
Trai
ls an
d/or
em
erge
ncy
acce
ss r
oadw
ays
wou
ld a
llow
sec
onda
ry p
oint
s of
ac
cess
fro
m in
tern
al s
treet
s an
d ro
adw
ays.
All
side
inte
rsec
ting
stree
ts to
the
mai
n sp
ine
road
wou
ld b
e sto
p-co
ntro
lled,
and
an
all-w
ay s
top
wou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed a
t the
inte
rsec
tion
of th
e sp
ine
road
and
the
road
lead
ing
to S
now
cree
k V
. Ro
adw
ay d
esig
ns w
ould
fit t
he la
nd a
nd a
llow
for v
iew
s of o
ncom
ing
traffi
c.
Safe
cro
ssin
gs f
or p
edes
trian
s w
ould
be
incl
uded
and
cro
ssw
alks
wou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed to
cro
ss O
ld M
amm
oth
Road
at t
he M
inar
et R
oad
roun
d-ab
out.
Fire
lane
s, tu
rnin
g ra
dii a
nd b
ack
up s
pace
aro
und
build
ings
wou
ld b
e de
signe
d in
coo
pera
tion
with
loca
l offi
cial
s so
as
to b
e ad
equa
te fo
r em
erge
ncy
and
fire
equi
pmen
t veh
icle
s. N
o ag
ricul
tura
l lan
d us
es a
re lo
cate
d in
pro
xim
ity to
the
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-65
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Proj
ect s
ite.
Ther
efor
e, th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld n
ot re
sult
in tr
affic
haz
ards
ass
ocia
ted
with
inc
ompa
tible
use
s, su
ch a
s fa
rm e
quip
men
t. T
he P
roje
ct w
ould
not
su
bsta
ntia
lly in
crea
se h
azar
ds d
ue to
a d
esig
n fe
atur
e or
inco
mpa
tible
use
s an
d im
pact
s wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Impa
ct T
RAN
S-8
Em
erge
ncy
Acce
ss
Emer
genc
y ve
hicl
es w
ould
circ
ulat
e th
roug
h th
e Pr
ojec
t are
a us
ing
the
inte
rnal
ro
adw
ay s
yste
m.
In a
dditi
on, s
uppl
emen
tal f
ire la
nes
wou
ld b
e de
velo
ped
in
conj
unct
ion
with
the
road
way
sys
tem
to p
rovi
de lo
oped
sec
onda
ry e
mer
genc
y ve
hicl
e ac
cess
and
egr
ess.
Fire
lane
s, tu
rnin
g ra
dii a
nd b
ack
up s
pace
aro
und
build
ings
wou
ld b
e de
signe
d in
coo
pera
tion
with
loc
al o
ffici
als
so a
s to
be
adeq
uate
for
em
erge
ncy
and
fire
equi
pmen
t ve
hicl
es.
Pav
emen
ts w
ould
be
desig
ned
to s
uppo
rt lo
ads
crea
ted
by e
mer
genc
y ve
hicl
e tra
ffic.
Sta
ndpi
pe a
nd
fire
supp
ress
ion
syste
ms
conn
ectio
ns w
ould
be
inco
rpor
ated
into
arc
hite
ctur
al
and
land
scap
ing
desig
n el
emen
ts w
here
pra
ctic
al a
nd in
loca
tion
acce
ssib
le to
fir
e eq
uipm
ent.
The
Proj
ect w
ould
incl
ude
a se
cond
ary
Proj
ect a
cces
s at t
he in
ters
ectio
n w
est o
f M
inar
et R
oad/
Old
Mam
mot
h Ro
ad, w
hich
wou
ld p
rovi
de a
dditi
onal
acc
ess
to
the
site
for
resid
ents
or e
mer
genc
y ve
hicl
es.
Ther
efor
e, th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld n
ot
resu
lt in
ina
dequ
ate
emer
genc
y ac
cess
and
im
pact
s w
ould
be
les
s th
an
signi
fican
t and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct T
RAN
S-9
Pol
icy
Cons
isten
cy
As
note
d, t
he P
roje
ct w
ill p
rovi
de f
or p
edes
trian
and
bic
ycle
fac
ilitie
s, an
d w
ould
pro
vide
for
bus
/shut
tle s
helte
rs s
ited
to f
acili
tate
the
saf
ety,
use
and
co
mfo
rt of
pas
seng
ers
usin
g tra
nsit
with
in t
he P
roje
ct a
rea.
Th
eref
ore
the
Proj
ect w
ould
not
con
flict
with
ado
pted
pol
icie
s, pl
ans,
or p
rogr
ams
supp
ortin
g al
tern
ativ
e tra
nspo
rtatio
n an
d im
pact
s w
ould
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant
and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-66
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Impa
ct T
RAN
S-10
Con
struc
tion
Dur
ing
cons
truct
ion,
m
ore
vehi
cle
trips
w
ould
be
ge
nera
ted
durin
g th
e gr
adin
g/ex
cava
tion
phas
e th
an d
urin
g ot
her
porti
ons
of P
roje
ct c
onstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
. O
ther
con
struc
tion
phas
es (
e.g.
, hau
ling
of e
quip
men
t and
mat
eria
ls)
wou
ld g
ener
ate
com
para
tivel
y fe
wer
trip
s; th
us, i
mpa
cts a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith g
radi
ng
phas
e tra
ffic
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
the
wor
st-ca
se s
ituat
ion
durin
g Pr
ojec
t co
nstru
ctio
n. G
radi
ng o
pera
tion
may
invo
lve
up to
10
haul
ers
cond
uctin
g 18
0 lo
ads
per
day
(180
trip
s in
and
180
trip
s ou
t). T
hese
trip
s w
ould
occ
ur o
n no
-sn
ow c
ondi
tions
wee
kday
s, M
onda
y th
roug
h Fr
iday
. Th
e gr
adin
g op
erat
ion
of
18 tr
ips i
n an
d 18
trip
s out
dur
ing
the
wee
kday
pea
k ho
ur w
ould
hav
e no
impa
ct
on th
e tra
ffic
impa
ct a
naly
sis’s
typi
cal w
inte
r Sa
turd
ay. T
his
volu
me
of tr
uck
trips
wou
ld b
e eq
uiva
lent
to
trips
gen
erat
ed b
y ap
prox
imat
ely
150
resid
entia
l un
its u
sing
a pa
ssen
ger-c
ar e
quiv
alen
t of
tw
o.
Ther
efor
e, t
he P
roje
ct’s
co
nstru
ctio
n im
pact
s w
ould
be
less
than
sig
nific
ant a
nd n
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s ar
e re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct T
RAN
S -1
1 C
umul
ativ
e Im
pact
s
The
long
-rang
e To
wn
Gen
eral
Pla
n bu
ild o
ut s
cena
rio f
rom
the
Eagl
e Lo
dge
Traf
fic I
mpa
ct A
naly
sis (
LSC
Con
sulta
nts,
Inc.
, Aug
ust
2006
) fo
r 20
24 p
lus
Proj
ect t
raffi
c pr
ojec
tions
and
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res f
rom
the
Tow
n G
ener
al P
lan
Upd
ate
DEI
R Tr
affic
Ana
lysis
(LS
C Co
nsul
tant
s, In
c., N
ovem
ber
2004
) w
ere
used
to e
valu
ate
long
-rang
e im
pact
s. T
he P
roje
ct w
ould
repr
esen
t a re
duct
ion
in
size
by a
ppro
xim
atel
y 20
0 un
its f
rom
that
ass
umed
in th
e To
wn
Gen
eral
Pla
n U
pdat
e D
EIR
Traf
fic A
naly
sis fo
r the
Pro
ject
site
. Th
eref
ore,
LO
S co
nditi
ons
will
be
impr
oved
fro
m t
hose
rep
orte
d in
the
Gen
eral
Pla
n an
alys
is an
d th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld n
ot c
ontri
bute
to a
sign
ifica
nt a
dver
se c
umul
ativ
e im
pact
.
All
study
inte
rsec
tions
wou
ld c
ontin
ue to
ope
rate
at s
atisf
acto
ry L
OS
(LO
S D
or
bette
r) un
der
long
-rang
e co
nditi
ons.
Thu
s, cu
mul
ativ
e im
pact
s w
ould
be
less
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-67
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
than
sig
nific
ant
and
no m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s ar
e re
quire
d fo
r th
e lo
ng-ra
nge
Tow
n bu
ild-o
ut c
ondi
tions
.
UTI
LITI
ES &
SER
VIC
E SY
STEM
S (U
TIL)
Impa
ct U
TIL-
1 W
aste
wate
r Gen
erat
ion
Was
tew
ater
fro
m
the
Proj
ect
site
wou
ld
be
conv
eyed
vi
a w
aste
wat
er
infra
struc
ture
to
the
Was
tew
ater
Tre
atm
ent
Plan
t (W
WTP
). C
urre
ntly
, th
e W
WTP
trea
ts an
ave
rage
dai
ly fl
ow o
f 1.6
mill
ion
gallo
ns p
er d
ay (m
gd),
a pe
ak
daily
flow
of 2
.6 m
gd, a
nd h
as c
apac
ity to
trea
t 4.9
mgd
. Th
is tra
nsla
tes
into
a
rem
aini
ng c
apac
ity o
f 2.
3 m
gd o
f w
aste
wat
er a
t av
erag
e da
ily f
low
s an
d 3.
2 m
gd o
f w
aste
wat
er a
t pea
k da
ily f
low
s th
at c
an b
e tre
ated
at t
he W
WTP
. The
Pr
ojec
t wou
ld re
pres
ent a
ppro
xim
atel
y 4
perc
ent o
f the
pea
k da
ily fl
ow c
apac
ity
of th
e W
WTP
trea
tmen
t for
pea
k da
ily f
low
s up
to 4
.9 m
gd.
Thu
s, Pr
ojec
t im
pact
s re
late
d to
was
tew
ater
trea
tmen
t cap
acity
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an s
igni
fican
t an
d no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct U
TIL-
2 W
aste
wate
r Inf
rastr
uctu
re
The
appl
ican
t wou
ld b
e re
spon
sible
for a
ll co
sts a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e in
stalla
tion
of w
aste
wat
er in
frastr
uctu
re o
n th
e Pr
ojec
t site
and
the
conn
ectio
n fe
es p
aid
to
Mam
mot
h Co
mm
unity
Wat
er D
istric
t (M
CW
D)
for
the
Proj
ect w
ould
hel
p to
pa
y fo
r th
e ne
cess
ary
upgr
ades
to
the
MC
WD
’s s
ewer
col
lect
ion
pipe
lines
de
scrib
ed a
bove
. I
n co
nsid
erat
ion
of t
he a
bove
, Pr
ojec
t im
pact
s re
late
d to
w
aste
wat
er i
nfra
struc
ture
wou
ld b
e le
ss t
han
signi
fican
t an
d no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct U
TIL-
3 W
aste
wate
r Gen
erat
ion
(Cum
ulat
ive)
The
pote
ntia
l nee
d fo
r the
rela
ted
proj
ects
to re
quire
upg
rade
s to
the
WW
TP to
ac
com
mod
ate
was
tew
ater
gen
erat
ed b
y th
ese
proj
ects
is sit
e-sp
ecifi
c, a
nd th
ere
is lit
tle, i
f any
, cum
ulat
ive
rela
tions
hip
betw
een
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
Pro
ject
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-68
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
and
the
rela
ted
proj
ects.
In
add
ition
, man
y of
the
rel
ated
pro
ject
s co
nsist
of
rede
velo
pmen
t th
at w
ould
res
ult
in t
he e
limin
atio
n of
exi
sting
was
tew
ater
ge
nera
tion
patte
rns
at th
ese
sites
. Th
e M
CW
D h
as a
rem
aini
ng c
apac
ity o
f 2.3
m
gd o
f w
aste
wat
er a
t ave
rage
dai
ly f
low
s an
d 3.
2 m
gd o
f w
aste
wat
er a
t pea
k da
ily f
low
s th
at c
an b
e tre
ated
at t
he W
WTP
; thu
s cu
mul
ativ
e im
pact
s to
the
rem
aini
ng c
apac
ity o
f th
e W
WTP
wou
ld b
e le
ss t
han
signi
fican
t an
d no
m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
Impa
ct U
TIL-
4 W
aste
wate
r Inf
rastr
uctu
re (C
umul
ativ
e)
MCW
D h
as i
dent
ified
def
icie
ncie
s in
the
col
lect
ion
syste
m t
hat
wou
ld b
e ex
acer
bate
d by
the
Proj
ect a
nd th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts. T
he p
oten
tial n
eed
for t
he
rela
ted
proj
ects
to
requ
ire
upgr
aded
w
aste
wat
er
lines
to
ac
com
mod
ate
was
tew
ater
gen
erat
ed b
y th
ese
proj
ects
is sit
e-sp
ecifi
c, a
nd th
ere
is lit
tle, i
f any
, cu
mul
ativ
e re
latio
nshi
p be
twee
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he P
roje
ct a
nd th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts.
In a
dditi
on, t
he c
onne
ctio
n fe
es p
aid
by in
divi
dual
app
lican
ts w
ould
he
lp t
o pa
y fo
r th
e ne
cess
ary
upgr
ades
to
the
sew
er c
olle
ctio
n pi
pelin
es
desc
ribed
abo
ve.
In c
onsid
erat
ion
of th
e ab
ove,
cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts
rela
ted
to
was
tew
ater
inf
rastr
uctu
re w
ould
be
less
tha
n sig
nific
ant
and
no m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Impa
ct U
TIL-
5 W
ater
Sup
ply
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res U
TIL-
5a th
roug
h 5f
The
Proj
ect’s
esti
mat
ed a
vera
ge w
ater
dem
and
is ap
prox
imat
ely
204,
152
gallo
ns p
er d
ay (g
pd) (
229
acre
feet
per
yea
r [af
y]) a
nd th
e pe
ak w
ater
dem
and
is 31
6,13
3 gp
d (3
54 a
fy).
Acc
ordi
ng to
the
exist
ing
wat
er s
uppl
y av
aila
ble
to
the
MC
WD
ther
e is
suffi
cien
t wat
er s
uppl
y at
ave
rage
and
pea
k tim
es in
bot
h no
rmal
and
mul
tiple
dry
yea
rs f
or th
e Pr
ojec
t. T
hus,
Proj
ect i
mpa
cts
to w
ater
us
e w
ithin
the
Tow
n w
ould
be
cons
ider
ed le
ss th
an si
gnifi
cant
and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
are
requ
ired.
H
owev
er,
the
follo
win
g m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s ar
e re
com
men
ded.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re U
TIL
-5a
Wat
er S
uppl
y
The
appl
ican
t sho
uld
ensu
re th
at th
e la
ndsc
ape
irrig
atio
n sy
stem
be
desig
ned,
insta
lled
and
teste
d to
pro
vide
uni
form
irrig
atio
n co
vera
ge.
Sprin
kler
hea
d pa
ttern
s sha
ll be
adj
uste
d to
m
inim
ize
over
spra
y on
to w
alkw
ays a
nd st
reet
s.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re U
TIL
-5b
Wat
er S
uppl
y
The
appl
ican
t sho
uld
insta
ll ei
ther
a “
smar
t spr
inkl
er”
syste
m to
pro
vide
irrig
atio
n fo
r the
la
ndsc
aped
are
as o
r, at
a m
inim
um, s
et a
utom
atic
irrig
atio
n tim
ers
to w
ater
land
scap
ing
durin
g ea
rly m
orni
ng o
r la
te e
veni
ng h
ours
to
redu
ce w
ater
los
ses
from
eva
pora
tion.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-69
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
Irrig
atio
n ru
n tim
es f
or a
ll zo
nes
shal
l be
adju
sted
seas
onal
ly, r
educ
ing
wat
er ti
mes
and
fre
quen
cy in
the
cool
er m
onth
s (fa
ll, w
inte
r, sp
ring)
. Sp
rinkl
er ti
mer
run
tim
es s
hall
be
adju
sted
to a
void
wat
er ru
noff,
esp
ecia
lly w
hen
irrig
atin
g slo
ped
prop
erty
.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re U
TIL
-5c
Wat
er S
uppl
y
The
appl
ican
t sho
uld
sele
ct a
nd u
se d
roug
ht-to
lera
nt, l
ow-w
ater
con
sum
ing
plan
t var
ietie
s to
redu
ce ir
rigat
ion
wat
er c
onsu
mpt
ion.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re U
TIL
-5d
Wat
er S
uppl
y
The
appl
ican
t sho
uld
insta
ll lo
w fl
ush
wat
er to
ilets
and
urin
als
and
shal
l lim
it th
e nu
mbe
r of
sho
wer
head
s to
one
hig
h ef
ficie
ncy
fixtu
re p
er s
tall,
in n
ew c
onstr
uctio
n.
Low
-flow
fa
ucet
aer
ator
s sho
uld
be in
stalle
d on
all
sink
fauc
ets.
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
re U
TIL
-5e
Wat
er S
uppl
y
The
appl
ican
t sha
ll be
sub
ject
to th
e pr
ovisi
ons
of a
recy
cled
wat
er o
rdin
ance
ado
pted
by
the
Tow
n pu
rsua
nt t
o A
rticl
e 10
.9,
begi
nnin
g w
ith S
ectio
n 65
601
of t
he G
over
nmen
t Co
de, a
nd ti
tled
Wat
er R
ecyc
ling
in L
ands
capi
ng A
ct (A
ct) a
t suc
h tim
e as
the
Tow
n is
no
tifie
d by
the
Mam
mot
h Co
mm
unity
Wat
er D
istric
t of t
he fu
ture
ava
ilabi
lity
of re
cycl
ed
wat
er,
at c
osts
reas
onab
ly c
ompe
titiv
e w
ith t
he c
osts
of u
ntre
ated
gro
undw
ater
. I
n ad
ditio
n, t
he S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pl
an s
hall
incl
ude
a pr
ovisi
on t
hat,
for
all
proj
ects
cons
truct
ed o
r app
rove
d pr
ior t
o th
e no
tice,
the
appl
ican
t sha
ll us
e th
eir b
est e
fforts
to u
se
recy
cled
wat
er c
onsis
tent
with
the
Tow
n, th
e A
ct, a
nd w
ater
dist
rict p
olic
y.
Impa
ct U
TIL-
6 W
ater
Infr
astru
ctur
e:
The
Proj
ect i
nclu
des i
nsta
llatio
n of
wat
er in
frastr
uctu
re w
ithin
the
Proj
ect s
ite to
co
nvey
wat
er f
rom
the
exist
ing
MC
WD
wat
er li
nes
to u
sage
poi
nts
with
in th
e Pr
ojec
t.
How
ever
, de
sign
plan
s fo
r th
is in
tern
al
Proj
ect
wat
er
supp
ly
distr
ibut
ion
syste
m a
re n
ot c
ompl
ete
at th
is tim
e. A
ccor
ding
to M
CWD
, are
as
of p
oten
tial d
efic
ienc
y ha
ve b
een
iden
tifie
d in
wat
er li
nes
in th
e Pr
ojec
t ar
ea
depe
ndin
g on
whe
re th
e Pr
ojec
t wou
ld c
onne
ct w
ith e
xisti
ng w
ater
line
s. T
he
appl
ican
t wou
ld b
e re
spon
sible
for
all
costs
ass
ocia
ted
with
the
insta
llatio
n of
No
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Less
Tha
n Si
gnifi
cant
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-70
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
wat
er in
frastr
uctu
re o
n th
e Pr
ojec
t site
and
the
conn
ectio
n fe
es p
aid
to M
CW
D
for
the
Proj
ect w
ould
hel
p to
pay
for
the
nece
ssar
y up
grad
es to
the
MCW
D’s
w
ater
pip
elin
es d
escr
ibed
abo
ve.
In c
onsid
erat
ion
of th
e ab
ove,
Pro
ject
impa
cts
rela
ted
to w
aste
wat
er i
nfra
struc
ture
wou
ld b
e le
ss t
han
signi
fican
t an
d no
m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
Impa
ct U
TIL-
7 C
umul
ativ
e W
ater
Sup
ply
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
UTI
L-7
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Proj
ect i
n co
mbi
natio
n w
ith th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts w
ould
fu
rther
inc
reas
e de
man
ds o
n w
ater
sup
ply
and
conv
eyan
ce i
nfra
struc
ture
. A
ccor
ding
to th
e To
wn,
all
of th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts ar
e ge
nera
lly c
onsis
tent
with
th
eir r
espe
ctiv
e la
nd u
se d
esig
natio
ns.
Ther
e w
ould
be
insu
ffici
ent s
uppl
ies
of
wat
er d
urin
g dr
y ye
ars
at T
own
build
out
with
out
the
Proj
ect.
Con
sequ
ently
, th
ere
wou
ld a
lso b
e in
suffi
cien
t wat
er f
or th
e Pr
ojec
t plu
s th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts
durin
g dr
y w
ater
yea
rs.
MC
WD
is w
orki
ng to
dev
elop
new
gro
undw
ater
sou
rces
, use
rec
ycle
d w
ater
, an
d im
plem
ent w
ater
restr
ictio
ns a
s a
mea
ns to
incr
ease
sup
plie
s to
reso
lve
any
pote
ntia
l wat
er su
pply
def
icie
ncie
s dur
ing
drou
ght p
erio
ds.
How
ever
, eve
n w
ith
full
impl
emen
tatio
n of
thes
e va
rious
wat
er s
uppl
y pr
ojec
ts, it
is e
xpec
ted
that
in
suffi
cien
t wat
er w
ould
be
avai
labl
e to
mee
t pro
ject
ed d
eman
d du
ring
a sin
gle
dry
year
. Th
eref
ore,
bec
ause
thes
e fu
ture
wat
er s
ourc
es d
o no
t exi
st at
pre
sent
th
e Pr
ojec
t’s c
ontri
butio
n to
ove
rall
wat
er s
uppl
y de
man
d w
ithin
the
Tow
n w
ould
be
cum
ulat
ivel
y co
nsid
erab
le,
and
cum
ulat
ive
wat
er s
uppl
y im
pact
s w
ould
be
signi
fican
t. I
mpl
emen
tatio
n of
the
fol
low
ing
miti
gatio
n m
easu
re
wou
ld h
elp
to re
duce
the
signi
fican
t cum
ulat
ive
wat
er s
uppl
y im
pact
s, ho
wev
er
cum
ulat
ive
wat
er su
pply
impa
cts w
ould
rem
ain
signi
fican
t.
The
Tow
n sh
all n
ot a
ppro
ve n
ew d
evel
opm
ent a
pplic
atio
ns th
at w
ould
res
ult i
n a
wat
er
dem
and
in e
xces
s of a
vaila
ble
supp
lies a
s det
erm
ined
by
the
Mam
mot
h Co
mm
unity
Wat
er
Dist
rict.
The
Tow
n sh
all w
ork
with
Mam
mot
h Co
mm
unity
Wat
er D
istric
t to
ensu
re th
at
deve
lopm
ent
proj
ects
incl
ude
phas
ed d
eman
d in
crea
ses
so t
hat
the
deve
lopm
ent
of
nece
ssar
y ad
ditio
nal w
ater
sup
ply
sour
ces
is es
tabl
ished
prio
r to
resp
ectiv
e de
velo
pmen
t de
man
d oc
curri
ng.
Sign
ifica
nt a
nd U
navo
idab
le
Impa
ct U
TIL-
8 C
umul
ativ
e W
ater
Infr
astru
ctur
e
Mam
mot
h Co
mm
unity
Wat
er D
istric
t (M
CWD
) ha
s id
entif
ied
defic
ienc
ies
in
the
wat
er li
nes
that
ser
ve th
e Pr
ojec
t are
a th
at, d
epen
ding
on
whe
re th
e Pr
ojec
t N
o m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s are
requ
ired.
Le
ss T
han
Sign
ifica
nt
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-71
SC
H #
200
6112
015
Tab
le I-
1
Sum
mar
y of
Env
iron
men
tal I
mpa
cts &
Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res
Envi
ronm
enta
l Im
pact
M
itiga
tion
Mea
sure
s Le
vel o
f Sig
nific
ance
af
ter
Miti
gatio
n
conn
ects
with
exi
sting
wat
er li
nes,
coul
d be
exa
cerb
ated
by
the
Proj
ect a
nd th
e re
late
d pr
ojec
ts. T
he p
ipel
ine
repl
acem
ent w
ork
is cu
rrent
ly sc
hedu
led
to o
ccur
be
twee
n 20
10 a
nd 2
013,
and
MCW
D h
as s
tate
d th
at th
e w
ork
mus
t be
don
e pr
ior
to f
ull
occu
patio
n of
the
Pro
ject
are
a.
MC
WD
has
dev
elop
ed f
utur
e de
man
d pr
ojec
tions
for t
he G
ener
al P
lan
Upd
ate
Dra
ft EI
R th
at re
sulte
d in
pla
ns
for
som
e in
frastr
uctu
re i
mpr
ovem
ents.
Th
e po
tent
ial
need
for
the
rel
ated
pr
ojec
ts to
req
uire
upg
rade
d w
ater
line
s to
acc
omm
odat
e th
eir
wat
er d
eman
ds
requ
ires
site-
spec
ific
eval
uatio
n an
d th
ere
is lit
tle,
if an
y,
cum
ulat
ive
rela
tions
hip
betw
een
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
Pro
ject
and
the
rela
ted
proj
ects.
In
addi
tion,
the
conn
ectio
n fe
es p
aid
by in
divi
dual
app
lican
ts w
ould
hel
p to
pay
for
the
nece
ssar
y up
grad
es to
the
wat
er li
nes
desc
ribed
abo
ve.
In c
onsid
erat
ion
of
the
abov
e, c
umul
ativ
e im
pact
s rel
ated
to w
ater
infra
struc
ture
wou
ld b
e le
ss th
an
signi
fican
t and
no
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res a
re re
quire
d.
Tow
n of
Mam
mot
h La
kes
Au
gust
200
7
Snow
cree
k VI
II, S
now
cree
k M
aste
r Pla
n U
pdat
e - 2
007
I. In
trod
uctio
n/Su
mm
ary
Dra
ft En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t
Page
I-72
SC
H #
200
6112
015
This
pag
e in
tent
iona
lly le
ft bl
ank.