soc370 paper
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Soc370 Paper
1/5
Andrew Lin
10/4/11
SOC370
Kim Lopez
Altruism and Conformity: My Personal Theories
Two prominent characteristics I often notice and take interest in that people display are that of
altruism and conformity. In the area I come from, which is a predominantly white, wealthy suburban
town, I notice varying levels altruism and conformity coming from people (including myself). This
variety largely depends who someone is or has become as a person, and what situation they are in.
Empathy, which I believe is necessary for altruistic behavior, is not a quality that can be taught.
It either can be reinforced or occluded, but I believe that every person, save for sociopaths, is born with
the ability to empathize. I believe this because I have noticed that most people are capable of altruism
if they invite guests over, they tend to them and provide free food and treat them with kindness. If
their friend is having a breakdown, they do their best to comfort them.
Yet the empathy that the people in my town have seems limited only to those in their immediate
presence. When it came to altruistic behavior that effected people outside of my town, it seemed like
most people were unwilling or incapable of it. There is a sort of double standard of altruism that puts
certain people, namely those that one knew personally and interacted with on a daily basis, above
others. In order to understand what encourages people to continue being altruistic, I will examine
factors that I believe to discourage altruism.
My upbringing, including the culture and class that I (and nearly everyone from my hometown)
was born into, greatly influences how I understand altruistic behavior. My personal culture has a heavy
emphasis on family and community. My family would often have meals that followed the Chinese
tradition, in which everybody sat around large dishes and shared food, rather than the American
tradition of each individual having their own plate with the food already on it. Through my
-
8/3/2019 Soc370 Paper
2/5
observations of the culture that permeates my hometown, which is largely influenced by the high social
status and economic class of the people whom live there, I have come to understand altruism as an
innate human quality that can grow or be repressed.
The suburban landscape of my hometown, which consists of large houses surrounded by large
yards and few public gathering areas, as well as the materialistic consumption and menial idol-worship
that takes place via strip malls and televisions, discourage deep thought and human interaction. This
kind of pursuit of material rewards and emphasis on privacy and a distrust of others is prominent in
higher class areas. Because of how the community (or lack thereof) is set up, both physically and
socially, nobody talks to strangers or shares experiences. Rather, they lock their doors and see anyone
else as a potentially dangerous person with the worst intentions. I have seen families gone for weeks
on vacation who leave lights on in and around their houses to try and create the illusion that people are
home, and burglars will be caught. Ironically, the people who do this live in one of the safest, most
secure neighborhoods in the world. Rather than gathering in public places to share a meal, a
conversation, or wonder with others at the beauty of the natural world, people stay inside in controlled
environments, where they watch shows about melodramatic people to get their fill of human
interaction. Advertisements sell cars and smart phones and touch pads as though they will bring about
fulfillment, love, and togetherness. But instead, these things sit on shelves and bring about wasted time
and isolation. When people in my town are not playing on their touch pads in their over-sized houses,
they are likely going to work in some cubicle or office in the middle of a gray city. This over-work and
over-consumption leads to stagnated thought and dehumanization, meaning people become less capable
of emphasizing with others.
Yet it is this isolation and materialism that people strive for in my hometown. I believe that the
educational and familial institutions' emphasis on systems of punishment and rewards (such as time
out, grades, etc.) informs people's thoughts ideas about work and motivation. Rather than acting
altruistically, or helping others for the sake of helping them, people begin to require rewards for their
-
8/3/2019 Soc370 Paper
3/5
actions. Thus, there are people in my hometown who own a mansion that sits upon thirty acres of land,
who will use what little altruism they have left to lavish guests with luxurious food and furnishing, but
will not spare any of that land to give the homeless a place to live. People will go through school and
college, but primarily to receive a high salary. They have, in my opinion, become less capable of
giving without expecting any reward in return. Thus, an environment that would help foster empathy
and a social upbringing that emphasizes doing things for the sake of doing them, rather than for
rewards, would help people maintain the altruism that they are born with.
Based on my observations, the processes that discourage Altruism are the similar to those that
encourage conformity. Namely, the socializing forces of the media and education, mixed with the lack
of a truly close-knit community, lead to conformity.
Institutions like the media are powerful factors in conformity. From the moment people are
born, for example, we are told that boys must act one way, and girls another. Even if we openly
dismiss social norms and mores as too conformist, they work their way into our subconscious. Thus,
someone may dismiss male gender roles as seen in Axe body spray commercials as brutish and idiotic.
Yet, I have found myself questioning, on an almost unconscious level, whether I should change how I
dress and act in order to be more accepted and successful in life. As children, we are constantly
bombarded by messages that we must be a certain way lest we be cast aside by society. Whether this
be from mass media and large institutions, or from individual interactions, the pressure to conform to
social mores is overwhelming.
Since the town which I come from has no real communal aspects, such as small, close homes
and nearby public gathering areas, the desire to have social interactions becomes greater. I believe that
people want to be validated and accepted by others, and in order to do this, many conform. Thus, at my
high school, there were troves of people whom dressed the same, talked the same, and acted the same.
Sometimes certain alpha students would pick up a trend and make it cool, resulting in conformity by
the rest of the student body. One year, for example, playing the game Pokemon became a popular
-
8/3/2019 Soc370 Paper
4/5
trend. What was once the lonely activity of nerdy, social rejects was now the highlight of the day for
all the coolest people. People also conformed in the masses to the idea of school spirit, likely out of
their desire to be part of a communal, unifying thing.
The desire to be outstanding and better than others resulted in widespread conformity as well.
The competitive drive found in many people reinforced the desire to he accepted, even heralded, by
others. As a child, I remember my parents telling me that I had to be better than my friends more
polite, more intelligent, etc. This brought about in me a desire to be better. Yet I feel that I did not
actively try to conform to any normative image in society. At times, I may have tried to actively reject
conformity, thereby conforming to some other idea about how to look and act. But it was, ironically,
my upbringing in a competitive and conformist society that led me to develop my theories about what
forces create conformity, and resist those forces.
Some aspects of conformity are less voluntary, and may even result in resistance to conformity.
For example, in elementary school, I was required to wear a uniform, and if I violated the uniform
policy in any way, I would be punished. This punishment led me to question the the uniform policy,
and helped me realize that it was merely a form of conformity that, in my opinion, had no real purpose.
Yet others did not question authority as much, as the culture in my town emphasized respect to those in
power, likely because so many whom lived there we in positions of privilege and power themselves.
Some of my family, particularly my cousin Robby, would often talk to me about his
philosophical ideas on life. This presented me with a unique perspective on how the world works,
which allowed me to escape the conformity of the town I was raised in. My cousin's thoughts
encouraged me to think more critically about what people do. Thus, when people conformed to school
spirit or drinking at parties in high school, I resisted those aspects of conformity.
Yet, even when people rejected conformity or authority, they conformed to another social norm.
Disrespecting authority had no purpose other than standing out and becoming more popular. Rejecting
the social mores of the predominantly white, upper class student body resulted in students whom
-
8/3/2019 Soc370 Paper
5/5
conformed to a more goth style. When I rejected the social norm of drinking and partying, I
conformed to my family's rules against any sort of excessive drinking.
Thus, people conform because they have been bombarded by various social forces with ideas
about social norms. In order to be accepted, people conform to these norms. These norms may be
implanted in their heads or simply forced upon them via authoritarian rules. It was this overwhelming
message to conform, combined with an outside perspective, which helped me to develop my ideas
about conformity and gave me the desire to critique conformity.