social exchange theory john thibaut & harold kelley
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY
John Thibaut & Harold Kelley
![Page 2: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
TRIBUTARIES
John von Neumann- games and economic/social behavior: parallel or opposite interest, perfect or imperfect information, rational decision or chance influence. ‘Strategy of anticipation’, or need to take the other actor/s into account. Win lose situations, or the zero-sum game.
![Page 3: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Cont.
John Nash- games are not always zero-sum; interactions include the possibility of mixed motive games.
The minimax principle- people seek to maximize benefits and minimize costs.
![Page 4: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Interdependence Theory
of Thibaut and Kelley
![Page 5: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Premises and Assumptions Relational outcomes are linked with
the actions of others. Members of the dyad can accurately
predict outcomes and will choose the best.
Not necessarily win/lose; interdependence implies that we negotiate our moves based on anticipation of the actions of others.
![Page 6: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
PRISONER’S DILEMMA
Potential for gain at the others expense.
Also potential for win/win or lose/lose outcome.
Both parties want optimum outcome.
![Page 7: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
RESULTS Outcome- rewards minus costs
represented by a single number. Comparison Level (CL)- satisfaction
depends on expectation; the threshold above which an outcome seems attractive.
Comparison level of alternatives (CLalt)- the worst outcome one will accept and stay in the relationship.
![Page 8: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Some predictions….
Outcome>CLalt>CL = satisfying, stable, nondependent.
CL>CLalt>Outcome = not satisfying, break relationship, continue unhappy.
CL>Outcome>CLalt = highly unsatisfying, can’t break away, dependent and unhappy…the Prisoner’s Dilemma.
![Page 9: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Dependence and Control Outcomes > CLalt = high
dependence. Outcomes < CLalt = low dependence. T and K identify three types of
control: reflexive, fate and behavior. These forms are juggled in
interdependent relationships. The relationship is not evaluated in an
evaluative sense.
![Page 10: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Collective and Ind Outcomes
Why do people often act in ways that appear contrary to their own interests, even with knowledge of outcome values?
T and K see this as evidence of collective, social behavior.
![Page 11: SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY John Thibaut & Harold Kelley](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071705/56649cf45503460f949c24f4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Anxiety- reframing the conflict to relieve tension; mentally altering the numbers by redefining the situation.
Normative element- turning to collective principle for action when a situation is confusing.
Temporal element- focus on future rewards.