Socialism in Marx’s Capital

Paresh Chattopadhyay

Towards a Dealienated World

MARX, ENGELS, AND MARXISMS

Marx, Engels, and Marxisms

Series EditorsMarcello MustoYork University

Toronto, ON, Canada

Terrell CarverUniversity of Bristol

Bristol, UK

The Marx renaissance is underway on a global scale. Wherever the critiqueof capitalism re-emerges, there is an intellectual and political demand fornew, critical engagements with Marxism. The peer-reviewed series Marx,Engels and Marxisms (edited by Marcello Musto & Terrell Carver, withBabak Amini, Francesca Antonini, Paula Rauhala & Kohei Saito as Assis-tant Editors) publishes monographs, edited volumes, critical editions,reprints of old texts, as well as translations of books already publishedin other languages. Our volumes come from a wide range of politicalperspectives, subject matters, academic disciplines and geographical areas,producing an eclectic and informative collection that appeals to a diverseand international audience. Our main areas of focus include: the oeuvreof Marx and Engels, Marxist authors and traditions of the 19th and 20thcenturies, labour and social movements, Marxist analyses of contemporaryissues, and reception of Marxism in the world.

More information about this series athttp://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14812

Paresh Chattopadhyay

Socialism in Marx’sCapital

Towards a Dealienated World

Paresh ChattopadhyayUniversity of QuebecMontreal, QC, Canada

ISSN 2524-7123 ISSN 2524-7131 (electronic)Marx, Engels, and MarxismsISBN 978-3-030-55202-2 ISBN 978-3-030-55203-9 (eBook)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55203-9

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to SpringerNature Switzerland AG 2021This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by thePublisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rightsof translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction onmicrofilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage andretrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodologynow known or hereafter developed.The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that suchnames are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free forgeneral use.The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and informa-tion in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neitherthe publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, withrespect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have beenmade. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published mapsand institutional affiliations.

Cover image: © stellalevi/DigitalVision Vectors/Getty Image

This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer NatureSwitzerland AGThe registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland

Dedicated to the memory of Rosa Luxembourg, a great revolutionary anda great Democrat.

Titles Published

1. Terrell Carver & Daniel Blank, A Political History of the Editionsof Marx and Engels’s “German Ideology” Manuscripts, 2014.

2. Terrell Carver & Daniel Blank, Marx and Engels’s “German Ideol-ogy” Manuscripts: Presentation and Analysis of the “Feuerbachchapter,” 2014.

3. Alfonso Maurizio Iacono, The History and Theory of Fetishism,2015.

4. Paresh Chattopadhyay, Marx’s Associated Mode of Production: ACritique of Marxism, 2016.

5. Domenico Losurdo, Class Struggle: A Political and PhilosophicalHistory, 2016.

6. Frederick Harry Pitts, Critiquing Capitalism Today: New Ways toRead Marx, 2017.

7. Ranabir Samaddar, Karl Marx and the Postcolonial Age, 2017.8. George Comninel, Alienation and Emancipation in the Work of

Karl Marx, 2018.9. Jean-Numa Ducange & Razmig Keucheyan (Eds.), The End of

the Democratic State: Nicos Poulantzas, a Marxism for the 21stCentury, 2018.

10. Robert X. Ware, Marx on Emancipation and Socialist Goals:Retrieving Marx for the Future, 2018.

11. Xavier LaFrance & Charles Post (Eds.), Case Studies in the Originsof Capitalism, 2018.

vii

viii TITLES PUBLISHED

12. John Gregson, Marxism, Ethics, and Politics: The Work of AlasdairMacIntyre, 2018.

13. Vladimir Puzone & Luis Felipe Miguel (Eds.), The BrazilianLeft in the 21st Century: Conflict and Conciliation in PeripheralCapitalism, 2019.

14. James Muldoon & Gaard Kets (Eds.), The German Revolution andPolitical Theory, 2019.

15. Michael Brie, Rediscovering Lenin: Dialectics of Revolution andMetaphysics of Domination, 2019.

16. August H. Nimtz, Marxism versus Liberalism: Comparative Real-Time Political Analysis, 2019.

17. Gustavo Moura de Cavalcanti Mello and Mauricio de Souza Saba-dini (Eds.), Financial Speculation and Fictitious Profits: A MarxistAnalysis, 2019.

18. Shaibal Gupta, Marcello Musto & Babak Amini (Eds), Karl Marx’sLife, Ideas, and Influences: A Critical Examination on the Bicente-nary, 2019.

19. Igor Shoikhedbrod, Revisiting Marx’s Critique of Liberalism:Rethinking Justice, Legality, and Rights, 2019.

20. Juan Pablo Rodríguez, Resisting Neoliberal Capitalism in Chile:The Possibility of Social Critique, 2019.

21. Kaan Kangal, Friedrich Engels and the Dialectics of Nature, 2020.22. Victor Wallis, Socialist Practice: Histories and Theories, 2020.23. Alfonso Maurizio Iacono, The Bourgeois and the Savage: A Marxian

Critique of the Image of the Isolated Individual in Defoe, Turgot andSmith, 2020.

24. Terrell Carver, Engels before Marx, 2020.25. Jean-Numa Ducange, Jules Guesde: The Birth of Socialism and

Marxism in France, 2020.26. Antonio Oliva, Ivan Novara & Angel Oliva (Eds.), Marx and

Contemporary Critical Theory: The Philosophy of Real Abstraction27. Francesco Biagi, Henri Lefebvre’s Critical Theory of Space28. Stefano Petrucciani, The Ideas of Karl Marx: A Critical Introduc-

tion29. Terrell Carver, The Life and Thought of Friedrich Engels, 30th

Anniversary Edition

TITLES PUBLISHED ix

Titles Forthcoming

Giuseppe Vacca, Alternative Modernities: Antonio Gramsci’s Twen-tieth CenturyKevin B. Anderson, Kieran Durkin & Heather Brown (Eds.),Raya Dunayevskaya’s Intersectional Marxism: Race, Gender, and theDialectics of LiberationGianfranco Ragona & Monica Quirico, Frontier Socialism: Self-organisation and Anti-capitalismVesa Oittinen, Marx’s Russian MomentKohei Saito (Ed.), Reexamining Engels’s Legacy in the 21st CenturyKolja Lindner, Marx, Marxism and the Question of EurocentrismRyuji Sasaki, A New Introduction to Karl Marx: New Materialism,Critique of Political Economy, and the Concept of MetabolismJean-Numa Ducange & Elisa Marcobelli (Eds.), Selected Writings ofJean Jaures: On Socialism, Pacifism and MarxismAdriana Petra, Intellectuals and Communist Culture: Itineraries,Problems and Debates in Post-war ArgentinaMarco Di Maggio, The Rise and Fall of Communist Parties in Franceand ItalyGeorge C. Comninel, The Feudal Foundations of Modern EuropeJames Steinhoff, Critiquing the New Autonomy of ImmaterialLabour: A Marxist Study of Work in the Artificial IntelligenceIndustrySpencer A. Leonard, Marx, the India Question, and the Crisis ofCosmopolitanismJoe Collins, Applying Marx’s Capital to the 21st centuryLevy del Aguila Marchena, Communism, Political Power andPersonal Freedom in MarxJeong Seongjin, Korean Capitalism in the 21st Century: MarxistAnalysis and AlternativesMarcello Mustè, Marxism and Philosophy of Praxis: An ItalianPerspective from Labriola to GramsciSatoshi Matsui, Normative Theories of Liberalism and Socialism:Marxist Analysis of ValuesShannon Brincat, Dialectical Dialogues in Contemporary World Poli-tics: A Meeting of Traditions in Global Comparative PhilosophyStefano Petrucciani, Theodor W. Adorno’s Philosophy, Society, andAesthetics

x TITLES PUBLISHED

Francesca Antonini, Reassessing Marx’s Eighteenth Brumaire: Dicta-torship, State, and RevolutionThomas Kemple, Capital after Classical Sociology: The Faustian Livesof Social TheoryTsuyoshi Yuki, Socialism, Markets and the Critique of Money: TheTheory of “Labour Note”V Geetha, Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar and the Question of Socialismin IndiaXavier Vigna, A Political History of Factories in France: The Workers’Insubordination of 1968Atila Melegh, Anti-Migrant Populism in Eastern Europe andHungary: A Marxist AnalysisMarie-Cecile Bouju, A Political History of the Publishing Houses ofthe French Communist PartyGustavo Moura de Cavalcanti Mello & Henrique Pereira Braga(Eds.), Wealth and Poverty in Contemporary Brazilian CapitalismPeter McMylor, Graeme Kirkpatrick & Simin Fadaee (Eds.),Marxism, Religion, and Emancipatory PoliticsMauro Buccheri, Radical Humanism for the Left: The Quest forMeaning in Late CapitalismRémy Herrera, Confronting Mainstream Economics to OvercomeCapitalismTamás Krausz, Eszter Bartha (Eds.), Socialist Experiences in EasternEurope: A Hungarian PerspectiveMartin Cortés, Marxism, Time and Politics: On the Autonomy of thePoliticalJoão Antonio de Paula, Huga da Gama Cerqueira, Eduardo daMotta e Albuquer & Leonardo de Deus, Marxian Economics for the21st Century: Revaluating Marx’s Critique of Political EconomyZhi Li, The Concept of the Individual in the Thought of Karl MarxLelio Demichelis, Marx, Alienation and Techno-capitalismMichael Brie & Jörn Schütrumpf, Rosa Luxemburg: A RevolutionaryMarxist at the Limits of MarxismDong-Min Rieu, A Mathematical Approach to Marxian ValueTheory: Time, Money, and Labor ProductivitySalvatore Prinzi, Representation, Expression, and Institution: ThePhilosophy of Merleau-Ponty and Castoriadis

TITLES PUBLISHED xi

Agon Hamza, Slavoj Žižek and the Reconstruction of MarxismKei Ehara, Japanese Discourse on the Marxian Theory of FinanceMiguel Vedda, Siegfried Kracauer, or, The Allegories of ImprovisationMarcello Musto, Karl Marx’s Writings on Alienation

Prologue

In the European musical tradition, there are two compositions standingopposite to each other in spirit. The first is Hayden’s so-called “Farewell”symphony in which the composer arranges things in such a way thatthe orchestral players come to the end of their music one by one, and,putting out the candles on their music-stands, steal away from the scene.Ultimately, only Hayden and Luigi Tomassini remained with their instru-ments. This was a gentle remainder to the Prince that the musicians wereoverdue for their holiday. In other words, things begin in a big way andthen decrease gradually till nothing notable remains.

The opposite is Ravel’s “Bolero” which the composer created for afamous dancer to dance to. Ravel wanted some music that got louderand more exciting right from the beginning to end. So, he wrote a longtune and repeated it over and over against a background of the “bolero”rhythm played on a side drum. As the piece goes on, the tune andthe rhythm are hammered relentlessly into our ears until they becomealmost unbearable. All the while we can hear the tune on more and moreinstruments until the whole orchestra is hard at work.

The lessons of these two exercises are that Hayden’s music reflectsthe quick beginning and equally quick end of what happened with theearly twentieth-century revolution(s). This cannot be the pattern of thefuture popular revolutions, whereas Ravel’s work represents, in Marx’sexpression, “a revolution in permanence.”

xiii

Contents

1 Introduction 11 Uniqueness of Marx’s Economic Work 12 The Theme 83 Socialism in Marx 104 Overview of the New Society 12References 19

2 Labour, Alienation, Accumulation in Capitalism 211 What Is Capital? 212 Alienation 363 Marx on Wages 424 Surplus Labour and Accumulation 48References 54

3 Capitalism as a Transitional Society 571 The Role of Credit and the Double Existence of Capital 582 Capitalism as a Transitional Society 663 Capitalism the Progenitor of Socialism 69References 73

xv

xvi CONTENTS

4 Socialism and Democracy 751 The Case of Russia in 1917 762 The October Revolution 83References 86

5 Socialism and Emancipation 891 Labour, Production, and the Individual After Capital 932 Socialism as Emancipation 98References 108

6 The New Society: Towards a Dealienated World 1111 The Individual 1122 What Is Socialism? 1173 The Dealienated Individual in the New Society 133References 139

References 143

Index 149

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

Abstract This introductory chapter begins with a discussion of theuniqueness of Marx’s economic work and situates his work with regardto political economy, emphasizing that Marx’s was a critique of what heconsidered as a bourgeois science. The chapter then outlines the themeand the main argument of the book, after clarifying the term “socialism.”It concludes by providing a short overview of the basic features of the newsociety and the many different names that Marx used to refer to it, suchas “Association” or “communism,” touching upon major themes that arestudied throughout the rest of the book.

Keywords Association · Communism · Socialism · Political economy

1 Uniqueness of Marx’s Economic Work

Before we embark on our subject, it is very important to understand whatkind of economic work Marx produced, even when it is admitted thathe was, in Schumpeter’s (1997) words, one of the “great economists.”Not many readers of Marx dealt with this question. One of them wasKarl Korsch who treated this in his 1932 “Introduction” to his edition ofMarx’s Capital. After citing Marx’s words that the “ultimate objective of

© The Author(s), under exclusive license toSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021P. Chattopadhyay, Socialism in Marx’s Capital, Marx, Engels,and Marxisms, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55203-9_1

1

2 P. CHATTOPADHYAY

the book was to reveal the economic laws of motion of modern society”(1971, p. 40), Korsch went on to add that these words of Marx:

already implied that Capital was not meant to be simply a contributionto the traditional academic study of economics. Capital was also, as itssubtitle declared, a ‘critique of political economy,’ and this rubric signifiesmuch more than the adoption of a critical attitude towards the individualdoctrines advanced by this or that academic theorist, a critique of politicaleconomy as such. (1971, p. 40)

Korsch’s words, undoubtedly important, however, in our view, remaininsufficient as an explanation of the very important term “critique” inthis connection. This involves Marx’s entire attitude to political economyas a “bourgeois science” to which Marx’s critique stands in opposition.

First of all, political economy was always considered by Marx as“bourgeois science.” This opposition started with his 1844 ParisianManuscripts . Marx wrote there that “the mediating movement of theexchanging individuals is not a human relation. It is an abstract relationbetween private property and private property” (Marx, 1966, p. 248—emphasis in original). The self-attributed term “economist” in Marx’s(1847) opening salvo against Proudhon, if not read with (pre)caution,would appear to contradict clearly what he himself wrote in the bodyof the same text: “The economists are the scientific representatives ofthe bourgeois class just as the socialists and communists are the theoreti-cians of the proletarian class” (Marx, 1963c, p. 92). The most explicitopposition between political economy and its critique comes out in the“Afterword” to the second edition of Capital Vol. 1 (unfortunatelypassed over even by most of Marx’s followers including the great Marxreaders such as Korsch).

After observing that the peculiar historical development of the Germansociety excluded all original work in bourgeois economy in Germany(unlike in England and France), Marx stressed that this did not preventthe rise of the “critique.” “In so far as this critique represents a class itcan only represent that class whose historical mission/profession [Beruf ]is to revolutionise the capitalist mode of production and, finally to abolishclasses” (Marx, 1954, pp. 25, 26). Marx’s earlier pronouncement on the“victory of the political economy of labour over the political economy ofproperty” (in his own German version “property” replaced by “capital”)made in the famous 1864 “Inaugural Address” is to be understood in

1 INTRODUCTION 3

the same sense of opposition. It is worth noting what Engels wrote inhis first (1867) review of Capital Vol. 1, characterizing the book as the“political economy of the working class reduced to its scientific expres-sion.” He added: “Who has eyes to see, sees here clearly expressed thedemand for a social revolution. Here is a question not of workers’ associ-ation with state capital à la Lassalle but of the abolition of capital itself”(1973, p. 216—emphasis added).

There is also another misrepresentation of Marx’s economic work:Marx has been placed among the classical political economists in the lineof Adam Smith and particularly David Ricardo. The great economist andMarx sympathizer J. Schumpeter remarked along this line that Marx wasthe only “great follower of Ricardo” (Schumpeter, 1994, pp. 390, 396).Similarly, the so-called “surplus school” around the legacy of P. Sraffahas placed Marx among the classical political economists, as a follower ofRicardo’s value theory, one of the most eminent being the late PierangeloGaregnani. Recently, the well-known Left economist Anwar Shaikh in hisvoluminous work Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crisis (2016) hasalso placed Marx among the classics.

Let us remark en passant the very fact that Marx always consideredpolitical economy as a bourgeois science to which he opposed his critique.Does not this itself negate the affirmation that Marx was also a “classi-cal” economist? Let us proceed a little further with the argument whyMarx cannot be considered as just another representative of the classicalpolitical economy. Some of these arguments will be further elaboratedin the text below. First, there is a fundamental difference between theway the very term “capital” is considered by the classics (indeed, by thewhole of the bourgeois political economy) and the way Marx considers it.Thus, for the former “capital” is a thing—“stock,” “machines and instru-ments,” “implements,” “accumulated labour”—while for Marx, “capital”is a specific social relation of production represented in a thing andappearing at a particular phase of human history (Marx, 1992, p. 843).1

1The eminent Russian economist V. P. Shkredov wrote that Marx’s “discovery of thedifference as well as the connection” between capital as a social relation and capitalas a (material) thing “constituted a revolutionary upheaval [revolyusionnogo perevorota]”(1973, p. 165) in political economy. In this connection, let us remind the readers ofa very interesting and significant remark made by Rosa Luxemburg: “Marx’s economicdoctrine is the offspring of the bourgeois political economy, a child whose birth wouldcost the mother’s life” (1981, p. 591).