society's grand challenges in engineering as a context for middle school stem instruction:...
TRANSCRIPT
Society's Grand Challenges in Engineering as a context for middle school STEM
instruction:
Briefing on proposed project
January 19 and 21, 2010
Investigators:
Amy Wendt, Susan Hagness and Steven Cramer (Engineering)
Kimberly Howard and Allen Phelps (Education)
2
NSF ITEST Program
• The National Science Foundation is seeking solutions to “help ensure the depth and breadth of the STEM workforce.”
ITEST: Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers STEM: science, technology, engineering and math
• Program solicitation link
• NSF proposal deadline: early February
• Letters of support from participating schools needed by Feb. 1
• Project duration: 3 years our proposed dates: 9/1/2010-8/31/2013
3
UW ITEST proposal
• Project goal: create interest in engineering among a larger and more diverse
population of middle school students
• Strategy: Introduce grand challenges in engineering (GCE) in math and science
instruction Create a school-based GCE community of teachers & counselors to:
Develop, implement and evaluate GCE instructional resources Increase awareness of grand-challenge related careers that utilize
math and science skills Collect and use data to:
evaluate:• classroom implementation of instructional materials• changes in student perceptions about engineering and its
relation to personal goals improve/expand instructional resources
4
Motivation: Diversity in Engineering
• Source: American Society of Engineering Educators, 2008• Down from 19.5% in 2005 and 21.2% in 1999• Compared to ~ 50% in biological sciences
5
Diversity in Engineering
6
Diversity in Engineering
• Women’s Experiences in College Engineering Project Survey of ~25,000 undergraduate women in engineering programs at
53 institutions,1999-2001
A top reason why women enter engineering: attraction to the altruistic kind of work engineers do
Critical factor in retention: exposing women early on to how engineering has led to
improvements in society and the quality of people’s lives
“Final Report of the Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) Project,” Goodman Research Group, Inc., Cambridge, MA, April 2002.
7
Grand Challenges in Engineering
Sustainability• Make solar power economical• Provide energy from fusion• Develop carbon sequestration methods• Manage the nitrogen cycle• Provide access to clean water• Restore and improve urban infrastructureVulnerability• Prevent nuclear terror• Secure cyberspace
Health
• Advance health informatics
• Engineer better medicine
• Reverse-engineer the brain
Joy of Living
• Enhance virtual reality
• Advance personalized learning
• Engineer the tools of scientific discovery
http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/
8
Background: New GCE course at UW
• InterEgr 102: Cross-disciplinary approach to first-year engineering education Builds on NAE themes Highlights opportunities to positively shape the world’s future
• Case studies format: Modules prepared by both instructors and students
Based on existing literature – news articles, government reports and research journals Wide range of presentation topics Students:
Write written reports Prepare/deliver
• Oral presentations• Poster presentations
9
GCE at UW: course for 1st year studentsTheme 1: Engineering challenges on a personal scale Diagnosis/treatment of disease, assistive technologies, rehab
engineering, biometrics, …
Theme 3: Engineering for developing communitiesWater, housing, health care, lighting, energy, information, …
Theme 4: Engineering the megacity Pollution, transportation, energy, natural disasters, security, …
Theme 5: Global engineering challengesEnergy, terrorism, biodiversity, pandemics, climate change, …
Theme 6: Engineering beyond planet Earth Space travel, inhabiting space, near-earth objects, extraterrestrial
communication, …
Theme 2: Engineering the Wisconsin Idea Energy, regional eco-systems, transportation, security, …
10
GCE at UW: example course content
Topic: early detection/warning to prevent earthquake damage• Seismometers commonly used to locate the epicenter after the
quake has occurred• How?
Exploit differences between P and S waves1
Nondestructive P (primary) wave speed: 6-7 km/s Destructive S (secondary) wave speed: 3-4 km/s
• Interactive illustrations on National Geographic web site:http://www.nationalgeographic.com/forcesofnature/interactive/index.html?section=e
Locate an earthquake – Lab 6
• Let’s try it ourselves!
11
Snapshot from GCE case study
Determining location of earthquake epicenter• Seismometers commonly used to locate the epicenter after
the quake has occurred• Example: 3 stations record seismic activity
Where is the epicenter?
P wave speed: 6 km/sS wave speed: 3 km/s
A
BC
tp=0ts=10 s
tp=10 sts=30 s
tp=20 sts=50 s
60 km
12
Snapshot from GCE case study
Determining location of earthquake epicenter• Seismometers commonly used to locate the epicenter after
the quake has occurred• Example: 3 stations record seismic activity
Where is the epicenter?
A
BC
60 km
P wave speed: 6 km/sS wave speed: 3 km/s
How far away?
13
Snapshot from GCE case study
Determining location of earthquake epicenter• Seismometers commonly used to locate the epicenter after
the quake has occurred• Example: 3 stations record seismic activity
Where is the epicenter?
A
BC
60 km
P wave speed: 6 km/sS wave speed: 3 km/s
60 km
14
Snapshot from GCE case study
Determining location of earthquake epicenter• Seismometers commonly used to locate the epicenter after
the quake has occurred• Example: 3 stations record seismic activity
Where is the epicenter?
A
BC
60 km
P wave speed: 6 km/sS wave speed: 3 km/s
How far away?
15
Snapshot from GCE case study
Determining location of earthquake epicenter• Seismometers commonly used to locate the epicenter after
the quake has occurred• Example: 3 stations record seismic activity
Where is the epicenter?
A
BC
60 km
P wave speed: 6 km/sS wave speed: 3 km/s
120 km
16
Snapshot from GCE case study
Determining location of earthquake epicenter• Seismometers commonly used to locate the epicenter after
the quake has occurred• Example: 3 stations record seismic activity
Where is the epicenter?
A
BC
60 km
P wave speed: 6 km/sS wave speed: 3 km/s
How far away?
17
Snapshot from GCE case study
Determining location of earthquake epicenter• Seismometers commonly used to locate the epicenter after
the quake has occurred• Example: 3 stations record seismic activity
Where is the epicenter?
A
BC
60 km
P wave speed: 6 km/sS wave speed: 3 km/s
180 km
18
Snapshot from GCE case study
Determining location of earthquake epicenter• Seismometers commonly used to locate the epicenter after
the quake has occurred• Example: 3 stations record seismic activity
Where is the epicenter?
A
BC
60 km
epicenter
P wave speed: 6 km/sS wave speed: 3 km/s
19
Alignment with instructional standards• This instructional task (determining the location of the earthquake
epicenter) directly aligns with “Mathematical Practice” standards that are being proposed for the State Common Core Standards in math.
• See: http://www.corestandards.org/Standards/index.htm• Quoting the proposed Mathematics Practice standard:
Proficient students expect mathematics to make sense. They take an active stance in solving mathematical problems. When faced with a non-routine problem, they have the courage to plunge in and try something, and they have the procedural and conceptual tools to carry through. They are experimenters and inventors, and can adapt known strategies to new problems. They think strategically.
• More specifically, this task requires or could be developed in ways that students are required to demonstrate the following standards: Construct viable arguments Make sense of complex problems Look for and make use of structure
20
Impact of GCE course at UW
• Higher % female representation than other UW “Introduction to Engineering” courses
UW GCE course
Other engineering intro. courses
Society’s Grand Challenges in Engineering as a Context for Middle School Instruction in
STEM
Proposal in preparation for submission to the NSF ITEST program
22
UW team members
• Amy Wendt, Electrical and Computer Engineering• Susan Hagness, Electrical and Computer Engineering• Steven Cramer, Civil and Environmental Engineering• Kimberly Howard, Counseling Psychology• Allen Phelps, Education Leadership
23
UW ITEST proposal
• Project goal: create interest in engineering among a larger and more diverse
population of middle school students
• Strategy: Introduce grand challenges in engineering (GCE) in math and science
instruction Create a school-based GCE community of teachers & counselors to:
Develop, implement and evaluate GCE instructional resources Increase awareness of grand-challenge related careers that utilize
math and science skills Collect and use data to:
evaluate:• classroom implementation of instructional materials• changes in teacher/student perceptions about engineering,
and its relation to student personal goals improve/expand instructional resources
24
Current status
25
Goal: GCE awareness through multiple channels
• Heighten awareness of GCE throughout the school: Teachers Counselors Peers
• Shape students’ sense that STEM careers are possible & interesting for them Messages guided by Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT): Self efficacy: belief that one possesses the capability to perform
STEM-related activities Outcomes expectations: engaging in STEM-related activities
advances one’s personal goals
26
Social Cognitive Career Theory
27
Innovation and Research Network
28
GCE Implementation: instructional pilot
• Pilot GCE module will provide alternative, context-rich approaches to teaching core content
• GCE module duration: 1-3 weeks
• GCE module will include instructional materials that: Address state/regional standards for the topic GCE material will complement instructional content to create a “story
line” for the content
• Before/after student questionnaire on perceptions about engineering
29
Pilot GCE module development
• UW participants will research GCE topics for inclusion in pilot module
• UW and Madison area school participants will develop instructional activities to complement GCE material – academic year 2010-2011
• Summer Institute 2011: All participants gather on UW-Madison campus for one week UW participants will provide overviews of:
Grand Challenges in Engineering Social Cognitive Career Theory GCE middle school pilot module status
All will discuss, refine, modify and improve pilot module Middle school educators will finalize module curriculum and
implementation plan for their schools
30
Timeline
Academic year Fall Semester Spring Semester Summer
2010-2011 Assemble GCE content; work with local schools on instructional content
Development continues
Summer Institute; Finalize pilot module(s)
2011-2012 Implement pilot;Evaluate; Develop additional module(s)
Implementation, development and evaluation continue
Summer Institute; Evaluation and module revision/development
2012-2013 Implement modules;Evaluate
Implementation and evaluation continue
Evaluation completed; Final report
31
How to participate?
• Commit a team of 3-5 educators from your school – participation from summer 2011 to the end of the 2011-2012 academic year
• Local schools may also participate in GCE module development during the 2010-2011 academic year
• Travel expenses – stipend and travel expenses provided for Summer Institute participation
• We request letters of commitment to be included in our proposal to NSF Use school letterhead Submit to Prof. Amy Wendt by Monday, Feb. 1
Email pdf copy to [email protected] Or fax to 608-262-1267
32
Summary (& input for letter of commitment)• UW-Madison proposal entitled “Society’s Grand Challenges in
Engineering as a Context for Middle School Instruction in STEM”• To be submitted to NSF ITEST program – 3 year project• Goal:
attract and retain a more diverse pool of students, particularly women, into the technology workforce
• Motivation: studies showing an attraction among female students to the kind of altruistic work
engineers do • Strategy:
develop curriculum-specific grand challenges instructional modules appropriate for middle school
teacher/counselor training to support classroom use of these materials Evaluate changes in teacher/student perceptions about engineering, and its
relation to student personal goals• Instructional materials
will be modeled after the "Grand Challenges" curriculum currently in use at the UW Madison College of Engineering
school teams (3-5 participants/school) will contribute to module development at working Summer Institutes at UW-Madison in 2011 and 2012
will be piloted in schools during 2011-12 and 2012-13 school years