sociology of (contemporary) urban public spaces
TRANSCRIPT
Changes and evolution in the relation between the urban setting and the public realm
Sociology of [contemporary] urban public spaces
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 1
OUTLINE• 2 main (interrelated) perspectives:
a) Public space, civic engagement, citizenship;
b) Crisis of public space in contemporary city;
c) Persistence of urban public space (new ways to think public space);
• On the road: distinction between urban public space and the public sphere (Habermas);
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 2
the rise of a public SPHERE in the city: the Greek polis
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 3
• Polis, active participation of free-citizens in the political life of the city-state;• Establishment of a public sphere separated from the private dimension (oikos);• Public dimension: basis for the political life (Arendt 1958), world in common, where is
possible to discuss the affairs of the community;• Public sphere (POLIS) = public space (AGORÀ);
the rise of a public SPHERE in the city: the European civitas
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 4
• Symbol of an open society, held together by a shared common pact; • Spatial manifestation in the collective themes of the Urbs;• Ex. The PIAZZA and the 3 powers (Church, Commune, Chamber of commerce);
what is the legacy of this conceptualisation of the public dimension (POLIS/agorà and CIVITAS/piazza) in contemporary societies?
Question time
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 5
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 6
…. Idea that PUBLIC SPACE IS…
…the PLACE of POLITICAL LIFE……the PLACE of CITINZESHIP…
PUBLIC SPACE = PUBLIC SPHERE
Public sphere ≠ Public placeImmaterial sphere of communication, in which a public opinion on topics of general interest can be formedthrough debate and deliberative mechanisms;
It is a (democratic) form of communication: decision are made through a public debate among different opinions;All opinions have the same power;
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 7
Habermas, Jurgen. [1961] 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 8
Press, Salons, Coffee houses
In the bourgeois society, Public opinion is externalized to counterbalance the voice of the state;It is a way through which social power and political domination are submitted to the democratic
precept of publicity;
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 9
Blog, forum, mailing list, social media
• The only places regarded as real public spaces are those where there is political participation and citizenship activation;
• Inclusion of immaterial spaces, which are relevant for the formation of a public opinion;
• Focus on the relationship between communication and democracy;
An evolution A misunderstanding
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 10
Political philosophy; Sciences of communication
This interpretation leads to an impasse: where are the public space in contemporary cities? Anywhere!
What is a city?Urban Sociology; Symbolic interactionism
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 11
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 12
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 13
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 14
• Simmel Metropolis and the mental life; The Stranger
• Chicago school: Park, Burgess, McKenzie The City; Park Human Migration and the Marginal Man; Wirth Urbanism as a way of life
• Jacobs The Death and Life of the Great American cities
• Lefebvre The Urban Revolution; Differential Manifesto;
• Lofland A World of Strangers: Order and Action in Urban Public Space; The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory
• Goffmann Behaviour in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings
• Sennett The fall of public man
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 15
the public realm of city
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 16
Coexistence in space and in time of a great (social, cultural, architectural) heterogeneity;
Interaction among different elements and production of hybrids (cosmopolite, stranger, marginal man, urban animal);
Living in this setting is impossible without civilization, that is the activity that places individuals away from each other and allows them to enjoy each other’s company; Shared norms and rules that establish the ability to build a bond, even in situations of social distance;
Recognition of legitimacy for each one to be present in the urban space;
Urban revolution, the right to the city (Lefebvre);
Do you agree with this perspective? What is left away?
Question time
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 17
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 18
The issue of power• Valentine (2008):«Romanticization of urban encounter […] potentially naïve assumption that
contact with ‘others’ necessarily translates into respect for difference»
«Spatial proximity does not equate with meaningful encounters»
• Chamboredon, Lemaire (1970), Proximité spatiale et distance sociale;
• Brighenti (2010) Public realm as an inter-visibility REGIMES (rules, norms, thresholds, defining the access to the public realm);
• Struggle for the definition of the LEGITIMATE public, who can access, use and find representation in the city and its public spaces;
• Lefebvre, The right to the city;
A synthesis with a definitionPUBLIC SPACE as a relational arena,
where people and social groups form different publicsthat become inter-visible in the public,
according to norms and rules defining and managing the access to the public realm,
which are the outcome of the competition (struggle) between different interests,
and forms different inter-visibility regimes;
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 19
contemporary city and public space
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 20
Suburbanization: intimacy and self-segregation;
Mobility: public space as derived of movement; different
paths in space and time;
Global city and commodification: city-users, deny of the
right to the city;
The end of public space in the contemporary city?
MOBILITY
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 21
Suburbanization, gated communities
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 22
Commodification
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 23
IS it possible to find another interpretation?
Question time
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 24
Amin a. (2008), COLLECTIVE CULTURE AND URBAN PUBLIC SPACE
• PUBLIC SPACE = OPEN, CROWDED, DIVERSE, INCOMPLETE, IMPROVISED AND LIGHTLY REGULATED;
• TROWNTOGETHERNESS;• PUBLIC SETTING IS A SITUATED MULTIPLICITY OF CORPS,
OBJECTS, IMPULSES, USES, THAT CIRCULATE IN A DEFINED SPACE-TIME;
• THIS SETTING HAS NOT A DIRECT EFFECT (e.g. citizenship activation, sharing norms, etc.) BUT AN INDIRECT EFFECT
• In the public setting we experience a situated surplus…
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 25
Luca Daconto Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale - Università di Milano Bicocca
Gabriele Manella Dipartimento di Sociologia e Diritto dell’Economia - Università di Bologna
SALA BORSA as a public spacethe respondents’ point of view
27
openness
gratuity
meeting place
heterogeneity
neutrality
symbol
user-friendly
citizenship
Reading list – some suggestions• Amin A. (2008). Collective culture and urban public space. City 12(1): 5-24;
• Brighenti A. (2010). The Public realm of Public Space: On the Public Domain. Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale dell’Università di Trento Quaderno 49(marzo); http://web.unitn.it/files/quad49.pdf
• Carr, S. et al. (1992). Public Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Flusty S., “The banality of interdiction: surveillance, control and the displacement of diversity”, in International Journal of Urban and Regional research, vol.25, n.3, September 2001, pagg.658-664
• Mitchell D. (1995). The end of public space? People’s Park, definitions of the public and democracy. Annals of the Association of American geographers, 85(1): 108-133;
• Sennett R. (2008). The Public Realm http://www.richardsennett.com/site/senn/templates/general2.aspx?pageid=16&cc=gb
• Valentine G. (2008). Living with difference: reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3): 323-337;
• http://www.interculturalurbanism.com/?p=1255
• https://vimeo.com/111488563
• Daconto, Manella (forthcoming), Sala Borsa: plural presences and innovative public spaces
Piacenza, 19/10/2015Course analysis of temporary inhabitants in urban public spaces – Prof. citroni – 4CFU 28