soft cost savings in a vms/msp implementation
Post on 14-Sep-2014
923 views
DESCRIPTION
Quantifying Soft Cost Savings in a VMS/MSP ImplementationTRANSCRIPT
WHITEPAPERWHITEPAPER Quantifying Soft Cost Savings
QuantifyingSoft CostSavings ina VMS/MSPImplementation
© 2012 DCR Workforce, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DCR Workforce and Smart Track are Registered Trademarks. CCO — 082912
© 2012 DCR Workforce, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DCR Workforce and Smart Track are Registered Trademarks. CCO — 082912
Quantifying Soft Cost Savings
WHAT CONSTITUTES A SOFT SAVING?
Talent management is becoming the most cri! cal
diff eren! a! ng factor for success in today’s rapidly chang-
ing economic, business and demographic environment.
In an average American organiza! on today, between
one-quarter to one-third of its workforce consists of
temporary labor (agency contractors, independent
freelancers, interns, consultants, etc.). Handling such
huge numbers in a tradi! onal way typically yields a
diminishing margin of returns. Under these circumstances,
an eff ec! ve Con! ngent Worforce Program is no
longer a strategic advantage but an impera! ve for most
organiza! ons.
Gone are the days that demanded an elaborate
business case jus! fi ca! on to invest in a vendor manage-
ment system (VMS) or managed services program (MSP).
It is now an accepted fact that within the fi rst 18-24
months, an eff ec! ve MSP/VMS program can result in a
savings of 10 – 25% of the overall spend. Owing
to such huge benefi ts, both hard and so$ in nature, a
con! ngent workforce management program supported
by a VMS is being recognized as a de-facto benchmark
element for being a “Best-In-Class” organiza! on.
Hard savings are typically realized through volume
aggrega! on related discounts, supplier ra! onaliza! on and
! ering, early invoice payment discounts, and subs! tu! on
of high cost resources with alterna! ve talent pools. Each
of these factors by itself has the poten! al to give a 10%
saving on the overall spend.
Such high returns on investment (ROIs) through hard
savings o$ en preclude the necessity for iden! fying the
so$ er benefi ts. Another reason for limited emphasis on
es! ma! ng the poten! al so$ savings is the obvious
challenge associated with its quan! fi ca! on. In this
paper we intend to present you with a simple and eff ec! ve
framework that helps you calculate the actual savings
associated with each element of the overall MSP/VMS
program.
Depending on how one looks at it, So$ Savings come in many forms. Following is a comprehensive list in the context of
VMS/MSP implementa! ons:
Effi ciency gains generated by eff ec! ve resource u! liza! on (HR, Procurement, Finance and IT
personnel). Time is saved due to defi ned workfl ows, re-use of requisi! ons, more effi cient and
eff ec! ve on-boarding, and reduc! ons in contractor ‘! me to contribu! on’.
Reduced risk through compliance with regula! ons regarding employee screening and corporate
policies.
Reduced legal liabili! es (worker classifi ca! on, co-employment, compensa! on regula! ons, etc.).
Be* er quality of service to internal stakeholders.
Reduced maverick spend due to approval-driven workfl ows.
Visibility, control and business intelligence readily available to senior management.
Cost avoidance triggered by mistakes – invoice discrepancies etc.
Ability to scale up to any spend level without increasing infrastructure and resources.
Flexibility of workfl ows and integra! on with other systems.
Standardiza! on across units, loca! ons or groups of companies.
Coordina! on through a single point of contact.
Process reengineering, benchmarking and best prac! ces.
Tighter processes for supplier selec! on, contrac! ng and monitoring.
Improvement in the quan! ty and quality of supplier rela! onships.
Workforce performance measurement and training interven! ons.
Ability to procure and manage a more diverse workforce.
High degree of automa! on – from requisi! oning to payment approval.
WHITEPAPERWHITEPAPER
© 2012 DCR Workforce, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DCR Workforce and Smart Track are Registered Trademarks. CCO — 082912
Quantifying Soft Cost Savings
Like an oyster hiding a lustrous pearl inside itself, every so! benefi t hides within itself ‘hard’ benefi ts, the kind that execu# ves
love to hear about. To fi nd the pearls, however, we need to dig deeper and deeper into heart of the so! benefi t.
Step 1: Iden� fy the Nearest Related Tangible Benefi t (NRBT)
Once the so! benefi t is iden# fi ed, ask a simple ques# on: ‘so what?’ With the answer you get, again ask ‘so what?’ Con# nue
the process un# l you arrive at a benefi t that can be quan# fi ed. This is the Nearest Related Tangible Benefi t (NRBT) of a so!
saving. It is similar to the ‘5 Whys’ technique used in root cause analysis.
Volume & Early Payment Discounts
Contract Compliance
Rate Negotiation
Market Rate Monitoring
Bill Rate Management
Statutory LimitManagement
Tenure Management
Conversion Timing
Co-Employment
Alumni Management
Classifi cation Compliance
Regulatory Compliance
SOW Management
Contract Compliance
Supplier Rationaliza-tion and Tiering
Supplier Enrollment
Supplier Manage-ment
Supplier Payment Administration
Auditing
Order Creation and Approval
Candidate Sumittal and Screening
Time Management
Invoice Payment Process
Expense Reinburse-ment Processing
Reporting Process
Quality Process
UNEARTHING THE TANGIBLE ELEMENTS OF SOFT SAVINGSMethod 1
WHITEPAPER
© 2012 DCR Workforce, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DCR Workforce and Smart Track are Registered Trademarks. CCO — 082912
Quantifying Soft Cost Savings
For example, let’s take one of the so! savings that a con" ngent workforce management program off ers, “reduced hiring cycle
" mes”.
What if the cycle " mes are reduced?
Answer: we can onboard a con" ngent worker faster.
So what? He/she can start producing earlier.
So what? We will start ge$ ng the output and associated revenue faster.
Hmmmmmm….revenue: that’s our NRTB.
Step 2: Quan� fy the Cost/Revenue Drivers
What eff ect does absence of this so! saving have? In our example, what will be the cycle " me in ‘days’ without an MSP/
VMS program? How long will it take with MSP/VMS implemented? The diff erence is the savings in days (let’s call this ‘D’).
Con" nuing the example, calculate the revenue per day that a con" ngent worker makes for the company (’RPD’ for revenue per
day). Note that in the case of some other so! saving, the measure may be diff erent.
Mul" plying the savings in days and revenue per day will give you the actual extra revenue earned because of a reduc" on in
cycle " me for one con" ngent hire (Extra revenue per worker hired (‘ERPW’) = diff erence in days mul" plied by revenue per day,
or ERPW = D * RPD).
Mul" ply the extra revenue per worker with the average number of workers hired in year (‘AH’ for averaged hired), and you get
the total revenue earned because of the MSP/VMS program for this par" cular area of savings (TR = AH * ERPW).
Not all so! benefi ts will lend themselves to such an easy analysis as above. A be& er way to analyze such benefi ts is to examine
the chain of actual ‘measures’ that lead to the end benefi t, then quan" fy each step.
Example 1: Benefi ts of Realloca� ng Resources
Faster cycle " mes -> Produc" vity improvement -> Greater number of transac" ons processed per resource -> Fewer resources
needed to complete transac" ons -> Lower opera" ng costs
In this example, when employees entered hours worked directly into the VMS system, the VMS compared hours entered to
work schedule, calculated pay and benefi ts, and forwarded to the appropriate approval manager. Poten" al errors, missing
" mecards, and poten" al budget overruns were fl agged for correc" on by the hiring manager prior to submission to Human
Resources. The Human Resources received error-free, approved " mesheets. When the HR review was complete, the records were
automa" cally forwarded to fi nance and HR reports were automa" cally generated and forwarded to all specifi ed recipients.
Prior to the VMS implementa" on, four payroll administrators would take three days to process the weekly payroll. Using the
VMS system, one payroll administrator completed the weekly payroll run in one day. At an average annual salary of $43,000
per payroll administrator, the company realized a savings of $129,000 in reduced salaries and a produc" vity increase of 40%
(represen" ng $17,200 annually) from the remaining benefi ts administrator who then reallocated 2 days of " me per week to
other tasks.
UNEARTHING THE TANGIBLE ELEMENTS OF SOFT SAVINGS
Method 1 (Continued)
Method 2
WHITEPAPERWHITEPAPER
© 2012 DCR Workforce, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DCR Workforce and Smart Track are Registered Trademarks. CCO — 082912
Quantifying Soft Cost Savings
Example 2: Task Simplifi ca� on
Centralized Informa! on –> Visibility -> Line staff saves ! me previously spent looking for informa! on.
In this example, if there are 10 staff members, each ge# ng paid $50k/year, and each reduces the ! me spent searching for infor-
ma! on by 25%, there is a saving poten! al of $125k per year through the indexed search feature in a VMS.
In addi! on to these methods, consider alterna! ve strategies to uncover the true value realized by your MSP/VMS program.
Benchmark your program. Before your MSP/VMS program becomes opera! onal, isolate and measure a cost element over
a specifi ed period of ! me. Then, compare those results to general industry results as reported by a reputable industry analyst.
Conduct a pilot. Automate a single process, measuring the benefi t over a specifi ed period of ! me. Either run a parallel
process for that ! me period, or use the date gathered prior to the VMS ‘Go Live’ for comparison. For accurate results, be sure
you can control any other factors that might aff ect the outcome.
Benchmarking is par! cularly eff ec! ve when a' emp! ng to measure savings achieved through regulatory and policy compliance.
Classifying an individual as an independent contractor decreases an employer’s payroll costs by 15 to 30%. However, Federal
laws state that employers that knowingly misclassify their employees face penal! es in the amount of $50 to $1,000 per day per
misclassifi ed worker. In addi! on, the employer will be held liable for unemployment taxes for that worker.
A large manufacturer was employing 600 light industrial workers who were classifi ed as independent contractors. A( er im-
plemen! ng a consistent worker classifi ca! on process, creden! aling system and audit capability, the MSP demonstrated to the
company that 320 of these workers had been misclassifi ed. Poten! al exposure had the manufacturer been audited by the IRS
and the look-back period had been 90 days?
Federal Fine: $100/day x 90 days x 320 workers = $2,880,000
Back Taxes: $96/day x 90 days x 20% tax rate x 320 workers = $552,960
Total Exposure: $3,432,960
UNEARTHING THE TANGIBLE ELEMENTS OF SOFT SAVINGS
Method 2 (Continued)
Other Methods
WHITEPAPERWHITEPAPER
© 2012 DCR Workforce, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DCR Workforce and Smart Track are Registered Trademarks. CCO — 082912
Quantifying Soft Cost Savings
So! savings usually fall into one of the following categories:
Effi ciency gains achieved through process improvements, produc# vity improvements and lower opera# ng costs
Increased visibility and control, leading to faster and be$ er decisions
Cost avoidance through risk mi# ga# on
Stronger rela# onships and be$ er quality of service, leading to program expansion and renewal
Like a magician conjures up a rabbit from a hat, you can surprise your management by bringing out the harder side of so! ben-
efi ts by adop# ng one or more of the suggested methods.
Conclusion
WHITEPAPERWHITEPAPER
Smart Track Vendor Management So� ware
Smart Track, DCR’s innova� ve Cloud-based suite of workforce supply chain management applica� ons, redefi nes the role of
vendor management systems – expanding from conduc� ng transac� ons to suppor� ng cri� cal interac� ons and decision-mak-
ing. Through Smart Track, we forge networks of business managers, suppliers and indirect workers, crea� ng an ins� tu� onal
memory of best prac� ces, and a means of sharing them.
• Unlimited Visibility into Workforce Lifecycles
• Forecas� ng Tools and Wizards
• “On demand” Reconfi gura� on Capabili� es
• Advanced Compliance Support
• Automated Administra� ve Processing
• Device-Independent Access
• Pre-built Connectors
• Robust Management Repor� ng
• Embedded Business Analy� cs
• Highly Reliable, Scalable, Cloud Compu� ng Pla� orm
• “Always On” Technical Support
About Us
DCR Workforce is, quite simply, dedicated to helping you maximize the contribu� on of your extended workforce. For DCR,
achieving highly effi cient workforce procurement and management transac� ons is just the star� ng point. We also provide
the knowledge and technology required to analyze, understand and act on all aspects of your con� ngent talent management
program.
We serve global F1000 and mid-� er clientele. Representa� ve clients include Lockheed Mar� n, Program Controls, Savi Tech-
nologies, Meads Interna� onal, and Raytheon Javelin Joint Venture. Our proprietary cloud-compu� ng pla� orm (Smart Track)
assists in providing customizable VMS and MSP solu� ons to manage, procure and analyze your talent with complete trans-
parency, real-� me control, high performance and decision-enabling business intelligence.
For more informa� on call +1-888-DCR-4VMS or visit www.dcrworkforce.com
7815 NW Beacon Square Blvd. #224
Boca Raton, FL 33487
Phone: 561 998 3737
www.dcrworkforce.com | blog.dcrworkforce.com
facebook.com/DCRWorkforce linkedin.com/company/dcr-workforce twi" er.com/DCRWorkforce
© 2012 DCR Workforce, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DCR Workforce and Smart Track are Registered Trademarks. CCO — 082912
f lin tw
ABOUT DCR