software patent litigation: what have we learned? lisa 2015

58
Software Patent Litigation: What have we learned? Deb Nicholson Open Invention Network LISA, November 11th, 2015

Upload: freedeb

Post on 12-Apr-2017

564 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Software Patent Litigation:What have we learned?

Deb NicholsonOpen Invention NetworkLISA, November 11th, 2015

Page 2: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

I am not a lawyer.

Page 3: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

This is not legal advice.

Page 4: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Big Picture

Page 5: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

300,000 patents were granted in the US

in the last year

Page 6: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

99 problems, but an invention ain't one

Page 7: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

U.S. Utility Patents Issued Over Time, courtesy of www.patentfreedom.com

Page 8: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

About 50% percent of those were given to inventors

outside the US

Page 9: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Global Trends

Page 10: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Software Patents Issued To Date

US: 799,050

Australia: 53,278

European Patent Office: 108,977

China: 9,860

Korea: 2,362

Canada: 2,109

Japan: 1,993

Great Britain: 672

Germany: 606

From lens.org, on Jan. 30th, 2015

Page 11: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Source: Stefania Fusco, Markets and Patent Enforcement: A ComparativeInvestigation of Non-Practicing Entities in the United States and Europe,

20 M ICH . T ELECOMM . & T ECH . L. R EV . 439 (2014)

Trolls are bringing 11% of UK suits

Page 12: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015
Page 13: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Foreign inventors are very successful in the US courts

Page 14: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015
Page 15: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Barristers & Bottomfeeders

Page 16: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015
Page 17: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

65% of litigated NPE suits have

software-related claims

"An Empirical Study of Patent Litigation Timing: Could A Patent Term Reduction Decimate Trolls Without Harming Innovators?" Brian J. Love, 2012

Page 18: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Contingent fee representation is on the rise

Page 19: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015
Page 20: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

The economy even affects lawyers

Page 21: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

“Even with a 40% contingent share, we need at least $5

million in damages to break even.”

The Rise of Contingent Fee Legislation, David L. Schwarz (2012)

Page 22: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Many firms go after weaker defendants first

Page 23: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Smaller firms go with quantity over quality

Page 24: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015
Page 25: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Even if you win, getting sued sucks

Page 26: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Judges & Juries

Page 27: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

"Understanding the realities of Modern Patent Litigation" (2014 : Allison, Lemley & Schwartz)

In the 90's defendants needed to find prior art or prove that their work was out of scope

Page 28: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Nautilus v. Biosig ruling: vague patents aren't enforceable

Page 29: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Alice v. CLS Bank ruling: generic computer implementation

isn't patentable

Page 30: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

"The Supreme Court recently reaffirmed that fundamental concepts, by

themselves, are ineligible abstract ideas."

Federal Circuit, Digitech Image v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc.

Page 31: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

McRO v. Activision: “This case illustrates the danger that exists when the novel portions of an invention are claimed too broadly.”

Judge Wu

Page 32: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

More experience with patent suits makes judges less likely

to rule for patent-holders

Does Familiarity Breed Contempt Among Judges Deciding Patent Cases?, Mark A. Lemley, Su Li, and Jennifer M. Urban, 2013

Page 33: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Jasper L. Tran, Software Patents: A One-Year Review of Alice v. CLS Bank, 97

Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 532, 540 (2015)

Page 34: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Four out of five software patents could be bogus?

Page 35: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015
Page 36: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Juries are another story...

Page 37: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015
Page 38: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Judges tend to rule for the patentee only half the time

Page 39: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Juries rule for the patentee over two-thirds of the time

Page 40: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Today over 70% of patent cases are heard by juries

Page 41: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

It used to be closer to 5%

Page 42: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

What's working and what isn't

Page 43: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Germany, New Zealand and India have put strict limits on

patentability

Page 44: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Courtesy of patentprogress.org

States Acting Against Bad Faith Patent

Infringement Assertions (as of 09/16/2015)

Page 45: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Sometimes democracy works!

Page 46: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

And sometimes it's a little trickier...

Page 47: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

From the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

" ...each Party shall make patents available for any invention, whether a product or process, in all fields of technology, provided that the invention is new, involves an inventive step and is capable of industrial application."

Page 48: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

The Open Invention Network: 1800+ FLOSS companies

and projects that don't sue each other

Page 49: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

We also coordinate defensive publishing

Page 50: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Homework

Page 51: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Patent-busting siteshttp://linuxdefenders.org/https://trollingeffects.org/

http://patents.stackexchange.com/

Page 52: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Join OIN

Page 53: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015
Page 54: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Pass local laws

Page 55: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015
Page 56: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Further reading The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, http://ur1.ca/o9dwh

The Rise of Contingent Fee Representation in Patent Litigation by David L. Schwartz (2012)

Does Familiarity Breed Contempt Among Judges Deciding Patent Cases?, Mark A. Lemley, Su Li, and Jennifer M. Urban, 2013

Software Patents: A One-Year Review of Alice v. CLS Bank, Jasper L. Tran, 2015

Inter Partes Review: An Early Look at the NumbersBrian J. Love & Shawn Ambwani, 2015

Page 57: Software Patent Litigation: What Have We Learned? LISA 2015

Picture and Font CreditsUS Transparency Legislation, courtesy of www.patentprogress.org

U.S. Utility Patents Issued Over Time & Operating Company Parties in NPE Lawsuits Over Time, courtesy of www.patentfreedom.com

The courts' implementation of Alice: Jasper L. Tran, Software Patents: A One-Year Review of Alice v. CLS Bank, 97 Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office

Society 532, 540 (2015)

CC.BYBlackboard by J. Neuber – Butterfly on Bed by Maxintosh – Ambulance In Motion

by Benjamin Ellis – Chalk Flag by Eric Herman – Emptied Piggy Bank by Eden, Janine and Jim – Chalk Maze by Eli Christman – Chalkzilla by Alexander Affleck – Chalk

Rainbow by Christopher Schmidt (all from Flickr)

CC.BY.SAPurple Haze by Joey Gannon (from Flickr)

Fair UseBenedict Cumberbatch as Sherlock doesn't belong to me

Public DomainAmerican Gothic by Grant Wood from the Google Art Project

Fonts: Anke (OFL) & Sorts Mill Goudy (MIT)