soil-plant system response to lime and p fertilizer amendments … · 2020. 10. 12. · the chimbo...
TRANSCRIPT
Soil-Plant System Response to Lime and P Fertilizer Amendments in an Andisol in the Ecuadorean Andes
Kathleen Webbera, Soraya Alvarado Ochoab, Richard Stehouwera, Danny Faríasb
Penn State Universitya, INIAPb
Andisols are soils derived from volcanic ash that make up a mere 1% of the world’s soils. They are geographically localized to regions marked by volcanic activity, including the Andean Highlands of Ecuador, part of the Ring of Fire. Andisols have high organic matter content, high water holding capacity, and high overall native fertility as a result of their unique parent material. However, high rates of phosphorus sorption are also characteristic of many volcanic soils (Andisols) and can limit agronomic productivity. Acid Andisols, like those evaluated in this experiment, experience phosphorus sorption as a result of ligand bonding with amorphous minerals and organic matter, and fixation of phosphate with aluminum and iron oxides. Phosphate removed from the soil solution is strongly held by soil minerals and is not available to plants.
The major objective of our work was to investigate the use of lime and P fertilizer amendments in order to reduce P sorption, increase P bioavailability, and increase plant P uptake and biomass production.
Here we report on the immediate results of this work and potential long-term benefits of application of these amendments to acid Andisols that have high rates of P sorption.
Introduction & Objectives
General properties of a soil within the watershed of the Chimbo River within the SANREM study site in Ecuador was selected to be used in a greenhouse experiment:
Nine treatments were established in the greenhousestudy using three rates each of lime and phosphorus:
Plant tissue was digested in nitric-perchloric acidsolution while soil samples were analyzed in a Modified Olsen and a Mehlich-3 solution.
Materials & Methods
Results
The use of lime is shown by the plant bioindicators to have a positive effect on biomass production, however, the same treatments were shown to have no effect or a negative impact on available soil phosphorus. This discrepancy highlights the need for future development and calibration of a soil test for this region.
Plant nutrition, including tissue calcium, iron, and others concentrations were all improved for the plant with the use of lime. Plant P concentrations nor uptake changed due to liming.
The use of lime in these volcanic soils to improve the long-term phosphorus availability is a potential theme for future work on this subject. Results from our tests show an improved phosphorus desorbability over time with liming, in addition to the increased P availability directly linked to the addition of P fertilizer.
Conclusions
0x Lime Rate
0P 1P 2P
0P 1P 2P
1x Lime Rate
0P 1P 2P
2x Lime Rate
Measurement Result
pH 5.88
Olsen extractable P 6.32 mg/kg
Aluminum (Mehlich-3) 1707.9 mg/kg
Iron (Olsen) 927.42 mg/kg
Plant Available Water Content 37.2 g H2O/g soil
Organic Matter 13.2%
Texture Silt Loam
Field Rate Applied Rate
Treatment Code Lime P2O5 Lime P2O5
ton ha-1 kg ha-1 g pot-1
T1: 0L, 0P 0 0 0 0
T2: 0L, 1P 0 90 0 0.32
T3: 0L, 2P 0 180 0 0.63
T4: 1L, 0P 3 0 11.74 0
T5: 1L, 1P 3 90 11.74 0.32
T6: 1L, 2P 3 180 11.74 0.63
T7: 2L, 0P 6 0 23.48 0
T8: 2L, 1P 6 90 23.48 0.32
T9: 2L, 2P 6 180 23.48 0.63
Clinopyroxene11.01%
Holmquisite1.50%
Quartz1.70%
Amorphous & Others38.84%
Andesine46.95%
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1 2 3 4 5
Des
orb
ed P
(m
g P
kg-
1 s
oil)
Sequential Extraction Round
Cumulative P Desorption
T1: 0L, 0P
T2: 0L, 2P
T3: 2L, 0P
T4: 2L, 2Pb
ab
ab
a
0
20
40
60
80
100
T1: 0L, 0P T2: 0L, 2P T3: 2L, 0P T4: 2L, 2PDes
orb
ed P
(m
g P
kg
soil-
1)
Treatment Type
Effect of previous lime and P treatment on desorption of subsequently added P
The use of lime in a first cropping cycle was shown to have an impact on the desorbable phosphorus from the same soils after a secondary phosphorus application, suggesting that liming increases future P availability in these soils.
0
4
8
12
16
20
0 1 2
gra
ms p
ot-
1
Lime Rate
Dry Plant Biomass
0X P Rate1X P Rate2X P Rate
Effect Pr>FL <0.05P <0.05LxP 0.33
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0 1 2
gra
ms P
po
t-1
Lime Rate
P Uptake
0X P Rate
1X P Rate
2X P Rate
Effect Pr>FL 0.15P <0.05LxP 0.23
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 2
mg
P k
g-1
Lime Rate
Mehlich-3 Extractable P, Time 4
0X P Rate
1X P Rate
2X P Rate
Effect Pr>FL 0.06P 0.28LxP 0.17
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 2
mg
P k
g-1
Lime Rate
Olsen Extractable P, Time 4
0X P Rate
1X P Rate
2X P Rate
Effect Pr>FL <0.05P <0.05LxP <0.05
Differences in the amount of phosphorus recovered between the two extracting solutions show variability and theimportance of calibration of results with field data, as well as investigation of new methods for measurement.
0
150
300
450
600
750
900
0 1 2
mg
Fe
kg
-1
Lime Rate
Plant Tissue Fe Concentration
0X P Rate
1X P Rate
2X P Rate
Effect Pr>FL <0.05P 0.21LxP 0.78
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
0 1 2
% C
a c
on
ten
t
Lime Rate
Plant Tissue Ca Concentration
0X P Rate
1X P Rate
2X P Rate
Effect Pr>FL <0.05P 0.22LxP 0.43
Plant biomass and calcium and iron tissue concentrations were influenced by liming, as well as other micronutrientconcentrations. P fertilizer increased biomass production and P uptake, but P concentration did not change.
Analysis of soil mineralogy gave the above results. Amorpohousminerals, clinopyroxene, and holmquisite all have high variable charge and high rates of P sorption. Andesine is a very typical
plagioclase feldspar developing in volcanic soils.
5.00
5.20
5.40
5.60
5.80
6.00
6.20
6.40
0 50 100
pH
Days after Liming
Soil pH
0X Lime Rate
1X Lime Rate
2X Lime Rate
Lime did increase soil pH (which then decreased over time).
Differences in barley response to lime and phosphorus application are shown.
Young Andisol profile showing many depositional volcanic ash events.