solar collector1
DESCRIPTION
weeeeeeeeTRANSCRIPT
Elvin Infante
The University of the Sunshine CoastElvin Infante: 1044435
Solar Collectors
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction.................................................................................................................1
2 Aim..............................................................................................................................1
3 Theory..........................................................................................................................1
3.1 General.............................................................................................................................1
3.2 Solar Collector Design........................................................................................................2
4 Method........................................................................................................................3
5 Results and Discussion.................................................................................................4
5.1 Discussion of Results.........................................................................................................4
5.2 Possible Improvements.....................................................................................................6
5.2.1 Overall Experiment............................................................................................................6
5.2.2 Solar Collector....................................................................................................................6
6 Conclusion....................................................................................................................7
Appendix A........................................................................................................................8
Appendix B ...................................................................................................................9
1 INTRODUCTION
Over time there has been an increasing interest in renewable energy sources with much if this interest spurred
by the need for our society to move past fossil fuels and look to other sources that will help to achieve a more
sustainable way of life. One of these sources is solar energy. Solar collectors transform solar radiation from the
sun into heat energy of which is transferred to medium and converted to useable energy to be applied to any
number of everyday things. This report will discuss the results obtained from an experiment, which entails a
solar collector heating a piece of copper and will aim to relate the results to the fundamentals behind solar
radiation conversion.
2 AIM
The aim of this practical is to determine the heating characteristics of a dish type solar collector using a piece
of copper as the absorber. The experiment will focus on the maximum temperature and the power output as a
function of temperature to demonstrate the theories that have been learnt.
3 THEORY
3.1 General
In an ideal situation, it should be observed that at some point in time during the experiment, a balance
between the rate at which energy from the sun is absorbed by the copper, the rate at which the copper heats
up and the rate at which heat is radiated from the copper to the surrounding environment will be achieved.
This balance signifies that the system is working at its maximum efficiency where by the copper is being heated
effectively by the system. This scenario is expressed in the following equation:
As the system moves beyond this point, the overall efficiency should decrease and as a result the amount and
rate of change in temperature. As time elapses and the setup reaches its maximum temperature, it should be
apparent that the power absorbed by the copper equals that of the power emitted by the solar collector as the
temperature has plateaued thus indicating that no further heating is experienced by the copper.
1
3.2 Solar Collector Design
In order to meet the specifications of this experiment, a dish type solar collector design was adopted. The dish
type solar collector is, as the name states, a disk that reflects the incoming energy to one point – its focal
point. Optimizing the design so that the focal point is focused on the absorber is key to reducing the amount of
wasted energy. Another crucial factor is the overall construction of the system, as a poorly constructed system
may result in the energy being reflected away from the absorber, thus it is critical that the curve of the dish is
smooth and is stays true to its intended parabolic shape. Figure 1 below shows the way in which a dish type
collector works, with Figure 2 showing the actual collector that was used.
Figure 1 - Typical Dish Type Solar Collector
Figure 2 - Solar Collector Used for Practical
2
4 METHOD
The following points describe the procedure that was undertaken to achieve the goals of the experiment.
1. The focal point was determined by the use of a piece of paper that was held above the centre of the
dish and moved up and down. This indicated the size of the area of focus thus the optimal position to
position the piece of copper.
2. The piece of copper was mounted into position.
3. An ambient temperature reading was recorded in the shade prior to attaching the thermocouple to
the mounted piece of copper, making sure that it was in contact with the copper.
4. The solar collector was positioned in a central position beneath the heating lamp.
5. The heating lamp and timer were started instantaneously with temperature readings being recorded
at 15-second intervals.
6. The data was compiled and placed into tables of which were used to form graphs of the resulting data
and calculations.
There were two graphs formed of which included a ‘Temperature vs Time’ and ‘Efficiency (η) vs Temperature’.
In order to achieve efficiency PHEATING was first determined using the following equation:
(Eq.1)
where:
PHEATING is the heating power being experienced by the copper
m is the mass of the copper
c is the specific heat of the copper
dTdt is the instantaneous rate of change of temperature over time
This equation was then used to determine the solar collectors efficiency throughout the heating process with
the use of the following efficiency equation:
(Eq.2)
3
where:
η is the efficiency at any point during the heating process
α is the heating coefficient
I is the intensity of the source
ACOLL is the cross sectional area of the piece of metal
In order to determine the gradients to the curve formed from plotting Temperature over Time, calculus was
used. Firstly an expression for the curve was derived using Microsoft Excel, following this the derivative to the
curve was solved and ‘x’ values were substituted which outputted the gradient of the curve for that value of
‘x’.
5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
5.1 Discussion of Results
This section discusses the results that were obtained as a result of conducting the experiment and delves into
the meanings of these outcomes and any unexpected occurrences. Table 1 below shows the variables used
through the practical.
Table 1 - List of Variables
Variables Used
Mass (m) 0.0112kg
Specific Heat – Copper (c) 386J/kg C °
Absorption Coefficient (α ) 0.95
Reflectivity (r) 0.9
Intensity (I) 800 W/m2
Area – Collector (A) 0.45m2
4
Table 2 below summarises the results achieved from the experiment.
Table 2 - Summary of Results
Temperature
(C ° )
Gradient Change in Gradient P-Heating
(W)
Efficiency
27 0.526 2.2845 0.0071
47.6 0.473 -0.053 2.0543 0.0063
61.1 0.423 -0.05 1.8370 0.0057
73.1 0.376 -0.047 1.6330 0.0050
83.7 0.331 -0.045 1.4376 0.0044
93.0 0.289 -0.042 1.2552 0.0039
101.1 0.25 -0.039 1.0858 0.0034
118.8 0.149 -0.101 0.6471 0.0020
128.6 0.072 -0.077 0.3127 0.0001
132.6 0.019 -0.053 0.0825 0.0001
Overall the solar collector performed quite well as it met the brief due to its ability to focus the energy that
was emitted from the source to the copper and was able to raise the copper’s temperature as is clearly evident
in both Table 2 and Figure 4. Observing the gradients over the heating period in both Table 2 and the curve
characteristics of Figure 4, it can be said that the temperature increase experienced by the copper was at a
much greater rate at the beginning of the testing than that of the tale end. This result is consistent with the
previously mentioned theory as it is clearly evident that as the setup reaches its maximum temperature the
heating power decreases. This is also demonstrated in the incremental changes in the raw temperature data
shown in Appendix A, as the changes are quite significant up until 133° with jumps of 4° - 21°with the larger
changes at the beginning. These changes decrease after this point with the data showing a steading
temperature increase of 1° - 2° until a maximum temperature is reached signified by the data showing a
consistent reading of 158° . This lack of change is a major indicator that there is an absence of PHEATING thus
further satisfying the theory initially stated.
It is also apparent that the PHEATING value never reaches levels close to that of the source (800 W/m2). Though
there have been a number of assumptions adopted during this experiment that could explain this, this lack of
reflected power can also be attributed to the solar collector itself. The most prominent issue that was
observed was the focus area of the solar collector’s focal point. When tested the focal area was much larger
than that of the copper thus leading to believe that a portion of the power reflected from the source missed
the copper completely. This effect was increased as time elapsed as the solar collector began to deform due to
the temperatures with the aluminum foil wrinkling, the cardboard bending and the glue bonds breaking. This
change in structure and shape meant that the power from the source was now being reflected away from the
copper thus reducing the solar collector’s effectiveness.
5
Another aspect worth highlighting is the
efficiency readings that are
displayed in Appendix B. The trend of efficiency that was obtain did not meet expectations as it was expected
that the efficiency would begin at a low level with an increase experienced of which would reach a peak, then
fall to a lower level. This behavior should be been expressed through a curved similar to that of a negative
parabola with the peak indicating the systems maximum efficiency or a balance between the power absorbed
and the heating power with the power emitted. When referring to the results expressed in Figure 5 in
Appendix B, it may be assumed that the data is indicating that the system began at temperatures beyond its
efficiency thus the resultant curve was achieved.
5.2 Possible Improvements
This section discusses the possible improvements that may have been implemented to improve certain aspects
of the experiment.
5.2.1 Overall Experiment
The most pressing improvement would be to have the experiment conducted outside on an optimal day with
no cloud cover and limited breeze. This was unattainable at the time that this experiment was conducted due
to the nature of the weather. Conducting the experiment in these conditions would provide more accurate
results. In addition to this, access to results achieved by other designs could also be helpful as it provides
further insight to the advantages and disadvantages of build quality and design.
5.2.2 Solar Collector
It is believed that the most influential change that could be made to the solar collector that was used for this
experiment was the material that was used both for its construction and for the reflective component.
Improved construction materials would reduce the deformation of the structure, thus reducing the amount of
power being reflected away from the copper. Improved reflective material has the potential to increase the
system’s operating capacity thus also increasing the system’s efficiency.
Figure 3 – Deformation of Panels and Aluminium Lining
6
6 CONCLUSION
The solar collector that was constructed for the purpose of demonstrating the theory behind simple solar
collection performed adequately and was able to produce results that met expectations on the most part with
the system able to achieve a maximum temperature of 158 C° over a 12.5min period, achieving a maximum
efficiency of 0.007. The results displayed the relationship between the power absorbed, heating power
experienced and the power emitted by the piece of copper and successfully showed that as the system
reached its maximum temperature, the heating power experienced by the copper was less apparent.
Improvements to both the experiment; by using the sun as the source and the solar collector; with
improvements to the materials used could have attain better results. With this said, the overall experiment
was enough to allow for the understanding of underlying components relating to solar collection.
7
APPENDIX A
Table 3 – Raw Data Collected from Practical
Raw Data
Temperature (degrees)
Time (seconds)
27 0
48 30
62 60
74 90
86 120
95 150
103 180
110 210
115 240
120 270
125 300
129 330
133 360
135 390
137 420
139 450
141 480
143 510
145 540
147 570
149 600
151 630
153 660
155 690
157 720
158 750
158 780
8
APPENDIX B
Figure 4 – Temperature over Time Graph
9
Figure 5 – Efficiency Over Temperature Graph
10