soln exp-1 by khurram hashmi

Upload: khurram-hashmi

Post on 05-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Soln Exp-1 by Khurram Hashmi

    1/10

    CONTROL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING

    LAB ASSIGNMENT

    EXPERIMENT-1

    Submitted by

    Khurram Hashmi

    F08-H

    0660

    To

    Engr. Majid Gulzar

    12/27/2011

  • 7/31/2019 Soln Exp-1 by Khurram Hashmi

    2/10

    CHAPTER4 Experiment1

    Q1

    As the pole moves farther away on real axis . system achieves stability sooner. Thus , nearing

    required stable response for farther off poles in a first order system

    Q2.(a)

    a=4 b=25

    Tp 0.69

    Ts 2.00%O.S. 25.38

    Tr 0.293

  • 7/31/2019 Soln Exp-1 by Khurram Hashmi

    3/10

    Q2(b)

    For doubling real part and maintaining imaginary constant

    a=8 b=37

    Tp 0.69sec

    Ts 1.00sec

    %O.S. 6.44

    Tr 0.33sec

    A reduction in peak amplitude, %age overshoot and settling time while real part is doubled

    Q2(c)

    For halving real part while maintain imaginary constant

    a=2 b=22

    Tp 0.69secTs 4.00sec

    %O.S. 50.38

    Tr 0.26sec

    With real part halved, system rises quickly to peak value with greater %age overshoot and

    settles later on than before

  • 7/31/2019 Soln Exp-1 by Khurram Hashmi

    4/10

    Q3(a)

    For maintain the real part and doubling the imaginary part

    a=4 b=88

    Tp 0.34

    Ts 2.00

    %O.S. 50.38

    Tr 0.13

    Imaginary part of roots doubled, system rises quicker to peak value with greater % age

    overshoot and increased settling time

    Q3(b)

    For maintain the real part and quadrupling the imaginary part

    a=4 b=339.6Tp 0.17

    Ts 2.00

    %O.S. 70.97

    Tr 0.06

    Imaginary part of roots quadrupled, system rises even quicker to peak value with much

    greater % age overshoot and increased settling time with much oscillation

    Poles farther off on imaginary axis

  • 7/31/2019 Soln Exp-1 by Khurram Hashmi

    5/10

    Q4 (a)

    Maintaining damping ratio while doubling natural frequency

    a=8 b=100

    Tp 0.34

    Ts 1.00

    %O.S. 25.38Tr 0.147

    Q4(b)

    Maintaining damping ratio while quadrupling natural frequency

    a=16 b=400

    Tp 0.17

    Ts 0.50%O.S. 25.38

    Tr 0.07

    With increase in natural frequency, Rise time and settling time decreases but peak value

    remains the same (1.25). Overall step response graph form is similar in both cases

  • 7/31/2019 Soln Exp-1 by Khurram Hashmi

    6/10

    Q5

    The real part of the roots contributes to system stability and damping whereas theimaginary part yields instability, overshoot and oscillations. Overall system response

    is determined by the %age of both in the root.

    A greater real part in the roots means system sees less oscillations and settles quickly A greater imaginary part means system rises quickly to peak value, has less damping

    i.e. more oscillations and a greater settling time

    CHAPTER4 EXPERIMENT-2Q1(a). same as Q2(a)

    Q1 (b). & (c).

    Farther away the additional pole is on ve real axis, greater system resemblance to original

    system. (F)

    Transient response is more affected by poles nearer to origin than those farther away

  • 7/31/2019 Soln Exp-1 by Khurram Hashmi

    7/10

    Q2.

    As the zero moves farther off on theve real axis. System response increases in magnitude

    not varying greatly in form from original.

  • 7/31/2019 Soln Exp-1 by Khurram Hashmi

    8/10

    Q3.

    When a=3 and b=4 system E has closest position to pure 2nd

    order system when b is being

    ignored so b=4 will affect the response lesser

    Q4.

    When a=30 and b=40 system E has closest position to pure 2nd

    order system when b is being

    ignored so b=40 will affect the response lesser

  • 7/31/2019 Soln Exp-1 by Khurram Hashmi

    9/10

    CHAPTER6 Experiment1

    Q1.

    T(s)=

    Q2. K=-1, -2 for overdamped

    Q3. K=1, 2 for Underdamped

    Q4. K=0 for Critically damped

    K=4 for marginally stable

  • 7/31/2019 Soln Exp-1 by Khurram Hashmi

    10/10

    CHAPTER7 Experiment11. What system types will yield zero steady-state error for step inputs?

    Type 1 and Type2 Systems

    2. What system types will yield zero steady-state error for ramp inputs?Type 2 systems

    3. What system types will yield infinite steady-state error for ramp inputs?

    Type 0 systems

    3. What system types will yield zero steady-state error for parabolic inputs?(?)

    5. What system types will yield infinite steady-state error for parabolic inputs?Type zero and type1 systems