solon the lawgiver in the light of recent discoveries and criticism
TRANSCRIPT
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 1/96
Loyola University Chicago
Loyola eCommons
Master's Teses Teses and Dissertations
1936
Solon, the Lawgiver, in the Light of RecentDiscoveries and Criticism
Charles A. Castellano Loyola University Chicago
Tis Tesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Teses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in
Master's Teses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please [email protected].
Tis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Aribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Copyright © 1936 Charles A. Castellano
Recommended CitationCastellano, Charles A., "Solon, the Lawgiver, in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism" (1936). Master's Teses. Paper 97.hp://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/97
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 2/96
SOLON, THE LAWGIVER,
IN THE IliGHr
OF RECENT DISCOVERIES
AND CRITICISM.
CHARLES A. CASTELLANO, S. J.
July 1936
A thesis submitted in par t ia l fulfillment ot
the requirements for the degree ot Master ot
Arts in Loyola University.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 3/96
Chapter
Chapter I
Chapter IIChapter III
Chapter IV
Chapter V
TABLE ~ CONTENTS.
Title
Introduction and Background
The Hektemoroi
Cancellation of Debts and Changein the Monetary Standard
Poli t ical Reforms
Miscellaneous Laws andConcluding Remarks.
B1b11ograpey • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • •
Page
4-25-42
-60-83
-2 -
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 4/96
Vita Auctoris
Charles Anthony Castellano, s. J. vms born in New
York City, New York, June 11, 1907. He moved to New-
port , Rhode Island, where he attended St. Joseph's
Grammar and High School. He entered the University
of Detroit in 1923 and Milford Novitiate of the So-
ciety of Jesus in 1926. He received his Lit t . B.
from Xavier University, Cincinnati , in 1930; studied
at the Gregorian University in Rome and St. Louis
University, St. Louis from 1931 to 1934; taught a t
John Carroll Universi ty, Cleveland, from 1935 to
1936. He t ransferred from St. Louis University to
Loyola University in the ffrnmmer of 1935.
-3 -
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 5/96
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION and BACKGROUND
-4-
That Solon was one of the t ruly great figures in Athe
nian history and that he deserves mention in every history
of democratic development no one denies. vVhy he merits
this twofold dis t inct ion is something upon which no two
authors are in complete agreement. Antiquity has, com-
paratively speaking, bequeathed us an abundance of ma-
t e r ia l but , unfortunately, antiquity does not always a
gree with i t se l f . Ancient authors question one another
and the science of archeology challenges the words of
ancient authors.
'£his thesis does not have the effrontery of claim
ing to se t t le so venerable a controversy. I ts purpose
is to endeavour to revaluate the great variety of s ta te-
ments, to trace modern changes in opinion ( i . e . those
occasioned by a more thorough study of the recent dis
covery of the Consti tut ion of Athens), to assemble and
contrast the opinions of prominent histor ians. The re
su l t , it is hoped, wil l be a fa i r ly complete summary
both of what Solon actual ly did and of what men think
he did.
So much has been writ ten, so many suggestions have
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 6/96
been ventured on the matter under discussion tha t lengthy
preliminary remarks would only needlessly enlarge an a l
ready sizeable subject. I t seems much more sat isfactory
to attack direct ly the problem at hand.
-5 -
The main purpose of th is introductory chapter is to
present in outline the economic and pol i t ica l background
which i s of paramount importance to any understanding of
the measures to which Solon gives his name. In addition
i t wil l be necessary to do some defining of terms which
wil l occur frequently in the course of the thesis and
to cal l at tent ion to a fundamental principle that , i f
borne in mind, wil l help to a more balanced judgment of
the value to us of Solon's reforms. Final ly, we sha l l
pointout and discuss brief ly the main sources we
possess for his l i fe and actions.
uGeographically Attica was a backwater of Greek
l i fe lying off the main l ines of comnru.nication. 11 (1) Ap-
plied to the period of the micration of nations and for
several centuries af te r , th is statement i s in every way
accurate. I ts importance, moreover, cannot be minimized.
The geographic posit ion of Attica combined with the bare
ness of i t s so i l was destined to affect in no ~ a a l l de
gree i t s socia l , pol i t ica l and economic l i f e . "Hence,
the migratory passages which aggitated the whole of Hel-
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 7/96
las l e f t Attica untouched, and for this reason Attic his
tory i s not divided into such marked epochs as tha t of
Peloponnesus; it possesses a superior unity, and presents
an uninterrupted development of conditions of l i fe native
in the i r origin to the land." (2)
Someone has writ ten an entire volume on the influ
ence of geography on history. I f ever such an influence
was demonstrated, i t was demonstrated in Attica. The
soi l was too poor to grow wheat in any quanti ty. Of the
staple foods barley alone could thrive and this only in a
moderate degree. Throughout a l l Athenian history there
stalked the spectre of the grain problem. Even when
Athens was at the height of her power, her statesmen
were ever harassed by the necessity of providing grain
for the population. In a country not especially noted
for the severi ty of i t s judicial penal t ies , to t r i f l e
even with the price of grain ~ e a n t death.
We shal l see how it was rather the aridi ty of the
soi l than the excessively srasping policy of the land
owners, harsh though they were, tha t forced l ibera l iz ing
policies on the nobles and ave the f i r s t impetus to demo-
cracy. For we must remember that in the period we are
t reat ing Attica was not suffer inz acutely from over-popu
la t ion. That Athens should turn to commerce was inevit-
-6 -
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 8/96
able; i t was ei ther that or national stagnation. Solon
deserves special credi t because he was the f i r s t to erasp
the s i tuat ion and apply the remedies. Unable to grow her
ovm food, Athens had to produce merchandise to exchange
for food. But even th is was not suff ic ient . She had to
guarantee for herself the possibi l i ty of exchange; she
-7 -
had to keep open the l ines of communication. Hence,
Athens was l i t e ra l ly forced out to sea. That she became
supreme in the Aegean may be par t ia l ly due to other causes;
that she became a great sea power was inavoidable. I t had
to be that or subjection to that nation which would give
her food.
But a land governed and controlled by lando\vners
cannot turn to commerce without profound pol i t i ca l changes.
Commerce breeds a new power in the s ta te . I t creates the
great class of m o d e r a t e ~ y wealthy men of business. Sooner
or l a te r this group wil l become conscious of i t s sterngth
and wil l refuse to play second fiddle to ar is tocrats by
bi r th . I t will demand civic privileges and the r ight of
.making i t s words fe l t in the management of the s ta te .
Solon's vision in this regard, even i f he had no other
t i t l e to fame, would be suff icient to stamp him as a man of
genius. I t is true that he l e f t the main burden of govern-
ment exactly where he found i t , on the shoulders of the
aristocracy by bir th. Yet, by a t ruly extraordinary miracle
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 9/96
of moderation, he opened the door to the man of commerce.
The miracle of i t was tha t the door he opened was a small
door which at the time may have appeared an almost in
s ignif icant entrance. Yet, we sha l l see how i t contained
within i t s e l f the power to widen and enlarge so as to
pass the throng that was to besiege i t . Athens, owing
to Solon's foresight , achieved democracy with the very
minimum of bloodshed. This alone would ent i t l e her to
-8 -
a uniqueness amid a l l the democracies in history.
Thus far we have viewed Attica in the large. Much
of what has been said would, for the most par t , apply
equally well to any nation with her geographical back
ground. Let us turn now to specif ic problems which con
fronted Solon when in 594 B.C. (3) a suffer ing populace
and a fear fu l governing class bestowed on him the t i t l e
of archon and granted him almost l imi t less powers to re
medy the i l l s of s ta te . Fi r s t , l e t us allow the original
sources to speak for themselves.
Plutarch in hs l i f e of Solon paints the following
picture: 11The Athenians ••••• fe l l to the i r old quarrels
about the zovernment, there being as many different
par t ies as there were divers i t i es in the country. (4)
The Hil l quarter favored democracy, the Plain oligarchy,
and those that l ived by the sea-side stood fo r a mixed
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 10/96
-9 -
form of government, and so hindered ei ther of the other par-
t ies from prevail ing. The dispari ty of fortune between the
r ich and the poor, also reached i t s height a t tha t time; so
that the ci ty seemed to be in a t ru ly dangerous condition;
with no other means but despotism able to free it from dis-
turbances and se t t le i t . All the people were indebted to
the r ich; and ei ther they t i l l ed thei r land for the i r cre-
di tors , paying them a sixth par t of the increase, and were,
therefore, called Hectemorii and Thetas, or they engaged
their body for the debt, and might be seized and ei ther
sent into slavery a t home, or sold to strangers . Some (for
no law forbade i t ) were forced to se l l thei r children or
f ly the country to avoid the cruel t ies of the i r creditors;
but the most part and the bravest of them began to combine
together and encourage one another to stand to it, to
choose a leader , to l iberate the condemned debtors, divide
the land and change the government." (5)
Aristot le in his Constitution of Athens gives the fol-
lowing description: "But as has been said before, the persons
of the people were mortgaged to the i r credi tors , and the land
was in the hands of the few. Now, seeing that such was the
organization of the const i tut ion, and that many were in
slavery to the few, the people rose against the upper class.
The s tr i fe was keen, and for a long time the two part ies were
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 11/96
-10-
face to face with one another till a t l a s t , by common con
sent , they appointed Solon to be mediator and Archon (6)
and committed the whole consti tut ion to h is handsf the
imnediate cause of his appointment was his poem (7) , which
begins with the words,--
I see, and within my hear t deep sadness has claimedi t s place
As I look on the oldest home of the ancient Ionianrace: (8)
and so he continues, f ighting and disputing on behalf of
each ·party in turn against the other, and f inal ly he ad-
vises them to come to terms and put an end for the quarrel
exis t ing between them. By bi r th {9) and reputat ion Solon
was one of the foremost men of the day, but in wealth and
posit ion he was of the middle class , as i s manifest from
many circumstances, and especially from his o?m evidence
in these poems, where he exhorts the wealthy not to be
grasping.
But ye who have s tore of goodwho are sated and overflow
Restrain your swelling soul ,and s t i l l i t and keep it low;
Let the hear t tha t is great within yoube t ra ined in a lowlier way;
Ye shal l not have a l l at your wil l ,and we wil l not forever obey.
Indeed, he constantly ascribes the origin of the confl ict
to the r ich; and accordingly a t the beginning of the poem
he says tha t he fears "the love of wealth and an overween
ing mind," evidently meaning that i t was through these
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 12/96
-11-tha t the quarrel arose. (10)
Economically, then, the poor were l i t e ra l ly ground
dovrn beneath the heels of the r ich. In every way the out
look must have been gloomier than it is fo r the poor in
the modern s ta te . In our industr ial ized environment, the
poverty-s tr icken worlanan has at l eas t some hope of bet ter -
ment. There i s the perennial expectat ion tha t industry
wil l11pick up", tha t somehow wages wil l advance and t imes
wil l be bet te r . Besides, there is always the ba l lo t ,
which, though it invariably issues in a disappointment,
does nevertheless t inge the future with a ros ier hue. On
the other hand, early sixth century Attica seemed to pro
mise nothing but abject slavery. for the dovmtrodden poor.
The l ibera l at t i tude on the par t of the r ich (for i t
was a l i be ra l at t i tude even to consider a change in the
status quo) and the moderate sp i r i t on the par t of the
poor, whereby both par t ies indicated t he i r will ingness to
hearken to the decision of a mediator, are a definite in
dicat ion, even a t t h i s early date, of tha t admirable senseof balance which was to be one of the outstanding t r a i t s
of Greek civ i l i za t ion . I t was a homage paid by an emo-
t ional people to the rule of reason.
We have already hinted above tha t the lower classes in
Athenian society had no say in the management of the govern
ment. We must now examine t h i s in .::;reater de ta i l , because,
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 13/96
otherwise, the f u l l scope and profound s ign i f icance of
Solon ' s po l i t i c a l reforms w i l l be almost meaninr, less.
Before proceeding f a r t he r , we rrru.st take note o f tvw
poin ts ; f i r s t , there i s general disagreement on the exact
po l i t i c a l arrangement before the t ime of Solon; secondly,
Solon's name became so in t imate ly connected with the l a t e r
Greek democracy t ha t there was a st rong tendency among
l a t e r wri ters to at tr• ibute nru.ch to him which may wel l have
been es tabl i shed by others long before him.
On one point there i s general unanimity o f opinion.
The main power in the s ta te vms concentrated in the hands
of the Archon. I t i s t rue t h a t , speaking s t r i c t l y , t he re
were nine archons, but;, alrer,dy many years be fore Solon 's
-12
t:LY1e, it yras in the o:ffice of the Pres ident Lrchon t ha t the
c}'.ief c i v i l author i ty res ided . Relj_gious author i ty res ted
vdth the King Archon. The 1:1ilita1.y author i ty was in the
hands of t!1e :)ole;:Ia:.c>cll. '.:Phe s ix archons names Thesmothe-
tae had mel.e ly rout ine funct ions. Of these l a t e r Aris to t le
says , "The1
1
hesmothete,e were R.l)90inted nany yenrs o.:fter-
wards, v1hen these of:E'ices ( the t h ree mentioned above) had
ali•eady become armual; and the objec t of t he i r crea t ion
v:2.s -that they might record in v1riting a l l l e ga l decis ions
!01 ·nd '"' c t " · f t ' · · · · t t · ·-d cc_, as z:uaro.lal1S o D.em Wlt:ll. a Vlew o. execl.J"lng JUde;-
ment lPlon t rans ere snors o f the lm7. 11( 11)
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 14/96
-13-
Conrr:1enting on th is early organization Greenidge has
th is to say, "The menbers of the board consti tuted in 683
were cal led off ic ia l ly by the i r specia l t i t l e s , and the
t i t l e11
ArchonH v ~ a s applied s t r ic t l ; r only to the president .
The executive and judgicia l powers of the president must
have been enormous a t a t ime was ":l..thens possessed by an
i l1-ore;anized assembly (probably dependent on the sur:Tinons
of the magist ra te) , no executive counci l l , no v.rritten law
but a few recorded utterances un t i l the time o f })raco,
and no audi t from the popular courts . 11 (12) Aristot le
t e l l s us tha t (luring th is period the members of th is group
of archons were chosen "according to qualif icat ions of
bir th and vreal th .11
( 13) As to the electors of th is body, .
; \ .ristotle s ta tes clear ly t ha t , a t leas t before the time of
Draco, th is function was exercised by the members of the
1.1...reopagus. "Vfuereas in early times the Cou_n.cil of Areo
p a ~ l s surnnoned sui table persons according to i t s own
judgment and appointed them fo r the year to the several
off ices . 11( 14)
Aris to t le in the fourth chapter of h is Constitution
of Athens at t r ibutes to Draco con..stitutional reforms which
have provoked a large amount o f violent discussion. This
would h'lve comparatively l i t t l e in teres t for us here did
i t not in par t involve the question of electors before the
Solonian reforms. Aristot le would have it tha t the Hfran-
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 15/96
chise was given to a l l who could furnish themselves with
a mili tary equipment.11
(15) Kenyon in his Greek edit ion
of the Constitution would accept Aris tot le ' s opinion
wholeheartedly and at t r ibute to Draco the character of a
const i tut ional reformer. Yet, even Kenyon must admit
-14-
tha t such a character of a const i tut ional reformer, is a t
variance with Aris tot le ' s statement in Pol . - - I I , 12 to the
effect that Draco made no change in the const i tut ion.
I,Ioreover, he admits tha t 11i t i s strange that Plutarch, who
certainly was acquainted with Aris tot le ' s work, should have
at t r ibuted the property qual i f lcat ion and the ins t i tu t ion
of the Boule to Solon." (16)
Halliday offered some sugzestions tha t cast serious
doubts on the re l i ab i l i ty of th i s chapter of the Consti
tut ions. He says, "Aris tot le 's Constitution of A t h e ~ sascribes to Draco an attempt to remodel the const i tut ion.
I t i s pret ty generally agreed however, tha t the "Consti
tut ion of Draco" is an invention drawn from the pol i t i ca l
l i tera ture of the end of the f i f th century B.C., when the
pol i t i ca l pamphleteering tended to adopt an his tor ica l
form in order to obtain an his tor ica l sanction for i t s
proposals. No other ancient author gives even a hint that
Draco anticipated Solon in an atempt a t c o ~ s t i t u t i o n a l re
form. The const i tut ion at t r ibuted to him in the Consti-
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 16/96
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~-15-
tution of Athens is inconsistent with Aris tot le ' s s ta te-
ments in the Poli t ics and even in some respects with
statements in the Constitution of Athens i t se l f . I ts
general character i s suspiciously similar to the pol i t ica l
p r o g r a n ~ e advocated a t the end of the f i f th century by the
"moderatesn, who posed as champions of the "consti tut ion
of our fathers11
, and in deta i l there appear to be anachron-
isms. For instance, both the property qualif icat ion and
the fines laid down in the "constitution" are stated in
terms of currency, whereas the laws of Draco are innocent
of money economy and the fines are assessed in cat t le .
Even in Solon's class if icat ion of society property quali-
f icat ions is expressed not in drachmae but in measures of
agricultural produce." (17)
At any ra te , whichever side we take, th is much is be-
yond dispute: the franchise was a rare prerogative a t
Solon's entrance on the pol i t ica l stage. I f we accept the
account of Draco's reforms, we must recognize a t once tha t
a very small number of the generality of the people could
have met his qualif icat ions. Even Kenyon, who i s en-
thusiast ic about the contents of the much-mooted chapter
four, states that "the poorest class , which was probably
also the largest , had not even the 'anagkaiotate dunamis'
which was afterwards assigned to i t by Solon." (18)
I f we reject the val idi ty of Aris tot le ' s statements,
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 17/96
-16-
we have an even glomnier picture . For the process of elec
t ion of Archons by the Areopagus might very easi ly have con
tinued to Solon's tume. This i s the opinion of Grennidge.
"If we decline to recognize the Drachonian const i tut ion
embodied in the Aristotelian t r ea t i se , th is system may have
continued a t the time of Solon." (19) This would mean,
for a l l pract ica l purposes, a closed circ le of pol i t ica l
control , because the Areopagus was lmost cer ta in ly com-
posed of ex-archons, who in turn could so manage affa i rs
that those only be chosen who would be interested in main
taining the existing system. (20) In th is case Solon
would e;et credi t not only by giving the lowest classes a
voice in the government (and th i s everyone admits) but
also for extending the franchise to numberless others who
were previously disqualif ied not by wealth but by bir th .
Throughout th i s paper we are constantly employing
the words consti tut ion and const i tut ional reformer. Con-
sequently, it wil l not be out of place to ca l l at tent ion
to the meaning which the Greeks gave to the word const i
tut ion. We are so accustomed to speak of living !£ a
state and under a consti tut ion that it somewhat disconcert
ing to f ind the Greeks using these two terms synomomously.
Again we have a decided tendency to think of the consti
tut ion as a l iberty-bestowing device, something tha t guaran-
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 18/96
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~-17-
tees our freedom. On the other hand, the Greeks conceived
i t rather as curtai l ing the i r freedom than extending i t .
One way they distinguished themselves from poorly organized
s ta tes was precisely th i s , that Greeks l ived under discip
l ine , whereas the others did not. In other words, while
the consti tution might give them l iber ty , they never forgot
that i t was a principle of order, and, consequently, tha t
even this freedom was to be exercised within the l imits
and under the res tr ic t ions of law.
Greenidge, a very important authority in th is
f ie ld , makes the following remarks on th is point . "With
respect to the f i r s t two terms "state" and "constitution", ,
i t wil l be observed that where we possess two abstract or
semi-abstract terms, the Greeks had only one. This is not
an accidental difference. To us the "state" is an as-
stract ion which should, when used in i t s s t r ic t sense, ex
press the vvhole of the national l i f e , the ' 'constitution"
expressing but a part of i t . To the Greek, the consti tution
(poli teia)is the ci ty i t se l f
(polis) froman
ass tract pointof view; i ts professes, therefore, to express the whole of
the national l i fe . " (21)
In consequence, when we say that Solon changed
the consti tution of the s ta te , we should bear in mind tha t ,
to the Greeks, his innovation involved more than a mere
change in a par t of the national l i fe . He was conceived as
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 19/96
-18-
having changed the whole of the national l i f e . To use Aris
to t le ' s ideas on 1pol i te ia 1 , he had changed the 'form'
(eidos) of the s tate (22), the ' l i f e ' of the s ta te . (23)
Zimmern in his contribution to Livingstone's
"The Legacy of Greece" lays dO\m a caution to be born in
mind when studying Greek pol i t ica l trends. We must always
dist inguish between what is purely national , purely Greek,
from what i s comnon to a l l government. In other words, we
must not attempt to generalize, to lay down a fundamental
principle of eovernment, from some development which was
peculiar to the individual state in which the development
occured. 11 In reading the Greek pol i t i ca l writers, then,
we must be careful to distinguish the universal from the
loca l and ephemeral, element. The l a t te r is indeed of
great in terest and value: but we shal l tend to miss the
really precious and permanent elements in the i r thought
i f we do not take pains to disentangle Thucydides, the i l -
lusioned Athenian patr iot from Thucydides the scient i f ic
histor ian and psychologist, and Plato the ar is tocrat born
out of due season from Plato the unrivalled student of human
nature and of the permanent needs of human society. 11 (24)
In concluding this introductory chapter, I will
be serviceable to indicate the chief primary and secondary
sources of the study undertaken in th is thesis .
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 20/96
· - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~-19-
I . Primary:
The Consti tution of Athens:-
This important document, which was discovered-at
the end of the l a s t century, has thrown much l ight on the
Solonian period and the Solonian reforms. The authorship
of th is work has occasioned much controversy. The ques
t ion i s not so much one of i t s antiquity, for the date of
i t s composition may be determined with considerable ac
curacy, but whether it
wasoriginal ly
writtenby Aristot le
himself or by one of his pupils.
We shal l outline the arguments for and against
Aris tot le ' s authorship. Our source for this information
is the ar t ic le by the Reverend Edward Newburn Walker in
the Encyclopedia Brit tanica.
1 - In general:
Of f i f ty-e ight quotations from
Aristot le ' s work found in grammarians and schol iasts , f i f ty-
five occur in the papyrus.
There i s internal evidence tha t the
t reat ise was composed during the in terval of Aris tot le ' s
second stay in Athens. This stay has been se t between 335
and 322 B.C. The Constitution was written between 329 and
322 B.c.
The date i s l a te r than the Pol i t ics .
2 - Against Aristot le 's authorship:
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 21/96
-20 -
1) The s tyle .
2) Statements contradict those in thePol i t ics .
3) Lack of his tor ical insight and too
easy acceptance of anecdotes.
3 - For h is authorship:
1) All ancient authors re fer the work
to Aristot le .
2) The date of i t s composition coin-
cides with Aristot le ' s second residence in Athens.
3) Similar i ty of thought with passages
in the Poli t ics .
To argument one above the reply is
maae that the Consti tution i s an his tor ica l and popular
work in contrast with the technical Poli t ics .
To argument two above, i t is repl ied
that it was writ ten l a te r and that Aristot le had changed
his views in the meantime.
For Aristot le ' s authorShip are found
Kenyon (editor of the edi t io princeps), Sandys, Wilamomitz,
Blass, Gilbert , Busolt and E. Myer. Grl..llldy refuses to ac
cept the authorship. (25) Greenidge in his monumental
Greek Constitutional History does not comrtit himself. Vrhile
he almost always mentions Aristot le ' s name when referr ing
to the Pol i t ics , he speaks simply of the Consti tution of
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 22/96
,
Athens without naming any author.
Standard his tor ies l ike Grote and Curtius were
written before the discovery of the Constitution; hence,
thei r treatment of certain points regarding Solon must
be compared with the information contained in th is new
document.
Plutarch's Life of Solon:
-21-
I f many of Plutarchs l ives tend to include fables
and legends rather than facts , yet so many of his sta te-
ments only corroborate the assertions of other ancient
authors that i t is safe to oonclude his sources for the
l l fe were exceptionally rel iable and his word in Solon's
regard i s more than usually trustworthy.
Poems of Solon:
A large number of the fragments which bear on our
subject are quoted in the two above works.
Other ancient authors:
Though many other ancient authors make mention of
Solon, very fel.r't have anything to offer the.t is of impor
tance for th is thesis . Of course, Aris tot le ' s Poli t ics
is of much assistance. Plato has very l i t t l e to say that
is of histor ical value. Herodotus confines his direct
statements about Solon almost exclusively to the story of
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 23/96
22-
Croesus. 0f occasional indirec t help are Demosthenes, Aes-
chines, I ~ y s i a s , Diogenes, Laert ius , Aeschines and Suidas.
II . Secondary sources:
Kenyon's Edit io Princeps of the Consti tut ion of
Athens offers many splendid notes and a helpful ins t ruc t ion.
Greenidge 1 s Handbook of Greek Const i tut ional His
tory i s extremely u s e ~ 1 1 , especial ly as he gives a complete
treatment of the whole of Greek const i tut ional his tory, and,
thereby, shows the relat ionship between Solon and other re
formers.
Bury's History of Greece contains a fa i r ly tho
rough treatment of the period.
Oox 1 s Lives of Greelc Statesmen, though some'\vhat
out of date , should not be dispensed with.
A great deal of usefu l information i s to be found
in Glotz 's Greek City and in Hall iday 's Growth of the City
State.
Others of less importance wi l l be found in the
ceneral bibliography.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 24/96
Notes to Chapter I
1) Grundy, G.B., A History of the Greek and Roman World,p. 91
2) Curtius, Ernest, The Historx of Greece, Vol. 1 , p. 316.
3) The exact date of Solon's archonship was lone; been amatter of dispute. 'l
1he majority of authors, hm1ever,agree on 594 B.C., though there i s some evidence fo r592.
4) '11he Diacri i , the Pedieis, and the Paral i .
5) Plutarch's Solon, chap. 13.
6) Plutarch and Aristotle give various t i t l e s to Solon. Heis cal led a ' corrector ' and a ' framer of a const i tut ion '(plut . Sol. Chap. 16) ; ' reconci ler ' and 'archon' (Athe-nian Constitution, Chap. 5).
'7) Poem because Greek prose had not yet been born. Ivlany ofSolon's poems are nothing more than pol i t ica l pamphletswritten in verse.
8) This couplet is a contribution of the n e w - f o ~ t n d Consti-tution of Athens.
9) "Solon, son of Exekestides, was a Eupatrid of middlingfortune, but of the purest heroic blood, belonging tothe gens or family of the Kodrids and Neleids andt racing his origin to the god Poseidon. His father issaid to have diminished his sustance by prodigal i ty,which compelled Solon in his e ~ r l i e r years to have re-course to t rade, and in th is pursuit he visi ted manyparts of Greece and Asia." Grote, George, History ofGreece, vol. 1 , p. 577.
10) Athenian Constitution, chap. 4 and 5. Translation ofH. G. Kenyon.
1 1 ~ Ath. Const. , chap. 3.
12) Greenidge, A. H. J . , A Handbook of Greek Consti tutionalH i s t ~ r y , p. 136.
13) Ath. Const. , chap. 3.
14) Ath. Const. , chap. 8.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 25/96
-24-
15) Ath. Const., chap. 4.
16) Kenyon, F. G., Aristotle .2!! the Constitution of Athens,(Editio Princeps), cf. note on ch. 4 ., pp. 9 and 10.
17) Halliclay, Wm., The Growth .2.f the City State , notes to
lecture v. note 10, p. 135.
18) Kenyon, op, c i t . , note on p. 9.
19) Greenidge, op. c i t . , p. 138.
20) "For the council of ex-archons, the areopagus to whichwas entrusted the recrui t ing of magistrates, had foundi t too easy to manipulate the drawing of lots and toturn i t for a l l pract ical purposes into co-optation."
(Greek City by Glotz, p. 209.)21) Greenidge, op. c i t . , p. 4.
22) Aristot le 's Pol i t ics , i i i . 3.
23) ibid. iv . 11
24) Livingstone, R. w., The Legacy of Greece, p. 325.
25) Grundy, op. c i t . , note on PP• 93 and 94.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 26/96
-25-
Chapter I I
Part I- -'rHE ·HEKTEMOROI.
Economically, as we have seen in chapter one, the
poorer classes or Athenian society round themselves in a
very sorry plight . So much we can say without rear or con
t radict ion; and only on so much and not much more are the
authori t ies in agreement. The moment one seeks inrormation
on who were poor, the exact why of the i r poverty, the pre
cise nature or the i r poverty, at thatmoment
does he leap
into a merry welter of contradictory statements. Since,
as we have a r ight to expect, a l l these opinions are but in
terpretat ions and explanations or the chier or iginal sources
i t seems only reasonable f i r s t , tha t , we bring those sources
together, study them and see what just i f icat ion there is ror
the interpretat ions which they have inspired.
No sooner does one mention the agricultural poor or
Solon's time, than he rinds himselr face to face with the
interpretat ion or the word Hektemoroi. The l i t e r a l trans
lat ion of "sixth-parter" is both obvious and simple. That
these sixth-parters formed one or the classes most hard
pressed economically is also beyond question. But who was
the sixty-parter? What does the term mean? Does he work
the r ields for a s ixth part of the increase and give f ive
sixths to the landowner? Or is the si tuat ion reversed
with the landowner receiving a s ixth and the worker five
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 27/96
-26-
sixths?
We have four main sources of information, Aris tot le ,
Plutarch, Photius and Pollux. Firs t of a l l , le t us see what
they have to say.
In the second chapter of the Athenian Consti tution,
Aristotle speaks as follows:" •••• but the poorer classes , men,
women and children were in absolute slavery to the r ich. They
were known as Pelatae and also as Hektemoroi, because, for
th is rental , they cultivated the lands of the r ich. The
whdle co1mtry was in the hands of a few persons, and i f the
tenants failed to pay the i r rent they were l iable to be
hauled into slavery, and thei r children with them.u
From Plutarch we have, "All the people were in debt
to the r ich; for ei ther theyt i l led
thesoi l
for them andpaid one-sixth of the produce, receiving the name Hektemoroi,
and Thetes, or they were subject to seizure by thei r cre
ditors-some were actual ly in bondage a t home, others were
being sold into foreign lands." (1)
Photius in his explanation of the word Prelatae
says, "Pelatae are men who are in a s tate of slavery for a
wage, since the word "pelasn means near, as for instance
' those approaching nearest by reason of poverty ' . In th is
he claims the authority of Aristot le . And again, "Those
working for the i r neigobors; the same men are called Thetes
and Hektemoroi, since they work the land for a sixth of the
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 28/96
-27-
produce."
Pollux is somewhat clearer . 11 Pelatae and Thetes
are the names of freemen, who, through poverty, are in a
s tate of slavery for a wage." (2) Later , he says, "Hekte
moroi, Pelatae among the Athenians." (3)
Before preceeding to an examination of the texts ,
it should be observed that , while we are constantly dealing
with English t ranslat ions , a l l words and phrases that can
throw l ight on th is subject aref i r s t
examined in the original Greek. In other words a l l arguments are based not on
the English but on the Greek.
Let us examine each text and see what i t has to of
fer us. In the Constitution we shal l find in outline the
reasons why the sixth-parters have occasioned so much dis
cussion. In the f i r s t place, the general statement i s made
that the 'poorer classes were in absolute slavery to the
r ich . ' Yet, immediately following we are told that these
people, who are in absolute slavery and cal led pelatai and
hektemoroi, receive a t least this l a t t e r name of hektemoroi
from the fact that ' for th is renta l ' (referr ing to the sixth}
they work the f ields of the r ich. Now persons, who are in
absolute slavery, can hardly be said to 'pay ren t ' to those
to whom they are enslaved. That a slaver owner may allow
his slave a certain amount of the f ru i t of his labors we
are ready to admit, but tha t he should rent out his property
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 29/96
-28-
to his slaves seems to d e n ~ n d an explanation of some sor t .
The word used for rental offers l i t t l e l ight be-
causa "misthosis", as far as we can learn, was used only to
express hiring and renting. We must turn, therefore, to the
word slavery. I f , l a te r , we can find other instances where
this word is sed in a broader sense, we wil l have some basis
for interpret ing Aristot le ' s word in th is place as meaning
not slavery in the s t r ic tes t sense· of the term, but slavery
ofa
special kind.
To continue, there is l i t t l e we can gather here as
to the technical meaning of hektemoroi. Aristot le says
that they were hektemoroi, because they cult ivated the land
for this rental . \Vhether this ren ta l consisted in the workers
gett ing a s ixth or paying a s ixth is s t i l l an open question.
Finally we are told tha t , i f the workers did not pay
the rent , they were l iable to slavery. Now this term ' l i ab le '
to slavery d,sserves consideration. Firs t of a l l , a person who
is already a slave (and this would seem to be what A : - : ~ i s t o t l esaid above) is not ' l i ab le ' to slavery. Yet the word t ha t i s
used means ' l iab le to s lavery ' , ' l iable to be carried away'.
'Eo sum up these remarks, we find
were l iable to
1) the people were slaves;2) these ' s laves ' paid a renta l ;3) i f they did not pay the ren t , they
slavery.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 30/96
j_
j -30-
Giving slavery a s t r i c t interpretat ion, we are faced
with the diff icul ty of slaves paying rent . In th is case, they
who are already slaves, would be l iable to slavery fo r fai lure
to pay the rent . 1 ~ e only way to harmonize the texts seems
to be that this slavery was rather a state of serfdom from
which state of serfdom, the person involved vmuld become an
actual slave only i f he fai led to pay the required renta l .
This explanation can be h a 1 ~ o n i z e d even with the expression
'absolute ' slavery on the assumption that the tersm of the con
t ract were so severe tha t the s tate of the serf was the equi-
valent of that of the slave, i f not worse.
I f the workers are in such a dire state that they can
be compared to men in 'absolute ' slavery, then i t i s reason-
able to suppose the hektemoroi did not pay the ovmers of the
land one-sixth of the produce but f ive-sixths. There seems
to be no reason why the consideration of the man who pays
sixteen percent of the results of his labors as rental ehould
be compared to that of a slave. Even Peis is t ratus , who was
regarded as a mild tyrant , levied a general ten percent tax
on a l l returns from agriaulture. P.gain, an owner who obtains
a mere sixth of the f ru i t of hi:s land can scarcely be cal led
a slave master.
The f i r s t point noticeable in Plutarch 's statements is
that in his g:eneral remark as to the s ta te of the people he
does not say that they were in slavery but that they were .!!!
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 31/96
-31-
debt. There poor people, who are debtors of the r ich, he
tehn proceedes to divide into ~ v o classes, those who t i l l
the soi l for the r ich and those who have contracted a d e b ~
with the i r persons as security. Of these l a te r he asser ts
that they are l iable to seizure and that some are already
slaves.
At once there is a new angel to the case. The
hektemoroi are not slaves but men who finding themselves in
debt till the soi l for the i r creditors and receive in par t
a return of the produce. They are distinguislled from the
second class of debtors who have pledged the i r persons as
security and, on the i r inabi l i ty to pay the i r debt, are sub
jec t to being seized as slaves. This is in accord with our
interpretat ion of the passage from the Constitution, namely,
that the hektemoroi are not slaves in the s t r ic t sense of
the term, but only in so fa r as the i r condition is tantamount
to slavery.
A real diff icul ty i s presented by the unequivacle
statement that the hektemoroi paid one sixth of the produce
to those who controlled the land they t i l l ed . Since Aris
tot le has l e f t no direct statement to contradict th is as-
sert ion but only led us indirect ly to believe that they paid
f ix-s ixths , we must, fo r the moment at l eas t , allow Plut
arch 's words to go unchallenged. Later on, we hope to be
able so to combine Aris tot le ' s remarks with other evidence
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 32/96
c----------------32 -
that we wil l be jus t i f ied in claiming that in th is point
Plutarch was mistaken.
Before going on we may well ca l l attention to
the fact that the passage from Plutarch's f i r s t class of
debtors to his second class may have been extremely easy.
Due to a fai lure of the crop or same other misfortune,
the hectemoroi may have been forced to borrow to dide over
till the coming year. Having no land of the i r own and a l
ready in dis tress , the i r only recourse would be to borrow
on the security of the i r persons. 1 ~ i s , once more, offers
an indirect confirmation of our remarks of Aris tot le ' s 'ab-
solute s lavery. ' The position of the hektemoroi was so pre
carious that i t took very l i t t l e to jeopardize the i r l iber-
ty .
Photius, the next author we shal l deal with,
claims he i s quoting Aristotle in what he has to say on our
subject. Obviously, since we have no defini te grounds to
disprove th is claim, we must allow i t to stand.
The question \rlth Photius is the defini t ion of
the word pelata i , but , as he says explici t ly that these
pelatae were the same as theses and hektomorii, anything
said about them wil l also apply to the class we are study
ing. Of these pela ta i he has a combination of words which
onee again bring us back to the odd use of the word 'en-
slaved. ' He says that the pelatai were in the s tate of
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 33/96
-33-
slavery for ~ · In th is he seems to be saying the srume
thing as Aristotle except that he is viewing the si tuation
from a different angle. Aristot le has aclled them slaves
because they paid rent . Photius cal ls them slaves because
of the i r pay. These two statements are easi ly reconciled.
Aristot le looks a t them from the point of view of what they
paid the overlords; Photius from the viewpoint of the amount
which they are allowed to keep.
Thus, once more we are confirmed in our conclusion tha t i t was not a slavery in the s t r i c t sense of the
terra. Some species of subjection i t must have been, but not
slavery as we ordinarily understand the word. Farther along
Photius redefines the Pelatai as men working for the i r nei
f):Jbors. This would be a remarkable way of describing a
slave.
Undoubtedly, the most interest ing par t of this
quotation i s the defini t ion of the hektemoroi. "These same
men, "he says,11are thetes and hektemoroi, because theywork
the land for one six th of the produce. "The words six th
partu are in the dat ive, a clear indication that the s ixth
was the reward of thei r labors and that f ive-sixth went to
the overlord. I see no other way of t ranslat ing the ori
E·inal Greek.
Our l a s t b i t of evidence comes from Pollux I I I .
82. Recalling tha t in IV. 165 he says that hektomoroi is an
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 34/96
Athenian name fo r Pelatae, we find two interest ing as-
sertions:
1) Pelatae and theses are the names of freemen,
2) who through poverty are in slavery for awage.
Now, since the form of the verb 1 to be a
slave ' is a part ic iple agreeing with freemen, one inter-
pretat ion might be tha t he i s talking about men, natives of
Attica, once free but now in slavery. However, i f we ap
ply the principle we have been using throughout, that real
slaves do not receive a wage, then we must reaffirm that
slavery i s used in a borad sense to describe men who tech
nically are freemen, but , in rea l i ty , are so poverty
stricken and so dependent on the i r overlords that the i r con-
dit ion is tantamount to real slavery.
are:
Our conclusions to a l l that has been said above
(a) The hektemoroi were not slaves but freemen.
(b) But they were dependent in some special way toan overlord.
(c) They paid a fixed percentage of thei r crops tothe overlord.
(d) This percentage amounted to five-sixths of thecrop.
(e) They were in debt to the ovmer of the land.
(f) They were distinguished from a second class ofdebtors who have pledged their persona as security.
(g) Since they were debtors but distinguished from
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 35/96
-35-
those whose persons were mortgaged, we may suppose tha t the i r
debt was contracted with the i r land as securi ty. Perhaps this
was the very land they were working.
h) Their economic l i fe was so precarious that they
were in constant danger of having to mortgage
their persons.
i ) This would not come about throughinabili ty to
pay the i r rent , because they did not have to
surrender any fixed amount but rather f ivesixths of the produce, no matter how large or
small the crop might be.
j ) Should the crops fa i l with the resul t tha t they
had to borrow to l ive , i t may be tha t part of
thei r dependence on the overlord consisted in
th i s , tha t they were forced to borrow from him.
The securi ty for such a loan would have to be
the person of the borrower.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 36/96
vVhile on the subject of the hektemoroi, there
is one question we must examine, even though s t r ic t ly speak-
ing it would seem to belong to par t two of their chapter.
Brief ly, the problem is this?~ f u a t
did Solondo
to relive themisery of the hektemoroi? We shal l t ry to outl ine the problem
involved.
In the f i r s t place, both Aristot le and Plutarch
mention the dis t ress of the hektemoroi as one of the greatest
diff icul t ies which Solon was called upon to solve. That he
did solve i t seems to be manifest from this tha t , while they
are always mentioned as those needing help before the reforms,
they are not mentioned as those dissat isf ied with the solution
he has to offer . This much seems to be established.
applied such a sat isfactory remedy to the i r d i f f icul t ies
we hear no further mention of them.
In the second place both Aristot le and Plutarch,
giving prominence to the sufferings of the Hektemoroi,
to ta lk about re l ie f in the following terms:
Aristot le says, "As soon as he was at the head
f affa i rs , Solon l iberated the people once and for a l l , by
a l l loans on the securi ty of the person of the
and a t the same time he hade laws by which he cancelled
l l debts, public and provate. (4).
Plutarch affirms, "For the f i r s t thing whcih we
was, that what debts remained should be forgiven, and
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 37/96
-37-
no man for the future, should engage the body of his debtor
for security. u ( 5)
Both authors cannot but have had the hektemoroi
in min,d when they wrote the passages just quoted. I t is con
ceivable that two authors should mention two classes of dis
tressed people, proceed to the measures intended for re l ie f
did affect both classes. To s ta te i t more clearly some
authori t ies would ~ o n c l u d e tha t , because Solon did not make
a new distr ibut ion of the land, the hektemoroi were not
directly benefited by Solon's provisions. They were only
benefited indirect ly in so fa r as they could not pledge
the i r persons in case they should find it necessary to borrow
money in the future.
Onthe contrary,
webelieve that
wemust seek in
the tes ts of Aristotle and Plutarch some benefi t for the hek
temoroi besides the indirect one just mentioned. Let us re-
cal l once again that thei r rea l diff icul ty resulted from the
fact tha t they received only a s ixth par t of the produce of
the land. Further, they were not in slavery in the s t r i c t
sense and they have been distingushed from those whose persons
were l iable to seizure for n o n - p a ~ e n t of debt. Yet is dis
t inct ly stated that they were in debt. Somehow, i t must have
been the cancellation of the debts which afforded them re l ie f .
The question now arises as to how they became in
volved in debt and what surey they gave for the money they
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 38/96
borrowed. At f i r s t glance, the problem seems insoluble.
we are told tha t the land they worked belonged to thei r
creditors . Hence, the debt they then owed could not
have been entered into with the ~ a n d as surety. In the
second place they are distinguished from those whose per
sons had been mortgaged. On what surety, then, did they
borrow the money?
A further problem is created by the fact
that Solon'sovm
words inform us tha t ,
"The mortgage-stones that covered her (the
ear th) , by me
Removed,--the land tha t was a slave is free.u
(5) Plutarch quotes these l ines in support of his s tate-
ment that i t was the taking off of debts that afforded re
l i e f . There is no need here to enter into a discussion
as to whether the stones tha t Solon removed were marks of
ownership or mortgage-pil lars. vVhatever they were, they
indicated a control over the land by the large-land-owners.
But who was rel ived by the removal of these stones? I t
was hardly the class of debtors who had irrevocably los t
thei r land and had already mortgaged thei r persons. But,
since these men were not affected by th is action and since
we must find what i t was tha t benefited the hektemoroi,
i t does not seem unreasonable tha t we seek to connect the
removal of the boundary stone with the aid rendered to the
hektemoroi.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 39/96
-M -offer the following explanation. Originally, the hektemoroi
were small landowners. Through various misfortunes they
were forced to borrow on the i r lands from thei r wealthier
neighbors. Unable to pay the i r debts, the i r land wwere for
forfei t to the i r credi t rs , but , perhaps because t h ~ s land
could not be completely alienated from the t r ibe or family
to which the borrower belonged, the creditor could not as
sume complete legal control. For a l l pract ical pruposes the
land was his ; he had to use and control of i t , even though
the legal t i t l e s t i l l remained nominally with the debtor.
To indicate his control , the creditor placed on the land
some mark, the 'horoi ' of which Solon makes mention. The
borrower, deprived of his means of l ivel ihood, became a de
pendent of his wealthy neighbor, working the land for one-
sixth of the produce and faced with the constant menace of
having to borrow on the securi ty of his person and becoming
eventually a slave.
In th is way we can explain the statement tha t the
hektemoroi were debtors, since, though thei r lands were for
fe i t , the creditor could not affect a complete foreclosure.
In th is way, we can understand how Solon sided the hektemoroi
By his cancellation of debts, the lands which had never
passed under the complete control of the creditor reverted to
to the hektemoroi and gave him such a sat isfactory new s tar t
that neither Plutarch nor Aristot le found occasion to mention
this class again.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 40/96
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ 4 - o - - ·Ar,ain, i t removes the di f f icul ty of having to explain the ex-
act nature of the 'horoi 1 • Suffice i t to say that they indi-
cated an almost complete control on the part of the credi tor .
While our theory may not give complete sat is fact ion,
yet , i t does compose a very great number of differences. I t
accords perfectly with the ten points we established above
from the analysis of what ancient author i t ies to say about
the hektemoroi. This in i t se l f i s no small r e c o w ~ e n d a t i o n .
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 41/96
- - - - - - - - - - .-41-
l ~ O ' r E S TO CHAPTER I I
1 • P1ut. Sol. Ch. 13
2 - Po1lox I I I . - 82
3 - Pollox IV. - 165
4 - Ath. Const. Ch. 6
5 - Plut . Sol. Ch. XV
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 42/96
CHAPTER I I I
CANCELLATION OF DEB'rS AND ~ CHANGE IN THE MONETARY STANDARD.
In accordance with the procedure we have been following
thus fa r , we shal l take up the question of the cancellat ion
of debts by presenting the words of Plut:1rch and Aristot le .
In chapter 15 of his Solon Plutarch makes the follow
inG statements: "For th is was the f i r s t pol i t i ca l act of his
administration, that what debts were then in existence should
be cancelled and no man for the future should engage the body
of his debtor for securi ty . Though some, as Androtion, af-
firm tha t the debts were not cancelled, but the in teres t only
lessened, which suff ic ient ly pleased the poor; so tha t they
named th is benef i t the Seisachthea, together with the en
ln.rging of the i r measures, and raising the value of t he i r
money; for he made the mina which before r;assed fo r seventy
three drachmas, g.o fo r a hundred; so t ha t , though. the number
of pieces in the payment was equal, the value was less ; ·which
~ r o v e d a benefi t to those tha t were to discharge debts, and
no less to the creditors . But most agree tha t it was the
taking off the debts tha t was cal led seisachthea, which is
confirmed by some places in his poems in which Solon takes
honor to himself tha t from the ear th
11 he removed the boundary-stones tha t every·where encum-
bered her; from the ear th tha t was once enslaved but now is
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 43/96
-43-
f ree · 11,
tha t some who had been seized for the i r debts he had brought
back from other countr ies , where
--so fa r the i r lo t to roam,
They had forsot the language of the i r home;
and some he had se t a t l iber ty , - -
vVho here in shameful servitude were held."·
In chapter nineteen, v;e f ind, "-----observing tha t the
people now free from the i r debts----"
The two following quotations are from the Athenian
Consti tut ion, chapters s ix and ten.
"As soon as he was a t the head of af fa i r s , Solon l ibe
rated the people once and for a l l , by prohibi t ing a l l loans
on the securi ty of the person of the debtor: and a t the
same time he made laws by which he cancelled public and pr i
vate debts. This measure is c o m J ~ o n l y called the Seisach-
the ia , since thereby the people had the i r loads removed from
them. 11
"These seem to be the democratic features of his laws.
But, in addi t ion, before the period of his legis la t ion, he
made his abol i t ion of debts , and af te r it his increase in
the standard of weights and measures, and of the currency;
During his term of office the measures were made la rger than
those of Pheidon, and the mina, which previously contained
about seventh dracb.mas, was raised to the fu l l hundred. 11
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 44/96
~ 4 4 -To our mind the evidence i s too scanty to warra n t a
c lea r -cu t decis ion as to whether Solon a c t u ~ l l y cancel led
?.11 debts or whether he simply cancel led those debts which
involved as sure ty the land or persons of the debtors , of -
f e r in s , a t the same t ime, some measure of heln to others by
devaluat ing the curi 'ency. The arguments on ne i the r s ide are
strong enough to afford complete convict ion.
'ro begin with both Aris to t l e and Plutarch were en-
debted to Androtion, whom both used as a source of t he i r in -
formation. His \70rds, then , cannot be disregarded. . Yet , vie
we have l i t t l e to t e l l us of the worth of h is s ta tements .
So fevr frauaents remain of h is work, the Atth i s , t ha t it is
impossible to judge the genera l accuracy of h is asse r t ions .
Ona t l e a s t one point
inthe quota t ion
L;iven by Plut -
arch , Androtion seems to be mistaken. His claim t ha t Solon
reduced the ra te of in te res t i s cont radic ted in J.Jysias x . lB ,
r!here i s :r.1entionecl a law of Solon which permit ted any in -
t e r e s t agreed upon by the cont rac t ing par t ies . Of th i s
Glover has th i s to say:
nsolon gave the trad.er and merchant nev1 freedom; he
abolished s tupid im})ediments to incJ.l_;_str:r l i l ~ e the old c l i en t
r·v.les; he vJould have no laws fixin.c:: ~ ra tes of in te re s t .
'J.ihe use of cap i t a l i s the sec re t of ec anomie !':)rosperi ty , and
it is bes t used by those who knov1 the condi t ions . Who could
bes t f ix the prop.er in te re s t fo r a loan on bottomry, on a
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 45/96
-45-
voyage to the Black Sea'? Surely, the men who Jmow the sea
and the seasons and the other r i sks ; then, l e t them f ix the i r
oym ra tes of in teres t . 11( 1)
When Androtion claims th.<J_ t 11 the debts wei'e not cancel
led , but in teres t only lessened" he is di rec t ly contradict ing
Solon himself , who lays claim to the trm-fold. dis t inc t ion of
cancell ing the debts entered into with land and the debtor 's
')orson as secur i ty . Pract ica l ly , every modern a'.J.thor allows
th is claim of Solon. The rea l ar,r;ument concerns debts invol
ving other secur i t i es . I t is th is l a t t e r question which we
must examine in z:;reater de ta i l .
Plutarch admits that even in his day the quest ion was
the subject of debate; but in the quotat ion given above, he
rejects the O}Jinion of Androtion and those tha t held vlith
him. Yet, in attempting to support his statement from the
'JOem.s of Solon, he addv.ces references v.rhich jus t i fy only the
8.ss1.-unption of the cancel la t ion of debts involving land and
the debtor 's person. Since he undoubtedly had access to a l l
of Solon's poetry, th is inab i l i ty to produce sa t isfac tory
testimony would seem to argue, ult i lnately , that Plutarch had
to res t his case on t radi t ion ra ther than on direc t evidence.
Aris to t le , on the other r_,and, Y!ho nrote co:.1turiec be
:' ore ?luto.rch, is sa t i s f ied with the bald asser t ion tha t
Solon 11 cancelled c.ll debts . 11 Kenyon in his edi t io princeps
of the Const i tut ion L.:<.rJ.J.'lecitatingly acco'Jts Aris to t le ' s word
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 46/96
-46
t ha t a l l debts were cancel led , i r respec t ive of secur i ty .
Thus, in h is in t roduct ion he says , 11 A ll debts , rn:tblic and
:;:r•ivate, were cancel led , and fo r the fu ture the secur ing of
c'Lebts unon the :rerr.on of the debtor v.ras forbidclen. (2)
Comru=mting on chapter s ix he gives the onme unc on
r1it5_onal approval to the l e t t e r of the t ex t : - 11 I f , however,
flny doubt remained as to whether it amounted to a clean
sweep of a l l debts , Ari s to t l e ' s express def in i t ion of it as
shoul(3_ rerr1ove i t . I t v:ould ·even e . p ~ ~ - , e a r tlu:d:; it extended be-
~ r a n d de1Jts secured on. the land, since no lim.ia t t ion i s ex
~ ; r e s c 1 e d and rubl ic debts as r!el l a s ::::-'rlvate \':ere j_ncluded.
I t is ha rd l j l i ke ly tha t debts to the St? te -vvere secured
by mortr::;age, since pa:;rment of such l i a b i l i t i e s can seldom
be deferred or allowed to f a l l in to arrear•s. i ' robably, in
clealinc; v;i th the Jo.rge nur:11Jer of obligat ions secr:1.rcd on the
ncrson or Iand of the debtor , Solon found it impossible to
avoid touching the r e m c ~ i n i n g classes of debts , and W9.s Dn-
able to annul the one 171 thout also annul l in[ the other .
As the usua l secur i ty was evident ly r ea l Droperty, it i s
probably tha t the amount of debts otherwise secured wo.s
comp2.ratively smal l , so t ha t the extens ion of the
___to a l l debts a l ike ef fec ted a c rea t sim
-ol i f icat ion of the measure without any cons iderable in
crease in hD_rdship. In shor t , Solon 's econor:'1ical reform was
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 47/96
~ 4 7 -was a complete m ~ e a s u r e of novae tabulae." (3)
In l ike manner does Greenidge express his views--
"Solon seems to have found but one means of meeting the
c1ifficulty---the heroic measure of ·a cancell ing of a l l debts ,
whether owed to the individual 's or to the s ta te , accompanied
by a prohibition against lending on the surety of the per-
son 1( 4)
Halliday takes a middle posi t ion, holding the complete
cancelling of debts but suggesting that "changes in the currency and in the system of weights and measures may also have
benefited the lower classes. 11 ( 5)
Grote, writing of course before the discovery of t h ~Constitution and Aris tot le ' s unequivacal indorsement of the
complete cancellat ion thes i s , also inclines to take a middle
course. nHow Androtion came to maintain such an opinion we
cannot easi ly understand. For the fragments now remaining
from Solon seem direct ly to reffute i t , though, on the other
hand, they do not go so fa r as to substant iate the fu l l ex-
tent of the oppos i t.e view entertained by many ·writers-- that
a l l money contracts indiscrimately were rescinded: against
which there i s also a further reason, that i f the fac t had
been so, Solon could have had no motive to debase the money
standard. Such debasement supposes that there :r:mst have been
~ o m e debtors a t leas t whose contracts renmined valid, and whom
nevertheless, he desired par t ia l ly to ass is t . 11 (6)
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 48/96
-48-
Jolm Mitchell , in his ar t ic le for the Encyclopedia
Brtt tanica, af ter admitting the abolit ion of a l l debts ihvol
ving the debtor 's person, gives the following reason for dis-
agreeing with Gelbert and Busolt who maintain tha t a l l debts
were cancelled. " •••• strong reasons may, however, be advan
ced against , among others that the Greek, unlike the Roman
revolutionary, though ready to deal freely with the property
of others, did not seek to remedy f inancial dif f icul t ies by
abolishing debts." (7)
In Hellenic Civil iat ion by- Botsford and Sihler we find
this note on page 142.
"Aristot le does not say here that ht abolished a l l
debts. The only rel iable information on the subject which
he had was derived from Solon's poems quoted by him•. From
these poems we hage a r:i.ght to infer that Solon cancelled
those debts only which were based on the secuiry (1) of land
(2) of the person. I t is a pert inent fac t , too , that Andro
t ion understood that Solon l e f t some debts uncancelled."(8)
Without attempting to solve the diff icul ty, we wish to
ca l l at tent ion to several points pert inent to this question.
Firs t of a l l , in a large measure, much of the argument ul t i -
mately turns on the relat ive authority of Aristot le and
Androtion. Of Androtion we have l i t t l e information, except
that he enjoyed some reputation as an orator and was one of
a l ine of men who wrote not-too-important chronologies of
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 49/96
-49·
Greek his tory . His cloru i t fa l l s within the very period of
Aris to t le ' s l i f e . On the other hand, Aris to t le deservedly
is re:nked as one of the most t h o r o u g h - g o i n ~ scholars of a l l
time.
Secondly, t radi t ion, which is not to be spurned except
on very sat is factory evidence, stands in d i rec t opposition
to Androtion. Even the s tory tha t Solon 1 s friends availed
themselves of advance information on the contemplated reforms
e.nd borrowed huge sums jus t before the cancel la t ion, while
not conclusive (for they may have borrowed on land) shows how
firmly establ ished the t rad i t ion rea l ly way.
Aris tot le and Plutarch both take cognizance of these
ta les and make an effor t of discountenance them. Aristot le
does so on the grounds of Solon's general high character .(9)
Plutarch r e ta i l s the s tory t ha t the ereat refonner was a vic-
tim to h is own innovations to the extent of betv!een five and
f i f teen ta len ts from which, i t was sa id , he released his ovm
credi tors (10)
Final ly , Adnrotio 1 s case becomes s t i l l weaker when, as
'Ne shal l see , the change in the standard was i:m.perat i ve i f
Athens was to achieve the commercial :'lro:rninence which Solon
has des t inefor her . In other v1ords, i f to Plutarch 's denial
and to Aris to t le ' s si lence v1e can also addl:tce a strong motive
which wil l connect the new monentary standard to foreign
rather than domestic :r;olicy, then, Andtotion's contention be-
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 50/96
-50-
comes almost untenable.
CHANGE IN THE MONEY STANDARD.---
At the outset we must remember tha t we are dealing with
early Athenian his tory and must guard against introducing con-
cepts which l a t e r become corm;1onplace. For instance, we are so
accustomed to consider Corinth as the great r iva l of Athens,
that v1e may forget tha t the tv:o countries were fas t fr iends a t
this period of the i r his tory. In the same way, Aegina, which
was tobe
apol i t i ca l
footbal l inl a ter Greek his tory,
wasa t
this time a t b i t t e r enmity with Athens. I t sounds paradoxical
that Athens actual ly borrowed twenty ships from Corinth to
wage a war on the Aeginetans. (11). Moreover, Aegina was a
c:reat connnercial centre when Athens began to make her debut
in the world of commerce.
To expand her com"1ercial re la t ions Athens had to look
easy instead of west. In the east were the great centers in
Euboea and the prosperous Greek ci t ies in Ionia. In the eas t ,
too, was the r iches t source of grain to feed the increasing
population of Attica. In the west the seas were controlled
by inimical Aegina.
With these thoughts in mind it i s easy to see a profound
commercial advantage in the adoption by Solon of a new stan-
dard of currency. Thus fa r Attica had used the Aeginetan
standard, which must have hampered her free re la t ions with the
eastern centres of commerce. Consequently, though Aristotle
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 51/96
-51-
and Plutarch are s i len t on th is aspect of the change, i t is
not far-fetched in the l igh t of the impetus Solon gave to
coilL1'11erce, to l ink h is change in the currency with the com
mercial advantages to be drived from it •••
Up to the discovery of the Constitution of Athens, i t
was :::_enerally accepted tha t Solon's reform involved a change
with the proportion of 100 drachmas to 73. (12) In the work
of Aris to t le , however, the propertion laid down is 100:70.
Professor Percy Gardner points out tha t the f i r s t is close to
the propertion of the Aeginetan to the Attica standard, the
second tha t of the Aeginetan to the Euboic."It is becoming
very natural tha t Plutarch 's authori ty writing a t a time when
the Attic standard was in universal use , should have supposed
tha t i t was tha t which was introduced to Solon. But we have
in Aristot le a valuable record of the rea l facts of the case;
i f we may believe him, i t was not the l a t t e r Attic standard
·which Solon introduced but the rea l Et.'-boic, which was appreci
ably l ighter ." This change l inks Athens to the standard
"which was already accepted a t Challds and Eretr ia and (with
a dif ferent system of division) a t Corinth." (13)
11 Another innovation of Solon's vms destined to improve
the econor1ic condition of Athens in a much more indrect
fashion. The ci ty had dm".'ll to th is time been using money
struck on the :")1.1eidonian standards, such as circulated in
f'elopannesus or Soeotia. "Solon lTI['.de a sweeping cbE.nge by
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 52/96
-52-
s t r ik ing coins based, not on th is standard, but on tha t known
as t'!:le Euboic, which was employed in the great commercial
c i t ies of Challds and Eretr ia . This made the currency of
Athens interchangeable with that of her weal thy neigb.bors,
though i t somevrhat complicated exchanges with Aegina dnd
Thebes." (14)
In conclusion i t vJill be servicable to s-..1:::-xmrize the con
tents of th is portion of the thes is .
1) All debts on the securi ty of the debtor 's land and
person were cancelled.
2) By law no man could in future give his o ~ T I person
tha t of his wife, his children or unmarried s i s te r
as securi ty for debt.
3) Citizens sold as slaves in foreign lands were re -
deemed and restored to t he i r native land. We are
not told how th i s was effected.
4) Androtion 1s contention that debts were not can-
cel led but re l ie f afforded to debtors by the de-
valuation of the currency seems hard to defend.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 53/96
-53-
Par:b i'hree
IMPETUS !Q COMMERCIAL PROGRESS
Contemporary histor ians, in contract to ear l ier wri ters ,
have placed special s t ress on the economic factors in Solon's
reforms. In common w i th the general tendency to in terpret
events in terms of economics, more emphasis is being oaid on
Solon, the economist, than on Solon, the great legis la tor .
The facts in the case give a measure of jus t i f ica t ion to the
new posi t ion, though the recognition of his work in the f ie ld
of economics must not blind us to his outstanding work in the
pol i t ica l f ie ld. The t ruth i s that Solon deserves our regard
under both these t i t l e s .
Already in the introduction we have touched upon the cir -
cumstance that Athens, i f i t was to r ise to preeminence in the
world of Grecian s ta tes , must needs do so on the plane of
industrx and not on that of agricul ture. As an ar is tocra t
Solon may never have averted to this simple t ru th . The future
of the ar is tocta t of Attica was bound up with the successrul
cult ivat ion of his landed esta tes . But Solon was not only an
aris tocrat . I t wil l be remembered tha t , for some reason or
other , the fottunes of his family had dwindled, with the re -
sul t that ar is tocrat ic Solon became also a man of commerce.
Tradit ion has i t that even a young man he had t ravel led ex
tensively in prusuance of his commercial enterprises. As a
consequence to the ar is tor ra t ic Solon were added a business
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 54/96
-54-
ins t inc t and vis ion which he was to use to such advantage to
advance the fortunes of Attica .
Plutarch 's remarks are extremely in teres t ing. "Observing
the c i ty to be f i l l ed with persons that flocked from a l l
parts into Attica fo r security of l iving and tha t most of
the country was barren and unfrui t ful and tha t t raders a t
sea import nothing to those tha t could give them nothing in
exchange, he turned his ci t izens to t rade, and made a law
that no son should be obliged to rel ieve a father who had not
bred him up to any cal l ing. I t is true tha t Lycurgus having
a ci ty free from a l l strangers and land, according to Euri-
pides.
'Large for large hosts , for twice theil" number sma;J..l, 11
and, above a l l , an abundance of laobrers about Sparta , who
should not be l e f t i d l e , but nmst be kept down with contin
ual t o i l and labour, did ,_vell to take off his ci t izens from
laborious and mechianical occupations, and keep them to t he i r
arms and teach them only the a r t of war. But Solon, f i t t ing
his laws to the s ta te of things and not making things to su i t
h is laws and finding the ground scarce r ich enough to main-
ta in the husbandman and al together incapable of eeding an un-
occupied and le isurely multi tude, brought trades into credi t
and ordered the Areopagites to examine how every man got his
l iving and chast ise the id le ." (15)
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 55/96
-55-
"He permitted only o i l to be exported and those tha t ex-·
ported any other f ru i t the archon was solemnly to curae or
else pay a hundred dracr.J:nas himself; and, th is law v.ras wri t
ten on the f i r s t table , and, therefore , le t none think i t
incredible, as some aff i rm, t ha t the exportatj_on of f i r s
was once unlawful and the informer against the delinquents
called a sychophant.n (16)
"The law concerning the natural izat ion of foreigners of-
fers some dif fucul ty , because i t allows cit izenship only to
t11ose who were in p e r p ~ t u a l exi le from the i r whole family
for the sake of exercising some manual t rade. This he did,
not to discourage s trangers , but ra ther to invi te them to a
permanent par t ic ipa t ion in the privi leges of the government;
ond besides, he t.hought those wou.ld prove the more fa i th fu l
ci t izens who had been forced from the i r own country or vol
untari ly forsook i t , (17)
Plutarch therefore , assigns three reasons to motivate
Solon's encouragement of t rade: -
1) I m ~ i z r a t i o n into Attica was increasing;2) the country was barren and unfrui t ful ;3) t raders import nothing to those who can give nothihg
in exchange.
'rhe f i r s t reason must be read in conjunction ·with the
passage relat ing to irrnnigration, where Plutarch speaks of the
natural izat ion of irrnnigrants. In the f i r s t ci ta t ion the im-
plicat ion is tha t manufacturing had to be extended in order to
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 56/96
-56-
provide food fo r the immigrants; in the th i rd we see that the
opposite was the case. Solon saw in the im .rnigrants not so
much men to be fed as men who could help the Athenians to
feed themselves. The immigrants who caught his eye were
those who came to stay, those that came with a t r ade . There
can be no doubt of the t ruth of th is interpretat ion because
i t is scarcely possible that agr icul tura l labourers would
come to Attica for "security of l iving" when Attica 's most
serious di ff icu l t ies were arising precisely from the unhappy
s i tuat ion of the agr icul tura l i s t s . In describing the causes
of Attica 's unsettled economic condition neither Aris tot le
nor Plutarch make mention of the ar t isan or the tradesman.
They seemed to be sat is f ied a t l eas t vdth the i r economic sta-
tus , even i f they were not so welll sat isf ied with the i r po-
l i t i c a l posit ion.
Str ic t ly sepaking, then, the increase of immigration i s
not to be taken closely with the ~ ~ o reasons tha t follow,
Plutarch is simply lupming together the whole s i tuat ion
that faces Solon and giving a l l the motives a t once without
distinguishing the ultimate reasons for his policy from the
remedy tha t he recognized.
The second and th ird reasons assigned by Plutarch may be
otherwise expressed by the phrase 11need of money." Someway,
somehow, Athens had to have money and industry seemed to give
the answer. Given something to se l l , then money would begin
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 57/96
.-57-
to flow in and, with money, food and power and even more in
dustry. Perhaps in his t ravels Solon had learned the lessons
of Miletus and Naul.rratis, the story of the i r Egyptian trade
and thei r speedy r ise to epulence.
And thus, i t was that with a firm hand he took control of
the s i tuat ion. No longer might the nobles seek a higher
price outside of Attica for the f ie ld produce of the relucant
soi l . Food grown in Attica had to be sold in Attica; sold
where the price could be controlled and profi teering discour-aged. Only the f ru i t of the olive might be placed on the for-
eign market. The more of th is there was to see l , the bet ter .
I f Solon might have visi ted f i f th century Attica, he could
reasonably have been proud of the numerous olive groves to
the encouragement of which he had given the f i r s t impetus.
Sparta with i t s r ich lands and with a subject race in i t s
very bosom might well t ra in her citizenw to despise the t i l l
ing of the f ields and the business marts of the world. But,
Attica was to be different . No son was obliged to support a
father who had not t rained him iether in the a r t of agricul
ture or f i t ted him out with a trade for the new l i fe of in-
dustry. To the duties of the Areopagites was added that of
examining into each man's means of support. Parasites on the
new order of things were to be chastised.
Grecian sta tes just emerging from the narrow seclusion
of the t r ibe and clan were reluctant indeed to share the c i t i -
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 58/96
-58-
zenship with outsiders . I t needed a strong hand to sweep away
this re luctance. With character is t ic courage and fores ight ,
Solon extended the ci t izenship to a l l who were in ;1erpetual
exile from the i r native land ·and to those vdllin;:.:: to se t t l e
}>ormanently y:Ji th the i r families and ~ ) l y the i r t rades. In re -
cent years someone has coined the ~ J h r a s e tl1at "no rn..:.qn ·will
f:L:;ht to defend his boarding house 11• Long ago Solon under-
stood the meaning contained in this sayin.c; and took the ·worth-
vr:"lite outsider in to the family bosom. 1.Phis policy must have
!'cad a marked success , for i t was continued un t i l the days of
Peric les . !I b i . f ' • l • t •••• y g Vlng ~ a c l I lOS fo r foreigner to oet t le
in Attica in order to exercise some ski l led cra f t , he encour-
ac;es thA r ise of industry, which was to prove, in the long
run, the salvation of the poor, and to rescue them f inal ly from
the d ~ J o n d e n c e and misery of a purely ac;rarian regime. 11( 18)
Of course, we mD.st not imagine tha t Solon l i t e ra l l y
"stood Athens on i t s head." Olive groves cannot be Imlled l ike
rabbi ts fro:rn a hat . Trade must be fouc;.ht fo r and does not come
from the :mere wish to have i t . Ye t , i t is rer!".s.rlcable tha t one
mRn should, as i t nere , have turned an ent i re s ta te into a new
direct ion; that nne man should have solved an in ternal problem
of misery, recognized the need of industry, provided the means
.for at ta in ing i t , even descending to the de ta i l of direct ing
what was to be exported and what was not. Small wonder tha t
the Greekx invested the character of thei r 2;reat lawgivers withan element of the divine.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 59/96
-59-
Notes .:!12 Chapter Three
1) Glover, rr.R., D e m ~ c r a c y in the Ancient World, pp. 46 and 47.
2) Ath. Const. , Editio Princeps of Kenyon, introd. p. XXV.
3) Ib id . , note on p. 15.
4) Greenidge, op. c i t . , p. 150.
5) Halliday, op. c i t . , p. 186.
6) Grote, George., History o f _ ~ r e e c e , Vol. 1 , p. 584.
7) Encyclopedia Bri t tanica , 14th edi t ion , vol. 20. , p. 954-6.
8) Glover in his Democracy in the Ancient World takes a firmhand against the idea of complete cancel la t ion.
9) Ath. Const. , chap. 6.
0) Plut. Sol, chap. 15.
1) Thucydides, bk. ~ . XL. 2.
2) Plut. Solon, chap. 15.
3) Gardner Percy (History of A n c i e n ~ C o i ~ ~ ~ , ) pp. 143-153, asquoted in Hall iday 's Growht of the i ty State .
4) Om.qn, C. W., I i istory of Grer3ce in t h ~ History of NationsSeries , Vol. 2, p. 104.
5) Plut . Sol . , chap. 22.
6) Ibid . , chap. 24.
7) Ib id . , chap. 24.
8) Barket, E ., Greek Pol i t ica l Theor.z, p. 43.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 60/96
CHAPTER IV
POLITICAL REFORMS.
Part I--The Solonian Census.
-60-
"But, even af te r the ancient evidence has been s i f ted wit
every care, any account of Solon's const i tut ional reforms 1m1s
contc.in judgments which are subjective and deductions which
are hazardous, and no synthesis can claim with confidence to
be t rue in every part ." (1) With th is dis t ress ing statement
does Professor Adcock enter into his treatment of the Solonia
const i tu t ional reforms. And Professor Adcock is substant ia l l
correct in his asser t ion. "vYe have already touched upon the
fact that l a te r t rad i t ion , in i t s effor t to honor Athen's
greatest lawgiver, constantly tended to a t t r ibu te to his laws
and reforms of every descr ipt ion, which ei ther already exis
ted before his time or v.rere added af te r his work was done. Yet
in spi te of the fac t that vve cannot claim with confidence
to be r5.ght in "every par t" , there is much which can be put
forward without fear of serious contradiction.
As is frequent in dealing with th is period, the basis of
the di f f icul ty l i es in the fact that Solon is the f i r s t l i fe
and blood f igure we possess of ear ly Greek his tory. Others,
whether as classes or individuals , we may know by name and
even, to a cer ta in degree, by achievement, but in the l a s t
analysis , t he i r forr.1s are shadowy and uncerta' ln. The same,
to a large degree, may be said not only of persons but also
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 61/96
-51-
of ins t i tut ions . As a consequence, we are constantly faced
with the prospect of dealing with a reformer, when we have
scant knowledge of who or what there was to reform.
We shal l divide th is section of our thesis into four
parts , a) the classes of cit izens; b) the Areopagus; c) the
Council; d) the Assembly. Each of these points wil l be sub-
divided fur ther into two par ts , namely, the s i tuat ion as
Solon found i t and the changes which he made in i t .
Let us e«amine into the question of the four classes in-to which Solon is supposed to have placed the ci t izens of
Attica. Of this Aristot le speaks as follows. "He made a
division of a l l ra t iable property into four classes , just as
i t had been divided before, namely, Pentacosiomedimni,
Knights, Zeugitae and Thetes • . . • • To thowe who ranked as
Thetes he gave nothine but a place in the assmbly and in
the jur ies. A man had to rank as a Pentacosiomedimns i f he
made, from hiw ovm land, five hundred measures, whether
l iquid or sol id. Those ranked a Zeugitae who made two hun-
dred measures, l iquid or solid. Those ranked as Knights who
made three hundred measures, or, as some, say, those who were
able to m ~ i n t a i n a horse •••• . • Those ranked a Zeugitae who
made two hundred measures, l iquid or sol id . The res t ranked
as Thetes and were not l ig ib le for any off ice." (2)
Plutarch r s word.s are, "Next Solon, being will ing to con-
t inue the magistracies in the hands of the r ich man and yet
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 62/96
. .-62-
receive the people into the other part of the government,
took an account of the c i t izens ' estates , and thos·e tha t
were worth five hundred measures of f ru i t s , dry and l iquid ,
he placed in the f i r s t rank, cal l ing them Pentacosiomedimni;
those that could keep a horse, or were v10rth three hundred
measures, were named Hippada Teluntes and formed the second
class ; the Zeugitae; that had two hundred measures, were in
the th i rd; and a l l the others were called Thetes, who were
not adm_itted to any off ice but could came to the assembly
and act as jurors . At f i r s t , th is l a t t e r point seemed no
th ins , but was afterwards found to be an enormous privi lege.n
(3)
Did, then, these classes exis t before the time of Soion?
Plutarchdefini te ly
assigns the division to Solon; Aristot leon the other hand, describes the classes as pr ior to Solon.
The question is fur ther complicated by the fact tha t Harpoc
ra ion in two instances expressly ci tes .1. r i s to t le 's very con
stit"L:tion of Athens for h is authori ty tha t the divion was
m ~ d e by Solon. To add s t i l l more to the confusion the Con
s t i tu t ion of Athens, in the much-disputed fourth chapter,
1vhich we referred to in chapter one, makes mention of f ines
which varied in size dependent upon whether the culpr i t was
a Pentacosiomedi1nnis, a F ~ i g h t or a Zeugites. An addi t ional
complication is the fact tha t the papyris on which the Con
s t i tu t ion was found cer ta inly antedates the work of Harpo-
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 63/96
..63-
crat ion.
rrhe s i tuat ion, then, is as follows:- Aristot le twice de
clares that the classes existed before Solon's t ime; Plut
arch defini te ly assigns t he i r creation to Solon; Harpocration
on two occasions claims Aristot le as his authori ty tha t Solon
·was responsible fol'' the i f formation. Obviously the :9roblem
cannot be resolved on the basis of authori t ies . Any ef for t
towards composing these differences must be made relying
ei ther on external evidence of some sor t or through the ap
pl ica t ion of some hypothesis tha t v:il l , a t most, give only a
presumptive cert i tude.
The Cambridge Ancient History (4) in one place a t leas t
would.seem to draw from the external evidence of a known
mil i ta ry reorganization.before the time of Solon and suppose
tha t , in th is regard, a property qualif icat ion was establishec
the pur:9ose of which was m i l i t a r ~ r ra ther than f i sca l . For
some reason not stated only three classes would be asigned
to the pre-Solonian period. 11Hippeis, those who serve as
horeemen; Zeugitae, those who could equip themcelves fo r the
hopl i e. phlaiL"C; and Thetes, or laborers . 11However, the in
formation vouchsafed us by the author is so meagre tha t i t
is impossible to determine the grounds for his asser t ions .
So much for the external evidence. As fo r thehypothesis
to reconcile the confl ict ing renarks, ·we wish to offer the
following, which several authors seer.1 to imply in the i r
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 64/96
-64-
t rea tment of the quest ion. The names Hippeis , Zeugitae and
Thetes are a l l ·what vre may conveniently ca l l 11uncoined 11 names
or , in other l ' tords, ns.mes Vlhich have a place in a lan,?;U.age
apar t frcrn the teci1nlcal sense to vvh:tch, fo r ins tance , Solon
' " - ! : ) P ~ 5 c d them.. Per::u:tps, it vii l l be c l e a re r if . we compare them
with the four th name in the group, Pentacosiomedilrni, which i s
obviously a coined word, one de l ibe ra te ly formed to ex:9ress a
t echn ica l :rneaninc.
1.'.'h8.t v1e sh01).ld sny, t hen , i s t ha t t ~ J . e no.mes I·Ii:n:0eis,
Zeu,::-;i tae and Thetes existed before Solon 1 s t ime, \Vi thout havinr;
hor1ever, any connect ion with a : Jo l i t ica l sic;nif icance or with
t.he :rJrecise number of bushels of s ra in which would en t i t l e a
nerson to be l abe l led with one of them. In th i s case Solon
YJ01J.ld s imr;ly have adopted th ree names already used as soc ia l
tac;s (rrn1cl1. as the modern I t a l i an 11 8avagl iere 11 Cor Y.nic;ht) and
invested them with a pecuniary and ::->olit i c a l meaning. Fj_nding
t h ~ : 1 . t the croup loosely d8signated as ~ I i p p e i s contained men of
varying decrees of weal th , Solon simply divided o ff the
' : 'ea.ltb.iest and r;ave them the naqe rrllic1.1 vms the bas is of h is
rHvis ion, namely, PentacosiomedimnL
At any r a te , th i s much is certs . in , t ha t Solon s t r ipped
the ar i s tocra t s of t he i r automatic qua l i f i ca t ion for of f ices
:tn the s t a t e . For the fu tu re , b i r th vrould not suff ice fo r e l i -
c : ib i l i ty to perform the highes t funct ions of c;overnment. On
the other hand, men who previously hr,d to be content vli th
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 65/96
-65-
minor of f i ces , o r , pcri1aps, with no off ice a t a l l , but v7ho,
because of t he i r f inanc ia l s tanding, f e l t j us tL ' : ed in cla im
ing sone -orominence in the state · , ·;vro nO\'! not only elic;F)le
:fo::::> off ice but also vested with as much e l i , : , ib i l i ty as the
~ ~ i s t o c r a c y by b i r th .
rr1:'w bas i s ot di s t inc t ion bet1"leen the. classes and tl'..e con
sequent Y)Olitical privilerc;es bestovJed on each c.re s\.:;_fficientl:T
J n ~ l i c s , t e d L1 the quoto..tions and need no fu r the r a r . ~ p l i f i c a t i o nhere .
Severa l poin t s , hmJever, may be of i n t e re s t . In the
f i r s t :9lace, the nedimnus, the measure employed fo r gra in t
conta ined about one c.nd o. 7:1alf bushels ; the ~ " ' . e t r e t r e s , used
fo r vrine and o i l , contained a little :r1ore the.n eigh t and one
' Ja lf e;al lons. I t i s notevwrthy the.t in Solon 1 s day a metre tes
of o i l and a med5_mnus of r ~ ; r a i n VI ere considered eq_uivalen t in
value . In the f i f t h c m1tury, hoviever, a r1etr•etew of o i l h2.d·
abo-,.lt the fo·,Irtimew the value of a medir:mus of gro.in. I t
fol lows, t he re fore , t h a t gra in a t the t ime of the reform cos t
a t l eas t four t imes as rmch a s it did in the day sof :Pericles .
I t also ind ica tes the riisdom of Sol0!1 1 s i:o1s iotonce on the cu l -
t iva io:v1 of t:::·.e o l i vo. I f in J?ericlem:1 Ath,:ms, o i l :n•oduced
a t h o ~ e had four t i ~ o s the value of : rP in , ~ ~ i c h , to a la rge
t0cm the '1:'1.11 ·who had ::-1one somuch to st l11ulate the product ion
of suc!.'l o. l uc ra t ive C0,..:1.rJOdity.
Later on we sha l l take up the i:::;;.portance to the Thetes
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 66/96
-66-
of the r igh t which Solon gave them of taking t he i r places in
the assembly. For the present we shal l close th is q u e s t ~ o nwith a quotat ion from Halliday which admirably S l l i ~ S up the
sisnif icance of the Solonian census.
"The new arrangements are clear ly very im:portant and \ r l l l
have far-reaching ef fec ts , for it introduces an ent i re ly new
into the const i tu t ion . I t is quite :probably tha t ,
a t the time of 5.ts introduction, i t s fu l l sic;nificance vms
hardly appreciated for no doubt the m ~ j o r i t y of the already
rul ing class were also the r ich. But in rea l i ty it provides
fo r the pol i t i ca l re:prescntation of wealth. I f the r ich noble
is archon, he is now e l i s ib le fo r that off ice not because he
is noble but because he is r ich , and any member of the nww
merchant class , whose income reaches the prescribed amount,
wil l have a const i tut ional rit;l:ct, whatever his or ig in , to
hold the h i < ~ e s t office in the s ta te . Previously to the
Solonian c lass i f ica t ion : : ;ol i t ical privilege had been the -:Jrivi
lese of bir th ; Solon rnade i t the privi lege of wealth and in
trodv.ccd the principle · of determininG the ci t izen r s obl i
:.::;utions and ]!rivilcr;cs in :r-reps.rat:to:1 to hs i "stake in the
country 11 .(5)
The ATIEOPAGUS.
I t vlil l be i:::>:.possible here to t race the his tory of the
AreoiJac;aus. So many are the conf l ic t ing opinions tnat con-
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 67/96
-67-
jectures as to i t s origin and powers before Solon tha t a whole
thesis could easi ly be written from the l i te ra ture on the sub
ject . We shal l be sat isf ied with a summary of what seems to
us to be a reasonable view of i t s nature and development. A
two-fold question :rrt.1.st be c onsfdered. Was the Areophagus ori -
: ina l ly a deliberat ive body and thus, the direct progenitor of
the l a te r Boule or was the Boule already constituted before the
Solonfan period.
Pract ical ly a l l the Grecian s ta tes passed through a
period of const i tut ional development in which a kine or su
preme magistrate of some sor t was supported by a council of
nobles which acted in an advisory capacity and, in varying
degrees, l imited the power of the ruler . From analogy i t
seems reasonable tha t Athens passed through such a s ta te of
development. We know tha t a t Athens even before the time
of Solon there existed an executive body of some kind, tho '
even ancient authori t ies cannot agree on whether i t was what
was l a te r called the Areopagus or i\'hether i t consisted of a
separate deliberat ive body recruited from the nobi l i ty .
In this regard, Herodotus connects vdth the conspiracy of'
Colon certain s ta te officers called 11 Prytaneis of the N a u c r a r i ~Some authors have t r ied to prove tha t these Prytaneis were com-
mittee members of a Boule just as the Prytaneis of l a te r
Athenian his tory. However, Herodotus seemB clear ly to indi
cate tha t these Prytaneis were an executive, not a del ibera-
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 68/96
-68-
t ive body, a point which should be suff ic ient to distinguish
them from the Pryteneis of l a ter centuries. Again, Athenian
t radi t ion is consistent in at t r ibut ing the Boule to Soloh.
I t ispointed out , moreover, that the
l a t e rBoule, unlike
other very ancient bodies, observed no archaic r i tuals or ce
remonies. Furthermore, i t was convened, not by the archons
whose office is of admitted ant iqui ty, but by a committee of
Pr.:rtaneis, the ear l i es t traces of which are found in the s ixth
century.
Eliminating an early Boule, such as tha t founded by Solon
there remains the Areopagus for which the evidence as a de
l ibera t ive and judic ia l body is bohh extensive and convincing.
I t is true tha t there was current in l a t e r Athenian history a
t ra i t ion that the Areopagus was the creation of Solon, but the
arr;t'!.ments on the other side are two weighty to acL'TI.it of much
dispute.
Frrs t of a l l , concurrently with the above mentioned
t radi t ion, even as early as the beginning of the f i f th cen
tury there was always a feeling of respect, veneration and
even awe connected with the Athenian's view of the Areopagus.
This can hardly be explained as aris ing from that council 's
duty of adjudicating cases of homicide. Again, Plutarch (6)
expressly mentions a decree of Solon in which the Areopagus
is expressly credited vrith having already sent persons into
exi le . Besides, there is the convincing circumstance tha t
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 69/96
-69- ...
in the t i ~ : 1 e of Aris to t l e , the Areopas-us !11e t in the King's
Porch under the pres id(mcy of the King }.I•cho:t:., v;ho was the
d i r e c t successor of the or ig ina l Att ic kings . Add to t h i s
t: 'lat the Areopagus is 8.1\JVf:l,ys design8.ted not as a cour t but as
a Boule OI' counci l o.nd r:e can sc"fel::,r c..ssert (1) tho.c the Areo-
:>c.t;us v:as in exis tence before Solon; (2) t1:u:.,.t. i t i'.'8.2 t ; ~ : . c de l i -
r-)ers.tive as well as a jud ic ia l assembly (7)
!:.r:Lstot1e 1 s v;ords c onfirlil th i s tvJO-fcld conch;.sion.
"'l'he Council ::..eel o.s i t s as::li.:_;ned duty the : ; ro tect ion of the
la...-:s, but in point of fac t it o . c 1 Y : i l : . . i s t e r ~ d the cre£>tcst and
~ o s t imnortant nar t of the- - - - r"OVei'Y"''ent !!""! .... • ( 8) And l abe r t a l l ~ -ing about Solon 's reforms he s 87f8, "0ut ~ ' l e still ass igned to
t inued , as before , to be the [)J.e.rdian of the co:nsti t u t ion in
: ;encral . ( 9)
\ll.:..at changes, then_, did Solon nuke in .Jcb.e . ! ~ r e o ~ J a G u s ?
A.s vre saw in our introd.uctory clJ.apter, the Areopac:us vms, be-
fo re , Solon, composed of ex-archons. This Solon l e f t un-
chanc;cd. But Yre also saw t ha t the archons a t t h a t t ime were
chosen by the Are ~ ; o . g u s and only f r o ~ , n · ~ , 1 e n t}Ualified by b i r t h .
rr:1is Solon d id change. From no\Y on the Archons vrere chosen by
the people and weatth ra the r than :J ir th vras the bas is of
t he i r qua l i f i ca t ion . In th i s way, h t ebroke the closed
c i rc le of po l i t i c a l cont ro l tb.a;!; ex is ted in both the Areo-
:)agus., the m.ost i n f luen t i a l body in the s t a t e , and in the
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 70/96
-70-
archonsJ.lip, the r1ost i n f luen t i a l inclivid"Lml off ices in the
body :POlitic. Thus, in c. very roa l sense , the Areopagus of
the fu ture wc..s to represen t i nd i rec t ly the choice of the
~ " ) G o p l e a t lccrge.
The BOUJJE.
Having de}.Jrived the Areopagus of i t s f\:mctiom as a
del ibera t ive body 9.nd boinc; on the po in t of es te .bl i shing a
de l ibe ra t ive body composed of a l l the c i t i zens , Solon had to
make iJrov5.sion to prevent th i s ~ ~ o ~ 1 u l a r assembly from fa l l ing
from the complete control of the archons, the hie;J:-.test ad
minis t ra t ive of f i c i a l s of the s ta te . To 1-:-tcet the s i tua t ion ,
Solon crea ted whs.t v.re.s to become one of the most c ~ l a r a c t e r i s -t i c and ')OrJ'Orful bodies in. the po l i t i c a l machinery of Athens.
~ C h i s body, ca l led the Boule, 178.S formed ~ 1 r i r 1 o . r i l y to arrange
and d i r ec t the work of the assembl;sr. I t s funct ion vras pro
boulcut ic in charac ter in so much as it decided on the mat ter
and the ordering of the business of the assembled body of the
c :tt i zens . At th i s t ime, it VJould seem t ha t i t s pm·:ers v1ere
1i:rnited to the 1-:erformo.nce of th i s : function n.nd. t ha t the
i : : - ~ p o r t a n t du t i e s , li].lich l a t e r fe 11 tc ~ - - ; ~ , \7ere not included
in the plan of the founder.
11iJill1en he had cons t i tu ted the ~ ~ r e 0 ) 2 . Q ; u s of those who
had been year ly archons , of which }:e him:::; e l f , the re fore , was
al ' r ! G ~ : ' ' b c r ,
obs ervins tha. t the people , now f ree from t h e i r
debts , were u_nsettled and imperious, he formed another coun-
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 71/96
c i l of four hundred,· se l ec t ing a hundred out of each of the
four t r ibes . - I t was the duty of the counci l to inspec t a l l
matters before they were propounded to the r>eople and to
tal:::e care t ha t nothing but vvhat had been f i r s t assembled
should be brought before the o;eneral asse:nbly. 11( 10)
Several deta i l s meri t our cons idera t ion . As we saw
above, off ices in the s ta te were not open to the Thetes and,
consequent ly, th is counci l nru.st have consis ted of men who
could , a t l e a s t , ncct the qual i f i ca t ion of Zeugitae. Since
th i s i s the case , it i s hard to understand hov; wri te rs use
the in s t i tu t ion of th i s body to bulr;Hrk t h e i r content ion
t ha t Solon formed it del iberate ly as a movement towards de-
1-:10cracy. Plutarch indica tes express ly t ha t it was to a.ct
as a check on the general assembly and keep in bounds people
who were now "unse t t led and :j_mperius. 11
As to the method of e lec t ion to th i s body or the
leng th of time i t s members re:c:1.ained in off ice we hc..ve no
def in i t e knowledge whatever. The f i r s t counci l , i f the vrord
ing of the t ex t i s to be taken l i t e r a l l y , was chosen by Solon
personal ly . In the lQter democracy the members were chosen
by I o t , but we hc.ve no def in i t e asnurance of i7hs..t the pro-
cedure was during the l ;oriod fol lowing in11nedia t e ly upon
Solon.
This par t of the thes i s would laclc completeness i f we
did not mention Solon's concept t ha t the Areopagus and the
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 72/96
-72
Council or Boule vrere to ac t as rr anchors 11 and thus nthe com
monwealth would be less l i ab l e to be tossed by tumults and
the people be J'10re quiet . " (11) Jus t how fa r the Council
served i t s purpose as an "anchorn of the s t a t e , it i s not our
in tent ion to discuss . Never theless , i t s ingenuity nm.s t be
a c ~ m o v v l e d s e d . Situated as it was between the large and un-
vdeldy body of the popular assembly and the imi)Ortant of
f i c i a l s of the Areopagus and archonship, it cannot but have
civen a fee l ing of secur i ty and protec t ion to the genera l i ty
of Athenians. The w e a l t ~ y may readi ly have conceiv-ed it r'. S
a safeg-u.ard fo r thesmeves by reason of i t s exclusion of the
1m7est class in the Athenian census. The poor, regarding the
1o.rc;e nv..:mber the.t formed the Council r s membership, may eas i ly
have deemedit
as a guarantee agains t a re turn to the harsh
condit ions from which t h e i r l ibera t ions had so recent ly been
ef fec ted .
The ASSEMBLY.
Of Solon r s achievement ' :!ith respect to the genera l
assembly, very l i t t l e d i rec t evidence is given us . Both
Aris to t le and Plutarch a re content vri th the unelaborated
asser t ions t ha t Solon opened the ecc les ia to a l l Athenian
freemen. vVhether nn ecclesia of some kind was already in
exis tence v1e cannot know with cer t a in ty . I f such a group
did e x i s t , we can be cer t a in tha t i t s power was severe ly
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 73/96
. . ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,-'!73•
l imited. Perhaps it was convened only to gain the support
of the comrnons in the event of war or some other such event
of national importance.
A suggestion, ho·wever, is found in the comparison Plu-tarch makes between Poplicola and Solon. rrThe remission of
debts was peculiar to Solon; i t was his great means for con-
firming the c i t izens ' l iber ty; for a mere law to t,ive a l l men
equal r ights is useless , i f the poor must sacr i f ice these
r ights to the i r debts and be more than a n ~ ~ h e r e at the beck
and bidding of the rich in the very seats and sanctuaries
of equali ty, the courts of jus t ice , the offices of s ta te
and the public discussions.u(l2)
The i ~ o l i c a t i o n is clear that Solon together with his
cancellation of debts , added a law 11 to give a l l men equal
r ights . t These equal r ights were exercised in three ways,
by a part icipat ion in the courts , in the election of magis-
t ra tes and in the public discussions. These public discus-
sions would be, of course, the meetings of the ecclesia .
We can be certain that the ecclesia , i f i t ex1.sted at
a l l before the reforms, had l i t t l e or no influence in the
management of the govern.111ent. We have all"'eady shovm that up
to that time control was vested in the Areopagus and the
archons. Besides, an inf luent ia l assembly might by i t se l f
have forced action to ameliorate the grevious conditions of
the masses. Yet, af te r the time of Solon we hear no men-
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 74/96
-74-
t ion of·· anyone as founder of a new ecclesia . Surely, such
a momentous step would have cal led for considerable corrnnent.
We can, therefore, assume that the ecclesia, as an important
deliberat ive body, came into being under the guiding hand
of Solon.
I t is a temptation, of course, to credi t Solon with
the authority of a l l the powers which that body la te r came
to exercise. We can feel confident, however, tha t these
powers were of slow accretion. Indications of th is are
found in la te r Athenian history where we see how the balance
of power shif ted from one arm of the government to the other.
A long time was s t i l l to elapse before the assembly deve
loped i t s technique even to the point of making i t knovmto
the Boule t ~ ~ t certain matters might agreeable be included
in :the·assembly's agenda. At leas t Solon can take credi t for
giving a tremendous iwpetus to the collect ive importance of t e
Athenian commons. This step l ike so many for which Solon was
responsible was to assume i t s fu l l significance only in the
days when Athens reachedi t s fu l l
s ta ture as a real demo-cracy.
The HELIAEA.
In the Wasps of Aristophanes, Philocleon enters the
. Heliaea and cries out, "Is not my :;::>ower as great as that of
any king?(l3) This remark intended though i t is as a j ibe
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 75/96
• '75-
a t the Athenians' passion for the give and take of the law
court , i t pregant with meaning. Underlying i t is the solemn
t ru th that a t Athens the law court , nowithstanding numerous
abuses connected with i t , :h..a.d become the very cornerstone
ofAthenian democracy. Aristot le, the keenest mind that
Athens was to give to the world, saw i t tha t way and with his
usual pit iness sums up the content of his vision with the
words, · "for when the connnons is master of the juryman's
bal lo t , i t is mater of the s ta te ." (14) To Solon nru.st go the
credit for leading the way to th is characterist ic of Athenian
nat ional l i f e . Men of his day could s t i l l recal l the time
when laws were expounded and just ice rendered by a clique of
aris tocra t ic magistrates whose decisions were not only f inal
but also basedon
laws of which they alone had theknowledge
and over which they alone held the mastery. Men could s t i l l
recal l the momentous work of a Draco whose t i t l e to fame
rested chiefly on his having la id open to the masses those
principles of justice under which they might receive an un
merciful chastisement. Draco's work was rather a gesture
that a movement in the r ight direct ion. The administration
of just ice remained where i t had been and the r ight of appeal
was s t i l l a matter of dreanw.
We cannot but have noticed tha t the pol i t ica l reforms
of Solon were more j_n the direct ion of timocracy than demo-
cracy. Wealth was the key to off ice and poverty gave access
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 76/96
·, '
only to the l imi ted funct ions of an i n e x p e r ~ e n c e d assembly.
I t was a t most a caut ious s tep .in the way of univer sa l equal
i t y . But , if th e po l i t i ca l reforms were but a cautious s t ep ,
the j ud ic ia l reforms s ta red democracy in the face .
Let us se t down the words of Ari.stotlG and l ' l , " t c . r c ~ J . .
"rrhere s re three :Doints in the c.onstitl-'.tion of Solon 17hich app
ear to ~ t s nost d c ~ o c r ~ t i c fea tures ; f i r s t and most impor-
t an t , the prohibi t ion of loans on the securit7r of the debtors
2.'erson, secondly, the ri,:sht of every person who so wil led to
bring an act ion in behalf of n.n-yone to YJllOm Y:rong 17as being
done; thLxU:;•, the j_nst i tu. t ion of the ap:)eal to the lav;
cour t s ; and it i s by nouns of th i s l a s t t ha t the:;• ~ a y the
masses have sained s t rength noat of a l l , nince , when the com-
rnons is . - ~ a s t e r of the jurynanrs b a l l o ~ . : ; , it i s ' ~ ? s . s t e r of . the
s ta te . " (15)
"Solon sppears to :lD.vo r ; s t c . l J l i s ~ e d t ~ : : c C:.c:rocrac;y- by com-
TiOS ing the jury courts out of a l l the c i t i zens .11
(H i )
nsolon seems . • . • to havo ra i sed the r·eOI)le to E;reCl.t con-
s ide ra t ion in the s t ~ t e by al lot t inG thG s u ~ r e m e - j u d i c i a l
done v;:hat vrould soon overtt1..rn th8.t l ) r ~ l c , n c e of power he inten-
cled to es tab l i sh , c ince by tr:sdne; a l l c a ~ e:::. ':rl.i.r. t::: oover before
tJ::.e 2 ; e o : ~ · J _ e who ·were cl1osen by 1ot to determine ther.1 1 it vms
necessary to f l a t t e r a t y r a n n ~ c a l p o ~ ' u l a c e \'JllO had got th i s
povrer, whlch c o n t : . . ~ 5 . b u t o d to brine; tb.e covern::::J.ent to tha t pure
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 77/96
dm .locracy it is novl." (17)
".li.J.J.d a l l the others were ca l led Thetes , who were not ad.-
mJ . tteCl to a n ~ r off ice but could cmne to the assembly and ac t as
jurors . This r i gh t to s i t as a juryman as t i f r . s t seemed
noth:tng, but aftcrv:E..r'ds i t turned out to be c..n enorl'lot:s : . ~ r i v i -
lo ;o , rrs al1:1ost 0very m.at t e r of ctis:;ute ca:::.c b0:C'orc them in
th i s co..:r:aclty. Even in the cases Which he ass isned to the
nrchon 's cot,".l.izance, he r ~ l l o y ; e d an nr:;;eal to the cour ts .n( l8)
"r!e, Solon t}:ou::{J':'.tit
intieed mont necessary to ent rus t the
=:;eo1)le v7i th the cll.oice of t he i r ~ ~ ' 8 . 2 : ; i 3 t r a t os and the :r:ower of
call: tne t21en to account ." ( l9)
Let us take up in order the j ud ic ia l r ights which Solon
eave to the 9eople. F i r s t of a l l , he l a id the foundat ion
fo r t ha t extreme ind ividuo.lisnJ. ::'.n tlle a d : : , 1 i n ~ . s t : ~ • c . t i o n of jus-
t ico ' tLdch D . ~ : : . , o ~ J . r s so stril::ing to onr eyes. ~ ' \ . s Glotz puts it 1
11 jus t ice never tool: the ~ . n i t i a t i v e a:c:"ong the !•.thenj_ans, even
in cr iminal cases . 11 (20) In other words, there exis ted in
Athens no ymblic 9rosecutor , no orc;anizod pol i t ce force. The
o t ~ e r s of these was occupied by every indiv idual c i t i zen of
Athens. The inves t iga t ion o.nd )'Lmishxnent of 17rongdoing vms
not regarded as the business of a pol ice d o r ~ r t ~ e n t , u i t ~ the
ci t izens looking on o . ~ ' c . . thet ico, l ly , c..lrnost o.s i f tb.e funct ion
in;::; of such a d e ~ ; a r t m e : 1 t absolved thcr1 fr•o:-n a l l i n t e re s t and
res] : ;onsibi l i ty . Crime 1vas not considered so 1m1ch a violo.t ion
of an abs t rac t code of laws as a viola t ion of the r igh t s of
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 78/96
',
' -.-;'78- '
the c itj_zens l?.:nd in t h i s vio la t ion each indiv idual f e J t c.
:oersonal cone ern.
Thr011,2;hout th i s considerat ion we must not fo rget t ha t the
Heliaert was OlJCn to a l l c i t izens including those :!.n. the
lo,•rest cens-c.s. 'JitJ1 t : . ~ _ i s in mind, ne shEl l consider the im-
portance of the legislD.t ion vrhich com.:?elJ.od a l l nac i s t r a te s ,
a t the t e l - . ~ n i r r a t j _ o n of t he i r tenure of of f i ce , to render em
r.ccount of t he i r nde",lirristro.t:i_oD. Of t tds Grote rer1o.rks, "To
j_:;1:nose u ~ ) O D the Ru:n.::.trid Archon the necess i ty of being
elec ted to :nut 11210n th i s t r i a l of a f t e r - a c c o u n t a b i l ~ t y by the
rabble o:L freemen (such would be the phrase in Eupatr id
socie ty ) would be a b i t t e r 1-rc•.n5.lintion to those a:mong whom it
'.Ve,s f i r s t int roduced; for rre l"'V.st reco l lec t t ha t th i s was the·
most extensive scheme of cons t i tu t iona l refor::n ye t propounded
in Greece, and t ha t despots and olig2.rchies shc.red bet·ween
them a t tha t time the whole Grecian vrorld.n (21) 1.7hite th i s
examination befol"'e c. lo.rc;e body of ·che CO'!T::1ons 1:1ay not have
assuned th e iml!Orto.nce rti:J.icb. flirJ. in the f i f t h century , ·Jet
~ ~ - tca
.
nrrot buth ~ v e
been a r>ovrerful deter rent fro,,, any f l ag -
nm t abuse of pov1er. Examinetin:1 by a popul2.r boc.y before
which any c i t i zen :r1i,sht lay his , ·] ievnnces Cf:l.1121ot have been
a pleccsant experience a t e.ny t ime.
In th i s connection vre must not f a i l to mention the a l l -
i:tT!}orto.nt quest ion of c onst i t1..1tion.o.lity. Gi ve:n the r i gh t
to t ry cases of every c .escr i r t ion , the co-r:ll';',Ons v1ere, thereby 1
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 79/96
-'79
with the right of interpreting the consti tution. For,
or la te r , cases were bound to arise the adjudication of
would depend upon the jurists • understanding of the
of the law involved. Thus , Solon, perhaps unlmowingly
ad in i t ia ted a most star t l ing democratic trend. In the las t
the commons, through the i r courts of law, when a t
they become conscious of their preogatives, were to ex
a control over the very constitution to which they owed
judicial powers. Greenidge's remarks are to the point.function o:f the courts here charactel .ized as democratic
s that of the audit of magistrates, and the judgment is but an
of the maxim that the character of the consti
wil l never correspond to the character of the nominal
i f judicial functions (including pol i t ica l jur is
are given to another body for the sta te will always
e swayed by the classes represented in the judicial body."
No doubt many nations of antiquity gave a subject the
of appealing from the decision of a lesser off ic ia l
o the judgment of a higher, perhaps even to that of the chief
or king. However, as far as we know, not even th is
in Attica a t the time of Solon's archonship.
i t is amaxing to find Solon laying down the principle
of appeal but actually of appeal to general courts
even the lowest class in Attica was admitted to par t i -
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 80/96
-89·
cipation. Plutarch expressly states that this privilege in
cluded even decisions rendered by the Archon. I t is hard to
believe that Solon himself understood the ful l import of this
momentous step which was to culminate in a judicial proced
ure in Which the archons would do no more than preside a t a
preliminary t r i a l while competence in the case was entirely
in the hands of the popular c ou.rts. I t is not an exager
ation t o cal l this a t rue revolution in the judicial proce
dure of the western world. I f Solon did not fully grasp whatthe f inal issue of his measure would be, yet , that issue was
inevitable and inherent in the original provision which he
made.
Finally, we liDlSt notice that this judicature was a body
separate in every way from every other department of the
state . I t was not the assembly for this l a t ter body was not
chosen by lo t as were the courts. (23) In the second place
the members of the assembly did not take the Heliastic oath
to Which the jurors bound themselves. Besides, the courts
could exercise jurisdiction over and decide the constitution
al i ty of the very decrees of the assembly.
I t wil l be interesting at the close of th is chapter to
quote several very pointed observations of Greenidge. "That
state only is a pure democracy in which no other principle
but that of equal representation c l a ~ s legal recognition.
As a mater of fact such a pure democracy did not exis t in
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 81/96
-81-
Greecei in a l l we see certain aristocratic or oligarchic ele
preserved. Yet, the state was democratic Where the t rue
character of such elements was modified by subordination to
the popular wil l , which could cr i t ic ise and punish a l l holders
of office. This is indeed the practical meaning of democracy
1n the Greek world; i t is a power of fearless criticism which
can at any moment issue 1n action" (24) "Democracy, as we
saw means practically though not ideally the power of cr i t i -
cism and punishment by the masses; this power was exercised
at Athens through the popular courts, and by their inst i-
tution Solon was (perhaps unwittingly) responsible for a
star t l ing democracit reform." (25)
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 82/96
Notes to Chapter Four
1) Adcock, F. E., Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 4, P• 47
2) Ath. Const., chap. 7.
3) Plut. Sol. , chap. 18.
4) Cambridge Ancient Historz, vol. 3 , p. 594.
5) Halliday, op. c i t . , pp. 121 and 122.
6) Plut. Sol. , chap. 19.
7) This summary is drawn from the treatment given to thisquestion in the Cambridge Ancient History.
8) Ath. Const., chap. 3
9) Ath. Const., chap. a.
0) Plut. Sol. , chap. 19.
1) Ibid.
2) Plut . , Comparison of Solon and Poplicola, chap. 3.
Aristoph., Wasps, 549.
4) Ath. Const., chap. 9.
5) Ibid.
6) Arist. Pol. , i i . 12.
7) Arist. Pol. i i . 12
8) Plut. Sol. , chap. 18
9) Arist. Pol. , 11. 12.
0) Glotz, G., !a! Greek Citz, P• 233.
1) Grote, History of Greece, Vol. 1 , p. 596.
2) Greenidge, op. c i t . , P• 153.
3) Arist. Pol. , i i . 12.
4) Greenidge, op. ci t . P• 123
5) Ibid. • 154
-82
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 83/96
-83-
CHAPTER FIVE
... ..S;;..;C=E=LL-.ANE---......,0...-U....,S ~ . ! @ CONCLUDING REMARKS
Sedition Laws:-
I t is not our intention here to quarrel over
the genuineness of the so-called Sedition Law. SUffice i t to
say that both Aristotle {1) and Plutarch (2) makes mention of
i t and that this points to a well-established t radit ion. More
over, the very simplicity of i ts provisions gives_, is a So
lonian colouring. The eidence is satisfactory enough, and, inl ieu of any testimony contradicting i t , we can proceed to a
discussion of this interesting b i t of legislat ion.
What was the Sedition Law? Aristotle will t e l l
us. "Further, since he saw the state often engaged in internal
disputes, while many of the citizens from sheer indifferencewaited to see what would happen, he made a few laws with ex
press reference to such persons, enacting that anyone who in
time of civ i l faction did not take up arms with either party
should lose his rights as a cit izen and cease to have any part
in the s t a t ~ . " {3)
We realize at the outset that th is law could
scarcely have been enfor.med without grave injustice. I t
gave the victorious party too favorable an opportunity of tak
ing revenge under the cover of legitimate judiciary procedure.
Yet, the spi r i t behind such an enactment, the crit icism of the
apathy or the masses together with the implication that loyalt
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 84/96
-84-
to the existing government had not assumed the character of a
national virtue 1 a l l these just ify us 1n lingering on what
Plutarch calls a "peculiar and surprising" piece of legis
lat ion.
Solon, l ike a l l great lawgivers understood the ut ter
necessity of the rule of' order in the sta te . This order was
more essential than the supremacy of' any part icular form of
government over another. Better a tyranny with order than a
democracy with disorder. Now, Solon, perhaps better than
anyone else, realized tha t his legis lat ion, while i t had ef
fected a cure of' the pressing i l l s of' state , had far from
cured these i l l s premanently. or this he te l l s us himself'.
He foresaw that the dissatisfaction of both the commons and
the nobles presaged a recurrence of internal dissentions.Already, he had given the Athenians not the best laws but "the
best they could receive." Contention he could not forestall .
At most he would attempt to impose a measure by which the
period of' contention and i t s conquest disorder might, a t
least , be shortened. At l eas t , he would make a remote pro
vision to insure a speedy return to the most fundamental re
quirement of civic well being, the reign of disorder.
Thus i t was that he legislated against the spi r i t of
laissez faire. His good ci t izen was not to be the men who
kept aloof' from the poli t ical concerns of' the state but one
who was so conscious of membership in the body poli t ic tha t ,
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 85/96
-as
given a "time of civi l faction", he would feel constrained not
only to study the issues, but actually choose a side, even to
the extent of "tbe taking up of arms". In this way the :f'ull
strength of contending part ies might quickly be estimated, so
quickly, i t might be, as to a void a l l bloodshed by indicating
the overwhelming advantage of one over the other.
Myers makes an observation which is much to the point.
"I t is interesting to note that among the measures urged by
modern reformers to correct the evils of modern democracy is
found one, compulsory voting, which in principle is wholly
like the Sedition Law of the Athenian statesman." (4}
One start l ing feature of this law cannot f a i l to impress
us. We should expect that the worthwhile cit izen he urged to
take his stand with the established govermnent, especial ly,when we recal l that , in la ter Athens, cit izens thought them
selves deserving of special consideration in the law courts
i f they could prove that they opposed·the rule of the Thirty
Tyrants. Instead, as Grote puts i t , the existing government
ranked simply as one of the contending parties. (5) The fact
of the matter is that in Solon's day there wasno form of
government which might be accounted the norm for Athenian so-
ciety. Many years had s t i l l to elapse before Athenians con-
sidered themselves as the embodiment of the highest ideal of
democracy.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 86/96
-86-
Lesser Laws:
Since i t wil l be impossible to give even a summary
of a l l the laws attr ibuted to Solon, we shal l be content with
the enumeration of a few of his legislat ive enactments, w h i c h ~though, of less importance than those we have already dis
cussed, are nevertheless sufficiently interesting to merit at
least passing attention.
To afford a larger measure of personal l iberty to
the individual Solon is said to have abrogated the law accord
ing to which the property of a man who died without offspring
passed automatically into the hands of his family. Under the
new enactment such a man obtained the r ight to bestow his
property on whomsoever he wished. This law, then, while pre
serving the rights of the immediate members of the f a m i l y ~established on a broader basis the individual 's control over
his own possessions.
Extravagant tuneral expenses were expressly for
bidden. The exaggerated practices of women mourners were dis
countenances. The general deportment of women in public was
regulated. Provisions were made to insure an adquate water
supply to the small farmer. Fixed rewards were alloted to
victors a t the Isthmian and Olympic games. A bounty was of
fered for the kill ing of wolves. Men were forbidden to speak
evil of the dead and no one might speak evil of the living 1n
the t e ~ l e s , the courts of just ice, the public offices are a t
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 87/96
-87-
the games.
Occupied as we have been with the individual accomplish
ments of Solon, we have had l i t t le opportunity to view his
achievements in their larger aspect, to interprettheir
mean-ing with reference to subsequent Athenian history; more than
that we have been so ingrossed in the works that we have a l l
but forgotten the man. To supply these deficiencies will be
the purpose of these concluding remarks.
I t
was no populace in a gentlemood
that Solon faced whenhe assumed the duties and powers of his office. On the one
hand the wealthy, realizing that their power was seriously
threatened, were willing to make some reasonable concessions,
but, doubtless, their concept of reasonable hardly coincided
with that of the poor. Against these were ranged the poor,
confident in their knowledge of their oppressors fear . We
know that the poorer classes hoped even to r an equal dis t r i -
bution of a l l the country's land. Solon speaks ot them as
follows:
"So theY' came in search of plunder, and their
cravings knew no bounds,Everyone among them deeming endless wealth
would here be found.Fondly then and vainly dreamt they; now they
raise an angry dinAnd they glare askance in anger and the l ight
within their eyesBurns with hostile flames with me." (6)
To face this si tuation required courage. Small wonder that
Solon says,
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 88/96
"Therefore, I took rn:y strength from every sideAnd turned a t bay l ike wolf among the hounds." (7)
A lesser man might have chosen one of two simple and ob
vious courses. He might have aroused ln the rich an unreason
able fear for the security of their persons and the i r property
and st i r red them to crush tne poorly-organized andalmost help
less commons. Followers he would not have lacked and riches
might bave been his for the asking. On the other hand, the
poor were ripe for revolt . Given a leader who would raise
aloft the standard of "stasis" and success was practically
assured. Solon bad within his grasp the power to take into
his own hands the complete control of the state . No one can
contest his words:
nBut had another held the goal as IOne in
whose heart was guile and greediness,He bad kept the people back from s t r i fe ." (8)
He himself describes for us the opinion of his contemporaries
"Solon surely was a dreamer and a man of simple mind;When the gods would give him fortune, he of his own
will declinedWhen the net was fu l l of fishes, over-heavy thinking
i t ,He declined to haul i t up, through want of heart and
want of wit.Had but I the. t chance of riches and of kingship to r
one day ,I would give rrry skin for f i o ~ g i n g and 11'13 house to
die away. (9)
The Cambridge Ancient History offers some interesting
comments on this renunciation. "This, almost the greatest
sacrif ice a Greek could make, crowns the moral dignity of
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 89/96
-89-
is career. But i t may well be doubted i f i t was not really
he "great refusal" , an act which did not serve the best in
of Athens. I t was 1n his own words Solon bad stretched
his stout shield over both parties 1n the state; now the arm
which held the shield was w1 thdrawn. His economic and legal
persisted by their inherent merit: his constitutional
too tentative to do more than make men able to be con·
1 f they were willing. Neither the executive nor the
bad power enough to defend the constitution
a resolute ambition. I t was Athens' fate to try both
to see a tyrant make a strong executive, and a democrat,
i f a nwly converted one, make Athens in practice a democracy.
t was to make two generations and Peisistratus and Cleis
to complete Solon's poli t ical work, andin
those twothere was much loss as well as much gain. That
he gain outweighed the loss was due to the personality of
Athens was fortunate: i t may have lain in
power to make her need no such good fortune. But
great services are certain, his failure hypothetical.His claim to fame rests on his bold ecoomic settlement and
his code which gave the Athenians that respect for law that
steadied them even in the days of their extreme democracy.
Athen's neighbor, Megara, faced such an eco.minic cr is is ,
failed to find a Solon, and the result was f i r s t a red terror
and then a generation of cigio s t r i fe . I f anyone would
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 90/96
-90·
cr i t ic ize Solon, le t him read Theognis on Megara. (10}
Glover calls Solon tbe greatest and f i r s t of Greek econo
mists. (11) The t ruth of th is statement goes unchallenged.
No great acumen is needed to point out post factum that in
following Solon's lead, Athens had acted in the only reason
able manner by which she could care herself a place of pro
minence in the economic l i fe of the Mediterranean. I t was
quite another matter to mold the economic future of a people
that was torn by dissention and harassed by hunger from with-
out and without, was held of twoo l i t t l e account to merit
recognition in the marts of the world of which i t formed a
part . Glover's praise then is tu l ly merited. For Solon
l e f t his impress on the whole of Athen 1s future ecomomic
l i fe .
But Solon's greatest t i t l e to fame l ies in his consti
tutional reforms. Doubtlessly he would have d i s c l a ~ e d the
plaudits of la ter orators and statesmen Who acclaimed htm as
a founder of the democracy. The real democracy began with
Cleisthenes. But, we may seriously question whether Gleis
thenes could ever have achieved success had i t not been for
the accomplishments and even mistakes of his distinguished
predecessor. We mention mistakes advertently, for a t leas t
several of the la ter reformer's most important measures are
directed to correcting defects which Solon's provisions had
failed adequately to take care of. The vote of ostracism i s ,
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 91/96
-91-
af ter a l l , but a more drastic cure for what Solon had failed
to heal with his Sedition Law. The principle underlying both
enactments is the same and Solon must have credit for recog
nizing i t f i rs t ; but, could a tyro assembly have been en-
trusted with the power of ostracism? The ingenious division
into ten tr ibes aimed at sweeping away the narrow dis
t inctions of clan and gens and local i ty. Yet, the barriers
were f i r s t borken down by the substitution of wealth for
bir th in the selection of the officers of state . Let us re
cal l once more the remark of Solon that he had not given
the people the best laws that he could give but the ~ ~they dDuld receive.
Plutarch 1n his comparison between Solon and Poplicola
ranks Solon above the l a t te r in so far as nthe beginning of
his government was more glorious, for he was entirely
original and followed no man's example" but nevertheless "the
close of Poplicola's l i fe was more happy and desirable, for
Solon saw the dissolution of his own commonwealth." And,
t ruly, i f any man has ever seen what. seemed to be a com-plete nullif ication of his labours, that man was Solon. Be
fore his death he witnessed the advent of tyranny against
which he had :rm.de such valiant efforts and which, when i t
was in his grasp, he had refused to take for himself. I t is
impossible to guagehow
far Solon influenced Peiaistratua 1n
the mildness of his policy. At any ra te , Peisistratua gave to
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 92/96
-92-
Solon a magnanimous token of his veneration. When the aging
lawgiver denounced the tyrant and urged the people to vigorous
opposition, Peisistratus repaid his antagonist by so honoring
him, obliging him and sending to see him "that Solon gave him
his advise and approved many of his actions". And we are told
that Peisistratus "retained most of Solon's laws, observed
them himsel.f and compelled his .friends to obey." {11)
In. conclusion, le t us quote a passage from a History of
Poli t ical Ideas. "There have, no doubt, ben times when for ashort period great men and great governments have come near
to being sovereign in that sense--when the people have fe l t
in their hearts that this man or this government was for the
time securing to them something so in.finitely valuable that
he ori t
must be obeyed and maintained in power at almost any
cost, and seeing things in the l ight or that in.finite value,
they recognized that they aught to follow that person or those
persons through thick and thin; so .far and .for that time the
pol i t ica l prlblem is solved •• " (13) Indubitably Solon occu
pied such a position. In his own words:
"Wer 1 t not .for me, the people ne 'er had setTheir eyes upon these blessings e'en in dreams."(l4)
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 93/96
Notes To Chapter £_
1- Ath. Const., chap. 8
2- Plut. Sol. , chap.20.
3- Ath. Const., chap. 8
4 - Meyers, Phill ip Van Ness, The Eastern N a t i o n s ~"Greece, p. 172.
5- Grote, op. c i t . , p. 605
6 - Ath. Const. , chap. 12
7 - Ib id .
8 - Ib id .
9 - Plut. Sol. chap. 14.
10- Cambridge Ancient Historx, vol. 4. p. 58.
11- Glover, T. R., Greek Byways, P• 52.
12--Plut. Sol. , chap. 31
-93-
13--Morris, c. R., and Mary, a History o:r Poli t ical Ideas,P• l57. -
14--Ath. Comst., chap. 12
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 94/96
Barker, Ernest
Bury, J . B .,
Cambridge Ancient History
Cox, George w.
Curtius, Ernest
Mitchell, J . Malcom
Glotz, G.,
Glover, T. R.,
Glover, T. R.,
Greenidge, A. H. J . ,
Grote, George
Grundy, G. B.,
BffiLIOGRAPHY
*****-if-
-94-
Greek Poli t ical T h e o ~ , London,Methuen and Co., Lt . , 1918.
A History of Greece, New York,- Macmi!anand Co., 1931.
New York, Macmillan and Co.,vol. 3 , 1925; vol. 4, 1926.
Lives of Greek Statesman, New
York:-Harper and Brothers,1885.
!a! H i s t o r y ~ Greece, translated by Adolphus WilliamWard, New York, CharlesScribner's Sons, 1886.
Encyclopedia Brit tanica, col.20, 14th ed. , s . v. Solon,New York, Encyclopaedia Britanica, Inc. , 1929.
Greek City, London, Kegan Paul,Trench, Trubner and Co. , Ltd.1929.
Greek Byways, Cambridge, theUniversity-press, 1932.
Democracy in the Ancient World,Cambridge, the UniversityPress, 1927.
A Handbook of Greek Constitu- t iona! His to1 , New York,
Macmillanand o ., 1896.
History of Greece, Chicago,M. A. Donahue Company.
A History of the Greek and Ro- man World," New York, ~ v : -~ e m a n ,
National Book BuyersService, 1925.
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 95/96
Halliday 1 William R.
Kenyon, F. G. 1
Kenyon, F. G.,
Livingstone 1 R. w.
Morris, C. R. and M. M.
Myers, Philip Van Ness,
Oman, c. w.l
Sintenis 1 Carolus
Smith, c. Foster,
-95-
The G r o w t h ~ ~ ~ t y State1
Boston, Small, ynard andCompany, 1923.
Aristotle on the Constitutionof A t h e n s ~ d i t i o Princeps),
New York, Longmans and Co.,1891.
Aristotle on the Constitution~ Athens 1-r t ranslat lon) ,Library of Original Sources,Milwaukee 1 Wisconsin 1 University Research ExtensionCompany, 1911.
The Legan! of Greece, Oxford,Clare on Press, 1923.
A History of Poli t ical Ideas,- London,-christophers, 1924.
The Eastern Nations and Greece,---Boston, Ginn and C07, 1904.
Greece, Histoy: ~ Nations
Series,Vo
•I I , New York,
F. P. Collier and Son Co.,1928.
Plutarch's Solon, PlutarchiiParallelae, Sumptibus etTypis B. G. Tuebneri, Lypsiae, 1864.
Thucydides, Bk. I , Loeb Edition,New York, G. P. Putnam's Son1919.
* * *-lfo * * *
*
7/27/2019 Solon the Lawgiver in the Light of Recent Discoveries and Criticism
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/solon-the-lawgiver-in-the-light-of-recent-discoveries-and-criticism 96/96
The thesis ffSolon, The Lawgiver, in the Light
of Recent Discoveries and C r i t i o i s ~ , " written by Charles
A. Castellano,S.J., has been accepted by the Graduate
School with reference to form, and by the readers whose
names appear below with reference to content. It is
therefore accepted in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Master of Arts.
Rev. Joseph A. Walsh,S.J.
Allan P. Farrell ,S.J.
July 10,1936
July 11,1936