solution based airport con sulting - nctcog
TRANSCRIPT
2015Int
Origin
5 Dal lasternat io
nating Pa
s Fort-Wonal Airpassenger S
Worth port Survey
W
40
CTF
Web site: www
Solution‐Ba
9 W. Huron StSuite
Chicago, IL 60Tel. (312) 988‐Fax. (312) 988‐w.unison‐ucg.
sed Airport Con
treet e 400 0654 3360 ‐3370 .com
nsulting
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | i
Table of Contents
Contents
I. Survey Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 1
I.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 1
I.2 Sampling Design ................................................................................................................................................ 1
I.3 Sampling Instrument .......................................................................................................................................... 2
I.4 Survey Administration ....................................................................................................................................... 4
I.5 Data Processing ................................................................................................................................................. 5
I.6 Data Weighting .................................................................................................................................................. 6
I.7 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 11
I.8 Lessons Learned .............................................................................................................................................. 13
II. Data Collected .................................................................................................................................................. 15
II.1 Originating versus Connecting by Time of Day (Unweighted Data) ........................................................... 15
II.4 Originating Passengers - Records by Time of Day (Unweighted Data) ....................................................... 16
II.5 Originating Passengers By Airline (Unweighted Data) ................................................................................ 17
II.6 Destination Map (Unweighted Data) ........................................................................................................... 18
II.7 Originating Passengers - Records by Destination Zone (Unweighted Data) ................................................ 19
II.8 Originating Passengers - Records by Top Destination (Unweighted Data) ................................................. 20
II.9 Area of Origination ...................................................................................................................................... 21
II.10 Origination Location ................................................................................................................................... 20
III. Trip Characteristics .......................................................................................................................................... 21
III.1 Trip to the Airport ....................................................................................................................................... 21
III.2 Parking Characteristics ................................................................................................................................ 25
III.3 Airline Trip .................................................................................................................................................. 27
IV. Demographic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................... 30
IV.1 Gender ......................................................................................................................................................... 30
IV.2 Age .............................................................................................................................................................. 31
IV.3 Employment ................................................................................................................................................ 31
IV.4 Ethnicity ...................................................................................................................................................... 32
V. Household Demographics ................................................................................................................................ 33
V.1 Household Vehicles ..................................................................................................................................... 33
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | i
V.2 Household Size ............................................................................................................................................ 34
V.3 Annual Income ............................................................................................................................................ 35
V.4 Home Location ............................................................................................................................................ 37 Appendix A – Dallas Fort-Worth Survey Questionnaire
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 1
I. Survey Methodology
I.1 ProjectOverview
The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) commissioned Unison Consulting, Inc. (Unison) to conduct the 2015 North Central Texas Departing Airline Passenger Surveys at Dallas Fort-Worth International Airport (DFW) and Dallas Love Field Airport (DAL). The main purpose of these surveys is to provide updated originating information regarding departing passengers’ travel patterns and trip-making behavior after the lifting of the Wright Amendment’s flight restrictions at DAL in October 2014. The last airline passenger surveys were performed in 2001 for DFW and 2014 for DAL. This report describes the survey methodology and summary-level findings at DFW.
I.2 SamplingDesign
The sampling approach at DFW is based on daily scheduled seats by airline, destination zone, and time period for the survey. To ensure the sample is representative of the airport population, we first used a stratified sampling method based on the distribution of scheduled seats by zone. For example, to determine the market share per zone, we summed up the total number of scheduled seats by zone during the survey period from the Official Aviation Guide (OAG) database. For example, according to the OAG database, 30 percent of scheduled seats for the initial survey period are destined for the Eastern zone. Considering a total sample target of 7,000 originating (O&D) surveys we estimated approximately 2,121 surveys would need to be collected for this zone (Table I-1A).
TABLE I-1A – EXAMPLE OF SAMPLING TARGETS BY DESTINATION ZONE - DFW
Table I-1B shows the sampling targets based on time period. Considering departing flights during the 12am time period only account for one percent of total flights, the sample target was 56 O&D surveys.
TABLE I-1B – EXAMPLE OF SAMPLING TARGETS BY TIME PERIOD - DFW
Destination Zone Scheduled Seats Market Share Sample Target
Eastern 2,003,517 30% 2,121
Central 1,328,772 20% 1,406
Pacific 1,030,069 16% 1,090
Texas 784,766 12% 831
International 817,258 12% 865
Mountain 608,362 9% 644
Hawaii 40,984 1% 43
Total 6,613,728 7,000
Time Period Scheduled Seats Market Share Sample Target
12am 53,072 1% 56
6am 967,161 15% 1,024
9am 1,368,258 21% 1,448
12pm 1,171,230 18% 1,240
3pm 1,309,005 20% 1,385
6pm 1,312,278 20% 1,389
9pm 432,724 7% 458
Total 6,613,728 7,000
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 2
Table I-1C shows the sampling targets based on airline. According to OAG data, American Airlines flights account for 85 percent of the market share. Thus, the sample target for O&D passengers traveling with American Airlines was 5,948 surveys.
TABLE I-1C – EXAMPLE OF SAMPLING TARGETS BY AIRLINE - DFW
I.3 SamplingInstrument
NCTCOG provided a list of information that was required to be collected on a survey, in order for the survey to be considered usable. The required information was the following:
Geo-codable trip origin
Destination airport or country Trip purpose
Access mode to the airport
Parking preference (if parked)
Transportation cost reimbursement
Airline
Flight number
Airline Scheduled Seats Market Share Sample Target
Aeromexico 11,880 0% 13
Air Canada 13,140 0% 14
Alaska Airlines 36,049 1% 38
American Airlines 5,620,112 85% 5,948
Avianca 4,608 0% 5
Boutique Air 2,565 0% 3
British Airways 20,529 0% 22
Delta Air Lines 256,930 4% 272
Emirates 32,184 0% 34
Etihad Airways 7,826 0% 8
Frontier 32,712 0% 35
Japan Airlines 3,906 0% 4
JetBlue 17,350 0% 18
KLM‐Royal Dutch 972 0% 1
Korean Air 10,671 0% 11
Lufthansa 11,025 0% 12
PublicCharters.com 418 0% 0
Qantas Airways 26,784 0% 28
Qatar Airways 17,685 0% 19
Spirit Airlines 248,970 4% 264
Sun Country Airlines 7,416 0% 8
United Airlines 213,157 3% 226
US Airways 12,613 0% 13
Volaris 4,226 0% 4
Total 6,613,728 7,000
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 3
Time of survey
Home Information - Zip code or identifiable location for Texas residents; US State/Zip Code or International Country, otherwise.
In addition, NCTCOG specified the following additional information to be collected from each respondent.
Origin Type
Travel Time to the Airport
Size of Travel Party to the Airport (Persons, Vehicles)
Size of Trip Travel Party
Trip Duration
Gender
Age
Employment Status
Ethnicity
Number of Household Vehicles
Household Size
Household Income
At the beginning of each survey, the respondent was asked if he or she was originating from DFW. Respondents who were originating from Dallas Fort-Worth would be offered the full survey. Respondents connecting through DFW would have their survey terminate after that question, but the survey would be recorded and used to calculate the percentage of originating passengers on each flight.
Using the 2014 DAL survey questionnaire as a baseline, Unison developed two separate survey instruments to collect passenger information at DAL and DFW, which mainly differed by airport-specific responses to questions and City of Dallas Aviation Department question additions to the DAL survey. Unison worked closely with NCTCOG to ensure each question was clear, concise, and easy to understand. Draft questionnaires were provided to NCTCOG for review and comment.
Once approved, the questionnaires were loaded onto hand-held computer tablets. Questions were programmed with skip logic and conditional branching to ensure that respondents were asked only those questions relevant to them. For example, only passengers who came to the airport via private vehicle were asked questions about parking, whereas all other passengers skipped parking questions. When the programming was complete, two tablets were shipped to NCTCOG for testing and approval.
On September 1, 2015, a pilot test of the survey questionnaire was conducted at DFW. A total of 88 surveys were collected during the pilot test. The results of the pilot tests were reviewed and analyzed. About half of the responses were from originating passengers (46 surveys) and would qualify for the study. Unison reviewed the raw survey data and recoded and cleaned, as appropriate, to better classify passenger responses and determine usability of surveys. A total of 36 surveys (77 percent of originating surveys) included valid data in the required fields and, therefore, met the criteria for usability.
Based on the pilot test, modifications to the questionnaire were needed to explain how trip purpose, home address, and origin address were obtained. To help improve the quality of origin data collected, passengers were presented with a series of questions and options to extract detailed origination information.
Since more detailed information was needed from counties within NCTCOG’s metropolitan planning area, an initial
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 4
question to define the general location of the origin was asked. “Is your starting location within the Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex area? Within 100 miles of airport.” If the respondent answered yes, the surveyor then would ask what information they could provide about the origin with the following question:
“What can you provide:
1) Address 2) Cross Streets and City 3) Name of Landmark/Business/ Hotel and City”
Passengers who chose “1) Address” or “2) Cross Streets and City” were presented with a comprehensive list of streets and cities in the Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex. Passengers who chose “3) Name of Landmark/ Business / Hotel and City” were asked to provide as much information as possible regarding the landmark.
If the respondents did not originate from the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex area, the surveyors asked them to provide any information about their origin – street, cross streets, landmarks, and/or zip codes; a valid city or zip code would be considered sufficient to locate an origin outside the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex.
Because origination information is critical to the study, surveys without sufficient information would not be considered usable; thus, Unison added a quality check question for interviewer’s use: “Is information complete?” At this point, if origin information was incomplete, the survey would be terminated. Passengers who provided complete origination information would continue with the remaining questions of the survey.
The survey questionnaire was updated, and then finalized after discussion and review by NCTCOG. The final DFW survey questionnaire (attached as Appendix A) consisted of 27 questions presented through 74 total tablet screens.
I.4 SurveyAdministration
Survey administration at DFW was a team effort between Unison and its two local subcontractors, National Service Research (“NSR”) and Consumer & Market Insights (“CMI”). NSR and CMI led hiring and managed the data collection; Unison communicated with the Aviation Department and provided training and project oversight. To ensure a successful survey process, Unison provided a comprehensive training session so that all interviewers understood the objectives of the project, each question being asked, use of the tablets, general rules and regulations of the airport, and performance expectations.
To conduct surveys in the airline holdrooms, all interviewers were required to obtain proper security identification badges. The NSR team already had proper security badges so were able to start work immediately. Only a few CMI employees had security badges and the others were required to complete badging applications and undergo background checks and fingerprinting. CMI staff coordinated this process with the DFW’s Aviation Planning Department who signed off on the badging applications then worked with the badging office to ensure all of the TSA requirements were met.
On every survey day, each interviewer was assigned to specific gates to conduct surveys and provided a list of scheduled flights. Interviewers randomly approached passengers waiting at the airline gate hold rooms for an assigned flight, reviewed flight information with each passenger respondent, and then administered surveys via electronic tablet. At the end of the day, the team reconvened to discuss tips on how to improve response rates and overcome challenges with the process. Electronic tablets were uploaded at the end of the shifts onto a secure remote server for Unison’s review. Unison provided daily reports to supervisors and weekly updates to
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 5
NCTCOG to stay abreast of survey progress, and to ensure the survey objectives were being met.
Survey administration at DFW lasted for 56 weekdays from October 13, 2015 to February 3, 2016. The response rate for the survey was approximately 80 percent: 4 out of 5 of all passengers (originating and connecting) approached by an interviewer agreed to participate in the survey.
I.5 DataProcessing
Unison used Microsoft Excel for initial processing and data cleaning of survey results. First, Unison performed a quality check of the survey results to ensure the data provided all the necessary information required for the project. According to the project specifications, a survey is considered usable if it includes the following information:
Geo-codable trip origin
Destination airport or country
Access mode to the airport
Trip purpose
Parking preference (if parked)
Transportation cost reimbursement
Airline Flight number
Time of survey
Home information
Surveys marked usable were then geocoded by Unison’s subcontractor, Maroon Society, which led the geocoding tasks. The process of geo-coding includes matching a location to its corresponding latitude and longitude coordinates. Maroon Society used Texas A&M Geoservices (Geoservices) to geocode the origin locations. Trip origination data was geocoded based on address, cross streets, or other information provided by the passenger.
Approximately 4,000 origination locations – business, hotels, and landmarks – were manually researched for street addresses to be geocoded. In several instances, the Geoservices software did not provide a matching centroid (center) for certain, although valid, cross streets (North/South and East/West); in these cases, additional manual research was required to locate appropriate latitude and longitude coordinates. In some cases, ZIP codes, identified by NCTCOG, were used for the purpose of conducting the geospatial analysis.
In terms of home information, Unison geocoded information for passengers residing in Texas. Unison geocoded locations within the Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex by address or cross streets. For home locations outside the Metroplex but within Texas, addresses, cross streets, or ZIP code centroids were geocoded. Home state and/or country was provided for passengers who reside outside of Texas.
Further, Unison geocoded airport destinations identified in the survey. Airports were geocoded to FAA latitude and longitude coordinates and provided to NCTCOG in a separate file.
Approximately 16 percent of collected origination surveys were not considered usable due to incomplete data, including non-geocodeable locations, after the extensive review by Unison and NCTCOG. Eight-four percent (8,379) of the 9,942 originating surveys collected qualified as usable and, therefore, were able to be used in the weighting process to expand the dataset.
Summary2015 Dalla
I.6 D
The procload factdesignatdestinatiTime Zo2:59pm;describe
1 http://w
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
DataWeigh
cess to weight tors by month ted data sets, kion (Texas, USone, Hawaii/Al 3pm: 3-5:59pd below.
I .6.1 DS
The OAG datuniverse of dedeparture timFebruary 3, 20days for each International)
I .6.2 E
The percentagDepartment omiles as a proJanuary and FThe airlines’ lfor each airlin
TABLE I-2 – LO
www.transtats.b
Findings Originating Passen
hting
data considerand airline, an
known as sampS Eastern Timelaska, and Inte
pm; 6pm: 6-8:5
Develop a trata
ta on scheduleepartures. Thee, and flight n016). This sumdestination str
) and scheduled
stimate th
ge of the seatsof Transportatioportion of avaFebruary 2016load factors ane separately.
OAD FACTORS
bts.gov
nger Survey
rs several factond the proportiple “strata.” Ine Zone, US Ceernational) and59pm; and 9pm
Universe o
d seats for DFe OAG data inumber for eacmmary was firrata (Texas, dod time period
he Percent
that are filledon, Bureau ofailable seat-mi6 for DFW werare shown in T
BY AIRLINE, D
ors including sion of originat
n addition, the entral Time Zod time period (m: 9-11:59pm
of the Num
FW departures ncludes scheduh day surveysrst developed omestic in eacof departure.
t of Total S
d was calculatef Transportatioiles) for Octobre used since t
Table I-2. Beca
DFW (% OF AV
scheduled seatting and conneexpansion neeone, US Moun(6am: 6-8:59 a
m). The weight
mber of Av
were used as uled seats depas were conductfor each day a
ch of four time
Seats that
ed for each airlon Statistics weber, Novemberthey representause of the diff
VAILABLE SEATS
ts during the decting passengeded to be donntain Time Zonam; 9am: 9-1ting methodol
vailable Se
an estimate ofarting by airlinted at DFW (Oand then for the zones, Alask
Are Filled
line, using loaebsite1. Load r, and Decembthe data collec
fferences by air
S)
P a
ates of the surgers for each ne by airline, ne, and US W1:59am; 12pmogy for DFW
eats in Eac
f the potential ne, destinationOctober 13, 20he sum of sampka/Hawaii, and
ad factors fromfactors (passe
ber 2015 as wection period atrline, these we
g e | 6
rveys,
Western m: 12-
is
ch
n, 015 to ple
d
m the U.S. enger-ell as t DFW. ere applied
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 7
I .6.3 Examine Originating Flight Patterns and Calculate Originating Flight Rate
As part of the weighting process, the originating flight patterns were calculated as the number of originating passenger surveys versus the total number of originating and connecting passenger surveys collected. For the purpose of this calculation, all surveys with airline, flight, time, and destination were considered regardless of completeness of required fields or geocodable origin. Tables considering origination flight rate by airline, origination flight rate by time of day period, and origination flight rate by destination zone were analyzed by all parties to make the final decision on how to best use the originating flight data. Since the originating flight patterns varied so much by carrier, it was agreed to apply originating flight percentage by airline first, then time period and destination.
There were too few samples in some of the stratum to make robust estimates. In those cases, cells were combined by destination then time. The final origination percentages used are shown in Table I-3.
TABLE I-3– FINAL ORIGINATING FLIGHT ESTIMATES BY SAMPLE STRATA FOR EXPANSION
Yes No Yes No
6am+9am 91 23 114 79.8% 20.2%
12pm 66 16 82 80.5% 19.5%
3pm 79 32 111 71.2% 28.8%
6pm+9pm 85 108 193 44.0% 56.0%
321 179 500 64.2% 35.8%
6am+12pm 34 6 40 85.0% 15.0%
3pm 27 21 48 56.3% 43.8%
6pm 22 10 32 68.8% 31.3%
Eastern All Times 87 25 112 77.7% 22.3%
Mountain All Time Zones 53 8 61 86.9% 13.1%
6am+9am 43 5 48 89.6% 10.4%
12pm 24 2 26 92.3% 7.7%
3pm 86 6 92 93.5% 6.5%
6pm+9pm 38 34 72 52.8% 47.2%
6am 61 9 70 87.1% 12.9%
9am 24 1 25 96.0% 4.0%
12pm 63 2 65 96.9% 3.1%
3pm 73 4 77 94.8% 5.2%
6pm 48 19 67 71.6% 28.4%
683 152 835 81.8% 18.2%
6am 62 17 79 78.5% 21.5%
9am 140 176 316 44.3% 55.7%
12pm 71 101 172 41.3% 58.7%
3pm 161 180 341 47.2% 52.8%
6pm 138 56 194 71.1% 28.9%
9pm 151 72 223 67.7% 32.3%
723 602 1325 54.6% 45.4%Subtotal Amercian and Sun Country International
Sun Country and Spirit Airlines Domestic
Central. Mountain, Pacific
Eastern
Subtotal
American and Sun Country International
International
TotalOriginating @ DFW (%)
US Airways, Frontier, Boutique, Jet Blue
Airline Zone Time PeriodOriginating @ DFW (n)
Aeromexico, Air Canada, Avianca, British Airways, Emirates, Etihad, Korean,
Lufthansa, Quantas, Qatar, Volaris
International
Subtotal International Only
Alaska Airlines Pacific
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 8
TABLE I-3– FINAL ORIGINATING FLIGHT ESTIMATES BY SAMPLE STRATA FOR EXPANSION (CONTINUED)
Yes No Yes No
6am 154 23 177 87.0% 13.0%
9am 420 247 667 63.0% 37.0%
12pm 238 191 429 55.5% 44.5%
3pm 280 166 446 62.8% 37.2%
6pm 212 134 346 61.3% 38.7%
9pm 32 71 103 31.1% 68.9%
6am 386 98 484 79.8% 20.2%
9am 900 441 1341 67.1% 32.9%
12pm 662 442 1104 60.0% 40.0%
3pm 427 259 686 62.2% 37.8%
6pm + 9pm 376 259 635 59.2% 40.8%
Hawaii 9am 80 40 120 66.7% 33.3%
6am 84 14 98 85.7% 14.3%
9am 235 98 333 70.6% 29.4%
12pm 198 225 423 46.8% 53.2%
3pm 58 26 84 69.0% 31.0%
6pm 67 71 138 48.6% 51.4%
9pm 48 68 116 41.4% 58.6%
6am 235 106 341 68.9% 31.1%
9am 304 249 553 55.0% 45.0%
12pm 174 137 311 55.9% 44.1%
3pm 213 182 395 53.9% 46.1%
6pm 85 61 146 58.2% 41.8%
9pm 40 48 88 45.5% 54.5%
6am 107 10 117 91.5% 8.5%
9am 171 171 342 50.0% 50.0%
12pm 150 137 287 52.3% 47.7%
3pm 267 243 510 52.4% 47.6%
6pm 218 166 384 56.8% 43.2%
9pm 72 264 336 21.4% 78.6%
Central, Eastern, Mountain
12am 37 2 39 94.9% 5.1%
6930 4649 11579 59.8% 40.2%Subtotal American Domestic
American Airlines
Central
Eastern
Mountain
Pacific
Texas
TotalOriginating @ DFW (%)
Airline Zone Time PeriodOriginating @ DFW (n)
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 9
TABLE I-3– FINAL ORIGINATING FLIGHT ESTIMATES BY SAMPLE STRATA FOR EXPANSION (CONTINUED)
Yes No Yes No
Eastern, Central, Mountain, Pacific
6am/9am 31 27 58 53.4% 46.6%
Texas 6am/9am 29 1 30 96.7% 3.3%
Central 12pm 154 12 166 92.8% 7.2%
Eastern 12pm 76 2 78 97.4% 2.6%
Mountain 12pm 64 0 64 100.0% 0.0%
Texas 12pm 69 5 74 93.2% 6.8%
Eastern 3pm, 6pm 33 4 37 89.2% 10.8%
Central 3pm, 6pm 45 12 57 78.9% 21.1%
Mountain 3pm/6pm/12am 38 16 54 70.4% 29.6%
Pacific 3pm, 6pm 28 8 36 77.8% 22.2%
Texas 3pm/6pm/12am 37 26 63 58.7% 41.3%
604 113 717 84.2% 15.8%
Eastern 6am 31 0 31 0.0% 100.0%
Eastern 9am 96 16 112 12.5% 87.5%
Eastern 12pm 171 20 191 9.5% 90.5%
Eastern 3pm 117 21 138 13.2% 86.8%
Central/Mountain 6am 45 2 47 4.1% 95.9%
Central/Pacific 9am 27 5 32 13.5% 86.5%
Central 12pm 31 3 34 8.1% 91.9%
Mountain/Pacific 12pm 33 4 37 9.8% 90.2%
Central 3pm 24 3 27 10.0% 90.0%
Eastern, Central, Mountain, Pacific
6pm+12am 36 55 91 37.7% 62.3%
611 129 740 82.6% 17.4%
Total All Airlines All Destinations All Times 9,872 5,824 15,696 62.9% 37.1%
United
Subtotal United
Delta Air Lines
Subtotal Delta
TotalOriginating @ DFW (%)
Airline Zone Time PeriodOriginating @ DFW (n)
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 10
I .6.4 Code Passenger Surveys into Sample Strata and Weight Surveys The originating passenger surveys were coded by airline, time period, and destination. The completed surveys were then summed by each sample stratum (as shown in Table I-3).
The actual weight is simply the reciprocal of the total completed surveys by originating passengers in each stratum to the total estimate of Originating Seats within each stratum. The calculation of the survey is shown below.
Available Seats (AVAIL_WGT): AVAIL_WGT = (Total Seats * Load Factors)
Total Seats - the total of all seats is estimated from the OAG data.
Originating Seats (ORIG_WGT): ORIG_WGT = AVAIL_WGT * Origination Factor
Origination Factor – the calculation of Origination Factor is discussed in Section 1.6.3 and its value for each stratum is shown in Table I-3.
Estimate of Daily Travel (DAY_WGT): DAY_WGT = ORIG_WGT / 56
To get daily weight, divide the weights into 56 sample days.
The results of the calculations are shown in Table I-4.
TABLE I-4 – FINAL CALCULATED WEIGHTS BY STRATUM2
2 Table I-4 includes surveys qualified as usable by NCTCOG
Airline Destination Time STRATA AVAIL_SEATS ORIG_SEATS SAMPLES ORIG_WGT DAY_WGT
5,460,253 3,292,318 8,380 436.55 7.80Eastern 6am 1 29,267 29,267 28 1,045.26 18.67Eastern 9am 2 34,256 4,282 78 54.90 0.98Eastern 12pm 3 30,101 2,860 154 18.57 0.33Eastern 3pm 4 29,889 3,945 111 35.54 0.63
Central/ Mountain 6am 5 15,130 620.31 39 15.91 0.28Central/ Pacific 9am 6 6,522 880.44 21 41.93 0.75
Central 12pm 7 6,077 492.21 27 18.23 0.33Mountain/ Pacific 12pm 8 13,073 1,281 22 58.23 1.04
Central 3pm 9 3,752 375.24 23 16.31 0.29Eastern, Central, Mountain, Pacific
6pm+12am10 10,735 4,047 10 404.72 7.23
Eastern, Central, Mountain, Pacific
6am/9am11 55,498 34,908 30 1,163.60 20.78
Texas 6am/9am 12 13,415 8,438 28 301.37 5.38Central 12pm 13 11,778 7,408 142 52.17 0.93Eastern 12pm 14 12,990 8,171 72 113.48 2.03
Mountain 12pm 15 5,212 3,278 58 56.53 1.01Texas 12pm 16 7,386 4,646 63 73.74 1.32
Eastern 3pm, 6pm 17 10,597 6,665 26 256.36 4.58Central 3pm, 6pm 18 13,432 8,449 37 228.34 4.08
Mountain 3pm/6pm/12am 19 13,995 8,803 37 237.91 4.25Pacific 3pm, 6pm 20 11,897 7,483 26 287.81 5.14Texas 3pm/6pm/12am 21 18,112 11,392 26 438.16 7.82
All
Delta Air Lines
United
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 11
TABLE I-4 – FINAL CALCULATED WEIGHTS BY STRATUM (CONTINUED)3
3 Table I-4 includes surveys qualified as usable by NCTCOG
Airline Destination Time STRATA AVAIL_SEATS ORIG_SEATS SAMPLES ORIG_WGT DAY_WGT
5,460,253 3,292,318 8,380 436.55 7.806am 22 118,378 102,989 141 730.42 13.049am 23 177,888 112,069 360 311.30 5.56
12pm 24 190,764 105,874 201 526.74 9.413pm 25 200,521 125,927 243 518.22 9.256pm 26 231,683 142,021 192 739.70 13.219pm 27 65,807 20,466 27 758.00 13.546am 28 217,099 173,245 324 534.71 9.559am 29 251,181 168,542 770 218.89 3.91
12pm 30 271,103 162,662 569 285.87 5.103pm 31 227,881 141,742 354 400.40 7.15
6pm + 9pm 32 354,892 210,096 323 650.45 11.62Hawaii 9am 33 33,825 22,561 67 336.73 6.01
6am 34 57,921 49,638 71 699.13 12.489am 35 80,482 56,821 210 270.57 4.83
12pm 36 86,885 40,662 171 237.79 4.253pm 37 63,826 44,040 42 1,048.58 18.726pm 38 63,145 30,689 42 730.68 13.059pm 39 47,154 19,522 41 476.14 8.506am 40 93,980 64,752 191 339.02 6.059am 41 162,794 89,537 264 339.15 6.06
12pm 42 110,103 61,547 134 459.31 8.203pm 43 171,546 92,463 164 563.80 10.076pm 44 125,836 73,237 62 1,181.24 21.099pm 45 63,853 29,053 36 807.03 14.416am 46 81,200 74,298 89 834.81 14.919am 47 97,784 48,892 153 319.56 5.71
12pm 48 109,156 57,089 136 419.77 7.503pm 49 130,119 68,182 228 299.04 5.346pm 50 102,234 58,069 180 322.61 5.769pm 51 88,329 18,902 55 343.68 6.14
Central, Eastern, Mountain
12am52 29,392 27,893 32 871.66 15.57
6am+12pm 53 12,511 10,634 29 366.69 6.553pm 54 7,905 4,451 23 193.50 3.466pm 55 9,411 6,456 19 339.77 6.07
Eastern All Times 56 21,032 16,342 56 291.82 5.21Mountain All Time Zones 57 3,961 3,442 2 1,720.88 30.73
6am 58 40,127 31,500 46 684.78 12.239am 59 175,031 77,539 117 662.72 11.83
12pm 60 64,015 26,438 59 448.10 8.003pm 61 107,077 50,540 133 380.00 6.796pm 62 67,384 47,910 116 413.02 7.389pm 63 67,518 45,710 114 400.96 7.16
Alaska Airlines Pacific
US Airways, Frontier, Boutique, Jet Blue
American and Sun Country International
International
All
American Airlines
Central
Eastern
Mountain
Pacific
Texas
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 12
TABLE I-4 – FINAL CALCULATED WEIGHTS BY STRATUM (CONTINUED)4
4 Table I-4 includes surveys qualified as usable by NCTCOG
Airline Destination Time STRATA AVAIL_SEATS ORIG_SEATS SAMPLES ORIG_WGT DAY_WGT
5,460,253 3,292,318 8,380 436.55 7.806am+9am 64 49,223 44,104 34 1,297.18 23.16
12pm 65 7,539 6,958 17 409.31 7.313pm 66 25,397 23,747 68 349.21 6.24
6pm+9pm 67 21,880 11,552 34 339.78 6.076am 68 45,682 39,789 49 812.03 14.509am 69 7,689 7,382 19 388.52 6.94
12pm 70 14,944 14,481 55 263.29 4.703pm 71 25,495 24,169 60 402.82 7.196pm 72 8,701 6,230 45 138.45 2.47
6am+9am 73 34,675 27,671 81 341.61 6.10
12pm 74 13,014 10,477 55 190.48 3.40
3pm 75 31,038 22,099 70 315.70 5.64
6pm+9pm 76 31,682 13,940 42 331.91 5.93
All Unassigned All All 77 107,446 67,583 106 637.58 11.39
Aeromexico, Air Canada, Avianca, British Airways,
Emirates, Etihad, Korean, Lufthansa,
Quanta's, Qatar, Volaris
International
Sun Country and Spirit Airlines Domestic
Central, Mountain, Pacific
Eastern
All
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 13
I.7 DataAnalysis
Unison used SPSS, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, for survey analysis. Unison analyzed the survey data using standard statistical methods such as frequency and cross tabulation analysis. It is important to note in the analysis below, the figures and tables depict weighted data by “DAY_WGT” unless otherwise specified.
I.8 LessonsLearned
One of the challenges of conducting surveys at DFW is the time and resources required to obtain security badges. In order to conduct surveys in the airline gate rooms all interviewers must have proper security identification badges or be escorted. For several weeks, we were unclear about how many badges could be signed-off for the project, which delayed staff recruitment and the overall project schedule. It was our initial understanding that each interviewer could apply for a badge, which was the basis for our work plan and critical to our sampling plan. However, we were later informed only five badges could be issued for this project and the remaining interviewers must be escorted during survey administration. This change would result in a new sampling plan and a work strategy. After a few discussions between NCTCOG and DFW management staff, a decision was made that our team could obtain as many badges that would be required to execute the initial plan.
To help keep the project on track, CMI, who was our original subcontractor, had some interviewers on-staff that had DFW security badges through existing survey projects at DFW. These interviewers were able to start conducting surveys while we waited for the others to obtain badges. The badging process took several additional weeks and multiple trips to the airport: each interviewer was required to fill out an application, obtain an authorized signature, make an appointment to submit fingerprints, and another appointment to pick up the badge. Meanwhile, the initial group of CMI interviewers who were conducting the NCTCOG surveys was asked to perform other DFW marketing surveys and was no longer available for this project. In November 2015, Unison enlisted the help of another local market research firm, National Service Research, to assist in survey administration.
Between November and December 2015, CMI and NSR simultaneously conducted surveys at DFW. Unison managed two sets of schedules as well as coordinated sharing electronic survey tablets between the firms. Survey administration lasted 56 days, from September 2015 to February 2016, excluding weekends and the holiday season due to high employee turnover. Further, it had come to our attention that CMI’s DBE certification expired in January 2016, Unison decided to proceed with NSR as the sole subcontractor.
An important lesson learned is that collecting a sample, which was stratified by three different targets – by destination zone, time period, and airline – posed some challenges with respect to weighting and survey administration. For example, some sample sizes were too small (i.e. the margin of error was beyond acceptable statistical standards) and thus these samples were combined to make the data more meaningful.
In terms of survey administration, collecting a sample according to various targets required significant resources and time. Survey interviewers targeted specific flights to ensure sampling targets were achieved, which resulted in oversampling certain targets. Because of the various sample targets, data collection took 56 total days to be completed, which also required close coordination between the NCTCOG project team and DFW’s marketing department to ensure NCTCOG surveys did not impede survey efforts conducted directly by DFW Airport. For future surveys, it is recommended that the sampling plan be based on the required analysis rather than three different targets.
In development of the questionnaire, there was some questions that did not capture the information as originally intended. One case of this was asking for trying to determine the number of people and number of vehicles on
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 14
each trip to the airport. To capture this information, it was suggested to use the term well-wishers, which will encompass those friends and family who may bring you to the airport, but may not encompass others in the car in the case of a shuttle, or ride-share service. In future surveys, better attention should be paid to the wording of this question. Another case was the travel time to the airport. This question was designed to give an idea of the estimated travel time to the airport and a way to compare about travel times calculated in the regional travel mode from zone to zone. Only 26 surveys included a response to this question. In future surveys, this should be listed as a required question to define whether a survey is complete.
Summary2015 Dalla
II. D
At DFWpassengesurveys NCTCOsurveys,
TABLE II-
II.1 O
The relain Figure9:00 p.mpercent a9:00 am 9:00 a.mperiod ar
FIGURE I
Surve
Origina
Connec
Total
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
Data Col
W, the survey teers and 37 percollected, app
OG. The discuand the origin
1- SURVEYS C
Originating
ationship of orie II-1. Of the
m. or later: 60 pare originatingare originatin
m. to 6:00 p.m.re primarily or
I-1– ORIGINAT
ey Collected
ating
cting
Findings Originating Passen
lected
eam collected rcent (5,824) froximately 84ssion in this chn of the trip to
OLLECTED
gversusCo
iginating passtotal surveys
percent of all pg. A large majng at DFW. Be
are originatinriginating at D
TING VERSUS C
Frequen
6
3
nger Survey
a total of 15,7from connectin4 percent (8,37hapter describDFW.
onnecting
engers versus collected, the passengers depjority of passeetween 63 to 6ng. Further, paDFW: 58 perce
CONNECTING P
ncy Count
63% 9,87
37% 5,82
15,69
775 surveys ofng passengers79) are qualifiebes notable fin
byTimeof
connecting patime period w
parting DFW dngers (betwee
64 percent of passengers scheent compared t
PASSENGERS B
t
72
24
96
f which 63 peras shown in T
ed as usable afndings regardin
fDay(Unw
assenger survewith the largesduring this timen 81 to 91 perpassengers scheduled to depato 42 percent w
BY TIME OF DA
rcent (9,872) aTable II-1. Of fter review by ng the origin v
weightedD
eyed by time ot proportion o
me period are crcent) schedul
heduled to depart during the 6who are conne
AY (N=15,696
P a
are from originf the 9,872 origUnison and
vs connecting
Data)
of day is displf connections
connecting anded to depart beart between th6:00 p.m. timeecting at DFW
)
g e | 15
nating ginating
layed is
d 40 efore
he e-
W.
Summary2015 Dalla
II.2 O
Usable ocollectedTwenty-
FIGURE I
II.3 O
Schedulethe usab
TABLE II-Time
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
Originating
originating surd in November-three percent w
I-2– SURVEYS B
Originating
ed flights werele originating
2– SURVEYS BY
e of Day Perio
12am
6am
9am
12pm
3pm
6pm
9pm
Findings Originating Passen
gRecordsC
rveys collectedr (50 percent).was collected
BY MONTH (N
gPassenge
e grouped intopassenger sur
Y TIME OF DAY
od Time
12:00‐5
6:00‐8
9:00‐11
12:00‐2
3:00‐5
6:00‐8
9:00‐11
nger Survey
Collectedb
d by month ar Eleven percein January and
=8,379)
ers‐Recor
o seven time ofrveys.
Y (N=8,379)of Day
5:59 am
8:59 am
1:59 am
2:59 pm
:59 pm
:59 pm
1:59 pm
byMonth(
re displayed inent was collectd another two
rdsbyTime
f day periods.
Frequency
1%
12%
27%
23%
20%
13%
4%
(Unweight
n Figure II-2. Tted in Octoberpercent in Feb
eofDay(U
Table II-2 sh
Count
42
1,028
2,267
1,969
1,653
1,121
299
tedData)
The majority or and 14 percebruary.
Unweighte
hows the unwe
P a
of surveys werent in Decembe
edData)
eighted time gr
g e | 16
re er.
roupings of
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 17
II.4 OriginatingPassengersByAirline(UnweightedData)
Table II-3 shows the number of usable surveys completed by originating passengers for the 10 airlines with the largest market share at DFW. The majority of surveys are completed by passengers traveling with American Airlines (77 percent). United Airlines passengers represent seven percent and Delta Airlines passengers represent six percent of the sample. Spirit Airlines represents the fourth largest market share with four percent of passengers. The remaining airlines – Alaska, Emirates, Aeromexico, JetBlue, Frontier, and British Airways - each account for one percent or less of the total sample of originating passengers.
TABLE II-3– SURVEYS BY TOP 10 AIRLINES (N=8,379)
Airline Frequency
American Airlines 77%
United Airlines 7%
Delta Air Lines 6%
Spirit Airlines 4%
Alaska Airlines 1%
Emirates 1%
Aeromexico 1%
JetBlue Airways Corporation 1%
Frontier Airlines Inc. 0.5%
British Airways 0.4%
Summary2015 Dalla
II.5 D
Figure IITexas, E
The majpercent tpassengeflights arall seven
FIGURE I
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
Destination
I-3 shows the Eastern, Centra
ority of flightto the Pacific zers headed to Tre headed to Hn destination z
I-3- DESTINATIO
Findings Originating Passen
nMap(Un
destination zoal, Mountain,
s are destined zone. FurtherTexas, MountaHawaii/ Alaskazones.
ON ZONE MAP
nger Survey
weightedD
ones defined foPacific, Hawa
for the Easterr, the sample oain and Internaa. It is import
P (N=8,379)
Data)
for flights depaaii/Alaska, and
rn zone (38 peof data collecteational destinatant to note, A
arting DFW. Td International
ercent), 18 pered shows a fairation zones: 9
American Airli
There are sevel.
rcent to the Cerly even split ato 11 percent.
ines is the only
P a
en destination
entral zone, anamong origina. One percent y airline that s
g e | 18
n zones:
nd 13 ating of
serves
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 19
II.6 OriginatingPassengers‐RecordsbyDestinationZone(UnweightedData)
Table II-4 shows unweighted data for the top four airlines, in terms of market share, and destination zone. American Airlines has a sample from each of the possible destination zones. The top four destination zones for America Airline passengers are Eastern, Central, Pacific, and Texas. The majority of Delta Airlines flights are headed to the Eastern zone (73 percent), followed by the Central, Mountain, and Pacific zones. Spirit Airlines offers flights to four U.S. zones (Central, Eastern, Mountain, and Pacific) and the International zone. United Airlines travels to five U.S. zones including Central, Texas, Eastern, Mountain, and Pacific.
TABLE II-4 – SURVEYS FOR TOP 4 AIRLINES AND DESTINATION ZONE (N=7,907)
Zone By Airline
American Airlines: n=6,455
Central 18%
Eastern 36%
Hawaii 1%
International 9%
Mountain 9%
Pacific 13%
Texas 13%
Delta Airlines: n=532
Central 18%
Eastern 73%
Mountain 7%
Pacific 2%
Spirit Airlines: n=375
Central 11%
Eastern 61%
International 1%
Mountain 5%
Pacific 23%
United Airlines: n=545
Central 34%
Eastern 19%
Mountain 19%
Pacific 6%
Texas 21%
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 20
II.7 OriginatingPassengers‐RecordsbyTopDestination(UnweightedData)The top 10 destinations are shown in Table II-5. Chicago O’Hare International Airport is the top destination, followed by Atlanta-Hartsfield International Airport. The next three destinations that account for three percent of originating passengers are Denver International, Charlotte-Douglas International Airport, and Boston Logan Airport. The last four destinations that account for two percent are Philadelphia International Airport, New York La Guardia Airport, Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport, and Phoenix Sky-Harbor International Airport.
TABLE II-5– TOP 10 DESTINATIONS (N=8,379) Destination Frequency
Chicago O'Hare International Airport 6%
Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport 5%
Los Angeles International Airport 4%
Denver International Airport 3%
Charlotte‐Douglas International Airport 3%
Boston Logan International Airport 3%
Philadelphia International Airport 2%
New York La Guardia Airport 2%
Houston George Bush Intercontinental 2%
Phoenix Sky‐Harbor International Airport 2%
Summary2015 Dalla
II.8 A
To deterto the aMetropleto providpoint of were asklandmarkmatchingcoordina
Figure IIpercent) was defiEllis, Hoanother a
FIGURE I
Figure IIdirectly
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
AreaofOrig
rmine originatiairport for the cex? Within 10de the address origination an
ked to provide ks. These effog addresses. Tates.
I-4 shows weitraveled to the
ined as the 12 ood, Hunt, Joharea in Texas
I-4– LOCATIO
I-5 shows a mto DFW from
Findings Originating Passen
igination
ion, surveyorscurrent flight. 0 miles from tof his or her o
nd correspondiany informati
orts collected tThen all valid a
ighted data rege airport from county area of
hnson, Kaufmabut outside the
N OF TRIP ORIG
map of the weigm the 12-county
nger Survey
asked passeng First, the surv
the airport.” Iforigin, cross sting city and zipion available athousands of vaddresses or c
garding the loca location ins
f North Centraan, Parker, Roe Metroplex, a
GIN (N=8,302
ghted originaty area. Table
gers several quveyor asked “If a respondent treets, or the np code. Passe
about their tripverbatim respoross streets we
cation of the trside the Dallasal Texas whichckwall, Tarranand two percen
2)
ion data by zipII-6 display th
uestions aboutIs the locationanswered “Y
name of a landengers who resp origin such aonses, which were geocoded i
trip origin. Ths Fort Worth (h includes the nt, and Wise. nt originated o
p code, whichhe Origination
t the starting lon in the Dallas Yes,” the survedmark, businesponded “No”as address, crowere each reseinto latitude an
he majority of (“DFW”) Metrcounties of CFive percent o
outside of Tex
h only includesn by County.
P a
ocation of theiFort Worth
eyor asked himss, or hotel ne” or “Don’t knss streets, andarched to findnd longitude
passengers (9roplex. The Mollin, Dallas, Doriginated fromxas.
s passengers w
g e | 21
ir trip
m or her ear the now” d/or
d
3 Metroplex
Denton, m
who traveled
Summary2015 Dalla
FIGURE I
TABLE II-
Collin
Dallas
Denton
Ellis
Hood
Hunt
Johnso
Kaufma
Parker
Rockwa
Tarrant
Wise
Other C
Other C
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
I-5– ORIGINAT
6– ORIGINATIO
Origin Cou
n
n
an
all
t
County (Texa
County (Outs
Findings Originating Passen
TION BY ZIP CO
ON BY COUNT
unty
as)
side Texas)
nger Survey
ODE (N=8,302
TY
Frequency
10.0
38.7
9.0
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.4
31.7
0.2
5.4
1.6
2)
y
0%
7%
0%
7%
3%
2%
5%
5%
7%
4%
7%
2%
4%
6%
P a g e | 22
Summary2015 Dalla
II.9 O
Figure IIfrom thebusinessDallas C
FIGURE I
Work/com
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
Origination
I-6 shows weieir home (52 ps, or a companyConvention Ce
I-6– WHERE D
/ business/ mpany12%
Hotel/ mot26%
Findings Originating Passe
nLocation
ighted data forercent). Anothy. Nine percenter or anothe
ID YOU COME
Someone elseresidence
9%
el
DalConveCen.5%
enger Survey
Type
r origination loher 26 percent
ent originate frr location.
FROM PRIOR T
e's
las ention ter%
O
ocation type. t originate fromrom someone e
TO ARRIVING A
Other1%
The largest sum a hotel/moteelse’s residenc
AT THE AIRPORT
My 5
ubgroup of pasel and 12 percce and less tha
T TODAY? (N=
home52%
P a
ssengers origincent from workan 2 percent fr
=8,379)
g e | 20
nates k, a rom the
Summary2015 Dalla
III. T
In this sebehaviorpassenge
III.1 T
III.1
FigursevenSevenhotel/an airchart
FIGUR
III.1For ptranspor moparkepossiperceas thetime/perce
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
Trip Cha
ection, responsr of passengerser demographi
Triptothe
.1 Mode
re III-1 displayn percent of ornteen percent /motel shuttle rport shuttle (eer bus or orga
RE III-1– WHAT
.2 Reasonpassengers whoportation, we aore answers toers chose comfible respondenentage of non-pe reason for ch/ was running lent indicate nu
Findings Originating Passe
aracteri
ses to trip chars, including deics, and house
Airport
of Transp
ys the primaryriginating passused a rental vand five percee.g. Super Shu
anized bus, or o
T WAS YOUR PR
n for Transo used a privatasked “Why d
o this question.fort and conve
nts. Cost and parkers chosehoosing their mlate or size of
umber of lugga
enger Survey
stics
racteristics suretails about thehold demogra
ortation
y mode of transengers used avehicle and ninent used a ridesuttle or Prime other mode of
RIMARY MODE
sportationte vehicle but
did you choose. Their responenience (63 pereliability wer
e travel time (1mode of transptravel party as
age or another
rvey are presene trip to the ai
aphics.
nsportation to ta private vehiclne percent usesharing serviceTime). One p
f transportation
E OF TRANSPOR
n Choicedid not park a
e this mode ofnses are displaercent). Personre each specifi12 percent) orportation to DFs reasons for threason as to w
nted. Trip chairport, parking
the airport forle as their mod
ed a taxi/limoue such as Uberpercent each un to travel to D
RTATION TO TH
as well as passf transportationayed in Figure nal preferenceied between 23personal vehi
FW. Another heir mode of t
why they selec
aracteristics deg, details of th
r originating pde of transport
usine. Seven per or Lyft. Two
used the DARTDFW.
E AIRPORT? (N
sengers using on?” They wereIII-2. The largwas chosen by3 and 24 perceicle was not avone percent etransportation.cted their mode
P a
escribe the travhe airline trip,
passengers. Fitation to DFWercent used a o percent eachT light rail/bu
N=8,379)
other modes ofe allowed to segest subgroupy 36 percent oent. Almost anvailable (11 peeach chose lac. And almost te of transporta
g e | 21
vel
ifty-W.
h used s, a
f elect 1 of non-
of n equal ercent) ck of two ation.
Summary2015 Dalla
FIGUR
III.1To lealone“yes, other
FIGUR
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
RE III-2- WHY D
.3 Numbeearn about trave?” A summary
they are travers came to see
RE III-3- DID YO
Findings Originating Passe
DID YOU SELEC
er of Persovel party size, ty of their resp
eling alone” anthem off.
OU COME TO T
enger Survey
CT THIS MODE O
ons Travelthe survey firsonses are show
nd the remainin
THE AIRPORT A
OF TRANSPORT
ing to thest asked passenwn in Figure Ing 31 percent
ALONE TODAY?
TATION? SELEC
e Airport ngers “Did youIII-3. The masaid they are
? (N=8,312)
CT ALL THAT AP
u come to the ajority (69 pertraveling with
P a
PPLY. ( N=6,1
airport rcent) said h others or
g e | 22
96)
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 23
To better determine the size of the travel party (number of passengers traveling), the survey asked all passengers “How many others are traveling with you? (including yourself).” Of total responses, 71 percent are traveling alone. Twenty percent have a travel party size of two people (respondent and another traveler). Five percent are traveling with two others (travel party size is three people), two percent with three other passengers (travel party size is four), and two percent are traveling with four or more other passengers (travel party size is five or more). The weighted average is 2.7 people and the weighted median is 2.0 people. A table of these results can be viewed in Table III-1.
TABLE III-1- HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE TRAVELING WITH YOU, INCLUDING YOURSELF? (N=8,310)
We asked passengers who came to the airport with others “How many people came to the airport to see you off today?” The majority of passengers did not have a well-wisher see them off at DFW (79 percent). Sixteen percent had one well-wisher see them off and three percent had two well-wishers accompany them to the airport. Another one percent of passengers had three or more people see them off at the airport. The weighted average is 0.3 well-wishers and weighted median is 0.0. The full results of this question is listed in Table III-2.
TABLE III-2- HOW MANY PEOPLE CAME TO THE AIRPORT TO SEE YOU OFF? (N=2,433)
# of People (including self) Frequency Count
1 71% 6,015
2 20% 1,566
3 5% 400
4 2% 187
5+ 2% 142
# of Well‐Wishers Frequency Count
None 79% 1,933
1 16% 396
2 3% 85
3 or more 1% 20
Summary2015 Dalla
III.1Passeairpoone v
The sthis g
FIGUR
III.1Table
TABLE
Time
1
1
Av
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
.4 Vehicleengers who camort in one vehicvehicle. The r
sample size ofgroup, 84 perc
RE III-4- DID YO
.5 Occupe III-3 below s
E III-3- NUMBE
e Period O
6am
9am
12pm
3pm
6pm
9pm
12am
verage
Findings Originating Passen
es Travelime to the airpocle?” Ninety-sresponses are d
f passengers whent came in tw
OUR PARTY CO
pancy by shows the aver
R OF PEOPLE I
Occupancy of
nger Survey
ng to theort with othersseven percent displayed in F
ho came to thewo vehicles an
OME TO THE AI
Time of Drage vehicle oc
N VEHICLE BY T
f Trip to the A
2.3
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.4
2.3
Airport s in a private vcame in one vigure III-4.
e airport in mod 16 percent c
RPORT IN ONE
Day – Numccupancy of th
TIME OF DAY (
Airport
vehicle were avehicle, and on
ore than one vcame to the air
E VEHICLE (USE
mber of Phe trip to the a
(N=2,432)
asked, “Did yonly three perce
vehicle is relatirport in three o
ERS OF PRIVAT
eople byairport by time
P a
our party comeent came in mo
ively small (n=or more vehicl
TE VEHICLES) (N
Vehicle e of day.
a g e | 24
e to the ore than
=73). Of les.
N=2,432)
Summary2015 Dalla
III.2
III.2
The ppasseand dDFWaccouthe Pand F
FIGUR
III.2The sparticrespopassecommfive pchoicimpoaccou
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
ParkingC
.1 Parking
parking locatioengers who usedid not park. T
W Remote/Econunted for seve
Parking Spot anFly or another
RE III-5– WHER
.2 Reasonsurvey asked pcular lot; their onse. The mosengers who pamon reason forpercent said lace. Three percrtant to note thunt for less tha
Findings Originating Passen
Characteri
g Locatio
on of passengeed a private ve
The remaining nomy Parking
en percent of thnd DFW Airplot. Overall,
RE IS THE CAR P
n for Parkpassengers whresponses are
st common resarked. Cost, sr selecting a sp
ack of time/ runcent of passenghat size of travan 1 percent.
nger Survey
istics
n
ers who used aehicle as their49 percent par
g, closely followhe private vehort Valet. An90% of those
PARKED? (IF PR
ing Choico parked to sedisplayed in F
sponse was comelected by 45 pecific parkingnning late, andgers who parkvel party or nu
a private vehicmode of transrked their privwed by the DF
hicles being pand another two
who parked u
RIVATE VEHICLE
ce elect all of theFigure III-6. Tmfort and conpercent of theg lot. Coveredd two percent ked indicate anumber of bags
cle are describsportation, 51 pvate vehicle. TFW’s terminalarked. Three po percent of paused a parking
E WAS USED) (N
reasons why tThe passengersnvenience, whie passengers wd parking wasindicate travelnother reason did not impac
bed in Figure Ipercent were d
The most utilizl parking garagpercent of pasassengers whog lot operated b
N=4,662)
they decided tos were allowedich was selecte
who parked, was chosen by 12l time as reasofor their parki
ct passengers’
P a
III-5. Of the 4dropped off atzed parking lotge. DFW Exp
ssengers each uo parked used Pby DFW Airpo
o park at that d to select moed by 63 perceas the second m2 percent of paons for his/her ing choice. Itparking decisi
a g e | 25
4,662 t DFW t is press utilized Park ort.
re than 1 ent of most arkers, parking is
ion and
Summary2015 Dalla
FIGUR
III.2The spay f$10.0per d
FIGUR
5 Size of trave
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
RE III-6– IF YOU
.3 Cost ofsurvey asked pfor parking per00, 24 percent day for parking
RE III-7– COST
el party and nu
Findings Originating Passen
U PARKED, WH
f Parking passengers whr day?” Their reported betw
g. The average
T OF PARKING
umber of lugga
nger Survey
Y DID YOU PAR
o parked to giresponses are
ween $10.00 toe parking cost p
PER DAY (N=2
ge account for
RK THERE? SEL
ive us their bese shown in Figo $15.00, and 4per day was ap
2,162)
r less than one
LECT ALL THAT A
st estimate reggure III-7. Thi40 percent reppproximately $
percent
APPLY. ( N=2
garding “How irty-six percen
port paying mo$15.16.
P a
2,183)5
much will yount said less thaore than $15.00
a g e | 26
u an 0
Summary2015 Dalla
III.2The smajopasseall or
III.2As shbusinpasseget re
FIGUR
III.3 A
III.3
Figurof paor plecolleg
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
.4 Reimbusurvey asked prity (58 percen
engers will getriginating pass
.5 Reimbuhown in Figureness-related puengers travelineimbursed for
RE III-8– REIMB
AirlineTrip
.1 Purpos
re III-9 displayassengers are treasure and 19 ge or for other
Findings Originating Passen
ursement passengers abont) will be reit full reimburssengers are tra
ursement e III-8, cross t
urposes will beng for all non-btransportation
BURSEMENT BY
p
e of Trave
ys the primaryraveling for bupercent are vir purposes. Le
nger Survey
out parking or imbursed for psement (100 paveling for bus
by Trip Pabulation anal
e reimbursed fobusiness relaten or parking.
TRIP PURPOSE
el
y purpose of thusiness-relatedsiting friends oess than one pe
transportationparking or tranpercent) for trasiness-related r
urpose lysis reveals thfor transportatied purposes, su
E (N=5,183)
he airline trip fd purposes. Twor family. Onercent are trav
n reimbursemensportation. Fuansportation exreasons, these
hat 88 percention or parkinguch as vacation
for the originatwenty-four perne percent of pveling for milit
ent for the trip urther, over 98xpenses. Consresults are no
of passengers. Meanwhile, n or visiting fa
ting passengerrcent are trave
passengers eactary reasons.
P a
to the airport.8 percent of thsidering about
ot surprising.
traveling for only five percamily/ friends,
r. Fifty-four peling for the vah are traveling
a g e | 27
The hese t half of
ent of , will
percent acation g to/from
Summary2015 Dalla
FIGUR
III.3Figurearly the on
FIGUR
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
RE III-9– WHAT
.2 Purposre III-10 showmorning fligh
nly one where
RE III-10– TRIP
Findings Originating Passen
T IS THE PRIMAR
e of Travews the Trip Purphts: 12:00 a.m. a majority of
PURPOSE AND
nger Survey
RY PURPOSE O
el by Timepose by Time . to 6:00 a.m. apassengers are
D TIME OF DAY
F YOUR TRIP? (
e of Day of Day Periodare business tre non-business
Y(N=8,379)
(N=8,379)
Period d. A large majravelers. Thes travelers.
jority of passe9:00 p.m. or l
P a
engers travelinater time perio
a g e | 28
ng on od is
Summary2015 Dalla
III.3The shomeday ttwo tfrom
FIGU(N=8
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
.3 Trip Dusurvey asked pe on this trip?rips of one dato three days ahome for mor
RE III-11- HOW8,360)
Findings Originating Passen
ration passengers abo” Their respoy or less. The
and 30 percentre than five da
W MANY DAYS
nger Survey
out trip durationses are repre
e largest sub-gt for four to fivays.
HAVE YOU OR
on: “How manesented in Figugroup of passeve days. Twen
R WILL YOU BE A
ny days have yure III-11. Onengers (39 percnty-five perce
AWAY FROM H
you or will younly six percentcent) will be a
ent of passenge
HOME ON THIS
P a
u be away fromt of passengeraway from homers will be awa
TRIP?
a g e | 29
m rs have me for ay
Summary2015 Dalla
IV. De
IV.1 GFigure IVpercent)
FIGURE IV
IV.1The rmalesMeantravecomp
FIGUR
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
emograph
GenderV-1 shows theamong origin
V-1- GENDER
.1 Genderelationship bes are travelingnwhile, a largel – such as vac
pared to male p
RE IV-2- GEND
Findings Originating Passen
hic Char
e gender of thenating passenge
? (N=8,357)
er by Purpetween gender for business r
er percentage ocation/ pleasurpassengers (34
DER AND TRIP P
nger Survey
acterist
e survey responers.
pose r and trip purprelated purposeof female passre, visiting fam4 percent).
PURPOSE (N=8
tics
ndents. There
pose is providees (66 percentengers (63 per
mily/ friends, tr
8,357)
e are more mal
ed in Figure IVt) compared torcent) are travraveling to/ fro
les (59 percent
V-2. A larger o females (37 peling for non-bom college, or
P a
t) than female
percentage ofpercent). business relater other reasons
a g e | 30
es (41
f
ed s
Summary2015 Dalla
IV.2 AThe age between50 to 64 survey w
FIGURE IV
IV.3 EFigure IV(78 percemployepercentastudents
FIGURE IV
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
Ageof originating
n 35 to 64 yearyears old. Sev
was only admin
V-3- PLEASE S
EmploymenV-4 shows a cent) are emplo
ed and not lookage of unemplo
and Two perc
V-4- ARE YOU
Findings Originating Passen
g passengers iss old; 35 perceven percent arnistered to peo
ELECT YOUR A
ntStatuschart of the emoyed full-time.king for work;oyed passengecent state “oth
U: (N=8,195)
nger Survey
s displayed in ent are betweee 65 or older.ople with a mi
GE BRACKET.
mployment stat. Six percent o; this categoryers – those lookher” as their em
Figure IV-3. en the ages of 3Nearly 30 pernimum age of
( N=8,234)
tus of the origof passengers
y includes peopking for workmployment.
The largest su35 to 49 and 2rcent are betwef 16.
ginating passenare employedple who are un– is low at tw
ubgroups of pa29 percent areeen 16 and 34
ngers. The mapart-time. Te
npaid caregivewo percent. T
P a
assengers are e between the a
years old. Th
ajority of passeen percent areers or retired.
Three percent a
a g e | 31
ages of he
engers not The
are
Summary2015 Dalla
IV.4 EThe survWhite anup 10 peand Nati
FIGURE IV
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
Ethnicityvey asked passnd the next larercent of the paive Hawaiian/
V-5- ARE YOU
Findings Originating Passen
sengers their etrgest subgroupassengers survPacific Island
U: ( N=8,218)
nger Survey
thnicity; their p is Black/ Afrveyed, six perder and “Other”
responses are rican Americanrcent are Asian” make up one
presented in Fn (12 percent)n, two percent e percent each
Figure IV-5. S). Hispanic/ LAmerican Ind
h of the passen
P a
Sixty-eight perLatino passengedian/ Alaska Nnger responden
a g e | 32
rcent are ers make
Native, nts.
Summary2015 Dalla
V. H
V.1 H
We askeprovidedvehicles percent hpercent o
TABLE V-
FIGURE V
V.1Tablepassemost
A
M
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
Househol
Household
ed passengers d in Table V-1per household
have two vehicof respondents
-1- HOW MAN
V-1- HOW MA
.1 Househe V-2 presentsengers who rescommon mod
Average – 2.3
Median – 2.0
Findings Originating Passen
ld Demog
Vehicles
“How many v1 and Figure Vd. One percencles, and twens have five or m
NY VEHICLES AR
NY VEHICLES A
hold Vehis cross tabulatiside in the statde of transporta
nger Survey
graphics
vehicles are avV-1. The averant don’t have anty percent havmore vehicles
RE AVAILABLE I
ARE AVAILABLE
cles by Mion data by moe of Texas. Foation to the air
vailable in youage was 2.3 veany householdve three vehicl available in h
N YOUR HOUS
IN YOUR HOUS
Mode ode of transporor each categorport was using
ur household?”ehicles per ho
d vehicles. Eigles. Six percehis/her househ
EHOLD? ( N=
SEHOLD? ( N=
rtation and nuory of number g a private veh
” A presentatiousehold and thghteen percentnt have four vold.
=7,504)
=7,504)
umber of vehicof vehicles in
hicle.
P a
on of the resphe median wat have one veh
vehicles and th
cles by househn the household
a g e | 33
onses is as 2.0 hicle, 52 hree
hold for d, the
Summary2015 Dalla
TABLE
V.2 HThe survFigure V2.0 peop
TABLE V-
FIGURE V
Mod
Priva
Rent
Hote
Dart
Taxi
Airp
Ride
Char
Othe
Sam
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
E V-2- HOUSEH
Householdvey asked passV-2 represent aple. The larges
-3- HOW MAN
V-2- HOW MA
de of Transpo
ate vehicle
tal vehicle
el/motel shu
t light rail/ bu
/ limousine
port shuttle
esharing (Ube
rter/ organize
er
mple Size
Average – 2.
Median – 2.0
Findings Originating Passen
HOLD VEHICLE
Sizesengers “Includa summary of t subgroup (38
NY PEOPLE LIVE
NY PEOPLE LIV
ortation
5
4
ttle
us
er)
ed bus
8
0
nger Survey
ES AND MODE
ding yourself,the responses
8 percent) is tw
E IN YOUR HOUS
E IN YOUR HOU
0 1
54% 49%
46% 22%
0% 11%
0% 3%
0% 9%
0% 1%
0% 4%
0% 0%
0% 1%
2 10
Nu
OF TRANSPO
how many pe to the questiowo people. On
SEHOLD? ( N=
USEHOLD? ( N
1 2
% 47%
% 16%
% 12%
% 1%
% 14%
% 4%
% 5%
% 1%
% 1%
01 274
umber of Ve
ORTATION – T
eople live in yoon. The averagnly 13 percent
=7,488)
N=7,488)
3
60%
20%
7%
0%
7%
3%
3%
0%
0%
101
hicles in Hou
TEXAS RESIDENT
our householdge was 2.8 peot of responden
4 5
60%
17%
8%
0%
0%
12%
3%
0%
0%
34
usehold
P a
TS (N=536)
d?” Table V-3ople and the mnts live alone.
5 or more
34%
10%
30%
4%
0%
10%
11%
0%
0%
24
a g e | 34
and median
Summary2015 Dalla
Table V-alone traalone is
TABLE V-
V.3 AThe survpresentedreportingpercent rThirteen
FIGURE V( N=6,0
V.3Crosshouseand a
Travel
Mor
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
-4 shows a croavel alone. Forsignificantly s
-4- TRAVEL PAR
AnnualIncvey asked passd in Figure V-g incomes of $report incomes
n percent repor
V-3- WHICH C
066)
.1 Incomes tabulation anehold annual ianother 30 per
Party Size:
1
2
3
4
5
re than 5
Findings Originating Passen
oss-tabulation or passengers wmaller at five t
RTY SIZE AND HO
omesengers to prov-3. Half of the$150,000 or ms between $75rt incomes of l
CATEGORY BEST
e by Trip nalysis reveals ncomes. Thirtcent report inc
1
11%
64%
10%
10%
1%
4%
nger Survey
of travel party who live in a hoto six percent.
OW MANY PEO
vide their annue passengers re
more and 26% r5,000 and $99,ess than $50,0
T DESCRIBES YO
Purpose the majority o
ty percent of bcomes between
2 3
6% 6%
74% 54
11% 27
6% 8%
1% 1%
2% 3%
# of People
size and housousehold of tw
PLE LIVE IN YO
ual gross houseport househoreporting inco999 and 18%
000.
OUR TOTAL AN
of passengers tbusiness passen $100,000 an
3 4
% 5%
4% 58%
7% 18%
% 14%
% 2%
% 3%
e Living in Yo
sehold size. Elwo or more peo
UR HOUSEHOL
sehold income;old incomes ofomes between
report income
NUAL HOUSEH
traveling for bengers report innd $149,999. T
5
5%
% 43%
% 21%
% 9%
14%
8%
our Househol
leven percent oople, the perce
LD? ( N=7,48
; the responsesf $100,000 or m$100,000 and
es of $50,000 t
OLD INCOME
business relatencomes of $15The percentag
More than
5%
61%
14%
8%
5%
7%
d
P a
of passengers wentage of those
8)
s to this questimore with 24%$149,999. Ni
to $74,999 ann
(BEFORE TAXES
ed reasons have50,000 or morge of passenger
n 5
a g e | 35
who live e traveling
ion are % ineteen nually.
S)?
e high re rs
Summary2015 Dalla
trave20 peincomreasoV-4.
FIGUR
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
ling for non-bercent have incmes under $25ons (8%) have
RE V-4- TOTAL
Findings Originating Passen
usiness relatedcomes between,000. Meanwincomes of le
ANNUAL HOU
nger Survey
d purposes is sn $100,000 an
while a larger pss than $25,00
SEHOLD INCO
smaller: 17 pernd $149,999. Opercentage of p00. The full cr
ME AND TRIP P
rcent have incOnly two percpassengers travross tabulation
PURPOSE (N=
comes of $150cent of businesveling for nonn analysis can
6,066)
P a
0,000 or more ass passengers rn-business rela
be seen in Fig
a g e | 36
and report
ated gure
Summary2015 Dalla
V.4 HAfter UnTexas - Odefined aresides inDFW Mreside ou
FIGURE V
y of Results and Fas Fort‐Worth O
HomeLocanison geocodeOutside Metroas a 12 countynside the DFW
Metroplex. Thirutside of the U
V-5- WHERE IS
Findings Originating Passen
ationd home addres
oplex, US (noty area, and is dW Metroplex. rty-seven perc
U.S. The break
YOUR HOME R
nger Survey
ss, they categot Texas), and Indescribed in SeAnother nine
cent of passengkdown of the re
RESIDENCE? (N
orized responsnternational (Oection II.8. Thpercent reside
gers reside outesponses is dis
N=8,379)
ses into four caOutside of thehe largest subge inside the sttside of Texassplayed in Fig
ategories: insidU.S.). The D
group (49 perctate of Texas bs in another sta
gure V-5.
P a
de DFW MetrDFW Metroplexcent) of passenbut outside of tate, and five p
a g e | 37
roplex, x was
ngers the
percent
Summary of Results and Findings 2015 Dallas Fort‐Worth Originating Passenger Survey P a g e | 38
Appendix A- Survey Questionnaire
04-2
7-20
16
Pag
e 1
Nbr
Que
stio
nN
ame
/ Typ
eH
eade
r | Q
uest
ion
Text
Cho
ices
(ital
ic fo
r ran
dom
ized
cho
ices
)Br
anch
ing
and
Ski
p P
atte
rns
001
Airl
ine
/ Sin
gle
Wha
t airl
ine
are
you
flyin
g w
ith to
day?
[1] A
mer
ican
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
] Aer
omex
ico
Nex
t Que
stio
n[3
] Air
Can
ada
Nex
t Que
stio
n[4
] Ala
ska
Nex
t Que
stio
n[5
] Avi
anca
Nex
t Que
stio
n[6
] Brit
ish
Airw
ays
Nex
t Que
stio
n[7
] Del
taN
ext Q
uest
ion
[8] E
mira
tes
Nex
t Que
stio
n[9
] Etih
adN
ext Q
uest
ion
[10]
Fro
ntie
rN
ext Q
uest
ion
[11]
Jet
Blu
eN
ext Q
uest
ion
[12]
KLM
Nex
t Que
stio
n[1
3] K
orea
nN
ext Q
uest
ion
[14]
Luf
than
saN
ext Q
uest
ion
[15]
Qua
ntas
Nex
t Que
stio
n[1
6] Q
atar
Nex
t Que
stio
n[1
7] S
pirit
Nex
t Que
stio
n[1
8] S
un C
ount
ryN
ext Q
uest
ion
[19]
Uni
ted
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
0] U
S A
irway
sN
ext Q
uest
ion
[21]
Vol
aris
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
2] W
estJ
etN
ext Q
uest
ion
[23]
Oth
erN
ext Q
uest
ion
002
Am
eric
an fl
ight
s /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: a
a_ja
n.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
003
Air C
anad
a fli
ghts
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
Wha
t is
your
flig
ht n
umbe
r?(F
ileN
ame:
air
cana
da fl
ight
s.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
004
Aer
o m
exic
o fli
ghts
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
Wha
t is
your
flig
ht n
umbe
r?(F
ileN
ame:
aer
omex
ico
fligh
ts.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
005
Ala
ska
fligh
ts /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: a
lask
a fli
ghts
.txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
006
Avia
nca
Flig
hts
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
Wha
t is
your
flig
ht n
umbe
r?(F
ileN
ame:
avi
anca
flig
hts.
txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
007
Brit
ish
fligh
ts /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: b
ritis
h fli
ghts
.txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
008
Del
ta fl
ight
s /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: d
l_ja
n.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
009
Em
irate
s fli
ghts
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
Wha
t is
your
flig
ht n
umbe
r?(F
ileN
ame:
em
irate
s fli
ghts
.txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
010
Etih
ad fl
ight
s /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: e
tihad
flig
hts.
txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
Pow
ered
by
DIG
IVE
Y™ L
icen
sed
to --
not d
efin
ed--
DFWFINALSURVEYQUESTIONNAIRE
04-2
7-20
16
Pag
e 2
Nbr
Que
stio
nN
ame
/ Typ
eH
eade
r | Q
uest
ion
Text
Cho
ices
(ital
ic fo
r ran
dom
ized
cho
ices
)Br
anch
ing
and
Ski
p P
atte
rns
011
Fron
tier f
light
s /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: fr
ontie
r flig
hts.
txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
012
JetB
lue
fligh
ts /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: je
t blu
e fli
ghts
.txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
013
KLM
flig
hts
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
Wha
t is
your
flig
ht n
umbe
r?(F
ileN
ame:
klm
flig
hts.
txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
014
Kore
an fl
ight
s /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: k
orea
n fli
ghts
.txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
015
Lufth
ansa
flig
hts
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
Wha
t is
your
flig
ht n
umbe
r?(F
ileN
ame:
lufta
nsa
fligh
ts.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
016
Qan
tas
fligh
ts /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: q
anta
s fli
ghts
.txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
017
Qat
ar fl
ight
s /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: q
atar
flig
hts.
txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
018
Spi
rit fl
ight
s /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: s
pirit
_jan
.txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
019
Sun
Cou
ntry
flig
hts
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
Wha
t is
your
flig
ht n
umbe
r?(F
ileN
ame:
sun
cou
ntry
_jan
.txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
020
Uni
ted
fligh
ts /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: u
a_ja
n.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
021
US
airw
ays
fligh
ts /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tW
hat i
s yo
ur fl
ight
num
ber?
(File
Nam
e: a
a_ja
n.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
022
Vol
aris
flig
hts
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
Wha
t is
your
flig
ht n
umbe
r?(F
ileN
ame:
vol
aris
flig
hts.
txt)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
023
Wes
t Jet
flig
hts
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
Wha
t is
your
flig
ht n
umbe
r?(F
ileN
ame:
wes
tjet f
light
s.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
024
Con
nect
ing
/ Sin
gle
Are
you
sta
rting
you
r trip
her
e at
this
airp
ort o
rco
nnec
ting
from
ano
ther
flig
ht?
[1] S
tarti
ng h
ere
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
] Con
nect
ing
from
ano
ther
flig
htE
nd o
f Sur
vey
025
Fina
l des
tinat
ion
/ Sin
gle
Wha
t airp
ort i
s yo
ur F
INAL
des
tinat
ion?
[1] A
noth
er U
.S. A
irpor
tN
ext Q
uest
ion
[2] O
utsi
de U
.S.
Out
side
U.S
des
t02
6U
S A
irpor
t des
t /Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
Wha
t U.S
. airp
ort i
s yo
ur F
INA
L de
stin
atio
n?(F
ileN
ame:
airp
ort_
list_
2015
.txt)
Trip
Orig
inat
ion
027
Out
side
U.S
des
t /Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
In w
hat c
ount
ry is
you
r FIN
AL
dest
inat
ion
airp
ort
loca
ted?
(File
Nam
e: w
orld
cou
ntrie
s_20
15.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
028
Trip
Orig
inat
ion
/ Sin
gle
YO
UR
STA
RTI
NG
LO
CA
TIO
N |
Whe
re d
id y
ouco
me
from
prio
r to
arriv
ing
at th
e ai
rpor
t tod
ay?
[1] M
y ho
me
Orig
in D
alla
s M
SA
[2] S
omeo
ne e
lse'
s re
side
nce
(frie
nd/fa
mily
/rent
al)
Orig
in D
alla
s M
SA
[3] W
ork/
Bus
ines
s/ C
ompa
ny (a
pla
ce o
f wor
k)O
rigin
Dal
las
MS
A[4
] Hot
el/M
otel
Orig
in D
alla
s M
SA
[5] D
alla
s C
onve
ntio
n C
ente
rH
ome
info
[6] O
ther
Nex
t Que
stio
n02
9Tr
ip O
rigin
iatio
n - O
ther
/V
erba
timW
hat o
ther
loca
tion?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 0
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 300
)N
ext Q
uest
ion
Pow
ered
by
DIG
IVE
Y™ L
icen
sed
to --
not d
efin
ed--
04-2
7-20
16
Pag
e 3
Nbr
Que
stio
nN
ame
/ Typ
eH
eade
r | Q
uest
ion
Text
Cho
ices
(ital
ic fo
r ran
dom
ized
cho
ices
)Br
anch
ing
and
Ski
p P
atte
rns
030
Orig
in D
alla
s M
SA
/Si
ngle
WIT
HIN
100
MIL
ES
OF
AIR
PO
RT
| Is
this
loca
tion
in th
e D
alla
s Fo
rt W
orth
Met
ropl
ex a
rea?
[1] Y
ES
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
] NO
Out
side
Dal
las
MS
A[3
] Don
't kn
owN
ext Q
uest
ion
031
Type
of i
nfo
/ Sin
gle
To im
prov
e ac
cess
to th
e ai
rpor
t, w
e ne
ed to
kno
wyo
ur s
tarti
ng lo
catio
n. W
hat c
an y
ou p
rovi
de:
[1] A
ddre
ssN
ext Q
uest
ion
[2] C
ross
Stre
ets
and
City
Sta
rting
Loc
atio
n cr
oss
..[3
] Nam
e of
Lan
dmar
k/ B
usin
ess/
Hot
el a
nd C
ityS
tarti
ng L
ocat
ion
land
m..
032
Star
ting
Loca
tion
addr
ess
/ Num
eric
INFO
RM
ATI
ON
WIL
L O
NLY
BE
US
ED
BY
TH
ETE
XA
S C
OU
NC
IL O
F G
OV
ER
NM
EN
TS F
OR
TH
ISS
TUD
Y |
Wha
t is
the
addr
ess
num
ber?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 0
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 7)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
033
Star
ting
Loca
tion
cros
sst
reet
/ Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
INFO
RM
ATI
ON
WIL
L O
NLY
BE
US
ED
BY
TH
ETE
XA
S C
OU
NC
IL O
F G
OV
ER
NM
EN
TS F
OR
TH
ISS
TUD
Y |
Wha
t is
the
stre
et n
ame?
(File
Nam
e: D
AL_
Roa
ds-V
2.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
034
Star
ting
Loca
tion
cros
sst
reet
(1) /
INFO
RM
ATI
ON
WIL
L O
NLY
BE
US
ED
BY
TH
ETE
XA
S C
OU
NC
IL O
F G
OV
ER
NM
EN
TS F
OR
TH
ISS
TUD
Y |
Wha
t is
the
OTH
ER
stre
et n
ame?
(File
Nam
e: D
AL_
Roa
ds-V
2.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
035
Star
ting
Loca
tion
land
mar
k / V
erba
timIN
FOR
MA
TIO
N W
ILL
ON
LY B
E U
SE
D B
Y T
HE
TEX
AS
CO
UN
CIL
OF
GO
VE
RN
ME
NTS
FO
R T
HIS
STU
DY
| W
hat i
s th
e na
me
of th
e lo
catio
n?B
usin
ess,
hot
el/m
otel
, lan
dmar
k, a
ttrac
tion,
pub
licbu
ildin
g
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 0
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 300
)N
ext Q
uest
ion
036
Sta
rting
loca
tion
city
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
INFO
RM
ATI
ON
WIL
L O
NLY
BE
US
ED
BY
TH
ETE
XA
S C
OU
NC
IL O
F G
OV
ER
NM
EN
TS F
OR
TH
ISS
TUD
Y |
Wha
t is
the
nam
e of
the
city
?
(File
Nam
e: D
AL_
Citi
es_v
2.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
037
Zip
code
/ N
umer
icIN
FOR
MA
TIO
N W
ILL
ON
LY B
E U
SE
D B
Y T
HE
TEX
AS
CO
UN
CIL
OF
GO
VE
RN
ME
NTS
FO
R T
HIS
STU
DY
| W
hat i
s th
e zi
p co
de?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 5
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 5)
INTE
RV
IEW
ER
US
E
038
Out
side
Dal
las
MS
A /
Ver
batim
INFO
RM
ATI
ON
WIL
L O
NLY
BE
US
ED
BY
TH
ETE
XA
S C
OU
NC
IL O
F G
OV
ER
NM
EN
TS F
OR
TH
ISS
TUD
Y |
Whe
re is
this
loca
tion?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 0
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 300
)N
ext Q
uest
ion
039
INTE
RV
IEW
ER
US
E /
Sing
leIS
INFO
RM
ATI
ON
CO
MP
LETE
? |
INTE
RV
IEW
ER
'S U
SE
ON
LY[1
] Yes
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
] No
End
of S
urve
y04
0H
ome
info
/ S
ingl
eW
here
do
you
live?
[1] T
exas
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
] Oth
er U
.S. S
tate
Sta
te o
f res
iden
ce[3
] Out
side
U.S
.C
ount
ry o
f res
iden
ce04
1H
ome
zip
code
/ N
umer
icIN
FOR
MA
TIO
N W
ILL
ON
LY B
E U
SE
D B
Y T
HE
TEX
AS
CO
UN
CIL
OF
GO
VE
RN
ME
NTS
FO
R T
HIS
STU
DY
| W
hat i
s yo
ur h
ome
zip
code
?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 5
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 5)
Pur
pose
of T
rave
l
042
Sta
te o
f res
iden
ce /
Item
Sel
ectio
nLis
tIN
FOR
MA
TIO
N W
ILL
ON
LY B
E U
SE
D B
Y T
HE
TEX
AS
CO
UN
CIL
OF
GO
VE
RN
ME
NTS
FO
R T
HIS
STU
DY
| In
wha
t sta
te d
o yo
u liv
e?
(File
Nam
e: S
tate
_lis
t.txt
)P
urpo
se o
f Tra
vel
043
Cou
ntry
of r
esid
ence
/Ite
mS
elec
tionL
ist
In w
hich
cou
ntry
do
you
live?
(File
Nam
e: w
orld
cou
ntrie
s_20
15.tx
t)N
ext Q
uest
ion
Pow
ered
by
DIG
IVE
Y™ L
icen
sed
to --
not d
efin
ed--
04-2
7-20
16
Pag
e 4
Nbr
Que
stio
nN
ame
/ Typ
eH
eade
r | Q
uest
ion
Text
Cho
ices
(ital
ic fo
r ran
dom
ized
cho
ices
)Br
anch
ing
and
Ski
p P
atte
rns
044
Pur
pose
of T
rave
l /Si
ngle
Wha
t is
the
prim
ary
purp
ose
of y
our t
rip?
[1] B
usin
ess
rela
ted
(incl
udes
conf
eren
ces/
conv
entio
ns)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
[2] V
acat
ion/
plea
sure
Nex
t Que
stio
n[3
] Vis
it fa
mily
/ frie
nds
Nex
t Que
stio
n[4
] Tra
vel t
o/ fr
om c
olle
geN
ext Q
uest
ion
[5] M
ilitar
yN
ext Q
uest
ion
[6] O
ther
Nex
t Que
stio
n04
5O
ther
pur
pose
/ V
erba
timW
hat i
s th
e ot
her r
easo
n?(M
inim
um D
igits
: 0)
(Max
imum
Dig
its: 3
00)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
046
Trav
el ti
me
/ Num
eric
FRO
M T
HE
TIM
E Y
OU
LE
FT Y
OU
R S
TAR
TIN
GLO
CA
TIO
N T
O T
HE
TIM
E Y
OU
CA
ME
TO
TH
ETE
RM
INA
L | H
ow m
any
min
utes
did
it ta
ke to
trav
elto
the
airp
ort t
oday
?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 1
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 3)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
047
Arriv
ing
Tran
spor
tatio
n /
Sing
leW
hat w
as y
our p
rimar
y m
ode
of tr
ansp
orta
tion
toth
e ai
rpor
t?[1
] Priv
ate
vehi
cle
(car
, van
, mot
orcy
cle)
Priv
ate
Par
king
[2] R
enta
l veh
icle
Rei
mbu
rsem
ent
[3] H
otel
/Mot
el s
huttl
e or
cou
rtesy
van
Trav
el D
urat
ion
[4] D
AR
T lig
ht ra
il/bu
sR
easo
ns fo
r tra
ns p
ref
[5] T
axi/L
imou
sine
Rei
mbu
rsem
ent
[6] A
irpor
t Shu
ttle
(Sup
er S
huttl
e, P
rime
Tim
e)R
eim
burs
emen
t[7
] Rid
esha
ring
Ser
vice
(Ube
r, Ly
ft, S
idec
ar, e
tc.)
Rei
mbu
rsem
ent
[8] C
harte
r bus
/ org
aniz
ed b
usTr
avel
Dur
atio
n[9
] Oth
erN
ext Q
uest
ion
048
Arriv
ing
Tran
spor
tatio
n -
Oth
er /
Ver
batim
Wha
t OTH
ER
mod
e of
tran
spor
tatio
n di
d yo
u us
eto
get
to th
e ai
rpor
t?(M
inim
um D
igits
: 0)
(Max
imum
Dig
its: 3
00)
Rei
mbu
rsem
ent
049
Priv
ate
Par
king
/ S
ingl
eW
here
is th
e ca
r par
ked?
[1] D
idn'
t par
k - I
was
dro
pped
off
Rea
sons
for t
rans
pre
f[2
] DFW
Ter
min
al G
arag
eR
easo
ns fo
r Par
king
Pre
f[3
] DFW
Exp
ress
(Nor
th/S
outh
Par
king
)R
easo
ns fo
r Par
king
Pre
f[4
] DFW
Rem
ote/
Eco
nom
y P
arki
ngR
easo
ns fo
r Par
king
Pre
f[5
] DFW
Airp
ort V
alet
Rea
sons
for P
arki
ng P
ref
[6] P
arki
ng S
pot
Rea
sons
for P
arki
ng P
ref
[7] P
ark
and
Fly
Rea
sons
for P
arki
ng P
ref
[8] S
wift
Par
kR
easo
ns fo
r Par
king
Pre
f[9
] Oth
er L
otN
ext Q
uest
ion
050
Priv
ate
Par
king
- O
ther
/V
erba
timW
hat O
THE
R p
arki
ng lo
t did
you
use
?(M
inim
um D
igits
: 0)
(Max
imum
Dig
its: 3
00)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
Pow
ered
by
DIG
IVE
Y™ L
icen
sed
to --
not d
efin
ed--
04-2
7-20
16
Pag
e 5
Nbr
Que
stio
nN
ame
/ Typ
eH
eade
r | Q
uest
ion
Text
Cho
ices
(ital
ic fo
r ran
dom
ized
cho
ices
)Br
anch
ing
and
Ski
p P
atte
rns
051
Rea
sons
for P
arki
ng P
ref
/ Mul
ti N
orm
alS
elec
t all
that
app
ly, t
hen
pres
s N
EX
T | W
hy d
idyo
u pa
rk th
ere?
[1] C
omfo
rt an
d co
nven
ienc
e[2
] Lac
k of
tim
e/W
as ru
nnin
g la
te[3
] Cos
t[4
] Siz
e of
trav
el p
arty
[5] N
umbe
r of l
ugga
ges
[6] C
over
ed p
arki
ng[7
] Tra
vel t
ime
[8] O
ther
(Min
: 0, M
ax: 0
, Exc
lusi
ve: 0
)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
052
Rea
sons
for P
arki
ng P
ref
- Oth
er /
Ver
batim
Wha
t is
the
OTH
ER
reas
on?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 0
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 300
)N
ext Q
uest
ion
053
Par
king
cos
t / N
umer
icP
LEA
SE
PR
OV
IDE
BE
ST
ES
TIM
ATE
| H
ow m
uch
will
you
pay
for p
arki
ng p
er d
ay?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 1
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 3)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
054
Rei
mbu
rsem
ent /
Sin
gle
Will
you
get r
eim
burs
ed fo
r tra
nspo
rtatio
n or
park
ing?
[1] Y
esN
ext Q
uest
ion
[2] N
oR
easo
ns fo
r tra
ns p
ref
055
Per
cent
_rei
mbu
rsem
ent /
Num
eric
Wha
t % o
f tra
nspo
rtatio
n or
par
king
will
you
get
reim
burs
ed?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 1
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 3)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
056
Rea
sons
for t
rans
pre
f /M
ulti
Nor
mal
Sel
ect a
ll th
at a
pply
, the
n pr
ess
NE
XT
| Why
did
you
choo
se th
is m
ode
of tr
ansp
orta
tion?
[1] T
rave
l tim
e[2
] Rel
iabi
lity
[3] L
ack
of ti
me/
Was
runn
ing
late
[4] C
ost
[5] S
ize
of tr
avel
par
ty[6
] Com
fort
and
conv
enie
nce
[7] N
umbe
r of l
ugga
ges
[8] P
erso
nal p
refe
renc
e[9
] Per
sona
l veh
icle
was
not
ava
ilabl
e[1
0] O
ther
(Min
: 0, M
ax: 0
, Exc
lusi
ve: 0
)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
057
Rea
sons
for t
rans
pre
fot
her /
Ver
batim
Wha
t is
the
othe
r rea
son?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 0
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 300
)N
ext Q
uest
ion
058
Trav
el D
urat
ion
/ Sin
gle
How
man
y da
ys h
ave
you
or w
ill yo
u be
aw
ay fr
omho
me
on th
is tr
ip?
[1] 1
day
or l
ess
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
] 2-3
day
sN
ext Q
uest
ion
[3] 4
-5 d
ays
Nex
t Que
stio
n[4
] Mor
e th
an 5
day
sN
ext Q
uest
ion
059
Trav
elin
g A
lone
/ S
ingl
eD
id y
ou c
ome
to th
e ai
rpor
t alo
ne to
day?
[1] N
o - t
rave
ling
with
oth
ers
or o
ther
s ca
me
to s
eem
e of
fN
ext Q
uest
ion
[2] Y
es -
trave
ling
alon
eG
ende
r06
0Tr
avel
ing
Par
ty /
Sin
gle
How
man
y pe
ople
are
trav
elin
g w
ith y
ou (i
nclu
ding
your
self)
?[1
] 1W
ell w
ishe
r[2
] 2W
ell w
ishe
r[3
] 3W
ell w
ishe
r[4
] 4W
ell w
ishe
r[5
] 5W
ell w
ishe
r[6
] Mor
e th
an 5
Nex
t Que
stio
nP
ower
ed b
y D
IGIV
EY™
Lic
ense
d to
--no
t def
ined
--
04-2
7-20
16
Pag
e 6
Nbr
Que
stio
nN
ame
/ Typ
eH
eade
r | Q
uest
ion
Text
Cho
ices
(ital
ic fo
r ran
dom
ized
cho
ices
)Br
anch
ing
and
Ski
p P
atte
rns
061
Trav
elin
g P
arty
out
of
DA
L / N
umer
icIF
MO
RE
TH
AN
5 (I
NC
LUD
ING
YO
UR
SE
LF) |
How
man
y pe
ople
are
trav
elin
g w
ith y
ou?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 1
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 2)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
062
Wel
l wis
her /
Sin
gle
How
man
y pe
ople
cam
e to
the
airp
ort t
o se
e yo
uof
f tod
ay?
[1] N
one
One
Veh
icle
[2] 1
One
Veh
icle
[3] 2
One
Veh
icle
[4] 3
One
Veh
icle
[5] 4
One
Veh
icle
[6] 5
One
Veh
icle
[7] M
ore
than
5N
ext Q
uest
ion
063
Trav
el N
o / N
umer
icIF
MO
RE
TH
AN
5 |
How
man
y pe
ople
cam
e to
the
airp
ort s
ee y
ou o
ff to
day?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 1
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 2)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
064
One
Veh
icle
/ S
ingl
eD
id y
our p
arty
com
e to
the
airp
ort i
n on
e ve
hicl
e?[1
] Yes
Gen
der
[2] N
oN
ext Q
uest
ion
065
Num
ber o
f Veh
icle
s /
Num
eric
How
man
y ve
hicl
es d
id y
ou u
se to
com
e to
the
airp
ort?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 1
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 2)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
066
Gen
der /
Sin
gle
Wha
t is
your
gen
der?
[1] M
ale
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
] Fem
ale
Nex
t Que
stio
n06
7A
ge B
rack
et /
Sin
gle
Ple
ase
sele
ct y
our a
ge b
rack
et:
[1] 1
6-18
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
] 19-
24N
ext Q
uest
ion
[3] 2
5-34
Nex
t Que
stio
n[4
] 35-
49N
ext Q
uest
ion
[5] 5
0-64
Nex
t Que
stio
n[6
] 65
or o
lder
Nex
t Que
stio
n06
8E
mpl
oym
ent /
Sin
gle
Are
you
?[1
] Em
ploy
ed, F
ull t
ime
Eth
nici
ty[2
] Em
ploy
ed, P
art t
ime
Eth
nici
ty[3
] Not
Em
ploy
ed, L
ooki
ng fo
r wor
kE
thni
city
[4] N
ot E
mpl
oyed
, Not
Loo
king
for w
ork
(retir
ed,
fam
ily/h
ouse
hold
car
e gi
ver,
etc.
)E
thni
city
[5] S
tude
ntE
thni
city
[6] O
ther
Nex
t Que
stio
n06
9E
mpl
oym
ent -
Oth
er /
Ver
batim
Wha
t OTH
ER
em
ploy
men
t sta
tus
are
you?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 0
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 300
)N
ext Q
uest
ion
070
Eth
nici
ty /
Sin
gle
Are
you
:[1
] Am
eric
an In
dian
/Ala
ska
Nat
ive
Peo
ple
Livi
ng a
t Hom
e[2
] Asi
anP
eopl
e Li
ving
at H
ome
[3] B
lack
/Afri
can
Am
eric
anP
eopl
e Li
ving
at H
ome
[4] H
ispa
nic/
Latin
oP
eopl
e Li
ving
at H
ome
[5] N
ativ
e H
awai
ian/
Pac
ific
Isla
nder
Peo
ple
Livi
ng a
t Hom
e[6
] Whi
teP
eopl
e Li
ving
at H
ome
[7] O
ther
Nex
t Que
stio
n07
1E
thni
city
- O
ther
/V
erba
timW
hat O
THE
R e
thni
city
are
you
?(M
inim
um D
igits
: 0)
(Max
imum
Dig
its: 3
00)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
072
Peop
le L
ivin
g at
Hom
e /
Num
eric
INC
LUD
ING
YO
UR
SE
LF |
How
man
y pe
ople
live
in y
our h
ouse
hold
?(M
inim
um D
igits
: 0)
(Max
imum
Dig
its: 2
)N
ext Q
uest
ion
Pow
ered
by
DIG
IVE
Y™ L
icen
sed
to --
not d
efin
ed--
04-2
7-20
16
Pag
e 7
Nbr
Que
stio
nN
ame
/ Typ
eH
eade
r | Q
uest
ion
Text
Cho
ices
(ital
ic fo
r ran
dom
ized
cho
ices
)Br
anch
ing
and
Ski
p P
atte
rns
073
Hou
seho
ld V
ehic
les
/N
umer
icH
ow m
any
vehi
cles
are
ava
ilabl
e in
you
rho
useh
old?
(Min
imum
Dig
its: 0
)(M
axim
um D
igits
: 2)
Nex
t Que
stio
n
074
Ann
ual I
ncom
e / S
ingl
eW
hich
cat
egor
y be
st d
escr
ibes
you
r tot
al a
nnua
lho
useh
old
inco
me
(bef
ore
taxe
s):
[1] U
nder
$24
,999
Nex
t Que
stio
n[2
] $25
,000
-$49
,999
Nex
t Que
stio
n[3
] $50
,000
-$74
,999
Nex
t Que
stio
n[4
] $75
,000
-$99
,999
Nex
t Que
stio
n[5
] $10
0,00
0-$1
49,9
99N
ext Q
uest
ion
[6] $
150,
000
or m
ore
Nex
t Que
stio
n
Sur
vey
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
ject
Nam
e:D
FW_F
INA
L_20
16_0
1La
st ti
me
mod
ified
:10
-14-
2015
- 19
:58:
53A
uto
Forw
ard
Func
tion:
enab
led
Back
war
d Bu
tton:
enab
led
Tim
e-O
ut in
Sec
onds
:90
0La
ngua
ges:
sing
le la
ngua
ge
Pow
ered
by
DIG
IVE
Y™ L
icen
sed
to --
not d
efin
ed--
409 West Huron, Suite 400Chicago, IL 60654
(312) 988‐3360 Tel.(312) 988‐3370 Fax
www.unison‐ucg.com