some aspects of traceability of camshafts and large gears · some aspects of traceability of...
TRANSCRIPT
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Some aspects of traceability of camshafts
and large gears
Otto Jusko, Folke Santel, Frank Härtig, Waheed Adeyemi, Kerstin Rost, PTB Braunschweig, Germany
Raimund Volk / Hommel-Etamic GmbH, Schwenningen, Germany
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
topics
development and manufacturing of a camshaft standard
strategies for evaluating of cam profiles
estimation of measurement uncertainty
standardization
Contents – Part 1 camshaft meas.
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
cylinder coordinate shaft measuring instruments
1st meeting PTB / industry June 2005
profile shapes at steep surfaces
high-precison rotation axis
objectives
comparability of measurement results
traceability to national standards and SI system
acceptance tests
motivation
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
components
1 reference surface dealing as rotational datum
3 bearing surfaces L1, L2, and L3
2 excentric circular discs Ex1 und Ex2
2 cams N1, and N2
camshaft standard
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
measures
length = 300 mm
mass = 1,4 kg
hardness = 61 HRC
measurement parameters
Probing force = 2 N
camshaft standard
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
parameters
ϕN: cam rotational angle
hN: cam stroke
probing geometry
radius probe (disc)
flat probe (rod)
camshaft standard
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
function oriented evaluation
Starting with inlet …
… proceeding with outlet
alignment
coordinate system of drive
camshaft standard
cam zenith
cam rot. angle
ca
m s
tro
ke
H
dir. of rotation
h: cam stroke at ( rel. measure )
H: cam stroke (abs. measure)
main cam
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
application in machines / combustion engines
roller follower (circular)
flat follower
morphological filtering
moving point of contact
conversion
camshaft standard
roller follower
(rolling tap)
flat follower
(sliding tap)
cam profiles
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
measurement instruments
camshaft measuring instrument
form measuring instrument
hardness …
dimensional parameters
diameter
profile form
straightness / parallelism
roundness
…
camshaft standard - measurements
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
camshaft datums
manufacturing: live centers
engine: bearing surfaces
measurement
camshaft measuring instrument:
– live centers
form measuring instruments:
– centered
camshaft standard - measurements
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
form measuring instrument
centering to excenter
application of reversal procedure
parameters
roundness = 1,4 µm
straightness = 2,3 µm
… prototype values !
basic parameters
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
synthetic profiles
simple rule geometries
analytical computation possible
comparison procedure
evaluation as pseudo measurement
diff. pseudo measurement - theory
software validation
Reference result
Test data
Test software
Test result
Comparison test result vs. reference
PTB certificate
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
profile synthesis
circle segments and tangents
radius and angle offsets
sampling
“Probing“ of the synthetic profile
numerical profile as reference
Software test – test data
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
fitting procedure
angular position of cam
definitions required
Software test – reference software
Fitting angle
ref. curve
actual curve
Cam profile
speed profile
cam form deviation
area equality after alignment
Slope 100%
Slope 60 %
Slope 60 %Slope 100%
alignment areaalignment area
opening closing
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Software test – result example
data
set
Reference Datadifferences
error free parameters
intended errorBase-
Radius
[mm]
Cam
stroke
[mm]
Angle to
datum
[mm]
Base
Radius
[mm]
Cam
stroke
[mm]
datum
angle
[mm]
Base
circ-
[mm]
Base
circ+
[mm]
HN-
[mm]
HN+
[mm]
N2.1R 20,0000 5,0000 0,0000 none 0,0001 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 -0,0001 0,0001
N2.2R 20,0000 5,0000 14,0000 angle deviation 14° 0,0001 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 -0,0001 0,0001
N3.1R 18,0000 7,0000 0,0000 shrinked by 0.7 mm 0,0001 -0,0004 0,0000 -0,0004 -0,0003 -0,0004 -0,0003
N3.2R 18,0000 7,0000 0,0000 Inflated by 0.4 mm 0,0001 0,0001 0,0000 0,0001 0,0001 0,0000 0,0001
N4.1R 16,0000 7,0000 0,0000alternating positive and negative
deviations of ±0.3 mm-0,0001 0,0001 0,0000 0,0001 0,0001 0,0001 0,0002
N5.1R 23,0000 5,0000 0,0000 cam stroke increased by 1,3 mm 0,0001 -0,0002 0,0000 -0,0001 -0,0001 -0,0001 -0,0001
N5.2R 23,0000 5,0000 0,0000 cam stroke decreased by 0,8 mm 0,0001 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
N6.1R 15,0000 6,0000 0,0000 flank circles shrinked by 0.9 mm 0,0001 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0001
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
challenges
global production has to deliver the same results
various measurement instruments may be applied
missing definitions
coordination of users and manufacturers
agreement for mandatory evaluation methods
draft as (inter)national standard
comparison measurements with camshaft standards
standardization
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Part II – Large gear standard
Background
Economic Importance of Large Gears
Assuring the Quality of Large Gears
Measuring Instruments
Importance of Measurement Uncertainty
Concepts of Traceability
Motivation
Establishing a reliable and economically efficient quality control
Realization
Large Gear Measurement Standard
First measurement results
Concepts of evaluating the measurement uncertainty in industry
Experimental uncertainty budget
VCMM-Gear: Monte-Carlo Simulation
Conclusion & Outlook
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Economic Impact of Large Gears
2008:
Worldwide total wind energy capacity: 120 800 MW
Min. 36,000 Wind Turbine Generators (WTG) worldwide
(Germany alone: 20 000)
Approx. 75 % equipped with gearboxes
2012:
Worldwide total wind energy capacity: 300 000 MW
(DEWI scenario)
Growing market for new WTG and therefore gearboxes
Increasing demand for large gears
Gear diameters up to 3000 mm
Sourc
e: H
eadhuey,
Wik
imedia
Com
mons, Lic
ence: G
NU
fdl
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Economic impact of large gears
Sourc
e: H
eadhuey,
Wik
imedia
Com
mons, Lic
ence: G
NU
fdl
Wind Turbine Generators
Designed life expectancy 20 years – Operating time 13 years
Highly reliable, low-maintenance gear box
Smooth, quiet running, low noise emission
High-quality gears, especially for offshore-turbines
Required tolerances:
Some 10 µm for major gear specifications
ISO 1328-1:1995
d = 1000 mm, b = 400 mm, mn = 20 mm, accuracy grade 5:
F = 21 µm, Fβ = 18 µm
Even stricter requirements for inspection processes
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Quality assurance of large gears
Measuring Instruments
Coordinate Measuring Machines
Gear Measuring Instruments
Gears:
Standard measuring task
Modern instruments:
Gear maximum dimensions:
diameter: 3 800 mm
height: 2 000 mm
weight: 20 000 kg
Larger gears:
special applications
Challenges for large gears
Alignment, deformation
Reliable Measurements needed
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Designing a large gear standard
Design parameters
Industrial requirements
Limited measuring facilities at PTB
Expanded measurement uncertainty less than U(k=2)=5 µm for involute profile
and helix slope deviations
Segmentation allows easy handling and shipping
Dismountable countermass for symmetric weight distribution
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Quality assurance of large gears
Parameter Value
Number of teeth z 38
Normal module mn 20 mm
Pressure angle n 20°
Face width b 400 mm
Helix angle β / hand 0°/spur; 10°/R; 20°/L
Outside diameter da 1000 mm
Weight 450 kg (700 kg)
Reference bands diameter
(form deviation)
200 mm (1 µm)
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Large gear standard during meas.
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Commercial gear standard
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
First measurements
Flankenlinie 0° Rechtsflanke
Helix 0° right flank
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
-400 -350 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0
Zahnbreite in mm
Facewidth in mm
Fla
nken
lin
ien
ab
weic
hu
ng
in
µm
Heli
x d
evia
tio
n i
n µ
mGood profile and helix form
Reproducibility of measurements
Profile slope deviation fH <= 1.1 µm
Helix slope deviation fHb <= 2.2 µm
O. Jusko et al CMM workshop CENAM 2010 ‹Nº›
Muchas gracias !