source analysis lacey pilgrim
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Source analysis lacey pilgrim](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082703/5579272dd8b42a9c578b4f17/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Source Analysis
June 8
2010Humanities 30-1Mr. Kabachia
Lacey Pilgrim
![Page 2: Source analysis lacey pilgrim](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082703/5579272dd8b42a9c578b4f17/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2 | P a g e S o u r c e A n a l y s i s L a c e y P i l g r i m
Source AnalysisIn the first source, the author has a view that is well-suited with Modern Liberalism and Keynesian
economics. In this source we are given the authors argument that individuals cannot be free to pursue
their happiness unless there is preventative actions that are taken by the government. He believes that
the government should have some involvement in the economy by creating social and economic
programs that prevent individuals from going into debt, poverty, and prevent them from going hungry.
With this argument, you can also depict that the author is referring to capitalism from when he says that
individuals cannot be free unless they accept and embrace the fact that there has to be some
government involvement in order for the individuals to be capable of pursuing their happiness. This
makes us believe that the author presumably believes in welfare capitalism, in which the government is
involved to create and provide a “safety net”. This “safety net” is provided to prevent these insecurities
that the author mentions such as debt or poverty. The author of this source also mentions welfare state,
a capitalist economy, where there is some government involvement to modify the market forces in
order to stabilize the economy through social programs. He is also referring welfare state to the idea of
the less frequent and less exaggerated “boom-and-bust” cycle developed by Richard Keynes called
Keynesian economics. His idea was that during good economic times the taxes are raised, and during
bad times, using that extra money to help the economy recover from the bust and soften the blow. This
source is a clear example of the opposition of classical liberalism and the promotion of modern
liberalism.
In the second source, the author is strongly criticizing socialism and left-wing ideologies. He makes his
argument by relating the socialist ideas as being impossible by assuming the production of goods is
occurring through “magic”. His conservative view is being projected through capitalist ideas that you
must need human labor in order to produce goods and this factor should not be changed, which is
![Page 3: Source analysis lacey pilgrim](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022082703/5579272dd8b42a9c578b4f17/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3 | P a g e S o u r c e A n a l y s i s L a c e y P i l g r i m
rejecting any government involvement. The author is promoting classical liberalism and rejecting
government involvement in an economy. The third source is also promoting classical liberalism and the
principle of self-interest. The illustrator of this source drew two wealthy men wearing suits, in an
extravagant home reading a recent news article about the poor also gaining in an economic boom. This
illustration depicts a capitalist idea because the article states that during an economic boom the poor
also benefit, which seems pointless to the wealthy men. The men are promoting capitalism and self-
interest because they do not see the good in an economic boom if the poor can also benefit from it.
These men are naïve to the principles of socialism and the ways of the “left” as well as modern
liberalism. This source promotes classical liberalism because it stays true to the values of capitalism and
also encourages the success of individuals, supporting value of self over value of others with no
government involvement.
The relationship between these sources addresses two main issues, government involvement as well as
the benefits of capitalism. These sources each address a different belief on the extent to which a
government should be involved in an economy. The first source rejects classical liberalism by saying that
there needs to be government intervention in order to enable individuals to truly pursue their
happiness. With this the author also believes that capitalism should be included in the economy with
occasional government intervention in order to run a more fair economy, which would be welfare
capitalism. The sources II and III are embracing classical liberalism by stating that government should
have no involvement in the economy, and by believing that capitalism and private companies should
only run the market. All three of these sources address self-interest. Source I is concerned about the
individuals pursuit of happiness and their self-interest in the economy, ensuring that there is some
government program to fall back on if necessary. Source II embraces self-interest and states that it can
prevent hunger and poverty around the world, if the people work hard. Source III also addresses self-
interest by promoting it as a necessary part of a capitalist economy.