south central 2013 14 [compatibility mode]
DESCRIPTION
ÂTRANSCRIPT
Legal Updatefor
South Central Unif. StaffKaren Haase
Harding & Shultz(402) 434-3000
H & S School Law
@KarenHaase
SpEd for Gen. Ed.
Child Find (referral)Compton Unif. Sch. Dist. v. Addison (9th Cir. 2010) • 9th grade student• “like a stick of furniture”• Colored with crayons, played with
dolls at her desk• Occasionally urinated on self • School respected parent’s desire that
child “not be pushed”
Child Find/ReferralAustin Indep. Sch. Dist. (Tex. 2010) • 3rd grader underachieving• Neurosurgeon called principal• School initiated RTI – told grandma no
verification until completed RTI• Reading consultant’s e-mail• Student verified; grandma sued• Ct. denied relief because student
responded well to interventions
Take Aways re Referral
Take Aways re Referral Don’t close your eyes to need for
verification If a parent asks for eval and you
don’t agree, provide procedural safeguards, etc. RTI does NOT trump IDEA Respond to parent requests for
evaluation immediately
ADA and Section 504• Rehabilitation Act doesn’t define “major life activity”• Courts have used ADA; congress amended to include- Concentrating- Reading- Learning
504/Health PlansTyler (Tx) Indep. Sch. Dist., (OCR 2010) • health care plan for diabetic students• Required to evaluate under 504Dracut (Ma) Pub. Sch., (OCR 2010)• health care plan for peanut allergy• Required to evaluate under 504
504/Health PlansOpelika city (AL) Sch. Dist., (OCR 2010) • health care plan for diabetic students• Required to evaluate under 504Jan. 19 Guidance Document
Health Plan Action Steps List of all kids with health plan List of all kids on medication and
what meds are List of all kids identified by parent
as having health condition Train school nurse!
10 Things NOT to Say in an IEP Meeting
All of our students must...
Refusal to Individualize Victoria Ind. Sch. Dist., (Tex. 2010)
• Student with fetal alcohol syndrome• Gen Ed Teacher E-mailed Parent• Parent privately placed
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 259 (Ks. 1999)• Student with dyslexia• Attended magnet school• Teacher told parent she had done every
thing she could for student
Refusal to Individualize Montgomery Co. Bd of Ed., (Ala 2005)
• Student suspended for fighting • Homebound services for 45 days:‾ 3 hours per week‾AlphaSmart 3000‾ Social skills training
Instead Say Things Like:
We believe this will be successful for your childWe have had success with this
approach with similar children This approach meets your child’s
individual needs
That will cost a ton. Our school just can’t afford it.
Cost doesn’t matter Santa Clara (CA) Unif. Sch. Dist,
(OCR 2009) • "back-to-basics" school - lottery• Only 3% sped (15% elsewhere)• No resource staff • OCR: discrimination against disabled
students
Cost doesn’t matterModoc County (CA) Office of Educ.
(OCR 1996)• Parents wanted adaptive PE• School could find cert. • Private consultant too expensive• Waiver for teacher provisionally cert• $40,000.00 per year vs. $1200.00
Instead Say Things Like:
We believe you child can make academic progress without ____We believe the program we’ve
designed for your child will meet your child’s individual need Can you provide us with more
information about this?
I have 19 other students in my classroom to worry about too.
MUST follow IEP IEP is staff’s “safe harbor” District liable for failure to follow:
• Due Process• OCR Complaint• Rule 51 Complaint
Personal Liability• Doe v. Withers,
(WV. 1993)• PPC claim
Instead Say Things Like: I will make sure to implement the
team’s modifications I am committed to Johnny’s
successWorking together we can find
strategies that will be successful
We don’t provide ABA for autistic
kids
Pre-determination
Deal v. Hamilton Co. Bd. Of Ed., (6th Cir. 2004) Lancaster Co. Sch. Dist. 001,
(Nebraska 2011)
Instead Say Things Like:
We use a multi-curricular approachWe don’t use exclusively one
curriculumWhat strategies would you like us
to consider
We only have to provide you a Ford,
not a Cadillac.
Just because it’s true doesn’t mean you say it
Instead Say Things Like:
We believe this will provide Sally with a great deal of education benefitWe are excited to see the progress
Sally will make with the plan
I don’t have time for this, I have to
get to practice
Take Time to Build Relationships
This is the most important IEP meeting in this person’s life Parents’ perception of team is
crucial
Instead Say Things Like:
Delighted that we can take time to visit about SallyHave each educator come
prepared to share an anecdote
That’s not appropriate, but if you want it, we’ll
put it in the IEP.
You say it, you pay it
Letter to Veir (OCR 1993) Must implement every aspect of
IEPMust be able to defend every
aspect of IEP
Instead Say Things Like:
I just cannot support that goal because I don’t think it is appropriate for Sally I understand your desire for ___,
but based on my training I truly believe that is not necessary/will be harmful
That has nothing to do with your child’s disability. We don’t need to address it in
the IEP.
Once a Child is Verified, Address Whole Child
The IEP Team must—In the case of a child whose behavior impedes the child’s learning or that of others, consider the use of positive behavioral interventions and supports, and other strategies, to address that behavior
§300.324(a)(2)(i)
Instead Say Things Like: Need to address Johnny’s
behavior so that we can be sure he’s getting the education he needs and deserves
We need to help Johnny understand that these behaviors are not appropriate
My caseload is full.
Carefully manage caseloads (away from parents)
In re: Student with a Disability (NY SEA 2002)• Student needed phys therapy esy• Teacher told parents school “would try”
In re: Student with a Disability (W. Va. SEA 2002)• Tech teacher RIF’d• Parents sued
IDEA ≠ I Do Enough Already
Instead Say Things Like:
We don’t know exactly who will be providing these services, but that person will be highly qualified
I hope I’m the one who gets to serve Sally, but we have several excellent speech paths.
This won’t take much time, we’ve already got the IEP drafted and all you have to do is sign.
Pre-determination W.A. v. Patterson Joint Univ. Sch.
Dist. (E.D. Cal. 2011)• “Predetermination can be a two
way street.” M.C.E. v. Board of Ed. of Fredrick
Co. (D. Md. 2011)• “open mind, not blank mind”
Mark M. v. Hawaii (Hawaii 2011)• School refused to consider data
Instead Say Things Like:
We have drafted this for your input Are there any changes you would
like us to makeMark document “draft” on every
pageKeep notes of edits
When Parents Walk out
Advise parents that you’ll continue the meeting without them
Indicate when parents left in notes
Finalize IEP (if ready to do so)
Technology Update
Agenda
Social Networking by teachers Social Networking by students
• Cyberbullying of Staff• Cyberbullying of Students
Social Networking Examples
• Facebook• YouTube• Twitter• Tumblr• Linkedin• Yelp
Teacher Use Causes for Concern
• Drug/Alcohol Use• Sexual Inappropriateness• Inappropriate Communication
with Students• Inappropriate Communication
about Students• Selling School Property
Nebraska Law NEB. REV. STAT. §§79-824, 79-827 Reasons for Termination and/or
Cancellation:• Unprofessional Conduct• Immorality• Other conduct which interferes
substantially with the continued performance of duties
My Suggestions Make a professional page separate
from your personal page Don’t “friend” students or parents
on your personal page Don’t let yourself be depicted
behaving unprofessionally Ask: will this affect my classroom?
Privacy Settings Set your profile as “private” Only let “friends” see pics Require notification before tagging Turn off geo-tags Friend Facebook on Facebook
Social Media and Politics
Social Media and Politics
Political Accountability and Disclosure Act
In the Matter of Michael Nolan, Case No. 07-03
Accessing at School
Computer, Server, Internet Connection all belong to the district.Use is permissiveAssume someone will read it
eventually.
Student Use of Social Media
Cyberbullying?Cyberbullying, v: the use of technology
such as computers and cell phones to engage in repeated, and hostile behavior
by an individual or group, that is intended to harm others.
The term "cyberbullying" is used when the victim or bully is a child or teen. The term cyber harassment is used when the
victim is an adult.
Cyberbullying of Staff
J.S. v. Blue Mountain Sch. Dist.Middle School Student made fake MySpace profile for principal
• Included photo from school website• Initially public; then limited• Students could only access off campus• Student suspended for 10 days; parents
sued
Layshock v. Hermitage Sch. DistHigh School Student made fake MySpace profile for principal
• Included photo from school website• Other students created similar and
more offensive profiles • Students only accessed off campus• Student suspended for 10 days; placed
in alt. sch, banned from extracurriculars, no commencement
J.S. and Layshock Inconsistent Third Circuit granted en banc
rehearing Oral Argument June 3, 2010 Decision issued June 13, 2011 The Bottom Line?
• Schools lost both cases
J.S. and Layshock Key legal points
• School can’t punish off-campus speech because it is vulgar, inappropriate or even criminal
• School can only punish off-campus speech that is substantially disruptive
What About the Staff?“We recognize that vulgar and offensive speech such as that employed in this case –even made in just – could damage the careers of teachers and administrators and we conclude only that the punitive action taken by the school district violated the First Amendment free speech rights of JS.”• i.e. “We don’t care”
Wisniewski v. Weedsport (2007)
Student sent IM to classmates• Gun icon with red dots above• Beneath icon was "Kill [name of• English teacher.]"
Student suspended for 1 semester Sued claiming violations of First
Amendment
Fulmer v. Swidler (Pa. 2003)
Middle school student created website:“Teacher Sux”• Compared math teacher to Hitler• Had picture of her decapitated • Asked for contributions toward hit
man Teacher sued Jury awarded $500,000 Similar suit by principal settled
Cyberbullying of Students
Not My Students!
• Tell teacher: 27% of preteens and only 9% of teens
• Tell friend: 44% of preteens and 72% of teens
• Told no one: 16% of preteens and teens
T.K. v. NY Dept’t of Ed., (2011)
LD student bullied by peers Ct.:
• No First Amendment protection for bullies
• “…merely requires schools do what the Department of Education has told them to do for years.”
Kowalski v. Berkeley Schs (2011)
Facebook page: Students Against Shae’s Herpes (SASH)
Student received• 10-day suspension from school • 90-day “social suspension”
Sued claiming violations of First Amendment
If you discover bullying
Cyber/bullying Responses Keep “Responding and Reporting”
separate in your mind (and your staff’s mind)
Focus on Small Stuff DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT,
DOCUMENT Look for nexus Don’t make promises you can’t keep
Helping Kids Deal; Tell them to:
Stop. Don’t respond to the bully.
Block. Block the cyberbully or limit all communications to those you can trust.
Tell. Tell a trusted adult.
Victim Need Interventions?
Interventions• Social skill training• Hygiene training with sped
teacher, counselor or other staff • Peer mentor Be ready for a 504 or SpEd
request
Legal Updatefor
South Central Unif. StaffKaren Haase
Harding & Shultz(402) 434-3000
H & S School Law
@KarenHaase