south dakota seow strategic prevention framework partnership for success (sd spf-pfs)

21
South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Upload: byron-oneal

Post on 30-Dec-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

South Dakota SEOWStrategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success

(SD SPF-PFS)

Page 2: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Selecting the Partnership for Success Priority

• South Dakota used an epidemiological approach to select the target priority for the PFS grant by comparing the state level indicators to the national average for underage alcohol use by persons aged 12 to 20 and prescription drug misuse and abuse among persons aged 12 to 25.

Page 3: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Alcohol use in the past month reported by persons aged 12 and older

12-17 yrs 18-25 yrs 12-20 yrs 26+ yrs0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

14.13%

67.82%

26.31%

60.79%

13.11%

60.45%

24.70%

55.33%South DakotaNational

*Rate Ratio:1.06

Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Abuse and Health, 2011-2012*Source: Table 5

*Rate Ratio:1.08

Note: A rate ratio value greater than 1 indicates the South Dakota rate is higher than the national rate

Page 4: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Binge drinking in the past month reported by persons 12 and over

12-17 yrs 18-25 yrs 12-20 yrs 26+ yrs0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

9.12%

52.06%

19.15%27.37%

7.31%

39.65%

15.55%21.83%

South DakotaNational*Rate Ratio:

1.23*Rate Ratio:1.25

Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Abuse and Health, 2011-2012*Source: Table 5

Note: A rate ratio value greater than 1 indicates the South Dakota rate is higher than the national rate

Page 5: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

A perception of great risk from binge drinking reported by persons 12 and older

12-17 yrs 18-25 yrs 26+ yrs0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

36.18%27.17%

37.83%40.21%34.50%

43.84% South DakotaNational

*Rate Ratio:0.90

Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Abuse and Health, 2011-2012*Source: Table 5

Note: A rate ratio value greater than 1 indicates the South Dakota rate is higher than the national rate

Page 6: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Nonmedical use of pain relievers in the past year reported by persons aged 12 or older

12-17 yrs 18-25 yrs 26+ yrs0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

4.29%

8.65%

2.78%

5.64%

9.96%

3.50%

South DakotaNational

*Rate Ratio:0.76

Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Abuse and Health, 2011-2012*Source: Table 5

Note: A rate ratio value greater than 1 indicates the South Dakota rate is higher than the national rate

Page 7: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Students who ever had at least one drink of alcohol on at least 1 day

9th Grade 12 Grade0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

54.3%

79.7%

61.7%

79.0%

South Dakota National

Source: Youth Online- High School Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 2011 and 2013 Results*Source: Table 6

Note: A rate ratio value greater than 1 indicates the South Dakota rate is higher than the national rate

*Rate Ratio:0.88

*Rate Ratio:1.01

9th Grade 12 Grade0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

53.5%

74.5%

55.6%

75.6%

South Dakota National

2011 2013

*Rate Ratio:0.96

*Rate Ratio:0.99

Page 8: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Students who used alcohol in the past 30 days

9th Grade 12 Grade0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

25.9%

57.0%

29.8%

48.4%

South Dakota National

Source: Youth Online- High School Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 2011 and 2013 Results*Source: Table 6

Note: A rate ratio value greater than 1 indicates the South Dakota rate is higher than the national rate

*Rate Ratio:1.18

*Rate Ratio:0.87

2011 2013

9th Grade 12 Grade0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

23.3%

43.7%

24.4%

46.8%

South Dakota National

*Rate Ratio:0.95

*Rate Ratio:0.93

Page 9: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Table 3. Students who had 5 or more drinks of alcohol in a row, that is, within a couple of hours, on one or more occasions of the past 30 days

9th Grade 12 Grade0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

14.4%

43.2%

14.0%

31.5%

South Dakota National

Source: Youth Online- High School Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 2011 and 2013 Results*Source: Table 6

Note: A rate ratio value greater than 1 indicates the South Dakota rate is higher than the national rate

*Rate Ratio:1.03

*Rate Ratio:1.37

2011 2013

9th Grade 12 Grade0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

10.5%

25.0%13.5%

29.2%

South Dakota National

*Rate Ratio:0.78

*Rate Ratio:0.86

Page 10: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Table 3. Prescription Drug Abuse

9th Grade 12 Grade0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

10.9%18.4%16.5%

25.6%

South Dakota National

Source: Youth Online- High School Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 2011 and 2013 Results*Source: Table 6

Note: A rate ratio value greater than 1 indicates the South Dakota rate is higher than the national rate

*Rate Ratio:0.72

*Rate Ratio:0.66

2011 2013

9th Grade 12 Grade0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

10.7%17.7%

12.4%

21.3%

South Dakota National

*Rate Ratio:0.86

*Rate Ratio:0.83

Page 11: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

• The regional analysis identified that underage drinking is an issue that is consistent across the state and throughout each region based on review of the NSDUH sub-state data.

Page 12: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Methodology for Selection of Subrecipient Communities

Page 13: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Sub-recipient Counties• Minnehaha County is the most heavily populated county in the

state and accounts for nearly 25% of the target population of 12 to 20 year olds. The county also has the largest number of youth treatment admissions and youth arrests for possession of alcohol.

• Pennington County is the 2nd most populated county in the state and accounts for nearly 13% of the target population of 12 to 20 year olds. Pennington County had the 2nd highest number of youth treatment admissions and 3rd highest number of youth arrests for alcohol. Pennington County is also home to a large number of Native American families and borders the Pine Ridge Reservation.

• Brown County is the 4th most populated county in the state of South Dakota and accounts for 4% of the targeted youth population. The county has the 4th highest number of youth treatment admissions as well as the 4th highest number of youth arrests for possession of alcohol.

Page 14: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Sub-recipient Counties• Meade County is the 7th most populated county in the state and contains nearly

2% of the state’s targeted youth population. Meade County has the 8th highest number of youth treatment admissions and the 12th highest number of youth arrests for possession of alcohol and boarders the Cheyenne River Reservation.

• Fall River County is the 25th most populated county in the state. The targeted population of 12-20 year olds in the county comprises nearly 1% of the total targeted population in the state. This county is ranked 20th for the number of youth treatment admissions and 20th for the number of youth arrested for possession of alcohol. Fall River County boarders the Pine Ridge Reservation.

• Roberts County includes a large proportion of the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate Reservation and is the 17th most populated county in the state, with 1.5% of the target population of 12-20 year olds. Roberts County has the 6th highest number of youth treatment admissions in the state, as well as the 14th highest number of youth arrested for possession of alcohol.

Page 15: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

• Yankton County is the 9th most populated county in the state and contains almost 2.5% of the targeted 12-20 year old population. The county has the 7th highest number of youth admitted to treatment and the 10th highest number of youth arrested for possession of alcohol.

• Codington County is the 6th most populated county in the state, containing 3.5% of the targeted 12-20 year old population. Codington County has the 9th highest number of youth treatment admissions, as well as the 8th highest number of youth arrested for possession of alcohol in the state.

• Beadle County is the 11th most populated county in the state and contains just over 2% of the targeted youth population. The county has the 14th highest number of youth treatment admissions and the 13th highest number of youth arrested for possession of alcohol in the state.

Sub-recipient Counties

Page 16: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

• Spink County is the 28th most populated county in the state. It contains almost 1% of the targeted 12-20 year old population. Spink is ranked 21st in the number of youth admissions for treatment in the state and 24th in the number of youth arrested for possession of alcohol in a rural high risk area.

• Todd County is the 19th most populated county in the state, containing just over 1.5% of the targeted youth population. Todd County has the 11th largest number of youth admissions for treatment and the 23rd largest number of youth arrested for possession of alcohol and contains a large proportion of the Rosebud Reservation in an extremely rural but high risk area.

• Perkins County is the 49th most populated county in the state and contains 0.3% of the targeted population of 12-20 year olds in the state and borders the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River Reservations in an extremely rural but high risk area.

Sub-recipient Counties

Page 17: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Disparate Populations-what this means for the funded PFS coalitions

Page 18: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

NOMs Discussion:what NOMs will need to be collected for the PFS

Page 19: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Indicator and Measure• Alcohol ConsumptionDuring the past 30 days, on how many days did you drink one or more drinks of an alcoholic beverage?

• Alcohol BingeDuring the past 30 days, on how many days did you have 4/5 or more drinks of alcohol in a row, that is, within a couple of hours?

• Alcohol Perception of HarmHow much do people risk harming themselves physically and in other ways when they have five or more drinks of an alcoholic beverage once or twice a week?

Outcome Reported

Percent who reported having used alcohol during the past 30 days (i.e., percent who responded 1 or more days)

Percent reporting moderate or great risk (i.e., percent reporting “moderate risk” and percent reporting “great risk” combined)

Percent reporting 4/5 or more drinks

Page 20: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

Indicator and Measure

• Alcohol and Drug Related ArrestsMeasure Calculation: The number of drug/alcohol-related arrests [for DUI, Drug Abuse Violations, and Liquor Law Violations (UCR-FBI defined)] divided by the number of total arrests and multiplied by 100

Page 21: South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)

SEOW Activities

• SEOW State and Regional Profiles• Data Briefs• Dashboard/Indicators/Compilation of State

Indicators