SOUTH EAST: THE IRISH DIMENSIONAn exploration of 2001 Census Data

A report prepared for the

This report, one of a suite of twenty four, is an outcome of a research project on the Irish data in the 2001 Census. The research project was funded by the Díon Committee.

Publication of this report is funded by the Díon Committee.

First published by the Federation of Irish Societies in 2007.

ISBN 978-1-906325-04-6

Copyright Source data - 2001 Census: Crown copyright. This report: FIS copyright.

Printed by New Image Design and Print, Block D, Unit 1, Bounds Green Industrial Estate, Ring Way, London N11 2UD.

The Federation of Irish Societies is a national umbrella body representing and providing services to its affiliated organisations throughout Britain. These organisations include welfare advice agencies, day centres, community care services, clubs, social and cultural organisations and housing providers; as well as projects to meet specific needs of particular sections of the community, such as women, elders, Irish travellers and prisoners.

South East: the Irish dimension

An exploration of 2001 Census data

A report prepared for the Federation of Irish Societies, London

Contents

Foreword ...................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................. 3 Using the data ............................................................................. 7 Key data ....................................................................................... 8 1. The nature of the population.............................................. 9 2. Economic activity and inactivity...................................... 14

3. Types of work .................................................................... 20

4. Unpaid carers .................................................................... 26

5. Qualifications .................................................................... 35

6. Home tenure and accommodation type .......................... 38

7. Amenities ........................................................................... 45

8. Health ................................................................................ 48

1

FIS foreword We are very pleased to be able to publish the suite of reports which FIS has commissioned from Word-Works and which focus on the Irish data in the 2001 Census. This data and commentaries are presented in a comparative context at national, regional and selected local levels, and on the basis of the full sixteen categories from the 2001 Census Ethnic Group Question. These reports indicate the diversity in the performance of ethnic minority groups in Britain. They show that the statistical profile of the identified white Irish places them closer to white British and Indian in many respects than, for example, more radically marginalised groups like Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, refugees and asylum seekers. Nevertheless, Irish deficits exist, most visibly in the area of health. They extend to related areas like levels of economic activity, where limiting long-term injury and disability contribute. The specific age profile of the white Irish population, with its bias towards older people, has implications in terms of care needs, as have the high proportions of white Irish single- and two-pensioner households. At the same time, the proportions of those white Irish without qualifications and working in the building industry point to the need for training/retraining towards integration/retention in the labour market. Indeed, government initiatives around health aspects of local regeneration, extension of working life, and reengagement of those with disabilities in the labour market, increase the importance of Irish community inclusion in order to achieve targets. It is important that the duality of the performance of the Irish in Britain – that combination of high achievement and disadvantage/social exclusion, which is by no means unique to the Irish community among British ethnic minority communities – should not distract attention from issues that need to be addressed. That there are sections of the Irish population who have multiple needs, are marginalised, and have information, support and service needs which need to be addressed was clearly indicated by the data provided by the FIS/AGIY Standardised Information System, collected from our front line agencies and published between 1994 and 2003. This and other documentation with a strong local thrust (for example, the valuable L Simpson et al, Ethnic minority populations and the Labour Market: an analysis of the 1991 and 2001 Censuses (DWP 2006)), emphasise the need for good local intelligence and greater and easier access to small-area statistics. We have been disappointed by the structuring of much of the analysis of ethnicity data from the 2001 Census published to date, particularly the use of various “combined ethnic group categories” and the failure to disaggregate the White “combined group” data. These procedures ignore one of the most significant findings of T Madood et al. Ethnic Minorities in Britain: Diversity and Disadvantage (PSI 1997) with relevance to policy formation, as well as such examples of good practice as Collecting ethnic category data: Guidance and training material for implementation of the new ethnic categories (DH 2001). Increasingly, micro-decisions about delivery of services take place at a local level. Those with local responsibility under the Race Relations Acts for addressing inequalities must have the best possible local data on all significant communities (including minority ethnic communities) at their disposal, and must use it in an inclusive way to inform their policies. We thank Word-Works for providing us with this suite of reports, which we commend to our affiliates, our partners in the British voluntary sector, and to those with a responsibility for policy formation and the delivery of services. We hope they will prove useful in raising the profile of the needs of ethnic minority populations, including our own.

Mary Tilki, Chair

Federation of Irish Societies May 2007

2

Author’s Introduction The Census has long been the most extensive, if not the most comprehensive, source of information about the population of England and Wales.

This has not been the case for the Irish population however. Although previously asked whether they were members of other minority ethnic groups, it was not until the 2001 Census that they were asked whether they were Irish. In the 1991 Census, the Irish population was identified from a combination of country of birth data and those instances where people had taken the initiative to write in their Irish identity.

The Census is based largely on a series of tick box type questions which are quick to fill in and easy to understand. This approach means that highly complex topics have to be condensed into just a few words.

Ethnic origin is one area which can suffer greatly from this treatment as it is so very complex. Potential problems arising in relation to Irish identity are discussed in the reports, most comprehensively in Section 1 of England: the Irish dimension.

It is important to examine the information derived from the Census to learn about the Irish population, in order to identify any specific provisions appropriate to meeting their needs. It is to assist this process that the Federation is publishing this series of commissioned reports on the Irish dimension of Census 2001.

The Census has provided us with an enormous quantity of data. These reports examine key elements of that data and make comparison, where appropriate, with data relating to the white British population and other minority ethnic populations.

Summary findings of the analysis of the Irish dimension of the 2001 Census are set out below and in the series of key data to be found at the beginning of each report.

1. The age of the white Irish population

The white Irish population of England and Wales, indicated by the 2001 Census data, is a comparatively older population. In England, the proportion of children identified – those aged under 16 – is very low: 6% in comparison with 20% when looking at the population of England as a whole. In London and the South East, the proportion of white Irish children is slightly higher (7% and 6% respectively), whereas it is slightly smaller in the South West and the North West (both slightly under 5%).

The issue of the proportion of children recorded is complicated by the fact that children born to Irish parents may not be classified in the Census as white Irish. If they have one Irish parent and one British parent, for example, they may be classified as white British or white other.

At the other end of the age scale, the white Irish population has a large proportion of people who are of pensionable age. Between 20% (London) and 32% (the West Midlands) are aged 65 or older.

With between a fifth and a third of the population of this age, there are consequences for the population in terms of economic activity, health and welfare. For example, when looking at the white Irish population as a whole, the level of economic activity is low – this is due at least in part to the proportion of people who are retired.

The white Irish population also exhibits the highest level of people who describe themselves as being in ‘not good health’ of all the ethnic groups listed. When data is broken down by age, it can be seen that this is largely (although not solely) because the population has such a high proportion of older people, who are far more likely to describe themselves as being in ‘not good health’.

3

One of the consequences of an older population is a higher proportion of women – simply due to the greater longevity of women. In London for example, 58% of the white Irish population is female. In the South East 62% of the white Irish 65 and older population is female. In England as a whole, 53% of the white Irish population (of all ages) is female.

Another related consequence of an older population is the proportion of people who are living alone – typically women who have outlived their male spouses. A fifth of white Irish households comprise a pensioner living alone.

Given the older age profile of the white Irish population identified in the Census, as well as the proportion of white Irish households which are single or two pensioner households, provision of statutory and unpaid/informal care is a significant issue. The Census indicated that, in England, 4% of pensionable age white Irish men were themselves providing 50 or more hours a week of unpaid care, that 1.7% of working age white Irish men were providing the same amount of weekly care, and that 8.6% of working age white Irish women were providing 1 to 19 hours a week of unpaid care.

In addition to the informal and formal care being provided in the community, 0.44% of the white Irish population are being cared for in psychiatric hospitals and homes, nursing homes and residential homes, as opposed to 0.28% of the whole population.

2. Education and qualifications

The findings of the 2001 Census in this area present a mixed picture. At one level, the white Irish population performs very well, in terms of the proportion attaining the highest qualifications (levels 4/5 – degrees, PhDs, professional qualifications).

Among white Irish aged 25 to 34, the proportion so qualified reached 46% - with regional variations ranging from 36% (West Midlands) to 54% (North East England), proportions, in each case, more than double that found in the equivalent white British population. Even 22% of 16 to 24 year old white Irish people in England have qualifications at this level, although some of the qualifications would be outside their age range.

This pattern of relatively high attainment continues up to the age group 35 to 49. After this age, the attainment levels reduce to the levels of the white British population.

One of the main reasons for the comparatively low levels of economic activity amongst white Irish 16 to 24 year olds, is the large proportion of white Irish individuals who are in full-time education. The proportion here is much greater than in the equivalent white British population, rising to 69% in the North East of England. Levels of economic activity in this group range between 4% and 10% below the level of economic activity in the white British population.

The Census data suggests that, while a proportion of white Irish people in England have high level qualifications, there is also a significant proportion who have no qualifications at all. 12% of white Irish 16 to 24 year olds have no qualifications (from 9% in the North East to 17% in the West Midlands). This proportion rises with age. Amongst white Irish 65 to 74 year olds 70% in England have no qualifications. This ranges from 60% in the South East to 77% in the West Midlands.

In each group over the age of 49, there is a greater proportion of white Irish people with no qualifications at all than in the population as a whole. For example 62% of white Irish people in England aged between 60 and 64 have no qualifications, in comparison with 54% of the general population.

4

3. Work

The 1991 and 2001 Censuses provide evidence that Irish men are commonly to be found working ‘on the buildings’. The 2001 Census found that this was true for around a fifth of white Irish men of working age. Between 13% in North East England and 22% in the West Midlands are working in construction – 20% in England as a whole. These are far higher proportions than those found in any other ethnic population. Working in construction has possible implications for other areas of life. It can have a seasonal or temporary element leaving numbers of men out of work for periods of time. It can also be dangerous and exhausting work. It is an industry which reflects the peaks and troughs of the economy. With so many white Irish people working ‘on the buildings’, there is inevitably a glut of people needing to retrain at times when there is an economic downturn or when individuals need to move on for other reasons such as age and illness.

Between a quarter and a third of white Irish women are working in health and social services. This is a far greater proportion than in the white British population and on a par with the Black African and Black Caribbean populations. Much care work and nursing work, while not seasonal or temporary, can be low-paid or may involve anti-social hours.

A significant proportion of white Irish men work in professional occupations. 15% of white Irish men in England are in professional occupations (compared to 12% of white British men). In some English regions, the picture is much more exaggerated. For example, in the North East, 27% of white Irish men are in professional occupations in comparison with 10% of white British men. Women show a similar, although less pronounced, pattern. 13% of white Irish women in England are in professional occupations in comparison with 11% of white British women.

So again, in this area, the 2001 Census presents a mixed picture. Further, the Census data relates to a period of time in which there was relative economic prosperity for the country and its regions. Certain indicators, such as levels of long-term unemployment were thus very low. It is important to recognise that during a less prosperous time, such indicators will be higher and there may be greater disparities between some of the ethnic groups.

4. Health

The Census provides data about limiting long-term illness and disability. In every region in England the proportion of white Irish men aged between 25 and 74 who are not working because of permanent illness or disability is higher than the proportion of white British men not working for the same reason. In England, 11% of white Irish men are not working because of illness or disability. There is one age group of white Irish men for whom findings in this area are exceptionally strong and consistent, men aged between 50 and 64. In this age group, between 25% (the South East) and 41% (the North West) of men have limiting long-term illness. In England as a whole, 29% of white Irish men of this age have limiting long-term illness, 4% more than amongst white British men of the same age.

The Census also asked about people’s view of whether they were in good health or not. 22% of men in England aged between 50 and 64 described their health as ‘not good’. In fact, for each age group, for both men and women, the trend is for more white Irish people than white British people to indicate ‘not good health’.

5. Housing and amenities

Census data relating to housing and amenities provides a complex picture in terms of the white Irish population. For example, a relatively high proportion of the population owns their own home outright (26%) but, similarly, a relatively high proportion of the white Irish population lives in social housing (21%). These proportions are relatively

5

high in comparison with both other minority ethnic populations listed in the Census and in comparison with the majority of the white British population.

Significantly, in England, the white Irish population has the highest proportion (1.2%) of people in medical and care communal establishments (including psychiatric units, prison, and those we might associate with an older population, residential and nursing homes). The population also has the highest proportion of people in households comprising a lone pensioner (18%). This is true of England as a whole and each of the country’s regions.

In terms of amenities, the white Irish population of England shows two interesting characteristics in comparison with the other ethnic populations listed in the Census. The first is in terms of central heating – 8% of the white Irish population has no central heating – and secondly, 40% of the white Irish population does not have a car. Both of these proportions are higher than those found in the white British population.

The report

The Census data is wholly descriptive and, as such, does not seek to explain particular phenomena, merely to tell us what it is. Thus, we cannot find out from Census data why a specific proportion of people live in social housing, for example. The following report attempts to describe the findings of the 2001 Census and, where appropriate, to suggest possible causes and effects.

Gudrun Limbrick Word-Works

May 2007

6

Using the data

All the data in this report is derived from the results of the 2001 Census which attempted to include all people living in England and Wales. As such, the report and its findings are entirely dependent on the coverage achieved by the Census, the terminology used and the questions asked.

The delineations used are those provided by the Census. For example, the age bands quoted are those designed by the Census. The data is represented as graphs in this report to provide an immediate visual to represent the bare figures. However, greater detail can be found in the accompanying tables of data. This report has a number of companion volumes which may provide useful comparative analysis to aid understanding.

National reports: Local reports: England Birmingham

Wales Bristol

Coventry

Regional reports: Leeds

East England Leicester

East Midlands Liverpool

London Luton

North East England Manchester

North West England Northampton

South East England Nottingham

South West England Portsmouth

West Midlands Sheffield

Yorkshire and the Humber Swindon

Data Source: 2001 Census, [Key Statistics for Local Authorities]. Crown copyright 2004. Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO.

7

The South East: Key data

The nature of the population - 67% of the white Irish population was born in the Republic of Ireland - 25% of the white Irish population is aged 65 or older Economic activity and inactivity - 65% of white Irish people aged 25 to 74 are economically active - 7% of white Irish men are not working because of permanent sickness or disability - 49% of white Irish 16 to 24 year olds are in full-time education Types of work - 17% of white Irish men are working in construction - 24% of white Irish men are managers or senior officials - 11% of white Irish men are in elementary-type occupations - 27% of white Irish women are working in health and social work Qualifications - 10% of white Irish 16 to 24 year olds have no qualifications - 21% of white Irish 16 to 24 year olds have qualifications at the highest levels Home tenure and accommodation type - 70% of white Irish people own their own home - 13% of white Irish people are in social housing - 11% of white Irish people are in privately rented accommodation - 17% of white Irish households are pensioners living alone Amenities - 27% of white Irish people do not own a car - 5% of the white Irish population does not have central heating - 8% of the white Irish population are living in households regarded as overcrowded Health - 9% of white Irish men aged 16 to 49 have long-term limiting illness - 20% of white Irish men aged 16 to 64 are in not good health - 18% of white Irish women aged 16 to 64 are in not good health

8

Section 1. The nature of the population of the South East _____________________________________________________________________ This section looks at the number of Irish people in the South East in comparison with other ethnic groups. The place of birth of Irish people is examined, differentiating between those Irish people born in Ireland and those born elsewhere. It also examines basic demographic information such as ethnic origin, gender and age. It is this data which is of fundamental importance when understanding other data in this report such as economic activity and health. In the South East region, 91.3% of the population classified themselves as white British1 in the 2001 Census. In comparison, 87.0% of the population of England as a whole classify themselves as white British. London is not included as part of the South East region for the purposes of this report but is treated as a separate region in a separate report. It is interesting to note here, however, that in London, 59.8% of the population classify as white British, highlighting the difference between the capital city and the region around it. The make-up of the remainder of the population is illustrated in the figure below. Figure 1. The proportion of the population in minority ethnic groups in the South East

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

1.0% of the population of the South East defined themselves as white Irish in the 2001 Census – a proportion 0.3% lower than the proportion of the population of England as a whole (1.3%). In the South East, the largest minority ethnic population is ‘white other’ – 2.8% of the population. It is probable that the proportion of Irish people recorded in the Census is an under-representation of the actual Irish community in the South East and this issue is discussed more fully in England: the Irish dimension – an exploration of 2001 Census data. Estimates2 suggest that the actual Irish population of the South East could be between 3.2% (254,805 individuals) and 3.8% (305,766 individuals) which is lower than the estimated proportional size of the Irish population of England (4.1%). These

1 In the Census questionnaire, respondents were given five options: white, mixed, Asian, Black or Chinese. Within the ‘white’ option, respondents were asked to select either British, Irish or other white. For the purposes of this report, these options have been abbreviated to ‘white British’, ‘white Irish’ and ‘white other’. 2 Using the 2.5 and 3 correctional factors of the born-in-Ireland population suggested by Hickman MJ and Walter B Discrimination and the Irish Community in Britain CRE 1997.

9

corrected figures would make the Irish population the largest minority ethnic population in the region. Figure 2. Proportion of population of the South East born on the island of Ireland3

0.0%0.1%0.2%0.3%0.4%0.5%0.6%0.7%0.8%0.9%1.0%

South East England

Born in Northern Ireland

Born in the Republic ofIreland

0.8% of the population of the South East was born in the Republic of Ireland – in comparison with 0.9% of the population of England. Of those people who described themselves in the Census as white Irish, 66.7% were born in the Republic of Ireland and 9.0% were born in Northern Ireland. In total, 30.5% of those who described themselves as white Irish were born in the United Kingdom. Figure 3. Proportion of the population that is female

42%

44%

46%

48%

50%

52%

54%

56%

58%

Female

s : to

tal

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

51.2% of the population of the South East is female. In the white Irish population, this increases to 54.2%. Only one minority ethnic group has a higher proportion of women than is found in the white Irish population – the ‘other white’ population of which is 55.6% women. 51.2% of the white British population is female. The Bangladeshi has the smallest proportion of women – 47.2%.

3 The term island of Ireland used here includes both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

10

Figure 4. The age distribution of the white Irish population in the South East

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

0-15 16-24 25-49 50-59 60-64 65-74 75 +

white Irishall

The above chart clearly shows a disparity between the population of the South East region as a whole (labelled ‘all’) and the white Irish element of it. In particular, with only 5.7% aged under 16, the white Irish population is an older population relative to the rest of the region. 25.0% (a quarter) of the region’s white Irish population is aged over 64, in comparison with 16.4% of the population as a whole. Age is arguably one of the most important factors to bear in mind when looking at characteristics of the white Irish population as defined by the 2001 Census. One factor to bear in mind is whether people in different age groups behaved differently in terms of completing and retuning the Census forms. Hickman and Walter (1997)4 suggest that there is likely to be an under-representation of younger Irish people completing the Census and there is also an issue of second and third generation Irish people who did not define as Irish5 in the Census. This would have an impact on the proportion of younger white Irish people counted in the Census. However, the issue of under-enumeration would not apply to those aged under 166 who are very poorly represented in the age distribution illustrated above. From the data the Census provides, it is not possible to say to what extent the skewed age profile above is the result of the under-count and to what extent there actually is a skewed age profile in the white Irish population.

4 Hickman MJ and Walter B Discrimination and the Irish Community in Britain CRE 1997. 5 This is discussed in England: the Irish Dimension - an exploration of 2001 Census data. 6 A significant feature of the age distribution of white Irish people is the small proportion who are aged 0 to 15 – far smaller than in any other of the region’s white British or minority ethnic populations. One can assume that, in most cases, parents or guardians will have completed Census forms on behalf of children of this age. It is thus the parents, in the main, who are making decisions about their children’s declared ethnicity. Most of the parents of the children of this age, will themselves be in the 24 to 49 age group in figure 4 – an age group of similar proportion in the white Irish population to the population of the region as a whole. This begs the question of why parents who, reporting themselves to be white Irish, did not record their children as white Irish.

11

Figure 5. Proportion of the population aged 75 and older

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

75 an

d olde

r: tota

l

Whit

e - B

ritish

White -

Irish

White -

Othe

r Whit

e

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

In England: the Irish dimension – an exploration of 2001 Census data there is discussion of the proportion of the population that is aged 65 or older. In the white Irish population, there is a significantly higher proportion of white Irish people aged older than 65 (24.9%) than in the rest of the country’s population (15.9%). On a regional level, the proportion of the white Irish population aged 65 or older (25.0%) is similar to the national picture as is the proportion of the region’s population as a whole in that age bracket (16.4%). This is illustrated in figure 4. On a regional level, we are able to examine the older proportion of this age group – those aged 75 and older and this is illustrated in the figure above. The comparatively large proportion of the white Irish population aged 75 or over is clear in the chart above. In this region, 10.8% of the white Irish population is aged 75 or older. For the white British population, the proportion is 8.4%, whereas – at the other extreme - it is less than 0.9% in the Bangladeshi and white and Black Caribbean populations. Figure 6. Age distribution of selected minority ethnic groups

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0 - 15 16 - 24 25 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 74 75 andolder

white Irishwhite BritishIndianPakistaniBlack CaribbeanChinese

12

There is no other (majority or minority) ethnic group in the South East which is structured in the same way as the white Irish population in terms of the age of its members. A relatively low proportion of under-25s (11.8%) is contrasted with a relatively high proportion in each age group over 50. In the white British population, 30.0% of the population are aged under 25, as is 63.8% of the Black Caribbean population and 82.4% of the Pakistani population. 54.7% of the white Irish population is in the potentially economically active 25 to 59 age group, but this is not as significantly different from other ethnic groups as in the lower and higher age groups. For example, 60.5% of the Black Caribbean population is aged between 25 and 59, as is 48.0% of the White British population. Just 40.8% of the Pakistani population is aged between 25 and 59. As the above series of graphs illustrates, in comparison with the other minority ethnic groups listed, the white Irish population is an ageing population – a larger proportion of the population is older (over 64) than is younger (under 25). A population of this structure will shrink as the numbers who die are not matched by those born, unless migration patterns change the general trend or unless there are changes in how sections of the population perceive their ethnicity7. Additionally, an aging population will have very different characteristics and needs in comparison to those with a younger population – more people will be retired and no longer economically active; care needs may be different and levels of ill-health and disability tend to be higher in populations which are older, for example. As suggested above (in discussion of figure 4), it is important to remember that a skewed age profile may be affected by different age groups having differing Census form return rates. This may or may not affect different ethnic groups in different ways. _____________________________________________________________________ In summary This section found that 1.0% of the region’s population reported as white Irish. However this is likely to be an under-representation of actual figures. Self-declared ethnicity is a complicated issue – the white Irish population could be as high as 3.8% of the population of the South East. The reported white Irish population in the South East has a relatively small number of people who are aged under 25 and a relatively large number of people who are aged 50 and older, and 75 and older.

7 Commentators have suggested that for a variety of reasons (such as the complexities of ethnicity and identity, a confusion between ethnicity and nationality, and the construction of the ethnic group question in the Census form), a number of people born on the island of Ireland and second and third generation Irish people may not have taken the option of identifying as white Irish in the 2001 Census.

13

Section 2. Economic activity and inactivity _____________________________________________________________________ Any population has a bearing on the economy of the place in which it lives. This section examines the levels of economic activity of the white Irish population of the South East in comparison with the rest of the region’s population. Economic activity, as an indicator, is a count of the number of individuals who are either working or are available to work. To aid our understanding, this section also looks at what the Census has to say about economic inactivity. The first figures in this section look at those people aged between 16 and 24. The later figures look at the older age group – those aged between 25 and 74. Figure 7. Proportion of the population of the South East aged 16 to 24 years old which is economically active8

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Econo

mically

activ

e 16-2

4 yea

r olds

: total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

In the South East region, 60.5% of the white Irish population aged 16 to 24 is economically active. This compares with 71.2% of the region’s white British population. Despite economic activity being 10.7% lower than in amongst white British people, economic activity in the white Irish population is higher than in most of the other minority ethnic populations listed. The economic activity of 16 to 24 year old white Irish people places them fourth highest among all the populations listed. Apart from the white British population, higher proportions are found in the white and Black Caribbean population (65.5%) and the Black Caribbean population (61.3%).

8 Economically active is defined as the state of being available for work or working. Thus, someone who is unemployed is still defined as economically active. Someone who is retired, for example, is not defined as economically active.

14

Figure 8. Proportion of 25-74 year olds who are economically active

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

As with the 16 to 24 age group examined above, the white Irish population has a lower proportion of economic activity in the 25 to 74 age group than the white British population. 64.7% of the white Irish population in this age group are economically active in comparison with 70.3% of the white British population. In fact, only the Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations (55.2% and 55.4% respectively) have lower levels. When looking at this data, it is important to remember the relative age of the white Irish population – 14.2% of the white Irish population are aged 60 to 74 and may thus be retired and no longer economically active. This compares, for example, with 8.7% of the white British population. Figure 9. Economic activity and inactivity amongst 16 to 24 year old men

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%

Part-tim

e emplo

yee

Full-tim

e emplo

yee

Self-em

ploye

d

Unemplo

yed

Full-tim

e stud

ent

Retired

Look

ing af

ter ho

me/fam

ily

Perman

ently

sick

/disa

bled

white Irishwhite British

71.2% of white British 16 to 24 year olds in the South East were found to be economically active, in comparison with 60.5% of the white Irish population (see figure 7). The chart above suggests that much of this difference comes from the proportion of students – 47.6% of young white Irish men are full-time students in comparison with 37.3% of white British men.

15

A number of factors can influence the size of a student population. These include: - the achievement of appropriate qualifications earlier in life (see section 5: Qualifications) - a community ethos which values and encourages education - migration specifically to attend further or higher education establishments (the Census data does not indicate what proportion of full-time students have come to England specifically for their education and, importantly, what proportion are planning to return to their home country once that education is complete). The large proportion of people who are students may account for the fact that 36.9% of white Irish men in this age group are in full-time employment in comparison with 47.5% of white British men. Levels of unemployment are more similar – 4.6% of white Irish men are unemployed in comparison with 5.0% of white British men. Figure 10. Economic activity and inactivity amongst 16 to 24 year old women

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Part-tim

e emplo

yee

Full-tim

e emplo

yee

Self-em

ploye

d

Unemplo

yed

Full-tim

e stud

ent

Retired

Look

ing af

ter ho

me/fam

ily

Perman

ently

sick

/disa

bled

white Irishwhite British

When looking at young women, the proportion of white Irish students is again higher – 50.2% of white Irish women in comparison with 40.0% of white British women. A smaller proportion of white Irish women than white British women are in both full-time employment and part-time employment. 33.5% of white Irish women of this age group are in full-time employment as are 38.9% of white British women. For part-time employment, the proportion of white Irish women is 4.7% and it is 7.7% amongst white British women. Figure 11. Economic activity and inactivity amongst 25 to 74 year old men

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Part-tim

e emplo

yee

Full-tim

e emplo

yee

Self-em

ploye

d

Unemplo

yed

Full-tim

e stud

ent

Retired

Look

ing af

ter ho

me/fam

ily

Perman

ently

sick

/disa

bled

white Irishwhite British

16

Despite 14.2% of white Irish people being aged 65 to 74 in comparison with 8.7% of white British people, the difference in terms of retirement between the two populations of men, as shown above, is not as marked – 16.2% and 14.0% respectively. However, there remains a 7% difference in terms of full-time employment. 50.1% of white Irish men are in full-time employment as are 57.0% of white British men. 6.8% of the white Irish men are not working because of being permanently sick or disabled in comparison with 4.3% of the white British population. Figure 12. Economic activity and inactivity amongst 25 to 74 year old women

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%

Part-tim

e emplo

yee

Full-tim

e emplo

yee

Self-em

ploye

d

Unemplo

yed

Full-tim

e stud

ent

Retired

Look

ing af

ter ho

me/fam

ily

Perman

ently

sick

/disa

bled

white Irishwhite British

Taking women aged between 25 and 74, it is the proportion of those who are retired which presents the most marked difference between the white Irish and white British populations. 22.7% of white Irish women are retired in comparison with just 18.5% of white British women. Additionally, there is again a higher proportion of people permanently sick or disabled amongst white Irish women (4.3%) than amongst white British women (3.6%). In the white Irish population, there is a smaller proportion of women not working because they are looking after their home or family full-time (11.2%) than in the white British population (12.9%).

17

Figure 13. Proportion of men who are long-term unemployed – including those who have never worked

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Total

Whit

e - Briti

sh

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

Long-term unemployment amongst men, including those who have never worked, is lower (on average 1.2% lower) in the South East than it is in England as a whole. 2.1% of white Irish men (of working age) are long-term unemployed – this rises to 6.4% in the Black African population – the highest proportion of all the populations listed. Amongst white British men, 1.6% are long-term unemployed. Only two other populations – Indian men and Chinese men – have levels of long-term unemployment lower than that found amongst white Irish men. Figure 14. Proportion of women who are long-term unemployed - including those who have never worked

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

3.2% of white Irish women in the South East are long-term unemployed – a proportion only 0.3% higher than amongst white British women – 2.9%. Levels of female long-term unemployment in the region (including those who have never worked) are lower than in England as a whole amongst both white British women and white Irish women – and in all the populations listed apart from Bangladeshi women. The latter have the highest level of long-term unemployment in both England and in

18

the South East (50.9%). Apart from white British women, only one other population has a lower level of long-term unemployment than white Irish women – white and Black Caribbean women (3.0%). _____________________________________________________________________ In summary This section looked at economic activity and found a relatively low level of economic activity amongst the largest age group – 25 to 74 year olds. In the same age group, there were relatively high levels of white Irish people who were retired and people who were not working because of permanent sickness or disability. In the 16 to 24 age group, the most notable feature is the relatively high proportion of white Irish people who were in full-time education. In terms of unemployment (including those who have never worked), figures for the white Irish population are higher than those for the white British population.

19

Section 3. Types of work _____________________________________________________________________ Having examined overall levels of economic activity in the previous section, this section concentrates on what the Census reveals about the nature of work undertaken by the population. Do different ethnic minority groups tend to do different types of work? Figure 15. The proportion of men who are managers or senior officials

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Manag

ers an

d Sen

ior O

fficial

s: tot

al

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

White -

Othe

r Whit

e

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

With the exception of ’other white’ men (26.4% of whom are managers or senior officials), the proportion of white Irish men who are employed in the highest managerial roles (24.3%) is higher than in any other ethnic populations listed. Nearly a quarter of white Irish men of working age are working as managers or senior officials. The population with the smallest proportion of men working as manager or senior officials is the Black African population in which 12.6% are involved. Figure 16. The proportion of women working as managers or senior officials

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

Manag

ers an

d Sen

ior O

fficial

s: tot

al

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

The proportion of women working as managers or senior officials is lower than that of men across the board – 12.3% of women are working at this level, in comparison

20

with 21.7% of men. 14.0% of white Irish women are managers or senior officials – this is the highest proportion after Chinese women (14.6%). As with men, the Black African population provides the lowest proportion (6.7%). Figure 17. Occupations amongst men aged 16 to 74

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Manag

ers an

d sen

ior of

ficial

s

Profes

siona

l occ

upati

ons

Assoc

iate p

rof &

tech

occu

patio

ns

Admin

& secre

tarial

occu

patio

ns

Skilled

trade

s occ

upati

ons

Person

al se

rvice

occu

patio

ns

Sales &

custo

mer se

rvice

occu

patio

ns

Proces

s, pla

nt & m

achin

e ope

rative

s

Elemen

tary o

ccup

ation

s

white Irishwhite Britishall

The most significant differences between white Irish men and white British men are in the managers and senior officials category discussed above, in professional occupations (employing 16.3% of white Irish men and 13.0% of white British men) and in skilled trades (15.0% and 18.7% respectively). The most common occupations for white Irish men in the South East region are the managerial and senior positions (24.3%), professional occupations (16.3%) and skilled trades (15.0%). Figure 18. Occupations amongst women aged 16 to 74

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Manag

ers an

d sen

ior of

ficial

s

Profes

siona

l occ

upati

ons

Assoc

iate p

rof &

tech

occu

patio

ns

Admin

& secre

tarial

occu

patio

ns

Skilled

trade

s occ

upati

ons

Person

al se

rvice

occu

patio

ns

Sales &

custo

mer se

rvice

occu

patio

ns

Proces

s, pla

nt & m

achin

e ope

rative

s

Elemen

tary o

ccup

ation

s

white Irishwhite Britishall

The most marked differences between white Irish women and white British women are the proportions in the three categories of professional occupations, associate professional and technical occupations and administrative and secretarial occupations. Professional occupations employ 14.0% of white Irish women and 9.9% of white British women. The associate professional occupations employ 20.9%

21

of white Irish women and 14.4% of white British women. In the administrative and secretarial occupations, the picture is reversed. 18.8% of white Irish women and 24.4% of white British women are employed in this field. The following figures look at employment in terms of what has become known as NS-SEC. NS-SEC (National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification) is an attempt to look at social classification by occupation but, instead of being solely an examination of jobs, the NS-SEC is constructed using three pieces of information: occupation, employment status and the size of the establishment in which the person works. To this end, the 2001 Census form asked for a significant amount of information about each respondent’s job, place of work, role and level9. The picture created by the following figure will thus differ in some respects from the previous figures which were looking solely at occupation. Figure 19. Men in the South East aged between 16 and 74 – by NS-SEC (excluding those who are unemployed or in full-time education)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Higher

manag

erial

& profe

ssion

al oc

cupa

tions

Lower

manag

erial

& profe

ssion

al oc

cupa

tions

Interm

ediat

e occ

upati

ons

Small em

ploye

rs an

d own a

ccou

nt work

ers

Lower

supe

rviso

ry an

d tec

hnica

l occ

upati

ons

Semi-ro

utine

occu

patio

ns

Routin

e occ

upati

ons

white Irishwhite Britishall

When looking at occupations in the South East in terms of the NS-Sec analysis, white Irish men are proportionately under-represented in the lower managerial and intermediate occupations when compared with the white British men but, in higher managerial occupations, there are proportionately more white Irish men involved than white British men. 17.5% of white Irish men are in higher managerial occupations in comparison with 15.6% of white British men. Conversely, 20.3% of white Irish men are in lower managerial occupations in comparison with 21.6% of white British men. The intermediate occupations employ 4.0% and 5.5% respectively. Semi-routine occupations include 5.5% of white Irish men and 6.9% of white British men.

9 A full description of the NS-SEC definitions is to be found in England: the Irish dimension – an exploration of 2001 Census data.

22

Figure 20. Women in the South East aged between 16 and 74 – by NS-SEC (excluding those who are unemployed or in full-time education)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Higher

manag

erial

& profe

ssion

al oc

cupa

tions

Lower

manag

erial

& profe

ssion

al oc

cupa

tions

Interm

ediat

e occ

upati

ons

Small em

ploye

rs an

d own a

ccou

nt work

ers

Lower

supe

rviso

ry an

d tec

hnica

l occ

upati

ons

Semi-ro

utine

occu

patio

ns

Routin

e occ

upati

ons

white Irishwhite Britishall

5.6% of white Irish women are in higher managerial occupations along with 3.9% of white British women. Lower managerial occupations employ 21.7% of white Irish women and 18.2% of white British women. In terms of semi-routine occupations, this includes 11.7% of white Irish women and 16.7% of white British women. Figure 21. Industry areas of the male working population

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Agricu

lture,

mini

ng an

d fish

ing

Manufa

cturin

g (inc

luding

utilit

ies)

Constr

uctio

n

Who

lesale

and r

etail t

rade

Hotels

and r

estau

rants

Transp

ort an

d com

munica

tion

Financ

ial an

d prof

essio

nal s

ervice

s

Public

secto

r serv

ices (

includ

ing ed

ucati

on)

Health

and s

ocial

servi

ces

white Irishwhite British

17.1% of white Irish men work in construction. None of the other populations listed in the Census have such a high proportion of men working in construction. The next highest proportion is amongst white British men – 12.1%.

23

In terms of both white Irish men and white British men, the field employing the greatest proportion is that financial and professional services – employing 19.4% and 19.9% respectively. Outside construction, other industry areas have marked differences between white Irish and white British men. 10.7% of white Irish men work in wholesale or retail, in comparison with 15.9% of white British men. 6.0% of white Irish men work in health and social services along with 3.1% of white British men. 13.6% of white Irish men in the South East work in manufacturing in comparison with 17.0% of white British men. There are consequences to working in the construction industry as a Mind report of 200310 has found: “A major disadvantage of a lifetime of work in the construction industry is that many Irish men are in poor physical health and unable to work. They have not paid insurance contributions and end up without pensions in their old age or when ill.” In the light of this, it is interesting to return to figure 11 which illustrates that 6.8% of men aged between 25 and 74 are not working because of permanent sickness or disability. This is a high proportion of men, particularly when looked at in comparison with the male white British population in which 4.3% are not working because of permanent sickness or disability. We will return to this topic in Section 8: Health. Figure 22. Industry areas of the female working population

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Agricu

lture,

mini

ng an

d fish

ing

Manufa

cturin

g (inc

luding

utilit

ies)

Constr

uctio

n

Who

lesale

and r

etail t

rade

Hotels

and r

estau

rants

Transp

ort an

d com

munica

tion

Financ

ial an

d prof

essio

nal s

ervice

s

Public

secto

r serv

ices (

includ

ing ed

ucati

on)

Health

and s

ocial

servi

ces

white Irishwhite British

The sector employing the largest proportion of white Irish women in the South East is health and social services – accounting for 26.6%, more than a quarter, of white Irish women. Only two populations of women, of the ethnic populations listed in the Census, have a higher proportion employed in this field – Black Caribbean (26.9% and Black African 37.0%. The field employs 17.4% of white British women.

10 Mind: Mental health of Irish-born people in Britain, 2003.

24

After health and social services, the field employing the next highest proportion of white Irish women is financial and professional services, employing 19.4% of white Irish women and 19.9% of white British women. Health and social work (also referred to as health and social care within the Census outputs) will include medicine, nursing, auxiliary nursing, care work, social work etc. Some of these jobs will be highly qualified and well paid roles such as doctors, others will require no qualifications and may well be low paid. _____________________________________________________________________ In summary This section suggests that there is an Irish population which presents two pictures. The first presents a picture of a population which has a relatively high proportion in managerial positions and professional positions. The second presents a picture of a population in which a very high proportion of men are working in construction and a very high proportion of women are working in health and social care. These types of work can have significant effects on a population’s health, well-being and (current and future) financial well-being.

25

Section 4. Unpaid carers _____________________________________________________________________ Previous sections have examined work as well as retirement and full-time education. However, a significant form of unpaid work has so far been omitted from our discussion – caring for other people. Section 1 outlined the older nature of the white Irish population. Section 8 will look at the relatively high levels of ill health associated with this. This section examines whether these factors impact on the level of unpaid caring carried out by the white Irish population. The Census divides unpaid care into three different levels depending on the hours an individual devotes to it:

a. between 1 and 19 hours a week b. between 20 and 49 hours a week c. 50 or more hours a week

People providing the very highest level of care are unlikely to be able to work at the same time which impacts on their own life as well as on the lives of their dependents. However, even the lowest level of care-giving may restrict full-time and even part-time employment opportunities. Those providing only a low level of care may not be able to work if they have, in addition, their own children to care for. Employment opportunities may also be reduced if the care has to take place at particular hours of the day. Even care which has to be given at anti-social hours (such as through the night) may impede a carer’s ability to work if they don’t have an opportunity to sleep. The Census form defines care as being ‘any help or support [given] to family members, friends, neighbours or others because of long-term physical or mental ill-health or disability; or problems related to old-age’. To get a greater understanding of levels of unpaid care, it is important to look at different elements of the population – men, women, younger people, people of pensionable age – as each has a very different picture of care-giving. a. Between 1 and 19 hours a week of unpaid care To weave our way through this complex picture, we will take each level of care in turn, below, starting with those providing between 1 and 19 hours a week. Figures 23 and 24 look at the working age carers and Figures 25 and 26 look at pensionable age carers.

26

Figure 23. Proportion of men aged between 16 and pensionable age providing 1 to 19 hours a week of unpaid care

0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

6.1% of the region’s white Irish men in this age group provided between 1 and 19 hours of unpaid care each week – a smaller proportion than white Irish men in England (6.3%). The highest level of care is to be found in amongst white British men (7.6%) with the Indian population also at 7.6%. The white Irish population provides the fourth highest level. The lowest level is in the Chinese population (4.0%) Figure 24. Proportion of women aged between 16 and pensionable age providing 1 to 19 hours a week of unpaid care

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

Across the board, when looking at women in comparison with men in the same age group, the proportion providing between 1 and 19 hours of care rises by 2.2%. The white Irish population has one of the highest proportions of women in this category –

27

8.2% - second only to the white British population (10.0%). The lowest level is to be found in the Black African population (4.0%). The following figures look at the same level of care – 1 to 19 hours a week – but this time in the pensionable age group. Figure 25. Proportion of men of pensionable age providing between 1 and 19 hours a week of unpaid care

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

5.7% of white Irish men of pensionable age are providing this level of care. This compares with 7.8% of white British men – the highest proportion of men of all of the ethnic populations listed. The lowest proportion is found in the Chinese population – 3.1%.

28

Figure 26. Proportion of women of pensionable age providing between 1 and 19 hours a week of unpaid care

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

White -

Othe

r Whit

e

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South East

England

The range amongst women of pensionable age is higher – from the lowest at 4.2% (white and Black African women) to the highest at 8.4% (white other women). 7.7% of white British women are providing this level of care. White Irish women occupy an approximately mid-way point (5 populations having higher proportions, 6 having lower) – 6.4%. The following charts look at those people providing between 20 and 49 hours a week of unpaid care. Figures 27 and 28 look at carers aged between 16 and pensionable age and figures 29 and 30 look at carers of pensionable age.

29

b. Between 20 and 49 hours a week of unpaid care Figure 27. Proportion of men aged between 16 and pensionable age providing 20 to 49 hours a week of unpaid care

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

The chart above looks at men providing a higher level of care – between 20 and 49 hours each week. As the level of care has increased, the proportion of men involved has fallen overall by 6.6% - to 0.8%. Those communities in which the largest proportion of men participate are the Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations (both 1.7%). 0.9% of white Irish men are involved, as are 0.7% of white British men. Figure 28. Proportion of women aged between 16 and pensionable age providing 20 to 49 hours a week of unpaid care

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

1.2% of women aged between 16 and pensionable age are providing between 20 and 49 hours of care a week. This ranges from 0.8% amongst Chinese women, to 2.7% amongst Pakistani women. White Irish women provide the fifth lowest level of care (1.1%), 0.1% lower than white British women.

30

Figure 29. Proportion of men of pensionable age providing between 20 and 49 hours a week of unpaid care

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

Total

Whit

e - Briti

sh

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South East

England

1.2% of the men of this age are providing between 20 and 49 hours a week of unpaid care – 0.1% higher than the proportion of white Irish men. The highest level is amongst white and Black African men (3.5%) and the lowest is to be found amongst white and Asian men (0.6%). Figure 30. Proportion of women of pensionable age providing between 20 and 49 hours a week of unpaid care

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South East

England

General levels of care of this level in this age are similarly low amongst women as they are amongst the men (figure 29). The highest level is to be found in the white

31

and Black African population (2.3%), and the lowest level in the white and Asian population (0.9%) Amongst white Irish women it is 1.3%, and amongst white British women 1.1%. The following charts look at those people providing 50 hours or more of care a week. Figures 31 and 32 look at people aged 16 to pensionable age. Figures 33 and 34 look at people of pensionable age. c. 50 or more hours a week of unpaid care Figure 31. Proportion of men aged between 16 and pensionable age providing 50 hours or more a week of unpaid care

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

At the highest level of care provision (50 hours or more a week) a slightly higher proportion of Irish men are involved than white British men. 1.3% of white Irish men are providing 50 or more hours a week of unpaid care – more than 7 hours a day on average, in comparison with 1.2% of white British men. Two populations have higher proportions of men involved than white Irish men – Pakistani (1.5%) and Indian (1.3%).

32

Figure 32. Proportion of women aged between 16 and pensionable age providing 50 hours or more a week of unpaid care

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

Total

Whit

e - Briti

sh

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Black C

aribb

ean

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

Overall, 2.0% of the women of the South East aged between 16 and pensionable age are providing this highest level of weekly care. Only the Bangladeshi and Pakistani populations have higher proportions of women involved (3.8% and 4.3% respectively). 2.1% of white Irish women are providing this high level of unpaid care. Figure 33. Proportion of men of pensionable age providing 50 hours or more a week of unpaid care

0%

1%

1%

2%

2%

3%

3%

4%

4%

5%

5%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Black C

aribb

ean

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

3.7% of white Irish men of pensionable age are providing this high level of care – this compares with 3.8% of white British men. The highest level is to be found in the white and Black Caribbean population (4.7%) and the lowest level is to be found in the Bangladeshi population (1.2%).

33

Figure 34. Proportion of women of pensionable age providing 50 hours or more a week of unpaid care

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South East

England

Interestingly, when looking at the higher levels of care – more than 7 hours a day – the proportion of people of pensionable age providing such care is higher than those providing 20 to 49 hours a week. For women of pensionable age, the population most involved with this highest level of care is the Pakistani population (5.1%). Bangladeshi women are the least involved (2.5%). 3.2% of the white Irish population is providing this level of care as is 3.3% of the white British population. The data from this section indicates that there are relatively high levels of care in the white Irish population (in comparison with the other populations listed) in the following population groups: - Working age women – 1-19 hours a week of care - Working age men – 50+ hours a week of care - Pensionable age women – 50+ hours a week of care ____________________________________________________________________ In summary Providing care for a family member or other person can have a significant impact not only on the person caring but also on the dependents of the carer, as the time devoted to caring may mean that taking on employment is not possible. The above analysis demonstrates a complex pattern of care amongst the minority ethnic populations in the different age bands. What is needed is an assessment of the economic and health impacts of care provision as well as the support needs of those who are caring.

34

Section 5. Qualifications _____________________________________________________________________ This section looks at educational achievement as measured by the attainment of qualifications. While there is a whole range of educational attainment, this section examines the topics by two means – the attainment of no qualifications at all, and the attainment of the highest levels of qualifications. Figure 35. Proportion of 16 to 24 year olds with no qualifications

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

No qua

lifica

tions

: total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

Taking England as a whole, in the white Irish population aged between 16 and 24, 12.3% have no qualifications. In the South East, this percentage decreases to 9.8%. However, this remains a lower proportion than is found in the South East population generally (13.7%) and the white British population (13.8%). With the exception of the Indian population (9.0%), the white Irish population has the lowest proportion of 16 to 24 year olds with no qualifications. The highest proportion is to be found in the Bangladeshi population in which 22.2% have no qualifications.

35

Figure 36. Proportion of 16 to 24 years with qualifications at level 4/511

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Leve

l 4/5:

total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

20.8% of the white Irish population of the region aged between 16 and 24 have qualifications at these highest levels. Only two groups have higher proportions – ‘other white’ (23.9%) and Chinese (22.8%). The white British population fares relatively poorly – with 10.5% attaining levels 4 or 5. Figure 37. The proportion of the population with no qualifications

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

16 - 24 25 - 34 35 -49 50 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 74

white Irishwhite Britishall

The chart above clearly indicates how the older generations have a far greater proportion of people with no qualifications than the younger generations, reflecting changes in education. While 9.8% of 16 to 24 year old white Irish people had no qualifications, this rises to 60.1% of those aged between 65 and 74. However, there are also other patterns in existence. In the 16 to 24 and the 25 to 34 age groups, a lesser proportion of the white Irish population than the white British population have no qualifications. In all other age groups, the pattern is reversed. Amongst 50 to 59 year olds, for example, 38.6% of white Irish people in the region have no qualifications in comparison with 32.5% of the white British population.

11 Level 4/5 equates to a first degree, higher degree, NVQ levels 4-5, HNC, HND, qualified teacher status, qualified medical doctor, qualified dentist, qualified nurse, midwife, health visitor or equivalents.

36

Figure 38. The proportion of the population with qualifications at levels 4 or 5

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%

16 - 24 25 - 34 35 -49 50 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 74

white Irishwhite Britishall

With the exception of the 16 to 24 age group, many members of which may not have had time to reach higher levels of qualifications thus far, the general trend is downward as the older generations have fewer individuals with higher levels of qualifications. It is very apparent that more of the white Irish population are achieving these higher levels of qualifications than the rest of the population of the South East. For example, 46.8% of the white Irish population aged between 25 and 34 have higher levels of qualifications in comparison with 27.2% of the white British population. In the older age bands, the difference still exists but has been reduced. For example, in the 65 to 74 age band, 16.0% of white Irish people have these high level qualifications in comparison with 14.1% of white British people. Hickman and Walter (1997)12 notice the trend for a high proportion of the Irish population to have high level qualifications and term it a ‘brain drain’ – a tendency for some migrants to be highly qualified. They also recognise the tendency for other migrants to be ‘on the other end of the scale’ and have no qualifications at all. They create a picture of two extremes. _____________________________________________________________________ In summary Hickman and Walter (ibid) found a dual picture of Irish people in Britain. A high proportion of Irish people with high level qualifications and a high proportion of people with no qualifications. However, in terms of the younger sections of the white Irish population (those in the age bands below 35 years of age), there is a relatively small proportion of people with no qualifications at all.

12 Hickman MJ and Walter B (1997) Discrimination and the Irish Community in Britain, The Commission for Racial Equality

37

Section 6. Home tenure and accommodation type _____________________________________________________________________ The type of housing in which a community lives can say much about its position in society and about the impact of other community characteristics such as economic activity and income. Type and nature of housing can also impact on a community and affect how it functions in terms of, for example, health and well-being. This section looks at type of housing in broad terms – such as ownership and whether it is shared. Figure 39. Proportion of the population which owns own home

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Owns ho

me: tot

al

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

73.1% of the population of the population of the South East own their own home – a higher proportion than in England as a whole (69.3%). 69.8% of the white Irish population own their own home – 4.4% lower than the proportion of white British people (74.2%) but the fourth highest percentage over all. These figures include people who own their own home outright (have no further payments to make on it) and those who own it with the help of a mortgage or other loan. The following charts give this breakdown.

38

Figure 40. Proportion of the population which owns own home outright

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Owns ou

tright:

total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

While the extent of home ownership is lower amongst the white Irish population than in the white British population, the extent of outright ownership is higher – 27.8% in comparison with 25.4%. The proportion of outright home ownership in the white Irish population is larger than that found in any of the populations listed. The lowest level of outright ownership is in the Black African population – 6.0%. Figure 41. Proportion of the population which owns own home with a mortgage or loan

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Owns w

ith m

ortga

ge: to

tal

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

While 27.8% of the white Irish population of the region own their own home outright, a further 42.0% do so with the aid of a mortgage or other loan. This compares with 48.8% of the white British population. The highest proportion of such mortgage holders is in the Indian population (56.4%).

39

Figure 42. Proportion of the population in social housing

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Social

rent:

total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

13.1% of the population of the South East are in social housing (including properties rented from the local council) – 4% lower than the proportion of the population of England (4.5%). 13.0% of the white Irish population are in social housing in comparison with 13.2% of the white British population. Four of the populations above have lower proportions of people in social housing than is the case in the white Irish population. Highest levels are in the Bangladeshi population (37.5%). Figure 43. Proportion of the population in private rented accommodation

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Private

rente

d: tot

al

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

The highest levels of private rented accommodation are in the ‘white other’ and Black African populations – 27.8% and 34.0% respectively. 10.9% of the white Irish population lives in such accommodation. Three populations have smaller proportions in private rented accommodation – Black Caribbean (9.6%), Pakistani (8.5%) and white British (8.2%).

40

Figure 44. Proportion of the population in communal establishments

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

Commun

al: to

tal

Whit

e - Briti

sh

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

3.7% of the white Irish population of the South East lives in communal establishments. This compares with 2.1% of the white British population. In contrast, 12.7% of the Chinese population is living in communal establishments. These figures are disaggregated in the Census into medical and care communal establishments and other communal establishments. 1.6% of the white Irish population is living in medical and care communal establishments. This is the highest proportion of all the populations listed – the next highest being the Black African population (1.3%). A further 2.0% of the white Irish population are living in other communal establishments.

41

Figure 45a. Proportion of men in key examples of communal establishments in the South East (not including staff members) – by establishment type (whole numbers are given in parenthesis, neg. suggests numbers less than 20) White Irish

population White British population

Whole population

Psychiatric hospitals and homes

0.08% (32)

0.04% (1,405)

0.05% (1,829)

Nursing homes 0.18% (68)

0.14% (4,881)

0.15% (5,774)

Residential care homes 0.49% (182)

0.35% (10,909)

0.38% (12,836)

Prison service establishments

0.58% (218)

0.15% (5,487)

0.21% (8,056)

Probation/bail hostels 0.01% (neg.)

0.01% (128)

0.01% (149)

Figure 45b. Proportion of women in key examples of communal establishments in the South East (not including staff members) – by establishment type (whole numbers are given in parenthesis, neg. suggests numbers less than 20) White Irish

population White British population

Whole population

Psychiatric hospitals and homes

0.10% (43)

0.03% (1,118)

0.03% (1,392)

Nursing homes 0.52% (232)

0.39% (14,417)

0.42% (17,189)

Residential care homes 0.92% (459)

0.81% (27,193)

0.87% (31,442)

Prison service establishments

0.02% (neg.)

0.01% (197)

0.01% (492)

Probation/bail hostels 0.01% (neg.)

0% (neg.)

0% (26)

Noticeably, the male white Irish population has a significantly higher proportion of people in nursing homes, prisons and residential care homes and in prison in comparison with the white British population. In terms of residential care homes and nursing homes, this is likely to be related to the relative age of the male white Irish population in comparison with the rest of the population. However, there is no other data from the Census which can offer explanations for the proportion of the white Irish population in psychiatric hospitals and prison. Discussion surrounding a high proportion of Black Caribbean people in prisons and in psychiatric units suggests that direct and indirect racism13 has a significant role. This was the similar finding of Bracken et al 199814 in terms of hospital admissions for mental health issues for Irish people. They found that the neglect of the Irish community in this regard is untenable.

13 Direct racism is where a person is directly refused a service or receives physical abuse because of racism. Indirect racism is where a condition is imposed on a service which consequently means that an individual cannot achieve it. 14 Bracken P, Greenslade L, Griffin B, Smyth M, 1998, Mental health and ethnicity: an Irish dimension. British Journal of Psychiatry Vol 172 pp103-105.

42

Figure 46. Proportion of households comprising a lone pensioner

0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%20%

One pe

nsion

er: to

tal

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

25.0% of the white Irish population in the South East are aged over 64 – a high proportion in comparison with the other ethnic populations listed. It is thus perhaps not surprising that a relatively high proportion, 17.4% of white Irish households comprise a sole pensioner. This is the highest proportion of all the populations listed – the next highest being in the white British population –14.9%. Figure 47. Proportion of households with more than one related pensioner

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

Again, reflecting the high proportion of people of pensionable age in the white Irish population, a high proportion (9.7%) are living in households in which all inhabitants are pensioners who are related to each other (such as a married couple). This

43

compares to 0.4% of the Bangladeshi population, the lowest proportion of all those listed. There is a significant difference in terms of the size of the pensionable age populations of the white British and white Irish populations and there is also a significant difference in terms of pensioners living on their own. However, the difference between the white Irish population and the white British population disappears when looking at pensioner couples living together. 10.1% of white British households comprise related pensioners. This is higher than the proportion of such white Irish households. _____________________________________________________________________ In summary Housing can be very important in terms of a person’s health and well-being. The analysis of the relevant data in this section suggests that the white Irish population has a relatively high level of home ownership and, in comparison with the white British populations, a relatively high proportion of Irish people live in medical and care establishments including nursing homes, residential care homes, prison and psychiatric homes. There is a relatively high proportion of lone pensioner households in the white Irish population.

44

Section 7. Amenities _____________________________________________________________________ There are certain measures which are used by researchers to assess the quality of life of households. In the Census these include central heating, overcrowding, bathroom sharing and car ownership. Figure 48. Proportion of the population living without central heating

0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%20%

No cen

tral h

eatin

g: tot

al

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

4.9% of the population of the South East is living without central heating, in comparison with 7.3% of the population of England. In the South East, 5.0% of both the white British and white Irish populations is living without central heating. Five of the populations listed have smaller proportions living without central heating. In each of the populations listed, the proportion without central heating is lower in the South East than it is in England as a whole. This is particularly pronounced in the Pakistani population. There are a number of factors which may have an impact on the different levels of central heating. These include:

- Expense Central heating is an expensive investment. Economic activity is comparatively low amongst both white Irish men and white Irish women (section 2: Economic activity and inactivity). This leaves a relatively high proportion of the white Irish population living on forms of income other than earnings – pensions, benefits etc. In such situations, affording central heating may not be possible. - Home ownership Tenants may have no say in the type of heating provided by a landlord (private or otherwise). It is only when a home is owned by the occupier that they can make their own decisions about heating adaptations. There is a relatively high proportion of the white Irish population living in homes that they own (figure 39).

45

Figure 49. Proportion of population with an occupancy rating of –1 or less15

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Total

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

White -

Othe

r Whit

e

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Black C

aribb

ean

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

An occupancy rating of –1 or less suggests overcrowding. In the South East, 6.7% of the population are experiencing overcrowding in their home. This ranges from 5.8% amongst the white British population to 43.0% in the Bangladeshi population. The white Irish population has the second lowest proportion of people living in conditions described as overcrowded (7.7%). Figure 50. Proportion of the population living in households without sole use of shower/bath and toilet

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.6%

0.8%

1.0%

1.2%

1.4%

Total

Whit

e - Briti

sh

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

15 The occupancy rating in the Census assumes that every household, including one-person households, requires a minimum of two common rooms (excluding bathrooms). An occupancy rating of –1 implies that there is one room too few and that there is thus overcrowding in the household.

46

While 1.0% of the Black African population does not have sole use of a bath/shower and toilet in their home – the highest proportion of all the populations listed. This falls to 0.4% in the white Irish population and to 0.2% in the white British population. The white Irish population falls mid-way between the populations listed – 6 populations have higher proportions, 5 have lower proportions. Figure 51. The proportion of the population which does not own a car or van

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

27.1% of the white Irish population of the South East does not own either a car or a van. The group with the lowest level of car or van ownership is the Black African population (34.2% does not own one). 19.6% of the white British population does not own a car. One factor in the relatively low level of car ownership in the white Irish population could be expense – with low levels of economic activity (section 2: Economic activity and inactivity) leaving a proportion of the population reliant on forms of income other than a salary. Hickman and Walter (1997) suggest that, in large part, such issues as car ownership could be dependent on the tendency of the Irish population to ‘cluster’ in urban areas. __________________________________________________________________ In summary Like housing tenure, the picture provided by the Census data on amenities is a complex one. This section illustrates that a relatively high proportion of white Irish households are without a car. Each of these high proportions of ‘doing without’ may point, at least in part, towards relative poverty, although other factors will also play a part.

47

Section 8. Health _____________________________________________________________________ This section looks at the health of the population. This is not based on medical records or hospital admissions but on questions in the Census about how people rated their own health. There are two questions – whether people have limiting long-term illness and whether people feel themselves to be in good or poor health. Respondents were asked, in the Census form, whether they had ‘any long-term illness, health problem or disability which limits your daily activities or the work you can do’. The illnesses or disabilities that people were thinking of when answering this question must inevitably cover a very wide range of health issues including both physical and mental complaints. The key issue that the question presents is that of the long-lasting nature of the health issue or disability. The other question relating to people’s own analysis of their health, relates only to the previous twelve months. This is examined in figures 59 and 60 at the end of this section. The following figures look at the proportion of the population that said yes, they did have a limiting long-term illness. Figure 52. Proportion of 0 to 15 year old girls with limiting long-term illness

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

Limitin

g lon

g-term

illne

ss: to

tal

White -

British

White -

Irish

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Black A

frican

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

In the South East 3.3% of girls under 16 years old have a limiting illness. Amongst white Irish girls, this rises to 3.7% - close to the level amongst Black Caribbean girls (3.8%). The highest level is of Pakistani girls (4.7%). The level of long-term limiting illness amongst white Irish girls is the third highest of those listed – behind Pakistani girls and white Black Caribbean girls (4.1%).

48

Figure 53. Proportion of 0 to 15 year old boys with limiting long-term illness

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

Limitin

g lon

g-term

illne

ss: to

tal

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

Levels of limiting illness are slightly higher amongst young boys than girls – 4.5% overall. Amongst white Irish boys the proportion is slightly lower than amongst white British boys – 4.5% and 4.6% respectively. The population with the highest proportion is Black Caribbean (6.0%), the lowest is in the Indian population (3.1%). Figure 54. Proportion of 16 to 49 year old women with limiting long-term illness

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

Limitin

g lon

g-term

illne

ss: to

tal

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

1.0% of women in the South East aged between 16 and 49 have a limiting long-term illness – the same proportion as amongst white British women. White Irish women have the third highest incidence of limiting long-term illness (1.2%), after Pakistani women (1.8%) and Black Caribbean women (1.5%).

49

Figure 55. Proportion of 16 to 49 year old men with limiting long-term illness

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

Limitin

g lon

g-term

illne

ss: to

tal

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

Amongst men in this middle age group, limiting long-term illness rises dramatically, from 1.0% of the region’s women to 7.8% of the men. Amongst the white Irish population, the percentage is 8.6% - the fourth highest proportion of all the ethnic populations listed, after white and Black Caribbean men, Black Caribbean men, and white and Black African men. 8.0% of white British men in this age bracket have limiting long-term illness. Figure 56. Proportion of 50 to 64 year old women with limiting long-term illness

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Limitin

g lon

g-term

illne

ss: to

tal

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South East

England

20.0% of older women in the region have a limiting long-term illness. In the white Irish population, the proportion rises to 22.2%. The highest incidence is to be found in amongst Bangladeshi men (46.5%).

50

Figure 57. Proportion of 50 to 64 year old men with limiting long-term illness

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Limitin

g lon

g-term

illne

ss: to

tal

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South EastEngland

25.0% of white Irish men of this age bracket have limiting long-term illness – one in every four white Irish men are incapacitated in this way. This is the fourth highest incidence of all the populations listed. Amongst white British men, as amongst the population of the region as a whole, the proportion is under 20% (19.7% and 19.9% respectively). The highest incidence is amongst Bangladeshi men – 43.4%. Figure 58. Proportion of women aged 65 or over with limiting long-term illness

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Limitin

g lon

g-term

illnes

s: tot

al

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Afric

an

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South East

England

48.1% of the female population of the South East who are aged 65 or older, have a limiting, long-term illness. This proportion rises to 63.8% in the Bangladeshi population. White Irish women have the lowest proportion (46.2%) of each of the ethnic groups with the exception of ‘other white’ women (46.0%), Chinese women (42.2%) and white and Asian women (44.1%).

51

Figure 59. Proportion of men aged 65 or over with limiting long-term illness

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Limitin

g lon

g-term

illnes

s: tot

al

Whit

e - B

ritish

Whit

e - Iri

sh

Whit

e - O

ther W

hite

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Blac

k Cari

bbea

n

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Black A

frican

Mixed -

Whit

e and

Asia

n

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - I

ndian

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - P

akist

ani

Asian o

r Asia

n Briti

sh - B

angla

desh

i

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack C

aribb

ean

Black o

r Blac

k Briti

sh - B

lack A

frican

Chines

e or O

ther E

thnic

Group -

Chin

ese

South East

England

43.8% of white Irish older men have long-term limiting illness – a slightly higher proportion than the 43.7% of white British women – and positioning the incidence as the fourth highest of all the populations listed. The highest incidence is in the Bangladeshi population – 60.0%. Overall, 15.5% of the population of all ages, and both genders, in the South East have a limiting long-term illness in comparison with 17.9% of the population of England as a whole. The white Irish population is the ethnic group, of those listed, with the highest level in the region – 21.2%. The ethnic population with the next highest incidence are the white British population (15.9%) and the Black Caribbean population (14.3%). The high proportion amongst the white Irish population when looking at it over all ages and genders lies largely in the proportion of the population who are aged 65 and over where limiting long-term illnesses are more common, regardless of ethnic group (see figure 6). On the subject of health, the Census form also asked people if, over the previous 12 months, respondents would say that their health had been good, fairly good or not good. As health can fluctuate in a 12 month period, it is the responsibility of the respondent to find some form of average or overall feeling of health which may, of course, be affected by how the respondent was feeling, health-wise, at the time of completing the Census form. For under 16 year olds, it may be that parents are completing their Census details on their behalf which means that the health rating is likely to be the parent’s assessment rather than the child’s own assessment. The following two figures look at those respondents who rated their health as being not good.

52

Figure 60. Women not in good health

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0-15 16-49 50-64 65 +

white Irishwhite Britishall

It is clear from the data that being in not good health increases with age, as we would expect and as was illustrated in the incidence of limiting long-term illness. What is interesting is the comparatively greater experience of being in not good health amongst white Irish women between the ages of 16 and 64 – working age. 17.9% of white Irish women in the region and 14.8% of white British women aged between 16 and 64 are in not good health. 22.8% of white Irish women aged 65 and older are in not good health as are 21.7% of white British women. Figure 61. Men not in good health

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0-15 16-49 50-64 65 +

white Irishwhite Britishall

Amongst the men of the South East, the disparity between the experience of the white Irish population and that of the white British population is greater than that amongst the women. 23.6% of white Irish men aged between 16 and 64 are not in good health. This compares with 14.2% of white British men. 23.5% of white Irish men aged 65 and older are in not good health as are 19.2% of white British women. The health of a population is a complex issue with many inter-linked factors at play. Relatively high rates of long-term illness amongst Irish people are discussed at some length by Hickman and Walter (1997) as well as other commentators. What is clear is that there is no single answer to the matter of why there are relatively high levels of ill-health (and mortality) amongst Irish populations. The following are some of those factors which could be at play: Poverty and housing As established earlier in this report, the white Irish population has a comparatively low level of economic activity (section 2: Economic activity and inactivity) which implies reliance on other forms of income such as pensions and benefits. Likewise a relatively high proportion of the white Irish population is living in social housing (figure 42). Both of these factors may have an impact on the health of individuals. Socio-economic status As well as practical issues related to class, people of lower social classes may also view their own health differently bringing about reporting differences.

53

Changes brought about by the act of migration Living in a rural setting in Ireland and moving to an inner-city area of Birmingham, for example, can represent a significant change in a person’s life which may impact on their health. Negative experiences of host country and racism Many commentators have documented racism and discrimination experienced by Irish people in England both in the past and currently. Lifestyle factors The links between excessive alcohol consumption, smoking and poor diet and poor health are now clearly established and need to be taken into consideration when looking at any population experiencing poor health. Genetics In any discussion of health, genetics may play a factor. Certain illnesses (e.g. cancers) have strong genetic components. In a single community of people this may impact on the incidence of those illnesses. Occupation It has been established that a relatively high proportion of white Irish men work in construction (figure 21) and an even higher proportion of white Irish women work in health and social care (figure 22). While the Census data does not indicate the type of work undertaken in these broad fields, we know that construction includes many roles which are dangerous or cause ill-health and that many roles in health and social care involve long, anti-social hours, lifting and stress. _____________________________________________________________________ In summary The data in this section suggests that health is a particular issue for white Irish people in the region. This relates particularly to white Irish men of working age who are experiencing relatively high levels of limiting long-term illness. It also relates to men and women of working age who rate their own health as being not good.

54

FIS exists to represent and develop our members and our community

This report, one of a suite of twenty four, is an outcome of a research project on the Irish data in the 2001 Census. The data and commentaries in the suite of reports are presented in a comparative context at national, regional and selected local levels, and on the basis of the full sixteen categories from the 2001 Census Ethnic Group Question.

... there are sections of the Irish population who have multiple needs, are marginalised, and have information, support and service needs ... to be addressed.

We have been disappointed by the structuring of much of the analysis of ethnicity data from the 2001 Census published todate, particularly the use of various “combined ethnic group categories” and the failure to disaggregate the White ”combined group” data. Increasingly, micro-decisions about delivery of services take place at a local level. ... Those with local responsibility under the Race Relations Acts for addressing inequalities must have the best possible local data on all significant communities (including minority ethnic communities) at their disposal, and must use it in an inclusive way to inform their policies. Dr Mary Tilki Chair, Federation of Irish Societies

London Office95 White Lion StreetLondon N1 9PFTel 020 7833 1226Fax 020 7833 3214info@irishsocieties.orgwww.irishsocieties.org

Birmingham Office: Suite 211, Keys Court82-84 Moseley StreetBirmingham B12 ORTTel 0121 622 4169Fax 0121 622 5613

Manchester Office:EMF House12 Charlotte StreetManchester M1 4FLTel 0161 245 3221Fax 0161 245 3315

Price £5.00