southern methodist universitypsyc 3382 1 conducting ethical research chapter 3
TRANSCRIPT
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 33821
Conducting Ethical Research
Chapter 3
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 33822
Ethics in Research
• Milgram Obedience Studies – Teacher and Learner– Teacher asks Learner questions– When learner is wrong, teacher shocks
him/her– Teacher increases voltage with each
wrong answer– Experimenter: “The experiment
requires that you continue”
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 33823
Research with Human Participants
• Potential Issues– Protection of Participants– Protection of the field (liability)– Protection of Research
• Future participation• Maintaining funding
– Protection of Institutions• IRB
– Ethical use of research Implications
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 33824
Human Research (2)
• Potential Areas of Ethical Issues– Treatment of Participants
• IV manipulations– Velten mood induction
» Is it ethical to manipulate the mood of participants?» Read self-depressing statements» Watch very sad scenes of movies» Listen to sad music (Russian death march)
– Conflict» Is it ethical to create conflicts between
participants?– What if the IV creates a strong, positive effect?
» Is it ethical to exclude some participants from the benefits of a favorable manipulation?
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 33825
American Psychological Association (APA) Code
1. Investigator has ethical responsibility with research design
2. Determine level of participant risk3. Investigator has oversight of
ethical considerations (treatment by all involved)
4. Establish clear and fair agreement for participation
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 33826
APA Code (2)
5. Deception– Determination of value research– Debrief afterward to explain deception
6. Freedom to decline participation7. Prevent physical or mental
discomfort, harm, or danger and get informed consent about these risks
8. Researcher should debrief after completion of the study
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 33827
APA Code (3)
9. Researcher has responsibility to detect and remove negative consequences of participation
10.Maintain confidentiality at all times– Issue: Freedom of Information Act
• Is research supported by federal funds subject to FOIA?
• If so, how much is public? Names, data, results?
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 33828
Informed Consent and Deception
• Inform of “all aspects of the research that might reasonably be expected to influence willingness to participate…”– How do you define “reasonably”?
• Reasonable man, woman, and person standards in law
• Informed consent: Potential participants must be in a position to decide whether to participate in an experiment
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 33829
Deception (2)
• Cover story: provide a plausible explanation for the research procedures to cover true intention or procedure
• Deception: Research technique in which the participant is mislead about some aspect of the project– Used to control for participant reactivity– Might be as simple as stating that a different
aspect of the manipulation is what is of interest (e.g. Ss told measuring attitudes but actually interested in group interaction)
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338210
Deception (3)
• Why is deception necessary (sometimes)?– Reactivity– Social desirability– Response acquiescence/deviance– Manipulate different mental states
• Conflict vs. cooperation mental sets have effects on social categorization
• Imagining that you are in conflict is different than being in conflict
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338211
Deception (4)
• Follows ethical philosophy of Utilitarianism– Greatest good for the greatest number of
people• Ethics = (-6 units of harm X 40 Ss) + (+1 units of
good X 5000 people) (-240 + 5000 = 4760)
– Tradeoff between deception of participants and importance of the question being addressed
• Fully informed consent is the norm, and greater scrutiny is provided in cases where there is less than full information
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338212
Freedom to Withdraw
• Participants are allowed to withdraw from participation at any time
• Do you give participation credit for completion of study or for volunteering?
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338213
Protection from Harm
• Harm is both physical and psychological
• Research participation can often have unintended effects– Frustration from inability to complete
a cognitive or memory task– Learn something undesirable about
yourself
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338214
Debriefing
• Researcher explains the general purposes of the research– Much more detailed when the
research involved deception• Explain that there was deception• Explain why the deception was necessary
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338215
Removing Harmful Consequences
• Induce positive mood after a negative mood induction manipulation
• Provide contact information for helping resources
• Tell them what to expect and how to react to the consequences
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338216
Confidentiality
• Information is confidential unless otherwise agreed
• Personal information is not revealed (name, SS#, phone #, etc.)
• What if you give a depression test and find someone is suicidal or severely depressed?
• Competing ethical principles
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338217
Animal Research Ethics
• Many psychology departments that once had animal labs no longer do
• Animals are often used to answer questions that would be impossible or impractical to answer with humans
• Arguments against animal research:– Animals feel pain and their lives can be
destroyed– Destroying any living thing is dehumanizing– Speciesism: neglecting the rights of other
species
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338218
Animal Research Ethics (2)
• Arguments for animal research– Utility: animals are harmed or killed only if
absolutely necessary (no intentional torture) and the implications of the research is worthwhile
– We almost all use animal products or animal-tested products daily
• Meat, drugs, clothing• Cosmetics – no animal testing b/c deemed not
worthwhile
– Some animal research benefits animals• Find non-lethal methods of crop protection
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338219
Animal Research Ethics (3)
• Guidelines for their use– Ethics are not always yes/no issues, but process
issues (how they are used)• Care, use, and disposal of animals• Supervision and accountability• Minimize discomfort and pain• If termination is necessary, do it rapidly and painlessly
– We are more willing to accept euthanasia for animals in pain, so we do have some different standards
– Not an easy issue: Only really good argument is utility
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338220
Ethics in Drug Research
• Qualified researchers using regulated procedures
• Different standards for different drugs– Drug classification
• Some drugs are considered as having no value (treatment or research)
– Standards change with the times– LSD was thought to be a particularly promising
drug for understanding insanity, consciousness
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338221
Bias in Research
• Inadvertent researcher bias– Researchers are fallible and have
own ideas, beliefs, politics• Avoiding bias
– Double-blind studies• Removing bias in interpretations
– Placebo studies– Control groups
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338222
No Control Group
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
10 20 30
Caffeine (mg)
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338223
Control Group
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 10 20 30
Caffeine (mg)
Southern Methodist University
PSYC 338224
Fraud
• Fraud (deliberate bias) is a separate issue than normal research ethics and is (fortunately) rare– Faking data or altering data– Not presenting data that disagree with
one’s opinions– Peer review process (oversight)– There are ways for fraudulent research
to enter the mainstream database (citation chain)