southern nevada water authority the colorado river and nevada association of california water...
TRANSCRIPT
Southern Nevada Water Authority
The Colorado River and Nevada
Association of California Water AgenciesFall 2010 Conference
December 1, 2010
Southern Nevada Water Authority
Background:
Law of the River
Colorado River Hydrology
Southern Nevada Water Authority
3
Colorado River Basin
16.5 million acre-feet (maf) allocated annually
1.7 maf lost to evaporation annually
15.1 maf average annual “natural” inflow into Lake Powell over past 100 years
66% of average annual inflow to Lake Powell for last 9 years
Irrigates 3 million acres Serves about 30 million people
including Phoenix, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Denver, Albuquerque and San Diego areas
Southern Nevada Water AuthorityBeginning in 2000, severe drought conditions
began affecting the Colorado River Basin.
Fishing Dock at Lake Mead Marina - Nov. 2008
Southern Nevada Water Authority
20102000Hoover Dam, Lake MeadHoover Dam, Lake Mead
Since that time, Lake Mead’s elevation
has dropped by more than 100 feet.
Southern Nevada Water Authority
6
Natural FlowColorado River at Lees Ferry - Water Year 1906 to 2010
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Water Year
An
nu
al F
low
(M
AF
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Average 10-yr Average
Provisional data, subject to change Estimated values for 2008-2010
Southern Nevada Water Authority
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
775 975 1175 1375 1575 1775 1975
Year
Lee
s F
err
y N
atu
ral F
low
(m
af)
Meko et al.
Annual Natural Flow at Lees FerryTree-ring Reconstruction (Meko et al., 2007)
25-Year Running Mean
Southern Nevada Water Authority
Colorado River
Southern Nevada Water Authority
9
Colorado Resources Used to Meet Demands
Basic Apportionment
- 300,000 acre-feet for Nevada
Intentionally Created Unused Apportionment
- Water banking agreements with California and Arizona
Intentionally Created Surplus
Southern Nevada Water Authority
Existing Law of the River Concerning Shortages
Southern Nevada Water Authority
11
Existing Law of the River Concerning Shortage
1944 Treaty between the United States and Mexico- In the event of extraordinary drought or serious accident to
the irrigation system in the United States, Mexico will be reduced in the same proportion as consumptive uses in the United States are reduced
Southern Nevada Water Authority
12
Existing Law of the River Concerning Shortage
1964 U.S. Supreme Court Decree Arizona v. California, Article II(B)(3)
- If less than 7.5 million acre-feet is available, Secretary of the Interior will satisfy demands based on present perfected water rights regardless of state lines
- Anything remaining will be apportioned in accordance with the Boulder Canyon Project Act
- California will not receive more than 4.4 million acre-feet
Southern Nevada Water Authority
13
Existing Law of the River Concerning Shortage
1968 Colorado River Basin Project Act
- When there is insufficient water to meet lower basin demands, Central Arizona Project shall be limited as to assure the availability of water for consumptive uses of present perfected rights
- Nevada shall not bear in shortages greater than it would have to before this Act
- Act does not affect relative priorities of water in CA, AZ, and NV that are senior to Central Arizona Project
Southern Nevada Water Authority
2007 Interim Guidelines and Associated Agreements
Southern Nevada Water Authority
15
Background
In January 2001, the Secretary of the Interior adopted the Colorado River Interim Surplus Guidelines to identify the conditions that are used to determine the availability of surplus water for Arizona, California, and Nevada
Following the adoption of the Interim Surplus Guidelines, drought significantly reduced the storage levels in Lakes Powell and Mead
Southern Nevada Water Authority
16
Background
At that time, significant disagreements between the Upper and Lower Basins, as well as among the Lower Basin States included:
- 2005 Annual Operating Plan disagreement- Article II(B)(2) of the Decree in AZ v. CA (50/46/4)- Quantity and timing of shortages
In May 2005, the Secretary announced a process to develop Lower Basin shortage guidelines and explore management options for the operation of Lakes Powell and Mead, which began the initiation of a NEPA process
Southern Nevada Water Authority
17
Background In February 2006, the Seven States sent a Preliminary
Proposal to the Secretary regarding Colorado River interim operations in response to NEPA scoping
Preliminary proposal focused on four primary elements:- Modification and extension of Interim Surplus Guidelines- Coordinated reservoir operation between Lakes Powell and Mead- Quantified shortages in the Lower Basin based on Lake Mead water
elevations- Creation of Intentionally Created Surplus program (ICS)
Preliminary Proposal also attached a Draft Agreement among the Seven States
The Seven States’ Agreement designed a cooperative process to avoid conflicts between the states
Southern Nevada Water Authority
18
Background
In December of 2007 the Secretary of the Interior issued a Record of Decision for Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and the Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead and adopted all of the main components of the Basin States Proposal
Southern Nevada Water Authority
19
Intentionally Created Surplus (ICS)
Nevada can create and utilize Intentionally Created Surplus by conveying Nevada groundwater and water from the Virgin and Muddy Rivers through Lake Mead
The Shortage Sharing Agreement and Interim Guidelines provide that this water will be available during declared shortages as Developed Shortage Supply (DSS)
Southern Nevada Water Authority
20
Allows a water user to fallow water rights in tributaries that were in use prior to the effective date of the Boulder Canyon Project Act (1929)
- Water is transported through the Colorado River- Nevada has approximately 50,000 acre-feet within this
category on the Virgin and Muddy rivers (SNWA currently owns or controls about 30,000 acre-feet)
Can be taken during shortage (DSS)
Tributary Conservation
Southern Nevada Water Authority
21
Allows a water user to fund a system efficiency project that would conserve Colorado River water
Such projects include the Drop 2 Reservoir Project and the operation of the Yuma Desalting Plant
The project must increase the amount of water available in the U.S. and a portion of the saved water is credited to the user funding the project
Cannot be taken during shortage
System Efficiency Projects
Southern Nevada Water Authority
22
Drop 2 Reservoir ProjectSystem Efficiency ICS Project
Southern Nevada Water Authority
23
Drop 2 Reservoir Project
Design and construction cost originally estimated at $172 million (with 20% contingency, $206 million)
- $9.6 million has already been refunded to the states and additional refunds are expected as the project closes out
SNWA provided $114.66 million to fund the design, construction and operation of the Drop 2 reservoir and SNWA will receive up to 400,000 acre-feet of ICS credits
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and the Central Arizona Water Conservation District exercised their option to contribute $28.67 million each in return for 100,000 acre-feet each of ICS credits
Southern Nevada Water Authority
First Fill – Drop 2 Reservoir
24
Southern Nevada Water Authority
25
Allows non-Colorado River system water to be conveyed through and diverted from system reservoirs
- Includes SNWA’s Coyote Spring groundwater rights that will be introduced into Lake Mead via the Muddy River (Currently 9,000 acre-feet)
Can be taken during shortage (DSS)
A pipeline has been constructed and water deliveries began in November 2010
Imported ICS
Southern Nevada Water Authority
26
Intentionally Created Unused Apportionment
Southern Nevada Water Authority
27
Existing Law of the River concerning Surplus and Unused Water
1964 U.S. Supreme Court Decree Arizona v. California (2006 Consolidated Decree), Article II(B)(2)
- If more than 7.5 million acre-feet is available for consumptive use the Secretary of the Interior will apportion 50% to California, 46% to Arizona, and 4% to Nevada
1964 U.S. Supreme Court Decree Arizona v. California (2006 Consolidated Decree), Article II(B)(6)
- If, in one year, water apportioned for use in a State will not be consumed, the Secretary of the Interior may release the apportioned but unused water for consumptive use in other states
- No rights to recurrent use of the water shall accrue
Southern Nevada Water Authority
28
Existing Law of the River concerning Surplus and Unused Water
1999 Final Rule for Offstream Storage of Colorado River Water (43 CFR Part 414)
- Regulation promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior to establish a procedural framework for facilitating interstate off-stream banking transactions including a commitment by the Secretary to release Intentionally Created Unused Apportionment (ICUA) as a part of such transactions
Southern Nevada Water Authority
29
Intentionally Created Unused Apportionment
SNWA has entered into interstate water banking agreements with both California and Arizona
Agreements allow for SNWA to store water in California, and at a later date when SNWA needs the water, California will intentionally reduce their consumptive use below 4.4 MAF and the unused water will be directed to SNWA
Southern Nevada Water Authority
30
Interstate Water Banking Agreement with Arizona
Original agreement signed in 2001, amendments entered into in 2004 and 2009
Guaranteed 1.25 million acre-feet of credits for SNWA with return flow credits for an estimated diversion of 2.125 million acre-feet
Allowed Nevada to utilize Arizona bank to make up shortages, unless a shortage impacts Arizona municipalities, then Nevada will reduce recovery proportionally to Arizona’s municipal shortage
Established SNWA schedule to pay $330 million between 2005 and 2018
* AWBA has stored approximately 527,000 acre-feet of credits for SNWA
Southern Nevada Water Authority
Unused Apportionment in 2010
Nevada is likely to have unused apportionment in 2010
On November 8, 2010, SNWA and the Metropolitan Water District of California submitted a letter to the Regional Director of the Lower Colorado River Region of the Bureau of Reclamation requesting this water be left in Lake Mead to benefit system storage and help delay the onset of shortages instead of being reallocated in accordance with Article II(B)(6)
31
Southern Nevada Water Authority
Conservation
Southern Nevada Water Authority
33
Southern Nevada recycles nearly every drop of water that is used indoors and receives return-flow credits for this water
Indoor Water Use
Southern Nevada Water Authority
The Water Smart Landscapes Program rebates businesses and homeowners $1.50 for every
square-foot of turf removed and replaced with water efficient landscape.
Program Results• $164,700,000 rebated
148,353,000 square feet converted• 8 billion gallons saved annually
More than 41 billion gallons saved since inception
Southern Nevada Water Authority
35
1990 - 2008 Gallons Per Capita Per Day (GPCD) Water Usage
Water Conservation
347 344 339 337 329 327 329 322 317 315 315 318 314294
274 269 264255 249
199
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Previous Goal Attained: 250 GPCD by 2010
New Goal: 199 GPCD by 2035
2035
Southern Nevada Water Authority
36
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Wate
r U
se (
Acr
e-f
eet)
270,000 265,000 265,000 265,000
325,000
278,000262,000
Water Conservation Achievements
Southern Nevada's annual water consumption decreased by approximately 20 billion gallons between 2002 and 2008, despite a
population increase of 400,000 during that span
Southern Nevada Water Authority
37
Meeting Future DemandsSummary of Projected Water Demands and Water Resources
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Wa
ter
De
ma
nd
s (
ac
re-f
ee
t)
Conservation
Colorado River and
Las Vegas Valley Groundwater
Future Resources to Full Consumption
Southern Nevada Water Authority
Questions