soy transportation coalition national waterways conference march 28, 2012

12
Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

Upload: miette

Post on 23-Feb-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012. Why Should Farmers Care About Transportation? … Because our international competitiveness depends on it. Costs of transporting soybeans: U.S. vs. Brazil (per metric ton; 4 th quarter, 2011) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

Soy Transportation CoalitionNational Waterways Conference

March 28, 2012

Page 2: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

Why Should Farmers Care About Transportation? …Because our international competitiveness depends on it.

Costs of transporting soybeans: U.S. vs. Brazil (per metric ton; 4th quarter, 2011)

Davenport, Iowa to Shanghai North Mato Grosso to ShanghaiTruck - $10.22 Truck - $115.05Barge - $28.91 ---------Ocean - $55.33 Ocean – $49.65Total Trans - $94.46 Total Trans - $164.70Farm Value - $425.00 Farm Value - $358.24Landed Cost - $519.46 Landed Cost - $522.94Trans. as % of Land. Cost – 18.18% Trans. as % of Land. Cost –

31.50%

Source: USDA

Page 3: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

Why Should Farmers Care About Waterways? …Because farmer profitability is impacted by it.

Page 4: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

The Soy Transportation Coalition – Farmer funded & farmer led Established in 2007. Comprised of 11 state soybean councils, the

United Soybean Board, American Soybean Association. National Grain & Feed Association & National Oilseed Processors: ex-officio members.

Page 5: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

Panama Canal Expansion – Opportunity for increased efficiency, or are we shifting the bottleneck?

Pre Panama Canal Expansion (70 miles)

Post Panama Canal Expansion (111 miles)

Post Panama Canal Expansion (161 miles)

Page 6: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

America’s Locks & Dams: A Ticking Time Bomb for Agriculture?Volume of Commodity Flows (2010) Illinois River

Grain: 24 million tons (20%) Coal: 13 million tons (11%) Petroleum: 19 million tons (16%)

Mississippi River Grain: 236 million tons (48%) Coal: 51 million tons (10%) Petroleum: 19 million tons (4%)

Ohio River Grain: 49 million tons (5%) Coal: 614 million tons (59%) Petroleum: 58 million tons (6%)

Page 7: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

America’s Locks & Dams: A Ticking Time Bomb for Agriculture?Cost to Agricultural Producers of Lock Closures($ millions):Lock 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 1

YearLaGrange $2.7 $4.8 $21.2

$30.4Lock 20 $2.8 $4.9 $15.4 $44Lock 25 $2.8 $4.9 $15.4 $44.1Markland $0.89 $1.02 $3.8 $4.9Lock 52 $2.9 $3.1 $11.9 $13.9

Page 8: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

America’s Locks & Dams: A Ticking Time Bomb for Agriculture?Most affected districts by lock failure (both

production & consumption) LaGrange

Illinois District #20 Reduction in corn prices: 7 cents per ton Reduction in soybean prices: $2.45 per ton Total cost to agriculture: $4.3 million

Page 9: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

America’s Locks & Dams: A Ticking Time Bomb for Agriculture?Lost Revenue to Barge Companies from Lock

Closures ($ millions):Lock 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 1

YearLaGrange $3.6 $5.6 $4.3

$104Lock 20 $5.1 $15 $33.3 $150Lock 25 $5.1 $14.2 $32.4 $162Markland $2.2 $4.7 $7.3 $11Lock 52 $17.2 $26.1 $68 $71.5

Page 10: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

Is it time to ask some tough questions?

Argument #1: How we allocate money is just as important as how much money we allocate. Comparison: U.S. lock & dam projects vs. foreign

examples Describe alternative funding mechanisms that

provide: 1.) Money up front & 2.) Greater certainty Explore potential for foreign investment

Page 11: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

Is it time to ask some tough questions?

Argument #2: A predictably good inland waterway system is better than a hypothetically great one. Should we transition from a “build & expand”

approach to a “preserve & maintain” approach? Viability? What would that look like? Cost savings?

Page 12: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012

Thank YouSoy Transportation Coalition

1255 SW Prairie Trail ParkwayAnkeny, Iowa 50023

515-727-0665515-251-8657 (fax)

www.soytransportation.org

Mike Steenhoek, Executive [email protected]