spatial reasoning for “terra incognita” challenges and progress of coastal/marine gis dawn...

32
Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Upload: hilary-joseph

Post on 19-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS

Dawn WrightDepartment of GeosciencesOregon State University

Page 2: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Explornography (n.)

“The vicarious thrill of exploring when there is nothing left to explore”

(John Tierney, New York Times, July 26, 1998)

Page 3: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University
Page 4: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Images courtesy of the National Air and Space Museum

Page 5: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University
Page 6: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University
Page 7: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University
Page 8: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University
Page 9: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Ocean Thematic Layers

Graphic courtesy of Christina Massel, Steve Miller, Scripps

Page 10: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Single Beam Multibeam

1-2 K soundingsper survey

500 - 750 K soundingsper survey

400,000 – 1,000,000 K soundingsper survey

Graphics courtesy of NOAA & UNH

Bottom Coverage & Data Density by Survey MethodLeadline

Page 11: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

courtesy of the NOAA PMEL Vents Group (NEMO project) and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Exploration of Seafloor Spreading Centers

QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video decompressorare needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video decompressorare needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aVideo decompressor

are needed to see this picture.QuickTime™ and a

Sorenson Video 3 decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 12: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Fine Scale Mapping

• on the order of tens of meters to meters

• features the size of a beer can!

Page 13: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

GIS: A Spatial ContextIntegrating Many Parts to See the Whole

Homes

School Districts

Streets

Zip Codes

Cities

Counties

Graphics courtesy of ESRI

Page 14: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Substrate

Bathymetry

Water Column Data

Time and Depth Measurements

Coastal and Boundary Lines

Marine Points

Basemap

Ocean Thematic Layers

Graphics courtesy of Joe Breman, ESRI

Page 15: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Ocean Thematic Layers

Page 16: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

GIS: A Spatial ContextIntegrating Many Parts to See the Whole

Graphics courtesy of ESRI

Page 17: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Spatial Reasoning

PlanningPlanningPlanningPlanning

AnalyzingAnalyzingAnalyzingAnalyzing

ThinkingThinkingThinkingThinking

MeasuringMeasuringMeasuringMeasuring DecidingDecidingDecidingDeciding

ScienceGraphics courtesy of ESRI

Page 18: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

GIS: A Spatial ContextSeeing the Whole to Manage Places

Seeing the WholeSeeing the Whole Managing PlacesManaging Places

• Estuaries

• Fisheries

• Marine Protected Areas

• Coastal Communities

• Patterns

• Linkages

• Trends

Graphics courtesy of ESRI

Page 19: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Coastal/Marine GIS Challenges

• Lack of data

Dan Fornari, WHOI

Page 20: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Coastal/Marine GIS Challenges

• Scale, accuracy, generalization, time, etc.

• No fixed features in the marine environment– No rigid reference frame– Eulerian vs. Lagrangian (object-centered)– “Mobile computing”

Page 21: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Figure courtesy of Anne Lucas, U. of Bergen, NorwayFigure courtesy of Anne Lucas, U. of Bergen, Norway

Page 22: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Marine Boundaries

Page 23: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Shaded relief image © Ray Sterner, Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

• 2 horizontal dimensions equivalent?– “How long is a shoreline?” – Shoreline according to

whom?

Page 24: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Where is the shoreline?

Different interpretations of the shoreline

Page 25: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Shoreline Depiction Problems

Page 26: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

One Grand Challenge …

To find ways of summarizing, modeling, and visualizing the differences between a digital representation and real phenomena

• Uncertainty– no representation can be complete– what the data indicate about the world– what the user believes the data indicate about the world

• Scientific Measurement– the database as one sample from an error distribution

• The GIS Data Model– conceptual description of how our “sampling of the world”

is organized for use by the GIS – objects with rules and behaviors

Page 27: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

ArcGIS Marine Data Modeldusk.geo.orst.edu/djl/arcgis

Page 28: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

• Relationships with rules, behaviors used in geoprocessing and analysis

• Basic template for implementing GIS projects– input, formatting, geoprocessing, creating maps,

performing analyses

• Control of required data fields, relationships from collection through analysis phases

• Basic framework for writing program code

A Marine Data Model

Page 29: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Implications for Data Collection

Page 30: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Implications for Data Sharing, Networking

Page 31: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University
Page 32: Spatial Reasoning for “Terra Incognita” Challenges and Progress of Coastal/Marine GIS Dawn Wright Department of Geosciences Oregon State University

Remainder of Symposium

• Biogeographic Assessments– Monaco/Caldow, NOAA

• Benthic Habitat Mapping– Greene et al., Moss Landing Marine Labs

• O.C.E.A.N. Model, Marine Ecology/Economy– Scholz - Ecotrust

• Fisheries Landing Statistics– Watson et al. - University of British Columbia

• Science and Policy of MPAs– Airame - Channel Islands Nat. Marine Sanctuary

• Sustainable Coastal Communities– Wedell & Revell - Oregon State Univ., Surfrider