speakers patrick bruce and chris bath sut 18/06/14 · speakers patrick bruce and chris bath sut...

28
Design considerations for subsea metrology measurements Speakers Patrick Bruce and Chris Bath SUT 18/06/14

Upload: truongnga

Post on 04-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Design considerations for subsea

metrology measurements

Speakers Patrick Bruce and Chris Bath SUT 18/06/14

Design Considerations for Subsea metrology measurements

• Mechanical Design considerations

• Measurement requirements

• Required measurement and what can be achieved

• Examples of metrology measurements

• Mechanical Jig Metrology

• Bracket Design and offset measurements

• Golden rules for Metrology

• Engineering Considerations for spools, Risers, pipe work (Patrick

Bruce)

Topics to be discussed

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 2

Design Considerations for Subsea metrology measurements

• Material properties (Pipe size, wall thickness, composition of

the metal)

• Fabrication tolerances

• Expansion/ Contraction of the pipe work due to heat/cooling.

• Installation tolerance between each end (heading, pitch, roll and

position)

• Seabed friction (if applicable)

• Accuracy of subsea measurement

• Optimise costs for all of the above

Design Consideration

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 3

Additional Engineering Considerations

Flow rate

Design life

pressure rating

Design Considerations for Subsea metrology measurements

Measurement Definitions

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 4

Criterion Definition

Accuracy Is the degree of exactness which the final product

corresponds to the measurement standard.

Precision Refers to the ability of a measurement to be consistently

reproduced.

Reliability Refers to the consistency of accurate results over

consecutive measurements over time.

Traceability

Refers to the ongoing validations that the measurement

of the final product conforms to the original standard of

measurement

• Engineers think +/- millimetres

• Surveyors think a range of centimetres

• Engineers do not understand accuracy's that can be achieved subsea

• Surveyors do no understand the design requirements.

• Engineers can normally widen the tolerances by making a few

modifications. But this usually adds costs.

• Surveyors can assist engineering with the choice of equipment, but

high accuracy comes at a price.

• We need to get together

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 5

Engineers and Surveyors

Design Considerations for Subsea metrology measurements

Examples of Metology measurement

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 6

Replacement Platform Brace due to vessel damage

• Initial inspection with Rope access and

Air Divers

• Measurements taken with steel tape

passed from rope access to air diver.

• Considerations

• Tidal Current

• Crane access from vessel

• Access for Diamond wire cutter

• Control of replacement brace.

• Decision to provide like for like brace

but provide reduced length of 100mm

each end.

• Manufacture Clamps to hold brace in

position.

• Clamps to take up to - 100m + -100m

for end prep.

Examples of Metrology measurement

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 7

Tow Head Pipe work replacement

• Limited space inside the tow head

• Diver access also an issue

• Divers vision is difficult due to parallax in their helmets.

Examples of Metrology measurement

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 8

1. Only Design dimensions available

2. Measurement between lower cross

member and hang off point

required.

Replacement riser

Mechanical Jig Metrology

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 9

Metrology Jig

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 10

Level and distance measurement

Mechanical Jig Metrology

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 11

Metrology Jigs

Mechanical Jig Metrology

Pipe Centre tool

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 12

Mechanical Jig Metrology

Hydrostatic Measurement

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 13

Mechanical Jig Metrology

Design Considerations for Subsea metrology measurements

• Time spent on making good brackets so that offsets are known

in XY & Z is a sound investment.

• Use of Gyros to obtain heading pitch and roll measurements.

Importance of knowing where the measurements are taken from

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 14

Bracket design and offset measurement

• Good Bracket easy to fit by ROV, but are the flange offsets known and to what

accuracy?

Transponder bracket hung off a tree

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 15

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 16

Reference point measurements and offsets in X, Y and Z

Flange Flange

Bracket design and offset measurement

Example of transponder bucket to be

inserted into a flange

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 17

Example of transponder bucket to be

inserted into a manifold pile guide.

Bracket design and offset measurement

• Early discussion on requirements with design engineers is required, surveyors to be

aware of the range of metrology tools that could provide the accuracy needed.

• If a measurement cannot be competently measured then the design has to change or

an alternative measuring system to accommodate is to be considered,

• If a project critical measurement has to me made then it should be given the planning

and time offshore to provide a successful measurement.

• The importance of brackets cannot be underestimated. Consider additional

measurements if reliant on ROV placing brackets

• Never use just one system to measure anything always use a coarse measurement

system to ensure no gross errors are made. This provides confidence in the

measurement.

• Always use two methods of calculating the correct measurement, I suggest Pre made

spread sheet with the estimated distance and Angles and AutoCAD.

Golden Rules for Metrology

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 18

Design Considerations for Subsea metrology measurements

Tie-in Spool – Flange Misalignment – A Design Engineers Perspective

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 19

Pipeline

20

0m

m

Linear

misalignment

200mm

Angular

misalignment

2.5o Typical “Z” – type tie-in

spool.

Structure Tie-in

Plan View

Plan view on

flange

misalignment

HOW MUCH FLANGE MISALIGNMENT IS TOO MUCH?

i.e. BEFORE EITHER THE PIPE OR THE FLANGE IS

OVERSTRESSED?

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 20

Example of Pipe stress software output.

• Software is used to displace the flange to the required

misalignment (linear and angular).

• The spool is put into bending as a result of the flange

misalignment

• The resulting stress in both the pipe and flange is calculated.

• The allowable stress for Duplex and Super Duplex materials is

heavily de-rated compared to carbon steel. This is due to a

propensity to hydrogen induced cracking. The hydrogen comes

from the anodes.

• +90% of production manifolds consist of duplex or super

duplex piping / tie-in spools. Therefore, accurate metrology and

fabrication is regularly required to ensure spools are not

rejected offshore.

Tie-in Spool – Flange Misalignment – A Design Engineers Perspective

Tie-in Spool – Flange Misalignment – A Design Engineers Perspective

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 21

How much could a flange be misaligned?

The following contribute to flange misalignment and include actual results:

• Pipe work fabrication tolerances

Induction bend - tolerance on angle +/-0.5o,

Spool Leg length +/- 33mm,

Flange angular misalignment 0.27o

• Onshore as-built tolerances, i.e. The accuracy of the measuring equipment - ?

• Seabed bathymetry (topography) i.e. The accuracy of the measuring equipment - ?

• Structure installation tolerances +/-1.5o on heading, +/-2m on position, Roll and

Pitch? - Function of seabed

• Metrology equipment tolerances – varies depending on equipment used. (Ref 1)

Reference 1: IMCA Guidance on Subsea Metrology IMCA S 019 Feb 2012

Tie-in Spool – Flange Misalignment – A Design Engineers Perspective

Case Study 1

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 22

Allowable flange linear

misalignment for an angular

misalignment of 2.5o

The target linear value was +/-

200mm. The figure illustrates this

wasn’t possible for all combinations

Tie-in Spool – Flange Misalignment – A Design Engineers Perspective

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 23

Establish maximum allowable flange misalignment at 24” flanges

Case Study 2 – 24” OD x 25.4mm WT spools

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 24

Existing pipeline on

a heading of 83.9o

Manifold to be

installed on heading

353.2o

Tie-in Spool – Flange Misalignment – A Design Engineers Perspective

Case Study 2 – Theoretical layout

Tie-in Spool – Flange Misalignment – A Design Engineers Perspective

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 25

Example Subsea

Metrology Drawing

Manifold installed to

within 1.32o

Existing pipeline, 0.9o difference from

previous survey = 848mm @54m

0.82o pitch = 772mm

into seabed

Case Study 2 – As-Installed Layout

Tie-in Spool – Flange Misalignment – A Design Engineers Perspective

26

As-built Spool

Drgs.

Metrology Spool

Drg.

Note magnitudes of

flange misalignment

just from fabrication /

as-built survey

Note Field Welds for

adjusting leg lengths

in X, Y & Z with the

possibility to mitre

butt welds for angular

corrections

Case Study 2 – As-built Spools

Tie-in Spool – Flange Misalignment – A Design Engineers Perspective

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 27

Pipe stress analysis performed to establish maximum allowable

angular and linear flange misalignment

Note how little misalignment is

allowed in the plan view. There

was 0.9o difference between the

two surveys of the existing

pipeline!

Case Study 2 – Maximum Flange Misalignment

Tie-in Spool – Flange Misalignment – A Design Engineers Perspective

Design considerations for Subsea Metrology 28

What Can we Do Better?

• Better communication between all parties

e.g. metrology reports are rarely forwarded to design engineers.

Consequently, the design engineer has a very poor basis for typical

tolerances.

• Understand what magnitude of mitre fabricators can achieve at butt welds.

Induction bends are always manufactured in advance, therefore,

angular misalignment can only be taken out by mitring butt welds or

bending spools. DNV permits mitreing of butt welds up to 3o