speaking with your body-stepladder · approached by jacque-alain miller in his argument for the wap...

2
Speaking with your body-stepladder Presenta t on of the fourth lesson of the seminar “Speaking Lalangue of the Body” by Éric Laurent Elisa Alvarenga On the 4 th of February 2015, in the fourth lesson of his course “Speaking Lalangue of the body”, Eric Laurent explores the relation between the stepladder ( escabeau) and sublimation, that was approached by Jacque-Alain Miller in his argument for the WAP Congress, taking as a starting point the reading of Lacan’s “Joyce the sinthome”. In Miller’s argument, this text is an orientation for deciphering what defines the speaking being, the body spoken and speaking, distinct from the Heideggerian being and also from the contemporary cognitive paradigm. Miller introduces the stepladder as “the pedestal upon which the speaking being elevates himself, steps up to make himself beautiful.” It is what allows him to “elevate himself to the dignity of the Thing”. It is a reference to Seminar VII, The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, where Lacan approaches the problem of sublimation, which consists in accounting for how the autoerotic jouissance of the drive goes in the direction of the desire of the Other. For Miller, the sublimation of the stepladder is located in the intersection with narcissism. A modified narcissism, says Laurent, as it is not only a matter of the image, but of the relation of belief in the idolised body. For Lacan, the body comes first and it is marked by a trauma that Lacan calls trouma, a wordplay on ‘trauma’ and ‘hole’ (trou). In fact, the fundamental of the body is a hole and outside of it there is an image. The speaking being is a being of a void. The belief in the body-stepladder is grounded on the negation of the unconscious: I do not think in order to believe in my being. However, the unconscious is the spoken knowledge which constitutes HOM, who has a body before the mirror stage, starting from the impact of the saying. It is a trauma outside of meaning, which provokes a saying without knowing. In the stepladder there is jouissance of speaking which includes meaning, while the jouissance of the sinthome excludes meaning. Thus, speaking with the body-stepladder is crossing through the

Upload: others

Post on 23-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Speaking with your body-stepladder · approached by Jacque-Alain Miller in his argument for the WAP Congress, taking as a starting point the reading of Lacan’s “Joyce the sinthome”

Speaking with your body-stepladderP r e s e n t at o n o f t h e f o u r t h l e s s o n o f t h e s e m i n a r “ S p e a k i n g L a l a n g u e o f t h e B o d y ” b y É r i c L a u r e n t

E l i sa A lv ar en ga

On the 4th of February 2015, in the fourth lesson of his course “Speaking Lalangue of the body”,

Eric Laurent explores the relation between the stepladder (escabeau) and sublimation, that was

approached by Jacque-Alain Miller in his argument for the WAP Congress, taking as a starting

point the reading of Lacan’s “Joyce the sinthome”. In Miller’s argument, this text is an

orientation for deciphering what defines the speaking being, the body spoken and speaking,

distinct from the Heideggerian being and also from the contemporary cognitive paradigm.

Miller introduces the stepladder as “the pedestal upon which the speaking being elevates

himself, steps up to make himself beautiful.” It is what allows him to “elevate himself to the

dignity of the Thing”. It is a reference to Seminar VII, The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, where

Lacan approaches the problem of sublimation, which consists in accounting for how the

autoerotic jouissance of the drive goes in the direction of the desire of the Other.

For Miller, the sublimation of the stepladder is located in the intersection with narcissism. A

modified narcissism, says Laurent, as it is not only a matter of the image, but of the relation of

belief in the idolised body. For Lacan, the body comes first and it is marked by a trauma that

Lacan calls trouma, a wordplay on ‘trauma’ and ‘hole’ (trou). In fact, the fundamental of the

body is a hole and outside of it there is an image. The speaking being is a being of a void.

The belief in the body-stepladder is grounded on the negation of the unconscious: I do not think

in order to believe in my being. However, the unconscious is the spoken knowledge which

constitutes HOM, who has a body before the mirror stage, starting from the impact of the

saying. It is a trauma outside of meaning, which provokes a saying without knowing. In the

stepladder there is jouissance of speaking which includes meaning, while the jouissance of the

sinthome excludes meaning. Thus, speaking with the body-stepladder is crossing through the

Page 2: Speaking with your body-stepladder · approached by Jacque-Alain Miller in his argument for the WAP Congress, taking as a starting point the reading of Lacan’s “Joyce the sinthome”

defiles of speech sustained by meaning. The speaking being is a being of speech; he is not

sustained by the image or by the impression of the representations, nor is he incarnated in the

brain.

Translated by Noga Wine