special presentation for national academy of science study team
TRANSCRIPT
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 1
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Developed and Produced by
Pipeline Knowledge & Developmenthttp://www.pipelineknowledge.com/
Presented by
Tom Miesner
Introduction to Oil PipelinesNational Academy of Science
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Instructor –Tom Miesner• Principal Pipeline Knowledge & Development
– Pipeline Education and Training
– Strategy and Project Development
– Expert Testimony and Arbitration
– Appraisals and Independent Opinions
– Management and Improvement Consulting
• Extensive pipeline background
• President Conoco Pipe Line Company
• Numerous JV Boards and Committees
• Author
– Oil and Gas Pipelines in NonTechnical Language
– The Role of Pipelines and Research in the U. S.
– A Practical Guide to US Natural Gas Pipeline Economics
– The Interstate Natural Gas Transmission System: Scale, Physical Complexity,and Business Model
– Pipeline Engineering for McGraw Hill’s Transportation Engineering Handbook
• Currently writing The Final Mile, Natural Gas Distribution Pipelines inNonTechnical Language
2
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Copyright and Disclaimer
3
The materials contained in this presentation are copyright Pipeline Knowledge &Development 2012. All rights are reserved. No part of this presentation may bereproduced, distributed, or stored in any form or by an means without prior writtenpermission from Pipeline Knowledge & Development.
Some of the images have been supplied by others . Other information has beentaken from literature or the internet in which case any copyright remains with thoseorganizations or individuals.
The information contained in these materials was secured from sources believed tobe reliable. However, Tom Miesner, Miesner, LLC, and Pipeline Knowledge &Development;1. Make no warranty or representation, expressed or implied regarding the accuracy, completeness,
reliability, or usefulness of the information contained in this presentation2. Assume no liability with respect to the use of the materials contained in these presentations3. Are not responsible for damages resulting from use of the information in these presentations.
For information or to receive permission to copy or reproduce, contact Tom Miesner,[email protected] or +1-281-579-8877
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Table of Contents
1) Oil Pipelines2) Fluid Properties3) Pipeline Construction4) Equipment and Components
5) Pipeline Operations
6) Pipeline Maintenance
4
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 2
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pipeline Types
• Fluids Transported
– Natural gas
– Crude oil
– Refined products
– LPG and chemicals
– Specialty
• Function
– Gathering
– Transmission, main or trunk line
– Distribution
5 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pipeline Types
• Fluids Transported
– Natural gas
– Crude oil
– Refined products
– LPG and chemicals
– Specialty
• Function
– Gathering
– Transmission, main or trunk line
– Distribution
6
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pipeline Value Chain
Gas
plant
Crude oil trunk or main line
Gathering stations
Oil and gasGathering lines
Oil products lineProductsterminals
Industrial users
Local distribution
company lines
Underground storage
Underground
& steel storage
Refining center
LPGdistribution
Natural gas transmission or main line
Copyright PennWell Publishing 2006
7 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
May replace some of the following series of slides withslides requested from Enbridge showing the actual
assets.
8
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 3
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Crude Oil Mainline Pump Station
9
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Refinery Tank Farm
10
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Refinery
11 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pump station
Flow direction
Lower pressure due togravity
Higher pressure due togravity
Loss ofpressure dueto friction
Pump stationor terminal
Pressure at a point = Pressure at origin –Friction loss + elevation change
Pressure losses due to friction, and/or elevationchanges, require pumping or compression.
Pipeline Hydraulics –The Basics
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 4
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Fluid Properties
• Density –mass/volume– Specific gravity (density relative to water)
– API gravity for liquids
• Viscosity –internal resistance to flow– Absolute
– Kinematic
• Vapor pressure –pressure above which liquidsbecome gases
• Chemistry– Hydrocarbon molecules– Sulphur (sour vs. sweet)– Other constituents
13 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
API Gravity - Liquids
- 131.5API Gravity = 141.5Specific Gravity
API Gravity = 141.5.9
- 131.5 = 25.70 API
• The higher the API gravity the lighter the material• Water has an API gravity of 100
• API gravity is a density measurement used in thepetroleum industry and has no other specialmeaning
14
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Viscosity Vs Temperature
15
Courtesy Delrio S.A.
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pressure –PSI vs. Feet
16
WaterSg = 1
43.3 psi
GasolineSg = 0.6929.9 psi
Diesel FuelSg = .8436.4 psi
10
0F
t.
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 5
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
The Important Concepts
• Resistance to flow causes friction
• Faster flow produces more friction
• Size and pattern of the opening determine pressureloss and therefore velocity
• As flow starts to stop the pressures in the systemchange
• Starting or stopping suddenly causes pressure surges(water hammer)
• Changing one variable changes the others
17 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Basic Flow Principles
• Pressure differentials cause fluids to flow
• As fluids move along they must overcome friction– From the pipe wall
– From the fluid’s internal resistance to flow
• Going up hill uses pressure as pressure battlesgravity
• Going down hill increases pressure as gravityhelps pull the material down the hill.
• In most cases friction loss is significantly largerthan elevation loss
18
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pump station
Flow direction
Lower pressure due togravity
Higher pressure due togravity
Loss ofpressure dueto friction
Pump stationor terminal
Pressure at a point = Pressure at origin –Friction loss + elevation change
Pressure losses due to friction, and/or elevationchanges, require pumping or compression.
Pipeline Hydraulics –The Basics
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Flow direction
Hydraulic Gradient and Profile
Feet
of
head
Miles
Pre
ssure
inth
elin
e
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 6
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Profile and Gradient Screen
Pressure in the line
Pressure in the line
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pipeline Construction Spread
22
Courtesy Vanderpool Pipeline Engineers Inc.
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Welder Testing and Qualification
23 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Stripping Top Soil
Courtesy U. S. Pipeline, Inc.; photo by Adam Aronson
24
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 7
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Stringing 3
Photo by Tom Miesner
25 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Ditching 2
Photo by Tom Miesner
26
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Internal Alignment Clamps 1
Photo by Tom Miesner
27 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Internal Alignment Clamps 2
Photo by Tom Miesner
28
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 8
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Welding
Photo by Tom Miesner
29 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Stringer Bead
Photo by Tom Miesner
30
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Grinding to Clean the Weld
Photo by Tom Miesner
31 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Weld Bead
32
Prior to weld
Post Weld
Cap bead
Root or stringer bead
Filler beads
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 9
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Finished Weld
Photo by Tom Miesner
33 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Girth Weld Testing with Ultrasonics
34
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Welded Pipe Ready for X-Ray
35
Photo by Tom Miesner
MLLC 1
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Developed Films Ready for Reading
36
Photo by Tom Miesner
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 10
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Girth Weld –Ready for Coating
Photo by Tom Miesner
37 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Coated Girth Weld
Photo by Tom Miesner
38
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Lowering
Courtesy U. S. Pipeline, Inc.; photo by Adam Aronson
39 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Testing Coating Anomalies –Jeeping
Photo by Tom Miesner
40
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 11
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Field Bending
Courtesy U. S. Pipeline, Inc.; photo by Adam Aronson
41 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Directional Drill –Going In
Photo by Tom Miesner
42
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Directional Drill –Changing Drill Pipe
Photo by Tom Miesner
43 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Direction Drill –The Other End
Photo by Tom Miesner
44
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 12
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Directional Drill –Hole Reamer
Photo by Tom Miesner
45 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Ready to Pull the Pipe
Photo by Tom Miesner
46
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Cradling As It Goes
Photo by Tom Miesner
47 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
The Other End
Photo by Tom Miesner
48
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 13
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Bored Crossing
49
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Hydrotesting
Photo by Tom Miesner
50
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Test Equipment
Photo by Tom Miesner
51 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Off Test –Relieving Pressure
Photo by Tom Miesner
52
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 14
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Tieing In
Courtesy U. S. Pipeline, Inc.; photo by Adam Aronson
53 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Station Site
54
Used with permission
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Prefabbing
55
Used with permission
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Ready to be Assembled
56
Used with permission
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 15
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Lowering the Pump Skid
57
Used with permission
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Setting the Pump Skid
58
Used with permission
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pump Piping Layout
59
Used with permission
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Hydrotesting Station Piping
60
Used with permission
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 16
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Finished Pump Station
61
Used with permission
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Control Building
62
Used with permission
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Switch Gear
63
Used with permission
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Electrical Terminations
64
Used with permission
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 17
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Testing and Checkout
65
Used with permission
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Startup and Trouble Shooting
66
Used with permission
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Line Pipe
• Manufacturing methods– Electric resistance welded (ERW)
– Seamless
– Submerged arc welded (DSAW)
– Gas arc welded
– Spiral wound
• Properties– Metallurgy
– Strength
– Ductility
• API 5L SPECIFICATION FOR LINE PIPE
67
Common Pipe Grades and Their Specified
Minimum Yield Strength
GradeSMYS(psi)
X42 42,000
X-46 46,000
X52 52,000
X56 56,000
X60 60,000
X65 65,000
X70 70,000
X80 80,000
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
DSAW Pipe
Weld Seam
Photo by Tom Miesner
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 18
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
DSAW Weld
69
Source NTSB
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
ERW Pipe
70
Weld Seam
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Spiral Wound Pipe
Photo by Tom Miesner
Weld Seam
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pipe Labeling
72
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 19
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Coatings
• Fusion Bond Epoxy (FBE)
• Coal Tar Enamel (TGF 3)
• Multi layer
• Plastic
• Tapes
• Shrink sleeves
• Two part cold epoxy
• Abrasion Resistant Overcoatings (ARO)
• Concrete coating
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Fittings and Flanges
Photo by Tom Miesner
-20 0F to 100 0F
AnsiRating
(#)
WorkingPressure (psi)
TestPressure
(psi)
150 285 450
300 740 1125
400 990 1500
600 1480 2225
900 2220 3350
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Valves
•Types
–Gate
–Ball
–Plug
–Check
–Globe
•Functions
–Block orisloate
–Control
–Relief
• Supplier
–M & J
–Cameron
–GeneralTwin Seal
–Valvitalia
–PetrolValves
–DynaSeal
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Multistage Horizontal Split Case
Courtesy Sulzer Pump
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 20
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Electric Motors
77
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Operations vs. Maintenance
• Operations cause the pipeline to function such that itperforms its intended purpose.
• Maintenance keeps the pipeline in operating conditionat its current capacity.
• Field operations are those conducted along or nearthe pipeline’s route
• Control room operations are conducted at limitednumbers of locations remote from the pipeline
• Some maintenance activities such as planning areconducted remote from the pipeline but mostmaintenance activities are conducted along the route
• Operations and maintenance are often performed bythe same people
78
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Operating Tasks
• Line Control
– Starting and stopping the entire line
– Changing flow rates
– Starting, stopping or diverting flow
– Optimizing line operations
• Measurement and Testing
– Flows and quantities
– Quality
• Indirect Operating Tasks
– Healthy, Safety, and Environmental
– Education of and relations with the various publics
– Emergency response preparation and training
79© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Public Relations
• Landowners along the ROW
• Local officials
– Planning commission
– Emergency response
– County commission
• Excavators
– Contractors
– Other underground utilities
• Environmental and other special interest groups
80
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 21
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
HSE and Response
• Health, safety, and environmental
– Conducting safety training
– Monitoring discharge levels
– Completing discharge reports
• Emergency response
– Preparing response plans
– Training
•Employees
•Contractors
•Local officials
– Conducting drills
– Responding to emergencies
81© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Typical Pipeline Control Room 2/2
82
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Control Room Operations
Nominations Dispatching Controlling ReportingScheduling
Functions
Receipts Delivery
Pipeline
Storage
Flow
83 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Direction of Flow
PremiumGasoline
MidgradeGasoline
RegularGasoline
End ofcycle
Typical Refined Products Cycle
DieselJetFuelDiesel
MidgradeGasoline
RegularGasoline
Beginningof cycle
Lightsweet
LighthighSulfur
HeavyhighSulfur
Lightsweet
Lighthighsulfur
Heavyhighsulfur
Butane
Complex Crude Oil Cycle
Batching Sequence
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 22
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Station Schematic 1
85
Miesner Station
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
At what pressure will a pipe leak?
•It depends on…– Wall thickness– Diameter
– Steel strength
Burst Pressure = 2t X USD
t = Wall thicknessUS = Ultimate strengthD = Average diameter
MAOP = 2t X SMYS X SFD
86
SMYS = Specified Minimum Yield Strength
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Stress Strain Curve
Stress –Amount offorceStrain –Length ofchange1 - Ultimate Strength2 - Yield Strength3 - Rupture4 - Strain hardening
region5 - Necking region
87 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
The Reinforcing Effect
Pipe Wall 1
Pipe Wall 2
Pipe wall 2 will rupture at lower pressure thanpipe wall 1 because of the reinforcing effect.
How to resolve the geometry of wall 3.
88
Pipe Wall 3
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 23
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Internal Microbial Induced Corrosion
Source: National Transportation Safety Board
89 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Corrosion
• Galvanic– External
– Internal
• AC –induced current from foreign sources
• Microbial induced or assisted corrosion (MIC, MAC)– Anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacteria –sporovibrio
desulfuricans
– Aerobic sulfate-oxidizing –thiobaccilus thioxidans
– Gallionella and iron bacteria
• Acid assisted– Carbonic
– Sulfuric
• Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC)
90
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Corrosion Mitigation
• External –Cathodic Protection– Coating
•Fusion bond
•Coal tar
•Extruded plastic
•Tape
•Shrink Sleeves
– Galvanic– Impressed current
• Internal– Maintenance pigging– Corrosion inhibiting chemicals
• Stress Corrosion Cracking - coating
• AC induced –AC mitigation with cathodic decoupler
91 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Preventing Internal Corrosion
•Effective design and construction
–Limit accumulation of water and other liquids
–Provide means to remove contaminants
•Maintenance Pigging
•Chemical cleaning
•Corrosion inhibitors
92
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 24
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Low flow velocities, low spots in the line, orsteep slopes can allow debris to collectblocking flow and shielding microbes fromcorrosion inhibitors.
Internal Corrosion Under Deposits
93 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pipeline Cleaning
•Techniques– Mechanical –cleaning pigs– Chemical
– Combination
•Why clean?– Understand the problem or potential problem –remove and
analyze deposits– Clean wall to improve inhibitor effectiveness– Remove deposits and build up to improve flow– Remove nutrients to limit bacterial growth
– Prevent “under deposit”corrosion
94
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Blowing Down a Gas Pig Launcher
95
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Opening the Trap
96
Photo by Tom Miesner
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 25
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Carrying the Pig
97
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Loading Close Up
98
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Getting Ready to Seat the Pig
99
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Seating the Pig
100
Photo by Tom Miesner
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 26
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Ready to Close the Trap
101
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
On the Other End
102
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Wear on the Disc
103 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Brush Pig Ready to Launch
104
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 27
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Brush Pig Following a Run
105 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Quite a Bit of Crap
106
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Shoveling it in the Barrel for Removal
107 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Corrosion Inhibiters
•Types– Control bacteria –treat with biocides
– Neutralize dissolved oxygen
– Apply a protective coating on the pipe ID
•Manufactured by many companies
•Many “trade secrets”and still somewhat of anart
•Must understand the corrosion mechanism toprescribe the “right”inhibitor
•Proper application is critical
108
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 28
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Finding Potential Problems
•Internal Inspection Devices•Intrusive Monitoring•Non-intrusive Monitoring•Hydrostatic Testing•Electrical Surveys•Direct Assessment•Modeling
109 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Anomaly In-Line Inspections
110
Extracted June 5, 2011 from http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/iim/perfmeasures.htm
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Smart Pigs
• Purpose
–Caliper or Geometry or Deformation
–Metal Loss Surveys
–Crack Detection
–Inertial Navigation Systems• Technologies
–Deflection
–Magnetic Flux
–Ultrasonic
–Combinations
111 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Geometry Inspection
• Provides information regarding geometrical features– Dents
– Wrinkles– Buckles– Ovality– Valves
– Tees– Girth Welds– Wall Thickness Changes
• Also can provide data about such operating conditions asspeed and temperature.
• Some geometry tools have XYZ mapping to produce threedimensional picture of the pipeline geography
112
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 29
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Caliper/Geometry Tool
113 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Magnetic Flux Leakage Tool
• Tool generates a magnetic flux in the pipe wall• Sensor heads located on the tool measure the amount
and direction of magnetic flux leaking from the pipe wall• More flux leaking from one area versus the surrounding
pipe indicates an anomaly• Flux leakage is a vector (has direction) so each sensor
heads contain three sensors to measure axial, radial,and circumferential components of the field
• This information is recorded and analyzed to understandthe location and geometry of anomalies
• Widely used to find corrosion wall loss
114
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
MFL Tools for Metal Loss
115 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Metal Loss Classifications
116
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CIR
CU
MF
ER
EN
TIA
LG
RO
OV
E
AXIAL SLOTTING
AXIAL GROOVING
Length x (t)
Wid
thx
(t)
PITTING
GENERAL
PIN-HOLE
t = wall thicknessor 10mm,
whichever isgreater
(10mm = 0.3937”)
METAL LOSSDEFINITIONS
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 30
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Ultrasonic Tool
• Transducers located around the tool emit high frequencysound pulses perpendicular to the pipe wall
• The sound pulses reflect from (bounce off) any boundarylayer they encounter –in this case the inner and outerpipe walls
• These reflections or echoes are recorded by receiversmounted on the tool
• Algorithms analyze the time interval between the arrivalof reflected echoes from inner surface and outer surfaceto calculate the wall thickness
• Placing more transmitters and receivers increase thetools ability to locate various anomalies
117 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development118
Three calculation methods for determining the remainingstrength of a corrosion defect:
•ASME B31G•Modified B31G (0.85-dL method)•Effective Area
Kiefner & Associates Pipe Assessment (KAPA), andRSTRENG are two tools to perform these calculations andto determine failure and safe operating pressures
KAPA uses “log-secant”formula, also known as the “NG-18”equation for crack-like effects
Evaluation Techniques
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development 119
COMPLETE SHADED BLOCKS IN THIS SECTION
N W
Pipe O.D. inches Total Len. inches
W.T. inches Eff. Len. inches Fail Pressure, psi Fail Pressure, psi Fail Pressure, psi
SMYS psi Start Len. inches Factor of Safety Factor of Safety Factor of Safety
MAOP psi Stop Len. inches Safe Op. Pressure Safe Op. Pressure Safe Op. Pressure
Des. Fact. Max. Depth inches
Stress Level dmax/t
Max. Des. Pres. psi Eff. Area Sq. In.
1304.8 1251.4850
0.425
KAPA 2001-2 DEFECT EVALUATION
11-Jun-07
0.72
39.8%
1537.7
PIPELINE DATA
12.750
0.389
35000 2.74
1675.3
0.266
0.684
0.00
3.00
ASME B31G
1738.1
2.04
METHOD 2
Modified B31G
2.13
METHOD 3
Defect I.D. No.:
Pipe Joint No. :
Date of Eval:
1812.2
METHOD 1
EFFECTIVE AREA
2326.8
CALCULATED PARAMETERS
3.50
3.00
Line Name:
Segment Name:
Crane to McCamey
Crane to McCamey 12" Pipeline
21457.5 Defect Location: MP 0
Eval. By:
Description: Validation of smart pig results
Dawn Halferty
Other
Sta.0
deg. 0 deg.
0
GPS 0
DEFECT PROFILE
079
127
266
157191
600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Defect Length, inches
Wall
Th
ickn
ess,
mil
s
IMPORTANT NOTICE! When burst (fail) pressure is less than MOP of pipe, ASME B31.4,
451.7 shall be used to calculate safe operating pressure. (Not calculated by this program!) If
burst (fail) pressure is greater than MOP of pipe, Factor of Safety must always be greater than
1.39 as calculated by the appropriate Method above.
Method 1: No notation indicates defect
may be acceptable using this method.
Method 2: No notation indicates defect
may be acceptable using this method.
Method 3: No notation indicates defect
may be acceptable using this method.
Summary Screen
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Pressure Reduction Warning
120
•If Factor of Safety drops below 1.39 for any ofthe methods, a warning is issued
Pipe O.D. inches Total Len. inches
W.T. inches Eff. Len. inches Fail Pressure, psi Fail Pressure, psi Fail Pressure, psi
SMYS psi Start Len. inches Factor of Safety Factor of Safety Factor of Safety
MAOP psi Stop Len. inches Safe Op. Pressure Safe Op. Pressure Safe Op. Pressure
Des. Fact. Max. Depth inches
Stress Level dmax/t
Max. Des. Pres. psi Eff. Area Sq. In.
846.0 945.2
Lower Operating Pressure!
850
1.103
0.72
39.8%
1537.7
PIPELINE DATA
12.750
0.389
35000 1.95
1190.6
0.300
0.771
0.50
5.50
ASME B31G
1312.8
1.54
METHOD 2
Modified B31G
1.38
METHOD 3
1175.0
METHOD 1
EFFECTIVE AREA
1653.6
CALCULATED PARAMETERS
9.50
5.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE! When burst (fail) pressure is less than MOP of pipe, ASME B31.4,
451.7 shall be used to calculate safe operating pressure. (Not calculated by this program!) If
burst (fail) pressure is greater than MOP of pipe, Factor of Safety must always be greater than
1.39 as calculated by the appropriate Method above.
Method 1: No notation indicates defectmay be acceptable using this method.
Method 2: No notation indicates defectmay be acceptable using this method.
Method 3: No notation indicates defect
may be acceptable using this method.
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 31
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Tool Calibration
121
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Other Wall Measurement Techniques
•Intrusive– Corrosion coupons– Electrical resistance probes
•Non-intrusive– Ultrasonic– Acoustic– Fiber optic
– Field signature method
122
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Corrosion Coupons
• A small piece of metal is inserted into and left in the line
• After some time it is withdrawn, examined, and weighed
• Corrosion rates and mechanisms for the line are inferredfrom the effects on the coupon
• Advantages– widely used
– well known
– Relatively inexpensive
• Disadvantages– Intrusive –must cut a hole in the line
– Surrogate –not the actual line
– Accessibility –difficult to place in many desired locations
–Monitoring –can not be monitored in real time
123 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Corrision Coupon Tap
Courtesy CenterPoint Energy
124
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 32
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Preparing to Weld the Fitting
125
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
30-Inch Stopple Fitting
126
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Stopple Cutter Heads
127
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Stopple Plug
128
Photo by Tom Miesner
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 33
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Bypass Connection
129
Photo by Tom Miesner
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Piggable Valves
130
Courtesy LineStar Services
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Sealing Module
131
Courtesy LineStar Services
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Tool Communications vs Stopple Fitting
132
Courtesy LineStar Services
Photo by Tom Miesner Photo by Tom Miesner
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 34
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Cutting Out the Old Pipe
Photo by Tom Miesner
133 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Lining Up the New Pipe
Photo by Tom Miesner
134
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Welding In the New Pipe
Photo by Tom Miesner
135 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Longitudinal weld Circumferential weld
Installing a Steel Sleeve
136
Special Presentation for National Academy of Science Study Team
For permission to copy or distribute contact [email protected] 35
© 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development
Wrapping a Composite Sleeve
Courtesy Aqua Wrap
137 © 2012 Pipeline Knowledge & Development 138