special theory of relativity ii

Upload: tabooga

Post on 04-Jun-2018

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    1/22

    Lecture 04

    Special Theory of

    Relativity II

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    2/22

    Maxwells Equations

    Maxwells equations DO NOT have the sameform under a Galilean transformation.

    In Maxwells theory the speed of light, in termsof the permeability and permittivity of free

    space, was given by

    Thus the velocity of light between movingsystems must be a constant.

    1

    v = c = 1 / 00

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    3/22

    Light Speed Contradiction

    Based on Maxwells theory,

    But classical mechanics tells us that

    Which one is correct?

    c = c '

    c = c '+ v

    2

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    4/22

    A Preferred Reference System

    Ether was proposed as an absolute referencesystem in which the speed of light was this

    constant and from which other measurementscould be made.

    The Michelson-Morley experiment was anattempt to show the existence of ether.

    Earth

    Ether

    v

    v 10-4c

    3

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    5/22

    The Michelson Interferometer

    AC is parallel to the motionof the Earth.

    Light from source S is splitby mirror A

    and travels

    to mirrors Cand D in mutually

    perpendiculardirections.

    After reflection the beamsrecombine at A slightly outof phase as viewed by

    telescope E.

    4

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    6/22

    Interferometer Fringe Pattern

    Beam-splitter

    Inputbeam

    Mirror

    Mirror

    z

    x

    Earth

    Drift

    5

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    7/22

    Wave

    6

    (x,t) =Asin(kxt+ 0)

    whereAis amplitude,

    =kx t+ 0 is phase, and 0 is the initial phase,

    kis wave number: k=2

    , where is wave length,

    is angular velocity: = 2T

    , where Tis period,

    f =1

    Tis frequency, the phase speed v =f =

    T=

    k.

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    8/22

    Wave Interference

    7

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    9/22

    Wave Interference

    8

    Sources S1 and S2 are coherent wave sources

    Constructive Interferences: r2 r

    1= m (m = 0,1,2,3,...)

    Destructive Interferences: r2 r

    1= (m + 0.5) (m = 0,1,2,3,...)

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    10/22

    Wave Interference

    9

    Sources S1 and S2 are coherent wave sources

    Constructive Interferences: = 2m (m = 0,1,2,3,...)

    Destructive Interferences: = (2m +1) (m = 0,1,2,3,...)

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    11/22

    Wave Interference: Double-Slit

    10

    At the center, = 0

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    12/22

    Interferometer Fringe Pattern

    Beam-splitter

    Inputbeam

    Mirror

    Mirror

    z

    x

    Earth

    Drift

    The fringe pattern should shift if

    the apparatus is rotated by 90.

    11

    At the center, = t = t2f

    n=

    '

    2=

    (

    t'

    t)f

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    13/22

    Galilean Velocity Transformation

    P

    v

    vP =

    v 'P+

    v

    12

    vP

    v

    v 'P

    vP

    vv 'P

    vP

    v

    v 'P

    v '

    P = v

    p v

    v 'P = v

    p+ v

    v 'P = v

    P

    2 v

    2

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    14/22

    The Analysis

    Time t1 from A to C and back:

    Assuming the Galilean Transformation

    13

    v

    l1

    l2

    AC

    D

    Parallel and

    anti-parallelpropagation

    Time t2from A to D and back:

    Perpendicular

    propagation

    t2 =

    2l2

    c2v

    2

    =

    2l2

    c

    1

    1v2/ c

    2

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    15/22

    The Analysis

    So that the change in time is:

    Assuming the Galilean Transformation

    14

    t' = t'2 t'

    1 =

    2

    c

    l2

    1 v2 / c2 l1

    1 v2 / c2

    Upon rotating the apparatus, the optical path lengths 1and 2are interchanged producing a different change in

    time: (note the change in denominators)

    t = t2 t

    1 =

    2

    c

    l2

    1 v2 / c2 l11 v2 / c2

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    16/22

    The Analysis

    and upon a binomial expansion, assumingv

    /c

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    17/22

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    18/22

    Michelson-Morley Experiment

    17

    Michelson and Morley's results

    from A. A. Michelson, Studies in

    Optics

    Interference fringes showed nochangeas the interferometer

    was rotated.

    The Michelson interferometer

    shouldve revealed a fringe shift as

    it was rotated with respect to the

    ether velocity. MM expected 0.4periods of shift (11 m for l1and l2) and

    could resolve 0.005 periods.

    They saw none!Their apparatus

    Nobel Prize in 1907

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    19/22

    In several repeats andrefinements with

    assistance fromEdward Morley, he

    always saw a null

    result.

    He concluded that thehypothesis of the

    stationary ether must

    be incorrect.

    Thus, ether seemsnot to exist!

    Michelsons Conclusion

    Edward Morley

    (1838-1923)

    Albert Michelson

    (1852-1931)

    18

    Nobel Prize in 1907: One of the most famous failed expt.

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    20/22

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    21/22

    The Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction

    Another hypothesis proposedindependently by both H. A. Lorentzand G. F. FitzGerald suggested thatthe length in the direction of the

    motion was contracted by a factorof

    Therefore

    20

    t =t'=

    2

    c

    l2

    1 v2 / c2

    l1

    1 v2 / c2

    George F. FitzGerald

    (1851-1901)

    Hendrik A. Lorentz

    (1853-1928)

    This, however, was an ad hoc assumption that could not be

    experimentally tested.

  • 8/13/2019 Special Theory of Relativity II

    22/22

    Assignments

    Reading: Ch. 2.3, 2.4.

    21