spectrum co-existence of ieee 802.11b and 802.16a networks using the cscc etiquette protocol

35
1 Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol Coexistence in heterogeneous networks Discuss the interference issue Design a coordination protocol to improve the performance Pilot channel Power control mechanism

Upload: rinah-roth

Post on 02-Jan-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol. Coexistence in heterogeneous networks Discuss the interference issue Design a coordination protocol to improve the performance Pilot channel Power control mechanism. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

1

Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etique

tte Protocol

Coexistence in heterogeneous networks Discuss the interference issue Design a coordination protocol to improve the

performance Pilot channel Power control mechanism

Page 2: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

2

Coexistence Study in the 2500-2690 MHz Band between WiMAX

and WCDMA Systems

Zheng Ruiming, Zhang Xin, Li Xi, Hai Yang, Yang Dacheng

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications

IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2008. VTC2008

Presenter: Han-Tien Chang

Page 3: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

3

Outline

Introduction Interference Environment Analysis Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters Simulation Results and Analysis Mitigation Techniques Conclusion Comments

Page 4: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

4

Introduction

The bandwidth from 2500 to 2690 MHz is assigned to IMT-2000 systems as the extension band, w

hich is identified by the WRC-2000. 3G cellular systems (ex: WCDMA) in Europe

WiMAX (802.16e) as a member in IMT-2000 by WRC-07 makes it permitted to use 3G systems’ bandwidth, which al

so includes 2500 to 2690 MHz. Analysis of coexistence issue between WiMAX and

WCDMA systems in 2500 to 2690 MHz band is of great importance

Page 5: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

5

Introduction (cont’d) Related discussions and results on coexistence issue

[2] coexistence of FDD and TDD modes in UMTS [3] coexistence of TD-SCDMA and WCDMA systems [4] coexistence involving between two LTE systems [5] coexistence of mobile WiMAX and GSM system [6] interference analysis of 802.16d and WCDMA system [7][8] techniques to mitigate the interference ,and hence to impro

ve coexistence between TDD and FDD networks

[2] Impact of FDD/TDD coexistence on overall UMTS system performance [3] Theoretical and Simulation Investigation on Coexistence between TD-SCDMA and WCDMA system [4] Coexistence Analysis Involving 3GPP Long Term Evolution [5] Co-Existence Study of Mobile WiMAX and GSM [6] Interference Analysis between Macro WCDMA and Macro WIMAX Coexisted in Adjacent Frequency Band [7] ITU-R M.2030, [8] ITU-R M.2045

Page 6: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

6

Introduction (cont’d)

The analysis on several interference paths with WiMAX and WCDMA system

Statistic Monte-Carlo simulation methods, assumptions and parameters in details.

Simulation from three different respects Separation distances between two systems Uplink power control mechanism of WiMAX system Frequency reuse schemes

Page 7: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

7

Interference Environment Analysis

The coexistence interference of mobile WiMAX (802.16e) and WCDNA systems in macro cellular network WiMAX’s channel bandwidth: 10 MHz WCDMA’s channel bandwidth: 5 MHz

Frequency Allocation and Interference Scenarios Interference between WiMAX and WCDMA uplink (UL) as

well as WiMAX and WCDMA downlink (DL)

Page 8: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

8

Interference Environment Analysis (cont’d)

The possible interference path Interference between WiMAX system and WCDM

A system uplink (MSBS) 1. Interference to WCDMA BS caused by WiMAX BS 2. Interference to WCDMA BS caused by WiMAX MS 3. Interference to WiMAX BS caused by WCDMA MS 4. Interference to WiMAX MS caused by WCDMA MS

Page 9: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

9

Interference Environment Analysis (cont’d)

Interference between WiMAX system and WCDMA system downlink (BSMS) 1. Interference to WCDMA MS caused by WiMAX BS 2. Interference to WCDMA MS caused by WiMAX MS 3. Interference to WiMAX BS caused by WCDMA BS 4. Interference to WiMAX MS caused by WCDMA BS

Concentrate on several important interference scenarios in section IV

Page 10: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

10

Interference Environment Analysis (cont’d)

Inter-system Interference Adjacent Channel Interference (ACI)

Two main sources: one is out-of-band emission and the other one is spurious emission

The ACI can lead to significant reduction in its neighbor system capacity.

Adjacent Channel Interference Power Ratio (ACIR) which is defined as the ratio of the total power transmit

ted from a source to the total interference power affecting a victim receiver

Page 11: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

11

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Procedure Certain number of users randomly distributed in service

area after the deployment of system layout and setting simulation

Calculate each link’s path-loss, including antenna gain and shadow fading

Each MS chooses its BS based on the strongest signal it receives and then keeps the serving BS unchanged

The final statistics may be collected after SINR calculation and no more than 150-step power control iterations

Page 12: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

12

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

Network Deployment and Frequency Reuse Service area deploy in simulation

a layout of 2-tier 19 hexagonal cells with 3 identical sectors in each cell

WiMAX Frequency reuse schemes 1*3*1: each cell uses the same 10 MHz 1*3*3: each sector only occupies 10/3 MHz (Cell × Sector × Frequency Reuse Factor)

In WCDMA system, all the 5 MHz bandwidth is deployed in the whole service area.

Page 13: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

13

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

Page 14: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

14

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

Simulation Assumptions and Parameters

Page 15: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

15

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

Page 16: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

16

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

Propagation Models BS-to-MS propagation model [11][12]

Δhb: the difference between the base station antenna height and the average building height (6m)

R: the distance between BS and MS in kilometer f: the frequency (2600 MHz)

Page 17: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

17

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

d: the distance in meters between the BS and MS

BS-to-BS propagation model The Dual-Slope LOS propagation model is used in this tr

ansmitting environment with the breakpoint (dbreak) as the threshold to determine the appropriate model

htx and hrx are the heights over the reflecting surface of the transmitter and the receiver. λ is the wavelength.

Page 18: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

18

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

Where d is distance in meters

Minimum Coupling Loss (MCL) Defined as the minimum distance loss including antenna gain

measured between antenna connectors The MCL values of base station to base station and to mobile

station are 50dB and 70dB

Page 19: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

19

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

The received power in downlink or uplink (BS-BS) where PTx and PRx are the transmitted and received sig

nal power. GTx and GRx present the transmitted and received ante

nna gain.

Page 20: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

20

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

Interference Models and Power Control Mechanism WCDMA system interference models

The SINR calculation in uplink

PRx: received power, N0: thermal noise.

Iown : the interference generated by other users that are connected to the same BS

β represents an interference reduction factor due to the use of Multi User Detection (MUD) in uplink

Page 21: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

21

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

Iother means the interference from other cells of WCDMA system, and also includes the interference coming from the WiMAX system, which is decreased by ACIR (dB).

The SINR calculation in downlink

α is the orthogonal factor, which takes into account the fact that the downlink is not perfectly orthogonal due to multipath propagation. In this simulation, α = 0.4

Page 22: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

22

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

WiMAX system interference model WiMAX system adopts Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Acces

s (OFDMA) technology

IC,i denotes the co-channel interference received from the ith transmitter

NC represents the number of co-channel interfering transmissions IA,i is the adjacent channel interference received from the jth transmitte

r which reduced by ACIR (dB) NA is the number of adjacent channel interfering transmissions.

Page 23: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

23

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

Interference factor When WCDMA system is interfered by WiMAX system TDD system’s interference to certain direction of FDD syste

m exists for some periods other than the whole time. The interference from TDD should multiply k, the interferen

ce factor and assumes uplink/downlink ratio as ½. Interference (WiMAX BSWCDMA BS & MS)

k is 0.67 Interference (WiMAX MSWCDMA BS and MS)

k is 0.33

Page 24: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

24

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

Performance Evaluation Criteria WCDMA performance evaluation criteria

Nsingle is defined as the number of users per sector in single system case (i.e. the case without interfering system)

In multi-system case, when considering additional interference from WiMAX system, Nmulti users per sector is distributed in WCDMA system.

Page 25: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

25

Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Parameters (cont’d)

WiMAX performance evaluation criteria The modulation efficiency (ME) of each link in WiMAX system

could be acquired from physical layer performance table The average modulation efficiency is

ME is modulation efficiency of the ith link, N is the number of total links.

The loss in the modulation efficiency is calculated by

Page 26: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

26

Simulation Results and Analysis

Different offsets between two systems evaluate the impacts on coexistence caused by different offsets

between the two systems WCDMA MS interfering with WiMAX BS

Page 27: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

27

Simulation Results and Analysis (cont’d)

As the distance between the two systems increasing More users in WCDMA cell edge are likely to locate near

WiMAX base station These users will transmit at higher power in order to guar

antee their link qualities in WCDMA system, Results in sever interference to WiMAX BSs and decrea

se of WiMAX uplink modulation efficiency.

Page 28: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

28

Simulation Results and Analysis (cont’d)

Uplink power control mechanism used in WiMAX system an important technology in reducing the interference to oth

er cells or systems The initial transmitted power for a user is the maximum MS

transmit power. Using the current SINR (SINRcurrent) as index to lookup the p

hysical layer performance table, we choose the lower SINR value close to the current one as the target SINR.

Page 29: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

29

Simulation Results and Analysis (cont’d)

Page 30: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

30

Simulation Results and Analysis (cont’d)

The data show that using power control mechanism may adjust transmitted power of WiMAX users, as well as effectively reduce their interference to WCDMA systems.

Page 31: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

31

Simulation Results and Analysis (cont’d)

Two frequency reuse schemes Frequency reuse is implemented to assure edge-user

connection quality and throughput Two interference scenarios

From WiMAX MS to WCDMA BS From WCDMA BS to WiMAX BS.

The frequency reuse mechanism may significantly reduce the transmitted power for users at cell edge and the interference to WCDMA system

Page 32: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

32

Simulation Results and Analysis (cont’d)

Page 33: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

33

Mitigation Techniques

Reduce the interference between TDD and FDD systems operating on adjacent frequencies antenna separation improving the RF equipment performance using proper guard-bands between two systems adopting channel filter for the base station to improve

the ACLR (adjacent channel leakage ratio) and ACS (adjacent channel selectivity) performance.

Page 34: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

34

Conclusion

Detailed interference environment analysis including several interference scenarios, network deployme

nt, propagation models and interference models

Typical interference scenarios are simulated and evaluated from three different respects

Page 35: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol

35

Comments

Learn about much interference knowledge about WiMAX with WCDMA system

Lack of detail simulation procedure If using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol in WiNA

X and WCDMA system