spin asymmetries of the nucleon experiment - beta analysis ...spin asymmetries of the nucleon...

42
Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment BETA Analysis Update Whitney R. Armstrong The SANE Collaboration Temple University January 14, 2012 W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 1 / 36

Upload: others

Post on 09-May-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon ExperimentBETA Analysis Update

Whitney R. Armstrong The SANE Collaboration

Temple University

January 14, 2012

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 1 / 36

1 Introduction

2 SANEMeasurement and Motivating PhysicsOperator Product ExpansionExisting Data

3 BETA AnalysisOverview of Detectors

BigcalGas CerenkovLucite HodoscopeForward Tracker

Polarized TargetBackground

4 AsymmetriesExtracting Spin Structure FunctionsPreliminary Results

5 Conclusion and Future Work

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 2 / 36

Outline1 Introduction2 SANE

Measurement and Motivating PhysicsOperator Product ExpansionExisting Data

3 BETA AnalysisOverview of Detectors

BigcalGas CerenkovLucite HodoscopeForward Tracker

Polarized TargetBackground

4 AsymmetriesExtracting Spin Structure FunctionsPreliminary Results

5 Conclusion and Future Work

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 3 / 36

SANE

4.7GeV and 5.9GeV beam energiesPolarized Ammonia TargetBig Electron Telescope Array

BETA is a unique detector

Large solid angle 200mSrOpen configurationNo momentum selecting magnet

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 4 / 36

SANE

4.7GeV and 5.9GeV beam energiesPolarized Ammonia TargetBig Electron Telescope Array

BETA is a unique detector

Large solid angle 200mSrOpen configurationNo momentum selecting magnet

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 4 / 36

SANE

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 5 / 36

Physics

1 Measured A‖ and A80

2 Determine A1 and A2

3 Evaluate g1 and g2 as functions of a scaling variable.4 Calculate Moments → dp

2

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 6 / 36

Physics

1 Measured A‖ and A80

2 Determine A1 and A2

3 Evaluate g1 and g2 as functions of a scaling variable.4 Calculate Moments → dp

2

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 6 / 36

Physics

1 Measured A‖ and A80

2 Determine A1 and A2

3 Evaluate g1 and g2 as functions of a scaling variable.

4 Calculate Moments → dp2

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 6 / 36

Physics

1 Measured A‖ and A80

2 Determine A1 and A2

3 Evaluate g1 and g2 as functions of a scaling variable.4 Calculate Moments → dp

2

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 6 / 36

Operator Product Expansion

... the whole point of the operator product expansion is toseparate the parts of Feynman diagrams where every linecarries a large momentum, which in asymptotically freetheories can be calculated using perturbation theory, from thecontribution of the parts of Feynman diagrams through whichsmall momenta flow, which cannot be calculated perturbatively1

1S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol 2, p 288W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 7 / 36

A twist-3 sum rule

Using the Operator Product Expansion for the non-local operatorsshowing up in the S matrix, one can arrive a the infinite set of sumrules below. For n ≥ 3 and n odd, we have∫ 1

0dxxn−1{g1 +

n

n− 1g2} =

12

∑i

δidin−1E

n2,i(Q

2, g) (1)

For n = 3 ∫ 1

0x2{g1 +

32g2}dx =

12d2 (2)

Interpretations of d2

Color Polarizabilities (X.Ji)

Average Color Lorentz force (M.Burkardt)

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 8 / 36

A twist-3 sum rule

Using the Operator Product Expansion for the non-local operatorsshowing up in the S matrix, one can arrive a the infinite set of sumrules below. For n ≥ 3 and n odd, we have∫ 1

0dxxn−1{g1 +

n

n− 1g2} =

12

∑i

δidin−1E

n2,i(Q

2, g) (1)

For n = 3 ∫ 1

0x2{g1 +

32g2}dx =

12d2 (2)

Interpretations of d2

Color Polarizabilities (X.Ji)Average Color Lorentz force (M.Burkardt)

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 8 / 36

Quark-gluon Correlations

M. Burkardt

d2 = 3∫x2g2(x)dx = 1

2MP+2Sx〈P, S | q(0)gG+y(0)γ+q(0) | P, S〉

but with ~v = −cz√2G+y = −Ey +Bx = −( ~E + ~v × ~B)y

d2 ⇒ average color Lorentz force acting on quark moving backwards(since we are in inf. mom. frame) the instant after being struck by thevirtual photon. 〈F y〉 = −2M2d2

PP

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 9 / 36

Quark-gluon Correlations

M. Burkardt

d2 = 3∫x2g2(x)dx = 1

2MP+2Sx〈P, S | q(0)gG+y(0)γ+q(0) | P, S〉

but with ~v = −cz√2G+y = −Ey +Bx = −( ~E + ~v × ~B)y

d2 ⇒ average color Lorentz force acting on quark moving backwards(since we are in inf. mom. frame) the instant after being struck by thevirtual photon. 〈F y〉 = −2M2d2

PP

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 9 / 36

gp1 Data

Figure: World data on gp1(x). The red data points fall within the SANE Q2

range.

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 10 / 36

gp2 Data

Figure: World data on gp2(x). The red data points fall within the SANE Q2

range.

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 11 / 36

d2 =∫ 1

0 x2{2g1 + 3g2}dx

x0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05 2 = 4 GeV2Q p

1SLAC_E143 g

p

1SLAC_E155 g

p

1EMC g

p

1SMC g

p

1HERMES g

p

1CLAS g

p

1RSS g

<6.502 2.50 <Qp

1All g1p data gxg1p BB xg1p DNS2005 xg1p AAC xg1p GS

)2= 4.5 GeV2(x,Qp1

g2x

Figure: The gp1(x) contribution to thedp2 integrand.

x0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

2 = 4 GeV2Qp

2SLAC_E143 g

p

2SLAC_E155 g

p

2SMC g

p

2RSS g

<6.502 2.50 <Qp

2WWAll g2p data g

g2pWW BB

g2pWW DNS2005 g2pWW AAC g2pWW GS

)2= 4.5 GeV2(x,Qp2

g2x

Figure: The gp2(x) contribution to thedp2 integrand.

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 12 / 36

d2 =∫ 1

0 x2{2g1 + 3g2}dx

Figure: dp2(Q2)

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 13 / 36

Outline1 Introduction2 SANE

Measurement and Motivating PhysicsOperator Product ExpansionExisting Data

3 BETA AnalysisOverview of Detectors

BigcalGas CerenkovLucite HodoscopeForward Tracker

Polarized TargetBackground

4 AsymmetriesExtracting Spin Structure FunctionsPreliminary Results

5 Conclusion and Future Work

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 14 / 36

Big Electron Telescope Array

SANE used BETA to detect inclusive electrons with a large acceptanceat angles around 40◦for energies above about 1 GeV.

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 15 / 36

Bigcal

Two Sections

The upper section from YerevanPhysics Institute used during RCSexperiment.

It consists of 4x4x40cm3

lead-glass blocksThey are arranged in a 30x24array

Lower section from IHEP inProtvino, Russia.

It consists of 3.8x3.8x45cm3

lead-glass blocksThey are arranged in 32x32array

1,744 lead glass blocks total.

Figure: Bigcal lead-glass blocks

Bigcal was previously used in theGEp series of experiments

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 16 / 36

SANE Gas Cerenkov

Gas Cerenkov is from Temple University.

Design

Filled with nitrogen gas atatmosphere.Uses 4 spherical and 4 toroidalmirrors to focus light tophotomultiplier tubes.Used 3 inch quartz windowPhotonis PMTs for UVtransparencyMirror blanks were sent toCERN for special coating forhigh reflectivity far into theUV. Figure: Gas Cerenkov on Hall C floor

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 17 / 36

Lucite Hodoscope

Lucite Hodoscope is from North Carolina A&T State University.

Design

28 curved Lucite bars withlight guides mounted to edgescut at 45◦

PMT with light guide mountedat both ends of each bar.

Figure: Lucite Hodoscope in Hall C

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 18 / 36

Forward Tracker

Forward tracker is from Norfolk State University and University ofRegina

Design

3 layers of 3mmx3mm scintillators.1 horizontally segmented layer closestto the target consisting of 72 segments2 vertically segmented layersconsisting of 128 segments eachWLS fibers glued to each bar withfibers connected to Hamamatsu64-Channel PMTs Figure: Forward tracker in

position between Cerenkovsnout and target OVC

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 19 / 36

Polarized Target

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 20 / 36

Polarized Target

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

72100 72200 72300 72400 72500 72600 72700 72800 72900 73000 73100

Abs

olut

e P

olar

izat

ion

Run Number

Preliminary Absolute Target Polarization for All SANE Runs

Positive PolarizationNegative Polarization

Figure: Target polarization during the experiment by James Maxwell

Average polarization was about 70%

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 21 / 36

Pair Symmetric Background

Sources

π0 → γγ∗ → γe+e− (primary source)γ → e+e−

Figure: π0 asymmetry vs run number courtesy of Luwani Ndukum

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 22 / 36

Figure: Starting at the top left plot: φπ0 vs θπ0, ∆ycluster vs ∆xcluster,∆ycluster vs θπ0, jpeakvsipeak, Cherenkov TDC (red showing tdc cut), Numberof Electrons Detected (red = TDC cut, blue = Events with 3 clusters), Eπ0,Mπ0

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 23 / 36

Outline1 Introduction2 SANE

Measurement and Motivating PhysicsOperator Product ExpansionExisting Data

3 BETA AnalysisOverview of Detectors

BigcalGas CerenkovLucite HodoscopeForward Tracker

Polarized TargetBackground

4 AsymmetriesExtracting Spin Structure FunctionsPreliminary Results

5 Conclusion and Future Work

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 24 / 36

Direct access to the polarized structure functions can be obtainedutilizing the following

A‖ = D(A1 − ξA2) (3)

A⊥ = d(A2 − ξA1) (4)

A1 =g1 − (4M2x2/Q2)g2)

F1(5)

A2 =2Mx√Q2

g1 + g2F1

(6)

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 25 / 36

Kinematic Coverage

Plot by James Maxwell

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 26 / 36

Preliminary Results

Preliminary results for Ap1 and Ap

2 courtesy of James Maxwell

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 27 / 36

Outline1 Introduction2 SANE

Measurement and Motivating PhysicsOperator Product ExpansionExisting Data

3 BETA AnalysisOverview of Detectors

BigcalGas CerenkovLucite HodoscopeForward Tracker

Polarized TargetBackground

4 AsymmetriesExtracting Spin Structure FunctionsPreliminary Results

5 Conclusion and Future Work

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 28 / 36

Conclusion and Future Work

Analysis in progress

Dilution factors for BETA from MC.Optimize pair symmetric background cutsUnderstand kinematic cutsRadiative CorrectionsDetermining the systematic errors

More results soon to come...

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 29 / 36

Thank You!

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 30 / 36

Backup Slides

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 31 / 36

Radiative Corrections

Preliminary results for gp1 and gp

2 courtesy of James Maxwell

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 32 / 36

Preliminary Results

Preliminary results for gp1 and gp

2 courtesy of James Maxwell

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 33 / 36

InSANE Event Display

Figure:

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 34 / 36

InSANE

Focus on physics analysisNot a CODA decoderMultiple analysis passesMake full use of ROOT I/OEasier transition MC → DATA

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 35 / 36

Experimental Run

Oct. 28, 2008 - First beam. Commissioning and calibrations.Nov. 3, 2008 - Series of target quenches. Magnet broken.Dec. 18, 2008 - Magnet Quenches. Refrigerator went bad andmagnet is really broken.Jan. 24, 2009 - Magnet is fixed. Many thanks to Bill Vulcan, Jlabstaff, and UVa target group!Jan. 30, 2009 - Start perpendicular 4.7 GeV production.Feb. 9, 2009 - Start perpendicular 5.9 GeV productionFeb. 27, 2009 - Resume perpendicular 4.7 GeV productionMarch 6, 2009 - Start parallel 5.9 GeV productionMarch 12, 2009 - Start parallel 5.9 GeV productionMarch 16, 2009 - Experiment finished

W. Armstrong (Temple) SANE January 14, 2012 36 / 36