spin frustration and mott criticality in triangular-lattice organics under controlled mottness
DESCRIPTION
2013 Hangzhou Workshop on Quantum Matter, April 22, 2013. Spin frustration and Mott criticality in triangular-lattice organics under controlled Mottness. K. Kanoda, Applied Physics, Univ. of Tokyo. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Spin frustration and Mott criticality in triangular-lattice organics
under controlled Mottness
2013 Hangzhou Workshop on Quantum Matter, April 22, 2013
K. Kanoda, Applied Physics, Univ. of Tokyo
1. Ground states: SL vs AFM
2. Weak/strong Mott transitions from SL/AFM
3. Quantum criticality at high temperatures
(4. Doped triangular lattice)
H. Oike, T. Furukawa, Y. Shimizu (Nagoya Univ.), H. Hashiba, Y. Kurosaki, K. Umeda, K. Miyagawa,
S. Yamashita, Y. Nakazawa
M. Maesato, G. Saito (Meijo Univ.)
H. Taniguchi
Univ. of Tokyo
Kyoto Univ.
Osaka Univ.
Saitama Univ.
Outline
Mott physics in 2D organics
N. Mott (1949)
?U/W (Mottness)
Tem
pera
ture
AF/SLSC
Mott insulator Metal
Anderson (1973)
Mott transition
Criticality ?
Charge
Frustration
AF or Spin Liq. ?
SpinSuperconductivity
Pairing origin ?
Charge/Spin
Onnes (1911)
All in one material
-(ET)2X; quasi-triangular lattice systems
ET+0.5
t’
t t
t’
t t
t’
t t
t’
t t
Ab initio Kandpal et al.(2009)Nakamura et al.(2009)
0.687.2Metal (SC)Cu[N(CN)2]Br
0.757.5Mott ins.Cu[N(CN)2]Cl
6.5
6.6
6.8
6.8
8.2
U/t
0.58Metal (SC)I3
0.60Metal (SC)Ag(CN)2 H2O
0.68Metal (SC)Cu(CN)[N(CN)2]
0.84Metal (SC)Cu(NCS)2
1.06Mott ins.Cu2(CN)3
t’/tX-
0.687.2Metal (SC)Cu[N(CN)2]Br
0.757.5Mott ins.Cu[N(CN)2]Cl
6.5
6.6
6.8
6.8
8.2
U/t
0.58Metal (SC)I3
0.60Metal (SC)Ag(CN)2 H2O
0.68Metal (SC)Cu(CN)[N(CN)2]
0.84Metal (SC)Cu(NCS)2
1.06Mott ins.Cu2(CN)3
t’/tGround state
at ambient pressureX-
0.687.2Metal (SC)Cu[N(CN)2]Br
0.757.5Mott ins.Cu[N(CN)2]Cl
6.5
6.6
6.8
6.8
8.2
U/t
0.58Metal (SC)I3
0.60Metal (SC)Ag(CN)2 H2O
0.68Metal (SC)Cu(CN)[N(CN)2]
0.84Metal (SC)Cu(NCS)2
1.06Mott ins.Cu2(CN)3
t’/tX-
0.687.2Metal (SC)Cu[N(CN)2]Br
0.757.5Mott ins.Cu[N(CN)2]Cl
6.5
6.6
6.8
6.8
8.2
U/t
0.58Metal (SC)I3
0.60Metal (SC)Ag(CN)2 H2O
0.68Metal (SC)Cu(CN)[N(CN)2]
0.84Metal (SC)Cu(NCS)2
1.06Mott ins.Cu2(CN)3
t’/tGround state
at ambient pressureX-
0.80
0.44
X-1
Mott phase diagrams of quasi-triangular lattices
QSL FLSC
Critical endpoint
P (MPa)
T(K
)
QSL FLSC
Critical endpoint
P (MPa)
T(K
)
P (MPa)
T (K)
AFI
Critical endpoint
FLSC
P (MPa)
T (K)
AFI
Critical endpoint
FLSC
0.33
>10
1
R/Rc
-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3 t’/t=0.80-1.0
-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl t’/t=0.44-0.75
t’
t t
t’
t t
t’
t t
t’
t t
Similar QC behavior at high T
Dissimilar at low T
frustrated less frustrated
-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3 t’/t ~ 0.80-1.06
AFIAFIAFI
-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl t’/t ~ 0.44-0.75Kagawa et al., Nature 2005 , PRL 2004; PRB 2004,
Kurosaki et a., PRL 2005, Furukawa et al.unpublished
Spin liquid
Separation of charge localization and spin ordering on triangular lattice
Highly correlated particles
Uncorrelated waves
AF insulator Metal/SC
(U/W)Mott
AF insulator Metal/SCSpin liq.
U/W
Frustrated lattice
correlated particle/wave
Thermodynamic anomaly at 6K in -(ET)2Cu2(CN)3
Specific heat S. Yamashita et al., Nature Phys. 4 (2008) 459
Thermal expansion coefficient Manna et al., PRL 104 (2010) 016403
Thermal conductivity M. Yamashita et al., Nature Phys. 5 (2009) 44
NMR Relaxation rate Shimizu et al., PRB 70 (2006) 060510
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Temperature (K)
(a)
13C NMRrelaxation rate
Inhomogeneous relaxation0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Temperature (K)
(a)
13C NMRrelaxation rate
Inhomogeneous relaxation0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Temperature (K)
(a)
13C NMRrelaxation rate
Inhomogeneous relaxation
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
BBBB
BBBBBBBBBBBB
BBBBBBBB
B
BB
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJ
J
J
J
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TEMPERATURE (K)
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
BBBBBBBBBBBB
BBBBBB
BBB
B
B
BB
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
J
J
JJ
11111111111111111111111
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TEMPERATURE (K)
13C NMR under a parallel field
B
-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800SHIFT from TMS (ppm)
20 K
18 K
16 K
14 K
12 K
10 K
8 K
6 K
4 K
2 K
-ET2Cu2(CN)3Magic Angle
a axis
line shift
line width
a decrease in local
line broadeningField-induced spin texture ?
6K
Degenerate spinons (Motrunich, P.A. Lee, Senthil)
Spin liquid in -(ET)2Cu2(CN)3; Gapless or marginally gapped
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
■ 0T
▼ 1T
● 4T
◆ 8T
■ 0T
▼ 1T
● 4T
◆ 8T
CPT
-1 /
mJ
K-2
mol
-1
T2 (K2)
Spin liquid -(E
T) 2Cu 2
(CN) 3
AF insulator -(ET) 2
X, ’-(ET) 2
ICl 2
S. Yamashita et al., , Nature Phys. 4 (2008) 459
Specific heat gapless (= 13-14 mJ/K2mol)
0
50
T2 (K2)
Thermal conductivity gapped; 0.46 K
M. Yamashita et a., Nature Phys. 5 (2009) 44
-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3
= 13-14 mJ/K2mol
Nuclear Shottky
Criticalpoint
Mott Insulator
Metal
Criticalpoint
Mott Insulator
Metal
Kagawa et al., Nature 436 (2005) 534
Conductivity
Strong Mott transition from antiferromagnet
Resistance
-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl
AFIAFIAFI
-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3
Senthil et al., PRB (2008) and pfreprint
Weak Mott transition from spin liquid
Spin liquid
Phase diagram
11K
9K
7K
5K
1~10 h/e2
Resistivityjump
Quantum Mott transition from spin liquid
T P
T-dependence of P-dependence of
~8h/e2
-m=cf(zv/T)
zv =0.68
P(MPa)T(K)
R(ohm)
P(MPa)T(K)
R(ohm)
P
Mott transition seen in spin degrees of freedom
-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl t’/t=0.44-0.75
less frustrated
-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3 t’/t=0.80-1.0
frustrated
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
79.07 79.12 79.17 79.22 79.27 79.32
Frequency [MHz]
5MPa
110MPa
155MPa
175MPa
190MPa
79.279.1 79.3
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
79.07 79.12 79.17 79.22 79.27 79.32
Frequency [MHz]
5MPa
110MPa
155MPa
175MPa
190MPa
79.279.1 79.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200Pressure [MPa]
5K
2K
P
NMR
NMR spectra
NMR spectra
Mott trans
metal
insulator
Mott trans
Holon-doublon pair excitation costs more in AF than in SL
AF
SL
J
U-V(r) +8J
U-V(r) +JExotic charge excitations in spin liquid state fermionic; Ng & P.A. Lee, PRL 99 (2007) 156402. bosonic; Qi & Sachdev: PRB 77 (2008) 165112
Miyagawa et al., PRL89 (2002) 017003
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
1 10 100Temperature (K)
-(ET)2Cu
2(CN)
3 13C NMR
0 kbar (inner)
4.3 kbar (3.5 T)
4.3 kbar (2.0 T)
~T3
TC
Not pseudo-gapped
Not pseudo-gapped nearby spin liq.
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJ
BBB
BBBBBBBB
B
BB
BBBBB
EEEEEEEE
0.005
0.01
0.1
1
1 10 100 1000TEMPERATURE (K)
J
JJJJ
JJJJJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJ
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0 5 10 15 20 25 30TEMPERATURE (K)
13C NMR
TC
H // conducting layer
13C NMR
(a)
(b)Pseudo-gapped
AFIAFIAFI
Pseudo-gapped nearby AFM
13C NMR 1/T1T
Spin liquid
Deuterated -Br
Shimizu et al., PRB 81 (2010) 224508
-Cu2(CN)312K
3-4 K
Pseudo-gap killed by field and pressure
###
##
#####
#
#
#
##
############
####
########
#
JJ J JJJ
J
J JJ J
J JJ J
J J J JJJJ
J
J
J
J J J
II I
I II I
IIII
II
II I I
I
I
I
II
I I
II
I
J
JJ
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
JJ
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J£
£
£
££
£
£ £ ££
£
£
£
£
£
££
£
£
£
£
£
£
J
J
JJJ
J
J
J
J
J
JJ
JJ
J
JJJ
JJJJJ
JJ
JJJJJ
J
JJJJJJ
JJJJJ
J
J
###
###
###
#
#
#
##
##
####################
###
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Temperature (K)
TC
11THH
13C-NMR H // b axis
15.5T
pseudogap
0.9T3.8T
00.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.1
0.11
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65T[K]
1/T1
T[sec
-̂1]
04MPa20MPa50MPa100MPaAmbient(*1)
Tc1/T
1T(1
/sK
)
Pressure
Field dependence Pressure dependence
PG has connection with superconductivity as well as spin fluctuations
Ground states of with half-filling
AF
SL
SC
Metal
t’
t t
t’
t t
t’
t t
t’
t t
Mottness (U/W)
Fru
stra
tion
(t’/
t)
Strong Mott from AFPseudo-gappedHigh Tc
Weak Mott from SLgapless
Not pseudo-gappedlow Tc
e-
e- e-
e-
e-
-
- -
-
e-
e- e-
e-
e-
-
- -
-
e-
e- e-
e-
e-
-
- -
-
e-
e- e-
e-
e-
-
- -
-t’/t =1
t’/t <1
gapless-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3
-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl
tow
ard
squa
re la
ttic
e
triangle
(U/W)critical
PG
DMFT of Hubbard model at high temperatures
Quantum Critical Transport Near the Mott Transition H. Terletska et al., PRL 107 (2011)
Resistivities (T,δ) are scaled with the one parameter, T/T0
Characteristic energy, T0∝δzv
quantum criticality
T
δ=(t/U)-(t/U)c
T - t/U phase diagram
t/U
T
vs T calc.
vs T/T0 calc.
Mott Ins. Fermi Iiq.
Zv=0.57
T0∝ δ zv
High-T scaling of resistivity for -(ET)2Cu2(CN)3
cf. zv =0.57 (DMFT)
T/T0
(T, )=c(T)f(T/T0)
f(T/T0)= exp[(T/T0)1/zv]
-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3
QSL FLSC
Critical endpoint
P (MPa)
T(K
)
QSL FLSC
Critical endpoint
P (MPa)
T(K
)
Zv=0.60±0.05T0=c zv
35K, 40K, 45K, 50K, 55K, 60K, 65K, 70K, 75K, 80K, 90K, 100K, 110K
P<Pc
Nearly perfect !
0.33
>10
1
R/Rc
0.33
>10
1
R/Rc
P>Pc
P>Pc
T/T0
~T 2
35K, 40K, 45K, 50K, 55K, 60K, 65K, 70K, 75K, 80K, 90K, 100K, 110K
T0 ∝ δ zv
High-T scaling of resistivity for -(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl
cf. zv =0.57 (DMFT)
T/T0
(T, )=c(T)f(T/T0)
f(T/T0)= exp[(T/T0)1/zv]
-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3
Zv=0.50±0.05T0=c zv
P<Pc
P (MPa)T (K
)
AFI
Critical endpoint
FLSC
P (MPa)T (K
)
AFI
Critical endpoint
FLSC
P<Pc
P>Pc
0.33
>10
1
R/Rc
0.33
>10
1
R/Rc
Quantum phase transitionT
(K
)
DoniachQ
CP
AF Fermi Liq.
Heavy electrons
RKKY vs Kondo
Mott
Kinetic energ vs Coulomb
T (
K) U
W
Mott transition
~5000 K
20 Kt
Fermi liq.Mott ins.
Doped triangular lattice
U/t t’/t
1/2-filled systems>-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3 8.20 1.06-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl 7.58 0.74-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br 7.20 0.68-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2 6.98 0.86-(ET)2I3 6.48 0.58
(U/t)critical
Metal/SC
Mott insulator
Mot
t in
sula
tor
-(ET)4Hg2.89Br8 ---11% hole doped/ET2
Hg3-X8 (X=Br, Cl)
(ET)2+1+ Hole dopingET layer
X layer
-(ET)4Hg2.89Br8 10.01 1.02 Metal/SC
0
0.0001
0.0002
0.0003
0.0004
0.0005
0.0006
0.0007
0.0008
0.0009
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
⊥
∥
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ
ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
0
0.0001
0.0002
0.0003
0.0004
0.0005
0.0006
0.0007
0.0008
0.0009
0.001
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Temperature (K)
E a�C pade[6,6]J=150K
Ñ pade[6,6]J=160K
D pade[7,7]J=150K
A pade[7,7]J=160K
Triangular LatticeHeisenberg model
J =160 K
J =150 K
Spi
n(e
mu/
mol
e of
ET
dim
er)
Taniguchi et al.
Spin susceptibility
Well fitted to triangular-lattice HeisenbergJ=150 K
0
0.0001
0.0002
0.0003
0.0004
0.0005
0.0006
0.0007
0.0008
0.0009
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T(K)
⊥
∥
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ
ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
0
0.0001
0.0002
0.0003
0.0004
0.0005
0.0006
0.0007
0.0008
0.0009
0.001
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Temperature (K)
E a�C pade[6,6]J=150K
Ñ pade[6,6]J=160K
D pade[7,7]J=150K
A pade[7,7]J=160K
Triangular LatticeHeisenberg model
J =160 K
J =150 K
Spi
n(e
mu/
mol
e of
ET
dim
er)
Taniguchi et al.
Spin susceptibility
Well fitted to triangular-lattice HeisenbergJ=150 K
Hall coefficient
Lyubovslaya (1986)
P (GPa)
d(1/
R H)/
dP (C
/cm
3/G
Pa) 10K
Compressibility of 1/RH
Conductivity of -(ET)4Hg2.89Br8 measured by contactless method under pressure
Non-Fermi liq. Fermi liq. by pressure
Non-Fermi liq.
Fermi liq.
//∝T
//∝T 2
Temperature (K)
//
(
m
cm)
sample#3
Tem
pera
ture
(K)
Pressure(GPa)
sample#3
Tem
pera
ture
(K)
Pressure(GPa)
R = r0 + aT
Possible quantum phase transition
U>W U<WDouble occupancy
forbiddenSmall FS ?
(Doped Mott; t-J)
Double occupancy allowed
Large FS ? (Hubbard metal)
-(ET)4Hg2.89Br8
high-Tc cuprate
Conclusion
1) variation at low temperatures (gapless) SL vs AFM weak Mott strong Mott pseudo-gap no pseudo-gap higher Tc lower Tc
2) universality at high temperatures Mott criticality ---- quantum
½-filled systems with variable frustration
Even under doped systemsA QPT or sharp crossover at (U/W)critical