square-wave voltammetry: the most advanced electroanalytical technique
DESCRIPTION
Square-wave voltammetry: the most advanced electroanalytical technique. Valentin Mir č eski Institute of Chemistry Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics “Ss Cyril and Methodius” University, Skopje Republic of Macedonia. Square-Wave Voltammetry: Potential Modulation. Red Ox + e. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
11
Square-wave voltammetry: the most advanced
electroanalytical technique
Valentin MirValentin MirččeskieskiInstitute of Chemistry Institute of Chemistry
Faculty of Natural Sciences and MathematicsFaculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
““Ss Cyril and Methodius” University, SkopjeSs Cyril and Methodius” University, Skopje
Republic of MacedoniaRepublic of Macedonia
2
t / s
E /
V
Esw
E
Square-wave voltammetry (SWV) is a pulsed voltammetric technique. The potential modulation consists of a train of equal potential pulses superimposed on a staircase potential ramp.
t / s
E /
V
Square-Wave Voltammetry: Potential Modulation
Red Ox + e
•
Ox + e Red
•
f = 1/vE f
A single potential cycle consisting of a two equal potential pulses superimposed on a single potential tread in two opposite (anodic and cathodic) directions. The current is measured at the end of each pulse in order to discriminate against the capacitate current and to extract only the faradic response of the electrode reaction. Properties of the potential modulation are: Esw – SW amplitude (pulse height); E –potential step; – duration of a single potential cycle; f - frequency of the pulses.
3
0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.150.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
net p
f p
bp
Ep
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 16004
3
2
1
0
1
2
3
4
54.31
3.725
j
1.5 103
1 j
Variation of the current with the time in the course of the experiment
4
t0
I
If / Ic >> 1(sampling point)
Faradaic current I f
(due to electrode reaction)
Capacitive current, Ic (due to charging - formation of the double layer)
Faradaic vs. capacitive current in the course of a single potential pulse
5
SW voltammogram
0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.20.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.723
0.212
net p
f p
bp
0.190.19 Ep
net
f
b
net = f - b
Net component, calculated (not measured!) as a difference between the forward and backward components
Forward component measured at the end of each pulse with odd serial number (i.e., 1st, 3rd, etc.;
Backward component measured at the end of each pulse with even serial number (i.e., 1st, 3rd, etc.;
6
Time window of the voltammetric experiment
SWV
Scan rate: v = f E
Example: E = 0.1 mV, f = 200 Hz
v = 0.020 V/s
= 1/f = 5 msExample:
E = 0.1 mV, f = 500 Hz
v = 0.050 V/s
t = 2 ms
CV
For 300 mV potential pathFor 300 mV potential path
vv = 60 V/s = 60 V/s
vv = 150 V/s = 150 V/s
7
A technique for mechanistic, kinetic and analytical application
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4
-0.6
-0.3
0
0.3
0.6
0.9
-0.35 0.15
-0.6
-0.3
0
0.3
0.6
0.9
-0.35 0.15
-0.6
-0.3
0
0.3
0.6
0.9
-0.35 0.15
An electrode reaction of a dissolved redox couple
Surface confined electrode reaction
irrevrersible
irrevrersible
quasirev. reversible
quasirev. reversible
8
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.5 0 0.5
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.5 0 0.5
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.5 0 0.5
EC mechanism
ECE mechanism
9
Electrode mechanisms
I. Electrode reaction of an immobilized redox coupe (surface electrode reaction);
II. Electrode mechanism involving formation of an insoluble compound with the electrode material;
10
Ox(ads)
Red(ads)
Oxbulk
Redbulk
ne- Diffusion mass transport is neglected
Ox(ads) + ne- Red(ads)
Ele
ctr
od
e
Reaction scheme for the electrode reaction of an immobilized redox coupe (surface confined electrode reaction)
11
Toward electrode kinetic measurements: Modeling and application
Application:
Protein-film voltammetry;
Electrochemicaly active drugs;
Simple adsorbates (many organic compounds);
Azodies; Metal complexes; Organometalic
compounds; Surface modified
electrodes; Voltammetry of solid
micro- particles etc.
][
d
dd
d
0
0,0
Re
Re
Re
Re
dOxs
d
Ox
dOx
dOx
ΓeΓeknFA
InFA
I
t
ΓnFA
I
t
Γ
ΓΓΓt
ΓΓΓt
12
Inet
Net dimensionless SW voltammograms simulated for different reversibility of the electrode reaction
irreversible quasireversible region reversible
= ks / f
increases
Dimensionless current = I/(nFA*f )
13
0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.20.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.50.48
0.221
Icp 1
Iap 1
Inet p 1
0.20.195 Ep
0
0.4
0.8
-2 -1 0 1 2log)
p
Quasireversible maximum and the SW response at the quasireversible maximum
14
Synchronisation of the rate of the redox transformation withthe SW frequency!
The origin of the quasireversible maximum: Chronoamperometry of the surface eelectrode reaction
0 20 40 60 80 1000
100
200
300
400
500
If j 1
If j 10
If j 15
If j 20
j
ks = f
f = 250 Hz, = 0.5ks = 500 s-1
ks = 375 s-1
ks = 25 s-1
dim
ensi
onle
ss c
urr
ent
t
15
Simple methodology for using the quasireversible maximum for redox kinetic measurements
max = ks / fmax
max calculated by the
model fmax measured in the
experiment
ks = max fmax
16
0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.20
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.80.769
8.176 109
Inet p 1
Inet p 2
Inet p 3
Inet p 4
Inet p 5
Inet p 6
Inet p 7
Inet p 8
0.20.195 Ep
Splitting of the net SW response for fast and reversible surface electrode reaction
increases
17
0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.21
0.5
0
0.5
10.769
0.591
Inet p 1
Icp 1
Iap 1
0.20.195 Ep
0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.20.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.60.576
0.54
Inet p 2
Icp 2
Iap 2
0.20.195 Ep
log() = 0
0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.20.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.30.283
0.282
Inet p 5
Icp 5
Iap 5
0.20.195 Ep
log() = 0.1 log() = 0.4
The Origin of the Splitting
18
40
80
120
160
200
240
35 55 75 95 115
Experimental systems that have been analyzed on the base of quasireversible maximum and the splitting:
Cytochrome C; Alyzarine red-S;Probucole;2-propylthiouracil;Fluorouracil;Molybdenum(VI)-phenantroline-fulvic acid;Azobenzene;Methilene blue,….;
The The dependence of the splitting on the SW amplitudedependence of the splitting on the SW amplitude
Esw / mV
Ep /
mV
19
alizarin
vitamin K2
vitamin B12
Examples of surface confined electrode reactions Examples of surface confined electrode reactions
20
Comparison of theoretical (□) and experimental (○) net peak currents for alizarin as a function of pH.
21
-1.5 10-7
-1 10-7
-5 10-8
0
5 10-8
-0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2
I / A
E / V
ib
if
-3.5 10-7
-2.5 10-7
-1.5 10-7
-5 10-8
-0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2
I / A
E / V
Mo(VI)-phenantroline-fulvic acid systemMo(VI)-phenantroline-fulvic acid system
ks = 8 2 s-1; = 0.41 0.05 n = 2
22
Splitting of the net SW response of methylene blue under the Splitting of the net SW response of methylene blue under the influence of the SW amplitudeinfluence of the SW amplitude
amplitude increasesmethylene bluemethylene blue
3,7-bis(Dimethylamino)-phenothiazin-5-ium chloride
23
Square wave voltammetry of azurin immobilized on 1-decanethiol-modified gold
Azurin – a blue copper protein
24
Square wave voltammetry of famotidin: catalytic hydrogen evolution reaction from adsorbed state
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3
E vs E0' / V
Electrode mechanism
Fam(ads) FamH+(ads)
FamH+(ads) + e- Fam(ads) + H(aq)
famotidine
25
Square wave voltammetry of 2-guanidinobenzimidazole : another example for the catalytic hydrogen evolution reaction
from adsorbed state
SWV DPV LSV
LOD [mol L-1] 0.035 0.14 0.2
LOQ [mol L-1] 0.1 0.4 0.6
26
Ele
ctro
de
S
Reaction scheme of an electrode reaction involving formation of Reaction scheme of an electrode reaction involving formation of chemical bonds with the electrodechemical bonds with the electrode
ne- Application: Sulfur containing amino
acids; Glutathione and other
cysteine containing peptides and proteins;
Mercaptans; Thyroxin; Thiourea; Thioethers; Phorphyrins; Flavins; Sulphide; Iodide etc.
S
S
S
SSS
S
S
27
Modeling
0s
s
0
2
2
(L)e(HgL)
e2
2d
)(d
2
)(:0,0
0)(),()(:0,0
(L)(L)
x
x
cr
Γk
FA
I
FA
I
t
HgLΓ
FA
I
x
LcDxt
HgLΓLcLcxt
x
cD
t
c
HgL (s) + 2e- Hg(l) + L2-(aq)
HgL2(s) + 2e- Hg(l) + 2L-(aq)
HgL (s) + 2e- L2-(ads) + Hg(l)
L2-
(aq)
HgL2(s) + 2e- 2L-(ads) + Hg(l)
2L-
(aq)
28
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
-2 -1 0 1 2 3
log( )
p
precision ± 10 %
Qvazireversible maximum of the cathodic stripping reaction
ks = kmaxD1/4 fmax
3/4 rs-1/2 rs
= 1 cm
Dimensionless current = I / (nFAc*(Df )1/2 )
29
Cathodic stripping voltammetry of glutathione
-0.700-0.600-0.500-0.400-0.300-0.200
-0.35
-0.25
-0.05
0.05
E / V
I /m
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 500 1000 1500 2000
pH = 5.6
pH = 7.0
pH = 8.5
f / Hz
I p f
-1 /
mA
s
ks = 5 0.2 cm s-1
30
-0.700-0.500-0.300
-0.20
-0.10
-0.05
0
0.10
E / V
I /
mA
-0.700-0.500-0.300
-0.23
-0.13
-0.03
0.07
E / V
I /
mA
Cathodic stripping voltammetry of glutathione in the presence of copper
Without Cu2+ With Cu2+
ks = 5.22 cm s-1 ks < 0.11 cm s-1
31
-28
-23
-18
-13
-8
-3
-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
log(c (M2+) / M)
I p
10
8 / A
Zn
Ca
Ba
Mg
Cu
Influence of different cations on the SW net peak currents of glutathione
32
Ele
ctr
od
e
S
S
S
S
S
S
The influence of the metal ions on the morphology of the film deposited on the electrode
ne-
Mx+
Mx+
Mx+
Additional Interactions:
attractionrepulsioncomplexation
33
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20E vs Ag/AgCl / V
I /μ
A
(1)
(2)
(3)
A(aq) = L(aq) L(aq) + Hg(l) = HgL (s) + 2e-
Cathodic stripping mechanism coupled with a chemical reaction
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.100.1
experimental theoretical
6-mercaptopurine-9-D-riboside in the presence of nickel(II) ions
34
Cyclic Square-Wave Voltammetry: a technique of the future
0 1 103 2 10
3 3 103
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.20.19
0.2
k
3 1031 k
0.2 0 0.21
0.5
0
0.5
10.637
0.636
net p 1
0.290.3 Ep
35
36