SR 30 Corridor Study UDor project number is S-R199(185)

Comment Form 2 Study Recommendations

Date ________________

NameJOrganization_______________________________________________________

Address _____________________________________________________________

Email ________________________________ ___ Phone ______________________

After reviewing the SR 30 Corridor Study Recommendations from the handout or presentation please provide comments below and return the completed form to the

email address listed at the bottom of the form

1 1-15 to SR 23 Please provide comments on the SR 30 Corridor Study recommendations for the area between 1-15 and SR 23 Please be as specific as possible noting the specific location for your comment such as the intersection or corridor area

2 SB 23 to 1000 West Please provide comments on the SR 30 Corridor Study recommendations for the area between SR 23 and 1000 West Please be as specific as possible noting the specific location for your comment such as the intersection or corridor area

3 Other Issues and Comments

PHONE (435) 554-1136 EMAIL SR30studyutah gov WEB udotutahgovSR30study

State Route 30Identifying Improvements on State Route 30 bull CORRIDOR STUDY 1-15 to 1000 West

WHAT IS THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY erYllionmentai concerns from those improvements WHAT IS THE CORRIDOR STUDY SCHEDULE AND NEXT STEPS The study also included analysis of safety data and The Utah Department of Transportation conducted current and projected future traffic volumes This a corridor study on 1754 m~es of Slate Route 30 fact sheet documents the results of the study and(SR 30) from Interstate 15 (1-15) to Logan 1000 preliminary draft recommendations to improve the West (10th West or SR 252) UDOT recognizes the Develop a Plan DetermineSR 30 Corridor Local Identify Short Corridor Studyimportance of the SR 30 Corridor to the comlTllJl1ities EnvirorvnentalStakeholder to Implement

Govemment Input and Long-term Resultswithin Box Elder and Cache counties and is Identified Study Lim~sEngagementHOW TO PROVIDE INPUT INTO THE and Coordination Needs Presentations

committed to meeting the short and long-term needs Priority Projects and Scope STUDY PROCESS of the traveling public while ensuring the continued

efficiency of this important route A targeted public Inpul from stakeholders that use the conidor for

engagement program was conducted as part of the personal travel and those that rely on the roule fashy ~~ ~~~~)SR 30 Corridor Study The purpose of the outreach business activities and economic development is crilicai

effort was to seek input from key stakeholders to the corridor study If you have specific concerns

local governments state and federal agencies with or would like to provide comments to these draft I I I Iassociated opportunities for input from the general recommendations please send them to SR3Ostudy

pubhc SpecifIC input was invited on the locations utahgovor use the attached map and provide the Public and Stakeholder Engagement Ned Steps that need improvement along the corridor and completed form to the project team

ARE THE aR so CORRIDOR STUDY POIENITAL RECOliMENDAnON FIIOM 1-15 TO loR 23 Highway Inlersecdon

fj) SR-I1sA30__ O DomRodISA30 ~ LOSABorC bull ) AjdillerS8Clicll~ ction r4o _H_ _ -- bull-~----- LOS D Idd seetoo Iigtang and warnno

e SA R 1- ~ ldd~igJq~vc

glaquolfII8trf and IongtIw1 len ILm WI8

State Route 30Identifying Improvements on State Route 30 bull CORRIDOR STUDY 1-15 to 1000 West

WHAT IS THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY erYllionmentai concerns from those improvements WHAT IS THE CORRIDOR STUDY SCHEDULE AND NEXT STEPS The study also included analysis of safety data and The Utah Department of Transportation conducted current and projected future traffic volumes This a corridor study on 1754 m~es of Slate Route 30 fact sheet documents the results of the study and(SR 30) from Interstate 15 (1-15) to Logan 1000 preliminary draft recommendations to improve the West (10th West or SR 252) UDOT recognizes the Develop a Plan DetermineSR 30 Corridor Local Identify Short Corridor Studyimportance of the SR 30 Corridor to the comlTllJl1ities EnvirorvnentalStakeholder to Implement

Govemment Input and Long-term Resultswithin Box Elder and Cache counties and is Identified Study Lim~sEngagementHOW TO PROVIDE INPUT INTO THE and Coordination Needs Presentations

committed to meeting the short and long-term needs Priority Projects and Scope STUDY PROCESS of the traveling public while ensuring the continued

efficiency of this important route A targeted public Inpul from stakeholders that use the conidor for

engagement program was conducted as part of the personal travel and those that rely on the roule fashy ~~ ~~~~)SR 30 Corridor Study The purpose of the outreach business activities and economic development is crilicai

effort was to seek input from key stakeholders to the corridor study If you have specific concerns

local governments state and federal agencies with or would like to provide comments to these draft I I I Iassociated opportunities for input from the general recommendations please send them to SR3Ostudy

pubhc SpecifIC input was invited on the locations utahgovor use the attached map and provide the Public and Stakeholder Engagement Ned Steps that need improvement along the corridor and completed form to the project team

ARE THE aR so CORRIDOR STUDY POIENITAL RECOliMENDAnON FIIOM 1-15 TO loR 23 Highway Inlersecdon

fj) SR-I1sA30__ O DomRodISA30 ~ LOSABorC bull ) AjdillerS8Clicll~ ction r4o _H_ _ -- bull-~----- LOS D Idd seetoo Iigtang and warnno

e SA R 1- ~ ldd~igJq~vc

glaquolfII8trf and IongtIw1 len ILm WI8

IeftI of Floor Senice CoIIdiIiau ~

shyFlrlllic wi rosIridiongt _ lIIityor ~

SIIIbillie Spood~sllhtly_middotL _ _lllity

5IJWt trollie l1000II1II amp IrMdoon 10 uIocI IjIOOIIltu poss

TrtlirIIow __ s-Ujed to IOddrrn lttp PasIrII is dillbrl

qoidIp ___ is low~ InIIilt 1IowdIIIrce

~ cqesIeIlnilic0-1_-_ poIly

WHAT SEGMENTS OF SR 30 NEED TO HAVE ADDrTlONAL HIGHWAY LANES

To determine where highways need additional lanes UDOT uses a

guideline called level of service (LOS) Level of service is graded on

a letter scale from A to F with A being the best level of serWe and

F being the worst (see graphic to the left) UOOT has set a goal of

maintaining two-lane highways in rural parts of the state (like S A

30) at LOS C or better Therefore LOS A through C are acceptable

operatflg conditions for rLXaI highways and LOS D through F are unacceptable II a rural highway operates at LOS D through F UOOT

considers adding additional travel lanes to improve traffic operations

The orange (LOS D) and red (LOS E and F) segments of SR

30 on the map show where UOOT needs to consider highway

capacity improvements to S R 30 such as adding passing lanes or

widening the highway from two to four lanes The type of capacity

inlJrovement will be evaluated in future studies

Based on projected 2040 traffic volumes and in orcer to achieve

the desired LOS (as shown on the map) the following segments of

SA 30 need highway capacity improvements

bull 1-15 toSA 38

bull SA 23 to 10th West

WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS FOR THE SR 30 CORRIDOR

Based on the type of safety and hghway capacity improvements

identified in the corridor study UOOT has determined that SA 30

can be evaluated in segments

1-15 to SR 23_ UOOT willock at making spot improvements in this

segment of SR 30 to address identified safety and capacity needs

Improvements in this segment can be evaluated independently which

will allow individual projects to move forward more qlickly UDOT will

prioritize projects based on future funoll1g and the identified need

SA 23 to 10th West This segment of SR 30 has numerous

safety issues and the entire segment needs to be evaluated for

additional capacity (adding passing lanes or widening the highway

from two to four lanes) Addressing both safety and capacity will

require reconstructing the highway from SR 23 to 10th West plus

consideration for faciities to safely accommodate bicycles These

types of improvements could affect wetlands and sensitive wildlife

species Therefore starting in summel of 2016 UOOT will begin

an environmental study to evaluate potential alternatives for the

improvements analyze potential environmental impacts and identify

appropriate recommended improvements

State Route 30 W CORRIDOR STUDY

t-15 to 1000 West

GET ON THE MAIUNG LIST

To be added to the study mailing list please provide fCXJf contact information

Name

Emai

Maiing Address

-

Ishyo w o a a

o 0 l c(

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R STU D Y

- If I jllL Wf1

Study Overview

bull Identifies current and future roadway needs

bull Study limits - 1-15 to 10th West Logan (175 miles)

bull Two counties

bull Box Elder

bull Cache

bull 2040 Planning Horizon

bull Not an environmental study (EA or EIS)

bull Does not include alignment changes

2

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

1middot 1 1~ H Ww1

Study Overview

Local Develop a Plan DetermineIdentify Short Corridor Study

Stakeholder Government to Implement Environmental and Long-term Results

Engagement Input and Identified Study Limits Needs Presentations

Coordination Priority Projects and Scope Begins

MarCh-May 2016 May 2016 May 2016 March 2016

~~

Public and Stakeholder Engagement

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

If I() 110

Study Purpose To identify corridor needs

I

bull Design standards

bull Congestion

bull Roadway capacity

Maintenance

bull User considerations

bull Environmental

bull Foggy Weather

Passing Related

+ OverturnRollover

5

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R STU D Y

I 11 IICO WeblCorridor Study Process

Stakeholder Interviews

Government Presentation

Travel

6

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

i l kItllI WI

Level of Flow Service Conditions Descriptions

Highest Quality of serviceo Free traffic flow with few restrictions on maneuverability or speed

Stable traffic flowo Speed becoming slightly restricted low restriction on maneuverability

bull Stable traffic flow but less freedom to select speed change lanes or pass

Traffic flow becoming unstable Speeds subject to sudden change Passing is difficultII

o Unstable traffic flow Speeds change Quickly and maneuverability is low

o Heavily congested traffic Demand exceeds capacity and speeds vary greatly

UDOl s Goal for~

Rural Highways is LOS C or Better

7

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

T 1 ) We

SR 30 2040 Level of Service (LOS)

~ LOSA B orC bull

LOS D

LOS E or F bull

8

II

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I 1 lJ Vifj~1

SR 30 LOS SR 30 SEGMENTS NOT MEETING LOS GOALS IN 2040

11StoSR 23

bull 1-15 to SR 13 Eastbound - LOSD

bull SR 13 to SR 38 Eastbound and Westbound - LOS 0

SR 23 to 10THWest

bull S R 23 to 1900 West westbound - LOS 0

bull 1900 West to 10th West westbound - LOS E and F

bull 10th West to 3200 West eastbound - LOS E and F

INTERSECTION LOS

bull SR 23-LOSF

bull 1400 West - LOS E

bull 10th West - LOS F

9

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

I hI 11 WbfSR 30 Safety Recommendations -15 to SR 23

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 1-15 TO SR 231

~ 1-15toSR38

Potential Highway Safety Mitigation

o MP 913 Railroad crossing ~ Add pullout for school buses

G 6000 WestlSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and turn lanes

e SR 81SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lightingo Bear Hollow DriveSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and warning

signso SR 3Q1SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersectbn lighting improve

geometry and lengthen left turn lane

o Beaver Dam RoadSR 30 Intersection

~ Add intersection lighting and improve intersection gocmetryo SR81 to Beaver Dam Road

~ Reduce wildlife strikes with fencing and wildlife crossing signs

10

-

Ishyo w o a a

o 0 l c(

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R STU D Y

- If I jllL Wf1

Study Overview

bull Identifies current and future roadway needs

bull Study limits - 1-15 to 10th West Logan (175 miles)

bull Two counties

bull Box Elder

bull Cache

bull 2040 Planning Horizon

bull Not an environmental study (EA or EIS)

bull Does not include alignment changes

2

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

1middot 1 1~ H Ww1

Study Overview

Local Develop a Plan DetermineIdentify Short Corridor Study

Stakeholder Government to Implement Environmental and Long-term Results

Engagement Input and Identified Study Limits Needs Presentations

Coordination Priority Projects and Scope Begins

MarCh-May 2016 May 2016 May 2016 March 2016

~~

Public and Stakeholder Engagement

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

If I() 110

Study Purpose To identify corridor needs

I

bull Design standards

bull Congestion

bull Roadway capacity

Maintenance

bull User considerations

bull Environmental

bull Foggy Weather

Passing Related

+ OverturnRollover

5

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R STU D Y

I 11 IICO WeblCorridor Study Process

Stakeholder Interviews

Government Presentation

Travel

6

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

i l kItllI WI

Level of Flow Service Conditions Descriptions

Highest Quality of serviceo Free traffic flow with few restrictions on maneuverability or speed

Stable traffic flowo Speed becoming slightly restricted low restriction on maneuverability

bull Stable traffic flow but less freedom to select speed change lanes or pass

Traffic flow becoming unstable Speeds subject to sudden change Passing is difficultII

o Unstable traffic flow Speeds change Quickly and maneuverability is low

o Heavily congested traffic Demand exceeds capacity and speeds vary greatly

UDOl s Goal for~

Rural Highways is LOS C or Better

7

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

T 1 ) We

SR 30 2040 Level of Service (LOS)

~ LOSA B orC bull

LOS D

LOS E or F bull

8

II

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I 1 lJ Vifj~1

SR 30 LOS SR 30 SEGMENTS NOT MEETING LOS GOALS IN 2040

11StoSR 23

bull 1-15 to SR 13 Eastbound - LOSD

bull SR 13 to SR 38 Eastbound and Westbound - LOS 0

SR 23 to 10THWest

bull S R 23 to 1900 West westbound - LOS 0

bull 1900 West to 10th West westbound - LOS E and F

bull 10th West to 3200 West eastbound - LOS E and F

INTERSECTION LOS

bull SR 23-LOSF

bull 1400 West - LOS E

bull 10th West - LOS F

9

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

I hI 11 WbfSR 30 Safety Recommendations -15 to SR 23

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 1-15 TO SR 231

~ 1-15toSR38

Potential Highway Safety Mitigation

o MP 913 Railroad crossing ~ Add pullout for school buses

G 6000 WestlSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and turn lanes

e SR 81SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lightingo Bear Hollow DriveSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and warning

signso SR 3Q1SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersectbn lighting improve

geometry and lengthen left turn lane

o Beaver Dam RoadSR 30 Intersection

~ Add intersection lighting and improve intersection gocmetryo SR81 to Beaver Dam Road

~ Reduce wildlife strikes with fencing and wildlife crossing signs

10

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R STU D Y

- If I jllL Wf1

Study Overview

bull Identifies current and future roadway needs

bull Study limits - 1-15 to 10th West Logan (175 miles)

bull Two counties

bull Box Elder

bull Cache

bull 2040 Planning Horizon

bull Not an environmental study (EA or EIS)

bull Does not include alignment changes

2

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

1middot 1 1~ H Ww1

Study Overview

Local Develop a Plan DetermineIdentify Short Corridor Study

Stakeholder Government to Implement Environmental and Long-term Results

Engagement Input and Identified Study Limits Needs Presentations

Coordination Priority Projects and Scope Begins

MarCh-May 2016 May 2016 May 2016 March 2016

~~

Public and Stakeholder Engagement

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

If I() 110

Study Purpose To identify corridor needs

I

bull Design standards

bull Congestion

bull Roadway capacity

Maintenance

bull User considerations

bull Environmental

bull Foggy Weather

Passing Related

+ OverturnRollover

5

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R STU D Y

I 11 IICO WeblCorridor Study Process

Stakeholder Interviews

Government Presentation

Travel

6

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

i l kItllI WI

Level of Flow Service Conditions Descriptions

Highest Quality of serviceo Free traffic flow with few restrictions on maneuverability or speed

Stable traffic flowo Speed becoming slightly restricted low restriction on maneuverability

bull Stable traffic flow but less freedom to select speed change lanes or pass

Traffic flow becoming unstable Speeds subject to sudden change Passing is difficultII

o Unstable traffic flow Speeds change Quickly and maneuverability is low

o Heavily congested traffic Demand exceeds capacity and speeds vary greatly

UDOl s Goal for~

Rural Highways is LOS C or Better

7

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

T 1 ) We

SR 30 2040 Level of Service (LOS)

~ LOSA B orC bull

LOS D

LOS E or F bull

8

II

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I 1 lJ Vifj~1

SR 30 LOS SR 30 SEGMENTS NOT MEETING LOS GOALS IN 2040

11StoSR 23

bull 1-15 to SR 13 Eastbound - LOSD

bull SR 13 to SR 38 Eastbound and Westbound - LOS 0

SR 23 to 10THWest

bull S R 23 to 1900 West westbound - LOS 0

bull 1900 West to 10th West westbound - LOS E and F

bull 10th West to 3200 West eastbound - LOS E and F

INTERSECTION LOS

bull SR 23-LOSF

bull 1400 West - LOS E

bull 10th West - LOS F

9

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

I hI 11 WbfSR 30 Safety Recommendations -15 to SR 23

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 1-15 TO SR 231

~ 1-15toSR38

Potential Highway Safety Mitigation

o MP 913 Railroad crossing ~ Add pullout for school buses

G 6000 WestlSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and turn lanes

e SR 81SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lightingo Bear Hollow DriveSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and warning

signso SR 3Q1SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersectbn lighting improve

geometry and lengthen left turn lane

o Beaver Dam RoadSR 30 Intersection

~ Add intersection lighting and improve intersection gocmetryo SR81 to Beaver Dam Road

~ Reduce wildlife strikes with fencing and wildlife crossing signs

10

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

1middot 1 1~ H Ww1

Study Overview

Local Develop a Plan DetermineIdentify Short Corridor Study

Stakeholder Government to Implement Environmental and Long-term Results

Engagement Input and Identified Study Limits Needs Presentations

Coordination Priority Projects and Scope Begins

MarCh-May 2016 May 2016 May 2016 March 2016

~~

Public and Stakeholder Engagement

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

If I() 110

Study Purpose To identify corridor needs

I

bull Design standards

bull Congestion

bull Roadway capacity

Maintenance

bull User considerations

bull Environmental

bull Foggy Weather

Passing Related

+ OverturnRollover

5

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R STU D Y

I 11 IICO WeblCorridor Study Process

Stakeholder Interviews

Government Presentation

Travel

6

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

i l kItllI WI

Level of Flow Service Conditions Descriptions

Highest Quality of serviceo Free traffic flow with few restrictions on maneuverability or speed

Stable traffic flowo Speed becoming slightly restricted low restriction on maneuverability

bull Stable traffic flow but less freedom to select speed change lanes or pass

Traffic flow becoming unstable Speeds subject to sudden change Passing is difficultII

o Unstable traffic flow Speeds change Quickly and maneuverability is low

o Heavily congested traffic Demand exceeds capacity and speeds vary greatly

UDOl s Goal for~

Rural Highways is LOS C or Better

7

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

T 1 ) We

SR 30 2040 Level of Service (LOS)

~ LOSA B orC bull

LOS D

LOS E or F bull

8

II

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I 1 lJ Vifj~1

SR 30 LOS SR 30 SEGMENTS NOT MEETING LOS GOALS IN 2040

11StoSR 23

bull 1-15 to SR 13 Eastbound - LOSD

bull SR 13 to SR 38 Eastbound and Westbound - LOS 0

SR 23 to 10THWest

bull S R 23 to 1900 West westbound - LOS 0

bull 1900 West to 10th West westbound - LOS E and F

bull 10th West to 3200 West eastbound - LOS E and F

INTERSECTION LOS

bull SR 23-LOSF

bull 1400 West - LOS E

bull 10th West - LOS F

9

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

I hI 11 WbfSR 30 Safety Recommendations -15 to SR 23

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 1-15 TO SR 231

~ 1-15toSR38

Potential Highway Safety Mitigation

o MP 913 Railroad crossing ~ Add pullout for school buses

G 6000 WestlSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and turn lanes

e SR 81SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lightingo Bear Hollow DriveSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and warning

signso SR 3Q1SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersectbn lighting improve

geometry and lengthen left turn lane

o Beaver Dam RoadSR 30 Intersection

~ Add intersection lighting and improve intersection gocmetryo SR81 to Beaver Dam Road

~ Reduce wildlife strikes with fencing and wildlife crossing signs

10

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

If I() 110

Study Purpose To identify corridor needs

I

bull Design standards

bull Congestion

bull Roadway capacity

Maintenance

bull User considerations

bull Environmental

bull Foggy Weather

Passing Related

+ OverturnRollover

5

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R STU D Y

I 11 IICO WeblCorridor Study Process

Stakeholder Interviews

Government Presentation

Travel

6

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

i l kItllI WI

Level of Flow Service Conditions Descriptions

Highest Quality of serviceo Free traffic flow with few restrictions on maneuverability or speed

Stable traffic flowo Speed becoming slightly restricted low restriction on maneuverability

bull Stable traffic flow but less freedom to select speed change lanes or pass

Traffic flow becoming unstable Speeds subject to sudden change Passing is difficultII

o Unstable traffic flow Speeds change Quickly and maneuverability is low

o Heavily congested traffic Demand exceeds capacity and speeds vary greatly

UDOl s Goal for~

Rural Highways is LOS C or Better

7

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

T 1 ) We

SR 30 2040 Level of Service (LOS)

~ LOSA B orC bull

LOS D

LOS E or F bull

8

II

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I 1 lJ Vifj~1

SR 30 LOS SR 30 SEGMENTS NOT MEETING LOS GOALS IN 2040

11StoSR 23

bull 1-15 to SR 13 Eastbound - LOSD

bull SR 13 to SR 38 Eastbound and Westbound - LOS 0

SR 23 to 10THWest

bull S R 23 to 1900 West westbound - LOS 0

bull 1900 West to 10th West westbound - LOS E and F

bull 10th West to 3200 West eastbound - LOS E and F

INTERSECTION LOS

bull SR 23-LOSF

bull 1400 West - LOS E

bull 10th West - LOS F

9

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

I hI 11 WbfSR 30 Safety Recommendations -15 to SR 23

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 1-15 TO SR 231

~ 1-15toSR38

Potential Highway Safety Mitigation

o MP 913 Railroad crossing ~ Add pullout for school buses

G 6000 WestlSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and turn lanes

e SR 81SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lightingo Bear Hollow DriveSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and warning

signso SR 3Q1SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersectbn lighting improve

geometry and lengthen left turn lane

o Beaver Dam RoadSR 30 Intersection

~ Add intersection lighting and improve intersection gocmetryo SR81 to Beaver Dam Road

~ Reduce wildlife strikes with fencing and wildlife crossing signs

10

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R STU D Y

I 11 IICO WeblCorridor Study Process

Stakeholder Interviews

Government Presentation

Travel

6

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

i l kItllI WI

Level of Flow Service Conditions Descriptions

Highest Quality of serviceo Free traffic flow with few restrictions on maneuverability or speed

Stable traffic flowo Speed becoming slightly restricted low restriction on maneuverability

bull Stable traffic flow but less freedom to select speed change lanes or pass

Traffic flow becoming unstable Speeds subject to sudden change Passing is difficultII

o Unstable traffic flow Speeds change Quickly and maneuverability is low

o Heavily congested traffic Demand exceeds capacity and speeds vary greatly

UDOl s Goal for~

Rural Highways is LOS C or Better

7

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

T 1 ) We

SR 30 2040 Level of Service (LOS)

~ LOSA B orC bull

LOS D

LOS E or F bull

8

II

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I 1 lJ Vifj~1

SR 30 LOS SR 30 SEGMENTS NOT MEETING LOS GOALS IN 2040

11StoSR 23

bull 1-15 to SR 13 Eastbound - LOSD

bull SR 13 to SR 38 Eastbound and Westbound - LOS 0

SR 23 to 10THWest

bull S R 23 to 1900 West westbound - LOS 0

bull 1900 West to 10th West westbound - LOS E and F

bull 10th West to 3200 West eastbound - LOS E and F

INTERSECTION LOS

bull SR 23-LOSF

bull 1400 West - LOS E

bull 10th West - LOS F

9

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

I hI 11 WbfSR 30 Safety Recommendations -15 to SR 23

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 1-15 TO SR 231

~ 1-15toSR38

Potential Highway Safety Mitigation

o MP 913 Railroad crossing ~ Add pullout for school buses

G 6000 WestlSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and turn lanes

e SR 81SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lightingo Bear Hollow DriveSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and warning

signso SR 3Q1SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersectbn lighting improve

geometry and lengthen left turn lane

o Beaver Dam RoadSR 30 Intersection

~ Add intersection lighting and improve intersection gocmetryo SR81 to Beaver Dam Road

~ Reduce wildlife strikes with fencing and wildlife crossing signs

10

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

i l kItllI WI

Level of Flow Service Conditions Descriptions

Highest Quality of serviceo Free traffic flow with few restrictions on maneuverability or speed

Stable traffic flowo Speed becoming slightly restricted low restriction on maneuverability

bull Stable traffic flow but less freedom to select speed change lanes or pass

Traffic flow becoming unstable Speeds subject to sudden change Passing is difficultII

o Unstable traffic flow Speeds change Quickly and maneuverability is low

o Heavily congested traffic Demand exceeds capacity and speeds vary greatly

UDOl s Goal for~

Rural Highways is LOS C or Better

7

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

T 1 ) We

SR 30 2040 Level of Service (LOS)

~ LOSA B orC bull

LOS D

LOS E or F bull

8

II

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I 1 lJ Vifj~1

SR 30 LOS SR 30 SEGMENTS NOT MEETING LOS GOALS IN 2040

11StoSR 23

bull 1-15 to SR 13 Eastbound - LOSD

bull SR 13 to SR 38 Eastbound and Westbound - LOS 0

SR 23 to 10THWest

bull S R 23 to 1900 West westbound - LOS 0

bull 1900 West to 10th West westbound - LOS E and F

bull 10th West to 3200 West eastbound - LOS E and F

INTERSECTION LOS

bull SR 23-LOSF

bull 1400 West - LOS E

bull 10th West - LOS F

9

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

I hI 11 WbfSR 30 Safety Recommendations -15 to SR 23

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 1-15 TO SR 231

~ 1-15toSR38

Potential Highway Safety Mitigation

o MP 913 Railroad crossing ~ Add pullout for school buses

G 6000 WestlSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and turn lanes

e SR 81SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lightingo Bear Hollow DriveSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and warning

signso SR 3Q1SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersectbn lighting improve

geometry and lengthen left turn lane

o Beaver Dam RoadSR 30 Intersection

~ Add intersection lighting and improve intersection gocmetryo SR81 to Beaver Dam Road

~ Reduce wildlife strikes with fencing and wildlife crossing signs

10

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

T 1 ) We

SR 30 2040 Level of Service (LOS)

~ LOSA B orC bull

LOS D

LOS E or F bull

8

II

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I 1 lJ Vifj~1

SR 30 LOS SR 30 SEGMENTS NOT MEETING LOS GOALS IN 2040

11StoSR 23

bull 1-15 to SR 13 Eastbound - LOSD

bull SR 13 to SR 38 Eastbound and Westbound - LOS 0

SR 23 to 10THWest

bull S R 23 to 1900 West westbound - LOS 0

bull 1900 West to 10th West westbound - LOS E and F

bull 10th West to 3200 West eastbound - LOS E and F

INTERSECTION LOS

bull SR 23-LOSF

bull 1400 West - LOS E

bull 10th West - LOS F

9

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

I hI 11 WbfSR 30 Safety Recommendations -15 to SR 23

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 1-15 TO SR 231

~ 1-15toSR38

Potential Highway Safety Mitigation

o MP 913 Railroad crossing ~ Add pullout for school buses

G 6000 WestlSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and turn lanes

e SR 81SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lightingo Bear Hollow DriveSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and warning

signso SR 3Q1SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersectbn lighting improve

geometry and lengthen left turn lane

o Beaver Dam RoadSR 30 Intersection

~ Add intersection lighting and improve intersection gocmetryo SR81 to Beaver Dam Road

~ Reduce wildlife strikes with fencing and wildlife crossing signs

10

II

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I 1 lJ Vifj~1

SR 30 LOS SR 30 SEGMENTS NOT MEETING LOS GOALS IN 2040

11StoSR 23

bull 1-15 to SR 13 Eastbound - LOSD

bull SR 13 to SR 38 Eastbound and Westbound - LOS 0

SR 23 to 10THWest

bull S R 23 to 1900 West westbound - LOS 0

bull 1900 West to 10th West westbound - LOS E and F

bull 10th West to 3200 West eastbound - LOS E and F

INTERSECTION LOS

bull SR 23-LOSF

bull 1400 West - LOS E

bull 10th West - LOS F

9

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

I hI 11 WbfSR 30 Safety Recommendations -15 to SR 23

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 1-15 TO SR 231

~ 1-15toSR38

Potential Highway Safety Mitigation

o MP 913 Railroad crossing ~ Add pullout for school buses

G 6000 WestlSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and turn lanes

e SR 81SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lightingo Bear Hollow DriveSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and warning

signso SR 3Q1SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersectbn lighting improve

geometry and lengthen left turn lane

o Beaver Dam RoadSR 30 Intersection

~ Add intersection lighting and improve intersection gocmetryo SR81 to Beaver Dam Road

~ Reduce wildlife strikes with fencing and wildlife crossing signs

10

State Route 30 I I CORRIDOR STUDY

I hI 11 WbfSR 30 Safety Recommendations -15 to SR 23

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM 1-15 TO SR 231

~ 1-15toSR38

Potential Highway Safety Mitigation

o MP 913 Railroad crossing ~ Add pullout for school buses

G 6000 WestlSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and turn lanes

e SR 81SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lightingo Bear Hollow DriveSR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersection lighting and warning

signso SR 3Q1SR 30 Intersection ~ Add intersectbn lighting improve

geometry and lengthen left turn lane

o Beaver Dam RoadSR 30 Intersection

~ Add intersection lighting and improve intersection gocmetryo SR81 to Beaver Dam Road

~ Reduce wildlife strikes with fencing and wildlife crossing signs

10

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I lJO llJJI Wb~1SR 30 Recommendations SR 23 to 10th West

WHAT ARE THE SR 30 CORRIDOR STUDY POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM SR 23 TO 10TH WEST

Potential Highway Capacity Potential Highway Safety Mitigation a Lower Logan River Access CD SR 23 to 1900 West Improvements e SR 23SR 30 Intersection ~ Adl left and right turn and ~ WidBn shoulders add weather alert

~ SR 23 to 10th West acceleration lanas system for fog add turn lanes to ~ Improve intersoction geometry access points and consider bike safety

~ Add pull out for sd10d buses ~ Add intersection lighting Cl) 1900 West to 10th West and right turn lane ~ Add contfnUOUS left turn lane improve

o MP 1026 Railroad Crossing G 3200 Westl8R 30 Intersection

Ggt Cutler Marsh MarinaSR 30 CD MP 1072 Curve right turn lane access to businessesIntersection

~ Widen shoulders add shoulders and consider bike ~ Add left turn and accelGration

safetylaoos

11

State Route 30 rI CORRIDOR STUDY

I I) I )ll WUSI

I mplementation Plan

Spot Improvement Locations

bull Capacity Improvements 1-15 to SR 38

bull MP 913 Rail crossing

bull 6000 West Intersection

bull Bear Hollow Drive

bull SR 81 Intersection

bull S R 38 Intersection

bull Beaver Dam Road Intersection

bull SR 81 to Beaver Dam Road - Wildlife Warning Signs

State Route 30 W CORRIDOR STUDY

I I ~ Jf) W(l

Implementation Plan

Environmental Document

bull SR 23 to 10th West

bull Evaluate alternatives and develop recommendations to address the numerous safety and access deficiencies

bull Evaluate alternatives and develop recommendations to address capacity needs and LOS goals

bull Start process in summer 2016

13

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I ( ll U WasQuestion ampAnswer

bull What are your comments on the SR 30 Corridor Study recommendations

bull Additional input

bull Phone (435) 554-1136

bull Email SR30studyutahgov

14

State Route 30 rI CORRIDOR STUDY

I I) I )ll WUSI

I mplementation Plan

Spot Improvement Locations

bull Capacity Improvements 1-15 to SR 38

bull MP 913 Rail crossing

bull 6000 West Intersection

bull Bear Hollow Drive

bull SR 81 Intersection

bull S R 38 Intersection

bull Beaver Dam Road Intersection

bull SR 81 to Beaver Dam Road - Wildlife Warning Signs

State Route 30 W CORRIDOR STUDY

I I ~ Jf) W(l

Implementation Plan

Environmental Document

bull SR 23 to 10th West

bull Evaluate alternatives and develop recommendations to address the numerous safety and access deficiencies

bull Evaluate alternatives and develop recommendations to address capacity needs and LOS goals

bull Start process in summer 2016

13

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I ( ll U WasQuestion ampAnswer

bull What are your comments on the SR 30 Corridor Study recommendations

bull Additional input

bull Phone (435) 554-1136

bull Email SR30studyutahgov

14

State Route 30 W CORRIDOR STUDY

I I ~ Jf) W(l

Implementation Plan

Environmental Document

bull SR 23 to 10th West

bull Evaluate alternatives and develop recommendations to address the numerous safety and access deficiencies

bull Evaluate alternatives and develop recommendations to address capacity needs and LOS goals

bull Start process in summer 2016

13

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I ( ll U WasQuestion ampAnswer

bull What are your comments on the SR 30 Corridor Study recommendations

bull Additional input

bull Phone (435) 554-1136

bull Email SR30studyutahgov

14

State Route 30 I I COR RID 0 R 5 T U D Y

I I ( ll U WasQuestion ampAnswer

bull What are your comments on the SR 30 Corridor Study recommendations

bull Additional input

bull Phone (435) 554-1136

bull Email SR30studyutahgov

14